Listen on the go at all podcast locations: anchor.fm/demystifysci Material solutions to quantum spookiness: www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Short films @DemystifySciInvestigates: kzbin.info/door/UfzVdgNu2xLThgM2qQZmSQ
@babylundun3 ай бұрын
STATE = CHIRCH SCIENCE = RELIGION THEORY = THEOLOGY THEORIST = THEOLOGIAN ATHEIST = THEIST ANTITHESIS = THESIS EDUCATION = INDOCTRINATION SO WHEN I DID MEET WITH PRINCIPALS, PROFESSORS, PREVOSTS, PRESIDENTS OF SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES THEY ALWAYS ASK ABOUT ACCREDITATION OR CREDENTIALS 💭 🤔 MY RESPONSE IS YES I HAVE TAUGHT INDEPENDENTLY AT SCHOOLS K - 12, I.E., CURRICULUM CONSULTATION AND ACADEMIA PRESENTATION, ETC. AND EVEN TAUGHT IN CONSULTED WITH PREACHERS OR PASTORS AND PRESENTED IN CHURCHES. TO THE MEMBERS, THEN I ASK HOWEVER, WHAT DOES ACCREDITATION AND CREDENTIALS HAVE TO DO WITH ME, AN INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER INVESTIGATOR PRESENTING PAPERS ON AN OPEN PROBLEM FOR PEER REVIEW 📃 ✍️🏿 ? AND HOW DOES ACCREDITATION OR CREDENTIALS PROMOTE OR PREVENT ME BEING PEER REVIEWED, PUBLISHING PROCUREMENT (VENDOR, SOLICITATION), OR PATENTS (COPY RIGHTS)? AND BESIDES THAT I SAY TO THE STAFF IF I WERE ACCREDITED AS FACULTY AND CREDENTIALED AS STAFF OR EVEN ENROLLED AS A STUDENT THEN JUST AS THEY ARE WITHOUT IDEA OR SOLUTION I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SOLVE THE OPEN PROBLEMS THAT I HAVE, I.E., ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION, PRIME PAIR GAP CONJECTURES, PRIME PATTERN FOR PERIODICITY, PRIMALITY TESTER PRIME CHECKER, PRIME COUNTING FUNCTIONS, ZETA OF S AND OR PI OF X, A NONDETERMINISTIC POLYNOMIAL TIME FORMULA FOR FIGURING AND FACTORING REALS AND PRIMES, ..... I ALSO HAVE NEW NUMBERS AND NUMERALS, NEW NUMBER LINES AND GRAPH LINES, NEW ORDERS OF OPERATIONS,, NEW SOLUTIONS TO UNKNOWN PROBLEMS.... I HAVE SOLVED AND PROVED THE QUASI RIDDLE OF THE BARBER OF ALL NOT BARBERS PARADOX A.K.A. THE SET OF ALL NOT SETS AND THE PSEUDO PARADOX OF THE LIAR OF ALL LIARS PARDOX A.K.A. THE SET OF ALL SETS .... THE REAL OPEN HARD PROBLEM IS NOT SOLVING PROBLEMS OR PROVING SOLUTIONS, THE REAL OPEN HARD PROBLEM IS SHOWING PEOPLE THE PROBLEM IS SOLVED AND PROVING TO PEOPLE THE SOLUTION IS THE PROOF. DR. NEELY FULLER SAID, THE SYSTEM , RANK AND FILE WILL IGNORE ANYONE WITH VITAL INFORMATION UNTIL PEOPLE START TO LISTEN AND THEN THE SYSTEM BREAKS THE PEOPLE UP AND OR BREAKS THE PERSON DOWN.... MY MOTO IS TO: 1) CREATE CURRICULUM 2) CHALLENGE THE SYSTEM 3) COMPETE WITH THE SYSTEM 4) CHAMPION ACADEMIA "YOU CHANGE PEOPLE'S MINDS; YOU CHANGE SYSTEM WIDE." P.S. THERE IS NO WAY I WOULD SAY ALL OF THIS TO TELL A LIE.... THE PUBLIC IS INDOCTRINATED WITH RELIGION AND EGUCATED WITH SCOENCE... FOR INSTANCE, MASS MEDIA, MUSIC, MOVIES, MAGAZINES AND OTHER MEDIUMS CONTROL THE EMOTIONS AND MANIPULATE THE MINDS OF THE MASSES THUS THE PEOPLE DO NOT THINK FOR THEMSELVES AND DO NOT TEACH FOR THEMSELVES.... THE MATH MESSAGE PROMOTED TO THE PUBLIC IS IN JOKES AND JINGLES, SUCH AS: "ASK SIRI HOW TO DIVIDE BY ZERO." IT IS A JOKE. ASK A PROFESSOR, TEACHER , PASTOR OR PREACHER OR EVEN ASK MATH EXPERT AND THEY ALL GIGGLE AND SAY "YOU CAN'T DIVIDE BY ZERO." LIKE ITS A JINGLE. IF YOU ASK WHY NOT THEY ALL SAY "ZERO DIVIDE BY ZERO IS INDETERMINANT AND OR ANY NUMBER DIVIDE BY ZERO IS UNDEFINE. THEIR RESPONSE MERELY RESTATES THE OPEN PROBLEM "TO DETERMINE AND DEFINE ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION. ZERO DENOMINATOR DIVISION UNDEFINED DOES NOT MEAN UNDEFINABLE.... 💭 🤔 LASTLY, THE PEOPLE PUT TOO MUCH FAITH AND BELIEF INTO THE SYSTEM AND BOARD,: RANK AN FILE.... TRUTHFULLY, dantepittman19@gmail.cpm @DemystifySci, contact me if you are interested in said meta closed solutions to said proto open problems.
