Swami Vivekananda on Buddha and Adi Shankaracharya | Jay Lakhani |

Visit: www.hindu-academy.com for more information. Join our Whatsapp Broadcast Group by sending a Whatsapp message to: [phone] or click this link: jo.my/hinduacademy
Hindu Academy aims to promote a Comprehensive and Rational vision of Hinduism incorporating ideas of Religious Pluralism, Spiritual Humanism, and resonance between Science and Spirituality. It operates with the education establishments by working with schools colleges and universities as well as in the mainstream media.
The role and relevance of Hinduism in contemporary society
Hinduism has a great deal to contribute towards the spiritual health of the modern world. Its inherent pluralistic teachings offer the best resolution to how people of different religions can co-exist peacefully in a multi-faith society. Hinduism even allows for spirituality to be explored in non-religious modes, making teachings relevant and interesting for the youth of today. Family values promoted by Hinduism can foster more stable family units and better community cohesion. The reconciliation between the truth claims of a science-oriented worldview and a religiously oriented worldview is obligatory in this century. The Hindu Academy invokes findings at the cutting edge of modern sciences to promote this reconciliation.
Please Like and Share our videos and subscribe to our KZbin Channel: / hinduacademy
You can also join the conversation on our social media channels:
Facebook: / hinduacademy
Linkedin: / jay-lakhani-spiritual-...
Twitter: / hinduacademy
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "How to reconcile Dvaita with Advaita ?"
• How to reconcile dvait...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
#hinduism #jaylakhani #hinduacademy
#JayLakhani #HinduismExplained #HinduAcademy

[@shantijanakiraman4728]

The Heart Of Guru Adi Shankar is so Compassionate and broad that a common people like me get carried away in Bakti listening to his Shlokas and make me paatra to acquire the grace of God.

[@parmar__12]

Yes bro people forget he was one the biggest bhakta

[@dayanthahewawitharana1341]

Sanka racharya great teacher Budda is the symbol of compassion

[@dayanthahewawitharana1341]

No god No hell No hevan All are in mind

[@aman6980]

​@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 na dude shankaracharya was not at all selfish

[@mr.gamerkabir8142]

@@dayanthahewawitharana1341 who said it? Everyone is in god Bhagavad gita 9.4 and 9.5 confirms it Our body is made up of Gross body Subtle body CONSISTING OF MIND Casual body And ATMA which is the ultimate reality and no lines drawn between YOU AND GOD Subtle body is as real as this materialistic realm

[@veenaravindra1126]

🚩Jai Adi shankarcharya 🚩

[@adionai]

this man is an angel. thank you

[@HinduAcademy]

Thank you, if you want to learn Hinduism in structured manner please enrol on to our free course on Hinduism, here is the link: hindu-academy.coachzippy.com/

[@sharathsunder2686]

Shankaracharya's first composition is Kanakadhara Stotra, which was born out of compassion towards a poor woman. Acharya bowed down and accepted a chandala as his guru, so your comments about him being partial towards Brahmins isn't actually factual. Acharya is Karuna Sagara, the absolute field of compassion. Sir, please take back your words.

[@Gopinathk17]

Well said!! That's exactly what I felt. Adi Shakara is man of intellect and with highest level of compassion. He is a sarvagna and a man of perfection. He condemned Buddhism based on vedic principles and tried to make them realize that they are also part of Sanathana dharma for which the basis is Vedas.

[@harshraj5514]

Jai Adi Shankaracharya 🙏🙏🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️🚩🚩🚩.

[@ge0m051]

I visited Kedarnath October 2022. Stunning to be at Adi Shankaracharya's Mahasamadhi. All heart for me there, even though his intellect is what drew me there (among other things) as an American who had never been to India before. What I understand of Adi Shankaracharya's teaching is not elitist. It comports with my own experience. Some people just don't have the capacity for deep intellectual contemplation. For those who do, that's often good enough to just practice Dharana. For those without the educational development for deep thought, i.e. everyone but the elites, Shankaracharya recommended Japa, Puja, Bhajan, etc., which are devotional practices. However, Shankaracharya's greatest debate had him confounded because he admittedly had not lived a fully human life (i.e. had never been a householder, etc.) whereas Buddha had done so. So, Shankarahcarya supposedly took the form of a dying king to gain that experience and round out his understanding of the human experience. So, it's not that Shankaracharya lacked compassion. Not at all. He simply lacked a certain context with regard to compassion, as in you don't know a man until you have walked in his shoes.

[@user-vi5dn3wn7p]

But Shankaracharya was realised person. He even never claimed that he is God although Brahmins knew many things

[@wesleyteenwesley]

Pranaam 🙏

[@KIRA-hp9ku]

Namo buddhay Jay adi guru shankaracharya 🙏🕉️🚩☸️

[@liberalManifesto68]

Respected Sir, To my mind Buddha was the greatest intellect and also full of Karuna... My father is a Brahmin and practicing Hindu, I gave up all of my identity.

