Tenet airport sequence INVERTED / SYNCED UP

[@TalkingBook72]

The editor of this movie definitely went to therapy for months after working on this movie

[@paulhorneschillings1212]

The editor came to therapy feeling good, then left feeling worse

[@muh.suudcandra5231]

Lmaoo i see what u did there

[@paulgerhard5170]

most amazing is that she was a newbee when it comes to action scenes

[@andy4373]

Definitely went to therapy. Therapy to went definitely

[@Kinyoshida]

Need inverted therapy to undo the inverted

[@vaughnordakowski8774]

The hardest part was trying to understand who's will was being enforced for certain movements and it makes so much more sense seeing both the inverted and non-inverted fights now

[@kirbyis4ever]

If "What's happened has happened" then that means you're always working with a dominant effect and the cause has to be made to meet it. Inverted people and objects are against the stream and forced to make "causes" for everything that has happened (effect). Inverted protagonist is always working with effects and instinctively makes a cause - he shoots when protag dodges, he gets hurt when protag attacks, and lands attacks when protag gets hit. It *already happened* so he's filling in the gap.

[@Cyynapse]

my man literally blocked a fight scene to work both forwards and backwards

[@Novarya]

Nolan is the man!

[@200_cuentos]

lol after watching inversed i finally understand that he was blown away BY ACCIDENT

[@DamianWayne-dm3ju]

took me a while to realize he was actually “blown” in (out from the forward perspective) by the “after”-shock of the explosion (which from his inverted POV happens first before the actual explosion) and not “sucked” out by the suction if the jet engine… *phewph*

[@thuglord1231]

And had forced to fight his own self .... Used turnstile and there were 3 protagonists ...😅

[@J_C_CH]

So there's basically three different versions of Protagonist and Neil in this scene. There's past Protagonist and Neil who are going forward, then there's future Protagonist and Neil who are inverted, and then finally there's future Protagonist and Neil who are going forward as well. I've only just picked up on that.

[@Humulator]

and if you count people not here, there 5 protagainst.

[@angeleflett4641]

@@Humulator how? I heard Niel was in reverse time for 10 years

[@Humulator]

@@angeleflett4641 forward origanal, inverted first time, then univerted, then reinveted to go to to war thing, then univert

[@poritime74]

6:05 THAT INVERTED WALK XDDD

[@унштерн]

LOL

[@Ze9zz]

Excellent work man! You nailed one of the most confusing moive scenes ever :)

[@Novarya]

Thanks! It came from the heart.

[@angeleflett4641]

Thanks man, no problem. I do it for the fans

[@hunteractually3637]

@@angeleflett4641 ?????????????????????????

[@chaotickreg7024]

2:00 Oh my God they both try to trip each other but it fails because they both already saw the other one try and fail.

[@youdontknowmegigna]

So who really tried to trip who first? Eh. . ?

[@woud3404]

1:55 weird thing is that because they are reverse time to eachother, because they are pushing against eachother, they should feel no resistance, because from both of their perspectives the forces go in the direction they want. They push the other backwards, and the one they are pushing is trying to push them except that their time flows opposite so they are pulling. So strange to think about.

[@avimaltz]

Or maybe they are both pushing and therefore they both go in the wanted direction depending on which view u look from

[@avimaltz]

If you are inverted and I am not and I pass a ball to you, each one of us thinks we passed the ball to the other person from our point of view

[@blockmath_2048]

well.... acceleration, and therefore force, is constant no matter the state of inversion.

[@luquinhas-24]

so that pull hurt?

[@Imperium10]

Key word: perspective

[@vsci79]

I watched this forward and now the inverted. I'm at a standstill.

[@Novarya]

Thanks for watching!

[@mordecai4207]

3:55 The inverted part after he goes into the turnstile is like deadpan comedy almost XD just slowwwwwly puts down the gun and backs away like oooookay that was weird

[@Samporium]

always thought this was how time travel should work, never thought someone could execute it tbis beautifully in film.

[@chaotickreg7024]

You can see the intent in both of their actions. You can see the confusion, reaction, and surprise when their attack lands and simultaneously un-lands. Imagine you walk into a room and see a man bloodied and defeated on the floor. You should not feel a sense of finality, instead you should think backwards and anticipate how they will be before you perform the final blow, then you deliver that final blow, but continue to play defense because the struggle will increase. Every time you land a hit it's because there was an opening, and that opening was created by your hit, but then you should leave them in a position where it would be easy to hit them. This is like chess but you have to be careful as your winning state is slowly undone back to the opening. You start with checkmate and you have to play backwards, and sometimes moving a piece will un-capture an enemy piece. You have to flip reaction with anticipation. Maybe none of this is coherent, but that's just a testament to how high concept and difficult this movie is. Very well done.

