Amanda Knox & Her Husband Christopher Robinson Open Up About Married Life After Acquittal

Amanda Knox became a tabloid sensation after being convicted for the murder of her former roommate, British exchange student Meredith Kercher, in 2007. Over the last decade, Amanda has spent time in jail, been acquitted and was even ordered to stand trial again. Amanda joins “Tamron Hall” for an exclusive interview with her husband, Christopher Robinson, to talk about her experiences and finding love after the tragedy.
#TamronHallShow #TamronHall #AmandaKnox
Subscribe to Tamron Hall Show: bit.ly/2QAZSuD
FIND YOUR TIME AND CHANNEL:
www.tamronhallshow.com
[Put in your zip code in the top portion of the website]
FOLLOW US:
Instagram: / tamronhallshow
Twitter: / tamronhallshow
Facebook: / tamronhall
Pinterest: / tamronhallshow
JOIN OUR SHOW:
www.tamronhallshow.com/be-on-...
From the deeply moving to the purely fun, “Tamron Hall” is a daily destination for all things topical and a platform for viewers to connect with the people who are shaping our world through meaningful, engaging, and entertaining conversations. As a new mom, a newlywed, and a survivor who is proving you can accomplish anything at any age, Tamron Hall brings a refreshing, relatable, unpredictable, and unstoppable voice to television.
Broadcast from New York City featuring a dynamic mix of live and taped shows, “Tamron Hall” airs across the country in national syndication.

[@danilopadilha5915]

will this Tamron invite Merediths family to speak as well? i doubt it!

[@rachal4685]

She couldn’t/wouldn’t even say Meredith’s name

[@danilopadilha5915]

and how could have tried to frame Lumumba? you are not an honest person!

[@Anu20810]

The kercher family is still suffering and she is here married and enjoying with her husband and baby. So emotionless. Met her ex with family and had dinner. They have moved on. But that family? This lady has no feelings at all

[@mytrip6991]

What do you expect her to do? Live her life like it's Nov. 1, 2007 for the rest of her life?

[@kevinthunder3375]

She went through hell. If course, she would try to move on. I would too! What happened was horrible but I wouldn't want it to rule me life forever. Unfortunately, that will never quite happen with her; it will always follow her, so she can only do her best to live her life. Yes, that includes having a family. She was quite excited about her kids. Very far from emotionless.

[@levdavid2412]

As the "exoneree" fame is wearing off, Amanda Knox is embarking on a path of confession by innuendos.

[@treaclebuns]

Care to provide any examples?

[@A.F.U-A]

Still waiting on those examples

[@Capcoor]

@@A.F.U-AMe three. Chicken.

[@deathlarsen7502]

i like how the sociopath is wearing an Amish outfit like she's some nice girl and not a killer

[@mytrip6991]

Not one mention of any evidence against Knox, but 3 comments on irrelevant nonsense including her husband's beard and looking like a 'serial killer' and Knox wearing a sweater with a blouse under it. Sigh.....

[@RationalNon-conformist]

She could be a sociopath and not the killer.. you do realize that, right?

[@deathlarsen7502]

@@RationalNon-conformist no I don't realize that bc I need you to tell me 🙄

[@MK-jc9ov]

You are an ignorant fool! She was acquitted of the murder.

[@giannamarie252]

Guilty still 😮

[@Aurora-dq4lt]

It's disgusting how she became famous for Meredith's death, and she has fans too. What a disgusting world we live in.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@Aury well, she didn’t really ask to be famous. And after her case was over, she couldn’t go back to being anonymous. What she did was use her name recognition to promote awareness of wrongful convictions

[@noeldee9236]

She was famous being accused of murder she didn’t convict

[@annm51789]

What an ignorant comment to make. She didn't ASK to be famous and who in their right might would want to be famous for MURDER. Imagine you're living your life and trying to be a good human being and something like this happens to you. I'm sure you'd love to see comments like your own. You're disgusting for simply what you said.

[@Aurora-dq4lt]

@@annm51789 Amanda and Raffaele Sollecito were first condemned for the murder of Meredith. Then they got away with thanks to their good lawyers. Nobody believes that Amanda was innocent in Italy

[@bjornsundberg1947]

Hi Aury, You can compare her to the fame and the money the McCanns have been awarded with, because they neglected their toddler Madeleine. Always smiling in interviews, just like Knox does.

[@fionafinch348]

I wish Meredith Kercher could be here to be interviewed. Knox slams the media coverage but her people hired a publicity machine to show her in a positive light. It worked for some.

[@mytrip6991]

Yes, her family hired a company to help combat all the false lies and misinformation being reported about her in the media. Shame on them for that! How dare they not challenge completely false headlines like "I Fired Foxy Knox" (Daily Mail, Nov 25, 2007) , " Foxy Knoxy Caught on CCTV Tape" (Daily Mail, 12 Nov. 2007), and "Chilling pictures of Meredith murder scene reveal apartment bloodbath horror" (Daily Mail, 16 Jan, 2008) ! Totally false stories permeated the media, stories that included such lies as "Amanda Knox made at least two calls to his [Rudy Guede's] number, one of them at 11am on 2 November, around the time police discovered Kercher's body." (The Independent, 20 November 2007) and "The arrest warrant for Amanda Knox, 20, discloses that her print was discovered on the face of Meredith Kercher, who was found in her bed with her throat cut, a respected Italian newspaper claims." (The Telegraph, 09 Nov. 2007) and "Investigator Giuliano Mignini claimed a bloody fingerprint belonging to Amanda Knox had been found on a bathroom tap." (Nov. 27, 2007) and "She is reported to have written: “I think it is possible Raffaele went to Meredith’s house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife.” (BBC News, 23 November 2010) Yep, shame on her family for hiring a company to help expose the lies being presented as facts about their daughter! Do they have no shame?

[@legally_ellecee1309]

Yeah it worked for a lot. But some of us know she is guilty. The forensic evidence speaks for itself.

[@rogershuttleworth7669]

@@legally_ellecee1309 That's strange considering the forensic evidence implicates Rudy Guede alone.

[@kevinthunder3375]

​@@legally_ellecee1309the forensic evidence, as well as the botched investigation, is how she got off. The investigators contaminated the crime scene. There was no evidence of her involvement. Yes, her DNA was present in the apartment but she lived there with Meredith, so, of course, it would be there. Her DNA was not on the body or the murder weapon. Rudy's fingerprints and DNA, however, was all over Meredith.

[@patriciamerlo6864]

@Tamron Hall, under what considerations, you dare to interview this narcissist guilty woman? What kind of journalism are you practicing? It is disgusting! To @Amanda Knox, nothing but nothing can delete what you have done. People can forget but justice will come to you because God is still on His throne. It means you will bitterly pay one day. I don't want to be in your shoes, Amanda Knox!

[@mytrip6991]

Oh, please. Stop virtue signaling by preaching about 'God on his His throne' when you defame a woman who was acquitted of murder by the Supreme Court of Italy because they acknowledged the evidence did NOT support she killed Kercher. Rudy Guede did.

[@petelovatt8357]

I love how she dresses like a Little House on the Prairie character for interviews lol

[@napoleonsparis2058]

@Pete Lovatt...Yes. Accurate way to describe it. I've noticed the high button collars in these interviews. Plus, lots of lace.

[@kapilair1770]

😆

[@neige4221]

I’ve had the exact same thought. Interesting how she presents herself or better yet why does she keep putting herself out there to talk about something so disturbing. Doesn’t she think of Meredith’s family constantly seeing her out there? Not very empathetic in my opinion.

[@levdavid2412]

The only wrongly accused here was the barman.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@LevDavid - how many times does Amanda have to explain that she was coerced by the police into accusing him? They already suspected him because of a text to him they found on Amanda’s phone (they wouldn’t allow her to call her mother btw). She hadn’t slept much in the past few days, the police had yelled at her and told her she’d go to prison for 30 years if they didn’t tell her who the killer was. One officer even hit her, twice! She has referred to the interrogation as the worst night of her life because she felt like she had gone insane and couldn’t distinguish fantasy from reality.

[@tonywelsh3709]

How did she know Meredith had her throat slit i.e. she admitted this to Meredith's friends & her flatmates when the police didn't even know the cause of death. Plus she admitted in the first trail no kitchen utensils had been taken too or from her house to her boyfriends, in order words, how did the victims (Meredith) & your DNA ned up on the exact same knife? She must have changed her story over 10 times about where she was on the night of the murder but her telephone & laptop records say otherwise. her blood along with the victim on taps, light switches, the bidet etc etc Plus the hard driver in hers & her boyfriend's laptop were removed from the actual laptop-bizarre. Eye witnesses saw her in the morning of 2nd Nov 2007 & the night before when she was supposed to be in bed. Honestly, it goes on & on & on & on & OJ Simpson style on & on....

[@mytrip6991]

​@@tonywelsh3709 1) "How did she know Meredith had her throat slit?" She knew because Luca Altieri (who had broken down Meredith's door) told her when he was driving Raffaele and her to the police station later that afternoon per his sworn deposition: "Altieri: Yes, yes, yes, after a while, you know, after the Red Cross car arrived, the Scientific Police and the Carabinieri arrived, all of them, after a while one of the two medics, I believe, the driver of the Red Cross, it wasn’t an ambulance, he came out of the crime scene, let’s say, from inside the house, speaking to one of the Carabinieri that was there outside and he described a bit about what had happened, saying… referring to the both the fact the her throat had been cut and that she had also fought back, let’s say, and from this I understood this thing. Mignini: OK, do you remembe if Sollecito spoke to you in the Police Station, did he speak of this fact? What did he say to you? Altieri: Look, the only exchange of words was while we were going to the Police station in the car, let’s say, where he asked me if she was dead. I was a bit shocked at the question, I responded “yes”. And then after he asked me, if I remember correctly, how she died, something of this sort, and so I explained to him this thing that I’d heard outside." 2) "Plus she admitted in the first trail no kitchen utensils had been taken too or from her house to her boyfriends, in order words, how did the victims (Meredith) & your DNA ned up on the exact same knife? " Meredith's DNA was NOT on the knife per the findings of the independent, court appointed forensic experts, Carla Vecchiotti and Stefano Conti: "Taking into account that none of the recommendations of the international scientific community relative to the treatment of Low Copy Number (LCN) samples were followed, we do not accept the conclusions regarding the certain attribution of the profile found on trace B (blade of knife) to the victim Meredith Susanna Cara Kercher, since the genetic profile, as obtained, appears unreliable insofar as it is not supported by scientifically validated analysis;" 3) "She must have changed her story over 10 times about where she was on the night of the murder but her telephone & laptop records say otherwise." False. The phone records show her calls were handled by the cell phone towers that covered Sollecito's apartment per the report of the telecommunications expert, Filippo Bartolozzi. "20:18:12 Patrick Lumumba sends a text message to Amanda saying she wasn’t needed at work. Cell Via dell’Aquila 5-Torre dell’Acquedotto sector 3. Cell tower covers Raffaele’s apartment (See notes below). Amanda and Raffaele are watching Amelie [129min]. 20:35:48 Amanda responds with a text message to Lumumba. The message is “Certo. Ci vediamo più tardi. Buona serata” [Sure, See you later on. Have a good evening] Cell Via Berardi sector 7" The Massei Report specifically says that those cell towers covered RS's apartment: "1. The area around the defendant’s home was reached by a very strong signal radiated from the Via Berardi sector 7 cell, indicated as being the ‚best server cell‛ with regard to Sollecito’s house; furthermore the signals of other cells are also powerful, respectively that with a pylon in Piazza Lupattelli sector 8 and that with a pylon in Via dell’Acquilla-Torre dell’Acquedotto sectors 3 and 9."

