If you want to know more, make sure to also look at blackpenredpen’s videos on Fourier series, they’re an awesome supplement to this video!
@AsadAli-cr3ve5 жыл бұрын
Good ,carry on👏👏👏👏
@franciscojavierorozcobeiza93785 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peyam's Show I’ve watched of bprp and he should be expressed his alternating serie in terms of hyperbolic fncs as you... Awesome thank you for upload videos
@AndDiracisHisProphet5 жыл бұрын
Fouryay
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
AndDiracisHisProphet yayyayyayyay
@yaaryany5 жыл бұрын
@@blackpenredpen The god himself has commented ..
@imaginaryunit50565 жыл бұрын
Ohhh, it's awesome Let let me make a notice: We can sinh(2pi)/sinh^2(pi) invert to 2sinh(pi)*cosh(pi)/sinh^2(pi) and get 2cosh(pi)/sinh(pi) = 2cth(pi) The total is 1/2(pi*cth(pi)+1)
@scottgoodson82955 жыл бұрын
It's been noticed by other people, but the sum from -∞ to ∞ can be quite succinctly expressed as π*coth(π), which is arguably more amazing as it almost looks like it has a relationship with arctan (they are inverses in quite different ways to tanh and tan, respectively). Just a cool note!
@Czeckie5 жыл бұрын
word is that charles darwin noted "A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat which isn’t there" when he saw dr. Peyam struggling to keep the lights on.
@zachary70675 жыл бұрын
1:57 "𝜋 m x" I see what you did there :)
@triedtested87975 жыл бұрын
what did they do there? I was confused af ;-;
@zachary70675 жыл бұрын
@@triedtested8797 Whenever he used m instead of n, it sounded like he was saying his name, Peyam (with an extra x at the end).
@timothyaugustine70935 жыл бұрын
Lol pi am xoxo
@whythosenames5 жыл бұрын
4:39
@wduandy5 жыл бұрын
1:17 "WTF" hahahahahaha
@ffggddss5 жыл бұрын
Very nice! Thanks!! Even using Parseval's Theorem, which I've always been fond of! Suggestion: When you get a thing like sinh(2π)/sinh²π , use the double angle formula to simplify further - ½π sinh(2π)/sinh²π = ½π·2sinh(π) cosh(π)/sinh²π = π/tanh(π) ½π sinh(2)/sinh²(1) = ½π·2sinh(1) cosh(1)/sinh²(1) = π/tanh(1) Fred
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
That’s even prettier, thank you!
@ffggddss5 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam You're welcome; your derivation is also quite pretty! FYI, I see that "Imaginary Unit" arrived at much the same thing about a month ago. And BTW, tanh(π) = 0.99627208...; very close to 1. So ½(π/tanh(π) + 1) ≈ ½(π + 1) is a very good approximation. The exact sum is 2.07667404746858..., and fiddling with the partial sums, I find that it takes about a dozen terms to get up to 2. The approximation is ½(π + 1) = 2.07079632 Fred
@minagawargious5 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love your enthusiasm.
@Rundas694205 жыл бұрын
When the light went out, the math-ghost appeared and told you to fix your video description since there it says from 0 to 1 which would be 3/2 and therefore trivial. Also mathematicians don't kill 2 birds with one stone but rather 2 functions with one identity. xD
@がつかくん5 жыл бұрын
in japan,at a.m.4 but i don't care It was fantastic! thank u
@curtiswfranks5 жыл бұрын
Math literally slaughters birds!
@GreenMeansGOF5 жыл бұрын
7:48 I thought my phone locked. XD
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
Hahaha
@ffggddss5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, two power outages in one video! You guys should be more attentive in paying your electric bills!! ;-) Fred
@maxsch.65555 жыл бұрын
Same XD
@Shad0wWarr10r5 жыл бұрын
1/(n^2+1)
@emanuelmartinez35855 жыл бұрын
I love to evaluate infinite series ☺️...parseval identity is kind of Magic
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
Me too!!! 😄
@fotnite_ Жыл бұрын
Just had this as a homework problem, except we were using a theorem that allows you to calculate this via Residue Theorem
@IS-eb9lf4 жыл бұрын
If you do that with e^ax, than you can get formula for 1/(n^2 + a^2), it will be (pia*coth(pia)-1)/2a^2 The fun fact: everything works with complex numbers, so 1/(a^2-n^2) converges to the (pia*cot(pia)-1)/2a^2
@biswadeepghosh55685 жыл бұрын
Great work.
