Listen on the go at all podcast locations: anchor.fm/demystifysci Material solutions to quantum spookiness: www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Short films @DemystifySciInvestigates: kzbin.info/door/UfzVdgNu2xLThgM2qQZmSQ
@babylundun2 ай бұрын
STATE = CHIRCH SCIENCE = RELIGION THEORY = THEOLOGY THEORIST = THEOLOGIAN ATHEIST = THEIST ANTITHESIS = THESIS EDUCATION = INDOCTRINATION SO WHEN I DID MEET WITH PRINCIPALS, PROFESSORS, PREVOSTS, PRESIDENTS OF SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES THEY ALWAYS ASK ABOUT ACCREDITATION OR CREDENTIALS 💭 🤔 MY RESPONSE IS YES I HAVE TAUGHT INDEPENDENTLY AT SCHOOLS K - 12, I.E., CURRICULUM CONSULTATION AND ACADEMIA PRESENTATION, ETC. AND EVEN TAUGHT IN CONSULTED WITH PREACHERS OR PASTORS AND PRESENTED IN CHURCHES. TO THE MEMBERS, THEN I ASK HOWEVER, WHAT DOES ACCREDITATION AND CREDENTIALS HAVE TO DO WITH ME, AN INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER INVESTIGATOR PRESENTING PAPERS ON AN OPEN PROBLEM FOR PEER REVIEW 📃 ✍️🏿 ? AND HOW DOES ACCREDITATION OR CREDENTIALS PROMOTE OR PREVENT ME BEING PEER REVIEWED, PUBLISHING PROCUREMENT (VENDOR, SOLICITATION), OR PATENTS (COPY RIGHTS)? AND BESIDES THAT I SAY TO THE STAFF IF I WERE ACCREDITED AS FACULTY AND CREDENTIALED AS STAFF OR EVEN ENROLLED AS A STUDENT THEN JUST AS THEY ARE WITHOUT IDEA OR SOLUTION I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SOLVE THE OPEN PROBLEMS THAT I HAVE, I.E., ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION, PRIME PAIR GAP CONJECTURES, PRIME PATTERN FOR PERIODICITY, PRIMALITY TESTER PRIME CHECKER, PRIME COUNTING FUNCTIONS, ZETA OF S AND OR PI OF X, A NONDETERMINISTIC POLYNOMIAL TIME FORMULA FOR FIGURING AND FACTORING REALS AND PRIMES, ..... I ALSO HAVE NEW NUMBERS AND NUMERALS, NEW NUMBER LINES AND GRAPH LINES, NEW ORDERS OF OPERATIONS,, NEW SOLUTIONS TO UNKNOWN PROBLEMS.... I HAVE SOLVED AND PROVED THE QUASI RIDDLE OF THE BARBER OF ALL NOT BARBERS PARADOX A.K.A. THE SET OF ALL NOT SETS AND THE PSEUDO PARADOX OF THE LIAR OF ALL LIARS PARDOX A.K.A. THE SET OF ALL SETS .... THE REAL OPEN HARD PROBLEM IS NOT SOLVING PROBLEMS OR PROVING SOLUTIONS, THE REAL OPEN HARD PROBLEM IS SHOWING PEOPLE THE PROBLEM IS SOLVED AND PROVING TO PEOPLE THE SOLUTION IS THE PROOF. DR. NEELY FULLER SAID, THE SYSTEM , RANK AND FILE WILL IGNORE ANYONE WITH VITAL INFORMATION UNTIL PEOPLE START TO LISTEN AND THEN THE SYSTEM BREAKS THE PEOPLE UP AND OR BREAKS THE PERSON DOWN.... MY MOTO IS TO: 1) CREATE CURRICULUM 2) CHALLENGE THE SYSTEM 3) COMPETE WITH THE SYSTEM 4) CHAMPION ACADEMIA "YOU CHANGE PEOPLE'S MINDS; YOU CHANGE SYSTEM WIDE." P.S. THERE IS NO WAY I WOULD SAY ALL OF THIS TO TELL A LIE.... THE PUBLIC IS INDOCTRINATED WITH RELIGION AND EGUCATED WITH SCOENCE... FOR INSTANCE, MASS MEDIA, MUSIC, MOVIES, MAGAZINES AND OTHER MEDIUMS CONTROL THE EMOTIONS AND MANIPULATE THE MINDS OF THE MASSES THUS THE PEOPLE DO NOT THINK FOR THEMSELVES AND DO NOT TEACH FOR THEMSELVES.... THE MATH MESSAGE PROMOTED TO THE PUBLIC IS IN JOKES AND JINGLES, SUCH AS: "ASK SIRI HOW TO DIVIDE BY ZERO." IT IS A JOKE. ASK A PROFESSOR, TEACHER , PASTOR OR PREACHER OR EVEN ASK MATH EXPERT AND THEY ALL GIGGLE AND SAY "YOU CAN'T DIVIDE BY ZERO." LIKE ITS A JINGLE. IF YOU ASK WHY NOT THEY ALL SAY "ZERO DIVIDE BY ZERO IS INDETERMINANT AND OR ANY NUMBER DIVIDE BY ZERO IS UNDEFINE. THEIR RESPONSE MERELY RESTATES THE OPEN PROBLEM "TO DETERMINE AND DEFINE ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION. ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION UNDEFINED DOES NOT MEAN UNDEFINABLE.... 💭 🤔 LASTLY, THE PEOPLE PUT TOO MUCH FAITH AND BELIEF INTO THE SYSTEM AND BOARD,: RANK AN FILE.... TRUTHFULLY, dantepittman19@gmail.cpm @DemystifySci, contact me if you are interested in said meta closed solutions to said proto open problems.
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
sup guys, smee again :D The one who teased you about your owl :P Anyhow. Lets still assume you are not the bad guys. Meantime - some progress. I managed to suck Even More Data (TM) out of the akash (idk how many pieces i have now, it´s wild). I`m unable to talk about it as it gets wiped everywhere :D Wanna know before the manage to wipe me out too? So i must be close to smth important. _Wanna talk?_ Anyhow, cause you were the practicing scientists, by any change do you remember some formulas with the power/root of 16? (Currently im looking at Clifford algebra, smthsmth about rank 16, but the sci jargon is too strong for me to decode Witten´s 230 pages... yeah and i have no interest learning the jargon). Imagine my formula being 100.00% correct, and 70y old formulas are 30% off the chart (aka false explanation formulas - probably for science deception). I just dont know how power/root of 16 "works". If you are interested, prep large pot of liquids. :)
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
idk if i pushed you while ago to mock the word "particle" at every step you can, but keep doing it :D A few week ago i accidentally broke some "materialist" with mirror questions. He red pilled himself, told me his brain is broken now :D (before he was "soulless".) Maybe it was easy to break him because he could actually see auras. idk... But he had really hard time that "someone"/some process lets me to see the (probable) future, to cancel nasty timelines. A few lifelines have been canceled that way. I wish i didnt, as one was my own. Look at this dumb world, ffs.
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
Serious question: y'all both have PhD's in the Sciences from Columbia!! Are you really buying Terrence Howard's nonsense? I'd invite you to read his book; it's very poorly written, full of contradictions and logical fallacies... It's such a terrible book. What are y'all's opinion about his book?
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
1:22:50 I don't like how Terrence Howard keeps cutting off Anastasia here, when she challenged him on his mathematical errors. He gish gallups like crazy, changing the subject and tossing some word salads, even laughing right in her face. He's so rude. Anastasia, you were totally right in this segment of the interview, about how dimensionality of units matter! 1 square foot is not the same as 1 foot! They represent different concepts! (Area vs. length), but they're both defined to be of unit size. Sorry Terrence was so rude to you!
