Supreme Court Issues 6-2 Decision Changing The Second Amendment ATF Fight Forever!

In this video I break down historic decisions in the Supreme Court that just changed the Second Amendment fight forever!
Ground News: groundnews.com...
Sign up for the Armed Scholar Newsletter: www.armedschol...
🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram: / armedscholaryt
Twitter: / armedscholaryt
Twitch: / armedscholar
📷 My KZbin Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii) amzn.to/36YIe96
Lens: (Tamron 17-28) amzn.to/3wSPn5H
Lighting: (GVM RGB) amzn.to/3zpDfdT
Microphone: (Rode Wireless) amzn.to/3iBgnkU
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom) amzn.to/2V7meWV
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!

[@ArmedScholar]

Ground News: groundnews.com/armedscholar Sign up for the Armed Scholar Newsletter: www.armedscholar.com/contact

[@starvedbaby2510]

I’m so curious as to why Jackson recused herself from this decision , yet put her 2 cents in the first round?

[@alexrodgers9247]

Wow, you truly look like a young version of Dom DeLuise! Just had to throw that in for good measure!

[@starvedbaby2510]

@@alexrodgers9247 I don’t think Dom ever had hair on his face ever

[@garypascucci5797]

@@starvedbaby2510 she was just being a woman... That she couldn't define with words

[@alexrodgers9247]

@@starvedbaby2510 True. I’m just calling it as i see. It’s the eyes, and cheeks. I miss those good ol comedians.

[@grumpyowl3515]

For forty years, the agencies had the opportunity to operate responsibly under Chevron. Instead, they chose to abuse the latitude that was granted to them. Now, law-making authority has been passed back to Congress, where it has belonged all along.

[@dayjeremy]

That's because when you give people a little power they get drunk on it.

[@Mountain_bonker]

@@dayjeremyGive em an inch they take a mile.

[@johncassani6780]

The kind of people who seek to become unelected bureaucrats are exactly the kind of people who should never have any power.

[@OnoMa-g6v]

Agency overreach is rampant. The USDA wants homeowners to register their gardens! It’s gone too far

[@garypascucci5797]

Now they can eat shit, while you harvest some delicious, nutritious , home grown food...😂

[@Lightning613]

Want?? They’ve been demanding it for over 2 years. In KommieFornia, landowners must also register their wells and have water (remotely read) meters placed on them so the STAiTEe can shut them off.

[@grandpagun2843]

Democrats

[@p99guy]

Thanks to Obama and Joe, the USDA has tactical teams and full auto firearms

[@Abdega]

@@p99guythere’s a joke about how International Harvester used to make guns and tractors in her somewhere but it’s just not coming to me

[@JdubbJdubb]

If the 2nd is not clear enough, there needs to be a constitutional amendment that will charge any politician, or anyone who is an employee of any agency who knowingly attempts to infringe on any constitutional amendment will be charged criminally, up to life in prison, and a substantial fine!

[@greg_austin]

Called "RICO."

[@joehopper3720]

@JdubbJdubb. That *statute* already exists, USC 18 §241- conspiracy against rights. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute.

[@greg_austin]

@@joehopper3720 ... and §242 forbids the conspiracy to violate Rights.

[@PhucHue-kb9bj]

Charged with treason!

[@StMiBll]

Or the People could secure their freedoms by making sure the transgressors do not survive their treason.

[@kevinclark8782]

Now lawsuits need to be filled against every rule made by agencies and not Congress.

[@cjones389]

Chevon falling is one the biggest landmarks in the history of the country.

[@DavidS-bm2st]

incredible number of The People were screwed by that Chevron deference

[@burninggearsmobilemechanic]

Next civil asset forfeiture needs to go byby.

[@joshuarichard6827]

It changes nothing

[@andredaedone7732]

​@@DavidS-bm2stJust the Marxist Agencies.

[@andredaedone7732]

​@@joshuarichard6827Oh yes it does. Watch the lawsuits start to fly.

[@zexnynex777]

In most cases it seems like they don't care though. Putting tape on the doorbell camera. Turning off body cams. Not exactly "legit" behavior. Sadly.

[@motorcitymadman146]

Right. Its only good if its ENFORCED.

[@Lightning613]

“not legit behavior “ ??? appeared like downright planned murder to an outside observer . . .

[@dayjeremy]

That's why you have your obvious cameras and your hidden cameras.

