Supreme Justice with Judge Karen - Housewives Charity Fashion Show & Organized Mess

[@judyburnette9626]

Thank you Judge Karen for your kindness

[@Charlene-fi1sr]

I agree with the ruling, and Judge Karen is so generous, offering to donate her gowns. I'm surprised that the plaintiff didn't have personal insurance to cover the loss of her expensive dresses. And those 2 custom dresses were so tacky and unattractive!

[@mistiinseattle]

According to Google this show pays the judgments. Besides, there was no proof those ugly dresses were worth $5k. But how neat of JK to donate her dresses

[@MedOKC]

1st case: Plaintiff is an A$$. The judge NEVER made any effort to determine IF those dresses were REALLY worth $5000 . . .didn't know these things APPREICATED in value! . . .apparently so.

[@sherreefelstead4013]

I adore JK. She is so genuine, but tough. I find in case #1 JK was right about the plaintiff - just about the gowns and not the meaning of the charity. Case # 2 the audacity of the pompous defendant. Glad she brought him down a notch.

[@leonidasspyropoulos849]

That was not fair, The clothes were touching the donations box and I would also assume that are part of the donation. At least the amount should had been half.

[@RonaldWright-p4j]

Well if you done the same job where donations are always placed in a box why now would it change so it was a valid judgement

[@leonidasspyropoulos849]

@@RonaldWright-p4j because they placed on top of the box hanging so that they don't get rincled. Do not forget that the clothes were not just touching, took at least one third of the box surface.

[@jonathantyner171]

11:46 18:08

[@jacquelinecassidy7672]

This second case the defendant is a cheap skate. His disrespectful

[@MedOKC]

NOPE . . it was the PLAINTIFF who was the cheapskate and tried to cheat him out of his EARNED PAY.