Hey guys, if you enjoyed this video, please consider supporting me and my channel by liking and subscribing. If you want to contribute to help me continue to make more videos and improve the quality of my content, You can send a donation via: ➡paypal.me/syfetalk
@harunhussein8285Ай бұрын
When they are explaining the trinity they say a car has wheels,door,window but it is all still a car using that same logic they should mention all the 360 different body parts of Jesus in the trinity
@admanassas1853Ай бұрын
SYFE.... why did you literally agree with every point from Sam Shamoun.
@101CreeperEaterАй бұрын
The last edit🤣 Thanks for the clarification
@KeithWatney-vv2cfАй бұрын
According to your methodology when it come to attributing statements to Allah ^Allah reffers to himself as *He* are we to understand *He* as a male and then says he is a male but not like us?we are in the era where the scholars are many and the students are few if this is how these statements are to be understood then there's little difference between ur beliefs and Christianity
@filmyfun1Ай бұрын
@@KeithWatney-vv2cfSaying 'He' or 'us' or 'we' is not a attribute
@yamato_saitoАй бұрын
May Allah protect that muslim kid and strengthen his Iman Ameen
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Ameen 🤲🏾
@twoh3217Ай бұрын
Ameen
@aSlavebyVolitionАй бұрын
Ameen
@fourtryАй бұрын
Well....jesus christ still holy ever in human form and Muhammad is full of sin....big difference..... I from Malaysia jesus christ is the only salvation.🥰 Not Isa Islamic 🇲🇾✝️ Many ex Muslims here by the way......some people has been brainwashed since birth by Islam
@ISK_GgАй бұрын
Ameen
@deenbrahhhАй бұрын
im a revert muslim, an 80 year old woman who gave me my first quran, prayer mat, tasbih passed away today, please make dua for her. jazakAllah to everyone, i cannot express it enough; and to the christians in this comment section please shut up nobody is reading allat, and i looked into chrisitianity preislam and it was the most easily dissectable thing ive looked at.
@An86115Ай бұрын
May Allah forgive her and accept her in paradise Ameen
@AssyaroniАй бұрын
Innalillaahi wa innailaihi raaji'uun
@Faiez-rh1gmАй бұрын
May Allah SWT grant her Jannah
@JEAGERlSTАй бұрын
@@An86115, ameen.
@muhammedalimiАй бұрын
Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilehi Rajiun. Robiigfrili walmuminina walmuminat walmuslimna walmuslimat walhayahi minkum Walamuwat, Amin Ya Allah
@IraniansunnimuslimАй бұрын
Alhamdulillah for truth! May God grant us all knowledge and guide us to sirat al-mustaqim. Even at a young age, he is more educated than billions of people.
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Indeed. May Allah SWT protect him and bless him and his parents
@omw-1425Ай бұрын
Someone who believed their god became a dependant man who (with all due respect) answered the call of nature like other humans has to be one of the most memorable jokes I have ever heard in my entire life.
@TwistedBlood-cb5wiАй бұрын
Jude 14-15 is clear copy of 1 Enoch 1:9 which church considers it APOCRYPHAL Behold, theLord is coming amid his holy myriads =Behold, he comes with ten thousand holy ones to execute judgment on all, =to execute judgment upon all,and he will destroy all the ungodly and to convict all souls for all =and convict all flesh of all the works of their wicked works that they did wickedly, = their ungodliness which they have ungodly committed, and for all the hard things = and of all the arrogant and hard words that wicked sinners spoke against him. = which sinners have uttered against him.
@fourtryАй бұрын
Well....jesus christ still holy ever in human form and Muhammad is full of sin....big difference..... I from Malaysia jesus christ is the only salvation.🥰 Not Isa Islamic 🇲🇾✝️
@TwistedBlood-cb5wiАй бұрын
“holy” christian Jesus 😂😂:- 1-why did Jesus talk in parables ? he said “knowledge isn’t for them” (Matthew 13: 10); he even refuse sharing information; what a lovely jesus !! 2-he teaches racism even with needy people (Matthew 15:21-28) 3- he call people adulterous generation for just asking for a sign !! (matthew 16: 4) 4- hypocrisy: Jesus orders people to turn other cheek (matthew 5: 39) but he didn’t (Jhon 18: 23)
@TwistedBlood-cb5wiАй бұрын
Christian still comparing their “god” with HUMAN 😂😂 maybe cuz their “god” is :- Isaiah 7: 20 God shαving people legs like M A l D 😂😂 after renting razor ; why “creator of universe” rents 😂😂 God sleeps and wakes and he also like drunk man; Psalm 78: 65 Then the Lord awoke as from sleep, like a strong man shouting because of wine. 😂😂 Genesis 32 (God wrestle Jacob and L0 SE!!)
@TwistedBlood-cb5wiАй бұрын
GOD according to bible:- Isaiah 7: 20 God shαving people legs like M A l D 😂😂 after renting razor ; why “creator of universe” rents 😂😂 God sleeps and wakes and he also like drunk man; Psalm 78: 65 Then the Lord awoke as from sleep, like a strong man shouting because of wine. 😂😂 Genesis 32 (God wrestle Jacob and L0 SE!!)
@ryan6140Ай бұрын
I heard an imam say it perfectly. "Yes Allah has a foot but its not the same foot as you and I. A clock has two hands and so do you but they are not the same. A mountain has a foot but it is not the same as yours". So it makes complete sense alhamdulilah❤ Also subhanallah that child is intelligent.
@letmetalk2240Ай бұрын
It could also be metaphor, allegory. There is nothing like Allah SWT.
@sorrttАй бұрын
qadr mushtarak
@AdamFirdaus-wm2xmАй бұрын
@@letmetalk2240no it is not a metaphor only deviants believe this
@_nuanceАй бұрын
No it doesn't make sense, because Adam was created based on the image of God, so supposedly, we might not be as perfect as God, but we look like him.
@AdamFirdaus-wm2xmАй бұрын
@@_nuance there is nothing like onto Allah. The hadith you think you know (which you really dont cuz u dont know arabic probably no offense) refers to the attributes which man has like hearing seeing which Allah also has but of course Allah sight and hearing is not like ours as he hears and sees everything
@YousufS16Ай бұрын
if a kid who hasn't hit puberty yet knows the correct Aqeeda, there is no excuse for anyone else.
@AdrianMuslimАй бұрын
100000000000000000000%
@hamzanocapАй бұрын
The kid hasn't fallen prey to his own arrogance, may Allah protect him from himself and others.