[@tivo3720]

So poor of you. Learn Maha Prabhu Sri Chaitanya

[@udujjaldas]

Adi Shankaracharya told everyone is brahman means we should look everyone as a Brahman... think how much kindness he had ,he fell infront of a chandala because he was also a Brahman...but swami vivekananda followed advaita Vedanta

[@youtubeaccount1134]

Advait vedant is from veda vyasa😹, shankara was against shudras

[@SaiSai-cq3zz]

@@youtubeaccount1134 shankara didn't saw any differences.

[@seekersudarshan2078]

@@youtubeaccount1134 it was their time period.

[@rupeshpandey1059]

@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 Lol he's not lower than buddha. He's greater than buddhism. He destroyed buddhism very badly. Stop crying

[@maryfloyd7791]

Love it!!!!!

[@paramshabdam2332]

A really solid answer!

[@shivamumbai1]

Great Adi shankara was also full of compassion.His path was to treat on root level ie through knowledge and not on superficial temporary aid level.Bhaja Govindam for people came out by compassion only.

[@Kaivalya-samahitachittah]

Videos are coming out awesome these days. I'm so blessed to get to listen to Sir Lakhanis lectures. 😇💐

[@binodroka1]

Very knowledgeable information.🌺👏

[@sanjibmcu1012]

Buddha is Buddha, can't/should not compare with anyone even Adi Shankar. Namo Buddhaya

[@rupeshpandey1059]

Lol buddha was a theif. He steal everything from Hinduism and start his own religion. Remember Adi shankaracharya ji destroyed whole buddhism in one go.

[@Gopinathk17]

In the same way Adi Sankara is Adi Sankara..he can't be compared with anyone. They are two greatest beings walked on the planet. One we feel reincarnation of Vishnu and other one is reincarnation of Shiva.

[@abdeviliers6976]

So please don't disrespect Buddha by comparing him with anyone

[@iamallthatiiz3055]

What a wonderful clip. A perfect explanation

[@snehmukherjee9281]

Nobody could have explained it better .. 🙏

[@bitopantalukdar9820]

Jay Lakhani ji knows much more about hindu philosophy than many so called impostor gurus

[@nirguna4826]

Sri Buddha denied Atma, He insisted that there is no Atma, and he also did not want to say anything about God, so making his followers in the future deny the existence of God. That is why Adi Shankara threw Buddhism away from India and established the teaching of Upanisads which telling us Atma is the God the Lord inside every one of us. Without Adi Shankara, our world would be biased on the perception of God. Atma is the Truth we can experience but strangely Buddha denied it, up to now I feel surprised that is why I highly respect Buddhism but also very careful about their teaching because like Hinduism without Upanisads, there are a lot of lies in Buddhism.

[@samarthachaitanya2500]

True..but the discussion comparing compassionate aspect of bhuddist and shankara view point is misplaced. Both budha and shankara are equally compassionate and practically demonstrated in their lives. One greatness about Shri Adi Shankara is at the gross root level he taught dwaita to people by way of his devotion to Vishnu by writing Bhasya to Vishnu sahasranam, gave shivaananda lahari, govinda stuthi and also praised the mother nature through great work of Saundarya Lahari. He tried to uplift the level of bhakti from dwaita or murthi aradhana to advanced techniques of poorna or paratatwa as per advaitha. It would be wrong to call him mere by the proponent of advaitha phylosophy. Moreover, he used NETHI NETHI just to say about objective world only keeping in view of ultimate one truth calling para or Brahma, but did not deny existence of truths of objective world. He was compassionate and totally observed in surrender to chandala and blessed poor lady with kanakadhara. Discussions, therefore are no doubt more intellectual but lack some crucial elements of both dwaita, Advaita, and nothingness aspect of Buddha.

[@dushyanthabandarapalipana5492]

Thanks!

[@ivonsmith2024]

very clear understanding for people to grasp...

[@SatyaSanathani]

I wish the audio were good. I have to increase the volume to very high level to listen to this wonderful video

[@milimandalkundu5242]

Great explanation. 🙏🙏🙏

[@HinduAcademy]

Glad it was helpful!

[@jats4utube]

Great work. Just need to ditch the subtitles across all vids, errors galore! For people who can't understand verbal English it's a major issue.

[@rajeev9638]

I Also felt the same. Great Explanation. I am blessed to discover this channel.

[@baskaransubramanian2908]

Useless and irrelevant comment that Shankarar missed compassion. How does he base this? Who said Buddha was compassionate ? Buddist MONKS ROLLED a vedic scholar from the top of the hill because he questioned them, that is compassion?