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
sup guys, smee again :D The one who teased you about your owl :P Anyhow. Lets still assume you are not the bad guys. Meantime - some progress. I managed to suck Even More Data (TM) out of the akash (idk how many pieces i have now, it´s wild). I`m unable to talk about it as it gets wiped everywhere :D Wanna know before the manage to wipe me out too? So i must be close to smth important. _Wanna talk?_ Anyhow, cause you were the practicing scientists, by any change do you remember some formulas with the power/root of 16? (Currently im looking at Clifford algebra, smthsmth about rank 16, but the sci jargon is too strong for me to decode Witten´s 230 pages... yeah and i have no interest learning the jargon). Imagine my formula being 100.00% correct, and 70y old formulas are 30% off the chart (aka false explanation formulas - probably for science deception). I just dont know how power/root of 16 "works". If you are interested, prep large pot of liquids. :)
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
idk if i pushed you while ago to mock the word "particle" at every step you can, but keep doing it :D A few week ago i accidentally broke some "materialist" with mirror questions. He red pilled himself, told me his brain is broken now :D (before he was "soulless".) Maybe it was easy to break him because he could actually see auras. idk... But he had really hard time that "someone"/some process lets me to see the (probable) future, to cancel nasty timelines. A few lifelines have been canceled that way. I wish i didnt, as one was my own. Look at this dumb world, ffs.
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
Serious question: y'all both have PhD's in the Sciences from Columbia!! Are you really buying Terrence Howard's nonsense? I'd invite you to read his book; it's very poorly written, full of contradictions and logical fallacies... It's such a terrible book. What are y'all's opinion about his book?
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
1:22:50 I don't like how Terrence Howard keeps cutting off Anastasia here, when she challenged him on his mathematical errors. He gish gallups like crazy, changing the subject and tossing some word salads, even laughing right in her face. He's so rude. Anastasia, you were totally right in this segment of the interview, about how dimensionality of units matter! 1 square foot is not the same as 1 foot! They represent different concepts! (Area vs. length), but they're both defined to be of unit size. Sorry Terrence was so rude to you!
@darius69173 ай бұрын
it's hard out here for a mathematical theorist
@WilliamNobleBonninActual3 ай бұрын
Numbers are supposed to do the work for you. You’re doing it wrong Seems easy to me
@santerisatama54093 ай бұрын
My hobby is foundations of mathematics (reading Proclus' commentary on Euclid now). I don't fully agree with Howard, but I find his ideas fresh and fruitful and a good opening for having a genuine discussion on ontology etc. philosophy of mathematics. According to Proclus' Platonism, the only non-hypothetical (or as some would say today, non-axiomatic) science is the Dialectical science (ie. Philosophy). Mathematics is empirical (intuitive) science with special place between dialectical science and other sciences on one hand, and between 'nous' (and theology) and phenomenology on the other hand. I'd like to hear what's hard for you here. Myself, I don't believe that numbers really exist (they are just results of tally operations), and my foundational view is operational and relational process ontology of mathematics also in the ideal domain (intuitionism instead of modern/Gödel's Platonism).
@JamesDimond-l7u3 ай бұрын
Bc math explains nothing skippy
@Lolleka3 ай бұрын
real
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@santerisatama5409 You don't fully agree with Howard, because he doesn't even fully agree with himself. He constantly contradicts himself, in interviews AND in his awful book. Terrence Howard knows nothing of math & science, and he proves THAT fact with every new word salad that comes out of his mouth
@lorenalberico79623 күн бұрын
Bro! This conversation was legit!!!!!! Loved it. Thank you all for your minds and your words. ❤
@matthewhoch785222 күн бұрын
I agree!
@OneMindHistory3 ай бұрын
Ahahahah Terrence eventually standing in a casual kitchen explaining his stuff is just too good
@brotherloveakarhythmicsola29437 күн бұрын
Anything impacting upon something else is going to create sound, he is making a simple thing very hard, and light is sound speeded up
@brotherloveakarhythmicsola29437 күн бұрын
Vibe is sound
@Goldzen_tv2 ай бұрын
So as I understand it Terrance is basically trying to explain the fundamental laws that govern a scalable vector space. If this reality that we inhabit is really an advanced simulation or vector space then he has discovered how it is assembled. I wish I was a computer science engineer who can utilise this concept into new system architecture and code architecture to which he referenced in the JRE episode where electronics would be more efficient if designed in motion instead of straight lines to generate less heat and resistance. Super interesting stuff this idea/concept does have wide ranging applications that have yet to be further explored and applied into our perceivable reality. Amazing time we live in that is for sure and i'm with him 100% that there will be a divide or breakaway civilisation that uses this technology and the people who are complacent and still defending the matrix will be left behind. Let's just hope we all survive long enough for this technology to fester instead of being swept under the rug like many times before in history.
@raycar11652 ай бұрын
I’ll take a ticket on that train outta here.