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
Just like aisha when she was playing with her dolls. But rasulallah was pdf file who mou nted on aisha, when she was still playing with dolls. I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
@AdrianMuslimАй бұрын
@@greenbird679 Aisha's betrothal was at 6. Then waited with her family for 3 years to be ready, and then marriage was consummated at 9, at puberty. Pedophilia involves: 1. Children and 2. Lust/intercourse outside marriage. None of these exists in Aisha's marriage as child by definition is below puberty, and Aisha was at puberty during marriage consummation. And lusting/intercourse outside marriage is forbidden in Islam. Aisha's marriage was celebrated by Aisha, her family and people outside the family. Marriage at puberty existed in all human history and exists in all religions including Christianity. Only recently seculars changed this for the sake of women's institutional education and work/career. So you just happened to exist in a unique time and place where they changed this and you’re assuming that this is the golden standard when it’s not. BTW, The old tradition still exists today. A 9 year old girl can get married to an older man TODAY BY LAW IN USA, California along with other places with parents consent. .
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
@@AdrianMuslim but aisha was with prophet when she was playing with dolls and playing with dolls allowed only for pre-pubescent girls. So, your theory fails.
@daily_dose_of_pollsАй бұрын
In fact if you watch the debate, Sam and Jay never tried to refute their logical contradiction on trinity, but instead tried to imply it on Islam (which got refuted) and for the full 3 hours, they left without answering the first question by Daniel.
@syfetalkАй бұрын
The Christians refused to explain the trinity during the debate because they knew they will just expose the polytheistic nature of such belief
@Ayoub1428-j9uАй бұрын
Logic and philosophy is a bad thing , we Muslims reject it Alhamdulilah
@HereItsNowАй бұрын
They always dosent answer their fu 'cking problem but pull islam into and starts to yap thats it
@kinetic3971Ай бұрын
@@HereItsNow That's their strategy. Trinity is pure nonsense gibberish and don't make sense.
@thatochakane5084Ай бұрын
@@syfetalk Haqiqatjou and his friend never explained why allah has body parts.
@auctorauthor8375Ай бұрын
@syfetalk Assalaamu'alaykum akhi. I really appreciate that you are clear cut in presenting the true Aqīdah of the Salaf without beating around the bush. I testify to Allah and His Kalamullah that you spoke only the truth, and may those who refuse to submit to this truth be guided before they are demanded an answer in Judgement Day. Barakallahu fiikum to you and your family and teachers.
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Wa Alaikumu Salam Wa Rahmatu Allahi Wa Barakatuhu. We are living in a time of fitnah, and I believe we need to do more in promoting the attributes of Allah SWT since many Muslims think it's okay to collaborate with deviant people who lie and deny the attributes of our creator.
@Ligg7099Ай бұрын
We need to believe in the ambiguous verses of the Quran without trying to interpret it that way. "And the Face of your Lord will remain, full of majesty and honor." (Ar-Rahman 55:27) This verse here emphasizes the enduring and majestic nature of Allah’s essence. Allah didn't reveal this verse to tell you that He has a face. The only meaning of this verse is only known by Him. But we can take a lesson from this verse. By reading this verse, we can understand that while everything in creation is transient, Allah's presence and attributes remain permanent and glorious. Allah has a face or not, wallahua'lam. And the meaning of the ambiguous verses only Allah knows but we can interpret them in multiple ways to take lessons from them. Taking lessons is important not knowing Allah having hands or legs. So when you see ambiguous verses, take lessons instead of concluding this and that. "It is He who has sent down to you the Book. In it are verses that are precise-they are the foundation of the Book-and others that are ambiguous. As for those in whose hearts is deviation, they will follow that of it which is ambiguous, seeking discord and seeking its hidden meanings. But no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say, 'We believe in it. All of it is from our Lord.' And no one will remember except those of understanding." Surah Al-Imran (3:7) Read my comment and answer it, you Salafi. The person who started your Salafi sect was a terrorist. His followers rebelled against the ottomans and massacred Taif and got weapons from the Brits to conquer Medina. Are you one of them?
@Ligg7099Ай бұрын
@@syfetalkWe need to believe in the ambiguous verses of the Quran without trying to interpret it that way. "And the Face of your Lord will remain, full of majesty and honor." (Ar-Rahman 55:27) This verse here emphasizes the enduring and majestic nature of Allah’s essence. Allah didn't reveal this verse to tell you that He has a face. The only meaning of this verse is only known by Him. But we can take a lesson from this verse. By reading this verse, we can understand that while everything in creation is transient, Allah's presence and attributes remain permanent and glorious. Allah has a face or not, wallahua'lam. And the meaning of the ambiguous verses only Allah knows but we can interpret them in multiple ways to take lessons from them. Taking lessons is important not knowing Allah having hands or legs. So when you see ambiguous verses, take lessons instead of concluding this and that. "It is He who has sent down to you the Book. In it are verses that are precise-they are the foundation of the Book-and others that are ambiguous. As for those in whose hearts is deviation, they will follow that of it which is ambiguous, seeking discord and seeking its hidden meanings. But no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say, 'We believe in it. All of it is from our Lord.' And no one will remember except those of understanding." Surah Al-Imran (3:7) Read my comment and answer it, you Salafi. The person who started your Salafi sect was a terrorist. His followers rebelled against the ottomans and massacred the peiple of Taif. They also received weaponry support from the Brits to conquer Medina. If you follow a terrorist what does that make you?
@SomaliEmperorАй бұрын
Jazakullah Khayr Syfe you don’t listen to lie and I will make dua for you so you may be a stronger-willed Muslim.
@syfetalkАй бұрын
May Allah SWT bless you and reward you for your kind words and support
@SomaliEmperorАй бұрын
@@syfetalk Thank you
@rox4653Ай бұрын
Lol it's funny why those s tupid contradected pagans man's worshipers talking about the hands or the foot of Allah when their god has hands and feet and a dick and a hole in his azz to poop from🤦♂️😂😂
@namakubento9276Ай бұрын
@@syfetalk You believe hand of Allah is in literal sense theres no hand in known literal meaning other than BODY PARTS or Physical things Now Youre saying youre not mujassim? Good luck with that
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
but, why we need to follow rasulallah. Rasulallah was pdf file who mou nted on aisha, when she was still playing with dolls. I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
@ahmednasrulla4766Ай бұрын
Muslim lantern is a real champion of islam
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
Why we need to follow rasulallah who was fra ud . He invented verses to suit his needs. Ex: when companions of rasulallah accused him of ste aling red velvet under garment, he pretend to get quran revelation 3 : 161 , saying "it is not for the for prophet to embezzle..". We get the context of this in tafseer al jalalayn. Q1: Why his own companions started accusing rasulallah in the first place? Won't you think there is something fishy with the missing under garment? Q2: If allah was real god, he would have shown who stole the red velvet, instead of telling that rasulallah is not thi ef. Why can't allah reveal the actual culprit? Please check the tafseer al jalalayn of quran 3 : 161.
@HTrntrsАй бұрын
@@greenbird679 Get a life niq.
