X-Plane 12 - The Best NEW Flight Simulator?

[@sadraadib306]

X-Plane 12 feels a little rushed. It just looks like a graphic overhaul. As of right now X-Plane 12 needs a lot of addons to look good. I hope In the future with addons X-Plane 12 can start to compare to the beauty of MSFS.

[@caribbaviator7058]

Wish we had a combo of both. I will use both anyway . I like the flight model better in XP12 especially the adverse yaw movement that is more closer to reality.

[@jounaas]

when will people realise its and early acces/ beta not full release

[@mediumlightlads8815]

@@jounaas ong lmao

[@skabyy]

it’s an early access game, more updates will come out later

[@rodrigocuevas1987]

also with a 2gb vram or 4gb vram graphics card the fps performance is horrible

[@2BachShakur]

Even if we pull MSFS out of the equation and judge X-Plane 12 on its own merits, I’m struggling to see the justification behind the $60 price when it cursorily looks identical to X-Plane 11.

[@tonywoutrs]

If it wasn't for MSFS you'd see more difference. Imho But I would say I'm gonna wait a bit before purchasing.

[@alieffauzanrizky7202]

It's still on early access...

[@WarrenPostma]

The XPlane 11 trees were crap. It only looks the same when you ignore the whole planet.

[@alunesh12345]

@@tonywoutrs Believe in JESUS today, confess and repent of your sins. No one goes to heaven for doing good but by believing in JESUS who died for our sins. For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.(John 3:16)🥳❤️😁

[@thomasrossbabin3671]

@@alieffauzanrizky7202 🤓🤓🤓

[@joaoperpetua8285]

The UI still feels old. The thing that bothers me the most and one of the things I love the most in MSFS is the world map where you can see all the airports and calculate from there your route depending on the time you want to spend flying. Aside from the lighting which is marginally better, the graphics overall don't seem like a big upgrade from xp11

[@alexaghajanovaviation3365]

they said they like the simple ui and its a bit of a "if it aint broke dont fix it" type of situation, also regarding graphics in general they said its not a top priority but will improve the ground scenery throughout xplane 12's lifetime.

[@topgun1457]

@@alexaghajanovaviation3365 yeah on xplane 20 lmao

[@jacksonsoto5308]

@@alexaghajanovaviation3365 Graphics should be top priority competing with some of the best graphics on any game ever in MSFS

[@gabagool8]

@@jacksonsoto5308 Why? Graphics don't matter much when you're in the air, which is what I usually do in my flight simulators. As long as the plane looks good and the scenery looks acceptable, I'm happy.

[@oreogyt4817]

@@jacksonsoto5308 they’re not competing with Microsoft flight simulator, they have better aircraft physics and models, which is way more important than graphics in a flight simulator

[@AmilcarP]

The big problem here is that MSFS was released and it set the standard too high. Like blackberry and iphone. It is hard to compare anymore. I understand people say physics in xplane is better but at the end of the day both of them will never hit the spot. When i was getting my private rating. I was doing perfect landing on the simulator. When it was my turn to flight in real life damn those feet were hurting from so much rudders to keep the damn c172 on centerline. It was a different monster. I do not see much different at the end to the point to give up msfs scenary. Autogen is ok but they need to improve the graphics the same way they did the trees.

[@uraymeiviar]

trees does not even look good

[@gaenthusiast9427]

True.XP would have been Blackberry and MSFS would have been IPhone. It was always and uphill battle for Blackberry when the IPhone was released, Blackberry has to contend with new and more advanced technology in the IPhone.

[@uraymeiviar]

@@gaenthusiast9427 and P3D is nokia?

[@gaenthusiast9427]

@@uraymeiviar Ahh, I guess P3D would be Nokia 🤣. I never really thought about it 🤣.

[@hodb3906]

It’s still in beta ffs. It’s just always the same. When msfs was in beta, p3d and xplane users couldn’t wait to dogpile. Now that xplane 12 is in beta, msfs users can wait to dogpile either.

[@mrenergykills]

I wish msfs and xplane could combine everything together and give us an amazing flight sim 😅

[@hallyzhou]

Micro$off could totally just purchase Laminar but that’s gonna trigger another investigation I bet

[@aidenaviation]

That would be brilliant

[@sgxttt]

This is why fans could never be devs

[@mrenergykills]

@@sgxttt By taking the physics of xplane and graphics of msfs? 🤣🤣

[@mrenergykills]

@lion air MD-90-30 🤣🤣

[@maxw2974]

If you look closely, the Plane „floats“ a bit over the runway! Clouds are still bad compared to MSFS

[@colasmulot]

I agree clouds still look terrible and bland, even DCS World has much better clouds.