@save_from_comments16 күн бұрын
Look into Ashton Forbes
@Fireash201612 күн бұрын
So it seems like there is a system in place that would rather keep us limited in our understanding of the universe. For example who decided that we couldnt pursue new ideas in science and the understanding of the universe
@raycar116511 күн бұрын
@@Fireash2016 @Fireash2016 The truth, after world war two with two and a half billion idiots on the planet, was too dangerous to release to the public. Now in Dec. 2024 with eight point two billion idiots, a couple of those idiots have put the puzzle together for everyone to see. "they actually said flat out to us don't start don't do AI startups like don't don't fund AI startups it's not something that we're going to allow to happen um they're they're not going to be allowed to exist uh there's no point um they basically said AI is going to be a a game of two or three big companies um working closely with the government um and we're going to basically wrap them in a you know they I'm paraphrasing but we're going to basically wrap them in a government cocoon uh we're going to protect them from competition um we're going to control them um and we're going to dictate what they do um and then I said well I said I don't understand how you're going to lock this down so much because like the math for you know AI is like out there and it's being taught everywhere and you know they literally said well you know during the Cold War we we classified entire areas of physics um and took them out of the research chch community and and and and and like entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed um and that if we if we decide we need to we're going to do the same thing to to ma to the math underneath AI " -Marc Andreessen interview on The Free Press Marc Andreessen on AI, Tech, Censorship and Dining With Trump
@raycar116511 күн бұрын
@@Fireash2016 Full Interview: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZi3lo2OrJKsqrMsi=JGF7VLRYHNGN3fKT Short:kzbin.inforulGP9cqS4w?si=mbY-UJ74n2cNuCYp
@ArionRace25 күн бұрын
I think Terrance has the system bent over,I pray he gets to stick it in & wiggle it around for all of us. Stay safe Terrance🙏❤️.
@royalblack939 күн бұрын
not even half way through the podcast and im already seeing its amazing, thankyou Demystifysci ! i subscribed real quick lol
@RayUp3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the opportunity & love really…sending more right back…🫶 Keep it going!… #strongertogether💯 #terrencehoward is a genius IRT
@lekobatechnology2613Күн бұрын
This is one of the best podcasts, and I am astonished that its viewership hasn't reached the millions yet!!
@DemystifySci_PodcastКүн бұрын
Thanks. It ain’t a fair playing field but we r never gonna stop
@shinonyx7 күн бұрын
Fantastic conversation, subbed
@bryan41813 ай бұрын
What Terrence is doing is commendable in so far as allowing those inclined to think about alternatives the freedom and desire to do so. Assumptions seem to abound in science today and the recognition that some knowledge may be beyond us the way we are going is desperately needed. Eric Weinstein wanted Terrence to focus on this, and give Howard the opportunity to shine with his alternative thinking. I think Howard knows that reality will always outrun apprehension, and that is the stick and carrot. We need a new donkey. The question I ask is if I was going to build a simulation how would I design it so that the simulated would never prove they are in a simulation? The universe isn't fine tuned for life, life is fine tuned for a simulated universe..
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
That was always allowed... (That = freedom to believe untested and/or false nonsense)
@seanharbinger3 ай бұрын
Yeah but he’s wrong. Declaratively. 😂😂😂
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
exactly the opposite is true, he takes well developed ideas, conflates them out of context and destroys the past .. pythagoras theorem derives from radii and circles, starts with length (r = 1, quantity) of a line segment or distance between points .. go from there, area shows up pretty quick. without maths at all, pure form and logic.
@janedrew30503 ай бұрын
"It is quite comfortable to me to find that experiment need not quail before mathematics but is quite competent to rival it in discovery" -Michael Faraday
@OchiiDinUmbraa3 ай бұрын
Someone show Terrence that for every number between 0 and 1, if you square it, you get a smaller number. He is going to lose his mind.
@Adambombgallerie3 ай бұрын
Thats soo hilarious, I just did that exact thing. Multiply anything smaller than one by itself and it shrinks. I’ve never done that before and thought, “someone had to have said something about it?!” Here you are! After experiencing the diminishing returns from my “multiplication” I immediately realized, “clearly I don’t understand something about math.” Of course I don’t, I went to art school.
@OchiiDinUmbraa3 ай бұрын
@@Adambombgallerie on a calculator every number between 0 and 1 can be expressed as a fraction: a/b where a is smaller than b. So when you square this fraction, you get (a*a)/(b*b). And because b is bigger than a, when you square b you get a bigger return than when you square a. And thus, the result is smaller.
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
except number is a verb, to count, resulting in a quantity .. zero is a placekeeper for scale, that O in geometry denotes "point of Origin", 0 means nothing, nada, without quantity, therefore zero is a numeral only, NaN, not a number, (see infinity for the other bookend of mathemagical madness) .. meanwhile, phi .. 1 + phi = phi * phi; 1+sqrt(5) / 2; the speed of light may be c but then the velocity of light becomes pi/2 * c , vector is 2d and rate is 1d, length of path vs. distance between endpoints, assuming that sinusoidal wave model.
@rh0msfer443Ай бұрын
Someone show Terrance how to count from 1 to 10, it will blow his mind, he's that f**king stupid and so are everyone who thinks he's a genius. He can't articulate what he's saying in a coherent manner because he's stupid, then we have idiots trying to interpret what he's saying, it's hilarious. He doesn't say anything, word salads, like listening to Kamala Harris on politics. If he was right about anything he could express his theories in math and would be peer reviewed, but he's not, he's simply a narcissist with a real god complex.