@ahmedmostafa-ok5bu12 күн бұрын
@@greenbird679do u have any proof that he invented verses , NO Do u have any authentic evidence that the true companions accused the prophet, NO And if so, even it’s not true, the verse already denies it, but there’s no proof that the companions said a thing anyways And the real fraud is the god which u worship who descended as a human to get killed and humiliated by a bunch of romans, most of us live our live without getting humiliated by others like your weak pathetic god who is cursed according to paul the lier who says that ur god i a curse in galatians 3:13
@bossOROS4 күн бұрын
@@greenbird679 12:48
@shadygamererfan377Ай бұрын
Thanks for clearing my akidah may Allah be pleased with you and your beautiful work.
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
btw, why we need to follow rasulallah who was fra ud . He invented verses to suit his needs. Ex: when companions of rasulallah accused him of ste aling red velvet under garment, he pretend to get quran revelation 3 : 161 , saying "it is not for the for prophet to embezzle..". We get the context of this in tafseer al jalalayn. Q1: Why his own companions started accusing rasulallah in the first place? Won't you think there is something fishy with the missing under garment? Q2: If allah was real god, he would have shown who stole the red velvet, instead of telling that rasulallah is not thi ef. Why can't allah reveal the actual culprit? Please check the tafseer al jalalayn of quran 3 : 161.
@Narrator_of_Tarikh07Ай бұрын
I remember seeing a live stream of Shamounian where he was in his bathroom literally begging his viewers : "Please send me some money ! I need some money !" 😂
@omw-1425Ай бұрын
Who's that in ur pfp?
@Narrator_of_Tarikh07Ай бұрын
@@omw-1425Hasan I, the 17th ruler of the 'Alawi dynasty that still rules Morocco to this day...
@TheChamp91100Ай бұрын
@@Narrator_of_Tarikh07AND WHERE ARE UR SOLUTIONS MY FRIEND?
@IraniansunnimuslimАй бұрын
@@Narrator_of_Tarikh07 fancy seeing you here
@TwistedBlood-cb5wiАй бұрын
Bible God creates day& night before sun😂😂 Job 26:11 heaven has pillars😂😂 Psalm 58:8 slug melts during walking 😂😂 Proverbs 6:7 Ants don't have ruler😂😂 Genesis 1:11 plants exist before sun 😂😂 Leviticus 11:6 The rabbit, though it chews the cud😂😂
@Ondonol_Ай бұрын
Finaly Syfe made a video abut this!
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
but, why we need to follow rasulallah who was fra ud . He invented verses to suit his needs. Ex: when companions of rasulallah accused him of ste aling red velvet under garment, he pretend to get quran revelation 3 : 161 , saying "it is not for the for prophet to embezzle..". We get the context of this in tafseer al jalalayn. Q1: Why his own companions started accusing rasulallah in the first place? Won't you think there is something fishy with the missing under garment? Q2: If allah was real god, he would have shown who stole the red velvet, instead of telling that rasulallah is not thi ef. Why can't allah reveal the actual culprit? Please check the tafseer al jalalayn of quran 3 : 161.
@agra6077Ай бұрын
May Allah bless this child his entire life, raise him to be a strong and strong-willed, good-hearted man, and bless him with many many blessings in this life and the next, with the highest ranks of Jan'nah for his knowledge from youth
@Ajmolali82Ай бұрын
Ibn Abbas reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, *“Reflect deeply upon the creation, but do not reflect upon the essence of the Creator. Verily, His essence cannot be known other than to believe in it.”* Source: Musnad al-Rabī’ 742 Grade; Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
but Rasulallah was pdf file who mou nted on aisha, when she was still playing with dolls. I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
@kebbakassama3997Ай бұрын
Well done Akhi for refuting their lies. May Allah protect you and elevate you. I miss the Debunked Series. I hope to see it soon insha Allah.❤
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Inshaellah new Debunked video after 2 videos
@boriserjavec6470Ай бұрын
whAT LIES??? he just agreed with everything sam said about allah having body parts
@deevillАй бұрын
..stated simply and beautifully.. may Allah guide us all on the straight path.. wallahu'alam (Allah knows all, Allah knows best!)
@toolate6971Ай бұрын
Finally, you are getting to the correct dawah! None should give dawah until they know Islam very well.
@tassmann3481Ай бұрын
ALHAMDULLAH May ALLAH BLESSED YOU MORE
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Jazakallah Khair. May Allah SWT, the creator of the heavens and the earth, grant you the best reward in this life and the next
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
past tense or future tense of blessing?
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
btw, why we need to follow rasulallah who was fra ud . He invented verses to suit his needs. Ex: when companions of rasulallah accused him of ste aling red velvet under garment, he pretend to get quran revelation 3 : 161 , saying "it is not for the for prophet to embezzle..". We get the context of this in tafseer al jalalayn. Q1: Why his own companions started accusing rasulallah in the first place? Won't you think there is something fishy with the missing under garment? Q2: If allah was real god, he would have shown who stole the red velvet, instead of telling that rasulallah is not thi ef. Why can't allah reveal the actual culprit? Please check the tafseer al jalalayn of quran 3 : 161.
@sapieearshad9105Ай бұрын
@@greenbird679 Green with envy, fly away
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
@@sapieearshad9105 btw, nice coping 😁
@mohamedbinishaq3169Ай бұрын
May Allah guide Daniel.
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Ameen. May Allah SWT guide us all to the Sunnah of prophet Muhammad ﷺ according to the understanding of the Salaf
@son8620Ай бұрын
His statement is wrong this is the jahmi Ash'ari creed that the hand means power
@mohamedbinishaq3169Ай бұрын
@@son8620 yeah I know that Daniel is wrong this is why I said may Allah guide him.
@Soldier-Of-MahdiАй бұрын
@@mohamedbinishaq3169 i don't know why he said that it might also be his power etc As he once clearly said that he believes in Athari creed, and i believe he might be salafi or hanbali, so its unfortunate.
@mohamedbinishaq3169Ай бұрын
@@Soldier-Of-Mahdi me too I would never understand why he even said such a thing.
@usmanusman-lv2hyАй бұрын
I have been having a bad day today because I was rejected from the Dawah commitee at the muslim student association at my college, only to have this video tell me to not go engage in dawah until I put more effort into studying the creed of Islam. Inshallah I will do this. Alhamdulillah to the ways in which Allah works.
@Bilal-op6rtАй бұрын
Yeah study true aqeedah not this dirty wahabi aqeedah
@rox4653Ай бұрын
@@Bilal-op6rtlol shut up you stray polythist pagan Sufi or shia
@hamzanocapАй бұрын
@@Bilal-op6rtCalling Allah's name dirty is proof of your misguidance, SubxanAllah.
@raushanlatiff96Ай бұрын
If you have an editor, he deserves a raise. Barak Allah Feek.
@MustafizulIslam-w2yАй бұрын
Jazakallah brother ❤
@Vladimir9857Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillaah. Indeed we benefited from this video. May Allaah Azza Wajal increase your knowledge as well aameen.
@ayishabehardien6310Ай бұрын
Great video. Keep on posting brother.