[@ajitsinhmori8636]

Sir, you tried your best to sinthesize Hinduism and Buddhism...

[@SATYUG3z]

DON'T fall for the British-style of Divide and Rule. Hinduism is the quest of Spirituality and englobes Buddhism and Jainism. These are successful vehicles to Enlightenment that have already proved themselves.

[@ajaydalaya2195]

Buddhism is the echo of vedanta

[@DattaMusics]

@@ajaydalaya2195 .. as much as I love abhinav Gupta krishnananda agambagish Sri ramkrishna Dev I would say Gautam Buddha was more compassionate than adisankara it does not matter what he calls it matters how much his heart is broad what does heart was brought he could shower the other person with love not just with intellect in that contacts Dr Jay lakhani was absolutely right and I agree Buddha second name is compassion adishankara is more about sadhana Brahma jaati brahmavidya tapasya and all the the superior stuff that comes with being a spiritual person and I don't blame him for that he is a fantastic writer of fantastic poety fantastic writer of shatakas a wonderful tantra sadhaka, jnani but in terms of compassion Buddha crosses all limits is compassionate he is peace is very fragrance is that of peace compassion something which I cannot alienate in even one bit , in my remotest possibility, I can alien guru mahaveer for instance I can alienate Jesus without batting an eye but Buddha no man!! I have given my support to upward and indic academy but my hindutv stops there for me Buddha is love buddham saranam gacchami!!!

[@skullshotskullshot8572]

fire himdusim.is liabary bhuddism cover only one aspect of life bhuddism is kid of hindusim, hindusim cover science , maths , meditation, medicine , war , physicology each and everything

[@TheLastOutlaw289]

Buddhism I just a mor refined form of Advaita but both are preceded by concepts in Upanishads. Gotama himself called his teaching Brahmayana (Path to Brahman or Path to the absolute).

[@mukundamin2621]

My best Friend Rajeev is asking questions to Jay Lakhani, Rajeev has a Brilliant Mind and ability to understand the Truth ,

[@bibhutikumarjha952]

Good correlation between Buddhism and Hinduism

[@varshasubramanian5695]

I didn't expect Jay sir to compare Buddha and shankara . Shankara opposed the Buddhism of those times that was after Buddha's period. How can be biased and lopsided against Shankara. Shankara ,though elitist, created poems like bhaja govindam which insists on the grass roots level to trust on the Govinda nama instead of complicated grammar and shastras. Shankara not just opposed Buddhism, but other branches of Hinduism which was against the inclusiveness of hinduism like kapalika , purva mimamsa. He has appealed to all levels of karma , bhakthi and gnana. For you to say that shankara lacked compassion is very wrong. I trust you sir .

[@nirjharmallick]

If you think Shankara is not narrow hearted as compared to Buddha, then you are always wrong.There comes no pure lover like Budhdhha,everyone knows that.Gyan yoga can be basis for someone but Budhdhha says about karmayoga which India still struggle to accept.And according to me Karmayoga is important same as Gyanyoga.If anyone sees the history of West and history of east ,then everyone will see what Krishna and Buddha has advised cannot be followed by Indians and what Jesus says seems absolutely effected India as here most people are born like to count the days for death to come as like Jesus was their God who said them to follow him .And Westerners acts like working and engaging with all possible work everytime they get chance like Krishna and Buddha has said them to do work rightly.So there is a reverse seen in real world.Every type of Yoga can be practised for salvation.Do your own salvation.

[@rakeshjanu7783]

Let me say this both are equally good Adi Shankara and Buddha , If one is air and another is water. Hinduism is alive because of Adi Shankara 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@arghyapratimsaha3183]

He is a genius and a spiritually enlightened being...He feels and understands all spiritual Knowledge just the way I visualise spirituality...So I personally like his videos...Good work sir...Keep it up

[@ansh_u_r]

actually Buddha took me to bhakti..buddha took me to krishna..I have imagined a yogeshwar Krishna sitting in dhyana mudra looking like buddha only difference is the buddha is wearing yellow chiver and wearing a mor pankh on his head...another imagination was the peepal tree where buddha is sitting and doing dhyana there on the other side of the tree Krishna is playing flute..

[@keerthanakumar3491]

Super sis👌👌u really clarified my doubts...

[@conankudo100]

Well Buddha and Krishna are the same

[@anamikaabaddha1159]

Great. What a wonderful explanation. Thank you very much sir.

[@biplobpal4483]

1!(factorial) = 1 & 0! = also 1. I think that can be the solution between Buddha and Sangkararya's philosophy. I don’t know, if l have the deepest knowledge of it. Just saying it can be. Pronam 🙏🙏🙏 my heart core respest to you.

[@kiteretsu3600]

*Woow* 👏👏👏

[@lotustv6271]

If somebody says that Buddha come and talk to him. It may be a illusion

[@tapassarma8562]

Adi shankar is great...

