Tensions Rise in Court as Defendant Shamelessly Breaks the Law!

[@bicentennialbuck]

Whenever you hear the judge say Mr Allen if you're the defendant it's over

[@AUser-t6n]

His lawyer did good though, given the circumstances. He made the appropriate points in client's defense without being overbearing.

[@RockPaperHammer]

You had me at “Mr. Allen “. Love judge Simpson ❤

[@joey97024]

Yessss ❤

[@mwrgaming284]

"I'm stupid" best words to come out of his mouth

[@paulfranklin8636]

His whole persona in court is one of a bully who thinks this is all a waste of his time. I guarantee he bullied her into asking for the order previous order to be lifted. He's nasty arrogant little bully

[@gast4215]

It's difficult for the prosecutor and the judge. Judge Stevens said in one hearing, that victims of domestic violence often ask for lifting the order for different reasons: they need a caregiver or some do it out of fear, because the perpetrator puts pressure onto them and they are afraid of that time, when the defendant is free again (from probation or jail). Imho it's not so easy to say that it's her responsibility. What if the judge lifts the order and there is an incident again (which already happened) bit with serious injuries or even worse?

[@mimiprays8288]

"I understood it but I didn't know in the court it would be the same"...smh yeah right.

[@angdunn4124]

not very mindful to wear a black and white striped robber shirt to court XD

[@jimbrunsman1011]

Yes, I noticed that too. This guy is rather clueless.

[@Alwaysgetalawyer]

His orange jumpsuit was in the laundry.

[@Kell4088]

@@Alwaysgetalawyer 😂👍🏼

[@chrislsommers]

Yeah, that's a peculiar choice.

[@joey97024]

😂

[@jpquinta1]

This guy brings his own jail suit ready to go to jail judge😊

[@Alwaysgetalawyer]

We all know he's living in the home with his wife and that he probably doesn't even have a brother.

[@zubetp]

oh, i'm sure he has a brother. that would be very easy for them to look into. he's just not staying with him lmao

[@SallySallySallySally]

The dreaded words, "Mister Allen."

[@mariroberts231]

As a DV survivor, this isn't his first time and it definitely wont be his time abusing her..She wants a handyman for around the house? look for one on the internet..

[@joey97024]

No contact means NO CONTACT 🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫

[@billcarson1966]

The Hamburglar stoops to DV in his later years...

[@rqdh22501]

Lol

[@collettedobrocke4518]

He has intimidated her. ....he WILL do it again 😮

[@collettedobrocke4518]

BALONEY

[@misswildlife7905]

he's already done it before and then she wants it changed again. He's a bully.

[@EliteXclutchX21]

@@collettedobrocke4518idiot, did you forget to listen to this case? You bafoon.

[@navyhmc8302]

This man appears to be very adept at manipulation and victim enabling. I have to believe that even though he feigns ignorance, he knows exactly what he is doing and has juust a little contempt of the court as a whole. This isn't his first rodeo and he knows how to manipulate the system. I like how the defense demeanor changed immediately after Judge Simpson said the immortal words: "Mister Allen". I was also a bit surprised that the defendant used the Walz "I'm just stupid" defense for his actions.

[@misswildlife7905]

Fabulous decision!!!!!

[@zubetp]

yeah, uh, he's not staying with his brother lol.

[@Boyso5407]

This is just like the idiots who drive to court to face their charges for driving with a suspended license

[@robjohnson1138]

Judge said defendant has been through this before, and knows how this works. Yes, he knows how it works, so he’s playing fast-and-loose thinking he knows what he can get away with. I guess he got too comfortable…

[@scottmccool7242]

Feeling real sorry for the defense attorney.

[@aletheaglenn6656]

If the wife doesn't want a no contact order, she needs to quit calling the police and then asking them to drop the charges. These are false 911 calls.

[@nctpti2073]

Might not be her calling. Might be the neighbors, or even their kids.

[@DoncasterLass]

how many victims forgive their aggressor and then end up un-alived? that's why no contact orders are put in place until trial. and he has committed DV before

[@zubetp]