[@jason03ism]

@@TheWchurchill4pm Another foxy knoxy fan. Only she know's the truth. One thing she is guilty of is having NO shame for Meredith family and 15 years on, still going on about it and cashing in.

[@legally_ellecee1309]

@@TheWchurchill4pmyou clearly have no understanding of psychopaths or how extremely rare false confessions are. Besides all that, the forensic evidence speaks for itself. This woman killed and so did her ex bf. Guede was also involved. The truth will come out someday I am certain.

[@alliereesor115]

I bet Meredith Kercher would have liked to escape that room, Amanda.

[@taquitocruz9398]

I am sure Amanda is guilty . I can see the evil in that eyes , I have never been wrong . You cannot fool me…

[@bjornsundberg1947]

Why not invite OJ Simpson and let him entertain us.

[@ronemtae3468]

Fool

[@dappydep]

This girl is a psychopath. Everyone loves a freakshow.

[@bjornsundberg1947]

@@dappydep Yes Tuco, and every time Amanda Knox decides to participate in a talk show or uses other media platforms to talk about how innocent she is, her guilt becomes more and more obvious. Like all psychopaths she believes that she can fool people by talking about her suffering and about the world's injustice of which she claims that she' s become a victim and there's nothing in her, like conscience, empathy or soul preventing her from accusing others for what happened to her.

[@seattlejayde]

I just wish Amanda would talk about the victim Meredith .... Meredith needs to be Honored. RIP Meredith

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

I don’t think her family and friends would want her “honoured” by her murderer. She is incapable of empathy she’s a psychopath. She should have left them to grieve in peace, but she enjoys her power to hurt.

[@seattlejayde]

@@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg I just meant that when she speaks, I think it would be great to hear her acknowledge Meredith ...

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

@@seattlejayde It’s just jarring when she imitates a human being with empathy, it’s best she doesn’t.

[@seattlejayde]

@@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg Yes, true

[@treaclebuns]

@@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg You said "She is incapable of empathy she’s a psychopath." *Where did that diagnosis come from? Were there any psychological assessments during the proceedings that would indicate any such thing, or did you just make it up? You said "She should have left them to grieve in peace," *WTF! She doesn't mention the Kercher family in the video. She is merely responding to the interviewer's questions. You said "but she enjoys her power to hurt." *No that's YOU, not Amanda.

[@marieladegante4873]

It’s disgusting how people think she is innocent. This type of shi* is why the world is so fc*d!! I hope the people who think she is innocent never go thru what Meredith family went thru! God bless

[@creativeminds5405]

Lets blame you for her murder without no proofs and lock you up for 26 years. You happy?

[@meh23p]

It’s disgusting how people like you still won’t leave her alone.

[@Hangar.18]

She is just as innocent as oj simpson! 😉

[@petelovatt8357]

I like the way they always say “people have preconceived ideas because of the media” lol. The mainstream media in the US and subsequently most of the internet is overwhelmingly pro-Amanda. She has a huge PR company working for her. It’s only when you dig past the MSM propaganda that you get into changed testimonies, DNA evidence, staged burglaries and absurd deception on Amanda’s part.

[@brosephjames]

Clearly she's guilty and the crook at the scene with Meredith's blood all over his hands was just a figment of everyone's imagination. Or maybe you're just wrong?

[@ninguno141]

It’s an exhausting task to answer to the long copy and paste comments written by the Public Relations machinery all over the places. We all know this creep is guilty and that’s all we need.

[@mytrip6991]

What you do, ninguno141, is repeatedly post lies and misinformation even after being presented with quoted and cited proof from the court records your claims are false. Your intellectual dishonesty is obvious because you just ignore anything that doesn't confirm your bias.

[@bredforslavery114]

excape game... after all that happened before ? this woman is a full package of weirdness... she freaks me out each time i see her speaking...

[@taraiarusso9625]

escape. Weirdness isn't illegal.

[@bredforslavery114]

@@taraiarusso9625 i said weirdness... not illegal. the illegal part was before ;) thank you for correcting me for escape. i'm not american or english ;)

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

She was always weird as a kid, or so I’ve heard. I think it’s great that prison didn’t take that out of her. Her weirdness is an inspiration!

[@retroplank]

Whatever… he is with her for the notoriety

[@graziagabriellananna2929]

Sorry, but the sentence doesn't say that HE DID IT. He was not the killer. He was present at the house WITH two other persons. He has his part of guilt, but he wasn't the perpetuator of the crime. Read the sentence before you say crap live.

[@mytrip6991]

When Guede was convicted in 2008, Knox and Sollecito had not even been tried yet. Guede's conviction says he did not actually wield the knife. Why? Because at that time, Kercher's alleged DNA on the alleged murder knife and the knife as the murder weapon had not been discredited as both were in 2011 and confirmed by the Supreme Court in 2015. In 2009, the prosecution was accusing Knox of being the killer because they claimed Kercher's DNA was on the kitchen knife which is why Guede was said not to have actually killed Kercher. But they never explained who wielded the knife that left its imprint in blood on the bed and which was never found. When Guede's sentence was confirmed in 2010 by the Giordano SC, it became a 'judicial fact' that he did not wield the knife and that someone else did. That is written in stone and cannot be overruled even by another Supreme Court. But Knox was definitively acquitted in 2015 by the Marasca SC that stated if there were others involved, they were NOT Knox or Sollecito. So legally, Guede didn't stab Kercher, but who did remains unknown. However, since there is absolutely no forensic evidence of anyone in Kercher's bedroom other than Guede, that "judicial fact" is in direct conflict with the science.

[@Walklikeaduck111]

Why does she still seek the limelight...

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 However, that's not true is it? She highlights the fact that innocent people are banged up in prison on a daily basis. That could happen to any of us, wrong place, wrong time. That's a fact of life whether you like it or not.

[@alabama.worley]

Classic narcissistic grandiosity, coupled by her sadistic pleasure at reliving the experience.

[@treaclebuns]

Worley, you originally said she was a "textbook psychopath" "I stand by my theory, based on my professional findings and the evidence as a whole, that Amanda Knox is undeniably a textbook Psychopath, and did act with malice in the brutal slaying of Meredith."

[@PeepersT]

@@alabama.worley yes she can’t revisit the scene of the crime to get her rocks off so she created that true crime podcast so she can vicariously enjoy murder

[@Livsfitz]

To stay relevant and pay everyone back the millions they dished out to visit her and defend her

[@Vvvvvvvvc]

She gives me weird vibe... her smile.. her attitude is just so... weird

[@jafellme3024]

Shes just a Super Freak i can see it in her eyes!

[@paintthesky3770]

Her eyes, remind me of stephanie lazarus

[@presidentofnothing]

Because she murdered someone and is using it to make a career. It’s fucking weird.

[@treaclebuns]

@@presidentofnothing Really?! Who did she murder?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 You said "Look up the word psychopath and you'll see she ticks all the boxes." Yet there were no psychiatric reports arising from the proceedings that would confirm any such thing.

[@dee2973]

Interesting how both her husband and later Megan Markle says they never googled their future spouses despite them both having huge profiles, and in this case, infamy.

[@nensi5813]

Because its bs

[@nensi5813]

I actually thought the same thing.

[@diakristy6262]

It is interesting. Clearly they trusted their OWN judgement over the countless words that came before. Truly, christopher is a REAL keeper!

[@dee2973]

@ Dia Kristy Her husband will be writing a book 'My Life. The truth' This is what it's all about. 15 mins of fame and then book in the thrift store for 10cents

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 It's all just juicy canards from you isn't it. If you can't nail Amanda with any sustainable evidence you attack her husband who has also done no wrong. Yet it's Amanda who is allegedly the psychopath not you?

[@simonalittera1127]

Still looking for spotlight. You are absolutely unavailable

[@dral9657]

Who cares about her life today ? Meredith doesn’t have this opposite !

[@mytrip6991]

Thanks to Rudy Guede whose DNA was in her, on her, and under her. Whose bloody shoeprints were under and around her. Whose DNA was in her blood on her purse. Who fled Perugia. Who was unemployed and needed money. None of which pertain to Knox or Sollecito.

[@NotMeNow848]

Does anybody care about this narcissist?

[@kikaysann5103]

My God 😡😡😡😡.. My heart goes To Meredith.. Not buying amanda's story

[@natalielawrence8809]

I think if she had any respect for "her good friend" Meredith.. and Meredith's Family, she would stop shoving her face into any public opportunity possible. I bet Meredith's Family wonder if Meredith would have married one day too. So typically insensitive of a narcicist at best.. and perhaps it's quite deliberate and vengeful too. Sadly, it's another thing we'll never formally know.. but my gut instinct doesn't lie.

[@slim11shock]

Smile as much as you want, people still see through it

[@noeldee9236]

She’s innocent

[@michelealbanese3261]

@@noeldee9236 Nop, at all

[@jason03ism]

@@noeldee9236 HOW DO YOU KNOW FOR SURE??? Only foxy knoxy know's what happened on that night. One ting she is 100% guilty of is trying to make herself a celeb out of all this and having NO respect for Meredith and her family. Shame on her.

[@LilianaGarcia-ve7ob]

@noeldee... I don't think, I think rudy Amanda and Raphael were The killers. Maybe it is another story : FM story...

[@gdm1979]

This outfit and hair… wtf?!!! It’s like she is trying way too hard…

[@stone.orlanski2728]

Knox est coupable !

[@lesgrossman1274]

“She ( #amandaknox ) wanted to be the queen bee, and as the weeks passed, it became clear that she wasn't. She hated anyone stealing her limelight - and that included Meredith." Patrick Lumumba 11/24/2007

[@treaclebuns]

If that were true why didn't Lumumba say it in court?

[@Matsoni85]

@@treaclebuns why did knox frame Patrick after half a day in jail?

[@treaclebuns]

@@Matsoni85 It's very likely that it was the police themselves who initiated Lumumba into the equation. We don't know exactly what happened on the night of 5th-6th November since the mandatory audio visual recordings were not complied with; however, we do know that not only were Amanda's human rights violated but code of criminal procedure was also violated. The fact is that the 1.45 am statement that implicated Lumumba in the crime was not originated by Amanda. It was typed up by the police themselves who only required her signature.

[@Matsoni85]

@@treaclebuns I genuinely believe Amanda started as a not so interesting person, but she spoke her way into the investigation. She performed gymnastics while she was waiting for Raffaelle and that made her more interesting. The other co-tenants believe she acted very shady and strange in that time period. Did you read the email she sent home the 4th. Basically a defense letter sent before the Police had any interesert. I could carry on... I also believe the DNA nails Sollecito to the bra clasp. There is DNA trough contamination and there is DNA trough direct contact. The latter has a distinct nuanced profile.