[@ThingsThatIDo]

This was a HUGE "W" returning power back to elected officials instead of bureaucrats

[@ArmedScholar]

🇺🇸👍

[@ChaohsiangChen]

What about the legislative impudence? Like all the infringements in CA.

[@AngusScobie]

@@ChaohsiangChenand New York…

[@absolutetuber]

@@ChaohsiangChen people need to get serious about voting out those that infringe rights. Even corrupt democrats in California would learn to respect the constitution if the people vote accordingly.

[@bmphil3400]

It hasn't returned anything yet. People will still have to sue based on this ruling. Just like the various state laws and Bruen.

[@shanekump5228]

The sole purpose of government, at any level, is to serve the people that created it for the protection of the rights and property of the people. It was not created to extract money out of the people to serve its own ends.

[@doubletap1headshot]

Excellent decision! Finally, a court that knows how to interpret the law according to the letter of the law!

[@chuckmiller5763]

40 years of the USA going downhill fast just hit the brakes. Its time to get that 40 years back.

[@michaeltaylor4984]

@@chuckmiller5763 It will take 100 years to get it back

[@Scruffyman81]

With the end of chevron deference, does that mean the people can sue California for that new 11% tax?

[@mutantryeff]

All the agencies can have their budgets cut after Chevron being gone.

[@jayp4114]

Good luck with Mike Johnson and Hakeem Jeffries in charge

[@theoryofpersonality1420]

It's legal to not pay taxes for three years. If collectively everyone in the country doesn't pay their taxes for three years (which is legal) in a silent protest it will cripple big government. It will send a clear message. They will have to limit the government to the bare minimum.

[@nathanielmohr9622]

@@theoryofpersonality1420It is not legal. You may not go to prison immediately, but you'll build fines, fees, and interest.

[@DavidS-bm2st]

@@theoryofpersonality1420 I know people who Never Paid taxes and are stinking filthy rich because of it

[@ssnerd583]

DHS already did...did ya see that one??

[@user-xc6wd3hb4s]

Since the Court has adjudicated that the actions of these agencies are in violation of the law, and have violated the rights of the American people, what is the remedy? Fine? Prison terms? Both? There are very real damages, and people who were hired to PROTECT our rights did just the opposite. They violated our rights, and they need to pay a penalty for that.

[@GarlandFarms]

@user-xc6wd3hb4s Exactly. Additionally, wouldn't these violations of law also be considered treason?

[@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle]

18 241 and 242. The laws already exist to punish them. We just need a prosecutor to charge them..

[@DavidS-bm2st]

Agreed, they should be paying Huge Fat Penalties to bankrupt federal government permanently

[@DavidS-bm2st]

@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle good luck with that

[@Demonslayer-vt9lm]

Nothing will happen it's all a circus act

[@AllAboutSurvival]

It's crucial to see how this will shape future ATF regulations and our rights as gun owners.

[@dayjeremy]

ATF can no longer make regulations. That's the beauty of this ruling.

[@markl8111]

There's a positive aspect to getting rid of Chevron. Federal agencies will no longer need staff, lawyers sitting in the basement figuring out new rules. Federal Budgets can be cut drastically 😂 since the creation of laws are created in congress. We can cut budgets by billions.

[@gd_gnz]

Thank you for the updates!! Can’t wait to get our freedom back!!

[@ArmedScholar]

Thanks for watching!

[@TRUTHBYFACT-hd8rs]

What’s needed is for We The People to be able to carry! 😊 Remove the lies , deceit and corruption!

[@taasch2505]

You ARE able to carry; in all 50 states. It's time for people to get the memo. Free men don't ask permission. A right delayed is a right denied.

[@josephnoll2754]

​@@taasch2505 carry yes... but loaded, not in a few states...

[@whatif3500]

We the People CAN carry. It’s our right - everyone keeps waiting until they give us the go ahead. Why?? They don’t give us the right - the right is already ours.

[@axiomfiremind8431]

AIPAC disagrees and the vows to end the constitution and 2A.

[@curve5746]

Exactly! My life is worth the risk​@@taasch2505

[@cjvan713]

I know this is a gun channel and is about the ATF overreach, but One of the first lawsuits about this same type of agency overreach was against the EPA. They were making rules to act like laws by any means in the name of the environment. I hope people understand how good this decision really is as a whole and how dangerous things were becoming.

