SWAROVSKI OPTIK - BTX Tour 2017

[@nickc2124]

Incredible engineering. Reminds me of a high tech piece of kit my optometrist uses to check me for glaucoma and to map my my corneas... LOL. I want one of these so bad. Suddenly my ATS85 seems insignificant.

[@ShakespeareCafe]

Forget the scope...how about that awesome sweater 6:12

[@jmanuel4747]

MANU ROAD tHE BEST FOR BIRDING...

[@ShakespeareCafe]

Birding, yes. Death sports, nein

[@jasonhiggins6431]

But remember they cost £2000 on top of your £3000 scope and they weigh a ton and you loose your zoom capability, there fixed magnification , the combined weight of the ATX95, BTX eyepiece the gimbal head giant tripod and swaro baseplate needs two people to carry , iv got one !!!

[@andreabertoncello2164]

I have one BTX too and BTX is well above ATX module in terms of sharpness and contrast. Well, the price of BTX Is very high, but there is nothing like it in the market at the moment. Instead, there are a lot of products like ATX, including ATS scope or Meopta S2 82 HD, which are equal in terms of quality of the image at a fraction of the price.

[@Bikerbeest]

@@andreabertoncello2164 I have the ATX 115 mm and the Swarovski NL Pure 14 x 52 mm When I compare my 14 x 52 mm and 30 x magnification with my ATX 115 I see no difference in clarity , contrast and sharpness between them Exit pupil in both cases are almost the same , 3.83 mm for the ATX 115 mm and 3.71 for the NL Pure 14 x 52 mm I see only some small differences when I increase the magnification in the ATX 115