@Anyon-z2sАй бұрын
@@williiayummjayagreed like Terrance said a ¾ structure is the crux of energy and matter I show this with x=c(a+b) in 3 folds and the forth being an emergence beyond base 10 if you're interested comment back and I'll email you my paper
@jasonbennett23492 ай бұрын
I have so much love for this conversation. Greatful for the questions and thoughts and answers. Thank you for your show.
@gianni_schicchi3 ай бұрын
1:35:00 The calculator is using floating points which will have rounding errors for irrational numbers.
@lightboyxxx2333 ай бұрын
The iPhone's calculator is generally good at working with floating point numbers, as it rounds to a fixed number of significant digits. This is the correct thing to do with floating point numbers. - google
@OMOninja9 күн бұрын
The error is embedded in the fundamental axiomatic error surrounding associative and commutative actions, most interesting of that error is the conundrum of SQUARE ROOT OF 2
@leeturton62333 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing this one guys , really good listen .
@vibehighest3 ай бұрын
btw, i have your back T✌🤝
@mattpiper52783 ай бұрын
The basis of almost all of Terrence Howard’s foundational ideas are from a book called. The Kybalion. Kind of surprising to me that no one‘s really mentioned as far as I can see it.
@WizardSkyth3 ай бұрын
Indeed he's constantly parroting others often trying to pass them as his own, and when he doesn't and presents his own ideas it's utter nonsense.
@loopsky3 ай бұрын
I guess it's time to slowly realize we're living in the simulation with very limited free will. Enjoy the ride but don't get too attached. Most likely it's not your first rodeo.
@OneRudeBoy3 ай бұрын
@@loopsky I agree. But I think life should be enjoyable. It seems those in power are incapable of knowing how to throw a good time on Simulation Earth. Why?
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
Not familiar with THAT book, but I have read (and "peer reviewed", mostly for the entertainment of others) Mr. Howard's book... It's hot garbage.
@gassybruli3 ай бұрын
That book is summing up the hermetic knowledge, it is not invented by Atkinson who wrote a book. Hermetic knowledge holds so many layers which we do not understand yet.
@jasonbennett23492 ай бұрын
I want to be part of that breakaway civilization. Sign me up!
@HoseaHerb8 күн бұрын
The way the light is reflecting on the geometry of those shapes is crazy!
@salcorbit63303 ай бұрын
One of my favorite episodes so far. Even at three hours, I wish it had been longer. It would be great to have Terrence on again. Creative people have a capacity to reveal and understand some things about the world that non-creative people, hard as they may try, simply cannot. Would love to see more like this in the future. Thank you DSP!
@daarom34723 ай бұрын
they have an ability to form creative ideas. The danger about creativity is that (outside of art) it's usually wrong or misses significant parts. The standard model has been tested millions of times and explains a wide range of phenomena. It only fails at extremely small or large scales. A new theory should at least account for what the standard model accounts for then add extra understanding.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
This episode was a train wreck -- or maybe a better metaphor is.... A trip to a DMV designed by Escher
@mariogonzales97523 ай бұрын
I love all of you and I truly love brother Terrence, please keep on doing what you doing
@RayUp3 ай бұрын
@@mariogonzales9752 you just got a 👍+1…let grow this thing…🫶#tlc
@brian71363 ай бұрын
What a great conversation! Thank you!
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
What did you take away from this interview?
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 Various clips worth making more commentary videos over
@brian71363 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 I am digesting, Terrance's mind is at a different level and I think he may be special? I will wait and see. I am a simple person, but i am trying to understand the universe we live in. I think they were respectful of each other.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
@@brian7136 they were respectful in the sense that they didn't explicitly insult one another. Unfortunately, that was one of the only positive aspects of the interview, I thought. Both Terrance and the interviewers proved they misunderstood child level mathematics (which, to be fair, most children don't understand on a fundamental level, since they merely memorized it by rote learning). In addition, the interviewers failed to solicit a single testable prediction from Howard, even though he made multiple claims about having testable predictions (that he never specified). I could go on but...
@K.greenbanks3 күн бұрын
This was a very interesting and informative talk. Thank you Guys all three of you are amazing together as well as individuals This was inspiring
@SupCortez3 ай бұрын
You both are fantastic hosts, fantastic questions and kudos to you for trying to help bridge new ideas with current understanding of such complex topics. Liked and brand new lifetime subscriber here. Going off to binge your other videos after this. Cheers
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
@@SupCortez this was a trainwreck. The hosts kept trying to push Terrance to say things that the hosts believed, things that Terrence didn't believe or didn't find important; nothing was elucidated; no details of his model were clarified beyond what he said preciously; none of his nonsense was challenged (some of it was endorsed!)
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 You can tell when the hosts are visibly uncomfortable with what Terrence is saying / how Terrence is acting. The second-hand embarrassment is palpable.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 I was just listening so I didn't see facial expressions, gestures, etc.; I did hear them actively agreeing with nonsense
@FirstNameLastName-tm4tg3 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024his model was explained quite clearly in the time they had. Aether as the universal substance and atoms/matter as disturbances in this substance is good enough for me tho it obviously goes much deeper in the convo. He was challenged on math by Anastasia for like half an hour, r u sure u heard the thing?