[@prjndigo]

The main problem with the ATF trying to use Chevron Deference was *CHEVRON DEFERENCE WAS NOT TO BE USED BY THE GOVERNMENT*

[@mexicantraveleronabudget1196]

Tired of all this bullshit already. We need the court to just say all gun laws violate the 2nd amendment and be done with it.

[@yankeedoodle7693]

justices are still government.

[@youknow9092]

That will never happen

[@513Canyon]

You are the checks and balances

[@anash578]

🗣️FACTS!!!! That’s simple asf. Then take it on a case by case bases if a person shld have there ( RIGHT ) withheld.

[@ArakakiDojoMatsubayashiS-km5uc]

Amen to that!

[@eytrix]

"We are going to pit a government employee on your boat, and you have to pay their wages" Sounds like some local waterways need some tea.

[@DarkMatterX1]

Then you'll get the EPA after you.

[@sethalexander3164]

Thomas Jefferson"… Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

[@sethalexander3164]

That government is best which governs least." "The people cannot delegate to government the power to do anything which would be unlawful for them to do themselves." "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely

[@stephenarmstrong7354]

Not discounting other concerns, my question is in what universe is a government employee earning $700 a day. Put them in a dingy towed behind the fishing boat.

[@flipadoo]

Chevron Deference was literally an abjuration of the courts responsibilities. The checks and balances ideal of our Constitutional republic cannot work without the checks, and that is the role of the courts. It's about time they accepted their responsibilities.

[@humphrybolgart1020]

Why are we still paying for these agencies who violate our rights?

[@theoryofpersonality1420]

It's legal to not pay taxes for three years. If collectively everyone in the country doesn't pay their taxes for three years (which is legal) in a silent protest it will cripple big government. It will send a clear message. They will have to limit the government to the bare minimum.

[@christopherball7937]

One word, DEMOCRATS

[@joshuarichard6827]

@@christopherball7937REPUBLICANS and Democrats are the same

[@Demonslayer-vt9lm]

​@@theoryofpersonality1420 Good idea

[@vayabroder729]

@@christopherball7937Marxocrats.

[@jasperriley3923]

About time. Unelected people making rules that are enforced like a law is bullshit.

[@michaelmeyer5347]

Thought Chevron Deference was just deemed unconstitutional....2 or 3 days ago, scotus ruled unconstitutional after 40 yrs.

[@scottsozmtns7534]

That’s like having a “Political Officer”, on every boat in the Soviet Union! That’s a load of horse-t! F-king ATF doesn’t respect “We the People”, at all! Sooner we “deal” with them the better this nation will be! I’m a C&R Class 03 & I am renewing my license & got this list of stuff that quite frankly is B.S.! I’ve had that license for almost 20yrs & now they’re acting like I’m some kind of danger, political enemy or crazy nut job type. The sooner the ATF is dealt with the better off the country will be!!!!

[@DS-sn9jk]

FJB and the ATF.

[@byronperry6014]

And DJT.

[@DS-sn9jk]

@@byronperry6014 get back in your hole... back (sprays with squirt bottle)

[@tim3172]

@@RW-xj7bl "and you are mom" "I *LOVE* the poorly-educated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

[@byronperry6014]

​@@RW-xj7blwow watch out little boy before your mommy washes your mouthout with soap.

[@RW-xj7bl]

@@byronperry6014 🤣

[@snunya9399]

Thanks for the video. What wasn't touched on is that for decades now, whenever a statue or rule was involved in a lawsuit, Chevron was the agencies defense, and part of that defense included the agency essentially saying "take it up with Congress for passing a vague law". When Congress is approached for the same matter, their response has always been "take it up with the Agency for the unelected bureaucrats implementing rules and statutes that were not the intent of the law". Now, finally, Congress will have to do the job we elected them for. They will have to pass well defined, unambiguous laws and to do this, it will have to have the approval of the House, the Senate, and the President. Agencies will no longer be able to implement new laws under the false premise of rules and statutes without facing legal challenges they know they will lose. Now...what does this change right now? Nothing. Until each and every one of these illegal rules and statutes are litigated, or until Congress gets off its lazy ass and defines their vague laws, it will be a long, slow uphill battle to remove this unelected power from agencies. The only people that benefit during this process are attorneys. We the people, will continue to pay for the agencies defense of these upcoming lawsuits.