[@alexaghajanovaviation3365]

@@benos4x4adventures49 well yes, its the same simulator from 1995 continuously being updated. some aspects are essentially the same as xp11.

[@benos4x4adventures49]

@@alexaghajanovaviation3365 basically its Xplane11.5 😆

[@alexaghajanovaviation3365]

@@benos4x4adventures49 maybe more 11.8, it is inquestionable that massive improvements have been made, but everyone can tell its essentially the same sim upgraded. plus 11.55 is a thing :D

[@kensoran0013]

I guess that’s why I’m ya early access

[@FrancescoSpace]

I bet the whole community was waiting for this video. LET’S GOOO!

[@Kilosim]

Yes agreed

[@ziepex7009]

was waiting for a good xp12 but oh well lol

[@FrancescoSpace]

@@ziepex7009 it’s actually really good, just wait for proper terrain addons, tbh that’s the only major downside

[@degamewinner2727]

@@ziepex7009 its early access. still time to improve

[@JYang365]

@Ziepex also the blurriness is a early acces bug

[@omarliew1164]

i've only used msfs since 98 and never understood why lot's of people where so convinced about x-plane being superior. Tried the Demo today and still don't get it. Low res textures, bad aliasing, bad texture filtering. I don't even care about there's no satelite images. It would still look terrible. The flight model might be 'superior' to msfs according to Austin, but after flying around a bit in the default c172 i think it's just complete nonsense. Both sims have their shortcommings, But it looks like x-plane has the most of them. For me atleast. Still both don't come close to flying irl though.

[@isaacwatkins-rye4379]

I agree

[@topgun1457]

@@sesgow msfs and xplane 12 have the same c172

[@bossmarcus3449]

one word, physics

[@omarliew1164]

@@sesgow that is true, the default airliners aren't any good in msfs. But this doesn't mean the entire capabilities of the sim are bad. As pmdg has shown with the 737.

[@mercster]

The flight model feels better. I agree that MSFS graphics are important, but it seems that's most of what you care about. Other people have different priorities. It's nothing to be "baffled" by or call "nonsense"... everyone can have their own likes and dislikes, this isn't comparing friggin' arcade fighting games. Calm down.

[@operatorblackbird]

Already bought it, quite happy with it, I wished the F-14D was more detailed though, and I hope someone makes a mod for the A330 with the same quality as the Zibo 737.

[@YN-io6kj]

A qhole dev community/team is already on it lol. Look up XP12 A33x development and doscord.

[@hpharold23]

Lol A330 has 737 FMC there you.. ahahaha

[@nwpilot07]

@@hpharold23 come on, it really doesn’t take much research to see that the 737 fmc is there as a placeholder during the beta while they continue to develop the full fmgs system, do better.

[@alunesh12345]

@@YN-io6kj Believe in JESUS today, confess and repent of your sins. No one goes to heaven for doing good but by believing in JESUS who died for our sins. For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.(John 3:16)🥳❤️😁

[@dariush.2375]

Compared to MSFS, this just looks horrifying

[@benos4x4adventures49]

i agree 100%

[@rrocketman]

lol u said it

[@bankruptcy7477]

Compared To The Problems With MSFS 1) Not Available In Mac 2) Physics Engine 3) More Computer Specs Required Even Though I can Play on x box cloud it will require a controller and I can't use honeycomb yoke

[@emel69]

It's on early access for a reason :/

[@Maboywassup]

yeah yeah, always some guy saying MFSF Bettar

[@gaenthusiast9427]

The clouds in XP 12 are pretty poor, it needs a lot more work by LR. Overall, XP 12 is more like XP 11.5.

[@aviatorschannel]

1:32 if I’m not mistaking that’s not Seattle Airport, but Portland Airport KPDX

[@no_name2882]

I still feel as if the add-on planes for Msfs make it a better flight sim. The scenery seems more real in MSFS2020.

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

Even the addon planes don't realistically represent how the plane really flies though. Msfs graphics are good, but the whole "flight simulator" aspect is sluggish.