@OneMindHistory2 ай бұрын
Ahahahah Terrence eventually standing in a casual kitchen explaining his stuff is just too good
@darius69172 ай бұрын
it's hard out here for a mathematical theorist
@WilliamNobleBonninActual2 ай бұрын
Numbers are supposed to do the work for you. You’re doing it wrong Seems easy to me
@santerisatama54092 ай бұрын
My hobby is foundations of mathematics (reading Proclus' commentary on Euclid now). I don't fully agree with Howard, but I find his ideas fresh and fruitful and a good opening for having a genuine discussion on ontology etc. philosophy of mathematics. According to Proclus' Platonism, the only non-hypothetical (or as some would say today, non-axiomatic) science is the Dialectical science (ie. Philosophy). Mathematics is empirical (intuitive) science with special place between dialectical science and other sciences on one hand, and between 'nous' (and theology) and phenomenology on the other hand. I'd like to hear what's hard for you here. Myself, I don't believe that numbers really exist (they are just results of tally operations), and my foundational view is operational and relational process ontology of mathematics also in the ideal domain (intuitionism instead of modern/Gödel's Platonism).
@JamesDimond-l7u2 ай бұрын
Bc math explains nothing skippy
@Lolleka2 ай бұрын
real
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
@@santerisatama5409 You don't fully agree with Howard, because he doesn't even fully agree with himself. He constantly contradicts himself, in interviews AND in his awful book. Terrence Howard knows nothing of math & science, and he proves THAT fact with every new word salad that comes out of his mouth
@Goldzen_tv2 ай бұрын
So as I understand it Terrance is basically trying to explain the fundamental laws that govern a scalable vector space. If this reality that we inhabit is really an advanced simulation or vector space then he has discovered how it is assembled. I wish I was a computer science engineer who can utilise this concept into new system architecture and code architecture to which he referenced in the JRE episode where electronics would be more efficient if designed in motion instead of straight lines to generate less heat and resistance. Super interesting stuff this idea/concept does have wide ranging applications that have yet to be further explored and applied into our perceivable reality. Amazing time we live in that is for sure and i'm with him 100% that there will be a divide or breakaway civilisation that uses this technology and the people who are complacent and still defending the matrix will be left behind. Let's just hope we all survive long enough for this technology to fester instead of being swept under the rug like many times before in history.
@raycar1165Ай бұрын
I’ll take a ticket on that train outta here.
@OchiiDinUmbraa2 ай бұрын
Someone show Terrence that for every number between 0 and 1, if you square it, you get a smaller number. He is going to lose his mind.
@Adambombgallerie2 ай бұрын
Thats soo hilarious, I just did that exact thing. Multiply anything smaller than one by itself and it shrinks. I’ve never done that before and thought, “someone had to have said something about it?!” Here you are! After experiencing the diminishing returns from my “multiplication” I immediately realized, “clearly I don’t understand something about math.” Of course I don’t, I went to art school.
@OchiiDinUmbraa2 ай бұрын
@@Adambombgallerie on a calculator every number between 0 and 1 can be expressed as a fraction: a/b where a is smaller than b. So when you square this fraction, you get (a*a)/(b*b). And because b is bigger than a, when you square b you get a bigger return than when you square a. And thus, the result is smaller.
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
except number is a verb, to count, resulting in a quantity .. zero is a placekeeper for scale, that O in geometry denotes "point of Origin", 0 means nothing, nada, without quantity, therefore zero is a numeral only, NaN, not a number, (see infinity for the other bookend of mathemagical madness) .. meanwhile, phi .. 1 + phi = phi * phi; 1+sqrt(5) / 2; the speed of light may be c but then the velocity of light becomes pi/2 * c , vector is 2d and rate is 1d, length of path vs. distance between endpoints, assuming that sinusoidal wave model.
@rh0msfer44329 күн бұрын
Someone show Terrance how to count from 1 to 10, it will blow his mind, he's that f**king stupid and so are everyone who thinks he's a genius. He can't articulate what he's saying in a coherent manner because he's stupid, then we have idiots trying to interpret what he's saying, it's hilarious. He doesn't say anything, word salads, like listening to Kamala Harris on politics. If he was right about anything he could express his theories in math and would be peer reviewed, but he's not, he's simply a narcissist with a real god complex.
@Anyon-z2s29 күн бұрын
@@williiayummjayagreed like Terrance said a ¾ structure is the crux of energy and matter I show this with x=c(a+b) in 3 folds and the forth being an emergence beyond base 10 if you're interested comment back and I'll email you my paper
@gianni_schicchi2 ай бұрын
1:35:00 The calculator is using floating points which will have rounding errors for irrational numbers.
@lightboyxxx2332 ай бұрын
The iPhone's calculator is generally good at working with floating point numbers, as it rounds to a fixed number of significant digits. This is the correct thing to do with floating point numbers. - google
@janedrew30502 ай бұрын
"It is quite comfortable to me to find that experiment need not quail before mathematics but is quite competent to rival it in discovery" -Michael Faraday
@mariogonzales97522 ай бұрын
I love all of you and I truly love brother Terrence, please keep on doing what you doing
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
@@mariogonzales9752 you just got a 👍+1…let grow this thing…🫶#tlc
@lorenalberico7964 күн бұрын
Bro! This conversation was legit!!!!!! Loved it. Thank you all for your minds and your words. ❤
@matthewhoch78523 күн бұрын
I agree!
@vibehighest2 ай бұрын
btw, i have your back T✌🤝
@KaliFissure2 ай бұрын
Space is a dielectric super fluid. Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. Compactification creates limits. A maxima , event horizon, and a minima, Lambda. This gradient is gravity. Because geometric flows are real. Compactification also forces conservation because it's a closed system. Closed in time. Limit theorem also dictates that the closure is at the limits. The limits connect. In at event horizon Out in deep void. This is the flow of the universe. Each neutron which contacts an event horizon Takes EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space The free neutron decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup, Dark matter. The decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of amorphous hydrogen gas is a volume increase of around 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy. In time this amorphous hydrogen stabilizes and coalesces and falls towards an event horizon. Loop. Neutron decay cosmology. 🖖
@hollaadieewaldfeee2 ай бұрын
Space comes from spacings. Concept only. Not fluid. Time = tacts/ spacings. Concept. Planck created "quantity", Einstein did not understand concepts: he turned concept qunatum, quantity, into things: quanta. Nonsens;-)
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
space is a shadow. it does not exist. space is a woowoo. :D
@nuestra_victoria2 ай бұрын
I think you’re on to something. Spacetime is the force free gravitational potential field of the universe. Its the background gravitational humm that permeates all of existence. Spacetimes origin comes from mass. This makes sense because mass is space and it affects time. Spacetime has no meaning without mass. Spacetime existing independent of mass can only occur in books.
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
@@nuestra_victoria fields are illusion, mathematical bshttery. space is a shadow. space is illusionary. it does not exists. waves do not exists. they are a shaddow representations of a process
@rubstroll121 күн бұрын
Jee , I won’t need the first course, I am full up with the 🥗 salad!…
@georgemichelakis12022 ай бұрын
I mean the Aether is Space-Time. Scientists are just confused by what the word physical actually means. Most of them say that energy is not physical so they have complicated something which can be simple. For me anything that exists is physical otherwise it would exist. If spacetime has effects on physical objects then it is physical, just not in the same way that matter is. It is physical in a more subtle form.
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
speaking of physical, point toward the direction of time ..