[@davidwood2205]

Absolutely zero compliance from me...

[@rongrindstaff3027]

It was UNCONDITIONAL in 84 and still is that is why it's gone,

[@pantarkan7]

The problem with "rational" or "reasonable" tests is the same with any subjective test; it's subjective. It's like the "justice" system we have; "justice" itself is a subjective term.

[@greenman4508]

The definition of ambiguous is waaay too ambiguous

[@bradleywester7598]

This ruling kicked the Administrative State in the teeth and paved a path back to ok Constitutional Republic for coming changes

[@andycap1980]

Good to see the Supreme Court continuing to make good decisions reining in the federal government little by little!

[@Mouthwashh]

This is only happening now because Trump fixed the Supreme Court during his 1st term. We need to get him back in office.

[@yesiamarussianbot3076]

So that rule would cost them 7000 extra per 10 days of fishing, which is absolute insanity.

[@evancurtis]

You think those are insane. Go look into these two cases where the EPA directly targeted fellow Americans over environmental rules first one (johnson vs epa)

[@curly__3]

This goes well beyond federal bureaucracy. It is ruled on the basis that bureaucracy cannot be trusted to point the direction legally on constitutional issues. So in essence, this has removed all state and local government power to use deference in making laws that are federal court jurisdiction...like anything that has to do with the 5th amendment and the 2nd amendment, etc...

[@PumpkinKingXXIII]

It will be interesting to see if the ATF honors this or its business as usual. According to the guy with rare bread they have been ignoring an injunction. ATF pulling the Eric Cartman “Whatever Whatever I Do What I Want!”

[@Asertix357]

With the ATF it's always business as usual. They've been allowed to make laws without congressional action for far too long, and they're not going to give it up no matter what.

[@kennithnieman9130]

My wife found this channel and subscribed for me. This is great! Pretty much the understandable facts and what's important today. Nice job.

[@user-ui7zp5fr8z]

Huge Decision….absolutely RIGHTEOUS

[@bondj001]

Anthony, you are doing extremely well helping us understand these court decisions.

[@DOGWOMAN55]

maybe a chance for reversals so that my 22lr and 17hmr are no longer classified as ASSUALT WEAPONs.

[@joshuarichard6827]

Free men don’t ask for permission

[@Demonslayer-vt9lm]

​@@joshuarichard6827 Neither do rapists so the line should be drawn somewhere. It's called self government.

[@DarkMatterX1]

​@@Demonslayer-vt9lm Wtf kind of lamebrained, sub-80 iq false equivalence is this?

[@joshuarichard6827]

@@Demonslayer-vt9lmno

[@KodysGarage]

No more ATF! They should just be overlooking paperwork and sending out stamps for suppressors.

[@ArmedScholar]

100%

[@zachscott4867]

😆 they should just send all the confiscated ones out as a bonus with the paperwork.

[@PropsandWings]

They should be nothing more than a convince store with little power.

[@Southpawarsenal]

No, just paperwork. A suppressor is just a gun muffler. You don’t see the government charging $200 for a car muffler. Abolish the NFA

[@gregrising3668]

No paperwork no tax stamps no laws regulating arms of free citizens.

[@charlesnadeau6260]

Hello from maine, another day of misdirection and double standards!

[@jammerlr7780]

Bullshit

[@randalljames1]

and a guy still sits in prison because of a business card.... come on guys... join forces and get this kid out of the pokey.. Shouldn't the end of this over reach cause a change in the case status of someone sent to prison because of the over reach?

[@derrick9605]

You and I both know that wasn't just a business card brother.

[@kennethstaszak9990]

@@derrick9605 So the metal was too thin to be useful, the etched lines were nowhere near the right place to actually function and the only way the ATF got a firearm to fire more than one round was when the gun jammed because of all their screwing around with the gun. If you think that constitutes a machine gun you aren't too bright.

[@michaeltaylor4984]

​@@derrick9605Do you live in the Dimly Lit Zone?

[@password6025]

​@@derrick9605it was an out of scale drawing of something that can't be readily made into a lightning link without modification.

[@northernerlivingthedream7373]

@@derrick9605 Naw brother, you’re the only dim bulb here!