@subhankeen7810Ай бұрын
walaikum assalam warahmatullahi wabarakatuh may Allah bless you for ur hard work ❤
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Jazakallah Khair
@YesMan7331Ай бұрын
Jay tried to claim that Old Testament Rabbi’s taught the trinity in his debate with Muslim Lantern, I nearly cried laughing.😂
@syfetalkАй бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@mzin536Ай бұрын
lmao when lantern asked him if the early christians had a united view jay refused to answer and kept contradicting himself
@keeperkeeper1510Ай бұрын
Didn't the trinity come 150 years after jesus?
@KernelMarineАй бұрын
@@keeperkeeper1510it did come later, around the 3rd or 4th century
@JC-o8qАй бұрын
@@keeperkeeper1510 - it may have been explicitly codified and coined as a term in such time, but 1) God has always been Triune, and 2) Christianity has known it from before Jesus' Ascension.
@tareksisaber4916Ай бұрын
Thank you so much brother this is the video where i learnd alot brother thanks and jazakallah ❤
@proudmuslimah4423Ай бұрын
So without wasting anytime lets watch the clips and come back 😊
@kibirigeahamed7557Ай бұрын
walahi syf i love you for the sake of Allah you always disprove anyone who tries to mess with islam and thx for the kid to teach the truth
@Roffazuid010Ай бұрын
Sam Shamoun is a biggest clown
@steveen2180Ай бұрын
scam shampoo
@mannmann8998Ай бұрын
scam sam
@syahminawi4733Ай бұрын
They are so busy with Allah's zat & attributes yet they forgot the worship a literal human being with human's body part.
@fancydoggyАй бұрын
What led you into Hellfire? "They will say we were not of those who prayed." (Qur'an 74:42-43) Don't forget your five daily prayers. ما الذي أدخلكم النار؟ "سيقولون لم نك من المصلين" (القرآن 74:42-43) لا تنسوا صلواتكم الخمس.
@tareksisaber4916Ай бұрын
Mashallah ❤ brother syfetalk got tired from correcting there mistakes so he got his student ❤🎉
@twoh3217Ай бұрын
Beautiful video ❤ may Allah SWT bless that Muslim kid ❤
@asadnazim6827Ай бұрын
Masha Allah Learning the correct Aqeedah is so so important
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
but, Rasulallah was pdf file who mou nted on aisha, when she was still playing with dolls. I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
@Blood-packАй бұрын
10:22 Allahu’Akbar, May Allah reward those children and keep them on the sunnah and sound understanding… Ameen…
@syfetalkАй бұрын
Ameen 🤲🏾
@Soldier_92Ай бұрын
yes you were fucking small children in Islam like Mohammed has horribly raped 6 years old Aysa she is dead at 18 years old vizehond Mohammed false stinking prophet
@fancydoggyАй бұрын
When one of you recites the Shahada (at the final part of salah/namaz), let him seek refuge in Allah from four things: "O Allah, I seek refuge in You from the punishment of "Hell, from the punishment of the grave, from the trials [fitnah] of life and death, and from the evil of the trial [fitnah] of the Antichrist [dajjal]" "إِذَا تَشَهَّدَ أَحَدُكُمْ فَلْيَسْتَعِذْ باللَّهِ مِن أَرْبَعٍ يقولُ: "اللَّهُمَّ إنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِن عَذَابِ جَهَنَّمَ، وَمِنْ عَذَابِ القَبْرِ، وَمِنْ فِتْنَةِ المَحْيَا وَالْمَمَاتِ، وَمِنْ شَرِّ فِتْنَةِ المَسِيحِ الدَّجَّالِ (allahuma 'iniy 'aeudh bik min eadhab jahanama, wamin eadhab alqabri, wamin fitnat almahya walmamati, wamin shari fitnat almasih aldajaal) Also, beware of gossiping, backbiting, idle talk, slander, not cleaning after yourself (well) when you finish your visit to the bathroom (get rid of all the impurities on your body parts, and clothes too with water). كذلك احذر من الغيبة والنميمة واللغو والقذف وعدم التطهر (حسناً) بعد الانتهاء من دخول الحمام (تخلص من جميع الشوائب الموجودة على أعضاء جسمك وملابسك أيضاً بالماء). Also say, اللهُمَّ اجْعَلْنَا مُفْلِحِينَ "O Allah make us of his righteous servants" (allhuma ajealna muflihin)
@ZiaulKАй бұрын
Allah can describe himself because he is the only one who can do so. For us however, we can't imagine those descriptions the way we see fit.
@Inspire_sagiАй бұрын
This video I specifically really enjoyed. Jazakallahu khairan
@fayedomar602Ай бұрын
Good advice brother jazakAllah khairan
@zero-x8579Ай бұрын
can i say something sheikh? (if you don't mind me calling you that), you are the first person that spoke about the 3 tawhid types, because all the self-proclaimed sheikhs that i listened to, arabs and non-arabs, only talked about pillars of islam and iman (which im not saying they are not important) but tawhid types is far more important. also i was delighted when you talked about takfir whoever liken Allah Almighty adjectives to our adjectives (hands for example). like they refrain from the topic of takfir, like its a matter that MUST NOT be discussed about. so salutes to you, and jazak Allah khairn عسى الله ان يهدي الجميع
@theologyroomАй бұрын
Remember these verses in the Bible: God's hand and arm are mentioned in Isaiah 23, Exodus 7, Psalm 89 and Isaiah 66. Isaiah 6 describes God as having a face and feet. The passage also tells us that God wears a robe and that there are angels standing ABOVE God. We also read that God uses their wings to cover His face and feet and even fly. God has eyes and ears according to Deuteronomy 11, 2Chronicles 16, and Psalm 34 God's feet and soles are mentioned in Exodus 24, Psalm 18 and Ezekiel 43. In Psalm 18, God is described as having nostrils that blow smoke, and a mouth that spews fire and coals. Deuteronomy 8 and Isaiah 1 mention God's mouth. According to Psalm 91 and Psalm 57, God has feathers and wings.
@yahayamuhammad4119Ай бұрын
This is not how to win a debate. It's just dismissal of criticism.
@theotherhaithamАй бұрын
Great video brother!
@itzrayyoАй бұрын
What a beautiful display by that child. ما شاء الله. May Allah increase us all in faith Ameen
@itzmewaleedАй бұрын
Jazakallah Hu Khairan kasira جزاک اللہ خیرا کثیرا
@YahyeAhmed-bq7gdАй бұрын
Thank u my brother in islam
@akupeanut109Ай бұрын
This video helps a lot wow such coincidence that I need this video to fix my understanding
@alfoolkАй бұрын
بارك الله فيك
@TatouLabKidsАй бұрын
Jazakhallahou khairan, good point: do not be shy neither be bothered by the questions of those non believers, you said we believe and we accept,
@daniyalrehan6287Ай бұрын
They think talking about Allah having arms and shins shows that Islam is a lie while they think their god was born
@facetofloor12 күн бұрын
Allah doesn’t have arms or shins or any other body parts or dimensions.