@justinzeller73721 күн бұрын
Everything that "exists" is polarized with its opposite therefore physical existence is also polarized with a nonphysical existence that cannot be seen, measured or experienced on this side of the equation.
@bobann356621 күн бұрын
@@williiayummjay Time has no direction, the loss of Aether moves outward and than returns inward and it is measured by time.
@metrab890112 күн бұрын
i think you 'real' not physical. There are non physical things that are real
@bryan41812 ай бұрын
What Terrence is doing is commendable in so far as allowing those inclined to think about alternatives the freedom and desire to do so. Assumptions seem to abound in science today and the recognition that some knowledge may be beyond us the way we are going is desperately needed. Eric Weinstein wanted Terrence to focus on this, and give Howard the opportunity to shine with his alternative thinking. I think Howard knows that reality will always outrun apprehension, and that is the stick and carrot. We need a new donkey. The question I ask is if I was going to build a simulation how would I design it so that the simulated would never prove they are in a simulation? The universe isn't fine tuned for life, life is fine tuned for a simulated universe..
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
That was always allowed... (That = freedom to believe untested and/or false nonsense)
@seanharbinger2 ай бұрын
Yeah but he’s wrong. Declaratively. 😂😂😂
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
exactly the opposite is true, he takes well developed ideas, conflates them out of context and destroys the past .. pythagoras theorem derives from radii and circles, starts with length (r = 1, quantity) of a line segment or distance between points .. go from there, area shows up pretty quick. without maths at all, pure form and logic.
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
1:24:56 This entire calculator demonstration is merely a parlor trick. Terrence does not understand how floating-point arithmetic works in computation. The precision of the calculation depends on the number of bits allocated by the operating system or programming language to represent the base, the mantissa, and the exponent parts of floating-point representations of real number values in digital computational systems - simply put, calculators will ALWAYS have round-off error, due to the nature of floating-point representations, regardless of how many bits are allocated. Hence, why he is so mystified by how calculators do math. Every time he pulls his phone out to perform these parlor tricks, he is relying on the calculator's approximations and levels of precision with regard to floating-point values... more generally, he lacks an understanding of how we represent quantity using decimal digits, which are converted from binary digits (bits) in the calculator's operating system. Source:: I have a degree in Mathematics, a minor in Computer Science, and I have been a teacher of both mathematics and computer science for over a decade. I routinely cover topics like this (floating-point arithmetic and binary/decimal representations of quantity) with 15-16 year olds in my Introductory Computer Science course. Terrence Howard is incorrect in nearly all of his assertions, and he does not understand how numerical representation works, either digitally or in an analog sense. The square root of 2 demonstration as a "loop" is easily proven to be trivial using middle-school mathematical techniques of applying rules of exponents and simplifying expressions. Terrence Howard is a charlatan of the highest order. He has no idea what he is talking about.
@gianni_schicchi2 ай бұрын
Yes, it’s a floating point issue. You can use different data structures to remove that. such as storing it as a fraction in memory but that’s not how calculators choose to work. A more advanced calculator like a physics and graphing or accounting calculator most likely handles numbers in this manner.
@donovanetienne36112 ай бұрын
Biggest problem with the opposing arguments here is he claiming everything youve been taught is wrong and you’re saying he is wrong using the knowledge youve been taught so only thing is happening is a circle of arguments where nobody is really proved wrong or right everyone just claims they are right the other is wrong and nobody is disproving this stuff with experiments like science should be from the beginning we’ve been taught to form a hypothesis and try to disprove thats the bases of science but nobody is trying his models or even experimenting using his theories to try and disprove them they just say its waste of time because it goes against what we’ve known about everything for as long as we have been writing things down
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
precision without accuracy is the mathemagicians' folly, and the grifters' tool.
@jamescarver58762 ай бұрын
@@donovanetienne3611No, you’re under the impression that everything ever taught in class is taken at face value without question. But education is not the same as indoctrination. Educators don’t just say things in class. Things are explained and observed. In science classes, students run their own experiments and come to their own conclusions. This mindset that we’re being indoctrinated in schools is baseless.
@jamescarver58762 ай бұрын
It’s funny because here Terrence pretty much explains that the square root of 2 is 1.414…
@SupCortez2 ай бұрын
You both are fantastic hosts, fantastic questions and kudos to you for trying to help bridge new ideas with current understanding of such complex topics. Liked and brand new lifetime subscriber here. Going off to binge your other videos after this. Cheers
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@SupCortez this was a trainwreck. The hosts kept trying to push Terrance to say things that the hosts believed, things that Terrence didn't believe or didn't find important; nothing was elucidated; no details of his model were clarified beyond what he said preciously; none of his nonsense was challenged (some of it was endorsed!)
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 You can tell when the hosts are visibly uncomfortable with what Terrence is saying / how Terrence is acting. The second-hand embarrassment is palpable.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 I was just listening so I didn't see facial expressions, gestures, etc.; I did hear them actively agreeing with nonsense
@FirstNameLastName-tm4tg2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024his model was explained quite clearly in the time they had. Aether as the universal substance and atoms/matter as disturbances in this substance is good enough for me tho it obviously goes much deeper in the convo. He was challenged on math by Anastasia for like half an hour, r u sure u heard the thing?
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@FirstNameLastName-tm4tg anastasia's challenge included her surprise that 2*1.41 wasn't equal to 1.41*1.41 -- so, forgive me if I don't consider her attempt an adequate challenge
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the opportunity & love really…sending more right back…🫶 Keep it going!… #strongertogether💯 #terrencehoward is a genius IRT
@jasonbennett23492 ай бұрын
I want to be part of that breakaway civilization. Sign me up!
@kevinlemke94972 ай бұрын
You’re brilliant Terrence! You’re shaping our future! I will teach this to my 4 children once I fully understand it. I love and support everything you’re doing 🫶🏼 Sincerely a common man awakened from the societal crisis 😢
@chillywilly54122 күн бұрын
Please do not go near your children with this bullshit.
@DiAngeloTheSecond18 күн бұрын
That would be child abuse
@kevinlemke949718 күн бұрын
@ You’re irrelevant… have fun living in a lie your entire existence
@triviamp41492 ай бұрын
As Im looking & understanding this I feel this is why I didnt get math or physics or biology becauseI didnt have goo teaching but just watching this have helped me sooooooo much now I have a better understanding
@RONIN-11216 күн бұрын
I bet you do
@davidhenry79464 күн бұрын
None of this is factual. 😂
@mattpiper52782 ай бұрын
The basis of almost all of Terrence Howard’s foundational ideas are from a book called. The Kybalion. Kind of surprising to me that no one‘s really mentioned as far as I can see it.
@WizardSkyth2 ай бұрын
Indeed he's constantly parroting others often trying to pass them as his own, and when he doesn't and presents his own ideas it's utter nonsense.
@loopsky2 ай бұрын
I guess it's time to slowly realize we're living in the simulation with very limited free will. Enjoy the ride but don't get too attached. Most likely it's not your first rodeo.
@OneRudeBoy2 ай бұрын
@@loopsky I agree. But I think life should be enjoyable. It seems those in power are incapable of knowing how to throw a good time on Simulation Earth. Why?
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
Not familiar with THAT book, but I have read (and "peer reviewed", mostly for the entertainment of others) Mr. Howard's book... It's hot garbage.
@gambler01012 ай бұрын
That book is summing up the hermetic knowledge, it is not invented by Atkinson who wrote a book. Hermetic knowledge holds so many layers which we do not understand yet.
@leeturton62332 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing this one guys , really good listen .