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
@@FirstNameLastName-tm4tg anastasia's challenge included her surprise that 2*1.41 wasn't equal to 1.41*1.41 -- so, forgive me if I don't consider her attempt an adequate challenge
@magir002Ай бұрын
Thanks for striking the eloquent balance between oversimplification and scientific tangent deep dive, I was able to follow 😅 This is such a treasure! Good luck ratifying this into the Bible and other books for the future
@squeakytoyrecords17023 ай бұрын
@The DemystifySci Podcast First and foremost, thank you for having Terrence on your show and the willingness to learn. For this you have got a new subscriber. @2:21:00 You discussed the frequency of Hydrogen. The frequency of any object is its resonant frequency. To find the resonant frequency, you bombard the target with sound while monitoring the frequency response of the target. The peak with the highest amplitude is the fundamental frequency as it is constructive coupling and interfering with the material. Regarding sound, things that can be heard within the human hearing spectrum are generally classified as sound. However, every frequency in the electromagnetic spectrum is both sound and light. In regards to creating hydrogen from sound. Yes, sound is the correct signal source. Furthermore, the sound will need to be a specific geometry and point source. A geometrically structured coherent phaser beam would do the trick. Let me know if you need to borrow one;).
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
except for the pesky sound of one hand clapping, in vacuum .. that is .. fundamental mistake to make electricity and light synonymous, and Walter Russel did that but none of these people have done the work on the Russel ideas, let alone his geometric mapping of sets .. which have all been superceded by more useful maps, rightly so. Edwin Kaal has been on and Unzicker too .. ya really think Unzicker would stand for this ? == he publicly callled out the King of String as a fraud and charlattan .. to his face! courage is more important than consensus, in science
@RayUp3 ай бұрын
@@squeakytoyrecords1702 agreed & you as well…love how this thing is growing!…🫶#tlc
@bobann3566Ай бұрын
Tesla said light is a sound wave of the aether.
@squeakytoyrecords1702Ай бұрын
@@bobann3566 Absolutely!
@nathan_sweet6 күн бұрын
Key Fallacies and Flaws: 1. Appeal to Novelty (Shiny New Model Fallacy): Core Issue: The speaker argues that existing models of physics are flawed because they are "old," "broken," or "dogmatic," and claims their new model is inherently superior. Fallacy: Just because something is new or reframes ideas differently doesn’t mean it is correct or even coherent. Novelty does not equate to truth. Reflection: Revolutionary ideas in physics (e.g., relativity, quantum mechanics) have historically succeeded because they were rigorously validated, not merely because they replaced older systems. 2. False Dichotomy (Either/Or Thinking): Core Issue: Phrases like "existing math is useless, so we must replace it with this new system" ignore the spectrum of possibilities. Many systems coexist because they apply in different contexts (e.g., classical mechanics vs. quantum mechanics). Fallacy: Framing existing systems as "completely invalid" without room for coexistence or refinement of their utility misrepresents scientific methodologies. Reflection: The practical success of current systems in technology (e.g., GPS, semiconductors, energy systems) suggests they are useful approximations of physical laws. Replacing them wholesale isn’t the only path forward. 3. Ad Hominem and Appeal to Authority: Core Issue: Criticism of mainstream science often devolves into personal attacks on figures like Einstein or vague accusations of institutional dogma, while the speaker simultaneously elevates themselves as a singular authority with phrases like "there are no peers to my work." Fallacy: Attacking the credibility of others or self-aggrandizing doesn’t substitute for rigorous proof. Reflection: Science thrives on falsifiability and peer engagement. The lack of peer-reviewed validation or structured mathematical rigor here is a glaring weakness. 4. Conflation of Terminologies: Core Issue: Terms like "supersymmetry," "tetron," "electricity," "magnetism," "spin," and "pressure" are used in ways that deviate wildly from established definitions. This creates confusion and alienates the audience. Fallacy: Redefining widely understood terms without clarity or justification undermines communication. This is not inherently wrong in science, but without precise definitions or a consistent framework, it becomes problematic. Reflection: Language matters in science; precision ensures ideas can be universally evaluated. Inventing terms without defining them rigorously adds unnecessary opacity. 5. Strawman Misrepresentation of Physics: Core Issue: The speaker frequently misrepresents concepts like "spin," "straight lines in physics," and "irrational numbers," dismissing them as inherently flawed without engaging with their nuanced mathematical and physical bases. Fallacy: Arguing against an oversimplified or incorrect version of established science doesn't invalidate the real, more sophisticated concepts. Reflection: Concepts like the Pythagorean theorem, platonic solids, and "straight lines" are approximations or idealizations within specific contexts. Misinterpreting or ignoring their utility creates a strawman. 6. Category Errors: Core Issue: Mixing metaphysical, geometric, and physical principles without clarifying their relationships leads to muddled arguments. For example, "curved space eliminates straight lines, so platonic solids are invalid." Fallacy: Physics and geometry have different domains of application. Physical "straight lines" can exist locally within curved spacetime, and the utility of Platonic solids in modeling remains context-dependent. Reflection: The failure to distinguish between metaphors, models, and empirical realities conflates abstraction with physicality. 