[@treaclebuns]

@@Matsoni85 You said "I genuinely believe Amanda started as a not so interesting person, but she spoke her way into the investigation." Amanda was interrogated for 53 hours in total between 2nd and the 6th November. The questioning startered on the 2nd November, only hours after Meredith's body was found. You said "The other co-tenants believe she acted very shady and strange in that time period" They never said anything remotely like that in court. You said "Did you read the email she sent home the 4th. Basically a defense letter sent before the Police had any interesert." Amanda was already being questioned along with others by police by that time. You said "I also believe the DNA nails Sollecito to the bra clasp. There is DNA trough contamination and there is DNA trough direct contact." You can say what you like about the bra-clasp. The Italian Supreme Court referred to the court appointed experts and threw it out, citing probable contamination issues and the failure to follow correct protocols in testing the item. No negative controls were carried out on the bra-clasp so we will never know if the DNA was actually on the clasp or equipment contamination. The clasp was deliberately destroyed as evidence by prosecution darling Stefanoni who stored it in extraction buffer fluid allowing the hooks to rust.

[@mjoomj]

"what happened to me was an extreme.... " Erm no! What happened to Meredith was heartbreaking and extreme. You murdering her was barbaric and savage.

[@tonywelsh3709]

How did she know Meredith had her throat slit i.e. she admitted this to Meredith's friends & her flatmates when the police didn't even know the cause of death. Plus she admitted in the first trail no kitchen utensils had been taken too or from her house to her boyfriends, in order words, how did the victims (Meredith) & your DNA ned up on the exact same knife? She must have changed her story over 10 times about where she was on the night of the murder but her telephone & laptop records say otherwise. her blood along with the victim on taps, light switches, the bidet etc etc Plus the hard driver in hers & her boyfriend's laptop were removed from the actual laptop-bizarre. Eye witnesses saw her in the morning of 2nd Nov 2007 & the night before when she was supposed to be in bed. Honestly, it goes on & on & on & on & OJ Simpson style on & on....

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

When she asked at the station if Meredith was dead (she hadn’t seen her body) an officer nodded and moved his finger across his throat. I’m sure word had gotten around amongst the police that Meredith’s throat had been cut. He probably didn’t mean to give anything away; he might have thought that, because Italian wasn’t Amanda’s first language, he needed to use gestures to make himself understood. I don’t believe Meredith’s blood was on the knife. Amanda has said she’d been slicing a tomato, and it was probably with that particular knife because the officer who collected it remembered it had looked like it had just been washed. The substance on the blade for so minuscule that it couldn’t be tested twice. False positives are common when samples are that small. She also says in her book that the laptop hard drives were damaged in police custody. Convenient, she says, because the photos she’d taken of herself and Meredith were on them. I know that at least two witness testimonies were compromised. The shop owner said he say Amanda buying bleach while wearing a gray coat. He’d probably seen her wearing the coat on TV when they showed her kissing Raffaele. The homeless man who said he saw them the night of the murder was an acquaintance of the prosecutor - and during his testimony, the prosecutor got him to backtrack something he’d said that was bad for their case.

[@treaclebuns]

@@TheWchurchill4pm Thanks for reminding me of the incident with the throat-cutting gesture, though both Raffaele and Amanda had already learned of Meredith's fate from Luca Alteiri and Paolo Grande before they even got to the questura. Here is their testimonies: Altieri: Yes, yes, yes, after a while, here, after a red cross vehicle had arrived, the scientific, the Carabinieri arrived, all of them, after a while one of the two doctors, I think, of this red cross vehicle, it was not an ambulance, he came out from the inspection, let's say, inside the house, addressing one of the Carabinieri who was out there he described a bit what had happened, saying ... referring both to the fact that her throat was cut and the fact that she had also fought, let's say, and so from there I learned this. GM: she learned it, do you know if the others knew it too? In particular... Altieri: Yes, there was Paola next to me who heard it. From Paolo Grande's court testimony: "No, I saw them for a minute as soon as we arrived that Marco and Filomena told him, a little in Italian a little in English, to say everything, to say everything they remembered to be calm, to tell what they remembered and enough. More than anything else in the car trip I remember that Raffaele asked Luca if she was dead, he said yes and how she was dead and Luca told him that it had been slaughtered because ... I don't know how Luca knew it, but I I knew it because when the ambulance arrived, a gentleman came in and when he came out he didn't talk to us, but I heard him, who said how she was killed." When Raffaele asked if Meredith had been cut with a knife, he was told by Luca "no with a loaf of bread" according to Honor Bound. There was no blood on the knife.. Fact! 36b was tested with TMB which came back negative for blood. No only that the knife was negative for cellular material and even came back negative for human species according to the court appointed experts (Conti-Vecchiotti). Agreed! Quintavalle's testimony was rubbished by the supreme court since he, as well as ear-witnesses Dramis and Monachia came forward a full YEAR after the murder at the prompting of the same reporter. The supreme court rule out any hypothesis of a clean-up in multiple occasions in the motivation report for good reasons. There was no comment of any smell of cleaning materials amongst the many people who were at the cottage before Meredith's body was found. There is no mention of the existing cleaning materials being exhausted or the need to buy more. It's all nonsense. None of this will penetrate through to Tony in any case. He'll just repeat the same old lies elsewhere. He'll just go "on and on" and ....yawn!

[@presidentofnothing]

Why are people glorifying a murderer?

[@dee2973]

Because they are stupid that's why and needs to get a life of their own.

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 You implicate Amanda in the murder of Meredith but you don't have the savvy to make sense of it. Can you offer a narrative and timeline to implicate K&S in the murder or not? If not, YOU need to get a life of your own.

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 You said " Can you offer a narrative and timeline to implicate K&S in the murder or not, Tommy Rot? If not, YOU need to get a life of your own."???? What an incredibly dumb question. I don't have a narrative to implicate K&S in the murder since I don't believe they were involved. Are you sure you're feeling OK.

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 I think what you really meant was do I have a timeline and narrative to implicate RUDY in the murder of Meredith? If so, please advise.

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 I said please advise!

[@PeepersT]

What an act. Highly calculated. Neither of them dress like this. They are dressed like grandparents from the 50s, but you can’t fool everyone! I see you Amanda and Chris for what you are. No one traumatized by prison would have an escape room for their wedding! She’s thumbing her nose at poor Merediths family.

[@alisaalisa2060]

Yes bcs she can not help it being herself

[@annm51789]

Weird comment. A detective behind a keyboard, wow.

[@lorrainea.285]

SHE IS SICK AND A PSYCHOPATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@CLYDEWEBBER94]

This woman wrongly accused her boss, and caused her to spend a year in prison for nothing. She then blames her boyfriend. And she finally blamed her roommate's boyfriend. You Americans are very arrogant in this situation, you defend the devil just because he comes from the United States. Innocent pays for crimes you have committed. Shame on you.

[@mytrip6991]

Where do you get such misinformation? HE, not she, spent TWO WEEKS, not "a year" in jail. Her boss was a man. She also recanted her statements about him and gave them to police, one within HOURS in writing and again the next day with an even stronger recantation. She NEVER blamed her boyfriend. She NEVER blamed her roommate's boyfriend. I'd say you're the arrogant one when you have posted such blatantly false statements. Shame on YOU.

[@kevinthunder3375]

European Court of Human Rights even stated that Amanda's civil rights were violated. She was completely railroaded.

[@a.wanderer5006]

I accept the facts as understood but then every time i see her, she just comes off so false. Even the clothes and the husband are highly suspect.

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

An innocent person wouldn’t milk their infamy, or refuse to pay compensation to the attempt to fit up an innocent man, which her weird apologists like to lie about and call a “false confession” but then you can’t expect morals from her cheerleaders I suppose.

[@treaclebuns]

Did you know that the 1.45 statement implicating Patrick Lumumba was originated and typed up by the cops? No handwritten original from Amanda exists. The real truth about Lumumba is that the cops had no reason to hold him probably beyond the 6th of November and certainly by the 8th when Lumumba was ordered to be detained along with Amanda and Raffaele. Amanda had retracted her compliance with the 1.45 statement on the 7th and it would have clear that the DNA from the cheek swabs taken from Lumumba did not match the DNA from the "unknown male" found in Meredith's vagina. So regardless of whoever the "unknown male was it certainly wasn't Lumumba. The cops should have released him at that point and regarded Amanda's retraction of her compliance with the cops 1.45 witness testimony as valid. The fact that the cops let him languish in the cells for two weeks needs their explanation NOT Amanda's, nor anyone else's for that matter.

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

@@treaclebuns Why have you so many aliases as Rosa points out? They didn’t have Patrick on the radar why would they? What you’ve written is un true. Not only did she try to frame, an innocent man within an hour and half of interview, with no violence, another lie to excuse the revolting actions of this psychopath she’s never even paid the poor man the compensation she was ordered to has she? Even though she’s earned millions from torturing the Kircher family by interviews, her fictional account of their daughters murder etc. Choose another heroine, “Tom” or whatever your name is. Maybe you’re just a cynical paid goon.?

[@treaclebuns]

@@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg Why have you so many aliases as Rosa points out? *Nope! I comment with one username. Would you mind telling me who these multiple aliases are? Should be interesting!?! They didn’t have Patrick on the radar why would they? *No they didn't but the investigators thought that a perfectly innocent "see you later" idiom could be translated as "hey let's meet up and slaughter my flat-mate". Just remember the 1.45 statement was NOT originated by Amanda as previously indicated. What you’ve written is un true. * Yet you offer no counter-argument. Not only did she try to frame, an innocent man within an hour and half of interview, with no violence, another lie to excuse the revolting actions of this psychopath she’s never even paid the poor man the compensation she was ordered to has she? * Pure speculation. The mandatory audio-visual recordings were either not complied with or never released. I can only refer you again to the current ongoing legal proceedings that resulted from the ECHR judgement. Italy has already paid Amanda compensation for gross human rights violations. They also violated their own domestic laws in convicting Amanda of calunnia (slander of Lumumba). If the calunnia conviction is quashed it may allow Lumumba the opportunity to sue Italy for wrongful imprisonment. That's the current state of play. Live in the past if you want, that's your self-denial. Even though she’s earned millions from torturing the Kircher family by interviews, her fictional account of their daughters murder etc. *So now you do Amanda's accounts do you? How is she torturing the Kercher family?...What dramatized rubbish. Meredith was killed by a sequence of actual events, not media spin and judicial facts. You and the remaining Kercher family need to get used to that. Choose another heroine, “Tom” or whatever your name is. Maybe you’re just a cynical paid goon.? *Nope! No heroines in my life, nor do I get paid for my comments. So you can't even get that right, can you?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Nurturing allies are we? You said "Tommy Rot" is a pervert. *You can call me what you like. This isn't a bona-fide forum where comments are moderated. Your playground jibes just get boring after a while. His "method" is to contradict every bit of evidence against his beloved and to denigrate any lawyer or other expert who believes her guilty. *Au contraire. As I've already told you Meredith died as a sequence of actual events that may not be judicial facts. I pursue this case to evaluate these judicial facts using common sense and logic as my filter. Not all of the judicial facts in the motivation reports make it through that filter. The ones that do are what I consider to be actual facts as well as judicial facts. He is so swollen-headed that he believes he knows the true facts, which lawyers didn't. His obsession in particular is with a "timeline" and "narrative of events" which those believing Knox is guilty should provide whereas he can provide none to show she's innocent other than by lying and twisting. *I've already told you multiple times that Meredith died as a result of an actual narrative and timeline of events. That is the logical foundation to solve the case. I've also already told you that section 8.1. of the motivation report details the judicial AND actual fact that there was absolutely no evidence of K&S in the room, when there should have been traces at least equal to that of Rudy. That was the "insurmountable monolithic barrier" according to M/B, in a case that was DNA driven from the start. As previously said, you continue to assert guilt as a default position while offering no sustainable evidence to back it up. How then can I provide you with a narrative and timeline to disprove evidence that doesn't exist in the first place? That's the more than adequate answer to your question.

