You guys need to push for Garmin. To install microphones I. All systems and start mapping aircraft noise. For any possible hint of issues and this would be great for multi engines if say the left engine heard a thud they would automatically be detected as an anomaly and a report as such.. or maybe the landing gear is malfunctioning and it's creating a funky noise or no noise... In any case it's a great idea and needs to be done.... Asap...
@galenmiller2843Күн бұрын
Wentworth Aircraft Inc is another great source for parts.
@didja6912 күн бұрын
great discussion with regard to the whys. I'm still stuck on trying to figure out the how that is very quickly discussed in the final two minutes after listening for the first 50 minutes discussing why the great reveal is gonna be so great!!! Doing "the great pull". I am assuming you mean pull until the engine starts to run rough and then increase the mixture to allow smooth engine ops. Do you keep adding mixture until CHTs reach a certain value (380F, 400F, etc)? Once you pull the mixture through the "forbidden range" so to say, what are you then adjusting to in a NA fixed pitch aircraft? thanks Always love hearing these videos but sometimes it seems that the important stuff is just ran over real quick!!!
@SUP33RMARIO2 күн бұрын
when is the best time to scope cylinders? cold or warm after running?
@richardturner62783 күн бұрын
Yet another example of the absolute absurdity the FAA. Owner produced parts. 1st rule should state that liability is 100% on the owner and not the a&p. What we are facing is hundreds of old airplanes flying around in the near future with lots of unsafe parts. Its inevitable as these older airplanes become near impossible to service legally. The experimental side has a huge advantage in this respect. I see the market falling completely out the bottom on most of the old trainers for this very reason. The days of 50 thousand dollar 152s are nearing the end.
@bigdaddie404 күн бұрын
I had the same problem years ago with my C-310H. I found a shop in San Jose, CA that was an FAA approved repair station that did gear replating for airliners. I think it cost me like $500 for both struts, BUT that was 30 years ago.
@texastyrannyresponseteam7944 күн бұрын
you can't fix stupid.. burt got exactly what he had coming.. and for brokers and sellers that are willing to play games with someone's life... they deserve to have a visitor stop by and "discuss" the situation.. in that case, sounds like some unlawful things happened.. overlooking the cylinders thn signing off on the annual.. sounds criminal.. maybe if you successfully prosecute a few a&ps, brokers, and owners.. then hit them with treble damages, etc.. i have to believe there is recours in a situation like this one.. fraud.. conspiracy.. etc.. too many situations like these.. too many unsafe aircraft flying.
@amtpdb16 күн бұрын
I am an a&p for 20 years with little to no work experience. I have a few questions I hope you will answer. 1. What type of paperwork did you have to do on the electronics connector you did? 2. On the wing access for the piper structs there are no dimension listed. The AD does not list or connection attachments. How can you make this and what paperwork is needed? 3. If the part is available, can you copy the part and install the copied part? (The Cessna bottom struct added parts on the floor cost at 8,000 and are only 8 parts plus rivets and bolts)What paperwork would be needed? 4. As I understand if you install a owner made part on a plane it cannot be rented out. What if it cannot be found at any price? 5. If a plane lands without the gear, can I make the skins and ribs , former , ect. or do I have to buy them if available? Alot of this was not covered very deeply in school. 5. What would it cost to have a engineer draw up something like an access door and do what ever paperwork needed by the FAA? (What paperwork would be needed?). What log book entries would be needed? Sorry I brought all this up here, but you can see that on the webinar I most likely not get one question answered. Thanks for the Webinar and any answers you have for me. Have a nice week.
@joejody78146 күн бұрын
What a boat load of information. I believe most general aviation pilots are oblivious to any of this detailed information. I once a stearman and the POH was even counter to Continental's start up procedure. I think all of this misinformation centered around the US Army Air Corps need to put pilots in aircraft before they grew long grey beards and fathered a dozen off spring. This level of mechanics back then was unheard of. We needed pilots converted from farm boys, not from physicists.
@onedsc17 күн бұрын
GA is effectively dead for anybody that wants to do it for fun and doesn't own an airplane. I was considering getting my PPL, but this is depressing.
@jaredharder33756 күн бұрын
If you rent then the mx isn't your responsibility. Can rent for a long time before you have "bought" an airplane.
@likes2fly8 күн бұрын
I would like to see the data for when the engineers tested the engines to failures. that graph would be the most useful and accurate. The larger number of engines tested the better the data. Great video and love all your videos.
@jmizzonini9 күн бұрын
It’s sad really. A new off the line C172 in the 70s would be like $85k in today’s dollars. I wish there were more affordable modern options. GA will die out eventually imo. It’ll be the domain of zero to ATP training pilots and ultra wealthy old men. Maybe it’s all by design
@JK-rv9tp9 күн бұрын
Canada has a category called "Owner Maintenance". You can put your plane into that category and the owner can sign off all maint and overhauls (he only has to be a pilot) and use uncertified parts. Major serialized components must be Xed out on their data plates. The list of eligible aircraft is quite large. The guy with the Corvette powered SeaBee put it in OM to do so. The biggest downside, other than it being very difficult to go back, is Transport Canada couldn't get the FAA to recognize the category. So you can't even overfly US territory in your OM airplane, let alone enter the us via customs. Perhaps FAA will look at a similar category based on canadian data in future.