[@BLINKBOXHD]

yh my brain hurts

[@Ckwon117]

For real man. I think I have a pretty good grasp on how the actual events of the movie played out, and even how the fighting works in big scale battles like the finale, where inverted people may fire gunshots at forward people and vice versa but the hand to hand fighting, is something I'm still having trouble wrapping my head around. Theres so many of these helpful vids by small-time youtubers though so thats nice.

[@sbraypaynt]

There is no way to plan a battle Every hit you ever hit and every hit you’re ever gonna take will happen because you can see it did. There is no way to fight an inverted in hand to hand, you’re both being carried a current in opposite directions and are stuck on this path having to surrender to it. “What’s happened’s, happened”

[@chaotickreg7024]

@@sbraypaynt It doesn't happen until you use your brain to do it.

[@willowism]

@@chaotickreg7024 what's happened, happened though. the entire movie is structured like this.

[@tommiegreen]

3:35 I always thought the inverted protagonist summed the gun from the floor and started firing. Never imagined he emptied the clip then threw it away.

[@ClockworkGearhead]

According to the scientist that first teaches the Protagonist how to use inversion, he did both, and chose to _do_ both.

[@DamianWayne-dm3ju]

…I don’t think so, she said something like, “either way, whether you drop it or will have dropped it, it’s YOUR freewill causing it…” so it’s not that he’s both inverted and forward at the same time… a single instance of the character can only have singular POV-direction, so in this case the inverted Protagonist WAS actually emptying the clip and tossing the gun, but the forward Protagonist from the past didn't know yet (and therefore you as well on the initial viewing) that people could be inverted, and so based on the intro on inverted-bullets that he’d been given, he likely assumed the bullet holes in the glass were from inverted-bullets, hence his saying, “don’t touch them!” - and then he acted on instinct (formed from this limited info he currently had) attempt to “fight back” against this strange and novel assailant who was presumably a normal person using inverted tech… and so they preceded to engage in a fight that wasn’t really a fight meant to kill at all.

[@mitchumkitchum4085]

Apparently Christopher Nolan had an obsession with playing film stock backward and decided to make a movie about it.

[@a17waysJackinn]

4:23 "don't touch them" clearly

[@GeorgeDCowley]

One thing that this scene highlights is that inverted people can seem to have forwards intentions.

[@hiranom20]

Yes, that's because from their point of view, they're moving forward through time, although inverted. It gets really bananas lol

[@tommiegreen]

Imagine moving in reverse in coming into a fight at the end of it lol, and having to ‘Unfight’ them.

[@xyand221]

Damn you can literally play this both ways...

[@Novarya]

Crazy shit

[@ReMattch]

I kind of wish we got to see the plane crash going backwards. The movie was long enough that I get why it wasn't included though.

[@johnlime1469]

It would've been insane if the Protagonist and Robert Pattinson had to run from an inverted explosion of the plane.

[@johnparker3565]

The part where Neil is chasing after the protagonist in reverse looks so funny

[@Vmt16]

Both the normal version and this one are absolutely spectacular! Great work!

[@eravid9202]

Whice one is "normal"? both are.

[@amritvermagkp]

Appreciate your hard work. Tenet is my favorite movie. I have watched it uncountable times, i think nobody can understand this movie in only one time watched

[@gedeseptian704]

but I really do need only once

[@hopexiaorosetheroyal3588]

After watching this forwards and backwards… I should watch the whole movie.

[@ngmui430]

i love this movie, but i didnt realize how confusing it was until now. thank you. also, i didnt realize that english inverted is just russian

[@ConstantineAlexanderSoelaiman]

wait, some of the words are russian 😂 ???

[@whiskybrush3219]

The more i watch this movie the more i freaking love it!

[@Skipti_LLC]

Watching it this way it almost makes more sense

[@eravid9202]

THIS IS AMAZING, IT DOES MAKE EVERYTHING CLEARER THIS WAY!

[@haox9]

weird how the airport personnel dont find it odd that there's two people with a stretcher running backwards from the plane crash

[@stormburn1]

Tbf, who would spend any time looking at two people in (seemingly) emergency masks and suits running "from" a burning wreckage with an injured person on a stretcher when there's so much else going on. It's like asking why people didn't notice the gorilla walking through the shot while they were trying to keep track of how many times the people in white were passing the ball between themselves (oldy-but-goody YT video you could probably find by looking up "did you notice the gorilla?").