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

@@treaclebuns I’ll take her word over yours. Get back to your Amanda scrapbook

[@avnistar2703]

She should be behind bars not giving so many interviews. Her behaviour has been disgusting. Poor Meredith.

[@julesminne8347]

And you wouldn’t have all this publicity if you didn’t kill someone. It’s so sad poor Meredith she needs justice Amanda Knox belongs in prison

[@Truthspeakeralways]

Agreed

[@mateuszmazurek7991]

💯

[@ronemtae3468]

@@Truthspeakeralways Oh my God you’re so silly

[@world-of-silla]

Give me proof

[@ronemtae3468]

@@world-of-silla There is zero proof she killed anybody and there is a ton of proof that the guy that convicted and locked up did all of it but there’s some people you just can’t save

[@lesgrossman1274]

In order to believe that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, you have to overlook the following: Knox's accusation against her employer, a claim she made after less than TWO HOURS of being interviewed (not 40, like Team Knox would have you believe - this is a proven fact) and stuck to for 3 weeks, letting her innocent boss rot in jail all the while. The fact that Meredith Kercher’s blood was found mixed inside Knox’s fresh DNA in 5 different spots in the bathroom. The fact the Knox was bleeding on the day of the murder, and left blood smeared in the bathroom, blood which she herself admits was not there the day before. Sollecito’s DNA on Meredith’s bra clasp - with a 16 loci match, the probability that the DNA belongs to someone else is one in a trillion, and with only ONE other DNA trace of him in the cottage (cigarette butt) the idea of contamination is near impossible. Knox’s DNA on the handle of the murder weapon and Meredith’s on the blade. Sollectio tried to explain this by saying he had accidentally pricked Meredith with his knife while she had been at his house. She had never been there. The THREE sets of bloody footprints, one a match for Guede, one a match for Sollecito, and one in Knox’s size, in her own DNA, mixed with Meredith’s. The single bloody footprint on the bathmat, which is a perfect match for Sollecito, and also, being the only bloody footprint with no others around it, is undisputed proof a clean up happened. The blatantly staged crime scene, with glass on TOP of the clothes strewn around, a near impossible window entry point, and not a single trace of Guede anywhere in that room, not to mention the fact Knox and Sollecito ‘knew’ nothing had been taken before anyone had even looked. The fact that Guede’s footprints lead right out Meredith’s room out the front door and he has an alibi for the rest of the night, meaning we KNOW it wasn’t Guede who returned to the scene hours later, staged a burglary, cleaned up and moved the body. The fact that Knox’s lamp was found in Meredith’s room with no fingerprints whatsoever - more proof of a clean up. The incredible amount of changes in her account before, during, and after she was arrested. Total lack of alibi after multiple attempts, and then Sollecito withdrawing his alibi for her. Her dubious account of her activity the morning after the murder, including her lies about Meredith’s locked door, her reaction to the blood, and the contradictions to this she makes in her testimony, email home, and in her book. The fact Knox knew several details about her murder she could not possibly have known: cause of death, position of body, that there had been more than one attacker, that Meredith had been assaulted etc. The frantic call she made to her mother in the middle of the night that she ‘forgets’ making. The witness who saw her and Sollecito by the cottage on the murder night. The shopkeeper who saw her when she claimed to be in her bed sleeping. Her overall behaviour after the murder. And I can go on, and on, and on. My point is that, whatever opinion people have as to their guilty or innocence, there is enough evidence to convict, and however many times those claims of “no evidence" are repeated, it doesn't make it true.

[@jupitergrls]

Thank You!

[@sekainiheiwa3650]

BRAVO! I was cleared back in 2008 then the political circus began

[@bjornsundberg1947]

Yes, this became a political issue. There are as you've pointed out evidence of Knox's guilt. If they, from an international perspective would be enough for a fair prosecution and a verdict leading to a sentence of more than 20 years as was the case in the first Italian trial is a question that could be discussed at length. Anyway, nothing seems to point away from Knox, who by all definitions must be described as a psychopath, who cares about no-one but herself. I'm tired of listening to her lies. I wonder why Joe Rogan, with whom I in many other cases agree, didn't do any serious research before inviting her to an interview. Thanks Les Grossman for info.

[@angc1456]

yes she killed Meredith !

[@bevbag2715]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWnSZX95h5x5q6s

[@charlesdanger9688]

I can't get over dudes facial hair choice. Makes me question his life decisions.

[@VINO9411]

He looks like he goes both ways

[@NFLjunk79]

he's engaged with HER.. What else do you need to know..

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

Now they have a daughter. Her name is Eureka Muse Robinson.

[@meh23p]

@@TheWchurchill4pm And around the same time she was growing in the belly, he seemingly has decided to dispense with the unique beard. Edit: The girl also has her mother’s name. Eureka Muse Knox Robinson. 😊

[@kapple654]

hahahahah xxxx

[@sonnyboy5566]

Escape media scrutiny? She craved for media attention even when her “friend” had just been killed. She pointed a finger against an innocent man without shame and she never even apologised. To me she’s evil.

[@ninaabdullah1043]

Maaf kawan. Amanda telah minta maaf dan mengaku. Ketika dia menuduh bosnya. Itu karena tekanan polisi. Dia sangat ketakutan saat itu. penuh dengan tekanan. Seperti pacarnya yang ketakutan atas tekanan dari pihak polisi. Sehingga dia harus bersaksi bohong bahwa amanda pada malam pembunuhan tidak bersama dia di apartemen.🙏🏻

[@Weezy.L.A]

yea she did it

[@tltaber50]

Prove it.

[@dee2973]

@ Tom Taber You'll be next saying Casey Anthony, OJ Ramsey's and The McCann's are all innocent

[@irvhh143]

@@tltaber50 did the rape occur before or after the stabbing?

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@irvhh143 After, albeit Meredith was still alive.

[@treaclebuns]

@@TheTruthCalls There was no charge of rape though was there? Irv Hh has banged on about this before . Rudy's DNA was in Meredith's vagina, that much we do know, but we don't know its origin. Yes there was presumed semen on Meredith's pillow but it was never confirmed.

[@jenifferclark279]

Wrongful conviction????🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@mytrip6991]

Yes, since her conviction was overturned per the Supreme Court.

[@levdavid2412]

Patricia Highsmith so admirably dissected these characters, she was proposed for a Nobel Price, which she emphatically turned down.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@levdavid why did she turn it down?

[@Sharon-yp4yu]

Karma will get you Ms. Knox.

[@sylvesterstewart868]

When is she going to be "canceled" for wrongly accusing a black man for murder and refusing to pay the settlement he won against her?????????

[@TheTruthCalls]

When will you catch up with the case. The ECHR has ruled her rights were violated during the coercive interrogation which resulted in her implicating Lumumba. The results of that interrogation have been nullified as a result of that ruling. Therefore she did not accuse her boss. I wonder why you aren't mentioning it was the police, based on the SMS messages they found, which believed Lumumba was involved. Why don't you question why police 'interpreter' Donnino tried to convince Amanda she had traumatic amnesia and why she suggested she try to imagine what might have happened, and how that might help her recollection. You didn't mention she repeatedly told police during the interrogation she was at Raffaele's, and it wasn't until after the SMS messages were found, and at a time when Amanda was heard to be crying out (both Raffaele and lead investigator Giobbi stated they her her screaming and crying), that Lumumba got pulled into the discussion.

[@sylvesterstewart868]

@@TheTruthCalls I listened to the interrogation tape and she wasn't being coerced, just lying as usual.

[@lesgrossman1274]

@@TheTruthCalls The ECHR ruling is under appeal and Italy will never change anything for Knox the murderer. You may leave now.

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@sylvesterstewart868 You didn't listen to the interrogation because it wasn't recorded. Either you're a blatant liar or you have no idea what you're talking about... not very good either way.

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@lesgrossman1274 Really... care to cite evidence of this? You do realize referrals to the Grand Chamber are rare, and had Italy requested such a step then there would be a record at the COE website and certainly the media would have reported on it. You are lying, once again. Oh, and she was acquitted of murder, which means you've lied twice in one sentence. About usual for you.

[@diakristy6262]

Great interview Tamron. I will definitely return. I most loved the part where your u said 'who cares? I'll just delete them!'. In my mind I have said those words to ak hundreds of times over the years. But then I am not the one in the hot seat. Thank you so much for spreading peace of mind. Love looks BEAUTIFUL on both of you. Xoxox

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Oh come on now! That's no way to talk about your friend Rudy, even if it is true. And let's not kid ourselves, it's you that can't provide a coherent narrative and timeline to implicate K&S in the murder of Meredith. Yet implicate them you do. Now that's being dim-witted don't you think?

[@PeepersT]

Parasocial relationship with a murderer. SAd.