@supermike21642 ай бұрын
KEY POINTS FOR ME: The concept of 1 needs to REALLY represent substantial reality #2 I understand the concept of ether #3 the language of multiply magnetism radiation and electrical. I was confused about the color tones and how sound corresponds with the elements.
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
@@supermike2164 you will get there…push thru…#tlc
@Tyler-xe6zj2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your hard work. New here and excited for more podcasts. 😬❤️
@salcorbit63302 ай бұрын
One of my favorite episodes so far. Even at three hours, I wish it had been longer. It would be great to have Terrence on again. Creative people have a capacity to reveal and understand some things about the world that non-creative people, hard as they may try, simply cannot. Would love to see more like this in the future. Thank you DSP!
@daarom34722 ай бұрын
they have an ability to form creative ideas. The danger about creativity is that (outside of art) it's usually wrong or misses significant parts. The standard model has been tested millions of times and explains a wide range of phenomena. It only fails at extremely small or large scales. A new theory should at least account for what the standard model accounts for then add extra understanding.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
This episode was a train wreck -- or maybe a better metaphor is.... A trip to a DMV designed by Escher
@johnlard4 күн бұрын
The confusion about multiplication regarding area can be solved by using units of measurement in mind. We say 1×1=1 and that seems weird when imagining how 1 is both the length and the area. But usually you'd say 1cm×1cm=1cm². Now we see the difference, as 1cm (the length of any side of the square) is not the same as 1cm² (the area of the square). In the same way, 3in×4in=12in². In this case, we have a rectangle with an area of 12in², not 12in.
@jausspacascuse2978Ай бұрын
Great conversation! I've been fascinated with Terrence and his interpretation of everything since hearing all of the backlash from cultured scientists that can't break their information foundation. I personally believe this "revelation" has come forth through him at the perfect time. He talks hypothetically teaching his physics the right way if the world was wiped out but in actuality, it is about to be. We are at the dawn of an A.I. revolution and if an A.I. were to be trained in this perspective it could revolutionize the future
@saschamarr49525 күн бұрын
Terrence is absolutely wrong about everything he says and does not understand basic mathematics ..nor has he ever gone to college and studied anything. The problem is that none of you people are scientifically literate.. you hear a buzzword and think "ah yes he must know what he is talking about" He is good at memorizing things, but has 0 understanding of the concepts. He does not even know what the decimal system in arithmetic is called!!! He calls it "the dewey decimal system"...which is a system of classifying books at the library! It is infuriating how mindless you folks are ...
@weaverlance2 ай бұрын
oh man! next level stuff guys! congrats!
@Grouiiiiik2 ай бұрын
I finally took the time to listen to the whole thing and it was better than I anticipated. In my opinion his fundamental model has some merit and it actually integrates very simply and beautifully with the electromagnetic forces. Also, he made predictions about a noble gas that should exist with the configuration : finding it would really add a ton of credibility to the model. Lastly he said something like everything over time loses energy and thus structurally changes, including light. It's very interesting and could be something to test.
@raycar1165Ай бұрын
Are you familiar with the electric universe model? Worth looking into, if you haven’t already. It’s most ardent proponent The Thunderbolts Project is featured first on my channel.
@jamescastro20372 ай бұрын
Probably one of the best interactions that would be expected for the furthering of human knowing the human. Great job. The artificial intelligence in the comments don't like a change in the program. Bits b glitchin.
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
Terrence Howard is glitching
@jamescastro20372 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 after reading your comments it seems like the only way you get information is from reading. Aka Data. And the only thing you are applying to Terrance is Data. If you struggle reading the world and think you know it by reading a book then, you are artificially intelligent.
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
@@jamescastro2037 Yes I do read a lot but I get information from a variety of sources and mediums, including talking with hundreds of people every day. Can you name even one thing from this podcast that you learned, or one thing that was worth listening to? (from Terrence)
@christopheryoungbeck88372 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 Troll
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 work at a call centre do you? p.s. the media is the message, mediums conjure up ghosts.
@adriennejubilee45502 ай бұрын
Thank you for this platform that allows people outside the scientific mainstream to share their ideas.
@jamescarver58762 ай бұрын
Sure keep sharing your baseless ideas. 😂
@adriennejubilee45502 ай бұрын
@@jamescarver5876Are you a frequent viewer of this podcast?
@AssuredServices2 ай бұрын
Definitely on to something. Everything is connected.🎯
@goldwhitedragon29 күн бұрын
The Buddhists have been saying this for 2,000 years. So...
@triviamp41492 ай бұрын
Yes please keep teaching & sharing this it's helping me & it's interesting
@nr70000000012 ай бұрын
Hello Anastasia, you talked about how you wanted to find the fundamental root frequency of the hydrogen spectral lines, and carbon, nitrogen. You also talked about magnetism and electricity being related in some sort of geometry. That triggered me, because there was a researcher called Gabriel laFreniere who could show this in a very visible manner (without using quaternions or Dirac equations or some sort) that it might be just a visble wave phenomenom, due to a lens effect - he is in the same wave-mechanical camp as Jeff Yee and dr. Milo Wolff.
@matthewhoch78523 күн бұрын
You know its hard out here for a pimp when you trying do the math to pay the rent
@brian71362 ай бұрын
What a great conversation! Thank you!
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
What did you take away from this interview?
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 Various clips worth making more commentary videos over
@brian71362 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 I am digesting, Terrance's mind is at a different level and I think he may be special? I will wait and see. I am a simple person, but i am trying to understand the universe we live in. I think they were respectful of each other.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@brian7136 they were respectful in the sense that they didn't explicitly insult one another. Unfortunately, that was one of the only positive aspects of the interview, I thought. Both Terrance and the interviewers proved they misunderstood child level mathematics (which, to be fair, most children don't understand on a fundamental level, since they merely memorized it by rote learning). In addition, the interviewers failed to solicit a single testable prediction from Howard, even though he made multiple claims about having testable predictions (that he never specified). I could go on but...
@TheWillmo652 ай бұрын
It won't take a thousand years, Shilo.. You have already had many guests on your podcast who are moving in the direction Mr Howard and his predecessorr, Dr Russell. / The male/female description in the lynchpin talk is very "I Ching" / This is a good discussion. Thanks to both of you and Mr Howard.
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
except the very notion of "the academy" instead of academia, the notion that teams invent things .. when solitary (many un-married, have time) tinkerers have done ALL of that part .. never Faraday et al, never Franklin, et al .. Shilo promotes anti-science by these, obviously progressive woke bs reset narratives, as if .. meanwhile Da Vinci taught more physics than Newton ever stole and made look like his own. Howard claims utter nonsense, often. Ninety Patents, if you include Trademarks and Copyrights == zero patents; trademarks for logos, product and brand names; copyrights on scripts, manuscripts, website content, and so on .. apparently nobody told him about the monetization of Industrial Designs .. (why your tail-light lens "costs" 245.45 +tx in USD) .. toys and trinkets, no products since 14 years is a clue
@akaROOSTA2 ай бұрын
Thank you for giving Terrence a chance to Free flow his ideas and what he’s actually proposing. This is a wonderful episode ❤
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
Did he share a single testable prediction, a single beneficial invention, or a single evidence-based novel idea?
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 he shared enough now it time to work…🫶#tlc I’m here for it!…#strongertogether💯
@akaROOSTA2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 the calculator goddamnit!!
@akaROOSTA2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 go through the patents and bring back worthy mentions please and thank you
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@akaROOSTA you're joking, right?
@zwanex2 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤, wow you guys have been best hosts to Mr Howard.
@ChuckUAsshole2 ай бұрын
Excellent conversation 💯
@sadiebaby7162Ай бұрын
I LOVE seeing T's growth in his expression of his ideas...beautiful words🥰 im here for it!!!
