Tardis Materialisation With moving Camera No CG

spent the day filming some prodct shots for work with the marvelous Edelkrone motion control camera slider and I could resist doing this shot. just 2 identical takes faded together

[@danton8302]

How did you materialise the tardis w/out cg?

[@Cyberrob]

anti - normal disestablishment so the slide track is programmed to repeat the same shot again and again and again so I filmed it once without the model and again with the model and cross faded the two clips together ie not computer generated

[@kitbrown3895]

anti - normal disestablishment same way all the different elements were combined in the same movement in films like star wars,star trek and bladerunner

[@DoctorJ3kyll]

Although it would be a lot harder to generate the shot without the use of a computer for the slider, editor and camera. ;-)

[@garoo1980]

@@Cyberrob Love this. Just like the old days!

[@mariamarkus5617]

@@Cyberrob yeah it was obvious

[@timeywimeybrony]

WHOA!! THIS IS GREAT! I'm gonna try this once I find a good stable camera slider thing

[@SteveWhite1970]

Power controlled slider, perhaps?

[@KapybaraKSP]

I love it when people are like "THIS USES CG" not realising that CGI and VFX are different lmao

[@RabbiB0Y]

Cgi is form of VFX, this shot along with all tardis demat and materlizing shots are just normal compositing in short no vfx are not different than CGI composing and CGI are however which is what this js

[@KapybaraKSP]

@@RabbiB0Y I meant to specify that CGI and **general** VFX are different,not at least something along those lines is what I was trying to do 😂 I’m not super wise with the terms, but people always assume everything is “CGI” even though that’s not what you call half these bloody things 😂

[@LorvinWolf]

AH CRAP, Forgot to recalibrate Size regulators, really should fix them tomorow. well, a rather tiny adventure this time.

[@Dwightbrown2003]

That's way too good to be cg and the fact that the mirror in the back even looked like it actually materialized I guess the doctor messed up the tardis again

[@SouthPark333Gaming]

That is amazing!

[@LUN4RM00NS]

He faded anither vid with a vid

[@UNIVERSE_X_STUDIOS]

It looks so cinematic! Great job!

[@leonwilson1089]

👍

[@dingowarrior815]

"What is this? A Tardis for ants?" XD

[@mariamarkus5617]

It’s got to be bigger on the inside

[@dingowarrior815]

@@mariamarkus5617 just as it was in the episode

[@mariamarkus5617]

@@dingowarrior815 yeah i was about to say that .... can you imagine one day you find a small tardis and BOOM. You help the doctor and become a hero 😭❤️

[@ricsanta1]

@@mariamarkus5617 like in flatline where the tardis shrinks

[@kitbrown3895]

looks fantastic!

[@HarryRobins]

wow. I love it!

[@williamg209two]

easy, you film the same shot twice, one without tardis and one with, i mean they used to do that in classic who....

[@Cyberrob]

very few instances where they did it with a motion control rig though, that was the point.

[@williamg209two]

@@Cyberrob Well yes i feel such a rig wasn't really possible at the time but I believe in the 80s they manged to do what you did with a moving camera

[@Cyberrob]

@@williamg209two from memory melgos used a motion rig for model shots and trial of a timelord used one for the space station shots but i cant recall a shot where the camera moved while the tardis materialized

[@williamg209two]

@@Cyberrob maybe I'm thinking of background characters, I watched a vid on it the other day explaining the history of how they achieved the shot

[@Doctormario4600]

I don't remember them ever doing this in the classic series.

[@Thunderson-nr2eg]

This is absolutely incredible my dude well done

[@Doctormario4600]

I really like that model

[@Doctormario4600]

Which model of the TARDIS do you have & where can I find it

[@DucksFor4]

B&M It’s the 4th doctors shade tardis? Maybe could be something different.

[@gabrielfsilva6979]

Huh 😳 Omg

[@CKR2303]

Materialisation was a tad bit too fast

[@Alectron8]

I would like to see you replicate it

[@CKR2303]

@@Alectron8 same with you

[@Alectron8]

@@CKR2303 ok hold on give me a few hour I will wip something up

[@Alectron8]

@@CKR2303 but that's not the point, you were the one who dissed it when you probably couldn't recreate it

[@CKR2303]

@@Alectron8 I didnt say it was bad xD