[@yogalife365]

Amanda, the liar .. 1) Amanda and her 7 days old boyfriend were drug addicts. 2) She belonged to a broken family and behaved extremely strange at the police station by doing yoga when her friend was murdered and she was being interrogated. 3) She had found her Italian boyfriend within weeks after reaching Italy and was suspected to be a sex addict and was suspected to have had sex with multiple guys. 4) She changed her sentences and kept giving different versions of what happened making everyone wonder whats the truth.. 5) The thief still says that he is innocent and blames Amanda .. 6) Amanda DID NOT behave empathetically or like a normal person who would grieve over a death of a roommate. She did have all the ingredients that would make her a suspect brcause of het Psychopathic personality. ... TO TOP IT ALL , SHE LIED... She lied by putting the blame on her empliyer, bar owner who was ,100% innocent.. She was a liar for sure if not a murderer as she tried to defame and put the blame on her 100% innocent employer. What a horrible thing to do. I feel sorry for what happened and all the suffering but it happened because of multiple reasons. 😢

[@mytrip6991]

Let's discuss your misinformation and outright false statements: "1) Amanda and her 7 days old boyfriend were drug addicts. " Knox's and Sollecito's hair was ordered tested for narcotics upon their arrest on Nov. 6, 2007. Unlike urine and blood, hair never loses its trace of narcotics. Both tested negative for narcotics. Your claim is 100% false. "2a) She belonged to a broken family" So did Meredith. What's your point? Children of divorced parents are psycho killers? "2b)and behaved extremely strange at the police station by doing yoga when her friend was murdered and she was being interrogated." She wasn't doing yoga while being interrogated. She did it while waiting for her boyfriend while HE was being interrogated. Yep, doing yoga is the sure sign of a killer... as I note your own username! "3a) She had found her Italian boyfriend within weeks after reaching Italy... Meredith was also sleeping with an Italian guy, Giacomo Silenzi, who lived in the downstairs apartment within weeks after arriving in Italy. Does that make her a slut in your mind, too? "3b) and was suspected to be a sex addict..." No: She was being slut-shamed for doing what lots of college girls and guys do. But it's usually only the girls who get slut-shamed by people as you're doing. "3c)... and was suspected to have had sex with multiple guys." So what if she did? What does her sex life have to do with murder? But to put facts straight, she had sex with 3 guys in Italy, two of them only one time. "4) She changed her sentences and kept giving different versions of what happened making everyone wonder whats the truth.." No, she didn't. Her account before and after the illegal and coercive interrogation of Nov. 5/6 was the same. Saul Kassin, the foremost expert on false confessions, has studied her statements and concluded they were the result of a coerced interrogation: "coerced-internalized false confessions are statements made by an innocent but vulnerable person who, as a result of exposure to highly suggestive and misleading interrogation tactics, comes to believe that he or she may have committed the crime--a belief that is sometimes supplemented by false memories." KASSIN: ""This case horrifies me. I'd like to say it shocks me. But I've seen others like it," said psychologist and professor Saul Kassin, an expert on police interrogations. On his own initiative, Kassin filed a report with the Italian court on Amanda's behalf. It outlines some of the psychological reasons why Amanda could have confessed to a murder she did not commit." "I believe Amanda's confession is false. I believe Amanda is innocent," Kassin said. "If she was there...wouldn't she have known that Patrick wasn't there? Wouldn't she have known that Rudy was there? The reason she didn't know those things is that she wasn't there." (Amanda Knox: The untold story 48-hours OCTOBER 11, 2011 / 3:33 PM EDT / CBS NEWS) She retracted her statements within 24 hours. "5) The thief still says that he is innocent and blames Amanda .. " The "thief"? You mean the definitively convicted MURDERER, Rudy Guede, who has recently been arrested again for raping and beating up his ex-partner. "6) Amanda DID NOT behave empathetically or like a normal person who would grieve over a death of a roommate. She did have all the ingredients that would make her a suspect brcause of het Psychopathic personality." Thank you for your professional opinion, Doctor. So where did you get your degree in psychology or psychiatry? The University of KZbin? "TO TOP IT ALL , SHE LIED... She lied by putting the blame on her empliyer, bar owner who was ,100% innocent.. She was a liar for sure if not a murderer as she tried to defame and put the blame on her 100% innocent employer." I refer you back to my response to your #4 comment.

[@cantorcarmen]

They put that in her mouth. They forced her to say what she said.

[@tkondaks]

Her husband reminds me of all those women who visit murderers in prison and eventually marry them. You know, like the two wives of the Menendez Brothers. He should sleep with one eye open.

[@treaclebuns]

It's all just pure unrestrained vitriol with you isn't it?

[@kakejjwjshsjejjwjwjw8941]

Tony kondaks

[@kakejjwjshsjejjwjwjw8941]

Tony kondaks no

[@tkondaks]

@@lucapostorino1963 ...the Venusian has done it before and she is bound to do it again.

[@tkondaks]

@@treaclebuns Vitriol? No, I have this thing about murderers getting away with their crime.

[@myferilli]

Amanda reminds me of Madeleine MacCann’s parents. They were also suspects at a time, the UK media got involved and the UK government also, to frame the Portuguese police as inadequate. Yet, the parents always talk about themselves, what they went through, NEVER their little girl. Amanda strikes me to be similar, always talking about herself, not what Meredith must have gone through… I find it strange that she seeks the limelight and uses her miscarriage for the same end. Chrissy Teigen and Meghan Markle - two well-known narcissists have done the same with almost the exact same argument! It’s just odd that Amanda finds the most tragic, heart-wrenching experiences ‘rewarding’ and what she has ‘benefitted from’. Just very odd choice of words with her…

[@juneupton5605]

She’s guilty, do people think her husbands going to say she’s guilty. People hardly ever think about the victims family. At the end she was found guilty again of murder.

[@shiningjewel4034]

In 2015 the Italian courts overturned that conviction and she will not be re-tried.

[@dee2973]

Her husband's never gunna say this so long as the marriage is bliss. If it ends in divorce then this will guy will probably write a book as well telling all

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 How did you work that one out?!?

[@dee2973]

@ Tom Graham We'll see in a few years when the book comes out

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 You certainly know how to take wild speculation to stratospheric lengths. Best to stay in the here and now, don't you think?

[@yaffaNC-17]

I get they just got married and giddy but talking about what happened with that grin on her face. “I tend to be the kind of person that --“. How is this a rewarding experience? Such a creepy thing to say.

[@corinnabutler5270]

What's with the buttoned up collar

[@yaffaNC-17]

@@corinnabutler5270 she is socially awkward. That’s why she looked suspicious.

[@corinnabutler5270]

@@yaffaNC-17 I didn't say she looked suspicious, I don't think she looked suspicious at all, I saw someone promoting their podcast. And think her choice of clothing is ugly.

[@yaffaNC-17]

@@corinnabutler5270 I meant to the Italian authorities when they questioned. Her body language and expressions were off. It made her more suspicious.

[@noeldee9236]

He does she look so emaciated ?

[@ronemtae3468]

Because we’re too content with not telling fat people the truth

[@dr.garyhatcher8364]

Did the host forget to put on her dress?

[@nishmamanandhar1225]

STOP glorifying the life of a murderer!! She is a killer !

[@treaclebuns]

How did you work that out?

[@selenasamira3009]

You know everything Amanda you are trying so hard to be a another Person look at your clothes etc. BUT you are the girl who was with Meredith in this House!!

[@jennynewman]

I literally don't know.......

[@diakristy6262]

Start by reading 'waiting to be heard'. It's also on audio.

[@jeepgrl]

The fatal gift of beauty is a great, fact filled book on this case.

[@treaclebuns]

@@jeepgrl Agreed! Nina Burleigh is prepared to interview her sources individually before coming to her conclusions while pro-guilt sycophants like Follain simply toed the prosecution line.

[@alabama.worley]

Irrefutable PROOF of Knox' lies and involvement, directly from her own mouth! 12:10 "When I was on my way back to Raffaele's THE FIRST TIME". kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXiriICJbd2hf7c Knox has always claimed to have left Raffaele's house the morning of November 2nd to go home, take a shower, and fetch a mop. She has always claimed to have then returned to his place specifically to get him, and upon their arrival at the cottage everything commenced. Clearly, based on her own words in the footage linked above, she went to and from Raffaele's more than once that morning. This incriminating slip contradicts the narrative she has been feeding the public for over a decade, and proves that she has been lying about the most pertinent facts surrounding Meredith's death.

[@cate499]

I believe Amanda is innocent. I am a court reporter and know the justice system is not perfect. People are convicted for crimes they haven't done all the time, sadly.

[@alabama.worley]

Irrefutable PROOF of Knox' lies and involvement, directly from her own mouth! 12:10 "When I was on my way back to Raffaele's THE FIRST TIME". kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXiriICJbd2hf7c Knox has always claimed to have left Raffaele's house the morning of November 2nd to go home, take a shower, and fetch a mop. She has always claimed to have then returned to his place specifically to get him, and upon their arrival at the cottage everything commenced. Clearly, based on her own words in the footage linked above, she went to and from Raffaele's more than once that morning. This incriminating slip contradicts the narrative she has been feeding the public for over a decade, and proves that she has been lying about the most pertinent facts surrounding Meredith's death.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@cate499 just out of curiosity, which publication do you write for?

[@BobbiGail]

Wrong place, wrong time, and totally set up as a scapegoat. If you read about the evidence, there just is nothing to say she did this. Any "confession" was completely coerssed! (And she is not the first and only person to he victim of this type of interrogation.)

[@retroplank]

I I I me me me….. she gives off narcissistic Meghan Markle vibes

[@treaclebuns]

(1) In January of 2019 the European Court of human rights concluded that Amanda's human rights had been violated during her interrogation in 2 out of the 3 complaints that were evaluated. These included the failure to provide legal assistance, and the right to a fair and unbiased interpreter, that "undermined the fairness of the proceedings as a whole." This will affect Amanda's conviction of allegedly slandering Patrick Lumumba (calunnia), that Italy must redress to a point before the violations took place, which totally undermines the calunnia conviction. Italy also broke their own domestic laws in finalising the calunnia conviction. Italy has already partially complied with the judgement by paying Amanda's due compensation. At the moment Italy's action plan to resolve the calunnia is expected by the ECHR committee of Ministers. (2) Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were definitively acquitted of the murder of Meredith Kercher on On March 27, 2015 according to CPP Article 530 section 2 (acquittal) and provides the specification ("rubrica"): "per non avere i ricorrenti commesso il fatto" ("because the appellants have not committed the act") which exonerates them. The decision is final and unappealable. (3) It was considered a judicial fact that there were multiple attackers involved in the death of Meredith although only one of the seven experts who testified in court confirmed multiple attackers theory, even Dr Lalli who carried out the autopsy would not endorse the multiple attackers theory (See Massei report). Professor Norelli was the only one who argued for multiple attacker, he represented the Kercher family. (4) Rudy Guede is the only one convicted of the Murder of Meredith. Up to 14 biological traces identifying him were found in the room where Meredith was killed, while there was absolutely none for Amanda and Raffaele, nor anyone else for that matter (see Marasca-Bruno motivation report). (5) The theory of a staged break-in was crucial to the prosecutions case and considered to be a judicial fact; however, In 2015 charge (E), (as part of the murder acquittal) of simulating a break-in against Amanda and Raffaele was also annulled (the appellants did not commit the act), leaving no-one to have committed the act. (see Marasca-Bruno motivation report). (6) Earlier in the year 2007 Rudy's adoptive family (Caporalli) kicked him out because he couldn't do a day's work and was a persistent liar. (7) On October 17 2007 Rudy broke into the law premises of partners Brocchi and Palazzoli. He had disabled the alarm which would have taken some expertise, used the photocopier, then left files strewn all over the office. One of the partners Palazzoli noted that reams of paper were missing. (8) On 27th October 2007 Rudy was found having illegally entered a children's nursery in Milan, he had stolen petty cash and a kitchen knife from the premises. On his possession he had items from previous burglaries including a small hammer for breaking toughened glass, and a laptop that had been stolen from the Palazzoli-Brocchi law office in Perugia. (9) Rudy clammed up after being detained in Milan for illegally entering the nursery. A decision was taken at the Questura in Perugia advising the police in Milan to release Rudy and send him back to Perugia where no further action was taken against him. It has never been ascertained who made the decision. (10) The break-in at the cottage that Meredith and Amanda shared with two other students shared the same characteristics as the break-in at the Palazzoli-Brocchi office. On November 1st, the burglar (Rudy Guede), had climbed up using the protective grille that covered the downstairs window to gain access through the window above after using a rock to break the window. Both break-ins shared the same alleged anomaly of glass on top of clothing (see Massei report page 47). (11) Both Laura and Filomena testified in court that they had witnessed no ill-feeling between Amanda and Meredith. Marco Zaroli agreed that the relationship was "idyllic" while Meredith's boyfriend Giacomo Silenzi stated that the relationship was "tranquil between the two". (12) The Office of the Prosecuting Magistrate is responsible for the prosecution of crimes, he would be the one who ultimately decides whether detainees should be prosecuted or not. If Rudy had been arrested and charged in Perugia for his previous burglaries and taken off the streets, it is very likely that Meredith Kercher would be alive today. (13) With the worlds attention focused on the case it is clear that the Prosecuting magistrate as well as the police were in the crucible. Their protection of Rudy had now become a toxic liability to them. If it came to light that Rudy Guede was the assassin and that he had acted alone it would have resulted in international scandal and national disgrace for Italy with careers and reputations ruined. Amanda Knox and Raffaele were framed to cover-up for the criminal activities of the prosecuting Magistrate and police who had failed in their duty.