@jasonbennett23492 ай бұрын
I have so much love for this conversation. Greatful for the questions and thoughts and answers. Thank you for your show.
@flamealligator69842 ай бұрын
Gratitude for your loving respectful and insightful discussion with Terrence. 💙💙💙 Hope springs eternal in this episode. @Terrence: Keep it up! Love and support for you. 💫💙
@anthonybailey18062 ай бұрын
“The disagreement between Mr. Howard and Mr. Tyson highlights the importance of both observation and critical thinking in scientific inquiry. Mr. Howard’s focus on observation emphasizes the empirical evidence as the foundation for understanding the world, while Mr. Tyson’s criticism of those who didn’t look with their own eyes underscores the need for skepticism and critical evaluation. However, a crucial question that arises from this conversation is whether we are asking the right questions from our observations. Are we framing our inquiries in a way that allows us to uncover new insights or are we constrained by our existing assumptions and paradigms? By considering this question, we can foster a more open-minded and innovative approach to scientific exploration.”
@piscator_M1-172 ай бұрын
Bro Tyson is no scientist. Howard on the other hand is.
@weirdwolly4092 ай бұрын
@@piscator_M1-17 Ooooof how can someone be so incredibly wrong and be so confident about it...
@piscator_M1-172 ай бұрын
@weirdwolly409 10 papers vs 100 patents who's the better scientist again?
@weirdwolly4092 ай бұрын
@@piscator_M1-17 "Tyson is no scientist" you just said he wasn't a scientist at all... now you are asking who is a better scientist?? Hmmm. Tyson is the better scientist btw since he has done actual science. And he (unlike Howard) knows how many apples there are in one box which contains one apple.
@piscator_M1-172 ай бұрын
@weirdwolly409 No, he has taken other people's observations and commented on them. 10 times I give him a few good ones, and he is a hell of a speaker, but he hasn't created a new way of flight or a new way of shooting a gun or a Artificial digital environment like Terrence has. Just saying.
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
BTW I think having Don hoffman, Terrence and Ibrahim Karim discuss their geometric theories of Time-space and beyond , would reveal a lot because as far as I remember Ibrahim Karim explained how a vortex is somehow a fundamental shape in biogeometry.
@Jamesrwatsonx2 ай бұрын
Don Hoffman is delusional. Half of his views are rather delusional I mean.
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
making up new words for something ancient, to make it "sciency" is a tell, is a sign, is werdzalad .. meanwhile vortex or torus ? he doesn't specify, only muddify and mystify or sumply doesn't know, and you don't know because he never says .. but these things can be known ...
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
@@williiayummjay regarding “torus or vortex?”, doesn’t really matter. Check out toroidal vortices or vortex rings and their instabilities.
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
@@Jamesrwatsonx find more advanced devaluation techniques, gaslighting is too basic for us. Always consider the audience.
@Jamesrwatsonx2 ай бұрын
@ShH-3119 Haha, sure. I wouldn't bother. The majority of you smart guys don't have as much gas as you'd like to think. Besides, if I tilted your perspective just a teeny bit, It'd change your whole outlook on his whole 'headset' thesis, trust me.
@OneRudeBoy2 ай бұрын
Why does Anastasia and Shilo seem to understand Terrence Howard, but nobody else does? Personally, I can’t grasp anything Terrence is saying, however, I have an excellent bs meter and it tells me what he is demonstrating has value.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
Sadly, it may be that they're as dumb as him, whereas others aren't. If I give you one apple, one time, how many apples do you have? 1 apple, 1 time.. 1*1 is....
@Ian-p6w2p2 ай бұрын
Clearly your bs meter needs work all he Terrence does is spew word salad and fail elementary school math
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
They seem to because it's a talk show .. alienate the guest, within arm's length no less ? you think Shilo ever got punched in the mouth ? Anastasia probably did, maybe a few times .. because she can dish it out but fails to, because equanamity is a mindet that people within reach of nutters (and high-strung horses) adopt, and he's looking for a unversity to fund + they're looking for funder fodder. do the math
@OneRudeBoy2 ай бұрын
@@Ian-p6w2p CLEARLY Anastasia and Shilo are understanding him. Means you don’t respect them either.
@piscator_M1-172 ай бұрын
Because what he is saying makes perfect scenes.
@triviamp41492 ай бұрын
I really like the display & demonstration
@Gebwalter2 ай бұрын
I missed the Mitch Hedberg quote the 1st watch through, hilarious injection!!!
@LovesoundsForever2 ай бұрын
I love you Terrence Howard! thank you guys for this podcast
@LovesoundsForever2 ай бұрын
Next conversation how to include more of the capacity of our society capability to understand because of the poison in our diet.
@vicvic20812 ай бұрын
God bless you guys
@michaelheil-ij5ji2 ай бұрын
Loved this discussion So very insightful and helpful If we could get beyond the concept that structure/ organization implies stuff, and not configurational movement, aka vortices of interacting motion, we could make real progress in understanding the universe. Shilo, with his tangible metaphorical actors, ie atoms, fibers, particles(Oh but I hate the word particle!), kept pulling Terrance back to paleo physics, disallowing a deeper conversation to develop. But….I appreciate so much you both bringing this to us, making us think. You guys are a gift. And thanks for the slight jog back to physics. Much more fun than the metaphysical/ spiritual/mystical direction the project is drifting toward. Don’t give up the fight by falling prey to carriers of these, at base, unsupportable and lazily conceived notions. Hang tough.
@triviamp41492 ай бұрын
If I had teachers like rhis I would want to stay focus in to learn more but I also feel I'm at a different place in my life so I can grap more to want to knkw more & more Thank you for this😂
@rh0msfer44329 күн бұрын
Terrance isn't a teacher, he's a moron, if you want to unlearn basic maths and physics then continue listening, Terrance provides no proof of anything, he continually lies and has no written peer reviewed theory on anything he states as fact. No evidence. He's so stupid he can't even express his theories in math because he's so dumb he doesn't even understand the basics of math, instead he simply talks shite. He's the definition of word salads, he uses words together that make no sense because he doesn't even understand the meaning of half the words he uses. I'm here for the lols, listening to him is priceless.
@Crow-p3yАй бұрын
the passion in this episode and conversation excites me so much for the future .. gained a new fan 💯
@triviamp41492 ай бұрын
I like to learn more om these topics
@teokennedy97852 ай бұрын
Thank you for different perspectives!
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
Is it just me or has anyone else noticed the similarity between Terrence geometric theory of everything and Don Hoffman’s dynamic geometric theory of consciousness?! I think it would be great to have them both and see how these two theories may converge. BTW do I need to mention that from these two theories, I personally and for the Nth time come to this conclusion that consciousness is fundemental and actively participates in creating forms in time-space. The third key note that I derived from this great episode was that maybe the fundemental “form” or “constitution block” of time-space is sth similar to a vortex.
@stoneneils2 ай бұрын
I don't want debate..i want demonstration. If their physics can't do anything new I'm already bored.