@abdulrahman_khd8584Ай бұрын
جزاك الله خير ❤
@PaNtHeR_IcHiGoАй бұрын
I'm really sorry, but I couldn't stop laughing when Sam started yapping !! 🤣👌
@loum490Ай бұрын
Well then he’s doing a good job because he is a clown 😂
@HashimTheRafidhiАй бұрын
This is why Christians could never lose to an argument from an Athaari Sunni. I believe in the Trinity my theology says we dont ask “how” its a mystery. Likewise you believe your God has hands feet blah blah but you dont ask how. It’s a mystery. 👏 well done.
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
Btw, what do you say about rasulallah? Rasulallah was pdf file who mou nted on aisha, when she was still playing with dolls. I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)
@HashimTheRafidhiАй бұрын
@@greenbird679 im Shia. Dont quote Sunni hadith as if its authoritative on me. Aisha was never 6. All lies spewed by her to discredit and defame the prophet peace upon him and his family. Every possible historian concludes Aisha was At minimum 16 years old with 23 years of age being most agreed upon. As a Christian you dimwit have no leg to stand on when criticizing sexual morality as your prophet Lot slept with both his daughters. Your Stupidity is beyond comprehension.
@ZainabuMuhammedАй бұрын
Watching a video early😎
@syfetalkАй бұрын
💪🏾
@austrianbeatboxchampАй бұрын
Beautifully put together, brother. May Allah bless you in every way and situation
@ItielbryceАй бұрын
That kid made me cry
@DraponDrakoАй бұрын
Jeremiah 1:9 Then the LORD reached out his HAND and touched my mouth and said to me, “I have put my words in your mouth.
@DeedatDawahАй бұрын
Assalamualikum, I could not be the first comment. I was waiting for this video as I requested. Thank you foe the video This video motivated me once again to learn more about my faith before debating Christianity. Can I het a book reccomendations for knowledge?
@zyadb_Ай бұрын
الحمد لله هناك من يعظم كتب السلف و الأئمة الحقيقيين و ليس أهل البدع. بارك الله فيك
@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خАй бұрын
Excellent
@syedosyedo6626Ай бұрын
MasyaAllah Akhi Well said Jazakallah Khair
@TECROCKHАй бұрын
ALLAHUMME BARİK😊😍
@jboy1098Ай бұрын
My brother ! May Allah be pleased with you! In the future I hope more people can get to know you ! May Allah use you in the best way possible to guide others inshallah! You have woke me up from so many things my brother ! May Allah reward you inshallah !
@theislamicfirewall7473Ай бұрын
Sorry brother .. every debate I see Christianity is winning ... in the comments section 😂😂😂😂
@syfetalkАй бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@MasudFahim-h2iАй бұрын
@@syfetalk Quran specially for Arabs surah Ibrahim verse 4
@mzin536Ай бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i nope where did u get that from the verse u quoted "We have not sent a messenger except in the language of his people to clarify ˹the message˺ for them. Then Allah leaves whoever He wills to stray and guides whoever He wills. And He is the Almighty, All-Wise." where in this verse does it say that quran is only for arabs?it simply says the messanger is sent with revelation with his people's language , jesus PBUH had his revelation with his language and his people's language and the same goes for all the prophets . U expect God to send revelation to prophets with a language they cant speak nor can their ppl? And the quran refutes ur argument : surat al anbya "We have sent you ˹O Prophet˺ only as a mercy for the whole world." prophet muhammad PBUH i sent for all mankind and he is the last and final messanger Hope this clears ur misunderstanding
@MasudFahim-h2iАй бұрын
@@mzin536 surah 14 verse 4 clearly mentione we have not sent a messenger except in the language of his people Almighty Allah specifically mentioned Arabs not for non Arab people & frankly speaking maximum Muslims belong non Arab Countries & they don't understand proper meaning of Quran verses
@khidhrkaraweetaАй бұрын
@@MasudFahim-h2i U clearly have no logic. How does this verse refute Islam ?
@xtaz666Ай бұрын
This guy is teaching us the wahabi aqida, but sunni muslims dont beleive in that. Dont fall in the trap. Yad, ain, etc are attributes that only Allah know the meaning, we do not say that Allah has to eyes, to hands, a leg and watever litteraly It's like a say The Chief of the General Staff is the head of the British Army, so you guys will say that the biritsh army has a had ?
@luvlybalugaАй бұрын
Indeed. Be easy on the brother though, inshallah Allah guides him from the wahabi manhaj and unite us all.
@outworlddevourer03Ай бұрын
When he said three type of tawheed i know where he is going to ..
@sheikhshakilakhtar1865Ай бұрын
This approach of yours; is it from the Sahaba?
@cedricbrs481Ай бұрын
@@sheikhshakilakhtar1865 It is , there is a huge gap between the salafs and salafis.
@xtaz666Ай бұрын
@@sheikhshakilakhtar1865 yes tafwid is from sahaba
@lychiadventures8231Ай бұрын
maasyaAllah..those kids are adorable yet wise. Brings tears of pride and somewhat humbled at the same time. I feel small in my knowledge compare to these kids. SubhaanAllah.
@HopeFear-sx6omАй бұрын
BarakAllahu feek very clear message we don't have to try and adhere to their feelings or beliefs we have Islam and we have to take it as it is. May Allah reward you for your tremendous work easy to digest eventhough your first language is not English.
@ihalludbA12 күн бұрын
Akhi, I don’t mean to send you any praise. Praises be to Allah but it’s good to see a brother spreading the haqq. I recently began to learn the deen starting with aqeedah and it was nice to see everything I learned in action. I’m motivated even more to keep going inshallah. مؤمن بكل ما وصف به الله نفسه و وصف رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم من غير تعطيل ولا تحريف و من غير تكييف ولا تمثيل
@arafat88ryuАй бұрын
I don't understand what's the Christian man point. Does God having hands, foot or eyes makes it's polytheism?
@proudmuslimah4423Ай бұрын
He knows it doesn't constitute polytheism, he simply wants to confuse people. They have no explanation for their trinity so they have to look for every other alternative.
@facetofloor12 күн бұрын
It’s polytheism because the one who thinks that Allah has a foot or shin or hands or the likes worships a body, and the worship of a body is a pagan/polytheist.
@adnankassem8114Ай бұрын
Jazakum Allahu Khayran brother. May Allah reward you for your great efforts. I just wanted to point out the way you pronounce Shin sounds like Chin which is something different. Chin is the lower part of the jaw, whereas the Shin is part between the foot and knee (on humans). Also the Hadeeth about the "waist" is not 100% interpreted by people of the Sunnah to be from the sifat. Some other riwayat of the hadith dont mention the "waist" - and some simalar hadith also dont mention the waist. But many of the Imams did interpret it as an attribute and Allah knows best. The other attributes mentioned though are 100% agreed upon by the people of Sunnah. But in all circumstances affirming Allah's attributes does not constitute anthropomorphism. Allah is perfect and unique and his attributes are not like that of the creation. Once again may Alalh reward you brother.