[@tkondaks]

There is more evidence -- both DNA and non-DNA -- that supports Rudy's version of events more than it does either Raffaele's or Amanda's, both of whom lied throughout the entire investigation and court preceedings (and, of course, to this day). The DNA evidence alone -- even assuming all of the other mountain of evidence against her was just a co-incidence -- was enough to convict her. As to the European's court's verdict about the violation of her rights, well, that can certainly mean her confession during the interrogation may be tossed out, but does it apply to her non-solicited written confession he voluntarily gave the police hours AFTER the first confession?

[@treaclebuns]

@@tkondaks I'll look forward to seeing your "mountain of evidence" once you get it sorted out. Please be reminded that the 1.45 statement implicating Lumumba was typed up by the cops. No handwritten original exist. All that was required was for Amanda to sign it. The Boninsegna motivation that acquitted Amanda of the slander charges filed by Mignini and other cops had to admit to the "excess of zeal and the inexcusable excesses of the investigators." Please also be reminded that the 5.45 was totally unusable. Amanda made no "confessions" as you put it.

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 I'll tell you what. If you can source a link to a hand-written copy of the 1.45 am statement you can have either a coconut or a goldfish, if you can't find the handwritten copy of the 1.45 am statement I don't want the hear from you again. Agreed? Remember this is the 1.45 am statement on 6th November 2007.

[@treaclebuns]

@@tkondaks You said "There is more evidence -- both DNA and non-DNA -- that supports Rudy's version of events more than it does either Raffaele's or Amanda's," *Yet you provide no evidence to support Rudy's innocence! You said "The DNA evidence alone -- even assuming all of the other mountain of evidence against her was just a co-incidence -- was enough to convict her." *Yet you provide no such evidence. You asked " but does it apply to her non-solicited written confession he voluntarily gave the police hours AFTER the first confession?" *"He"??? I take you are referring to Amanda's 5.45 statement which was not usable under any circumstances?

[@minhthai4915]

I don't think she killed her roomate but she's definitely not an innocent bystander. Prosecution wrongfully accused her of murder and she definitely had an unfair treatment. However, the authorities had a reason to think she was involved that I'll explain below. She had no solid aliby and both her and boyfriend were constantly changing and contradicting each other. Her boyfriend even admitted that he lied during his interrogation... There's legitimate proof that the murder scene was partially cleaned. (luminol footprints matching Amanda foot size and SHAPE in the hallway but more importantly lack of other bloody footprints in the bathroom except for Rudy's one imprinted on the bath mat). But there's was another luminol stain with Amanda's DNA and Meredith's blood mixed together in their roommate's room...The same room where the break-in supposedly occured. The room was ransacked but nothing of value was stolen and the broken glass was on top of the roommate's belongings. The chance of having both of their DNA mixed together and the presence of Meredith's blood in their roommate's room is rather low/near impossible. Therefore proving Amanda staged the break-in. These are concrete facts but unfortunately doesn't prove that she committed murder. That's why she was acquitted but that doesn't mean she wasn't involved.

[@dappydep]

Don't forget she tried to pin it on Patrick Lumumba and did nothing to reverse the accusation,willing to let him rot in jail...for life? Luckily after 2 weeks Patrick Lumumba was able to provide the alibi.

[@bl4841]

they are dressed so creepy

[@Nusja]

She’s grown a lot? Were the previous interviews with her even more boring than this?

[@jakeblack7784]

I would never be asleep around Amanda Knox. The person that supposedly killed her room mate will talk. It seems to be a group effort and sex played a role. The next morning Amanda looked drugged up with her boyfriend; lied to authorities repeatedly; and showed no concern for her murdered roommate. She is lucky to be free.

[@noeldee9236]

Wow ok ! Why would show concern for someone you barely knew ?

[@auditingbelfast]

I would never be asleep around corrupt Italian cops who abuse process, mentally torture and falsely accuse innocent people. I would never be asleep around any cops for that matter. Police are psychopaths and the courts are a media circus joke. RIP Meredith Kercher. Amanda Knox should be paid millions in compensation from the Italian government.

[@3passionflower]

actually i tend to think she is innocent myself

[@A.F.U-A]

You seem to live in an alternate reality.

[@finnjones9979]

She wasn't wrongfully convicted...not being found guilty is not the same as being found innocent. She creeps me out

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@FinnJones - you’re right about one thing: a person’s actual guilt or innocence isn’t based upon what a court says. Guilt or innocence can only be proven through evidence. And in this case, the evidence pointed to Rudy Guede as the sole killer

[@lesgrossman1274]

Amanda Knox should have been sentenced for many more years than the four that she ended up serving in prison. Her felony conviction for accusing Patrick Lumumba will remain etched in stone forevermore. She also should be serving time for her murder of Meredith Kercher as the Italian Supreme Court contravened articles 617 & 628 of their own judicial code to illegally acquit Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. RIP Meredith.

[@TheTruthCalls]

Yo knucklehead, perhaps you haven't heard the ECHR ruled the interrogation violated her rights and therefore the statements which came from it are nullified. Ergo, the calunia charge has no basis and when Italy finally gets around to responding to the ECHR on how it will resolve this I would expect the calunia conviction to be overturned and the charge dismissed. As for the acquittal, perhaps you should contact Italian authorities if you think the Supreme Court did something illegal in acquitting Amanda and Raffaele. It's interesting how a few people, such as yourself, who have repeatedly proven themselves to be several cards short of a full deck, claim something illegal was done *by the Supreme Court regarding the most controversial, high profile case Italy has ever known* six years ago and yet no issue was ever raised by anyone in Italy who understands the country's laws.

[@lesgrossman1274]

@@TheTruthCalls Nothing has been changed. Amanda Knox is a convicted felon who should still be in prison. You may leave now.

[@lesgrossman1274]

@@TheTruthCalls In the final Supreme Court report of the case against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, the court found the following: * Knox was present at the cottage during the murder and washed the victim's blood off of her hands * Knox and Sollecito had no alibis for the night of the murder * Knox is a convicted liar who rightly spent four years in prison * Knox heard Meredith scream when she was murdered * Rudy Guede did not act alone * Rudy Guede did not hold a knife * Strong suspicion that Sollecito was at the cottage with Knox during the murder * There was a spot mixed with the victim's blood and Knox's DNA found in the bathroom * The crime scene was staged * Knox was aware of the sexual aspect of the crime before it could be determined by the police * There was no evidence of coercion by the police when Knox accused Lumumba of murder * Knox's motive for falsely accusing Lumumba for murder was to cover up for Rudy Guede * Knox's felony conviction won't be affected in any way if the ECHR finds any human rights violations * Rudy Guede has less motive than Knox to commit crime

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@lesgrossman1274 Stop being an idiot... she is NOT a convicted felon. If she was, she wouldn't be traveling internationally, she wouldn't even be allowed to vote.

[@lesgrossman1274]

@@TheTruthCalls In the final Supreme Court report of the case against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, the court found the following: * Knox was present at the cottage during the murder and washed the victim's blood off of her hands * Knox and Sollecito had no alibis for the night of the murder * Knox is a convicted liar who rightly spent four years in prison * Knox heard Meredith scream when she was murdered * Rudy Guede did not act alone * Rudy Guede did not hold a knife * Strong suspicion that Sollecito was at the cottage with Knox during the murder * There was a spot mixed with the victim's blood and Knox's DNA found in the bathroom * The crime scene was staged * Knox was aware of the sexual aspect of the crime before it could be determined by the police * There was no evidence of coercion by the police when Knox accused Lumumba of murder * Knox's motive for falsely accusing Lumumba for murder was to cover up for Rudy Guede * Knox's felony conviction won't be affected in any way if the ECHR finds any human rights violations * Rudy Guede has less motive than Knox to commit crime

[@michaeljones1886]

This so reminds me of Jon bennet Ramsay murder where the brother was questioned and he smiled all through it…I know that doesn’t make them guilty but you have to admit it’s a strange vibes giving off….

[@retroplank]

She seems way more guilty than the brother.. she seems off

[@mikefranky]

@@retroplank....Fully agree with you something not right with her.

[@retroplank]

@@mikefranky actually something seems a little off about him too.

[@mikefranky]

@@retroplank ....He didn't Google her name why would he think he have too..🤷‍♂️

[@retroplank]

@@mikefranky are you serious

[@TALK105]

They made a ritual sacrifice that is all.

[@levdavid2412]

A true confession at last "I greatly benefited from this experience."

[@alyssamoreno2760]

Does your arm hurt from that reach?

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@LevDavid Dostoevsky said he thanked God for the years he spent in a Siberian gulag. He said the experienced purified his soul.

[@levdavid2412]

@@TheWchurchill4pm There is a difference, Dostoevsky didn't murder anybody.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@levdavid neither did Amanda.

[@tonywelsh3709]

How did she know Meredith had her throat slit i.e. she admitted this to Meredith's friends & her flatmates when the police didn't even know the cause of death. Plus she admitted in the first trail no kitchen utensils had been taken too or from her house to her boyfriends, in order words, how did the victims (Meredith) & your DNA ned up on the exact same knife? She must have changed her story over 10 times about where she was on the night of the murder but her telephone & laptop records say otherwise. her blood along with the victim on taps, light switches, the bidet etc etc Plus the hard driver in hers & her boyfriend's laptop were removed from the actual laptop-bizarre. Eye witnesses saw her in the morning of 2nd Nov 2007 & the night before when she was supposed to be in bed. Honestly, it goes on & on & on & on & OJ Simpson style on & on....

[@lanapriyatno5890]

I don't believe her. She is guilty

[@mytrip6991]

Guilty based on what? Not that I expect an answer.

[@lanapriyatno5890]

@@mytrip6991 look at her body language. The way she speaks. She is guilty.

[@mytrip6991]

@@lanapriyatno5890 Body language is not a science; it's pseudoscience. It is highly subjective and prone to confirmation bias. This has been proven is studies. That's why it is not allowed in court as evidence. Body language is not evidence. In this case, there was no evidence of Knox or Sollecito in Kercher's bedroom which the Supreme Court rightly found to be impossible if they had participated in the murder. Rudy Guede left multiple samples of DNA on clothes, her purse and in her body. He left his bloody fingerprints under her body and his bloody footprints all around her body. Knox and Sollecito left none of that.