[@no_name2882]

@@Godzilaer simcade?

[@no_name2882]

@@mikeyplayzwrld some planes do a relatively good job at representing their real life counterparts

[@fsx-legend4602]

@@Godzilaer These comments are so played out, ever tried the WTG1000nxi in MSFS?

[@elnathanlello7331]

@@Godzilaer MSFS IS A FLIGHT SIMULATOR

[@skabyy]

x-plane 12 and msfs2020 comparison would be pretty cool, to see the differences

[@SoupGuyy]

Well if only msfs had Xplane physics msfs would be the best sim of the era

[@SarcaSebi]

I really think x plane is much better imo

[@fortel7939]

I think that msfs is for people who want to have beautiful graphics and x plane for people that want to focus more on the plane himself

[@kyantoerse]

@@fortel7939 the planes in msfs look better but in xplane the planes fly better

[@JWC924]

@@SoupGuyy keep beating the dead horse on the physics discussion. As a CA for United Airlines with a type rating for A319/320 737 757/767. Xplane physics are nothing special.. Xplane 12 finally caught up to MSFS 2004

[@Rosheikh.]

I think in my opinion that MSFS is still the winner out of the flight sims, But i do like the new graphic improvement.

[@benos4x4adventures49]

i agree

[@lunchbreaker4623]

It is, easily.

[@akulchadha2069]

True

[@flyin_with_ryan]

Hmm. This seems rushed. If you didn’t tell me this was XP12, I would have a hard time figuring it out. Only the the trees, clouds, and water changed. It just seems like modded XP11. Looks nice though, but for some reason I think I like XP11 more than this, I don’t know why. Maybe because I had higher expectations. I’m gonna stick with MSFS just because of how quick the updates are.

[@nomadicplays]

If Laminar And Microsoft Worked together to make a flight sim, It would be a masterpiece!

[@prezent1979]

11:02 “oh we don’t even have it animated” Said mr Swiss about a static modelled mash… But seriously great video man!

[@vicatoren3967]

My man really starts his games from the folder

[@tigerking9054]

To end the war, Xplane has the physics, and Microsoft has the realism

[@RaspySquares]

The afterburner of the F14 changing color at higher altitudes is cool.

[@RCHeliJet]

With the Citation in Samedan Airport Love it :)

[@Liachu_]

That graphic change between Xplane11 and Xplane12 is so crazy 🤯 it looks like they have a 10 years release difference

[@PuuroLehma]

Thats true. (Your channel is cool liachu)

[@Boeing-Aeronautica]

Liachu and his flight sim crew

[@Liachu_]

@@PuuroLehma thanks 🔥

[@Spiritwonder420]

lol if you look at microsoft flight sim xplane still looks shit

[@Infiniteplanezyt]

5:17 the MHHHMMMM always gets me xD

[@palwaukeeflyer]

Even 2007 Call of Duty 4 looks better than 2022 Xplane 12.

[@sebastian0018]

X Plane11 to X-Plane 12: I have to warn you from swiss001, he crashed my planes.

[@moritzherr]

How come that everyone just acts like this is such an awesome sim? I don't want to offend anybody by any means but I just find it sad to see them release a Sim with such a poor graphics quality and general lack of features in 2022 and call it a competitor to MSFS... Sure MSFS physics aren't quite there yet but with Flight physics improving further and further + all of the awesome study level planes + The level of detail all around the globe because of cloud streaming + Volumetric clouds that can only be semi matched by DCS, you sadly just can't call X-Plane a good competitor in the year 2022. I mean just forget it. And all of the praising aside about how much the graphics of XP12 improved over XP11: Yeah sure it did improve but that is not changing the fact that it still looks like a bad game from 2010 xD How come that everyone just unsees this, I mean you can't be serious to release something of this quality in 2022... Feel like people are just hyping this sim up for nostalgia sake... That's just my feeling about it, how do you feel? Am I missing something?

[@martinvandersandt4631]

Well said... People complain a lot about msfs bugs, but that normal when you're on the cutting edge of technology. When you're polishing an old engine like xplane, you will always have a more stable platform. Developer tools is another aspects. Its so much easier to developers for msfs, and that reflects in add on price, and amount of add ons available.