so i think you're a little off base and i'd love a chance to explain why. i think you're accidentally disregarding the psychological pressure that exists in abusive households. i obviously don't know this person any more than you do, but i'm going to speak about the phenomenon in general. i'm also going to refer to the abuser as a man and the victim as a woman because that's the dynamic in this case. in violent relationships, the abuser is not violent and horrible constantly, or else the victim would have very little trouble ending the relationship. there's a cycle in abusive relationships where after a violent episode, the abuser will apologize and be sweet to the victim. the time after a violent episode is the best days of their relationship. they will make up, the romance will be intense and intoxicating, and he will promise never to do it again. this period in the cycle is called the "honeymoon period." because this honeymoon period exists, the victim sincerely believes that it's possible the violence will stop. she knows it's possible, and that possibility is part of what keeps her there. she believes that the arrest will be a catalyst for change. she is also aware of whatever set him off - "he only gets violent when he drinks/he's stressed/he spends time with his brother who does drugs/money is tight/etc." - so she convinces herself that as long as she prevents whatever that was from happening again, she can end the violence. there is also _no perfect victim._ we are all flawed. it's entirely possible that she has her own vices - maybe she drinks, or she lost her job, or she picks fights with him because she feels he's being unfaithful. maybe _she_ is unfaithful. because of this, she will feel that she is the direct cause of the violence, and therefore she is the reason he's been arrested. as she decompresses after the violent episode, she feels guilt and shame for "doing this to him." she may also hear from his friends and family. they may urge her to drop the charges and advocate for him. they may reinforce her conflicted thoughts by telling her he didn't mean it and her sense of guilt by talking about how terrible it's been for him since the arrest. they also share a household. she may rely on his support financially and in the care of pets and children. it may be a genuine hardship for her to lose her partner's support in this time. and, she believes she loves him. she misses him. she wants things to "go back to normal," because the cyclical nature of the abuse has tricked her into forgetting that this is a _pattern._ let's assume, though, that that's not at play. let's assume she knows this is an abusive relationship and does not want to get back together. she may also be experiencing intimidation from her abuser. she knows he won't be in prison forever and ever. he _will_ get out, and when he does, how will he feel about the fact that she did not do as he asked and drop the charges? now, let's get specific about this case. it's clear that the defendant doesn't respect boundaries. he knows he has a no contact order, but he went directly to his victim and sat down next to her. i do not believe him that he was confused about the parameters of the no contact order. that was a silly excuse and the judge didn't buy it. and as for a false 911 call, the prosecutor read from the police report in this video. according to the police, there was evidence of violence in the home. furniture had been overturned and there was broken glass everywhere. this wasn't fabricated - whether you do or don't believe she's the victim of abuse, a physical altercation clearly did take place here. look. the numbers don't lie. we _know_ that the victims of abuse return to their abusers again and again and again. it's willfully ignorant to pretend that's not the case and it's cruel to insist that this means they deserve the abuse because they asked for it in some way. nobody here is saying no one ever lies about abuse - that would be as silly as the defendant's excuse for blowing off the no contact order. but we have no evidence at this time that abuse doesn't take place. on the contrary, the evidence shows that this has happened before, and centuries of statistics show that it will happen again. anyway, i hope i gave some insight. if you want to know more, i would recommend "why does he do that?" by lundy bancroft. he explains this all better than i can. and if you didn't read this or it didn't change any minds, then no hard feelings.

[@chessie8675]

Waste of tax payers’ dollars.

[@123cutieputtie]

I cant stand these cases. STOP calling the cops to waste everyone's time. Im glad the court is hard on these people. Okay you want to stay and get your ass beat dont involve anyone else

[@robjohnson1138]

Lawyer at @17:20 “that’s just a lot going on for a civilian.” A civilian?

[@ML-ov5qi]

She says she "needs" him home, but does she "WANT" him home?? That's a better question.... Sounds like she needs him to help around home with things she can't do and to take her places, so she rely's on him. It's not the same as WANTING him at home and feeling safe with him there...

[@QMorrissey]

such a good judge

[@BlackPanther-m5l]

Multiple times he won't hive the address so is he living with her then? It's usually men who get no contact orders they don't leave women alone, they see women as property.

[@misswildlife7905]

If you are going to wear a mask, then wear it properly, rather than as a jock strap on your chin..worthless!!!

[@mht525]

Not truthful 😂. Go Judge...

[@gigib8849]

It’s not ignorance. It’s defiance.

[@rdfrancis455]

So disappointed. I saw the title in my feed as "Tensions Rise in Court as Defendant Shamelessly Break..." Was sophomorishly hoping it ended "...s Wind Constantly"

[@Boyso5407]

How can you say “I don’t care who said it, you’re gone”. The whole point of throwing someone out is because they actually said something. That right there should’ve gotten the ump suspended

[@Boyso5407]

This posted to the wrong video lol

[@darbyohara]

1:45 “we contend sitting next to her is contact” … uh what the fuck That’s no contact especially if they’re in a public court hearing. Contact means in close proximity not across the room in a public space

[@paulineszymanski8650]

You must have missed them sitting beside each other. They even showed them sitting together.

[@carolynmurray7593]

Like when. These people play stupid.before that.they.so smart trying. Out smart.judge😂😂😂

[@AustinLathrop]

Absolutely hate it when the government thinks they know better than the actual people involved in the incident.

[@sandboxplayerz667]

The actual people involved called the police/government. If you don't want them to be involved, then don't involve them. Simple.

[@akzh]

Probably they know. There is usually a reason for such an order.

[@akzh]

Probably they know. There is usually a reason for such an order.

[@123cutieputtie]

​@sandboxplayerz667 exactly called the police twice in the SAME year just to waste tax money on a case that will eventually be dismissed.

[@BlackPanther-m5l]

If it wasn't for the courts some of these people would be running around behaving like they are in Gotham City from the Batman movies!