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
@@stoneneilsI see, and I highly recommend you find ways to cope with the boredom because scientists are not there to entertain you. If you don’t like and find it unnecessary to first go through these debates, you always have this alternative option to seek higher states of arousal elsewhere like watching TV. And remember, on your way back to watch TV, if you ever hit a wall, you always have this option to return and take an alternative path to lead u to the point rather than getting stuck behind the wall as NPCs do, and hitting it in a thousand samurai ways, in hope that if they hit the wall with a different point of view, it will disappear even if takes an eternity and the whole cycle-system to annihilate. We are not even a type 1 civilisation yet and we are going to extinct while we are stuck behind the walls. You want demonstrations? Its already in front of you, you just need to adjust the tuning system (if u r equipped with one). And seeing is not comprehending especially at the level of manipulating that u desire. So work on your patience ‘cause there is a long way to go .If you want to manipulate time-space you need to first decode what is beyond it not doing the reverse engineering which is taking an eternity meh…
@ShH-31192 ай бұрын
@@mitchellhayman381 why don’t u go check out cognitive biases?! (Please don’t reply back, it’s rhetorical.)your emphasis on the word “never” which was unnecessary btw, was alarming.
@colton_936Ай бұрын
Exploring new ideas is always genius. Keep it up Terrence.
@truthseeker48412 ай бұрын
Someone give this man a Nobel Prize!
@weirdwolly4092 ай бұрын
for Stupidity? I don't think that's a valid category "truthseeker". Someone who can't figure out how many apples are in one box containing one apple shouldn't be taken seriously.
@adriennejubilee45502 ай бұрын
Forgive me if someone has already commented on this. I was wondering if Shilo was referring to Le Sage's wave theory of push gravity 1:43:20. I think its focus is on opposing gravitational forces influencing the movement of physical objects, and Terrence Howard's theory focuses on how opposing electromagnetic waves create matter. I also think that Tom Van Flandern proposed how light density and the ability of some corpuscles that are responsible for creating gravity in Le Sage’s theory could solve the thermodynamic problems associated with it.
@A_li345672 ай бұрын
You should do a podcast with Ibrahim Karim of Biogeometry
@daycrow86512 ай бұрын
they absolutly should .
@DemystifySci_Podcast2 ай бұрын
We'll check him out. thanks
@andrewanderson1612 ай бұрын
This was just awesome ❤ he doesn't have to be 💯 correct...but it's a breath of fresh air 👍🏼
@mariogonzales97522 ай бұрын
I'm really really enjoying this conversation, thank you
@jamest168Ай бұрын
Loved the discussion. Have to listen again with full attention. But I think Terrence is on to something.
@squeakytoyrecords17022 ай бұрын
@The DemystifySci Podcast First and foremost, thank you for having Terrence on your show and the willingness to learn. For this you have got a new subscriber. @2:21:00 You discussed the frequency of Hydrogen. The frequency of any object is its resonant frequency. To find the resonant frequency, you bombard the target with sound while monitoring the frequency response of the target. The peak with the highest amplitude is the fundamental frequency as it is constructive coupling and interfering with the material. Regarding sound, things that can be heard within the human hearing spectrum are generally classified as sound. However, every frequency in the electromagnetic spectrum is both sound and light. In regards to creating hydrogen from sound. Yes, sound is the correct signal source. Furthermore, the sound will need to be a specific geometry and point source. A geometrically structured coherent phaser beam would do the trick. Let me know if you need to borrow one;).
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
except for the pesky sound of one hand clapping, in vacuum .. that is .. fundamental mistake to make electricity and light synonymous, and Walter Russel did that but none of these people have done the work on the Russel ideas, let alone his geometric mapping of sets .. which have all been superceded by more useful maps, rightly so. Edwin Kaal has been on and Unzicker too .. ya really think Unzicker would stand for this ? == he publicly callled out the King of String as a fraud and charlattan .. to his face! courage is more important than consensus, in science
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
@@squeakytoyrecords1702 agreed & you as well…love how this thing is growing!…🫶#tlc
@bobann356621 күн бұрын
Tesla said light is a sound wave of the aether.
@squeakytoyrecords170220 күн бұрын
@@bobann3566 Absolutely!
@GalatraicMinds2 ай бұрын
I love this here. Yall shhowed him love and respect. Im sure he was very very comfortable in your space. Thank you for allowing himbto speak his mind and thoughts and give his visual understanding of what is and isnt. I respect your channel. I will be a new subscriber for sure much peace
@raycar1165Ай бұрын
When you get a chance, check out their interview with Wal (Wallace) Thornhill. It’s very good. As are most of them.
@daycrow86512 ай бұрын
The fact yall as academics welcomed howard instead of “ putting him in his place “ solidified this as my absolute favorite scifi podcast. i really do love yall. We really do not see many , if any , self taught black people in science so this really means a lot. What terrance was attempting to speak about on rogan lines up with Immanuel Velikovsky though i’m not sure he is aware of this
@daarom34722 ай бұрын
wtf does this have to do with him being black? He's just not read enough to truly know what he's talking about. Followed this podcast for a long time but this is an unsub for me.
@salcorbit63302 ай бұрын
Good thing we have the disinformation police to set us straight. Without enlightened authoritarians shutting down conversations we will never improve our understanding.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
This interview was a trainwreck of grandiose delusion and stupidity
@ichigokurosaki28382 ай бұрын
@daarom3472 the person just said he doesn't see much black ppl self taught in the field of science. I don't think he was going for anything beyond that. But let's be real, we live in the real world and blacks have been treated differently in many fields but he wasn't diverting the convo to that.
@daarom34722 ай бұрын
@@ichigokurosaki2838 there arent any self taught people in the field of hard science full stop. It's simply too hard to properly learn it yourself from scratch (perhaps a dozen or do exceptions). So obviously if there aren't any, there also aren't going to be black people either. The OP is insinuating that the treatment of this actor has something to do with his skin, it does not.
@HwTz111118 күн бұрын
I hope you guys will have him again after he makes progress with his project. Time will tell if Terrence is right and I am definitely paying attention because it’s the smart thing to do.
@mikxyas2 ай бұрын
Thank you for reminding me that the universe is beautiful ❤️
@rmschindler1442 ай бұрын
thank you for making this comment ♥
@gabemasson2 ай бұрын
That was fucking great. You guys. Seriously. Thank you so much for this show!
@adamf.98352 ай бұрын
Great job!👍
@wadeodonoghue18872 ай бұрын
There are levels of understanding to things like Money: Level 1 : I use it to get what I want. Level 2: everyone uses it get what they want. Level 3: it's social lubrication to get people to give each other what they want. Level 4: It keeps record of past and future wants, indefinitely, Money doesn't rot but all life does. Etc... Most people don't seek deeper understanding, you don't need to understand Money to use it. I feel Terrence is speaking on a higher Scientific level, I don't agree that the lower levels are now "useless" however I am also open to deeper levels of understanding.
@PCG20222 ай бұрын
I would love to see Terrence and Malcolm bendall together in a room. When he speaks of curvature, I hear Malcolm say the same thing and describe the Zero and 12 on a clock as the same but can't be. Malcolm has found the zero point in plasmoids so putting these 2 together would be amazing. Loving the video so far, I'm an hour and 42 minutes in, Great work. PCG
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
Bendall? Carlson? .. neither one studied Bernouilli, let alone Alven or Langmuir ..
@PCG20222 ай бұрын
@williiayummjay Malcolm Bendall? Not Carlson? But either way, so what? The thunderstorm generator works regardless of your snide comment. (Verified). 🖕
@magir002Ай бұрын
Thanks for striking the eloquent balance between oversimplification and scientific tangent deep dive, I was able to follow 😅 This is such a treasure! Good luck ratifying this into the Bible and other books for the future
@cperterpan68602 ай бұрын
We can't advance because we refuse to be corrected. Instead, we react like children to correction.