7. Lack of Empirical Validation: Core Issue: Grand claims about the "superiority" of the model, like explaining "noble gas behavior" or "redefining geometry for space travel," are not substantiated with experimental data or peer-reviewed proof. Fallacy: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Without empirical backing, the argument becomes speculative philosophy masquerading as physics. Reflection: There is nothing inherently wrong with speculative models, but conflating speculation with proven science is misleading. 8. Overreliance on Anecdotal and Personal Belief: Core Issue: Statements like "I just know this is the truth" or "this was given to me in another time" undermine the argument’s scientific credibility. Fallacy: Appeals to personal experience or intuition are not substitutes for reproducible results or logical rigor. Reflection: Science relies on objective frameworks that others can independently verify. Subjective experiences, while meaningful, do not establish truth universally. 9. Equivocation and Semantic Overloading: Core Issue: Terms like "pressure," "expansion," "feminine," and "masculine" are used in inconsistent ways that combine physical, metaphysical, and metaphorical meanings without clear demarcation. Fallacy: Equivocation occurs when a term’s meaning shifts mid-argument, making reasoning incoherent. Reflection: While metaphors can inspire ideas, they must ultimately be grounded in precise, measurable terms for scientific validity. 10. Circular Reasoning: Core Issue: Claims like "this model works because it is correct, and it is correct because it works" rely on self-referential reasoning rather than external validation. Fallacy: Circular reasoning assumes the conclusion within the premise, making it logically invalid. Reflection: Without testable predictions or falsifiability, the argument remains trapped in an isolated feedback loop. Final Thoughts: This exploration is fascinating in its ambition and creativity, but it suffers from a lack of rigorous methodology, precision, and empirical validation. The model might inspire innovative thinking, but it risks being dismissed entirely due to its fallacies and contradictions. To move forward: Define terms precisely and consistently within a clear framework. Acknowledge gaps in the model and work to address them transparently. Engage with peers (even skeptics) to refine and test claims rigorously. Generate testable predictions that distinguish this model from existing theories. Distill the core idea-focus on clarity rather than complexity for its own sake. The path to paradigm-shifting science is through coherence, transparency, and empirical rigor-not just passion or rhetoric.
@jaydenwilson95223 күн бұрын
Patchwork is meaningless when the foundations themselves are the problem. Also.... you might want to crosscheck what your bot says before you copy and paste... Like 3, whose authority did he appeal to?
@ChuckUAsshole2 ай бұрын
Excellent conversation 💯
@weaverlance3 ай бұрын
oh man! next level stuff guys! congrats!
@mariogonzales97523 ай бұрын
I'm really really enjoying this conversation, thank you
@flamealligator69843 ай бұрын
Gratitude for your loving respectful and insightful discussion with Terrence. 💙💙💙 Hope springs eternal in this episode. @Terrence: Keep it up! Love and support for you. 💫💙
@akaROOSTA3 ай бұрын
Thank you for giving Terrence a chance to Free flow his ideas and what he’s actually proposing. This is a wonderful episode ❤
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
Did he share a single testable prediction, a single beneficial invention, or a single evidence-based novel idea?
@RayUp3 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 he shared enough now it time to work…🫶#tlc I’m here for it!…#strongertogether💯
@akaROOSTA2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 the calculator goddamnit!!
@akaROOSTA2 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 go through the patents and bring back worthy mentions please and thank you
@The.Watcher.20242 ай бұрын
@@akaROOSTA you're joking, right?
@KeyJsu3 күн бұрын
Keep teaching Terrence.
@Gebwalter3 ай бұрын
I missed the Mitch Hedberg quote the 1st watch through, hilarious injection!!!
@adriennejubilee45503 ай бұрын
Forgive me if someone has already commented on this. I was wondering if Shilo was referring to Le Sage's wave theory of push gravity 1:43:20. I think its focus is on opposing gravitational forces influencing the movement of physical objects, and Terrence Howard's theory focuses on how opposing electromagnetic waves create matter. I also think that Tom Van Flandern proposed how light density and the ability of some corpuscles that are responsible for creating gravity in Le Sage’s theory could solve the thermodynamic problems associated with it.
@adamf.98353 ай бұрын
Great job!👍
@colton_9362 ай бұрын
Exploring new ideas is always genius. Keep it up Terrence.
@RogueElement.2 ай бұрын
Terrence truly has a world view 200 years ahead of most people. His thought process is more in line with cutting edge dr.Michael Levins.
@rubstroll1Ай бұрын
Not 200, 210 most likely 😮
@teokennedy97853 ай бұрын
Thank you for different perspectives!
@truthseeker48413 ай бұрын
Someone give this man a Nobel Prize!
@weirdwolly4093 ай бұрын
for Stupidity? I don't think that's a valid category "truthseeker". Someone who can't figure out how many apples are in one box containing one apple shouldn't be taken seriously.
@SadieTrismagestis0712Ай бұрын
I LOVE seeing T's growth in his expression of his ideas...beautiful words🥰 im here for it!!!
@triviamp41493 ай бұрын
I really like the display & demonstration
@triviamp41493 ай бұрын
Yes please keep teaching & sharing this it's helping me & it's interesting
@kevinlemke94972 ай бұрын
You’re brilliant Terrence! You’re shaping our future! I will teach this to my 4 children once I fully understand it. I love and support everything you’re doing 🫶🏼 Sincerely a common man awakened from the societal crisis 😢
@chillywilly541Ай бұрын
Please do not go near your children with this bullshit.
@DiAngeloTheSecondАй бұрын
That would be child abuse
@kevinlemke9497Ай бұрын
@ You’re irrelevant… have fun living in a lie your entire existence
@LovesoundsForever3 ай бұрын
I love you Terrence Howard! thank you guys for this podcast
@LovesoundsForever3 ай бұрын
Next conversation how to include more of the capacity of our society capability to understand because of the poison in our diet.