[@clarkwilson6340]

The Main problem is that none of these Agencies were created to make laws; Any Regulations that they impose carry the force of law so therefore all of them should have to go to congress in a bill and be decided there; The framers and until the Communist FDR came into power never intended these agencies to make laws only to carry out the day to day function;

[@robertpronovost3839]

Once the bill arrives we need transparency and people’s vote on them. It’s our country but we all got to get our asses and vote.

[@Doctor_Tor]

Defund the ATF!!!!

[@dennyoconnor8680]

The EPA has been a problem for me. There is a low spot in a 40 acre corn field that is wet spring and fall, for a couple of weeks. This field has been cultivated since the 1800's. A few decades back they marched in and declared a half acre in the middle of the field a wet land. I pay taxes on it but I am forbidden to work it. Of course the cotton wood trees grew like weeds in the fertile , cultivated soil reaching 80 feet high. The Federal Court has refused to hear an appeal citing Chevron. Given this ruling I will be demanding that they remove the wet land designation.

[@markyoung2981]

Thank you for all the time and effort you put into explaining these important civil rights.

[@humphrybolgart1020]

If government officials come on your land act accordingly. Do not comply.

[@spyker_aileron]

I can't wait for this to be ignored outright.

[@albertkc2007]

Time for SCOTUS to see that CANS are devices designed to prevent hearing damage and should be available to all citizens if not mandated.

[@DarkMatterX1]

I draw the line at mandating. You don't get to tell another man what he has to have done to his own property.

[@Survivor73]

⛽️🚀🗽🇺🇸🙏 Pray hard and fight on!

[@ArmedScholar]

⛽🚀

[@joshuarichard6827]

I have seen zero fighting

[@rosemaryabbott1020]

I'm thankful to you for explaining this so well.

[@dawnfire5600]

I love the straight forward reporting with only clarification added instead of endless editorials. Thank you

[@hedonisticpunkvatos]

That whole herring boat thing is the kinda stuff our Founders went to war with England.

[@bpdono]

I love that it’s fishermen, some of the hardest people out there, being where the bullshit stops. Like our trucker friends in Canada - grounded people.

[@joshuarichard6827]

@@bpdonothe truckers changed nothing

[@chcagr]

Great news. Thank you for unpacking it for us.

[@phyllisclark3896]

Thanks for the news Anthony ❤️🙏

[@Brian-kn9wm]

Glad to hear you were at Gun-Con, I wish I could have watched, but... work. One of these days I'll have time to go back and watch the replays of the panel discussions!

[@Microwave_King]

Looks like your health regiment is paying off. Looking good, my man. Keep up that good work.

[@pyreneesfarm7818]

chevron deference seems to replicate the concept in England that the opinion of the Crown takes priority over the citizen

[@DarkMatterX1]

For all intents and purposes, it was. What chevron did was create an automatic assumption in law that the government is always right. That's why overturning it was so important.

[@originalscottfree]

Thank you Anthony, I always appreciate your videos. Keep up the good work!

[@ddruprup12ify]

The ATF will ignore the Supreme Court’s ruling.

[@DavidS-bm2st]

I think you are right, it's like flipping them off like the lower courts and other state legislatures have taken to doing like new york keeps coming back with more obviously unconstitutional new laws

[@DM_Bluddworth]

If they do that then the SCOTUS should reject or overturn every case the ATF files in any court.

[@joshuarichard6827]

@@DM_Bluddworthshould but won’t

[@nathanblaylock8186]

And the American people will ignore the ATF. They have no real power.

[@brianbates9425]

All executive branch agencies will, to some extent, ignore and test the limits of this decision. But this give the people more power to challenge that and end it when it occurs via the courts.

[@CMe828]

Thank you for the analysis and keeping us updated. Invaluable. ❤

[@mariatorres9789]

WHOA. Something I finally understand! This is great news!

[@stevenofalltrades8553]

Imagine it taking decades to rule that laws must be established by the legislative branch by the voice of the people

[@seb6814]

watching you and your videos makes me believe that this country will get straight at one point .people need to hear and see clarity ///

[@jayp4114]

The Feds have unlimited budgets, and the ability to slow walk cases through the syatem. I remain hopeful, but skeptical until proven otherwise.

[@Lightning613]

just like KommieFornia, they’ll use the taxpayers’ $$$$$ to fight us and deprive us of our rights.

[@jimmybutler1379]

Very good decssion by supreme court judges !...

