Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet

Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet explained by Kent Lennartsson - Research Manager & Founder - Kvaser AB

[@kesicicutter]

perfect explanation, thanks for video.

[@juspetful]

Since the video TSN ethernet has emerged and it provides realtime and safety capabilities beyond CAN. Plus the higher bandwidth, flexibility and co-existence of best effort and realtime messages

[@manikandanj1233]

Hi sir.. Nice explanation :) very informative video

[@user_uif_ghg_wer_das]

From scope looks the header of the CAN FD has the standard bit rate but the payload has higher bit rate.

[@alokpradhan9523]

Best explanation

[@bennguyen1313]

Very Clear!

[@batho-peleinnovations172]

DOES CAN HAVE I.P ADDRESS?

[@BoBaH_BoBaHoB]

No. All traffic is broadcasted.

[@simonbyholm7460]

Messages in CAN have an ID identifying the contents/meaning of the message in the contol system. In some higher layer protocols, like J1939, the ID may also identify both the sender and the intended recipient of the message.

[@rafraph_0]

@Tomás Franco acctually i cant explain why, but its many different. in CAN bus there isnt master and slave for exemple

[@sriyapradhan2692]

@Tom Franco CAN basically relies on arbitration ID, whereas I2C has slave ID and then comes the data or the message