@yyyhhh848118 күн бұрын
we have hit a roadblock because of ego
@tiko2wish7 күн бұрын
That's the flower of life. Thank You Terrance, I'm here because I've been following your progress and this is the most detailed video that I've seen so far, vary exciting. Thank You DemystifySci for hosting this....I subscribed lol
@greggkroodsma81972 ай бұрын
What excites me is the concept of the word 'foundation' and I put the concept together with the concept of religion, the basis. The foundation is something that can be placed in or on. Maybe you could call it a presented unexpressed blueprint. The 'matrix,' maybe? When speaking of the wave, I think of the direction of the way, the way directive. Corpuscles, bubbles, steam, vapor, etc. Those words are so refreshingly meaningful. The Rock of the Earth had a foundation laid on it. The corpuscle of the Earth was situated in a foundation. Isaiah 48:13 Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together. So, the foundation is a something that can be 'stood up' like a frame. I guess that something was called 'ether.' The foundation is an ether that responds. When the I am of you calls upon the ether to respond, the ether expresses itself together with the surround. (That was an immediate input of information after listening for just 16 minutes.) Now I am speaking of the psychological nature. When Terrence describes harmonic nodes, that could illustrate the seven Chakras down the spine. Oh, so exciting! Electricity and Magnetism. Quantum electrodynamics. The picture that forms in my visual cortex that flows in the wave of quantum dynamics is of the left-brain and the right-brain and the myriad fibrous connections between the two. There is no other structured element or thing in the outer world that is made of anything that the brain is. The old-timey fan engines with the tight winding chords of copper wires are a close illustration of a brain performing one task. A fan on a stand is just a person doing one thing. It breaks, you throw it away. That has evolved into the psychology of war. "Marge, the fan 's not workin'." "Is it plugged in?" Hmmm . . . Are you plugged in to the ether? Floride. Oh boy! White teeth! Too much Floride will eat your teeth for dinner. But, breathing too high of a concentration of Oxygen will kill you, see. There is a foundation, a pattern, a matrix. It's like a well-defined surfboard that rides the waves. The waves are created by the harmony of the ether and you, the I am. The point of the interaction between the concepts of left and right, up and down, in and out. Drifting out of the dimension. Let's go with the concepts of Chakras, energy centers, and the brain. People try to 'activate' their Chakras by listening to sounds, the Solfeggio frequencies. That does ergonomically create patterns that correspond to the harmonious interactions of the elements. A tempo, a speed, a vibration. Gravity creates archetypes, language. Gravity is like the force bouncing off the wall.
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
Foundation is not unexpressed blueprint. But.. hm let say - The Principle of Incommensurability - is. Nice paragraph from fractalwoman "Counter-space, Space, Fractal In the beginning was counter-space, and god said “let there be space”. Space and counter-space are incommensurate principles. Counter-space is not space and space is not counter-space. Space is the absence of counter-space and vice versa. Counter-space and space form a conjugate relationship which is responsible for the phenomenon known as fractal. In nature, fractals appear BETWEEN the domains of space and counter-space. Counter-space is what is missing from the language of modern physics. Counter-space is the missing piece of the puzzle. Without the concept of counter-space, unification is impossible."
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
"The picture that forms in my visual cortex that flows in the wave of quantum dynamics is of the left-brain and the right-brain and the myriad fibrous connections between the two." haaa. to protal/window to akash/intuition/whatever literally opens up between brainsides. for a period of time, when under energy torture, i accidentally learned how to go level up, an see how it "visually works". now i have some uncanny connection to other side and truths comes trough sometimes. Usually after i detect BS, then correct data comes through. Its like searching for the book in the library. At least one keyword would be nice ;-) The more bs around the lies, the more easily is also truth is also visible/accessible. I have an erie feeling that language and fake concepts keeps the door to akash looked. You cant search for things that is not there. if you wanna know, lets take it somewhere else, they dont let me talk here in details. Forbidden. Im a forbidden dude. :D
@greggkroodsma81972 ай бұрын
@@v2ike6udik Principle of Incommensurability . . . not apples and oranges, but nothing of one in the other. Like darkness and shining.
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
@@greggkroodsma8197 "Darkness, Light, Colour In the beginning was darkness, and god said “let there be light”. Darkness and light are incommensurate principles. Light is not darkness and darkness is not light. Darkness is the absence of light, and vice versa. Darkness and light form a conjugate relationship resulting in phenomenon we perceive as colour. Every colour of light oscillates at a different frequency. Frequency is BETWEEN darkness and light. Light oscillates BETWEEN space and counter-space." :)
@v2ike6udik2 ай бұрын
@@greggkroodsma8197 "Deterministic, Unpredictable, Chaos In the beginning was deterministic, and god said “let there be unpredictable”. Deterministic and unpredictable are incommensurate principles. Deterministic is not unpredictable and vice versa. Chaos, as in chaos theory, is the conjugate of determinism and unpredictability. In mathematics, chaotic systems are both unpredictable and deterministic. Although the output of a chaotic equation is completely determined by its input parameters, the output value cannot be predicted with any certainty. Chaos is BETWEEN these two incommensurate principles. This is why chaos is closely related to fractal geometry. Fractals appear BETWEEN incommensurate states."
@PewPewPetal14 күн бұрын
2:32:50 The flower of life c:
@dannygordon2062 ай бұрын
I am mathematically incompetent , i am scientifically retarded , i used to think physics was a carbonated beverage..i mean for god sakes i have a GED to boast my academic qualifications. That said…I’d love for you guys to suspend any ontological bias you might reserve for just a moment and hear me out. For the last nine years i have been pushing, pulling, swiping, and spinning paper, straws, pencils and empty cokes cans across a work bench in a back garage…without touching them, that’s right folks..drum roll..TELEKINESIS. This is what i would love for you all absorb and convey to Terrence if don’t mind? The mechanics of visualization techniques by which i use to manipulate these objects funny enough is eerily similar & i mean eeeeeeerily similar to this cosmic tapestry that Terrence has been trying tirelessly to explain. Folks…the Aether is absolutely real, it is more than we could possibly ever imagine!!! My first time to watch this podcast and probably my 20th time to watch Terrence. I LOVE IT !!!
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
I'd love to see some demonstrations of your telekinesis!
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@dannygordon206 video please
@dannygordon2062 ай бұрын
I’ve seen some of your post . I’ll admit, i don’t know if your trolling or if your being sincere 😆🤭🫣?? Nevertheless my friend, i’ll be working on getting some footage together in the near future. I tried sharing my findings years ago with the closest people in my orbit , like…up close & personal & in your face kind of sharing. And of course people were like …”ehhhh🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♀️” I’m like wtf 🤦🏻♂️🤣😂??? So my point being, if the people i love most for one reason or another were unavailable to this experience then my thoughts were always “who would give a shit about a video?” Times are changing & i’m feeling more & more of a need to reach out. Tag me back with at least a thumbs up or if it makes you feel a little more confident..a thumbs up & a middle finger & i will see to it that you receive a proper introduction of my self and the work i’m doing 🙏.
@jamescarver58762 ай бұрын
@@dannygordon206You don’t have telekinetic abilities obviously. It would be super simple to demonstrate to friends and family but you didn’t. Don’t know why you’re lying
@Aufpassen672 ай бұрын
@@dannygordon206id much appreciate an instruction as well!
@ArionRace7 күн бұрын
I think Terrance has the system bent over,I pray he gets to stick it in & wiggle it around for all of us. Stay safe Terrance🙏❤️.