[@giogio182]

Exactly. It would have been more realistic if the firefighters had turned their heads toward the stretcher BEFORE the stretcher was in front of them. Because from the firefighters' point of view, the stretcher has already passed them going backwards.

[@louisfrancisco2171]

@@giogio182 They do turn their head before at 0:41

[@jeremyjw]

very good but i think it would have been easier to understand if you left the screen quartered and just backed it out when there was nothing to see

[@jaredalfonso286]

0:36 you can actually see the protagonist in the ambulance

[@musornoyevedro]

Pov Josuke Just used Crazy Diamond:

[@choboutube]

It's a mindblowing film. It get's crazier the more you delve into it, but like all 'fantastic/ make believe' concepts, it'll still fall apart if you overanalyze.

[@windows9965]

It doesn't. This model (particle time-symmetry) is actually and is a part of standard physics and quantum electrodynamics. The protagonist represents a 'particle' in that model.

[@kurtilein3]

@@windows9965 One thing is that for air molecules interacting with each other and with walls, you cannot tell in which direction in time they are going. You can tell with complex things like humans, airplanes, cars, birds, explosions, guns, because one way is statistically highly preferred. So there is no need for inverted air. It does not matter, air works just fine both ways. Its most likely an intentional physics plot hole, added as a justification to give all the inverted people masks, to make it easier for the audience. I get a sense that there are other plot holes, but i have to think about them more.

[@icedchqi]

@@kurtilein3 i dont understand much of what youre talking about, im not exactly the most educated. but does this mean that a CO2 particle in the air can be inhaled by an inverted person, converted into oxygen, and exhaled into the air as usable oxygen for non inverted people to breathe, turning it back into co2?

[@kurtilein3]

@@icedchqi No. For molecules of O2 or CO2, it simply does not matter if they are inverted or not, they behave the same either way. There are materials, and that is true for all of the gases in the atmosphere, where it does not matter if you invert them. There is no need to bring air across the boundary. Inverted people have to wear masks only because it helps the movie.

[@mayurgudi381]

You made both sequences in reverse so the second scene ( the fight ) became sensible but the first scene became reverse now 😂

[@povertyspec9651]

The time they spent editing this movie must have been insane

[@BossSev38]

Should do the highway scene - it's more confusing

[@carlosdirects4587]

The inverted version is sooo good.

[@Novarya]

Thanks!!

[@fredskull1618]

Tenet really is Nolan’s “Heaven’s Gate”

[@dr4gonstear]

The fight scene looks so good in forward and reverse. That's so wild and impressive. But how did the protagonist come "out" of the machine on both sides at the same time? Didn't it establish in the movie you don't go into the machine unless you see yourself come out the other side first? How did 2 come out?

[@max__pain]

I know it's a dumb question, but could someone explain to me as simply as possible: if we can move in both directions in the spatial 3 dimensions, why can't we do the same with time? Why must be always go "forward" in time? I'm not say we *should* be able to move back - I just want to know why.

[@kukuhmuntono]

Because if you wouldn't be able to react and do shit if you also move backwards in time. Something must've move forward for you, at the very least your mind is. Cuz if your mind move backward, now you think of something, but then time rewinds and you forgot what you just thought, so basically you can't think and plan anything like that. Now if your mind still moves forward, you'd still be able to observe things around you and think of what to do

[@momom6197]

From a physics perspective, there is no particular reason we can move spatially either, it's just how the universe works: the forces of interaction work spatially and not temporally, and there's nothing to say about the why. Time travel is authorized by the laws of physics (for example using wormholes or CTC) but not the way it is depicted in Tenet, as far as we know for now. Funnily enough, Tenet is one of the rare depictions of scientifically accurate time-travel from a causality viewpoint: the "what's happened, happened" is basically Novikov's self-consistency principle. So, basically, there is no known reason, although there are plenty of related studies. Remember that believeing in a reason is a matter of philosophy, not science: feeling that there ought to be an explanation is a fact about us, not about the universe.

[@syjiang]

Its not a dumb question at all! It actually a really deep and profound one best answered from thermodynamics. Easiest way to learn about this is search up the term Arrow of time. In physics almost everything are symmetrical in process with an exception for entropy. The second law of thermodynamics stipulate that an isolated system experiences increase in entropy with time (Isolated system here is a key word, we can reverse entropy regionally i.e. like in a fridge making ice with energy as input, but if you account for the whole system where waste heat is exhausted out of the fridge, the entire entropy of the system actually increased to make those ice). As this process is irreversible it gives time a direction.

[@GeorgeDCowley]

@@syjiang But why not focus on the other way.

