T28 or T95

[@jmpmp_505]

The girls und panzer scene with the T28 shedding its outer tracks like a lizard’s tail

[@dylanlevy-iw4cz]

😂

[@For_swite]

Def couldn't happen but it would be cool if it did

[@caterpillarrex4932]

@@For_swite it can The outer tracks could be detached within two hours

[@publichearing8536]

​​@@caterpillarrex4932driving around the obstacle: 5 minutes Transformers flex: 120 minutes "Yeah no sarge, we're gonna do the thing" _transformers! Panzers in disguise..._

[@V3lk0n]

​@@caterpillarrex4932 did they do it for better mobility or for better transport? Or maybe both or maybe something else?

[@Konrad-i7r]

The only correct name is ''tutel''

[@troskygames8798]

Incorrect its "doom tutel"

[@Armada-1935]

Tutel

[@LeoGledhill]

Tutel

[@rileywatson1118]

Nah that's the British tortoise but it's also a super heavy tank and like the t28 it only had a couple models made because it was real slow but yet had a very strong gun and very heavy armour and could out armour and out gun a panther and sometimes even a tiger

[@Fresh_oil591]

🐢

[@aziqasri5435]

No one's gonna talk about the fact this tank disappeared for 30 years, and people find it at US Army Fort?

[@ussenterprisecv6805]

Or the fact that if I recall correctly it wasn't even hidden. It was just on the other side of some bushes or something and somehow remained unaccounted for for far too long.

[@aziqasri5435]

@ussenterprisecv6805 I really should have said 'disappeared' when I was commenting. Thanks for clarifying that.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Simple answer... B U S H

[@Hpa513]

​@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss Average premium player:

[@SmileyGbox]

Hide and seek champion for 30 years

[@Lt_1914]

ASU T28 scene was fun to watch in Der film

[@inkycat7167]

Hello LT 😂

[@erikbarvikhansen267]

The T28 was made to breakthrough enemies lines since big gun and thick armor

[@istvantoth3775]

No shit Sherlock

[@erikbarvikhansen267]

@istvantoth3775 i aint no Sherlock im a Viking

[@publichearing8536]

​@@erikbarvikhansen267No shit viking

[@dfnxINC]

​@@erikbarvikhansen267 Hell yeah

[@JazzKazoo0930]

Specifically the siegfried line, but by the time it was ready they'd already found another way and gotten through

[@TyeriuI]

''another guy came''😭🙏

[@HeavyMachineGunner]

And that other guy was a girl

[@L.A.G._official]

HE CAME😭😭😭

[@HeavyMachineGunner]

@ relatable

[@HeavyMachineGunner]

@@L.A.G._official lolicon makes me do that

[@TerBlitzReal]

Still, both designations are correct, because it had both names at some point, so T95 is not incorrect, it is just less correct. Indeed, it does not fit into the GMC section, but still, calling it T95 is correct.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

True, and I use the word "incorrect" very lightly here. Its all more of a "yes but actually no" situation as the T95 designation is based off a false assumption.

[@felipeball7778]

For Video Games purposes the single tracked one became T28 while the double is T95

[@lucythefrogge]

Same with Polikarpov U-2, which was redesignated Po-2 in 1944

[@TankerTyphlosion666]

Such blasphemy, the only proper name is 2-OP

[@lucythefrogge]

@TankerTyphlosion666 2-OP/2-U

[@noraneko8926]

Gun Motor Carriage was a designation for a Tank Destroyer in the US Army. However in the US, tanks like M3 GMC, M10 GMC, M18, and M36 were lightly armored, while T95 armor was thicc af. That's why it had its own designation as T28 Super Heavy tank.

[@icy3-1]

Literally the largest and heaviest GMC that's ever lived. That's also a hide and seek champion.

[@Kalashnikov413]

Actually the first T28 designation was "Heavy Tank". They redesignated it into "Super Heavy Tank" because of the presence of M26 Pershing and other heavy tank prototypes

[@qwas_1234_]

It was named t-28 then t-95 and then t28 super heavy all within 3 years which is crazy! 😅

[@AlienInTheTV]

The Girls Und Panzer is crazy, love it

[@ratchaneethawinkrua2308]

Girl und panzer is really fun to watch

[@danael0089]

Furry >>

[@KardioIzletmetovic]

To me the one with additional tracks will always be the T95 and the one without will always be the T28

[@USS-Prinz_Eugen]

This is a great analysis, and you have such a lovely voice!