[@pdevika3629]

🌷🙏🌷🙏🌷🙏🌷

[@bryancampbell2484]

Wow, I had the exact same thought between the two. It is this same experience that reconciles both parties in their realization of that ultimate truth.

[@Ashok_Singh1235]

Please increase audio level sir

[@Lord.Dakshinamurthy]

:) 🔱 I miss the bodhi tree.... But I saw a leaf

[@ivanbates6302]

Damn. What a phenomenal video. This guy really is a guru 🙏

[@user-mc1om1wj9d]

increase the audio!

[@manojsoni1089]

hume hindusim aap jaise logo se yaa kisi se bhi sikhne ki jarurat nai hai..humare bhagwan ne geera raamayan jaise granth banye hai hum unse sikhenge.... rahi vivekanad ki baat to us vyakti par baat krne k liye samay nai jo bekar kare

[@samarthachaitanya2500]

But the discussion comparing compassionate aspect of bhuddist and shankara view point is misplaced. Both budha and shankara are equally compassionate and practically demonstrated in their lives. One greatness about Shri Adi Shankara is at the gross root level he taught dwaita to people by way of his devotion to Vishnu by writing Bhasya to Vishnu sahasranam, gave shivaananda lahari, govinda stuthi and also praised the mother nature through great work of Saundarya Lahari. He tried to uplift the level of bhakti from dwaita or murthi aradhana to advanced techniques of poorna or paratatwa as per advaitha. It would be wrong to call him mere by the proponent of advaitha phylosophy. Moreover, he used NETHI NETHI just to say about objective world only keeping in view of ultimate one truth calling para or Brahma, but did not deny existence of truths of objective world. He was compassionate and totally observed in surrender to chandala and blessed poor lady with kanakadhara. Discussions, therefore are no doubt more intellectual but lack some crucial elements of both dwaita, Advaita, and nothingness aspect of Buddha.

[@shriramjadhav7891]

I am born in a Tribal family, and I follow Marathi Vaishnav Sampraday which adheres to Adviata philosophy. I draw inspiration from Image of AdiShankara bowing down to the Chandala. so I don't care if that movement of Adi Shankara was elitist or not. His work and sacrifice influenced the Bhakti movement. And even a tribal hindus like me is yet getting benefited by it. and now I consider it my duty to take this compassionate teachings of Adi Shankara to the lower class. Just bashing out Jay Lakhani Sir Or Swami Vivekananda won't help anyone. Jay Hind.

[@ansh_u_r]

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle..

[@tivo3720]

A monk with kamandalu is it Buddha or adi Shankaracharya?

[@venkatkrishnan3892]

Admire JL ji.... But I disagree largely on this one. The three cannot be compared as they didn't live the same age, were not born in similar backgrounds and most importantly if you compare them compare them for the first 30 yrs of their respective lives. Anything further is an unfair comparison. Adi Shankara lived for 30 years only. Swami Vivekananda lived closer to 40 years and Gautama Buddha lived till 80yrs. So comparing the 3 is incorrect. Buddha left home at the age of 29 after leading a hedonistic life.... . .Adi Shankara left home at the age of 9 to find a master and left this earth at only 30. Swami Vivekananda and The Buddha lived comfortable lives for the age equal to the lifetime of Adi Shankara. Adi Shankara Bhagawadpada is arguably the greatest thinker, philosopher, dharma revivalist to have walked on earth. I bow to Swami Vivekananda & the Buddha who are my gurus too.... But comparing these 3 giants is not correct as it can never be accurate . 🙏🙏. I'd love to see a video of JL ji describing the life of Adi Shankara who was born a Shroutha Namboothiri, Memorised the prasthana thrayi by age 7, Became an Advaita scholar by 14, wrote bhashyas by 20, learnt Shaktha in kasmir by 22, defeated every possible scholar in his time, revived innumerable temples, broke barriers of orthodoxy, created the Dashanami Akhadas to fight for Dharma.... JL ji ... the world needs to know the life of Adi Shankara in your words. 🙏

[@Gopinathk17]

Adi Sankara is a man of highest level of intellect and compassion.

[@sl-bodhi]

There is only one truth or one reality; hence, it is meaningless to draw differences between the two religions. One may view the house from top view and another view from front view, but both views are views of the same house. It is meaningless to compare which is more intellectual and which is more compassionate. Both realized the same truth - formless and omniscient so no point to identify signs.

[@ssamarr5970]

Adi Shankaracharya was a strongest personality a sharp intellect and Buddha was a maditative man like Adi Yogi. Both are incomparable.

[@rajeswariyaddanapudi1471]

Noclear voice how to listen please make it clear

[@arindamghatak]

The actual answer to the question asked begins at 5:07. Before that, all flowery nonsense. You are welcome!