@twatikАй бұрын
3:38 Shin not Chin barakAllahu feek
@SultaniyanhanАй бұрын
It’s his accent
@twatikАй бұрын
@@Sultaniyanhanoh
@odeebob7826Ай бұрын
Brother, you are once again excellent, May Allah bless you
@greenbird679Ай бұрын
btw, Why we need to follow rasulallah who was fra ud . He invented verses to suit his needs. Ex: when companions of rasulallah accused him of ste aling red velvet under garment, he pretend to get quran revelation 3 : 161 , saying "it is not for the for prophet to embezzle..". We get the context of this in tafseer al jalalayn. Q1: Why his own companions started accusing rasulallah in the first place? Won't you think there is something fishy with the missing under garment? Q2: If allah was real god, he would have shown who stole the red velvet, instead of telling that rasulallah is not thi ef. Why can't allah reveal the actual culprit? Please check the tafseer al jalalayn of quran 3 : 161.
@zakariyajama8004Ай бұрын
Mashallah
@vunno846Ай бұрын
JazakAllahu khair for the video
@lemonbrev1968Ай бұрын
little kid is just answering questions, if my ear is correct, he ain't refuting any arguments from sam shamoun. so he is lying in the title
@MadmaxxiwaxyАй бұрын
he did. Sam thinks Muslims believe in anthropomorphism, but that's not true. The refutation to that is 42:11, which the kid stated. Think a little more
@JC-o8qАй бұрын
@@Madmaxxiwaxy- Muslims _do_ believe in anthropomorphism. "Allah has two right hands. Literally, not metaphorically. But they're different, like the hands of a clock - which is anthropomorphized." Because _any_ instance of referring to something by reference to the human body is _literally_ anthropomorphism. By definition, anthropomorphism is: "describing or depicting a thing by comparing or likening it (or its attributes) to the human form (and its attributes)."
@MadmaxxiwaxyАй бұрын
@@JC-o8q „there is nothing that can be compared to God“ is a verse in the Qur‘an. Considering this fact, muslims dont believe in anthropomorphism. Saying that God has hands, doesnt mean we compare our hands that we know how they look like, to Gods, because we cannot imagine how he looks like. He has hands, feet and other attributes named in the Qur‘an, this doesnt mean that we can imagine or compare our limbs to his. Therefore, Muslims dont believe in anthropomorphism, because, as said before, there is nothing comparable to God.
@JC-o8qАй бұрын
@@Madmaxxiwaxy - the act of saying "God has hands," _is_ anthropomorphizing God, by definition (see my previous reply). This holds even if you speak metaphorically. Now, it becomes "belief in" _anthropomorphism_ when you say, "God _literally_ has hands," like SYFEtalk here. Because hands are not attributes: they're appendages. Sight is an attribute: eyes are organs. Feet and Shins are _parts_ not attributes. Corporeality (physical embodiment) is an attribute: the attribute of having a body, which is _prerequisite_ to having hands, shins, and eyes - in any sense that is _not_ metaphorical. So, if you agree with SYFEtalk: you believe in anthropomorphism. There are Muslims in the comments here who denounce him, and insist that the Quran is strictly metaphorical when saying that God has hands, eyes, etc. - which literarily (and literally) makes sense, at least in isolation: but I understand that such a view opens up another can of worms entirely. **Side Note: Christians can say that "God has literal hands" without falling into the anthropomorphic trap, because that's how proper Trinitarian Theology works. I bring that up, because the crux of all this is the notion that God having literal hands without a body is supposedly perfectly sensible, but being or having 3 persons is supposedly nonsense. If you can accept that God has literal hands that are unlike anything we imagine (when though the _point_ of using words is to provoke and invoke our imagination): then you cannot also say it is impossible for God to exist singularly as 3 persons.
@Jesslyn-d7fАй бұрын
Allah ( Swt ) Doesn't Give You All The Detail's Some Times, He Just Say's " TRUST ME! "❤❤❤
@MCrowsW1Ай бұрын
Kid is the GOAT, Alhamdulilah for Islam 🤲
@Eeee-jАй бұрын
Can we say Greatest Of All Time? I mean Allahu Akbar is Allah is greatest right!?
@MohammedJ.Sheriff-nz5hoАй бұрын
I never regret subscribing to this channel. Alhamdulillah.
@raschiddavids3849Ай бұрын
It is the methodology of the people of the sunnah that these verses were ever interpreted. They believed in them, confirmed then and assigned the meanings to Allah. So, you stating directly and affirming directly the literal meaning of these verses is nothing but filthy anthropomorphic bidah.
@naeemulhoque1777Ай бұрын
May Allah, bless brother *Muhammed Ali* (The Muslim Lantern) for his work. I'm sure there are many shaikhs in Arabic language, but for us non-arabic people, brother Muhammed is a blessing. He is doing dawah and teaching people the correct Aqeedah in an easy to understand language.
@jesus_isamuslimАй бұрын
☝️Idol worshipers perceive God in human form while slandering Allah by lying about his qualities In Islam nothing is like God but he is all Seeing all Hearing. Quran 42:11, see also 112-4 While God in christianity has : Aye: like human Psalm 32:8 Face: Chronicles 16:11 Right hands: Hebrew 1:3, 12:2, 1 Peter 3:22, Acts 7:55-56, Only two right hands : Psalm 89:13, Isaiah 41:13, Lamentations 2:3, Habakkuk 2:16 Shin: Hebrew letter shin God's Teeth to chew food with, Psalm 119:161-168 Feet: Feet (or foot) occurs 315 time in Scripture.
@AokobilikisАй бұрын
Christian's don't bother checking your bible for the verses this guy surely have a problem in understanding scriptures maybe that's why he is a muslim. The bible says seek the face of God continually and his marvelous works. Does that mean God have a face. This s a disgrace to human ability to understand.
@jesus_isamuslimАй бұрын
@@Aokobilikis Fallacy! All these descriptions of Allah, such as the hand, the face, are misinterpretations by Christian apolegetics, so they are fabrications because Christians have been taught by their Bibles to perceive God in human form?? Allah does not have physical attributes similar to humans. God according to the Qur'an is beyond human understanding and cannot be compared to any of His creatures. Quran 42:11 : "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing.", and Quran 112:1-4 "Say, ‘He is Allah, [Who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent."
@loum490Ай бұрын
Don’t forget they believe god was a whole human who died for their sins lol
@AokobilikisАй бұрын
@@loum490 What part of incarnation don't you understand.
@AokobilikisАй бұрын
They have deleted my comment i don't know why but anyways i will say it again. fellow Christians don't stress your self checking the bible this guy surely have a problem understanding scriptures maybe that's why he is still a muslim. When they say seek the face of the lord continually and his strength does that mean God has a face. This is a disgrace to humans ability to understand certain verses. Is he a kid.