[@mstrbomber6942]

It was first designed as just a Heavy Tank, the army then changed how they designated vehicles which is why it was classified as a GMC for a bit, after changing their system again is when it was given the title of Super Heavy Tank.

[@maplearrow1842]

Like others said, that thing’s real name is actually Tutel. The British Tortoise isn’t called Tutel, but Tortos. Source: Dollarplays

[@SnakeyesYT]

I love that the T28 in the anime just dropped its outer tracks. Like bro, it took 2 hours to detach them for transport 😂

[@MyPlant678]

When I heard “T95” I thought of the Russian “T95” prototype named Objekt-195 which was replaced by the T-14 Armata

[@evilnigga68]

wasn't replaced it was developed into the t-14

[@Person1940s]

Wasn’t it designed as an assault tank?Like the British tortoise which was meant to smash through German/Italian fortifications?

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Assault Tank in US doctrine is different to British doctrine. Assault tanks in US doctrine are, to put it bluntly, Heavy tanks with the armament of a Medium tank And in British Doctrine, a Tank meant to destroy Enemy emplacements.

[@Person1940s]

@ U.S. doctrine states,An assault tank would be used to support friendly infantry if I am correct.This means destroying enemy fortifications would be partially needed,if not the most needed.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

@Person1940s I think you're confusing that with Assault"GUN" like the M4 (105) Assault Tanks, according to the US, are the T14 and M4A3E2. Assault Guns are meant to destroy fortifications via direct fire Of course the British Tortoise and T28 are meant to fill the exact same role, and were expected to destroy German fortifications, it doesn't mean they have to be designated the same Its a "well yes but actually no" situation

[@Insatiable-saucy]

Bro got angry at the end 💀

[@Bogdanovici-real]

Absolute Cinema ✋😐🤚

[@pirig-gal]

The correct one is the last one they changed it to.

[@Жнец-ь1ы]

let's rotate the whole planet to get enemies near us

[@Theoneandonlyfridgedj]

Me with the t28 premium in war thunder with the front completely bushed up: “I have become god. Destroyer of oblivious German players”

[@cloakface-sv5sm]

T28’s classification “Super Heavy Tanks” abbreviates to SHT, which is exactly why American army was afraid of using it

[@kyizelma]

bro they had even worse names than SHT. also they wouldnt call super heavys shts just whatever name, gmc is just for tank destroyer

[@PsydenIII]

The T28/T95 didn't fit the definition of a 'Tank', as the US Army defined it. It was closer in purpose to a Gun Motor Carriage, as it was designed to carry a gun to attack fortifications to breach the Siegfried Line. The Army saw the Tank as an anti-infantry weapon as part of their rock-paper-scissors scheme, with the Tank Destroyer taking out Tanks and Infantry taking out Tank Destroyers. If the T28/T95 was truly a Tank, it'd have a hull machine gun (1940's US Army logic).

[@Kalashnikov413]

It doesn't fit into the GMC category either

[@PsydenIII]

@@Kalashnikov413 True, which is why there was back and forth in the designations. That's why I said it was closer to a GMC, not one. The T28/T95 was a vehicle designed for a very specific purpose and really existed outside of standard classifications. It's purpose was, in essence, to be an armored carrier to bring the 105mm close to enemy fortifications in order to knock them out. The unarmored 155mm GMC M12 was used in it's stead and found to be quite successful.

[@Kalashnikov413]

@ It wasn't even close to be GMC at all. GMC were vehicles with light armor and fairly mobile, in which the T28 was anything but that. Super Heavy Tank was the proper designation for this vehicle (doesn't matter if it has turret or not)

[@PsydenIII]

@@Kalashnikov413 That is your definition, that was not the definition set forth by the US Army of the time period. The most appropriate definition for the T28/T95 would be that of an Assault Gun, but that was not a term used by the US Army of the time. By US Army doctrine and naming convention of the time, the T28 was NOT a tank. It did not fit the form or purpose of a tank, so it was not a tank. It is /close/ to a GMC, but, as I have already said multiple times, it was not a GMC, either. It was a heavily armored self-propelled gun carriage meant for directly attacking the Siegfried Line's Strong Points, in order to force a breach and allow other units to advance. I guess you could call it a specialist vehicle.