@shiina_mahiru_90675 жыл бұрын
Rooms always scared about your math 😂 The fact that the formula involve only pi but not pi^2 also amazed me
@jarikosonen40794 жыл бұрын
Title? Sum of 1/(1+n^2), not sum of 1/n^2+1... but it looks good results if needed somewhere or even if not needed. It looks this is same as 1/2 π coth(π) - 1/2. Not sure which one is simpler though. This looks solid proof even I couldn't follow all the steps. Can you find solution for sum 1 to infinity of 1/n^3 also (and the other odd powers)? This looks like zeta functions expansion... Zeta(-1)=-1/12 or zeta(0)=-1/2 is strange cases. It looks like there would be "overflow" in the positive realnumbers that will change the sign of the zeta function at zeta(1)~+/-infinity point. It looks like for 1/(n^2+b) sum giving: b | 0 | π^2/6 1 | 1/2 (π coth(π) - 1) 2 | 1/4 (sqrt(2) π coth(sqrt(2) π) - 1) 3 | 1/6 (sqrt(3) π coth(sqrt(3) π) - 1) ... b | 1/(2*b) (sqrt(b) π coth(sqrt(b) π) - 1)
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but nobody is gonna type parentheses when looking for a YT video...
@shanmugasundaram96885 жыл бұрын
The series converges to 2.076674.
@sundayscrafter17795 жыл бұрын
Hi there, there is a little something I do not understand. Isn’t the Fourier series expansion you are using in the beginning something true for functions 2Pi-periodic only? I mean, I have the feeling we have e^2Pi = e^0 with your development.
@giacomolanza17262 жыл бұрын
Fourier series can be applied either to periodic functions, or for functions defined within a closed interval. In the latter case the Fourier series is a good approximation of the starting function only within the interval (outside it it will approximate a periodic repetition of the considered arc of function)
@ferashamdan42525 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for your time sharing this proof. I did enjoy your descriptions.
@abolfazlmohammadpour14564 жыл бұрын
God bless you Dr
@lunaticluna90714 жыл бұрын
I have found a general formula for the integral of 1/(1+|x^n|) from -inf to inf. it is (2pi/n)*csc(pi/n)
@giacomolanza17262 жыл бұрын
Sound interesting - do you have a demonstration?
@danielmastalerz36405 жыл бұрын
Sir, you definitely deserve more subscribers!
@davidrheault78965 жыл бұрын
The solution simplifies to 1/2+1/2*pi*coth(pi) which is approx 2.076674048
@Contradi5 жыл бұрын
You are a gem.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Andrew H Agree!!!!!
@darkmask47672 жыл бұрын
Let a>0. The sum of 1/(n²+a²), n= 0 to infinity = π*coth(πa)/(2a)+1/(2a²). This can be calculated by finding the Fourier series of e^(ax) on (-π,π) and using Parseval's identity with e^(ax)
@Enrico-Migliore3 жыл бұрын
Great demo. Thanks.
@xCorvus7x5 жыл бұрын
8:52 Parseval, the hero of legend, knight at the Round Table, keeper of the Holy Grail of Analysis. Too bad that this result is just a special case somebody stumbled upon while doing Fourier analysis and not a result from the general solution for Σ a/(b+n^c) as n goes from 0 to ∞ (or -∞ to ∞) for complex a, b, c.
@michelkhoury14704 жыл бұрын
Very very nice solution 👍 I solved this by using also Parseval's Identity and this is a very very beautiful Identity with Fourier series 😉
@michelkhoury14704 жыл бұрын
But I took f(x)=exp(-x) but the proof is going to be similar since the module of (1-iN) is the same as the module of (1+iN)
@alephnull40445 жыл бұрын
"We're *literally* killing two birds with one stone." Birds were harmed in the making of this video.
@giannismaris135 жыл бұрын
Riemann is proud after this 😅
@gergodenes63605 жыл бұрын
You can take sinh(2pi)/sinh^2(2pi) to be 2*cth(pi), so that simplifies the expression to be (pi*cth(pi)+1)/2, it's a lot more beautiful than with sinh^2 and stuff
@xxnotmuchxx4 жыл бұрын
What about sum of 1 / (n^2 + 1/a) from n=1 to infinity?
@mihaly10275 жыл бұрын
I forget how many languages do you speak?
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
5 :)
@gorthorki5 жыл бұрын
Can you do this technique with other functions? I need more closed summation formulas 🤤
@davidrheault78965 жыл бұрын
We can apply this strategy on Zeta function as well to evaluate at integers, such as Zeta(4) = pi^4/90 by using the function f(x) = x^2
@112BALAGE1125 жыл бұрын
Excellent as always.
