Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8 Review

Perhaps the most anticipated lens of the year for Sony E mount users, the Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8 is finally out. So is it any good? Find out in this video.
Get yours here - amzn.to/3qxXZPp

[@santosovideo]

New to your channel, nice stuff! I too bought this lens right away. So far I've done some video and product photos with it, and it doesn't disappoint!

[@ReleaseYourHandbrake]

The distortion in the middle is very important. This is a video that points it out. Thank you!

[@AlliandWill]

Awesome review man! Love the new talking head setup as well!!

[@HyunRalphJeong]

thank you!

[@parmanduke]

Great review. I'll likely get for my A7R iv. The APS C mode makes it so versatile.

[@esppics21]

Love your videos!!! Thanks

[@LouisLuzuka]

Yay you're back!!

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Haha I never left…just been busy

[@randomthings9032]

Hey Ralph, what's up? We need to see your Vidoe at least once in a month, Miss your videos these days.

[@peterkwakman7440]

Love the way you explain, WW2 comment made me laugh, you always have a sense of humour, Pete from London, thanks

[@aslamhaniffa7240]

Good review and thanks for your feedback of the lens. When purchasing an expensive lens , an approval needed from the wife to enjoy the lens 😀😀that's true because we go through the same😀😀😀

[@johnp1]

Good review.

[@whit3fox]

May i know how does it perform on sony apsc?

[@JeffreyHawkins]

If you hold the lens front aiming up, then turn it over quickly to face straight down, do you feel and hear something loose inside? (Or if you gently shake it front to back, does something rattle inside?)

[@rubenlaurentiu90]

Yes! I have a big question. Will they make an adapter for this lens that can go for other cameras (like Canon, Nikon)? Or maybe they will make the lens version for Canon and Nikon later? Or none of the above...?

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Hi, they haven't announced anything for Canon and Nikon so far. So I wouldn't hold my breath, but I guess you never know.

[@ronp4529]

Like your thinking on having it be a little lighter and cheaper at a constant 2.8.. that'd probably be my ideal lens.

[@HyunRalphJeong]

yeah, that would have been really interesting

[@cruzdesangre2850]

6:38 Wasn't expecting that joke, I got a good laugh out of it

[@vbrooklyn]

Just wondering, why the high ISO numbers on a sunny day? Any explanations would be appreciated

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Hi, which photos were you looking at? It was actually pretty overcast and I shot with auto ISO because it’s a variable aperture lens and it might have jumped up when I increased the shutter speed.

[@LouisLuzuka]

The answer is probably no, but I'm curious does this have image stabilization? Because if it does then I'm sold 💯😀

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Unfortunately it doesn’t, but it hasn’t been an issue so far.

[@mohabouhousse7282]

Please is it cmpatible with canon eos 90d ?

[@HyunRalphJeong]

No, this is for the Sony E mount.

[@senorfrog5605]

i havent had the urge to buy a new lens in a while... but i really want this tamron. do you think it would be stupid of me to sell my 28-75 f2.8 tamron + 70-200 GM, to buy the 35-150 tamron? my back would be so happy since i could carry just my 16-35 GM and the 35-150 tamron, and maybe whatever prime i might feel like having with me on a given day. and itd all fit into my camera sling (yea i have a proper bag, but its so big. it houses the majority of my gear, so i take out all that extraneous stuff if/when i need to take even just 1 more piece of gear with me but it wont fit in my sling.. plus it just looks funny on me cause i kinda look like an oversized elementary school student... and obviously if i dont take out what i need for the day, id just be carrying a lot of extra weight around) i dont necessarily think i'd miss the 50mm at the long end too much... and as much as i love the 70-200... i almost regret returning the f4 for the GM. not that the GMs not great, its just noticeably heavier (i returned the 16-35f4 for the GM also, and even though the GM is always gonna be heavier, on the 16-35, the added weight feels immaterial compared to the extra weight on the 70-200.) even if i did sell those 2 lenses for the tamron, id still have to pay out of pocket. do you think it would be wiser to just keep the holy trinity and save my money, or maybe get a different lens altogether (i've been considering a macro lens). just give it to me straight. i trust you. lol.

[@senorfrog5605]

oh and for the exposed USB port, you could probably get a dozen of rubber caps on amazon for dirt cheap. i bought a bunch when i had my unibody macbook pro, which only had 4 thunderbolt ports.

[@senorfrog5605]

andddd im realizing i should watch the whole video before commenting, since you're addressing all my concerns literally right after i hit save. i know i watched this already, but cut me some slack, that was almost 2 weeks ago.

[@HyunRalphJeong]

@@senorfrog5605 Haha thank you, I guess it all depends on what focal lengths you need but it definitely gives you the most value for your money. But not having to carry a 70-200 is a huge bonus. Just rent one and try it out. I'm sure you'd like it.

[@J_bar_S_Photography]

If you got this lens when it came out then why am i having to wait for this lens after tamron releases it? i ordered it today from B&H and they will ship it when tamron releases?

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Because of the chip shortage, there's still a lot of delays for new lenses and cameras. I assume production will return to normal rate by the end of the year.

[@J_bar_S_Photography]

@@HyunRalphJeong omg i sure hope i dont have to waill till the end of the year to get that lens.

[@anulearntech]

That lens was for dslr only this is for mirrorless only. Both separate designs.

[@stkuj]

Personally, I'd like to see a 35-100 1.4...

[@jalexanderevans]

Ugh unavailable through that link! I want one!

[@HyunRalphJeong]

It might still be delayed in many places. I’ll check again

[@senorfrog5605]

6:45 lols

[@silklion7375]

Just buy an USB-C cover! At least thats what i will do.

[@VinceDae]

Why is that controversial? ... it's only controversial if you don't understand how a port like that works :)