[@Kalashnikov413]

@@PsydenIII actually THAT is the definition set by the US Army of that period, that's why M18 Hellcat exist

[@A_Stormworks_gamer7269]

I did not know they were the same vehicle

[@Mechfan666]

The tank doesnt have a turret, which a form purist would say makes it not a tank. It was intended as an assault gun, essentially, meant to breach heavy fortifications. A slow tracked vehicle without a turret, designed to destroy fortifications and support assaults sounds a lot like something that should be called a gun motor carriage, since we called basically anything that wasnt a "tank" a GMC. Though i dont think we called the 105 Sherman a GMC, and that was also an assault gun. (But we did call the Stuart howitzer refits HMCs) Inconsistency is kind of normal when it comes to designations, so I can see where/why a massive organization like the US military couldn't decide what the vehicle should be called.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

The thing is, having an extremely armored vehicle does not fit into the GMC doctrine. GMCs are meant to be as lightly armored as possible in order to get from one place to another as quickly as possible. They're also not meant to be Frontline vehicles (Yes, they could be used as frontline vehicles, but with the amount of armor they had, it was I'll advised) The T28 is meant to be a Frontline vehicle, unlike GMCs. Not to mention it wouldve been the slowest vehicle on the Battlefield so it would be a Horrible GMC. ---------------------- Assault Guns Assault guns, basically do the job of some GMCs and HMCs, but they are meant for Frontline combat. Thus, being more armored than your average GMC/HMC One example is the M4 (105) Medium. The US during WW2 never formally have an Assault Gun designation, so it was usually based on the Tank or Tank Variant (In 1945 when US was undergoing a switch in how they designed things like the M45, but all tanks, including the T28, kept their designations) So going off of how the US designated tanks T28 Super Heavy, is perfectly fine. ------------- Does a Tank Need a Turret in order to be classified as a Tank? Short answer: No Long answer: The Swedish Strv 103 is known for having a Fixed turret, however it's still designated as being a Main Battle Tank dispite most Tanks at the time having a fully rotating Turret.

[@ItsumiRoyalPanzer]

Wow i actually really enjoyed this video, congratulations you just got a new subscriber

[@Theover4000]

I once had a talk with a guy in a discord server who was convinced they were two different tanks. I pulled and cited sources and showed diagrams but at the end he went “well that’s your opinion”. I really need to stop using my time on stupid 😅

[@Alisaherhusband]

But if we replaced the 105 mm with a 75 or a 37 mm it would be an assault tank

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Probably

[@BVStar-hn9us]

I thought you were gonna say “your mom” after “do you know what it does fit into?” 😂😂😂

[@dakotacarpenter8114]

In all reality, it's a form of assault gun which is the same thing as a stug Which was made to blow away fortifications and concealed enemies same thing as the t 95

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

However Assault Guns don't always = GMC. The M4 (105) is an Assault gun, but it wasn't considered to be a GMC as 1. It was too heavily armoured to be a GMC 2. It was expected to take fire, (something GMCs weren't designed to do) The T28 is the exact same thing 1. It's too heavy to be a GMC 2. It was expected to take fire

[@Dumbingz]

Wait can the external tracks disconnect?! HAH?!

[@Kalashnikov413]

Yeah, for transportation purpose

[@tristsnreynold333]

I know exactly what he meant when he said GMC, but I had a brain fart and started thinking general motors and not gun motor carrier lol

[@oliverfreitas8593]

Me wondering why bro is talking about a 1920's tank whit a post ww2 heavy tank: 👁️👄👁️

[@kubosz2412]

You must be thinking about the soviet one from 1932. this videos about the american one which only had two prototypes. they just have the same designations(which can be confusing lol). It comes down to the fact that prototype vehicles in the US had the letter T before the numbers(for example the first m24 chaffees were designated as the T24, the pershing was a T26, etc).

[@dn2064]

Lmao, my favorite 100ton GUN MOTOR CARRIAGE

[@ethanmelton927]

With the same engine as THE SERMANS

[@masonhughesofficialchannel8808]

Absolute goat for using girl und panzer

[@andyboi8399]

This is all very interesting, but pardon my lack of knowledge when I ask if you could tell me what a GMC and the adjacent doctrine entails, I could not find any info about the term online.