@ChefSalad5 жыл бұрын
There's a much better explanation for the -inx part of the Fourier coefficient formula than complex dot products needing to have a complex conjugate term. Imaging having f(x)=∑C(n)*e^(inx) . Then multiply both sides by e^(−imx)*dx for each m and take the integral. You get ∫f(x)e^(−imx)dx=...+∫C(m−1)*e^−ix*dx+∫C(m)*e^0*dx+∫C(m+1)*e^ix*dx+... The thing to notice is that ∫C(m)e^inx*dx=0 when n≠0 and ∫C(m)*e^inx*dx=2π*C(m) when n=0. This means that 2π*C(m)=∫f(x)*e^(−imx)*dx. The reason that this works is because sin(x) and cos(x) both integrate to zero over one complete period but e^0=1 which is a constant and so that one term doesn′t intergrate to zero. By multiplying all the terms by e^−imx, we make the term we want intergrate to 2πC(n) and all other terms integrate to zero. It has to be negative imx because the term we want is c(n)*e^inx, and when we multiply we get c(n)*e^(inx)*e^(−imx)=c(n)*e^(i(n−m)x). When n=m, then we get c(n)*e^(0) for the term we want but the other terms still have e^iqx and so integrate to zero. In other words, it needs to be negative to cancel out the positive we already have on the term we want.
@kqp1998gyy4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. Thank you 🌷
@thephysicistcuber1755 жыл бұрын
4:52 Hi Peyam!
@Goku17yen5 жыл бұрын
Hey Peyam, i have a quick question about your recording strategy. Do you connect the lapel mic to your phone and then record it there, and sync the audio separately with your camera, or are you recording the video with the same camera you have the mic in? Thanks so much
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
In my older videos I recorded the videos without a mic, just with the phone I have, but in my newer videos I record it with a mic, which is plugged in my phone. To this date I still don’t know if it makes a difference 😅
@Goku17yen5 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peyam's Show lmao ikr!! I can’t hear a difference so I’m wondering what’s the point of the mic lol, I tried it out with multiple mics as well, so it must not make much of a difference through all brands
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, bprp said the same thing to me! It must be a placebo effect or something 😂
@Goku17yen5 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peyam's Show for real, now I feel like I wasted a load of money on a bunch of mics!! Lol
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Goku17yen That's why I still use the ball.
@ajayananddwivedi71544 жыл бұрын
What to do if there is 2n^2 instead of n^2
@danielmilyutin99143 жыл бұрын
sinh(2x) = 2sinh(x)cosh(x). Thus, final formula can be simplified to ctgh(x).
@zivssps5 жыл бұрын
at the "also" part at the end, it's supposed to be 0.5 instead of pi/2.
@timurpryadilin88305 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peyam, can you please proof that there is no general formula for roots of polynomials with degree more or equal to 5. It sounds very interesting
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
Sadly I can’t, I know no Galois theory at all :(
@Nerdwithoutglasses3 жыл бұрын
Sir, is it possible to solve sum (n=0 to inf) 1/(n^4+1) or 1/(n^8+1) this way?
@Flanlaina4 жыл бұрын
Converges or diverges?
@brendanlawlor22145 жыл бұрын
Beautiful series compare with Euler sum for squares reciprocals being pi^2/6. Artists have no idea of the beauty of nature provided by math
@PackSciences5 жыл бұрын
8:36 Missed the opportunity to use the cardinal hyperbolic sine.
@quocanhnguyenle49525 жыл бұрын
This can be simplified to (π*cothπ+1)/2.
@lindsaywaterman20104 жыл бұрын
Sinh (2pi) = 2* Sinh(pi)* Cosh(pi). When Sinh (2pi) he substituted, a Sinh(pi) in the denominator is cancelled leaving a Coth(pi) with an additional factor of 2. Therefore, this reduces to the classical formula.
@jesalkotak55953 жыл бұрын
Sum of e^(-n)/(1+n^2) = ?
@djemidjma52745 жыл бұрын
Description says from 0 to 1. Fix ples
@Prasen17294 жыл бұрын
At 2:21, not so clearly explained why you put a 2. Though that's another reason to study Fourier coefficients but funny as hell at 7:41, it's not oh my gosh, it's oh my sinh. :-D
@carlosgiovanardi81974 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Very instructive, Peyam Tabrizian. By the way, i have the following doubt: is it possible to obtain a similar formula for other exponents (4, 6, ...) and for other numbers other than 1? For example: Sum of 1/(25+n^4) I appreciate any reference.