[@kishorej9919]

All BRAHMAGNANIS are the same. They only preach according to the ongoing situation and requirements of their times. If anyone has BLEMISH, then he could not become a BRAHMAGNANI. SHRI ADI SANKARA and LORD BUDDHA are the like THE SAME PERSON IN DIFFERENT CLOTHING. They taught according to their times. 🙏🙏🙏

[@manojsoni1089]

sir kisi ke upar vichar rakhna bhut jaruri hai..par khud ko hi sahi manna sahi nai...aap humare pass aaye hm aap ko bushisam ki kayi kami bata denge...khali baate nai ..praman ke sath baat karenge.... kuch bhi bolo par apni baat ko saboot ke sath rakho...

[@arindamghatak]

Although largely considered to be a Nastika Philosophy, Buddha himself was not a Nastika neither did he intend for his philosophy teachings to be Nastika. He followed the exact teachings of the Vedas / Upanishads and his teachings match those of Advaita Vedanta very closely, including the presence of a Primordial Self. So, the Atman - Anatman / Anatta debate is just pointless. It is just a difference in semantics of what is considered an Atman and what is considered an Anatman. Source: The Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra, Translated into English by Kosho Yamamoto, 1973 from Dharmakshema’s Chinese version. (Taisho Tripitaka Vol. 12, No. 374). Available online in pdf format. In Mahaparinirvana Sutra (Chapter 3: About Grief), Buddha says (moments before he passed away): "Even though he has said that all phenomena [dharmas] are devoid of the Self, it is not that they are completely/ truly devoid of the Self. What is this Self? Any phenomenon [dharma] that is: 1. true [satya], 2. real [tattva], 3. eternal [nitya], 4. sovereign/ autonomous/ self-governing [aisvarya], and 5. whose ground/ foundation is unchanging [asraya-aviparinama], is termed ’the Self’ [atman]. This is as in the case of the great Doctor who well understands the milk medicine. The same is the case with the Tathagata. For the sake of beings, he says "there is the Self in all things" O you the four classes! Learn Dharma thus!" These are the characteristics of the Atman (Buddhadhātu) that he describes. Chapter Twelve: On the Nature of the Tathagata. Further, he uses a parable to describe thus: Consider the story of a mother whose infant son is ill. The physician gives her a medicine for her child with the instruction that she shouldn’t breastfeed him till he has fully digested the medicine. So, the mother applies some bitter substance on her breasts and tells her son that the milk is poisonous. So, the child pulls away from her breasts even when he is hungry. But after the medicine has been ingested, the mother washes her breasts and beckons her son for her milk. So, the Vedas are the mother’s milk that the Buddha did not allow his disciples to partake until they had purified themselves with the austere message of emptiness or Shunyata (Shunya means zero in Sanskrit and other Indian languages). So, this was the method of Buddha’s teaching. So, truly speaking, Buddhism can be considered to be a sect or a school within Hinduism itself. And truly speaking, Buddhism belongs to the Astika schools within Hinduism.

[@tivo3720]

The adi Shankaracharya who vowed down to a chandal accepted him as guru. You are questioning his bhakti??? Have you ever read the bhakti songs composed by adi Shankaracharya ❤

[@Bigetron506]

Adi Sankara charya was incarnation of lord shiva Debate over. And Buddha was nothing but lacks of belief in god.

[@umesh8927]

​@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 buddha had schizophrenia his mind and brain is thing that never existed same with his devotees

[@Bigetron506]

@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 where do Sankaracharya says this give me proof..?? 🤣🤣🤣

[@Bigetron506]

@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 there is no Buddhism existed just lack of belief in God.. lol 😂😂😆😆😆

[@Bigetron506]

@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 cause he came after Buddhist people started converting hindu people into buddhisy.

[@aman6980]

​@Vitamin Protein🇷🇺 mayavadam asac chastram pracchannam bauddham uchyate mayaiva kalpitam devi kalau brahmana rupina (Padma Purana 6.236.7) Translation: "Mayavada or Advaita philosophy is an impious, wicked belief and against all the conclusions of the Vedas. It is only covered Buddhism. My dear Parvati, in Kali-Yoga I assume the form of a brahmana (Adi Shankara) and teach this imagined philosophy तदेव साधयेन्नृणां देवतानां च दैवतम्। करिष्यत्यवताराणि शंकरो नीललोहितः॥३३॥ श्रीतस्मार्तप्रतिष्ठार्थ भक्तानां हितकाम्यया। उपदेक्ष्यंति तज्ज्ञानं शिष्याणां ब्रह्मसंज्ञितम्॥ ३४॥ सर्ववेदान्तसारं हि धर्मान्वेदनिदर्शितान्। सर्ववर्णान् समुद्दिश्य स्वधर्मा ये निदर्शिताः।।३५।। Translation: The people should adore Lord Mahadeva, who happens to be the god of gods. The brown complexioned Shiva, for the establishment of Srauta (Vedic) and Smarta dharmas (belonging to the Smritis), and for the welfare of the devotees shall incarnate on earth. He will enlighten his devotees on the subjects of the gist of Vedantas, the knowledge relating to the Brahman, and all the dharmas enshrined in the Vedas, which have been narrated earlier.

