Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 W B Binoculars Review | Optics Trade Reviews

[@clintdavies491]

just ordered a pair of orange 10x32. thank you your review was gratefully received.

[@OpticsTradeEU]

We're happy to hear that! We hope they serve you well!

[@tehrihumbert876]

Buddy, it would be really interesting if you gave a few lines here in feedback, describing your pleasure, talking a little about what you feel.... the image is rather stable with this large field of vision, no worries about camera shake, etc etc.... Thx !

[@codywy5579]

Got the 8x32 NL.. absolutely love it. The Orange looks much better in real life. Also got the head rest and harness strap. Highly recommend them both

[@steve-wu7jp]

I enjoy your reviews and have purchased binoculars from your website. I would love to see you guys try some reviews in the field or outside demonstrating some of the capabilities instead of just doing inside a studio. Even if you included 2 minutes of the review outside in the field the review would be more interesting and beneficial.

[@tehrihumbert876]

OOhh yes, exactly !!!! great review at each time, but always the regret of not having felt in the middle of nature ! This would be really great for your viewers !!

[@theclearrag]

I have to say that they've done many excellent outside reviews of thermal imagers. These guys have a lot of technical knowledge & they discuss all aspects of the products as a team, all adding their own individual thoughts & ideas. Their indepth reviews are arguably the best you'll find on KZbin!!

[@Ks-zz9lh]

These are the best. I already had a pair of el 10x42s. Which are good. But I love these so much more. I compared the 8 x 32s with the 8 x 42s and I still like the 32s quite a little bit better. The lighter weight keeps them a little more stable. And there is something very satisfying about the compact package. I love bringing binos on casual hikes and I often find my el 42s just a bit too cumbersome. I also like to do a little tree spotting either in the forest or at the edge and I get annoyed with the el 10 x 42s. These not so much. Then I checked them in the dust and they are exactly as bright as my 10x 42 el one. Maybe a hair brighter but I think I’m imagining that. Fair to say equally bright. So that’s pretty good.

[@GapBahnDirk]

An excellent review of these impressive Swarovski 8x32 roof prisms. It occurs to me that the discontinued porro prism design, Steiner Nighthunter 8x30 binoculars had a 95+% light transmission. They were also lighter at about 540gms and of course cheaper. My point is that I hope we will again see modern porro prism designs in the future.

[@robtudor3785]

Just purchased these. Amazing.

[@claudej8805]

4 mm exit pupil is good. Those binos will do nicely at dusk. Also keep in mind that older people might not even be able to open their pupils more than 4mm (Ed Harris anybody ?). Which would annihilate the advantage of having wider exit pupils. 8*32 is ok but 10*32 is not ok. I'd probably go 10*42 with headrest if I did go NL Pure (but not 12*42).

[@miertjestoer9525]

I think the 10x 32 is better. More magnification yet decent wide field . Thanks.

[@theclearrag]

Thanks for another😂 thoroughly brilliant review, covering everything we would wish to know. My question to you is though, are you planning to do a similar review for the 10X32 version?

[@OpticsTradeEU]

Maybe in the future, stay tuned :) If you're interested we recently made a review of the EL Range TA 10x32: kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWmykIShd6lsr5o Thanks for watching!

[@nickhorton785]

Hope Swarovski introduce a 7x35 pure😊

[@FrowningAllTheTime]

For me the main sour point is that the maximum IPD is 72 mm. (I need 74)

[@theclearrag]

One question regarding the strap. Why don't Swarovski include the orange binocular strap with this particular model??

[@s.d.r1062]

Do i need an 10x32 NL Pure? I already have a 8x42 NL Pure and a Zeiss Victory Pocket 8x25. I want some more mag. Or is it barely noticeable?😊

[@geeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzz]

Swaros do annoy me in that I don't have so much disposable income which is entirely my own fault of course but thankfully you can still get something very good for very much less cash outlay. I still think it great for companies like Swaro to push technology boundaries & produce such incredible products even if they are orange, which may be good if you lose them in a bush or something. I still think I'd go for boring old green but it's one problem I don't think I'm goring to have to worry about. I guess I will survive but I do like good optics so it is missing out some. I shouldn't look at these things really.

[@Steve-o1u8y]

The Zeiss SFL are a very good substitute and a lot cheaper.

[@Abc-nb9yt]

turning the focus like this do not meam any think abaout focus speed

[@teachingrounds]

How does this compare to the leica ultravid 8/32?

[@OpticsTradeEU]

Hello! You can write us an email at [e-mail] and we'll give you our objective opinion.

[@hamidrezaebadi4334]

Hello , Dear sir , How much is it ??? ( NL PURE 8×32 ) , Thanks 🤔

[@OpticsTradeEU]

For the price check out our website: www.optics-trade.eu/si/swarovski-nl-pure-8x32-w-b.html. We also ship worldwide. If you have any additional questions please don't hesitate to contact us. Optics Trade Team

[@s.d.r1062]

You can check anywere on the internet

[@sadikant6975]

👍👏👏👏💚

[@markjg2275]

I do not like those Frankenstein lumps for the neck strap , I like the Leica Ultravid 10x32 better and more compact I would rather buy the Swarovski CL pocket 10x25 than this binocular because it does not have those bulges which in my opinion are an ugly looking addition to these binoculars with no improvement on carry and use but an obstacle in handling.

[@threedot141]

I have owned the CL pocket 10x 25 for about 6 years now and use them every day. I think they are great binoculars. Of course, it would be nice to have a wider field of view of NLs, but I also really like the true compact size of the CLs.

[@javwildman]

Thank for a great review covering all I needed to know, just need to save up for them now.