@petershelton736719 күн бұрын
The problem as I see it is that science as a field of knowledge and discovery has become wedded to the world of economics and is not distinct from technology which only cares about the manipulation of matter rather than fundamental understanding. This issue dates from the Copenhagen Interpretation which refused to allow any philosophy of mind to enter into what was clearly no longer a description of a material reality. 😂 So now there is a void of explanatory theory in an age of disinformation. I don’t actually think Terrance is particularly gifted in this area but kudos to him for having the courage to share his ideas. 🎉
@matthewhoch78523 күн бұрын
I really do believe that Terrance is a very knowledgeable man and means well and wants great things. Also he is responsible for the new jersey drone situation 😂😂
@keevancrawford67082 ай бұрын
He’s explaining 5D after suggesting 4D is the observation (or perspective) of the 3D models.
@hollaadieewaldfeee2 ай бұрын
🙂 Speed, velocity = frequency! For example, the speed of sound and the speed of light are carrier frequencies of media, e.g. aether;-)
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
speed = rate; velocity = rate & direction; frequency = cadence, periodicity ... the academy needs more you
@hollaadieewaldfeee2 ай бұрын
@@williiayummjay Take a look again, please;-) The academic not needs more you;-)
@jessieadore2 ай бұрын
Oh you know it’s boutta get real when the sleeves come off 40 min in 😭😭
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
Hilarious
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
It's weird watching him in his wifebeater.... especially since that particular style of shirt describes him perfectly.
@megamond2 ай бұрын
Or when he raises his voice - does he think he's on "The View"?
@ichigokurosaki28382 ай бұрын
@jamesdelapena5648 It's interesting seeing the energy you have towards Terrance Howard. Tell us how you really feel?
@jamesdelapena56482 ай бұрын
@@ichigokurosaki2838 lol, I've been covering Terrence Howard on my YTchannel (this one I'm commenting from) for quite a while now. I'm somewhat of a Terrence Howard biographer, as a hobby.
@raycar1165Ай бұрын
I’m so far behind … I didn’t even realize this or the formscapes interviews were up. Much ❤ Love 🌏🌎🌍☯️⚡️ Terra 🌞 Pax
@Jamesrwatsonx2 ай бұрын
Terence Howard's idea that "one times one equals two" is a metaphor highlighting the limitations of our current, linear and non linear mathematical models. These traditional approaches fail to fully capture the complexity of reality, particularly in the context of interconnected dimensions of space and time. Symbols and equations in these models represent aspects of reality but cannot account for the full depth and potential states of a system. To move beyond these limitations, we need three-dimensional models, powered by technologies like quantum computing and AI, which can accommodate complexity, interconnectedness, and dynamic states. Howard’s intuition points to an evolution in understanding that many have sensed but struggled to articulate. As intelligence evolves with new technologies, his vision will prove true, showing that our old linear and non linear systems were inadequate for understanding the full depth of existence. Those who dismissed his ideas will soon see their limitations. Those who clowned him will be the clowns in the end.
@jamescarver58762 ай бұрын
It’s not a metaphor. He wrote an entire book trying to prove it and then sent his work to NDT. He only recently started calling it a metaphor. Just because Terrence said it was a metaphor to save face doesn’t make it true.
@Jamesrwatsonx2 ай бұрын
@jamescarver5876 I understand, but don't assume I'm saying it's a metaphor because he started claiming it's a metaphor. I'm saying it's a metaphor because it is a metaphor and has metaphorical implications as we move towards more holistically evolved systems of understanding.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@Jamesrwatsonxyou are a fish -- metaphorically.
@Jamesrwatsonx2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 And you’re being watched, not metaphorically.
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@Jamesrwatsonx literally
@ellan787116 күн бұрын
Brilliant conversation! Terrence is mindblowing, just as Walter Russell. Their theories do make so much more sense, than Quantum Physics and nonsense mathmatics. Really great work from you both! Thank you!!!
@Lolleka2 ай бұрын
He must have had a lot of fun 3D printing those fancy blocks. There's enough material for a modern art installation.
@chrismonksellye46082 ай бұрын
He makes them by hand one at a time.
@christopherandrews38622 ай бұрын
I understand his efforts especially on the dimension field. Aether is the lubricant that makes frequencies have higher dynamics in life and spirit.
@RogueElement.Ай бұрын
Terrence truly has a world view 200 years ahead of most people. His thought process is more in line with cutting edge dr.Michael Levins.
@rubstroll121 күн бұрын
Not 200, 210 most likely 😮
@matthewhoch78523 күн бұрын
I met Terrance Howard and now we have become close friends. He frequently Flys his drones to my house sorry about all the new jersey issues
@MarkoTManninen2 ай бұрын
Wow. Terrence Howard here and Weinsteinses at the channel of Prof. Dave. Will be a long night to replay both few times.
@curiousfella40762 ай бұрын
That title though re Prof Dave what in the world. Hope it's not just telescoping and guilt by association. edit: From an AI summary: "Bret Weinstein's controversial claims regarding medical science, specifically his belief that all drug testing is invalid due to lab mice having longer telomeres than wild mice. The video points out that this idea is irrelevant since drugs undergo clinical trials on human subjects before reaching the market. " Not off to a good start. Bret's argument is that regeneration is enhanced and cancer fighting is diminished in those rats. Not actually about telomeres. And so are drugs tested for their long term effects in terms of elevating cell damage and e.g. heart damage risk with that? I have my doubts. Anyway cheers.
@DemystifySci_Podcast2 ай бұрын
I'm afraid the day is coming when we too will face the Himmler of sci-tube
@MarkoTManninen2 ай бұрын
@@DemystifySci_Podcast Well, props for your courage and keeping open discussion going on.
@DemystifySci_Podcast2 ай бұрын
@@MarkoTManninen who was it that said 'no publicity is bad publicity?' I say bring it
@sadface74572 ай бұрын
@MarkoTManninen "Prof" dav has a very superficial understanding of science.
@omekafalconburn9202Ай бұрын
I think he’s been reading some Bucky Fuller, science is getting exciting again
@dallylang2 ай бұрын
I enjoyed this podcast. The best picture, for me, is a 360 degrees of point of views. The best picture of things include every angles. Interesting discussion.
@Anyon-z2s29 күн бұрын
Except quantum mechanical structures and molecules have a wider angle of incidence relative to a full rotation of 1080°
@gideonappleseed96322 ай бұрын
Yo been waiting for more terence
@supermike21642 ай бұрын
THIS CONVERSATION IS AWESOME ❤❤❤!!!!
@chriss443218 күн бұрын
Its a joke - He's clueless - stop feeding him your energy
@MatthewDieterjr29 күн бұрын
Thank you for letting Terrance on the show to show the world how it actually works. By the way I had to restart my phone to even make a comment. You're going to get Shadow banned for sure much love thank you ❤
@sadface74572 ай бұрын
I think the structured either might explain part of physics that we haven't even been able to incorporate like psychic and conciousness
@francis55182 ай бұрын
Yyyyeeesssss
@bobann356621 күн бұрын
Ken Wheeler loves to use "burning down the haystack to find the needle" and collecting the bits of gold from the "matrix".
@Stonecrusher3112 ай бұрын
Incredible. I've been trying to tell people there is only point a and point b, but no straight lines for years. This man has created a tool to explain the fabric that should be getting taught to every child in the world. Can someone please design an app for this modeling tool
@chrismonksellye46082 ай бұрын
argos.vu/V3D/THP/_Prints_3/_Prints_3.html
@williiayummjay2 ай бұрын
sodium chloride, basalt columns, straight along a spiral path looks circular from one presepctive, sinusoidal from another, and linear from another, concurrently .. top down; normal to the path; along for the ride ..
@RayUp2 ай бұрын
@@Stonecrusher311 I’m here for more #tlc…let’s go!…#strongertogether💯
@georgereid6216Ай бұрын
Thank you Terrence.You filled a lot of gaps for me.