[@ssamarr5970]

Sir aak hi Dharm hai Sanatan, Buddha ke followers usko Buddhism bolte hai, Krishna Adisankar Ram ko mane bale hindu aur Mahaveer ko mane bale Jainism but ye saab aak hai Sanatan hai. Usko hi budha ne bole thee aak hi dhamo Sanatan.🙏

[@robertomarquez9493]

Poor audio quality

[@skguntur]

Adi Sankara and Swamy Vivekananda did not have or at least expressions in actions or facial or bodily expressions in their gift to humanity., please watch them even though we can’t digest/ watch the ones in this age who want to speak Religion and Bhagawan and explain Sankara and Vivekananda to make their own expressive incomplete evaluation of Sankara and Vivekananda with their physical expressions…..

[@213_soumyajitdatta6]

Adi Shankaracharya is not crypto Buddhist But Buddha is a crypto Vedantist

[@khr957]

Moron

[@AlokKumar-pl9ly]

Wonderful and vice versa can also be true. Adwaita Siddhant also sometimes look like nihilist on concept. 😊

[@DattaMusics]

Buddha is a Buddha, all is good with hindutv and all but when you put your name into Lord Buddha from there I start to me alienate myself from the whole movement!!.... Buddha was not just the Gyan yog he is as much of a jnana Yogi as much he was dhyan Yogi, Buddha is Buddha through meditation you can reach to that place shankara would say Jnana is the best way, Buddha combines patanjali and vedanta without being crypto even for a moment if you think all these this did not achieve enlightenment then what can I say may you never touch your conscience!!!

[@prachishardul5380]

Get your concepts clear. Vedhas treated woman and lower castes were not considered in matter of acceptance and Buddhism and Jainism changed the barriers of such Vedic ideas and so they are well known religious. Adi Shankaracharya destroyed the Buddhism from the country during the Gupta Period. Buddhism slowly devasted after the last Mauryan King was assassinated. So Buddha was a old and very neutral concept open for everyone which attracted not only the whole nation but other countries and foreigners. It is not about any Religion. It is about a good religion being stretched for personal liabilities. Early Vedic Period, did not have a caste system. There were no outsiders during Harappan Period. So it is all about creating unnecessary difference among people of the same race.

[@middlewayers]

Many saints of 11 century called him Prachhna

[@shashikumar3487]

Are pagal maurah thoda sa jor se bolne me darr lagta hai ki

[@avm1662]

Buddhas science can't be compare with dogmatic vedanta... Hindu and shankara charya het buddha because he denied existance of permanant self(atma_soul_purus_brahm)... He apposed vedic sacrifice of Animals in yagna, open his knowledge to all varna, all gender, all cast. No discrimination only compation.. When you bring in buddha in dogma his dhamma burns down all dogma and convert it to science. Which is Re-produce and can be experience by any mankind. Where as vedanta only talk about brahma atma but no sympathy_love toward suffering mankind, no solution to suffering...

[@subhrodiprakshit8923]

Stop nonsens barking dude... Shut up... Have you studied vedanta and the stupid buddist notions? Nothing.. But crying... And first of all buddh didn't open the door of his talk to every gender or every varna... He followed the varna system and don't allowed women equally with men. As per spiritual guidanc

[@subhrodiprakshit8923]

Buddha also showed discrimination.. As it was practical and reality...

[@blackmoon655]

​@@subhrodiprakshit8923 😂😂fast read buddhism book

[@dineshlamarumba4557]

brahmana means pure conciousness. sunyata means lack of conciousness. thats all the difference. brahmana is the reason reality exists, multiple universe exists. sunyata means lack of pure conciousness. sunyata is one step deeper into truth. brahmana is someting which is resonsible for creating reality, it is the God all religion describes. quantum feild in scitific term is brahmana pure conciousness. where brahman can create reality-mltiple reality. it is when person has some level of desire, curisity, ignorance that brahmana is created. without desire as buddha said, even brahmana, pure conciousness don't comes into existence. also told by shiva to saptarishi when one asked who created reality what is reality. shiva has told reality/universe is dream, illusion. until spritual person don't abadons brahmana, pure conciousness, god, the creator of reality, he cant escape from samsara-reality-dream-illusn. so buddhism vanishd from india at that time cas at taht time more realized buddhist guru was not present in india. the true buddhist and hindu sages are only prestn in nepal. not in india, aryans do'nt have that level to understand all this. buddhism is pholspy which matches with modern scice more than advanta etc, including shiva's teacings. now one can say so if i'm un-concious or dead etc, isn't brahmana dead as i'm totally unconcious? no. u'r just unaware just like animals, the brahmana still exists for u. Note: noting is real. with every intent universe/reality is shifiting for u. consider brahaman as reason reality exists. emptyness as ceasion of brahmana though ceasaion of desire totally i.e presence of no sub-nocious vibrations also. shiva's teaching is buddhas teaching also. brahmins were outward focues homo sapins before comming in indian subcontinet so theri natural insintct of curisoty didn't understood sunyata.

