Tale of Two Prebuys

[@MayhemCanuck]

It still fascinates me how someone can knowingly pick a highly reputable shop like yourselves to manage a pre-buy, knowing they are the best and make recommendations yet not listen to a word of what you said.

[@jjchouinard2327]

Remind me, how do I participate live with these videos?

[@pilotashley620]

Doesn’t Savvy perform a remote logbook review for the buyer as a first phase of their service? Why weren’t the ECI cylinders discovered in the documents audit?

[@venutoa]

Thata good question. Mike can u answer this please. I am Considering your svcs

[@tomiasthexder7673]

Buyers version of “get there itis” is “must buy now itis”

[@alboreland5949]

That IA who pencil whipped the illegal cylinders needs to be reported to the FAA

[@not_listening2792]

They might have not be un-airworthy when the annual was signed off. Just read the AD. The cylinders need to be removed after 1000 hours in service. If they had 999 hours in service the day of the Annual, they are airworthy. The next day is the pilots responsibility for airworthiness. The mechanic SHOULD have disclosed the cylinders would have to be replaced at 1000 hours if that was so, if they were over 1000 hours, a certificate action could be brought by the FAA against the IA.

[@FlyingNDriving]

I have a prebuy in my logbook

[@texastyrannyresponseteam794]

you can't fix stupid.. burt got exactly what he had coming.. and for brokers and sellers that are willing to play games with someone's life... they deserve to have a visitor stop by and "discuss" the situation.. in that case, sounds like some unlawful things happened.. overlooking the cylinders thn signing off on the annual.. sounds criminal.. maybe if you successfully prosecute a few a&ps, brokers, and owners.. then hit them with treble damages, etc.. i have to believe there is recours in a situation like this one.. fraud.. conspiracy.. etc.. too many situations like these.. too many unsafe aircraft flying.