[@ninguno141]

@@mytrip6991 Knox and Sollecito left so much forensic evidence according to the Italian Court. They were convicted twice. She could be rotten in prison if not for the money and the fabulous PR machinery her family moved forward. Her blood was mixed with Meredith’s blood in several places of the flat, and her statements all were a bunch of lies.

[@mytrip6991]

@@ninguno141 LOL! And they were ACQUITTED TWICE! Again with the " Her blood was mixed with Meredith’s blood in several places of the flat" lie. I've quoted and cited for you straight from the court records MULTIPLE TIMES that her BLOOD was never found mixed with Meredith's blood anywhere in the apartment. The prosecution claimed that but NOT ONCE DID THEY PROVIDE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF THAT. It was always referred to has her "DNA or biological substance" by the courts which could be any DNA from any part of her body including skin cells, buccal cells, saliva, etc. But as usual, you just ignore it because you don't WANT the TRUTH, you only want your OPINION confirmed so you can continue spewing your hatred. Another of your UNFOUNDED WITH ANY EVIDENCE LIES: that she was acquitted due to "the money and the fabulous PR machinery". Money and a PR machine didn't change the damn EVIDENCE.

[@foxiefrankie7886]

This won't last

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@Foxie they have a baby now

[@sabrinatwigg1966]

She is working hard to control what other's think of her. She has always been concerned about her image. Amanda killed Meridith because Meridith and her friends didn't like her. She approached Kercher with the intent of mocking Meridith of being a "goody two shoes". I truly believe this is the motivation for the killing. My strong opinion, of course.

[@bobbyfuller3118]

Knox has been described as a narcissistic psychopath with an extreme Borderline personality disorder. A hand written note was stuck to the entrance of Meredith's University, which Knox was not bright enough to attend, which was nasty and made out it was a rent add for a foreign student, female, wants a room close by to her Uni, and gave the date of her death as the phone number to call. Being that Knox is totally mad, she wrote it. An extremely twin personality person with extreme jealousy and uneven temperament.

[@dee2973]

What I don't get with people like AK, OJ, The McCann's and Chris Watts mother Cindy is that all these people are all about endless PR and NEVER EVER place empathy towards the victims.

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 More association fallacy. Is that all you've got?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Why should Amanda show regret for actions that she isn't responsible for? How did she bully and harass her parents (both of whom are dead)? Oh, now it's BPD! Who's diagnosis was that?

[@TroenderTass]

@@lucapostorino1963 Why would she have any regret? She hardly knew her, and she probably didn't kill her. This amanda knox hate is so absurd. All of you are just latching on to a sucpicsion that never led to anything. What are you even on about. The girl is most likely innocent. No motive, no evidence pointing to her involvement, potential alibi. Amanda is just a walking symbol of how a witch hunt will never stop if you are being accused of something that you can't disprove.

[@TuesdayMoney]

If you could turn back time, would you have not killed Meredith?

[@mytrip6991]

If you could turn back time, would you educate yourself on the facts of the case before posting? For example, can you tell us exactly what evidence places Knox in Kercher's bedroom. What evidence places her in the cottage that night at all? Go on, tell us.

[@TuesdayMoney]

@@mytrip6991 Guess you should ask yourself that question.

[@mytrip6991]

@@TuesdayMoney I know this case because I've studied the court records. So why not answer my question? Tell us exactly what evidence places Knox in Kercher's bedroom? What evidence places her in the cottage that night at all? Go on, tell us. If you can't then just admit you can't.

[@mytrip6991]

@@TuesdayMoney An hour later and no reply. Color me shocked. Not.

[@TuesdayMoney]

@mytrip6991 Holy sh!t! You Knox sycophants are so weird. You comment some garbage. I respond, and then you delete your original comment and get all upset and claim I didn't respond after an hour?? What strange world you live in. You should seek some help for your hybristopilia.

[@sloz6781]

shes all fake...stop playing the innocent catholic sweet grrl!! lmao

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

When she went to Catholic school, she had to write an essay on why she believed in God. As an atheist (her parents sent her there because of the quality of its education) she didn’t believe in God. So she wrote an essay explaining why God doesn’t exist. For that reason alone, she had to retake the class in summer school.

[@lesgrossman1274]

In the final Supreme Court report of the case against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, the court found the following: * Knox was present at the cottage during the murder and washed the victim's blood off of her hands * Knox and Sollecito had no alibis for the night of the murder * Knox is a convicted liar who rightly spent four years in prison * Knox heard Meredith scream when she was murdered * Rudy Guede did not act alone * Rudy Guede did not hold a knife * Strong suspicion that Sollecito was at the cottage with Knox during the murder * There was a spot mixed with the victim's blood and Knox's DNA found in the bathroom * The crime scene was staged * Knox was aware of the sexual aspect of the crime before it could be determined by the police * There was no evidence of coercion by the police when Knox accused Lumumba of murder * Knox's motive for falsely accusing Lumumba for murder was to cover up for Rudy Guede * Knox's felony conviction won't be affected in any way if the ECHR finds any human rights violations * Rudy Guede has less motive than Knox to commit crime

[@GARYBRUNDAGEMUSIC]

Yup she is as guilty as oj Simpson.

[@mokahgirl5165]

@@GARYBRUNDAGEMUSIC And as guilty as Carolyn Bryant #EmitTill

[@rogershuttleworth7669]

On March 27, 2015, the ultimate appeal by Knox and Sollecito was heard by the Supreme Court of Cassation; it ruled that the case was without foundation, thereby definitively acquitting them of the murder. Her defamation conviction was upheld but the three-year sentence was deemed served by the time she had already spent in prison.[72][137][138][139] Rather than merely declaring that there were errors in the earlier court cases or that there was not enough evidence to convict, the court ruled that Knox and Sollecito were innocent of involvement in the murder.[140] On September 7, 2015, the Court published the report on the acquittal, citing "glaring errors", "investigative amnesia", and "guilty omissions", where a five-judge panel said that the prosecutors who won the original murder conviction failed to prove a "whole truth" to back up the scenario that Knox and Sollecito killed Kercher.[141] They also stated that there were "sensational failures" (clamorose defaillance) in the investigation, and that the lower court had been guilty of "culpable omissions" (colpevoli omissioni) in ignoring expert testimony that demonstrated contamination of evidence.[142] The delegate supreme judge, court adviser Gennaro Marasca, made public the reasons of absolution. First, none of the evidence demonstrated that either Knox or Sollecito was present at the crime scene. Second, they cannot have "materially participated in the homicide", since absolutely no "biological traces ... could be attributed to them in the room of the murder or on the body of the victim, where in contrast numerous traces were found attributable to Guede".

[@elisabethelias681]

I personally think she's guilty. Guilty af

[@fellerrionmarchelum9]

u can't just say everybody guilty just because you are ugly, u know..

[@Decode-jc8rn]

So you think she slashed a woman with numerous stabbings and left none of her DNA in the room or on Meredith and had none of the usual cuts on her hands from the knife slipping when a person stabs someone numerous times.

[@NFLjunk79]

@@fellerrionmarchelum9 Ah, that's why you never look into a mirror.Because of the ugliness thats staring back at you.

[@kq1777]

There would have been stronger evidence at the crime scene if she was guilty of murder. Its more plausible that she was involved post crime of clean up, staged breakin, etc..the prosecution should have tried her for accomplice or some such else not murder directly and I'm quite sure the supreme court would have nailed her and her bf at the time for that..instead, the prosecution went after her for murder in cold blood, and there was no smoking gun evidence to support that.

[@Truthspeakeralways]

Veryy

[@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg]

I’d want an escape room if I had to live with that creature.

[@treaclebuns]

There it is AGAIN! The primeval witch hunt hits the fan. No understanding of the case, just a self-serving, purgative need to cleanse your soul of your own past misdeeds through the caricature of Amanda Knox. Do you think we're we all so stupid that we can't see you for what you are?

[@darshanchung]

What do you mean?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Yet you continue to assert guilt with no narrative and timeline to make sense of it. I've asked you to make sense of the lies you label me with to no response. I've asked you for six reasons that would implicate K&S in the murder of Meredith to zero response. All you have is a rag-bag of lies, half-truths and factoids that have no chance of closing the case.

[@chrislim7615]

Wow l think he really loves her very much,good on her(hope she would)learn 2choose her friend's wisely fr now onwards!God bless;)*!!!

[@ninguno141]

She looks like she's never broken a plate in her life, lol

[@walidbrahim7019]

All these years Still don't believe she is innocent

[@swim4fun2000]

Ok......wtf is she wearing? Overkill trying to be conservative AF! You know she doesn’t dress like that normally! I think she did it!

[@dee2973]

@Jackie G She's trying to disarm the doubters by dressing homely like a Grandma when really she is the big bad wolf.

[@paintthesky3770]

Lizzie borden vibes

[@presidentofnothing]

She did! Good eye hiddenswan

[@heidikessler6832]

Huh? Y'all are deciding that she's guilty because of what she wears?

[@dee2973]

@ HiddenSwan Of course she did it!

[@Humbirdhippo5475]

Glad she found happiness after living such a nightmare. Thanks for having her, Tamron!

[@dee2973]

@ Deb Solis She's alive though yeah. Who speaks for the most important person, the victim? I doubt you even know her name now do you?

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@dee2973 Anytime you wish to discuss Meredith Kercher you just go right ahead. However, this video is about Amanda and her life after her acquittal. Pay attention.

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 What are your considerations on John Kercher's book "Meredith"?

[@presidentofnothing]

After murdering someone

[@treaclebuns]

@@presidentofnothing Who?

[@nishmamanandhar1225]

There is a puzzle n games in Amanda Knox wedding . Seriously , Amanda are you not tired of the puzzles u left in Italy ? What a dumb man not go Google her murderer girlfriend? nobody believes Amanda Knox. It is unjust to family of Meridith . Shane on this channel ...yes !! RIP Meredith. My heart goes for the victim's family . Much love from nepal

[@dee2973]

You even said it "the victims family" that is what is the problem here is that the memory of the most important person Meredith Kercher has been forgotten. It's been hijacked by AK and this is why very few people will ever believe her. She has no empathy towards Meredith whatsoever and using this platform as a perverse sense of PR . Trying to dress up as friendly Granny and cooking, normality. It's vanity to the Extreme. She is NOT the victim, but was quite happy to falsely accuse others. And WTF laughs in court in a foreign country when accused of murder

[@treaclebuns]

@@dee2973 You said " She is NOT the victim, but was quite happy to falsely accuse others. And WTF laughs in court in a foreign country when accused of murder." When did she do any of that? Please cite. You said "the victims family" that is what is the problem here is that the memory of the most important person Meredith Kercher has been forgotten" I asked you what your considerations are on John Kercher's book "Meredith". Have you read it, or have you too forgotten the victim?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 If she was cheerful and smiling she probably thought that her innocence would protect her.