[@ghaythskyline6827]

GMC, Gun Motor Carriage. Means exactly what it says 😅

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Good question. GMCs or Gun Motor Carriages, are meant to be mobile gun emplacements A GMC can range from a Jeep with a 37mm (M6 GMC) all the way to something resembling a Tank (M10, M36, etc...) GMCs can fill the role of either Tank destroyers, Field Artillery or SPAA The GMC doctrine was for GMCs to be Fast and as lightly armored as posible, as they were either used like a quick response force, or not on the front lines So "if" the T28 would to be considered the role of a GMC, it would've been damned too slow to perform as one. HMCs or Howitzer Motor Carriages are exactly the same as GMCs in terms of requirements, but instead of a Anti-Aircraft or Anti-tank guns they're armed with Howitzers. I hope this answers your question

[@andyboi8399]

@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss Thanks for clarifying! I had heard the term 'Gun Motor Carriage' used before, but never I never knew anything about its doctrine or what it actually entailed, y'know more than just the name suggests. Fascinating.

[@clonescope2433]

So GMC in this case does not mean general motors company. It means gun motor carriage. The term kind of popped up with the development of tank destroyers early ones were literally putting six pounders on the back of a Jeep and it was a pretty accurate way to describe their role. It is an anti-tank gun on a motorized carriage because the wheels of a say field gun was called a carriage. Which then solely evolved into the m10 tank destroyer with its 3-in/76 mm gun and later into kind of what the tank destroyer Branch wanted which was the M18 fast light and packing decent firepower for its size. Now the t95 /t28 could be a GMC by technical description. It is a gun on a motorized carriage unlike tanks, which predominantly for the US usually had a turret outside of the m1918 Ford and the Mark 8. So I can understand why a officer probably thought GMC was a more technically apt description than the term of a tank, even if it's a whole category onto its own.

[@rileywatson1118]

Bro they also got such a low profile and must be nightmares in warthunder

[@SirAroace]

it they can get there

[@arockdino8445]

Personally I like to think of the t-95 with both tracks on and a t28 without the tracks on

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Which, and I mean this with the utmost respect, is incorrect. I know Warthunder and WoT have a large influence on how people view tanks, but it doesn't make sense to have two different designations for the same Tank, just because it's in its transport configuration

[@arockdino8445]

@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss I get what you're saying but I think it does as it's a little bit more confusing just to call to t28 with or without the tracks. If you would give one as the label without the tracks in one with it's a lot easier to identify what state it's in

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

@arockdino8445 Its not confusing at all. If you order a T28 it will be shipped in it's Transport Configuration (the Outer tracks will always come with it) When it's fighting, or driving towards the front, it will already have the outer tracks already installed. Its also doesn't make sense to call one a GMC and the Other a Super Heavy tank just because of a pair of tracks. If the US really.. really wanted a designatiin to distinguish between the two, They would've called them T28 and T28E1 However the US just found no need for it. Also how is it confusing to you? Its Just T28. If you need to specify, then say "Without the outer set of tracks" Arguably the using T28 and T95 to distinguish between the two is even more confusing, as a new person who's gaining an interest in Tankery will get confused, as to why the designation drastically changes from Super Heavy to GMC just because of a transport configuration.

[@arockdino8445]

@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss the problem is yes it was originally called the t28 by officials of United States of America. However in current times even if it is incorrect it has been given a second name by media instead of trying to abolish it which will be very much more difficult to do. Why not alter it to just give it the designation for a t95 for when it's fully operational and t28 when it's not. And completely ignore the GMC part of it. Cuz if you ask 90% of people out there that don't have very much information on it you'll never hear them ever call it the GMC 95. Everyone knows it's a super heavy either as a tank destroyer or as an assault gun What my argument is you know how like different countries get like the patent and they call it different things this would be the same thing just getting it in a different time for a different generation

[@ThemightyEnterprise]

Personally, I just call it T95 because it sounds more menacing that T28

[@AmericansElite]

it makes it sound like a russian tank so i disagree. it does make it sound more menacing but still

[@Prime_content]

​@@AmericansElitethe designers didn't want it to have the same name as the t28 Russian tank because the enemy would piss themselves...in laughter🤣. The Russian t28 is such a shit tank

[@dfnxINC]

​@@AmericansElite Wait until you hear about the T34 and the T54

[@ckingc05]

Reminds me of the A-26 getting designated as B-26 and then back to A-26.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

True, but that has to do more with the Air Corp becoming its own branch and changing how designations work (The tried to get rid to the "A"[Attack] role), rather than someone thinking he knew better.