[@ssgoko88]

In case you actually want an answer: Think of a ball in an empty room. It just sits there. Another ball rolls into the first ball and so the first ball starts to roll in the same direction. In our universe, these balls are equivalent to particles of matter (atoms, molecules, quanta, etc.) We know these particles must exist because we observe these changes in direction in our daily lives. In our universe a particle can push you in any of the 3 spacial dimensions, because those particles interact with the 3 spacial dimensions. There are no particles that we know of that can push you in the time dimension. We are moving forward in time and nothing is slowing us down or speeding us up. Here's the cool part: we have *no way of knowing* if our universe has more than 3 spatial dimensions, or more than 1 time dimension. If those other dimensions exist, but there is no way to interact with that dimension, we will never be able to observe an interaction. Lastly, time probably doesn't even exist like that. Time is just an emergent phenomenon of our brains. In this universe the only thing that matters is the order events are carried out in.

[@AB-vp9mi]

2:36 That was beautiful.

[@hectorricardo8406]

Can you help me wrap my head around that scene? Why did non-inverted protagonist (from his own point of view) backed up, as if he were scared? I get that the inverted protagonist (from his own POV) was crawling backwards towards the gun.

[@AB-vp9mi]

@@hectorricardo8406 (kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqnNYX6Ipt-iY5I ) this is where the kick happens and the UIP is sent backwards with a probably very weird pain since he has no frigging idea about backwardness yet.

[@AB-vp9mi]

@@hectorricardo8406 In case my previous message didn't go through (can't find it), at 2:39, the inverted Protagonist (IP for short) kicks the uninverted Protagonist (UIP for short) in the abdomen, which sends the IUP backwards in the uninverted Timeline. However, due to the nature of the inverted Timeline, the pain might feel weird since instead of the pain appearing at the kick, it disappears lol, so he ends up checking himself to see what the hell is going on. However, the IP which crawled towards the gun in the inverted Timeline ends up crawling away from the gun in the uninverted Timeline.

[@hectorricardo8406]

@@AB-vp9mi Thanks for the explanation. So just to make sure I understand 100%: In the normal timeline POV, UIP is backing up (away from the gun) shocked because he felt someone pushed him on the abdomen, but he did not see his opponent pushing him. However, there was an apparently invisible push happening *before* UIP felt pushed. In the inverted timeline POV, IP wants to push UIP. Since the timeline is inverted, the effect comes before the cause. So while IP is preparing for the push, UIP is coming closer to IP. Once UIP's abdomen comes in contact with IP's feet, the push ends for IP but is just beginning for UIP. Did I get it right? Thanks!

[@anthonymartensen3164]

Best part 6:07

[@perfect_genius7058]

6:32

[@illogical1421]

I'm still lost lmao

[@scottyjbd]

Verrry cool

[@Novarya]

Thanks!

[@DevrajsinhJhala]

To the editor/maker of this video on this youtube channel, I came to this video from the video about forward perspective of this event in the film. I had watched that video when it released, I was just revisiting it now. And I saw that this video exists. I saw the video and wandered, Did you edit the whole from scratch or just reversed the video that you posted? I'm an editor as well, I know you edited this from scratch, as I saw some clips have perfect forward going audio and those scenes don't have their reverse shots in film. So yes, you did great work here!! Thank you!! Happy that we all share such love for films and filmmaking!

[@tatau_channel]

4:26 It seems nameless man know everything what happens

[@Metaphsics]

You are genius.

[@amygraham1944]

sweet video...did you do one of the battle?

[@andhikap5696]

In the inverted version when he's started bleeding in 0:05 but only got stabbed in 3:28, when is the wound started to occur ? Is it always there since the start of the movie/forward version? Ok my head hurt 😩

[@alrshdshm]

request for mid point war sync

[@justinkim8856]

You’re a genius

[@angeleflett4641]

He rushed in to be reversed in forward time through the machine.. ohhhhh

[@davtoh]

Can someone pls explain how is Neil chasing TP (and both running in the same direction) when TP is inverted? 3:18

[@tarekboinaheri3559]

I wondered the same thing as you but I think it's like the scene on the highway where one voluntarily drives in reverse what do you think ?

[@davtoh]

@@tarekboinaheri3559 i rewatched the entire scene in the movie, TP was no longer inverted :)

[@YDG666]

So it means we had 3 protagonist at same time? One was helping the girl, one was going back to the forward world and the last one was fighting himself trying to go back to the reversed world?

[@adrianrr18]

3:05 around here don't we see THREE protagonists? I can understand up to two!

[@stevesmiff]

This movie is f*cking WILD!

[@zaaduc.]