[@badubies]

Honestly I tried MSFS, I really tried to like it.. but I get 3 times more frames per second in vr with xplane 12 then msfs. MSFS is over vibrant, almost cartoonish. They really nailed the lighting in xp 12..

[@FrancescoSpace]

If MSFS didn’t exist, or if X-Plane 12 released two years ago, you wouldn’t say this is 2010 quality. MSFS is just setting the bar incredibly high with graphics, and they can because they own Bing and all of that.

[@Lyudol]

It’s not meant to be a competitor to MSFS. The whole point of X-Plane is to have really really good flight physics, environmental physics and systems simulation depth. The scenery that you see out of the window is just an accessory. X-Plane markets itself to serious flight simmers and pilot training establishments. And those markets only care about the aspects I mentioned before. It’s no coincidence that most professional pilot training simulators run X-Plane. MSFS on the other hand doesn’t aim to please those markets. They are more aimed for the casual simmers or just people looking to try a new game. Sure, the scenery and graphics are awesome, but for serious applications and purposes, it doesn’t cut it.

[@jcpflier6703]

Bravo 👏 I agree with you. I really think people need to stop acting like this is the new slice bread. Look, MSFS put the bar at the edge of the universe. Laminar aint going to reach that. They dont have the budgeting. They really need to focus on mobile phone simulation and making study level planes. I am willing to be that with time, Laminar will find itself the way of Sega. No one is going to want to spend hundreds/thousands of dollars trying to get Xplane to look like what MSFS looks like out the box.

[@Purely-Flight]

We knew this was coming.

[@matfar23]

After playing xplane 11 and switching to Msfs2020 it feels like flying in gta but I really miss the b737 xplane has. It felt like a real plane, it was extremely fps friendly and I truely miss the realism of the way the plane flys and feels that xplane gave me. I remember when outa no where they updated that vuelcan thing and it gave me 20fps so I really felt like the developers were with me unlike microsoft where they expect us to have high end system or your dead

[@greenlizardballs]

That is because msfs is basically gta doing a great job pretending to be a simulator. That's literally what it is.

[@Deltaexe190]

@@greenlizardballsno, fenix a320 pmdg 737 has awesome physics that outdo all xplane physics

[@alderlake12th]

Xplane 12 like add new planes and graphcis overhaul. Almost, they love Aero GUI in Windows Vista and Windows 7

[@maltimoto]

"Fremdschämen" is the german word if you feel very ashamed for someone else, in this case Laminar Research. Clouds, puddles, ice, everything looks a little weird. Ground textures are horrible. No satellite scenery. The only thing speaking for XP are the flight phyics which are really good. I don't know. I am a big XP 11 fan but XP 12 is not enough to justify 60 $.

[@lehgohyt6651]

swiss needs to reach one million subs

[@itsnoah4276]

I think I would still prefer msfs

[@FuryMDT]

I have been waiting all week for a new x-plane 12 video review!!!

[@Karl-cg9cv]

This cockpit is the best freeware ive seen so far... Zibo 737: am i a joke to you?

[@Zinericks]

Swiss whenever a new flight simulator appears: IS THIS THE NEW BEST FLIGHT SIMULATOR???

[@ThorntonWillie]

Oh yeah the a330 using a bare bones 737 fmc is just saf

[@goldenultra]

You can't do historic flights because the maps are present day. 😮

[@averageboeing737]

Cant wait for someone to do something for the A330 like the 737 ZIBO.

[@mattcrazy7070]

Msfs came out and they panicked, polished up x plane 11 a little bit, and slapped a new tittle and 60 dollar price tag on it.

[@TomTom-iz3ot]

I think x-Plane always looks so blank, the windows don’t look transparent

[@shaanfliesplanes]

THIS MAN called legit Portland, Oregon SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

[@drpenguin57]

FS2020 has a replay mode now. You have to enable it in dev tools currently but it's there

[@Grizzly50450]

Yea I have used it, compared to XP though, it is trash

[@Mr.Martini549]

And it's so, so bad.

[@oscar.mistry3502]

Geez last time i was this early, the 707 was in service

[@leroi804]

Not even close to MSFS20... sorry but it still looks like a 2010 game.... it doesn't matter how deep the simulation is.... Flying is also about visuals, graphics and scenery. In terms of simulation, MSFS20 is also getting close to study level with payware addons as well as some freeware.