@samcyphers10 күн бұрын
This is brutal to listen to. The simplest of concepts dragged through elaborate explanation. Make the point in as few syllables as possible and get on to the next. The information is good but it takes way too long to get there.
@pharmakon611 күн бұрын
Legacy Part 91 operations for standard GA planes 30+ years old should fall under the same repair rules as Experimentals, full stop. You can load an Experimental with 6-people, file IFR, and land at the Class Bravo with nary a certified part on it. The hamstringing of Legacy GA is absurd.
@SoloRenegade10 күн бұрын
agreed, that's a smart idea with the 30+yr rule on certified planes.
@williambeatty778111 күн бұрын
I would have taken the strut to an auto shop and had chromed and put it together myself. So many aviation prices are just ridiculous. If an issue won’t cause a safety of flight problem just fix it ! Also, if you have an A&P that wants bankrupt you find a different mechanic.
@TheReadBaron917 күн бұрын
On the flip side, many owners want A&Ps to take on liability and hard work for pennys.
@Brian_C_12 күн бұрын
Does anyone fly for fun anymore? I got back into aviation a year ago after not flying for 10 years, and it’s really hard to find a place that’s not marketing rentals exclusively towards the 141/ATP path. Prices are too high, the airplanes are junk, and the CFIs/owners are kinda jerks toward people who just want to rent an airplane to fly occasionally for fun. I like Mikes’s presentations; but the state of GA is depressing these days.
@jmizzonini9 күн бұрын
Wondering the same
@johnopalko522312 күн бұрын
Love DigiKey. They're my go-to parts supplier. You may have had better luck soldering if you'd used solder paste and a heat gun.
@1964Mooney12 күн бұрын
Any used part "should" come with the "N" number of the airplane it came off of. I think this is actually in the regs IIRC This suffices for "traceability" per the regs. Also each part should have a Part Number attached somewhere on it.
@whoanelly737-812 күн бұрын
Solved this problem. LSA. Light Sport Repairman. 👋🏻
@marklindsey199512 күн бұрын
You would think somebody would get into the reproduction wing spar business.
@dbkonkle12 күн бұрын
It was a sad day when I learned Garmin stopped supporting the 495/496/696 series. Those units are better in many ways than the newer units that replaced them. I bought several 495 marine units off eBay for use on my motorcycle long after garmin discontinued them.
@engineerinhickorystripehat12 күн бұрын
I know exactly which stoplight switch that is . Sold a bunch , but to a car collector
@lisaleedavidson12 күн бұрын
On the strut, NH hydraulics in Manchester NH and Dynachrome in MA can refurbish then it has to be inspected by IA for serviceability. These companies specialize in hydraulic cylinder repair/re-chroming. Not an FAA repair station so has to be inspected for use by an IA under the new replacement parts rule.
@utah20gflyer7612 күн бұрын
I think Mike was overstating the precision required for an aircraft strut versus a hydraulic cylinder for a piece of heavy equipment. I’m confident any good cylinder shop could do the work adequately and it would last for decades. Making the case to a reasonable IA would not be difficult. It’s chrome applied to a steel shaft that needs to be a certain diameter +/- a margin. It’s not the space shuttle.
@vedymin112 күн бұрын
All these ancient pos airframes that should have been put in a museum a long time ago...its for the most part a 1940's tech, flying behind these tractor engines is nightmarish. Experimentals and ultralights might be the only affordable way to keep ga going at this rate ?
@utah20gflyer7612 күн бұрын
I’d take my 1968 Mooney over 95%+ of experimentals or ultralights. Certified planes generally are better designed and thought out and over all offer better utility and cost less than a comparable experimental plane. Ultralights are worthless for going anywhere. There are certainly certified planes Id stay away from such as really old twins but there are lots of great certified GA airplanes that are reasonable to own and operate.
@quentagonthornton4912 күн бұрын
The airframe isn't really the biggest issue and it's not as if the majority of experimental aircraft use a more modern construction such as composite. Also, the technology isn't 1940s, but 1930s. If general aviation aircraft made use of the technologies developed during World War II, they would be far more advanced. Liquid cooled engines, automatic variable ignition timing, direct cylinder fuel injection, and automatic prop pitch and mixture (one lever control) would be widespread if that was the case. Many, if not most experimentals use the same antiquated engines as certified aircraft, and the prevalence of more advanced engines is far lower than what it should be. Everything about certified aircraft is overpriced, so you're right that experimentals and ultralights are the only affordable option.
@diveforknowledge12 күн бұрын
Need to get the FAA out of the way of technological advancement. Costs a Bajillion dollars to get a new engine certified even if it's technology that has been proven for 25 years in auto engines.