A scienfiction masterpiece!

[@unarmed_civilian]

Whose pistol it was?

[@CentralParkish]

Time travel is dangerous when we see this movie.

[@andrewt5348]

My question is, why would he try to shoot himself???

[@syjiang]

He already experienced this fight as the opponent and knew the outcome which was that he successfully jumped into the machine and his past self was unharmed. He also knew that in the struggle the gun was fired and they started closer to the machine. He likely didn't have time during the fight to process the complexities of outcomes given the violation of normal cause and effect while interacting with the world due to time reversal. So probably by instinct he shot the gun thinking it will get the opponent to dodge left and inch closer to the machine. Of course his opponent was in normal time flow and from his past perspective was trying to push the firing gun away to the right and was experiencing things completely differently. Notice in normal time flow the gun discharges when it is far away from our suit hero's head. It does highlight the scientists advice at the start to "don't try the understand it but feel it" while she plays with the inverted bullet adeptly. She is trying to get him to develop new instincts when interacting with time reversal world where our normal feel for cause and effect are violated.

[@manuelromero2339]

I'm pretty sure he was firing the gun to disarm it. Then at the end when the gun was taken from him, the only choice was to pull the clip out since he was about to be on the other side of the turnstile with his past self fully armed if he didn't.

[@themastersofshadow8670]

Congratulations 👏🏻👏🏻u made it even more complicated

[@IIwII_usxx]

i’m so confused as to what this movie is exactly about.

[@IshmaelDoe]

man I am really confused with your video, but after I thinking about it, it is a lot of effort, and I appreciate it. The problem with your editing is that the older MC and his partner action in this version should always be forward, cut in the part were the young version show "forward" (and older version show backward) action just doesn't make sense.

[@Humulator]

what? be clearer. whos mc. what young person show forward thing?

[@thewaltgamer5686]

But how did the protagonist dissapear like that in this part... 3:53

[@MegKBaker]

Why do they sound kinda German in the reversed audio

[@quarryfossick1075]

I still don't get the reason why he is shooting himself...

[@Novarya]

He’s not; just getting himself to move towards the turnstile.

[@Raulito2td]

Also if you noticed closely he is purposely missing every shot so that he makes sure the gun is fully unloaded and cant can be use against his forward or inverted self

[@tommiegreen]

Unloading the weapon with intent to scare protagonist I believe,

[@manuelromero2339]

@@Raulito2td Yeah I'm 99 percent sure this is the correct answer. Disarm the lethal weapon in a fight where neither party should be dying and your fighting partner doesn't know the stakes. He was about to be on the other side of the turnstile and his original self would have been fully armed had he not done what he had done. He basically guaranteed the gun was unusable for the whole fight.

[@AAaaAA-ik7zg]

0:31 is he drunk?

[@shandrewsampson6539]

what is this about? plz xplain to me

[@Spectalys]

03:20 how can they run in the same direction of time ?

[@Novarya]

He reverted

[@JS-vw9up]

reverted

[@joejoeshabadoo]

I really appreciate the work, but I'm more confused watching it like this.

[@greinum]

00:30 loool

[@TIMUR.VAKHABOV]

С этим ролик яснее как что и когда происходит.

[@dizmix]

Whos Zooming Who??!

[@rodrirodri]

...won desufnoc erom ma I

[@Maxim.Nazarenko]

Good.

[@mahedihasen4804]

How this movie It i's really confusing movie

[@ztrkmtrk42]

inverted version is not confusing as other video, that's why tenet is not well performed insteresting idea.

[@ChronoXShadow]

... Now I really don't get it...

[@Novarya]

Sorry!

[@casualkitty1381]

Remember Ang Lee's Hulk? He thought, "It's a comic book movie, it should have multiple panels, like a comic book." I didn't like Ang Lee's Hulk editing either.

[@jeffrymartebonifacio8937]

Headache

[@cosmicvoidtree]

“After” (while watching this version) Protagonist is inverted, it looks like two people speaking German walking out of a crime scene like, “we really shouldn’t be here”. Also the inverted view makes the 1v1 of protagonist vs inverted protagonist look normal (although this is in the movie). I loved TeneT, but I won’t deny that it has flaws.

[@nightinthewhite3817]

This HAS to make sense to someone, whoever wrote it maybe, also some parts where the 2 screens are showed, you can see how they didnt move the same way, like at 2:34

[@GambinoTheGoat]

wonky

[@jacksonfev]

If you think you understand it, you're wrong.

[@samiahmed7056]

Nonsense made more nonsense

[@ArielContetito28arg]

!Movie awesome really (read in reverse)😂.....