[@Krzaczor34]

Just call it the T98 at this point

[@KV-2Head]

The movie was "Absolute Cinema"

[@Il_Principessa]

It was a breakthrough tank that would be used to break that one defense line the Germans created

[@kubosz2412]

Yeah, the Siegfried line to be precise.

[@Memegod_69]

As a super heavy it would have seriously struggled against heavier armoured, armed and faster Maus and e-100

[@snonsig2688]

Which would have never entered production

[@M0vingSaturn523]

@@snonsig2688 True, but in an alternate reality where these heavy beasts face off, it would struggle to penetrate the Maus and E-100's frontal armor with just a 105mm gun. Flanking would be necessary, but it's as slow as the German tanks. Without air support, the German heavies would likely win due to their larger guns (128mm and 150mm).

[@snonsig2688]

@M0vingSaturn523 the maus "only" has 220mm of frontal turret armour, while the T28 has over 300mm. It would be very unlikely either could do much against the other

[@Memegod_69]

@ fair enough but overall the Maus has more side read and roof armour as well as the front plate being just as strong

[@rafa114-n7]

Bro is this a friggin anime with tanks? I need to watch this rn what is it called

[@Godzilla20191]

Girls und panzer

[@kubosz2412]

The anime is Girls und panzer. It's a rather fictionalised showing of tanks, but it's a fun watch

[@black89308]

Good tank but still a big target for bombers

[@snonsig2688]

Which germany didn't have anymore

[@SuspiciousAnomoly]

Actually (🤓☝️). These designations are both incorrect. The true designation, is in fact “doom turtle”.

[@randomperson798]

“But you know what it does fit into? Your mom”. 😭

[@Cutiepookiefurry]

Hold up in the scene where it went through that tunnel the tracks can't just fall off like that you need to get out and remove them by hand

[@Lucas-u2y1s]

Bro this movie is awsome🔥

[@brute6896]

yeah but T95 is more badass than T28, T28 constantly reminds me of the how shit of a vehicle the T-28 was

[@defender1238]

WoT: both? Yeah both is good

[@EDDSWORLDMEGAFAN]

This is true, but the T95 sounds cooler so im still gonna use it

[@JacksonWard-c6i]

Foe thise who Don't know, the song is called when Johnny comes Marching home

[@RogueGMR]

The Soviets wondering their T-28 is feared in Germany

[@geoika5773]

As I know the difference between these two tanks is tracks, t-28 had 2 when T-95 had 4

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Which is incorrect

[@Kalashnikov413]

Horribly incorrect, in fact

[@maxegloff3001]

the sound reminds me of strike force heroes lol

[@LunarStateGovernment]

Okay but have you considered that 95 is bigger than 28 and therefore better? And also that doesn’t fit my narrative!

[@Kalashnikov413]

Wdym "bigger"?

[@LunarStateGovernment]

@ 95 is a bigger number than 28. It’s a joke

[@soldier_tf2_real]

Hey, i saw you on tik tok

[@_.J._.]

I've always thought that the T28 only had 2 tracks and the T95 had 4

[@snonsig2688]

Nope. How many tracks it has has nothing to do with it

[@NOTACTUALLockheedMartin]

Plus T95 is used later on with the T95 'MBT' variants

[@sonoilprim]

gup anime footage spotted also YUKARI!!!

[@monkepotato3897]

Wasnt the other desighnation because they removed the doube tracks?

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Nope. Both designations refer to the same tank. The fact that it can Take off the outer set of running gear is for Ease of Transportation. It also doesn't make sense to completely change the Classification. If the one with the outer tracks and the one without were meant to have different designations, then it would be T28E1 or, if the guy you're the guy that doesn't understand the GMC doctrine, T95E1 At max they would've been T29/T96 but that's already pushing it

[@raymagbanua9503]

What is song?

