You are probably the best tutor ( in organic mechanisms) I have ever come across in You Tube. Please keep up the good work.
@lucastavares58722 жыл бұрын
This is great. Just a note that H3O+ might be too strong of an acid in these cases, our professor recommends H4NCl.
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
Pentavalent carbon? That's a sin! I think there are quite a few errors in this mechanism, most evidence points to a grignard reagent being polar covalent rather than ionic, not to mention the carbon with four bonds plus an electron, that ought to be a physical impossibility, carbon being one of the only elements that strictly follows the octet rule.
@nickt25758 жыл бұрын
+Professor Dave Explains beef
@steveharold87968 жыл бұрын
few odd mistake fair enough dt we all make some from what ur video havent quite made the cut..appreciate rather than bringing someones effort down
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
+Steve Harold i'm not trying to bring anyone down, those of us that put out educational videos have a responsibility to make sure they are of the utmost accuracy. if there are errors, they should be pointed out so that misinformation isn't propagated.
@steveharold87968 жыл бұрын
+Professor Dave Explains sorry for being defensive
@coreyisgur7378 жыл бұрын
I'm sure that you know a whole lot more about organic chemistry than I do but I'm not really seeing your point. My understanding is that a covalent bond, though I'm a little nervous to present a maxim, is only formed between two nonmetal atoms. So, wouldn't that mean that the carbanion's interaction with the Mg would be ionic? Further more, wouldn't that make sense due to the fact that we are talking about ionic interactions? Again, not saying that you are wrong, but the way that this video explains the interactions between magnesium and carbon seems solid. Also, where are you seeing a pentavalent carbon? The only place that I was able to find one was during, what I assume to be, a concerted mechanism in which the Mg donates a single electron to the carbon and the carbon-halogen bond is removed. I am truly curious so please let me know, thanks.
@afnan-gi2nj5 жыл бұрын
أنت عظيم بجد! 👏💜
@Virtu3Ly11 жыл бұрын
You're my hero!!!!!! You explain this a million times better than my professor. Thank you!!!!
@rounaksahu37169 жыл бұрын
very very impressive.. Thank u Guys u r making studies so much comfortable
@jackyd437511 жыл бұрын
or you can pause the video do the rxn and watch if you did the steps right. :)
@decsjr10 жыл бұрын
This was great, thanks!
@musiqal33311 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. I like. Although yes, I feel you do speak quickly, I followed along!~
@simahakimi494210 жыл бұрын
Perfect! Thank you!!
@XvidGamingPC-HD10 жыл бұрын
Thank you, that's really helpful, I really appreciate it.
@fazalrahman53278 жыл бұрын
yes right
@imbored19311 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation! Thanks so much! Had to replay it a few times, spoke a little too fast for me lol
@Baidyabati11 жыл бұрын
Wow that is just superb !!!
@mseve427110 жыл бұрын
You're a Lifesaver!!!!!!!!!! Thank you!
@ranamohamed94972 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@isachinq11 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Very useful...
@rickykay202410 жыл бұрын
Thx so much !!!!!!!!!!! U r the best!
@NATI32189 жыл бұрын
On the example with the formaldehyde, you attacked the carbonyl using the ncarba nion but should there be an arrow showing the MgBr leaving?
@danthedan210 жыл бұрын
Why is it for the second example that the methyl group went away?
@eliacalderon957110 жыл бұрын
I just paused the video and am thinking the same thing...because once the methyl group is added it will no longer be a secondary, but a tertiary alcohol...
@saviour17510 жыл бұрын
The methyl group was still there and it is a secondary alcohol since the alcohol group was attached to a carbon which is bonded to two other C atom.
@benbrak37137 жыл бұрын
same question in my mind right now
@rubin8319 жыл бұрын
Genius!!!!
@kinpatchifox9 жыл бұрын
The type of connection between CM and the type of connection between Mg-X ??
@darraghh63847 жыл бұрын
this was a quick and dirty explanation of the mechanism. nice.
@ladybug22bulldogs11 жыл бұрын
Nice bro!!!
@p-vashmalik11158 жыл бұрын
sir kindly plz clear the 18 rule for organomettlic compounds ...
@Raisuru10 жыл бұрын
quick question, what are the differences between the half-headed curly arrows and the normal curly arrows?
@SubliminalSixtyFive10 жыл бұрын
The half-headed arrow illustrates one electron being moved and the full headed arrow shows two electrons being moved
@Raisuru10 жыл бұрын
SubliminalSixtyFive Thank you
@ccrunnerx92x11 жыл бұрын
Is the Grignard reaction a nucleophilic substitution or addition?
@Pepci269 жыл бұрын
Hey what about chirality for the aldehyde to secondary alcohol example? I am struggling with chirality and would appreciate some guidance. Does anyone know of a good video explaining chirality in grignard reations?
@pamelageorge34876 жыл бұрын
wait why does only one electron from the Mg attack the methyl halide? why not the pair of electrons
@Winniethepoohx0007 жыл бұрын
Thank you SO much! I have the worst professor ever ):
@passntesam3346 Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤
@salmankazi53089 жыл бұрын
Could any one tell whats is " E+20 " above the arrow...??