[@iamanioitfromroblox]

the thing is, early access was 60 bucks but full release base was free. I got x-plane 12 for free but paid the cost of an hour - long download.

[@iamanioitfromroblox]

And it is available on mac! Yes!!!

[@jwattie144]

I like the UI better in Xplane and I like how easy it is to remap controls compared to FS2020.

[@Zelimited]

FINALLY

[@ThePilotFish-zx4in]

Im actually starting to get into the flight simmer stuff and im really excited to try some of the stuff out. I think im just gonna start with msfs and work my way through there.

[@JamesSmith123456789]

This game is over Hyped.

[@SwissLegoBuilder]

X-plane 12 is really good even without satellite scenery, especially the ATC and the animated jetways. A lot of people (from what I’ve seen) forget this is still not the final release and is in alpha

[@aviay]

It's competitors also have ATC capabilities though, VATSIM is multi-platform.

[@aileronsintowind6835]

@@aviay msfs ATC is horrendous it’s no better than Xplane 11 ATC and not everyone wants to fly on vatsim or pilot edge. I love flying on vatsim but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. 12 is a huge update to that

[@Sheza58]

Another youtuber who loves the sound of their own voice

[@chapaaviation7521]

Tbh, I will probably stick with xplane 11 as it has more addons that can make the game look so much better

[@Das_Mx]

Fax,but when they add all the x plane 11 addons to xp12 im definitely buying it

[@090giver090]

@@Das_Mx Let's just pray that addon developers don't force us to re-buy these addons again (like it sometimes was when X-Plane updated from 10 to 11)

[@ZeKermet]

Xp11: chilling Msfs2020: exists Xp devs: competition alert panic Xp devs: xp12 :D

[@masflow09]

MSFS: not even bother by it

[@maltimoto]

Very mixed feelings here. I have 2600 hours in XP 11 and bought XP 12. Installed my Toliss A321. Depending on the weather, really bad performance and stuttering. Flight Factor does not work at all. Zibo works, but some things like wipers dont. Orthos work but they show the "old" trees. I have enough of XP 12, I will use MSFS for the next weeks. XP 12 is underwhelming and unfinished.

[@florky_01]

finally.... the xplane 12 has been fucking released FINALLLLYYYYYY BABYYYY MORE BEAUTIFUL SWISS001 XP12 CONTENT

[@pmaschke]

Bought it because I got excited by the PR....then I realized it looks and feels exactly like 11....the puddles are aweful, the physics stink let alone collision triggers...(flew through a Boeing and terminal before it triggerd a smoking effect). The lessons are the exact same as in 11 and here I was lead to believe that it would be a new and exciting thing....very disappointed....

[@mehmettakbas9193]

Nothing can stop MSFS2020

[@theaviatior3631]

I’m very excited about X-Plane 12, gonna try it on Sunday. Love your videos Nick!

[@stephenbrown2367]

Mind Blowing graphics lol.

[@NoobWarsGames]

I love both flight simulators, but FS2020 clearly is way better in graphics and entertainment, I don't see the superiority of x-plane, It's a good flight simulator but it still doesn't beat fs2020 in a lot of things, I feel like in xp12 the developers really just spend more time on the graphics and surroundings of the map more then actually fixing some of their freeware planes. I have flown the c172 before and the handling of the aircraft felt way different then fs and x-plane, and based on what I saw in your video x-plane kind of just looked the same but with upgraded shaders and a higher budget to develop. The hype of the flight simulator is overrated, but the same goes for fs2020. Still good flight simulators tho.

[@Deltaexe190]

i fly the 172 in real life and the msfs plane behaves much more like the real aircraft then xplane with the default, but the 172 addon for xplane is true to life and it’s great

[@NoobWarsGames]

I feel like this is also because MSFS has a reputation from 2020 because in 2020 their plane physics weren't good at all.. I still love XPlane but MSFS is definitely a contender soon, just have to give them some time though.@@Deltaexe190

[@BestIkeaTable]

12:59 Swiss has a stroke lmao

[@nytstalker1380]

The quality of the A330 model is quite disappointing. I really want to like this but overall it just cannot compete with the resources that MSFS has.

