Talking Trash: Ep 109: You Keep Shooting: Adorama Photography TV

[@felicianofoto]

Thinking outside the box - love it!

[@LikeOnATree]

Great one yet again, please keep them coming Bryan!! Thanks!

[@soothingsoundvideos]

never would i have thought of that. thanks as always, Bryan! you're my hero.

[@AndersHPhotography]

Simple but amazing. More of that stuff please !! Thanks

[@diegoeidelman]

I like very much simple ideas Bryan !

[@chicken26arick]

I could watch you all day! Oh, and I LOVE your glasses holder. Looks just like mine:)

[@theborne]

Such creativity. I like it!

[@is1dre]

Bryan, keep it up! I love these.

[@tomkalbo]

Thanx for posting!! You are very creative and inspirational!! Cheers from Norway :)

[@js091402]

Amazing! Thank you Bryan!

[@igam8251]

I just love him as a photographer

[@michael-lt2lf]

Fantastic! Thanks for making me think!

[@yujinlandscapephotography.7787]

Thank you so much! Bryan.

[@fgvd7000]

Artwork at its best

[@blackcoff]

wowww i love you bryan peterson!!!!

[@ggh0sal]

wow ... opened my eyes a bit more

[@MrCoolAttitude]

I've seen all these on PPSOP. Anyway I'm liking these videos

[@ShlomiGreenPhotography]

@ndigerolamo Thanks :) I didn't notice he used a macro lens on this episode.

[@PaulitoEscondido]

Brilliant ! Thank you.

[@ekmev]

Very good Idea ...

[@giri.goyo_yt]

bryan is the nick note of photography. bad ass.

[@rcfalcon56MkII]

What's wrong with f/36? I don't see anything in his imagery shot at high f numbers that would prevent using them. In fact, he even mentions in his book "Understanding Exposure" that the big dust up over diffraction is way over blown. No one has turned down one of his photos over a high f number.

[@ShlomiGreenPhotography]

I noticed Bryan loves stopping his lens down all the way. Up until now all of the episodes were mostly of landscapes and scenery so it makes SOME sense, but regarding this one - why use F/36? There's practically no depth of field to be captured there... F/5.6 would have been just fine and a lot sharper. Not to mention the diffraction that F/36 would cause. Any ideas?

[@MillCityJam]

Great Tip !! I'm going to my local trash heap now.

[@guidlines]

f/36?? What about diffraction?

[@belleofga]

AWESOME!!

[@Hatrevivalist]

very neat ideas thanks

[@tumbleweedfarm]

Awesome!

[@1717jbs]

Thanks. Great idea.

[@MultigrainPie]

nice! love your vids!

[@kilobamya]

Respect!

[@GrimsditchImages]

Turns out Nick Nolte is an awesome photographer. Just kidding... and it's nice to see Bryan finally getting some love on here!

[@LeChiffre2403]

yeah that's what they are made for !

[@ndigerolamo]

@shlomki Since he is using a macro lens, the depth of field is greatly exaggerated. He is perfectly fine shooting at f 8 or even 5.6 on a flat surface, however, If he were to shoot something with 3d perspective, at f/32, almost everything would be in focus, but there would still be signs of out-of-focus. Simply saying, the macro lens drastically increases DOF

[@rafcoutinho]

Nice...but he missed to shoot the butterfly!!

[@Jepraw]

OMG! GJ!!!

[@ascherithgrey2094]

genius... wow

[@kwanbkk]

A lot of blackground noise . Anyway , I love your work , keep going :)

[@derTeddy]

@guidlines just my thought.. O.o

[@raul11559]

You must keep showting bryan

[@TerryCTerry]

Butterfly at 1:34 =)

[@danielbielecki9399]

super

[@offspringy]

Unless you live in the UK where health and safety is present and you aren't even aloud to unbolt parts from cars let alone walk around the scrap yard lol

[@bmbpdk]

0:35 so "artistic" is another word for junk? would that mean that artist should be called junkies? LOL

[@yoyokip1]

get a haircut...

[@GianniVeroni]

find a life