@SoloRenegade12 күн бұрын
@@diveforknowledge 25yrs?! Fuel injection, FADEC, single lever control, autopilot, and more have been around as early as WW2, over 80yrs ago! The stuff the FAA doesn't allow is older than most people alive today!
@venutoa12 күн бұрын
@@diveforknowledgeyou said it right 100%
@aero308512 күн бұрын
Good content. (I set speed to 1.5X normal).
@user-nx6qr1mt6f12 күн бұрын
Same here.
@P5112 күн бұрын
stellar idea!
@highmarkrich12 күн бұрын
I love Mike's webinars. I always listen at 2X
@larryk13012 күн бұрын
2x and closed captions. The best
@gygw12 күн бұрын
its the only way to make it through
@lowik197312 күн бұрын
Savvy junkie happy to be among first 10 viewers.
@RaceMentally14 күн бұрын
That one with pin bushing coming apart would be an entire rebuild. I’m not allowing an engine with all that engine matter running through an engine fly again. No way in heck am I signing off on that. Rebuild or nothing folks. Why? So I don’t have to do it again for another 1500+ hrs or go somewhere else. Right and once or go throw liability on someone else Then never to use Aeroshell? lol this guy wow
@corydavey302614 күн бұрын
The r and l are reversed based on their location on the engine and it is referenced from the front would be my guess
@richardfelmlee519316 күн бұрын
Interesting thanks. Rich Felmlee
@b.ellison39617 күн бұрын
Thank you Mike, Dave, and Joe! Your borescope initiative is commendable. Quick question though. I first bought the Vividia VA-400 in 2019 on your recommendation. I've not been able to capture the complete crown of a piston on a Lyc IO-360 even when the camera is completely pulled back to the spark plug hole with the piston at BTC. Am I doing something wrong?
@dwdjr693719 күн бұрын
Do these CHT guidelines differ with a LOW compression ratio engine as opposed to a HIGH CR engine, or does this apply across the entire CR spectrum?
@alexanderwilliams-hoffman543620 күн бұрын
Great video! Thanks for the information.
@tomiasthexder767321 күн бұрын
Buyers version of “get there itis” is “must buy now itis”
@dabneyoffermein59521 күн бұрын
For someone who is a career computer scientist, I find this gentleman a satisfactory resource for engine information and maintenance.
@Mistamannfour23 күн бұрын
Unleaded Avgas is not needed: GA aircraft engines should run on Jet-A, problem solved! Delta Hawk has an engine that is now certified that does just that. If the FAA put a mandate, like the ADS-B mandate, for all GA engines to run on Jet-A, Lycoming and Continental would break their necks brushing off old designs, or creating new engine designs, of engines that run on Jet-A! Problem is, Delta Hawk is WAY ahead of them and would corner the market for a long time; however, the FAA should not concern itself with the players in the market, that is not their job! Electronic ignition should be standard for GA engines and FADEC or auto-throttle for engine management should also become standard in GA: pilots should fly the plane, not be an engine manager, that is what modern tech is for.
@MeaHeaR25 күн бұрын
supplemental type certificate A supplemental type certificate ( STC ) is a type certificate ( TC ) issued when an applicant has received FAA approval to modify an aeronautical product from its original design.
@alboreland594929 күн бұрын
That IA who pencil whipped the illegal cylinders needs to be reported to the FAA
@CliffordStaleyАй бұрын
My wife made an app called should I go, for me. You put in fuel cost at home base and remote airport and how far away. It tells you if it is practical to go get fuel.
I cant hear the Audio keep chopping up und Going soft und Loud unt All be Terribly Distorted
@MeaHeaRАй бұрын
I thought he was a Gamé show Host Not a Physician ¿¿¿
@MeaHeaRАй бұрын
Dissapointingly he didunt explain why the shortage, is it because young peopke dont want to beget hand dirty und want tikk tick etc ¿¿¿
@pilotashley620Ай бұрын
Doesn’t Savvy perform a remote logbook review for the buyer as a first phase of their service? Why weren’t the ECI cylinders discovered in the documents audit?
@venutoaКүн бұрын
Thata good question. Mike can u answer this please. I am Considering your svcs
@MeaHeaRАй бұрын
Im confused does this key barrel over ridé the Grandé Mastér Switch ¿¿¿¿¿
@RichRavenMerollaАй бұрын
Mike is the guy. Subscribe to this.
@MayhemCanuckАй бұрын
It still fascinates me how someone can knowingly pick a highly reputable shop like yourselves to manage a pre-buy, knowing they are the best and make recommendations yet not listen to a word of what you said.
@desertdog185Ай бұрын
I live at high altitude and never have more than about 20 inches of MP available to my IO 520 . The way I hear this, as long as my RPM is pulled back to below 2400, this discussion is moot and I could safely run right at Peak EGT?
@desertdog185Ай бұрын
The small aircraft that I fly are strictly based around emotion, never practically. Therefore, I’ll never ride, drive, or fly anything that makes the god awful noise of a Rotax no matter how practical.
@jjchouinard2327Ай бұрын
Remind me, how do I participate live with these videos?