@jausspacascuse29782 ай бұрын
Great conversation! I've been fascinated with Terrence and his interpretation of everything since hearing all of the backlash from cultured scientists that can't break their information foundation. I personally believe this "revelation" has come forth through him at the perfect time. He talks hypothetically teaching his physics the right way if the world was wiped out but in actuality, it is about to be. We are at the dawn of an A.I. revolution and if an A.I. were to be trained in this perspective it could revolutionize the future
@saschamarr495Ай бұрын
Terrence is absolutely wrong about everything he says and does not understand basic mathematics ..nor has he ever gone to college and studied anything. The problem is that none of you people are scientifically literate.. you hear a buzzword and think "ah yes he must know what he is talking about" He is good at memorizing things, but has 0 understanding of the concepts. He does not even know what the decimal system in arithmetic is called!!! He calls it "the dewey decimal system"...which is a system of classifying books at the library! It is infuriating how mindless you folks are ...
@adriennejubilee45503 ай бұрын
Thank you for this platform that allows people outside the scientific mainstream to share their ideas.
@jamescarver58763 ай бұрын
Sure keep sharing your baseless ideas. 😂
@adriennejubilee45503 ай бұрын
@@jamescarver5876Are you a frequent viewer of this podcast?
@johnlard23 күн бұрын
The confusion about multiplication regarding area can be solved by using units of measurement in mind. We say 1×1=1 and that seems weird when imagining how 1 is both the length and the area. But usually you'd say 1cm×1cm=1cm². Now we see the difference, as 1cm (the length of any side of the square) is not the same as 1cm² (the area of the square). In the same way, 3in×4in=12in². In this case, we have a rectangle with an area of 12in², not 12in.
@mikxyas3 ай бұрын
Thank you for reminding me that the universe is beautiful ❤️
@rmschindler1443 ай бұрын
thank you for making this comment ♥
@Tyler-xe6zj3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your hard work. New here and excited for more podcasts. 😬❤️
@anthonybailey18063 ай бұрын
“The disagreement between Mr. Howard and Mr. Tyson highlights the importance of both observation and critical thinking in scientific inquiry. Mr. Howard’s focus on observation emphasizes the empirical evidence as the foundation for understanding the world, while Mr. Tyson’s criticism of those who didn’t look with their own eyes underscores the need for skepticism and critical evaluation. However, a crucial question that arises from this conversation is whether we are asking the right questions from our observations. Are we framing our inquiries in a way that allows us to uncover new insights or are we constrained by our existing assumptions and paradigms? By considering this question, we can foster a more open-minded and innovative approach to scientific exploration.”
@piscator_M1-173 ай бұрын
Bro Tyson is no scientist. Howard on the other hand is.
@weirdwolly4093 ай бұрын
@@piscator_M1-17 Ooooof how can someone be so incredibly wrong and be so confident about it...
@piscator_M1-173 ай бұрын
@weirdwolly409 10 papers vs 100 patents who's the better scientist again?
@weirdwolly4093 ай бұрын
@@piscator_M1-17 "Tyson is no scientist" you just said he wasn't a scientist at all... now you are asking who is a better scientist?? Hmmm. Tyson is the better scientist btw since he has done actual science. And he (unlike Howard) knows how many apples there are in one box which contains one apple.
@piscator_M1-173 ай бұрын
@weirdwolly409 No, he has taken other people's observations and commented on them. 10 times I give him a few good ones, and he is a hell of a speaker, but he hasn't created a new way of flight or a new way of shooting a gun or a Artificial digital environment like Terrence has. Just saying.
@PCG20223 ай бұрын
I would love to see Terrence and Malcolm bendall together in a room. When he speaks of curvature, I hear Malcolm say the same thing and describe the Zero and 12 on a clock as the same but can't be. Malcolm has found the zero point in plasmoids so putting these 2 together would be amazing. Loving the video so far, I'm an hour and 42 minutes in, Great work. PCG
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
Bendall? Carlson? .. neither one studied Bernouilli, let alone Alven or Langmuir ..
@PCG20223 ай бұрын
@williiayummjay Malcolm Bendall? Not Carlson? But either way, so what? The thunderstorm generator works regardless of your snide comment. (Verified). 🖕
@dallylang3 ай бұрын
I enjoyed this podcast. The best picture, for me, is a 360 degrees of point of views. The best picture of things include every angles. Interesting discussion.
@Anyon-z2sАй бұрын
Except quantum mechanical structures and molecules have a wider angle of incidence relative to a full rotation of 1080°
@fhgservices1111Күн бұрын
I’m glad I came across your channel I’ve been interested since I heard this interview at a college I believe
@AssuredServices3 ай бұрын
Definitely on to something. Everything is connected.🎯
@goldwhitedragonАй бұрын
The Buddhists have been saying this for 2,000 years. So...
@nr70000000013 ай бұрын
Hello Anastasia, you talked about how you wanted to find the fundamental root frequency of the hydrogen spectral lines, and carbon, nitrogen. You also talked about magnetism and electricity being related in some sort of geometry. That triggered me, because there was a researcher called Gabriel laFreniere who could show this in a very visible manner (without using quaternions or Dirac equations or some sort) that it might be just a visble wave phenomenom, due to a lens effect - he is in the same wave-mechanical camp as Jeff Yee and dr. Milo Wolff.