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure how, but I think it’s possible to do that
@carlosgiovanardi81974 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam, WA gives results in terms of digamma function 1/1+n^4 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%281%2Bn%5E4%29 1/1+n^6 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%281%2Bn%5E6%29 1/1+n^8 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%281%2Bn%5E8%29 1/25+n^4 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%2825%2Bn%5E4%29 1/25+n^6 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%2825%2Bn%5E6%29 1/25+n^8 www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum+1%2F%2825%2Bn%5E8%29 and when the exponent tends to infinity, sum tends to 0.5 or 1.5 depending on the initial term math.stackexchange.com/questions/2070991
@carlosgiovanardi81974 жыл бұрын
dear Peyam, I remind you about this subject. I will be very grateful if you have any further information about this kind of sums involving digamma functions.
@paulfoss53854 жыл бұрын
While I wasn't able to work out the closed form, I was able to find the value out to ten decimal places in a spread sheet. The series converges at a glacial pace, but I reasoned that the majority of the difference between the terms in 1/(n^2+1) and 1/(n^2) would occur at small values of n, as 1/(n^2)-1/(n^2+1)=1/(n^4+n^2). So I found the difference between (pi^2)/6 and the series 1/(n^2) and added it to one plus the series 1/(n^2+1). Not an elegant nor efficient method, but eh, it's what I could do. :/
@drpeyam4 жыл бұрын
Interesting!
@houdahbe55383 жыл бұрын
can u please help me sum of 1/sqroot of (n^2+in) i=0 to n ????
@xxnotmuchxx4 жыл бұрын
Wolframalpha says it is .5 pi coth(pi) - .5
@gnikola20135 жыл бұрын
Parseval himself came to Peyam to see his derivation, that's why the lights went out
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Kiritsu That must be it!!!
@mikeh2833 жыл бұрын
The third time I came here I came for the parseval identity.
@aneeshsrinivas8924 жыл бұрын
is there a closed form for ∑1/(n^4+1)
@robertoxmusica4 жыл бұрын
Yes: Compute '∑1/(n^4+1) from n=-∞ to ∞' with the Wolfram|Alpha website (www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%E2%88%911%2F%28n%5E4%2B1%29+from+n%3D-%E2%88%9E+to+%E2%88%9E) or mobile app (wolframalpha:///?i=%E2%88%911%2F%28n%5E4%2B1%29+from+n%3D-%E2%88%9E+to+%E2%88%9E).
@dgrandlapinblanc5 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Thanks.
@thephysicistcuber1754 жыл бұрын
Do this with complex analysis.
@srpenguinbr5 жыл бұрын
Typo on the tittle, should be 1/(1+n²)
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
It’s not a typo; people are usually too lazy to put parentheses when searching for a video
@mjthebest72944 жыл бұрын
Angel well no... it would be' divergent in that case :) Because (1 + 1/n²) > 1 for all n :)
@robertoiturralde29905 жыл бұрын
series (n!)/(2^n+1), n=1 to infinity, converge or diverge please help me to solve this.
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
Ratio test
@andreamonteroso85864 жыл бұрын
this is good!
@youshouleviathan16624 жыл бұрын
Curve Agnesi? Amazing
@LucaIlarioCarbonini4 жыл бұрын
@Dr Peyam I've tried to search for a video of yours about Perseval with no success. In case you have not made one yet may I suggest that subject for a video in your KZbin channel?
What I suggest is a proof of Perseval's theorem, I can remember bunches of inequalities waving all around and making me feel that I had to find a job...
@LucaIlarioCarbonini4 жыл бұрын
Found! kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6LOonaKrL6ip7c
@josephmartos5 жыл бұрын
1:10 i wanted to say "what the f*uck" is that... and you just wrote it down xD
@jadegrace13125 жыл бұрын
Wait why is this not pi²/6
@drpeyam5 жыл бұрын
It’s not the sum of 1/n^2
@jadegrace13125 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam oh right, I just assumed it was shifted over but that would mean the 1 was inside of the squared. That makes sense
@koushikbhattacharya37784 жыл бұрын
he is happy about something
@pablojulianjimenezcano43625 жыл бұрын
This is crazyyyyy
@tszhanglau57475 жыл бұрын
Probably some kids were playing with the switches...
@nestorv76275 жыл бұрын
ily
@LouisEmery2 жыл бұрын
WTF means "what to find"? I realize he is not a native English speaker.
@abderrahimabderrahim66594 жыл бұрын
coming from mr beast
@mathyland46324 жыл бұрын
same! I just used Wolfram alpha at the time, but now that the challenge is over, I'm curious where that answer comes from.