[@TheWchurchill4pm]

@Luca Posterino she was smiling at her family who were sitting in the gallery

[@oliviamollatz2227]

She's giving me Jodi Arias vibes

[@tkondaks]

The mixed DNA evidence alone was enough to convict her. And of course there is a mountain of evidence against her at every twist and turn of this case. But forget the overwhelming evidence against her. Even assuming all of that evidence was coincidental, Amanda still stands guilty of the crime of calumnia, which is the Italian crime of slandering an innocent person. Amanda told the police that an innocent person -- Patrick Lumumba -- did the crime and he rotted in prison for two weeks until an air tight alibi surfaced for him. When the first court of appeal reversed her guilty verdict it also declared that the four years she spent in prison was deemed time served for this crime. If Patrick's alibi didn't surface, he would still be rotting in prison today. But even forget all that. The family of Meredith Kercher -- the victim -- have pleaded with Amanda for the past 10 years to, please, not talk about the case and appear in public because of the pain she causes them. No, Amanda has never met a microphone or camera she doesn't like. She purposely puts herself forward in the public eye and continues, at every opportunity, to cause the Kercher family pain.

[@treaclebuns]

You said "The mixed DNA evidence alone was enough to convict her." The DNA evidence against her doesn't exist except in your hallucinogenic mindset. See section 8.1. of Marasca-Bruno. You said "But forget the overwhelming evidence against her" Yet you provide no such evidence for anyone to forget. The real truth about Lumumba is that the cops had no reason to hold him probably beyond the 6th of November and certainly by the 8th. Amanda had retracted her witness testimony on the 7th and it would have clear that the DNA from the cheek swabs taken from Lumumba did not match the DNA from the "unknown male" found in Meredith's vagina. So regardless of whoever the "unknown male was it certainly wasn't Lumumba. The cops should have released him at that point and regarded Amanda's retraction of her 1.45 witness testimony as valid. The fact that the cops let him languish in the cells for two weeks needs their explanation NOT Amanda's, nor anyone else's for that matter. If Lumumba was still "rotting in prison today" as you claim it would be as a result of investigative thuggery and prosecutorial criminality, nothing less. Amanda Knox was banged up in prison for 4 years for crimes she did not commit. On the 24th January the ECtHR ruled that her rights were violated in multiple instances during her interrogation. These violations totally "undermined the proceedings as a whole" of both the murder and calunnia charges against her. Amanda has now more right than ever to tell the world of her miscarriage of justice so that others don't suffer the same fate. Only a psychopath would argue otherwise.

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Yes Amanda's DNA did exist as a result of co-habitation. No incriminating DNA traces were found...ANYWHERE!

[@DeladisKythera]

The police beat and bullied and coerced her to blame Patrick Lamumba

[@DeladisKythera]

I don't think that there is anything wrong with her being in public proclaiming her innocence and doing Wrongful Conviction work, so long as people continue to vilify and demonise her all the time, which they do. If Rudy Guede finally admitted to his crime and gave the Kercher family closure, they may not see her public profile as so connected to the murder.

[@SinisterScoundrel6562]

I doubt she'll ever go back to Italy for any reason.

[@kapilair1770]

She will never

[@pollyannaprinciple5860]

Amanda has matured so much. She did a good job with this interview. Nice to see her move forward with her life, get married and start family.

[@rebelraccoon9018]

Amanda hasn't matured in the slightest. She just got older. My sympathy lies with Meredith. She never got the chance to marry and have kids.

[@creativeminds5405]

@@rebelraccoon9018 And that is not Amandas fault at all. So she should move on. If someone gets killed in your neighborhood you wouldnt rly care and move on with your normal life. Amanda has been through hell bcoz of sth she never did.

[@creativeminds5405]

@The hand Facts prove her innocent. It is only your guess. DNA in a house where you live and constantly go in and out is not suspicious. DNA can be transferred so easily.

[@yahainHotPink]

This was a good interview. I believe in her innocence.

[@bobbyfuller3118]

Fooled again. Do your research

[@treaclebuns]

@@bobbyfuller3118 What does your research tell you?

[@presidentofnothing]

@@treaclebuns that she killed Meredith and is using it to make a living.

[@treaclebuns]

@@presidentofnothing Really?! How did you work that out?

[@tkondaks]

Respectfully, as bobby fuller wrote, do your research. There is a mountain of evidence supporting her guilt.

[@mytrip6991]

The lack of knowing the actual facts of this case is glaringly apparent by most of these ignorant comments. They are mostly just personal attacks based on that ignorance. If all the supposed evidence against Knox and Sollecito that you read in these comments were true, the Supreme Court would not have acquitted them. In fact, the five SC judges found that: "10. The intrinsic contradictory nature of the evidence, emerging from the text of the appealed verdict, in essence undermines the connective tissue of the same, leading to its annulment. In fact, in the presence of a scenario marked by many contradictions, the referral judge should not have come to a verdict of guilt, but - as previously observed - should have reached a verdict of not guilty, given Article 530, section 2, Italian Code of Criminal Procedure. "

[@danilopadilha5915]

so lovely, so much joy next to her cute husband ....no memory or blame regarding the awful murder of Meredith....inhumane!

[@joannaj74]

So good to see her enjoying a normal life again. Best of fortune to her and her husband and their future together😊

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Then the thugs in uniforms that framed K&S and the criminals in robes that prosecuted them must be the luckiest men (and women) alive, don't you think?

[@treaclebuns]

@@lucapostorino1963 Yet you're the one who want's to implicate 2 innocents in a crime for no particular reason.

[@a.serguiev2668]

@@lucapostorino1963 ou alors "La mauvaise herbe ne meurt jamais".....

[@stone.orlanski2728]

@@a.serguiev2668 C'est dégoûtant elle est coupable ! J'espère néanmoins quelle pourra vivre avec ça toute sa vie ! C'est juste un psychopathe . C'est terrible

[@trishacobb1347]

So glad to see you home

[@007nadineL]

Why is hostess on camera wearing lingerie? Unprofessional

[@chrispaws9294]

he's either very brave or very stupid

[@deathlarsen7502]

they have a podcast? who listens to ALL these podcasts???

[@Swanwoods4]

Gross 🤮

[@mjoomj]

"Greatly benefited from experience...." And made money out of the murder of an innocent woman.

[@fruff30]

Sadly your right. It pains me to know that this woman gets to get married, have children and monetarily benefit from Meredith's murder (all these years later) while Meredith will never have the opportunity to have a family of her own. Where is Karma when you need it?

[@alabama.worley]

@@fruff30 Irrefutable PROOF of Knox' lies and involvement, directly from her own mouth! 12:10 "When I was on my way back to Raffaele's THE FIRST TIME". kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXiriICJbd2hf7c Knox has always claimed to have left Raffaele's house the morning of November 2nd to go home, take a shower, and fetch a mop. She has always claimed to have then returned to his place specifically to get him, and upon their arrival at the cottage everything commenced. Clearly, based on her own words in the footage linked above, she went to and from Raffaele's more than once that morning. This incriminating slip contradicts the narrative she has been feeding the public for over a decade, and proves that she has been lying about the most pertinent facts surrounding Meredith's death.

[@alabama.worley]

Irrefutable PROOF of Knox' lies and involvement, directly from her own mouth! 12:10 "When I was on my way back to Raffaele's THE FIRST TIME". kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXiriICJbd2hf7c Knox has always claimed to have left Raffaele's house the morning of November 2nd to go home, take a shower, and fetch a mop. She has always claimed to have then returned to his place specifically to get him, and upon their arrival at the cottage everything commenced. Clearly, based on her own words in the footage linked above, she went to and from Raffaele's more than once that morning. This incriminating slip contradicts the narrative she has been feeding the public for over a decade, and proves that she has been lying about the most pertinent facts surrounding Meredith's death.

[@ArtJorgeCom]

those who believe she is innocent must be american naives

[@dqreps]

Or just smarter than you (・o・)

[@alabama.worley]

@@dqreps Irrefutable PROOF of Knox' lies and involvement, directly from her own mouth! 12:10 "When I was on my way back to Raffaele's THE FIRST TIME". kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXiriICJbd2hf7c Knox has always claimed to have left Raffaele's house the morning of November 2nd to go home, take a shower, and fetch a mop. She has always claimed to have then returned to his place specifically to get him, and upon their arrival at the cottage everything commenced. Clearly, based on her own words in the footage linked above, she went to and from Raffaele's more than once that morning. This incriminating slip contradicts the narrative she has been feeding the public for over a decade, and proves that she has been lying about the most pertinent facts surrounding Meredith's death.

[@dqreps]

@@alabama.worley everyone lies... Everyone. That doesn't mean they are in on a murderer though.

[@alabama.worley]

@@dqreps Typically, when an individual is lying specifically in response to a murder they've been implicated and charged in, their purpose for lying serves to conceal involvement and/or guilty knowledge of said crime(s). Not everyone who lies was twice convicted of homicide, and convicted of maliciously attempting to frame an innocent man. These are two entirely unrelatable comparisons.

[@dqreps]

@@alabama.worley nah, ppl lie for all kinds of reasons, ie embarrassment, shame, cheating etc. I've been a fugitive recovery for 20 years. I question lots of people. I'm not sure what Criminal Division you belong too but these things do indeed happen even if it doesn't make sense to civilians that do not deal with this on daily basis. Ever hear people admitting to a crime they didn't commit? Happens every day. People do crazy shite. The bottom line is there's no proof she was involved in the murder.

[@mjoomj]

A glorified murderer.. criminal justice advocate?! More like a murderer helping fellow friends.

[@PerfectaRhyme]

Wow i never knew a killer lady could look so innocent and smile. I wonder how she'll kill this guy next to her. Maybe a Cookout or something. 😆

[@dee2973]

They'll divorce and he'll write a book

[@devangreedier1539]

Ok listen. The italian police did not do their job property. Lied to this women telling her she had aids. If the police telling her lies and not collecting or testing evidence properly. Like doesn't that scream red flags on their side? Personally I don't think she murdered Meredith however we will never really know the truth. But yeah :) carry on 🥴

[@dee2973]

@Devan Greedier All those folk who says she's innocent only do so because she's a white all American girl next door. Had it been she the victim and Meredith writing books , they'd all be saying guilt and if AK was African American she would still be incarcerated and white America wouldn't give a fuck. Now look at this woman here she's trying to act like Grandma when she really is the big bad wolf

[@TheTruthCalls]

@@dee2973 Please stop with the ignorant comments. I say she AND Raffaele are innocent because I have spent years reviewing ALL of the evidence and there is nothing that connects them to the crime. No motive, no evidence... the only reason you keep claiming she's guilty is because you've been duped by haters and idiots like grossman. Can you cite the evidence that has led you to believe she is guilty? Real case evidence.

[@devangreedier1539]

@@dee2973 bro you don't know me 😂 she could be black, asian, hispanic, I don't give a fuuuuck. I would still be here saying the same damn thin. The italian police didn't do their job correctly, and thats it. There's also a bunch of corruption out there even here in America there's police who done the same damn thing. So de I'm sorry you don't see my point of view. And honestly you dont have too. Its a agree to disagree. However if you want my number so we can talk in person about the issue we sure can ;)