Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 2: Amount in Controversy Requirement)

[@tazlinarhetoric4543]

I just wanted to thank you for making these videos. I'm studying for the bar exam now, and I had been relying exclusively on Barbri, which for some reason was just not clicking with me. On a whim, I decided to see if KZbin could recommend any review videos, and I've been taking notes on your Civil Procedure videos ever since. I plan on still watching the Barbri reviews (because I paid good money for them), but I'm learning the most from you (and all those helpful graphics you include). Thank you.

[@JDsimplified]

Always great explanations. You trim the excess material without leaving out anything important.

[@theodorevegh6030]

I love your videos. They help me understand the subjects you cover.

[@mudpie6927]

So 75 and one cent

[@Mogan.oganesyan]

Thank you

[@henlohenlo689]

what about if defendant is 2 parties joinder. but it is many indictments many laws broken on various employment law business law contract law fraud law etc etc. some of the indictments apply to 1 of the 2 companies and other indictments to both. it also involves class action but also direct type of claims. would this all be able to be within 1 lawsuit?

[@stellarscrubj]

You got the plaintiff's name wrong in practice question 1.0. It's Karen, not Pam.

[@SpenderDebby-x6n]

Lee Matthew Hernandez Carol Clark Jeffrey