[@kunalkumarchaurasiya3239]

Rigidness sucks

[@HsPrahlada]

factually wrong assessment of Adi Sankara. who wrote Bhaja Govindam and for what ? it amplifies the fact that downtrodden and tribals and other outcastes were taken into fold of Hinduism by Him and Buddhism taught us Ahimsa only which is costing dearly to the Hindus whereas Buddhista are cruel and blood-thirsty lot today.

[@tenzinkhandro]

Adi Shankar manage to destroy Buddhism in the land of its origin by a very cunning way and that is by teaching and writing that the Gautam Buddha is the 9th incarnation of Vishnu. However Disappearance of Buddhism in India is followed by its appearances in neighbouring countries and then throughout the world. Credit goes to Adi Shankar. It is good to do through research on how Adi Shankar did that and how he borrowed Buddhist philosophy of Non dualism into Hinduism.

[@parmar__12]

Non dualism was even before budhism Or budha himself upanishad are it's witness And what shankar did was only did commentary on them he didn't synthesize anything new

[@aninda2457]

Non dualism existed in the Upanishads, Adi Shankaracharya only highlighted them for us. If you read Gaurapada ( his teacher’s teacher) then he was more candid or radical in explaining Vedanta.

[@TharsyanJaderuby]

Adi Shankara Acharya himself refuted Siddhartha Gautama as Avatar of Vishnu. Also he didn't "destroy" Buddhism in India, he debated Buddhists and even other schools of indian philosophies and won them.

[@karmatravelogue]

Adi Shankar Archarya doesn’t deserve the credit at all for the spread of Buddhism outside India. His intention was to eliminate Buddhism from it birthplace, not to spreading it to outside world. Credit goes to those Buddhist scholars who left India to avoid getting crushed or killed.

[@sourabdebnath3280]

Wrong, Islamic invasion put a last nail on it.

[@DVMANGLA]

The entire universe is manifested Brahman. It is the physical body of Brahman. It is manifested Brahman. Brahman doesn't mean God. God is a very narrow meaning as per Bible. Each and every atom including all living beings are nothing but Absolute Brahman. There is nothing other than Brahman. Even the universe around us which looks so real is a Myth/ False like our dreams are not real. “What is Brahman” and “What is our Ego I” or “Who am I” are the ultimate aim of our human life. All the Gurus must concentrate on this, if they are really Gurus or yogis or Swami. Show less REPLY

[@skmutsuddi]

Swami Vivekanand had no exposure to 'Theravada' at all but the spoiler sects like Mahayana and Vajrayana. ..... So, his perception of Buddhism was totally corrupt. In that way, how could he link it to his preferred philosophy of Vedanta??

[@djewynne9638]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha, the answer is inherent in the question; Brahman IS the Nothing, the Nothing IS Brahman. Ha ha ha ha ha ha, like the nose on One's face, in front of you the whole time. All the best to you!

[@yasithapriyamal9374]

Although adi shankara was successful,his disciple were not and are not able to debate with islam.and islam is existing now india.what kind of the guru adi shankara is😂😂😂

[@nayushadmyiloor9347]

We have nothing philosophic in islam.. Only for cave man..

[@sumitdutta7043]

Islam believes in sword not debates.

[@prathameshgaonkar7234]

Atheism doesn't make sense

[@saikumarroyyala7985]

😊 please study the Indian history thoroughly. King Ashoka along with many kings promoted Buddhism in other countries too in the world. But, Mughals and many kings who occupied India, spoiled Buddhist monasteries, killed monks, they have a crucial role in reducing Buddhism in India. My dear all, even Indian flag, saffron is from Buddhism, 3 lions are from Buddhism. Many...,,, I was also a Hindu previously, but not now anymore. I did spiritual research, just on a glance. Hinduism, Jainism, Ramayan and Mahabharat, Quran, Muslimism, Christianity etc..,,, many,,,,Buddhism 😊 is ultimate. If anyone has read upto here. Just try yourselves once, have a glance at all religions like me, I loved and love Buddhism 😊 always. And, still if you can't understand Buddhism, I hope you walk towards liberation 😮. Last thing, I'm afraid, it may hurt you. But it's real. People don't like real things, that's why, you don't like Buddhism. Fools can't understand Buddhism 😊 Only intelligents can understand 😊Buddhism, these people, walk in the path of Nirvana. Hinduism and religions almost, just created for business, caste😢 etc..,, BBC made a documentary on Christianity, Jesus was also a Buddhist monk. I hope me too, become a Buddhist monk soon 🔜😊 ultimate way of life. Watch this video once..,,, kzbin.info/www/bejne/ombVn2iQgZ6YjbM

