Please, like, share, and comment to help promote this video! If you would like to support the channel, you can do so by either donating or becoming a member: Donate: www.organicchemistrytutor.com/donate/ Membership www.organicchemistrytutor.com/membership/
@williammiketon54137 ай бұрын
please, I need more of these, this was soooooo helpful
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor7 ай бұрын
I’ve got a part 2 to this video 😉
@jeffybrailin53772 жыл бұрын
Finally completed this playlist 😊✌️
@ramashakaroun28632 жыл бұрын
Very good Job and great examples. Thank you :D
@triple_gem_shining18 күн бұрын
Feels good to get most of these correct after thinking deeply on it. I love these types of puzzles.
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor17 күн бұрын
This is a tricky topic. I’m glad you’re getting a lot of these questions correctly!
@milliesmith87832 ай бұрын
Thank you! This was so helpful :)
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor2 ай бұрын
I’m glad you found it helpful 👍
@rezalatifi1905Ай бұрын
Excellent job! Which software do you use for writing?
@mwangalamusialelaamwalana36896 ай бұрын
Hello Victor! Hope you are well.. kindly help me with this question outline a synthetic scheme showing how you can efficiently synthesize busulfan from 1,4-dibromobutane. show all the steps clearly and assume you have all the needed reagents.
@kavinduharshana7406 ай бұрын
awesome explanations 😍
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor5 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it
@himabindu5928 Жыл бұрын
Good video sir question no 2 what is the stereochemistry of the product
@joshuamitchell55302 жыл бұрын
Question 5, why wouldn’t you lose Br- for an SN1 mechanism? The cation is benzylic, and the resulting cation could also rearrange to the tertiary cation? I guess because you have a strong base E2 is just faster?
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor2 жыл бұрын
For the carbocation formation, we need to have protic conditions which would help stabilize the leaving group upon dissociation. Here we have a strongly basic solution, so any protic properties that the ethanol solvent would exhibit are completely “negated” by the base. Thus, the formation of a carbocation is less likely.
@joshuamitchell55302 жыл бұрын
@@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor makes sense. Would SN1 be more likely if we had a more Lewis acidic counter ion though?
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor2 жыл бұрын
If you have a metal which strongly binds/coordinates to your anionic species, the anion is no longer going to be very basic or nucleophlic. Which then brings the question of why bother adding it at all 😉
@joshuamitchell55302 жыл бұрын
@@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor That’s very true, thank you
@SaifaSiddique Жыл бұрын
Very welll explned
@HexaneChemistry7 ай бұрын
Very good
@alexe6242 Жыл бұрын
For question 7 would SN1 proceed as the minor product of the reaction? If so, what would take the place of the leaving group?
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor Жыл бұрын
SN1 and E1 are always in the competition with each other, so yes, you can expect some amount of it depending on how exactly you do the reaction in the lab.
@sportyyy590510 ай бұрын
Question 3: why doesn´t the OCH3 within the molecule react and form a 5 member ring?
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor10 ай бұрын
It's not a particularly good nucleophile, why would it? Besides, hypothetically, even if it did, what would your product be? How would it get rid of the + charge on oxygen?
@carolinelecter96632 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video, thank u, question 2 why there's no E1
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor2 жыл бұрын
SN1 and E1 are always in a competition with each other. So, when you have one, you'll also have the other one. The question is which pathway is going to be major. And in this case, it's the SN1 reaction that will give you the major product, so we're not emphasizing the E1.
@dwirevanityas68348 ай бұрын
why question 7, don't happened rearrangement carbon results like siklo?
@TheThorRs Жыл бұрын
Can someone provide more info as to why question 3 is E2? My thoughts is that ch3o- is a STRONG BASE and it's not bulky, and the substrate gives a secondary. so it can attack the molecule directly which makes me think SN2. MY thoughts as to why it's E2 is because maybe the polar protic solvent is occupying the base and so the base has no choice but to do E2 because of that. thoughts?
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor Жыл бұрын
Not as strong as you make it sound. Also, while secondary allyl halides can do both SN2 and E2 they tend to give an E2 major product when reacting with alkoxides regardless of the size.
@devnarayanmaharshi77311 ай бұрын
same doubt I have because HEAT is not given there, so that reaction must be SN2.
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor10 ай бұрын
@@devnarayanmaharshi773 See my comment above. You might also want to go back to the predictive model and my other videos on the topic. Heat has nothing to do with the outcome of bimolecular reactions.
@michaelowogowog85189 ай бұрын
Why question 3 chose E2 Pathway instead of Sn2
@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor9 ай бұрын
Based on the predictive model (I have a video on that too). 2° leaving group + base/nucleophile as a reagent = E2 major, SN2 minor.