[@Giamma27]

Let's go xplane12! Yessss, i was waiting for you to playing it

[@superextempman]

My opinion: Xplane had a good run while Microsoft was out of the flight sim game... But now it's in a losing battle against the big boys If your into serious flight simming with an accurate flight model or virtual flight training go with Xplane If your a casual flight simmer who values visuals and sightseeing go with FS Simple as that If your just getting into flight simming regardless of what simulator you use we welcome you it's a fun hobby Five years ago I never even messed with one and now it's one of the things I enjoy

[@bosnianaviation5531]

I'm flying now from Seoul Incheon to Kunming Wujiaba in the MSFS and watching your video.

[@CaptainQuinn001]

I LITERALLY JUST BOUGHT MSFS 2 WEEKS AGO, BOUGHT PMDG 737-800 YESTERDAY AND NOW X-PLANE 12 IS OUT?!

[@090giver090]

Yeah, crack is MUCH cheaper than flight simming ;)

[@spectacularflying3905]

That’s no problem because msfs 2020 is better

[@Lou1-1-r9p]

Msfs has graphics Xplane has physics

[@CaptainQuinn001]

@@Lou1-1-r9p that comment was from 1yr ago lmao

[@carboy1198]

Very good - swiss The next day: Queen elisheth II dies Me : ayo what the

[@SaturnEdits_YT]

it is amazing but takes sooo long to download ⬇⬇

[@SpriteRoblox1]

Fr

[@hbekdanon2749]

Xplane: we have now got volumetric clouds! GeoFS which has had them for over a year now:

[@cadenwagner8668]

Tbh I can’t see myself playing this sim right now with having a very nicely modded and much much improved version of msfs right now, who knows maybe I’ll get it in the future when more detailed aircraft are made for the sim

[@akulchadha2069]

How to improve that game bro?

[@cruza1289]

Let’s remember. MSFS is arcade for kids ( hence why it’s out on Xbox) X plane is for real pilots as the physics are very accurate

[@ncaviationfilms]

Agreed

[@The-Night-Wolf]

I bought it, wanted to see what Xplane was like. Super happy with it tbh. The local airport I ujsed to work at is spot on to the real thing, and it isn't even a big airport.

[@kemi242]

X Plane improved a lot on graphics, but MSFS still looks a lot better. X Plane is better having a damn replay mode, which we are still waiting for two years for Microsoft/Asobo to implement properly.

[@imaingan4884]

I don't know what it is... but for some reason i still view msfs2020 as more realistic, i mean don't get me wrong it looks amazing and all but i just don't know what's letting it down...

[@xepic_c7901]

bruh msfs is so realistic that it doesn’t look like real life

[@imaingan4884]

@@xepic_c7901 fair

[@bump_qmud]

i like those new runways and trees its just B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L.

[@kadenz4989]

Unfortunately, I think its a shame that the developers dare to release such an unfinished game. In times where we have the access to a game like MSFS, this is just not a threatening competetitor, more a parody of it. I can understand people that they rely on 100% perfectly accurate physics, but who can actually proof that MSFS´s physics in payware addons like the FENIX are so much worse? And we can say that most of us will not be flying any of these planes in real life, so we will not be abled to make an own experience to compare- that we have to leave to the professionals. And again, if you still prefer the 1000% proper physics of an airplane, there are still opportunites to get your hands on, like P3D, which is of course used in real life simulators of proper airlines aswell. I did play XP11 for a long time, too. But this rather minor enhancement of a game, that already exists, is too weak. So, my question is: Why releasing such a game if we already have both, the visuals and absolutely sufficient flight physics for a normal all- day life sim- pilot? And a hardcore simulation like P3D if people want to dive into it. Why holding on to a legacy that desperately tries to maintain its existence, while the game barely outperforms the predecessor, neither any of its competition. I think it quite embarrissing and relying on add ons is the wrong approach to a freshly released game. I hoped that we could see more than that, because this is just a poor misfire. Regards

[@mkhululimoyo5203]

Can't wait to try Xplane 12

[@ALX65]

I didn't know it was already out lmao 😅 so is it like huge added improvements from x-plane 11,or it's like litteraly a entire newly made simulator??🤔 either way it looks....worse than expected tbh,If I had x-plane 11 I wouldn't buy the 12 just stick with the 11😕 like no ENORMOUS changes that I can notice. Well ok the planes definitely look better hats off to that🤗😎👍💙 the tire smoke is ugly af but just ignore that lol😐

[@powerstone3626]

It's not officially out yet. This is only early access.