[@satyaraavinuthala8702]

Absolutely rubbish moha mudgara and other works are shher compassion towards humanity

[@satyaraavinuthala8702]

Adi Shankara works ranged from small laymen level to high estoric all are sheer embodiment of compassion.bhaja govindam moodhamate

[@pemayogi6117]

BUDDHISM EXPLAINS NIHILISTIC NOT AS ZERO OR NOTHINGNESS. BUDDHIST NILL OR NOTHINGNESS MEANING NOT ZERO.. BUDDHIST EXPLAINS NOTHING MEANS "NOT A THING" IT IS BEYOND, IT IS INEXPRESSIBLE, IMMEASURABLE.. IT IS IT. YOU FAILED TO BUDDHIST VIEW. DO SEARCH MORE.

[@Space_Walker415]

Adi Shankaracharya is above human understanding...the way you glorifying budda, who told ahimsa , nonviolence, the same budda ate meat..

[@The_mytuber]

u mean the meat that was given to him as a gift.

[@prachishardul5380]

Do you know what Ahimsa was during the Vedic Period and during Buddha's time. No, because you lack knowledge. Animal sacrifice for Upper Caste was a part of religious rituals and Animal Consumption for Lower Caste was a way to survive because unavailability of basic resources. From every way, there was Ahimsa. It was quite normal those days to consume meat by everyone. Lower caste people could stay on the most stain and dead meat but the others consumed fresh meat. Buddha knew Animal or even Human Violence was wrong and so he said no to Ahimsa. He said to consume meat only when you have nothing to eat to survive. Buddhism is basically a practical religion.

[@Space_Walker415]

@@prachishardul5380 i may be lack with knowledge...but im not stupid like you.. the person who said to follow ahimsa, first he should know how the meat food comes.. u know how? Its means u need to kill animal.. lol..basic principles broken by themself...nonsense , stupid your are...and your religion... Says somethings but does another things...lol...

[@subhrodiprakshit8923]

@@The_mytuber so if anybody give you stolen jewellery and you know that... Then is notit a crime also?

[@NoFear.Mr.T]

Buddha is crypto Hindu.Hinduism and vedas are older than Buddhism.

[@aneeshms5192]

Yes budha was a atheist. Shankaracharya destroy bhudha. Iam in kerala sankara' s birth place

[@bullymaguire4927]

@@aneeshms5192 I also respect Shankaracharya but he does not defeat Buddha he defeated Buddhist monks in shastrath so do not involved Buddha in this Buddha never spread hatered he only criticise the things which wrong in Veda puranas etc thank you

[@costan4097]

@@darkodonnie2729 How shankacharya defeated buddhist monks.Can you tell me that story ??

[@vijaynath7561]

@@costan4097 actually Buddhist don't believe in soul ( atma) and many things and try to defame and defeat hindu vedic but at that time shankaracharya arrived and proved atma (soul) and brahman can't be seperable with his advanta vedata and defeated every Buddhist and jain monks big story is there.

[@user-bd7pk9fr5q]

Yeah he was a crypto Vedantin

[@kunalkumarchaurasiya3239]

Shankar always tried to please god through Shastra. God loves devotees,not the way he worships

[@aman6980]

Shankaracharya never pleased anyone he was the incarnation of lord Shiva he just camed on earth to establish sanatan Dharma again through ved and advait philosophy

[@middlewayers]

Sanakar was a decent sage but Don't put his name with Buddha..have some basic respect

[@aman6980]

He was not a decent sage he was the incarnation of lord Shiva

[@pubgtdmking3385]

World know about buddha not adishankar Pls don’t compare

[@shivamtiwari5484]

What world knows about Alexander but not about cholas does it makes Alexander better than them

[@S1n6341]

Both of JAGATGURU SHAKRACHARYA and LORD BHUDDA , reach the same stage of PRAGYA , where ADI SHAKRACHARYA had defined it ABSOLUTENESS, and BUDDHA defied it as SHUNYA , so mathematically it means, infinity and nothingness, but now the question is both of them reach at the same point but where defining differently , but it was only difference between the mental stage of BODHIDAMA and SHAKRACHARYA, SHAKRACHARYA JI was enlightened and BODHIDAMA was not .

[@Ashok_Singh1235]

Please increase audio level sir