[@HHoxx]

when johnny comes marching home - its a civil war song if im not mistaken

[@akitsujimura526]

The Girls und Panzer version to be specific

[@bndhidorahonewhismany6436]

Idk what yall yapping about. THAT is CLEARLY a tutel. Also you’ve just reminded me to rewatch GUP

[@trentthorn5151]

Yes they arw both the same t28 without extra tracks

[@snonsig2688]

Nope. How many tracks it has has nothing to do with it

[@oliverfreitas8593]

My kind when i hear a T class Tank: 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@OwO2620]

I prefer T95 for a simple reason: You can fly a T28, but can't fly a T28, but the T-28 is lighter than the T28

[@Kalashnikov413]

But the T95 is also lighter than T95

[@OwO2620]

@Kalashnikov413 shit :c

[@BraxtonDoesStuff-h2d]

How about the 2 tracked variant and not the 4 tracked?

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Its not a Variant, it's a Configuration. The Outer set of tracks and be removed in order to ease transport

[@Der.Gamer999]

The legendary tutel

[@samandaromonov6307]

can we argue this in war thunder forum?

[@YTPANTSYTSHORTSALT]

Why not just call it the T95 Heavy Tank?

[@V1_ultrakill9]

Cause it's too heavy to be a heavy

[@TheSteam02]

​@@V1_ultrakill9T95 Super Heavy Tank.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Because that's not how US designated vehicles. T28 was the US's 28th tank prototype/program. But once the name changed, they switched it over to the GMC designation and so it became the 95th GMC prototype/program

[@YTPANTSYTSHORTSALT]

@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss Ah, I understand now.

[@bahisulaiman3573]

Screw the t names, its called a TUTEL🥺

[@MoistyMan-i6g]

They are 2 different tanks. T28 was the old version and t95 was newer, and more side armour

[@catgoesmeowmeow5877]

No. Just no. That's what WoT and WT tricks you to think that way

[@Kalashnikov413]

Not even close

[@minchy9094]

Thanks, imma watch girls und panzer again

[@Terraqueo22]

So basically.. T28 is basically is the transport mode for T95?

[@snonsig2688]

No. It's T28 no matter if the outer tracks are attached or not

[@nyx3988]

T95 sound better imo, i will stick with that and Doom tutel/tutel

[@jeremywells9019]

Tanks have turrets bro. Calm down.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Not every tank needs to have a turret. It's based on Doctrine

[@Kalashnikov413]

Swedish S-tank, Mark tank series, St. Chamond, A7V: "So what am i?"

[@George-W-bush-21y]

Oversimplified is never wrong buddy

[@KleeneKrysz]

that aint a GMC Sierra

[@Porta_potty4244]

What show is the anime girl tank thingy

[@Philippines-animations]

Girls und panzer

[@Lohandre]

Just call it tutel bruh 😭🙏

[@frostwolf2175]

Ask any War Thunder player and its name is "oh SHIT!"

[@raulc2015]

Why was the T95 made then if it's the same as T28?

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Its not that they made a new tank designated T95, but rather they redesignated the existing T28 prototype/s

[@guillaumesteiner793]

The musique pls 🙏

[@bobabb67]

for every german tank there are 5 american tanks; numbers win, thats all.

[@michalsniadala1667]

nah its the DOOM TURTLE

[@NuclearBomb-ow4zf]

Imagine the T28 in ww1 😂

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Funnily enough, it probably be faster and more reliable than most of them

[@Berserk_Dude]

Wait i thought bro was gonna say t-28 was wrong because that one russian tank

[@AviationGuy-k3e]

Why don't they just name it T28/T95 SHGMC

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Because SHGMC wasn't, and isn't a designation

[@Red_Nuff]

What is that animation called

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

Girls und Panzer

[@Red_Nuff]

@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss is it with a watch

[@bonline.]

Song?

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

When Johnny Comes Marching Home (Girls und Panzer)

[@bonline.]

@ there is no way it’s from girls und panzer but thanks

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

@@bonline. This version is

[@AlphaJnx]

T28 T95 and yaddda yadda. We all know the correct name is TUTEL

[@conductorkarsen2119]

Do you know why it was built.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

To deal with the Siegfried line and be able to withstand hits by most German AT guns.

[@conductorkarsen2119]

Until the grunts got bored of waiting and drove over the dragon teeth

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

@@conductorkarsen2119 ye