[@ALX65]

@@powerstone3626 okok👍

[@prezent1979]

Just letting you know that “animation” is to make 3d stuff move aka animated. When you talk about the body of a plane or… the… Empire State for example, it’s a 3d model, but has NOTHING to do with 3d animation.

[@stevennagley3407]

It’s an effect

[@SpleenathonOfficial]

They got the best physics of any publicly viable flight simulator out there.

[@uraymeiviar]

just not physics of photon, because they cant simulate photon correctly

[@masflow09]

says who?

[@uraymeiviar]

@@masflow09 ofcourse say me

[@SpleenathonOfficial]

@@masflow09 the FAA

[@majoraviatior1611]

Dcs has better physics. I’m a real life pilot and it has the best physics of any consumer grade sim. Then xplane 2nd.

[@theottomanempirewillriseag7265]

Its all nice and all, but there is literally no reason (for me atleast) to invest in Xplane 12 while we have MSFS. Competition is always welcome but they are far behind MSFS atm.

[@xepic_c7901]

msfs graphics are way too realistic, it’s so realistic it’s not real life. Their physics are also trash. The FAA has approved X-Plane for IFR flying training and other training.

[@maccruncie9148]

@@xepic_c7901 most of the people that play theese simulator about 90-95% will never fly in rl because of the cost so it doesnt really matter, but at the end of the day its your own preferance

[@masflow09]

@@xepic_c7901 and what about the xplane is FAA approved? do you know you need more than xplane right. What about the hardware? without it means nothing.

[@xepic_c7901]

@@masflow09 the x-plane website also shows what hardware you need

[@masflow09]

@@xepic_c7901 do you have and logging hours for real life? i bet not

[@auwalyau]

Have been waiting for this video😍

[@hpharold23]

XP12 looks like slightly improve from XP11 with a price tag and bunch of bugs!! Performance is worse. A330 being featured has 737 FMC!!, What a load of crap! being on EA doesn't excuse it from criticism. I hope XP12 can better compete with msfs though, competition is always a good thing. Alot of this BS claims about flight physics is better than on XP... Wonder what qualifies? It feels on on-rail scripted for sure for on XP, Weather, wind, drag, airport elevation and air density don't matter much on XP as it feels scripted with not much simulation at all. Watch CFD for msfs: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hJXPYWqVbLWmjck

[@FL350Aviation]

the clouds looks likes MSFS medium settings clouds ! 😂

[@tennis2564]

Waiting for this for so long

[@sylwheeler8591]

hi swiss, im going on holidays on thrusday, i am flying tui.

[@JohnMemer201]

12:39 Swissy dont do it noooooooo

[@europe0017]

I think X-plane is trying senery but focusing on the planes the most altho msfs is really good x plane is worth it

[@-eLMango-]

XP12 just looks like XP11 on steroids. But basic cheap steroids. Good video pal 👍🏻

[@marchaine2187]

The ending „see yall goodnight… yeeee“

[@Infamousfour]

Day 2 of asking Swiss for making a video from turboprop flight simulator

[@machrider98]

MSFS: hold my beer, you look like fs2002

[@VakariukBohdan]

Bro?

[@officialbloxminer]

I think people are hating too much on XPlane12, it is after all early access and it is not at all the final release. I think we should wait a bit more and see what the future has in store for us for XPlane12. Also XPlane12 has not that many add-ons to download so who knows what it would look like with add-ons.

[@NeoAiR]

agreed

[@maccruncie9148]

reason of early access is because laminar was running out of money, thats my theory and 60 quid for a a330 with 737 mcdu 😂😂😂😂

[@NeoAiR]

@@maccruncie9148 maybe lol

[@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCA]

YES

[@Wadeadelphia76ers]

This very nice and nice a330 butter landing 8.9/10

[@jacksonsteele4309]

swiss saying seattle when he's in portland

[@superextempman]

If you download both MSFS and xplane 12... Your SSD: I'm never going to recover from this!

[@Soldiercivilwaryt]

2:45 i'm now starting to think that the lifeless people in X-plane has always had no soul 💀

[@Pilot-2020]

The reason why you would buy it when you already have msfs: more realistic planes

[@TheCudder4life]

Or you know.....buy the more realistic planes for the price of XP12.

[@masflow09]

@@TheCudder4life i’ll buy realistic planes for the price of xplane any day. You know you paying 60 for an upgrade?