[@billclancy4913]

Then the 9th circuit will misunderstand the decision and come up with silly explanations that keep their decisions in force..."It depends upon what your definition of, "is" is.

[@ryt2ber]

This is truly great news. It naturally always takes me back to my original baseline questions; which are a) how in the hell do such obvious absurdities such as Chevron ever take hold? By definition it is so obviously ridiculous. It’s saying - if something isn’t clear - just let the agency (govt) interpret it like it “wants”, which is of course at the core, antithetical to the constitution which is in essence, a limiting entity to what the govt “thinks” vs what is defined as “rights inalienable to citizens”. So again - how is this allowed!? Then it hangs around for decades?? B) how is it every liberal justice rules in opposition to the basic constructs of the constitution? The Constitution just isn’t THAT complicated. And it doesn’t define the Constitution as an “outline” of what may be “right or wrong”, further subject to interpretation of (once again) govt. I’ll have to read the dissent to see the logic. What did the liberal justices say? “Well if we get rid of Chevron, then govt agencies will have a harder time ruling against the Constitutions main constructs so we should leave it in place so agencies such as xyz can just run ramshod over the citizens without accountability !?!?!” I mean hell is that what they’re saying?? Cause that’s what they mean!!

[@charlietwigg5139]

Celebrate this great and informed decision!

[@patwalsh2868]

Anthony, another Great Video !!! !! 💥🔫 thanks from Commy Ct.🇺🇸

[@marcofguzman3075]

Absolutely fantastic thank you for your information on this matter and subject 😀

[@Michael-dr9wl]

Now time to defund, dismantle, and abolish all unconstitutional Federal agencies’ if alcohol, tobacco and firearms are legal, why do we need unconstitutional Federal agencies?????

[@ArsacioJJulioJr]

Thank you. Excellent turn out.

[@georgeferlazzo7936]

Hello, Armed Scholar Thank you for another Great Video 👍 Finally, something that makes sense. Even We the People can understand and as these issues become something we will Vote On. Hopefully, We the People are ready and able and willing 🙏

[@64samsky]

Thank you, Anthony .

[@slickwillie9526]

The Oinking Swine overreached repeatedly and now get slammed way back. They should have stopped whilst they were ahead.

[@greg1516]

Thanks Anthony

[@ArmedScholar]

Thanks greg for watching like always!

[@lookwhatisaw]

How does this affect stuff like fore arm vertical attachments ​@@ArmedScholar

[@GradyEpperly]

Great news! Thanks for the synopsis.

[@Revolver1701]

This should put the specifics of the laws to be enforced back in congress to write the details of the laws to be enforced.

[@HarleyGuru1977]

Anthony, if I was a betting man, my money is you finished top of your law school! Thank you for making the complicated understandable. You are so fluid in your speech and your knowledge is unmatched.

[@adamaxe1]

I've been waiting for you to interpret this. You're the reason I knew what Chevron was.

[@CSSstravag]

Today is a good day for good news!

[@krap101]

I saw a funny video the other day where this lady was ranting about how undoing Chevron was a huge blow to our rights... Was pretty confused...

[@fatgreyman183]

For the Algorisms Thank You Anthony 👍😎👍

[@jimjersey2345]

This channel is awesome. Very informative and truthful. God bless your channel 🙏

[@rich_traveler3657]

Thank you for your persistent coverage and interpretation of these rulings.

[@nina_g6857]

Great news! So basically Chevron gave the FED agencies the last word on anything they wanted to control and/or restrictions on.

[@DaOzMan0608]

I hate how SCOTUS makes decisions that affect the second amendment in a backdoor way without addressing it directly

[@slshusker]

Great video. Government agencies have been writing their own laws.

[@MarkArrand-cf4cl]

A MAJOR victory.

[@LowKeyProductionz]

They need to change the Mary Jane question on the background form next. These laws are confusing as hell

[@joshuarichard6827]

They need to remove background checks

[@deanwheeler2302]

Thanks for the update! 😊

[@bocat7482]

I was in the Chemical/Oil industry for 38 years, the fugitive emission standards have always been overreach.

[@randysmeltz3339]

This goes a long way towards reaffirming my faith in OUR SUPREME COURTS !!!!

[@RicardoGonzalez-ww3ov]

I wish the Supreme Court would clarify if states are able to make gun laws because our nation is held together by our Constitution which is Federal law .