@ayyubkhalilguerraАй бұрын
Brother, your work & contributions of Helping enlighten the Ummah is wonderful, I Laughed at his brother that was trying to say something and was never asked🤭 Alhamdulillah, May Allah bless us all with Beutiful children that we have a bit of Knowledge to teach so they can defend themselves against the Dunya
@tassmann3481Ай бұрын
waALAIKUMUSSALam
@alusinebah2045Ай бұрын
Shukran brother Syfe Jazakhalahu Khairan my brother
@Soldier_92Ай бұрын
Like Mohamed fake prophet pedofiel fuck Aysa 6 years girl mother fucker prophet dog Mohamed kafir billah Mohammed seytaan Mohammed 11 womens sexmaniak🤣🤣🤣
@armanddani1335Ай бұрын
Bro, you are Lost definitely. Being an Arab, doesn't mean you understand Quran. To fully grasp the language of the Quran, it is essential to understand the Arabic of the Quraysh. Mastery of this dialect provides deeper insight into the Quran's linguistic and cultural nuances, as it reflects the common expressions and modes of communication of the Quraysh Arabs prior to the advent of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). The consensus is that to understand the content of the Quran, one must become familiar with the comprehension and cultural context of Quraysh Arabic. This is because Allah SWT chose the Prophet (SAW) from among them, the Quraishy, for reintroducing Himself (the Creator's attributes) to humankind, starting with the Quraysh tribe. Quraishy Arabs wouldn't ask about the meaning of those phrases because all the while they understood every single of them as it is. Consider the following illustrative examples of commonly used Arabic figures of speech among the Quraysh: 1. **"Both Right Hands"**: This phrase signifies absolute correctness or rightness. It connotes that something is infallibly correct. For instance, saying "Both my right hands on that case" means "I am always right about that; I have never been wrong and am always correct." 2. **"Look at one's chin"**: This expression means that the reference is solely to the individual in charge or in question, without any ambiguity. For example, something happened here, if someone asks or wants to know what happened here yesterday, and the only person to refer to is also the one who knew about it was there, you would say to the questioner, "Just look at his/her chin." 3. **"Both Hands"**: This term implies exerting full power and effort directly, and doing so entirely alone, without any assistance or sharing of responsibility. For instance, "I built the house with both hands" means that the task of building the house, from start to finish, was completed with complete personal power and effort directly, without sharing the responsibility with anyone else. ----------------- In the case of Allah SWT, Adam, and Iblis: Adam was created by Allah's power directly without any intermediary, meaning he had No parents. In contrast, Iblis was also created by Allah's power but through an intermediary, meaning Iblis had parents. That's why Iblis never questioned Allah's claim about applying Full power (both hands) directly without Sharing in the Creation of Adam. That is why Iblis never denied that Adam was created by Allah's power alone, directly by "Kun fa Ya Kun." -------------------- Many many more Expression of Speeches in the Arabic of Quraishy. These examples showcase the tribal expressions prevalent among the Quraysh, which are embedded within the Quran's Arabic and enrich its understanding. The consensus is that convincing others that Allah has a chin & Allah's chin is unlike human chin is also considered KAFIR because "the chin" itself is a creation or part of creation.
@werenothesameАй бұрын
👏🏻
@ctdot3866Ай бұрын
الحمدلله
@mub3adyАй бұрын
جزاك الله خير ووفقك
@Imnotyou155Ай бұрын
Salafiyyah all the way forth🎉🎉🎉
@sullyrajaАй бұрын
May Allah guide you to the right path
@Imnotyou155Ай бұрын
@@sullyraja May Allah keep me firm on it cause He already guided
@AliyahMohammed-p6pАй бұрын
May Allah guide all children from these people who force others to go against Tawheed and Allah teachings AMEEN.
@JahilExposedАй бұрын
ما شاء الله
@abumustafa4651Ай бұрын
For the part of the video where the kid is answering questions about belief, when he said His rising over the throne means elevation in exaltedness, where is the evidence of that? As people of Quran and Sunnah, we accept the apparent meaning of the texts without adding our own interpretation from ourselves.
@CosmicCritque312Ай бұрын
Scholars of Islamic creed (Aqeedah), particularly those from the schools of Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah, argue for this view based on both Quranic principles and logical reasoning. Below is an outline of the evidence they use: 1. The Principle of Allah’s Transcendence (Tanzīh) Islamic theology strongly emphasizes that Allah is beyond any physical limitations or attributes similar to creation. This is based on numerous Quranic verses that highlight Allah’s transcendence over creation: "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing." (Quran 42:11) This verse clarifies that Allah does not resemble creation in any way. If Allah is unlike anything in creation, His "rising" or "istiwā'" must also be understood in a way that is befitting His majesty, without implying physical elevation or movement. "And He is with you wherever you are." (Quran 57:4) This indicates that Allah’s presence is not confined to a specific location. His knowledge, power, and authority extend everywhere, which challenges the idea of Allah being physically located above the Throne. 2. Interpretation of "Istiwa" by Early Scholars Many early Islamic scholars, particularly from the Ash'ari and Maturidi schools of theology, interpreted "istiwa" as referring to Allah's dominion and exaltedness in authority, not physical elevation. They point to linguistic and contextual reasons: The Arabic word "Istiwa'" can have multiple meanings, such as "settling," "ascending," "rising," or "taking control." In the context of Allah, scholars argue it should be understood metaphorically as establishing control and power over the universe. Imam Malik’s famous response when asked about Allah’s istiwa: "Istiwa is known, the 'how' of it is unknown, belief in it is obligatory, and asking about it is an innovation." This response implies that istiwa is affirmed, but without speculating about how it happens or attributing physical qualities to Allah. 3. Logical and Rational Arguments The scholars also rely on logical arguments that emphasize the impossibility of Allah being physically confined to a place or direction, since these are attributes of creation: Allah's non-resemblance to creation: Movement, rising, or being confined to a place are attributes of physical bodies. Since Allah is not a body (as affirmed by the Quran), He cannot be subject to physical actions like "rising" or "settling" in the way humans understand these concepts. Time and space: Allah existed before time, space, and the Throne itself. Therefore, interpreting "istiwa" as a physical act would contradict the belief that Allah is not bound by the constructs of time and space. 4. Quranic Verses Emphasizing Allah's Majesty and Authority Several other Quranic verses convey similar concepts of Allah's power and authority, often using metaphorical language to express His control over creation: "To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and He has power over all things." (Quran 3:189) This highlights that Allah's authority is absolute, and His "rising over the Throne" is understood in the context of His complete control over the universe, rather than a literal act of rising. "He regulates all affairs from the heavens to the earth." (Quran 32:5) This verse suggests that Allah governs the affairs of the universe without needing to be physically present in a particular location, further supporting the idea that istiwa is about authority, not physical movement. 5. Consensus of Mainstream Islamic Scholars The consensus (Ijma') of many scholars is that Allah’s istiwa is an affirmation of His authority and exaltedness in status, rather than a literal elevation or sitting on the Throne. Scholars like Ibn Kathir, Al-Bayhaqi, and Al-Ghazali have emphasized that such descriptions of Allah in the Quran should be understood in a manner befitting His majesty, and without likening Him to His creation.
@rousellmende5816Ай бұрын
Contradictions of the video 2:22 It is really silly to think that Allah even exists when the Quran has such an inaccurate vision, how something can exist before time and space when it is material, and not immaterial, what it refers to when it says that it is anthropomorphic is because it really It is, because how can something material exist when time and space did not yet exist? 3:12 I really think you did not see the debate there, nuances are made about the foot or the other parts of Allah being different from those of the human: but that does not mean that they are also material, making this impossible. This only confirms that the quran is full of contradictions about the inner workings of its god, eliminating any doubt that Allah does not exist, and that, therefore, Jesus is the truth, the way and the life, and no one goes to the father if he is not for him
@Jawad-p1xАй бұрын
No one said Allah is material, you're not even trying to understand our aqeedah. That's not antropomorphism, as we don't try to explain the modality of His attributes (There is nothing like Him 42:11). His attributes don't need to be material for them to be distinct from each other in their intrinsic reality. Conclusion, not a contradiction, you don't know anything about how our aqeedah or philosophical theology works.
@rousellmende5816Ай бұрын
@@Jawad-p1x The problem is that the Quran, unlike the Bible, does not use logical inference, therefore, if it says so in the Quran it is because it literally is, so literally, it has those attributes described materially.
@Jawad-p1xАй бұрын
@@rousellmende5816 Sure, bring the verse that says Allah's attributes are material. Because I'm sure you're smart enough to know you can't take literally something that is not even stated.
@muhtasimmahin5057Ай бұрын
That's why I don't follow those individuals anymore who use philosophy in Islamic dawah or debate. I wouldn't mention their name for they are still my muslim brother. May Allah guide them to Islam according to Quran and Sunnah.
@kinetic3971Ай бұрын
It's funny you should say that I just watched a video from blogging theology getting in depth to this very subject. Personally don't think there is anything wrong with it as long as it doesn't go against the Quran and sunnah. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mqnCmqONhK2Dm5o&ab_channel=BloggingTheology
@letsunnahgoforthАй бұрын
The attributes of Allah shouldn't be understood in the same metaphysical and ontological context of our reality. Allah has hands feet shin but they aren't like ours and shouldn't be understood in the same physical frameworks of our reality Allah transcends all frameworks of reality and isn't limited by the space time continium so his hands face e.t.c shouldn't be understood in that sense.
@mzin536Ай бұрын
agree
@rukiyes3437Ай бұрын
This makes so much sense.
@sullyrajaАй бұрын
Then why didn't any of your Salafis on the panel or in this video answer the question the Christian posed? Why did they not address his point about Allah having to occupy space? I had this debate with a Salafi a few days ago when he stated Allah has hands but they are not like ours. Ok so what are they like if not ours I asked? He replied he does not know. So if Allah is using something we know (human hand) to describe something we don't know then that is a METAPHOR. It does not mean Allah literally has hands as hands must be attached to something - to have hands is to have arms. To have arms is to have reach. To have reach is to have limits. To say Allah has limits is kufr. This has been debunked many times over by the true ulema not the najdi funded extremist whose beliefs are aligned with those of the Christians and the Jews - they too ascribe human attributes to their gods.
@mzin536Ай бұрын
@@sullyraja the answer is simple Allah doesnt occupy space Allah has attributes and they are not like ours its that simple . He already responded saying Allah's hands are not like ours . I do not completly disagree with metaphors i think they can be true , but anyways that does not matter because any of that doesnt contradict the onness of Allah .
@sullyrajaАй бұрын
@@mzin536 Correct. Allah does not occupy space. 1) Salafis say that Allah has physical form such as hands but His hands are not like ours. The definition of a metaphor is a way of describing something by saying it is something else. If we have hands and Allah is referring to something that is not like our understanding of a hand then it is clearly a metaphor. 2) If Allah had physical attributes He would NEED space in which to exist and Allah does not need anything. Allah is never dependent. By employing common sense in conjunction with these two axioms we can infer Allah does not have physical form and anyone who says He does is outside of the fold of Islam.
@ahmedandalous2878Ай бұрын
"Allah is sufficient for me. There is no god [worhty of worship] except Him. In Him I put my trust. And He is the Lord of the Mighty Throne." - Qur'ān (9:129)
@user-ke1dq8in2tАй бұрын
THAT IS WRONG Allah most high does not have 2 eyes like humans. It it talking about dajjal is blind in the right eye means dajjal does not have internal sight and can see with the left eye meaning he has only external sight and is internally spiritually blind but Allah is not. IT IS TO BE INTREPETED. You speak without knowledge just following Tafsir and now you want to label Muslims who reject your view as this as Khafir you should be ashamed.
@sheikhshakilakhtar1865Ай бұрын
Where on earth did he say that the Eyes of Allaah are like human eyes? Did we watch the same video?
@user-ke1dq8in2tАй бұрын
@@sheikhshakilakhtar1865 he holds the view that dajjal will be blind in one eye physically. This Hadith needs interpretation as many things connected with dajjal and the endtimes. This Hadith is not talking about external eyes. A believer can read kafir wether literate or illiterate because he is seeing with the internal sight/right eye also known as baseera
@justice70567Ай бұрын
@@sheikhshakilakhtar1865 The Hadith didnt say "2 eyes" He arbitrarily interpreted it as "2 eyes". Because humans also have 2 eyes.
@Jannah_Is_For_Al-GhurabaaАй бұрын
no, dont lie, its got to do with the Arabic language
@ttenf3ct1ons86Ай бұрын
According to the Hanbali/salafi creed yes Allah has hands, even metaphorical still needs to provide why 2 hands are metaphorical
@Jawad-p1xАй бұрын
Assalamu aleykum, hanbali is a madhab, salafi a manhaj. I think you meant athari (which is the creed that takes every attributes of Allah literally)
@anees_burkiАй бұрын
syfe, your talking points on philosophy is so cringe, you yourself (and brother Muhammad ali) use philosophy, and then say also "it's wrong to use philosophy, we should only say what we believe"? how does your brain makes sense of this rhetorical nonsense? Please explain
@biggestboss7911Ай бұрын
That's like saying because you don't believe the bible that you can't use it against someone who does. These arguments by Christian are philosophical ones, not Christian or religious ones, so he's obviously going to use philosophical retorts against them. You wouldn't use religious scripture to prove why God exists to an atheist would you?
@anees_burkiАй бұрын
@@biggestboss7911 Then why is he calling out those who use it in dawah? And that's what i'm referring to, he should consistent and call himself out too for using philosophy against other religions or as you said atheism
@JC-o8qАй бұрын
@@biggestboss7911- It's more like condemning people for quoting the Bible, and then quoting the Bible.