@jamescastro20373 ай бұрын
Probably one of the best interactions that would be expected for the furthering of human knowing the human. Great job. The artificial intelligence in the comments don't like a change in the program. Bits b glitchin.
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
Terrence Howard is glitching
@jamescastro20373 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 after reading your comments it seems like the only way you get information is from reading. Aka Data. And the only thing you are applying to Terrance is Data. If you struggle reading the world and think you know it by reading a book then, you are artificially intelligent.
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@jamescastro2037 Yes I do read a lot but I get information from a variety of sources and mediums, including talking with hundreds of people every day. Can you name even one thing from this podcast that you learned, or one thing that was worth listening to? (from Terrence)
@christopheryoungbeck88373 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 Troll
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 work at a call centre do you? p.s. the media is the message, mediums conjure up ghosts.
@zwanex3 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤, wow you guys have been best hosts to Mr Howard.
@giothahero3 ай бұрын
Terrence please don’t stop sharing this. It’s extremely important
@supermike21643 ай бұрын
KEY POINTS FOR ME: The concept of 1 needs to REALLY represent substantial reality #2 I understand the concept of ether #3 the language of multiply magnetism radiation and electrical. I was confused about the color tones and how sound corresponds with the elements.
@RayUp3 ай бұрын
@@supermike2164 you will get there…push thru…#tlc
@cperterpan68603 ай бұрын
We can't advance because we refuse to be corrected. Instead, we react like children to correction.
@Tevelle-z3vКүн бұрын
Well said
@triviamp41493 ай бұрын
As Im looking & understanding this I feel this is why I didnt get math or physics or biology becauseI didnt have goo teaching but just watching this have helped me sooooooo much now I have a better understanding
@RONIN-112Ай бұрын
I bet you do
@davidhenry794623 күн бұрын
None of this is factual. 😂
@daycrow86513 ай бұрын
The fact yall as academics welcomed howard instead of “ putting him in his place “ solidified this as my absolute favorite scifi podcast. i really do love yall. We really do not see many , if any , self taught black people in science so this really means a lot. What terrance was attempting to speak about on rogan lines up with Immanuel Velikovsky though i’m not sure he is aware of this
@daarom34723 ай бұрын
wtf does this have to do with him being black? He's just not read enough to truly know what he's talking about. Followed this podcast for a long time but this is an unsub for me.
@salcorbit63303 ай бұрын
Good thing we have the disinformation police to set us straight. Without enlightened authoritarians shutting down conversations we will never improve our understanding.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
This interview was a trainwreck of grandiose delusion and stupidity
@ichigokurosaki28383 ай бұрын
@daarom3472 the person just said he doesn't see much black ppl self taught in the field of science. I don't think he was going for anything beyond that. But let's be real, we live in the real world and blacks have been treated differently in many fields but he wasn't diverting the convo to that.
@daarom34723 ай бұрын
@@ichigokurosaki2838 there arent any self taught people in the field of hard science full stop. It's simply too hard to properly learn it yourself from scratch (perhaps a dozen or do exceptions). So obviously if there aren't any, there also aren't going to be black people either. The OP is insinuating that the treatment of this actor has something to do with his skin, it does not.
@wadeodonoghue18873 ай бұрын
There are levels of understanding to things like Money: Level 1 : I use it to get what I want. Level 2: everyone uses it get what they want. Level 3: it's social lubrication to get people to give each other what they want. Level 4: It keeps record of past and future wants, indefinitely, Money doesn't rot but all life does. Etc... Most people don't seek deeper understanding, you don't need to understand Money to use it. I feel Terrence is speaking on a higher Scientific level, I don't agree that the lower levels are now "useless" however I am also open to deeper levels of understanding.
@supermike21643 ай бұрын
THIS CONVERSATION IS AWESOME ❤❤❤!!!!
@chriss4432Ай бұрын
Its a joke - He's clueless - stop feeding him your energy
@michaelheil-ij5ji3 ай бұрын
Loved this discussion So very insightful and helpful If we could get beyond the concept that structure/ organization implies stuff, and not configurational movement, aka vortices of interacting motion, we could make real progress in understanding the universe. Shilo, with his tangible metaphorical actors, ie atoms, fibers, particles(Oh but I hate the word particle!), kept pulling Terrance back to paleo physics, disallowing a deeper conversation to develop. But….I appreciate so much you both bringing this to us, making us think. You guys are a gift. And thanks for the slight jog back to physics. Much more fun than the metaphysical/ spiritual/mystical direction the project is drifting toward. Don’t give up the fight by falling prey to carriers of these, at base, unsupportable and lazily conceived notions. Hang tough.
@Grouiiiiik2 ай бұрын
I finally took the time to listen to the whole thing and it was better than I anticipated. In my opinion his fundamental model has some merit and it actually integrates very simply and beautifully with the electromagnetic forces. Also, he made predictions about a noble gas that should exist with the configuration : finding it would really add a ton of credibility to the model. Lastly he said something like everything over time loses energy and thus structurally changes, including light. It's very interesting and could be something to test.
@raycar11652 ай бұрын
Are you familiar with the electric universe model? Worth looking into, if you haven’t already. It’s most ardent proponent The Thunderbolts Project is featured first on my channel.
@Crow-p3yАй бұрын
the passion in this episode and conversation excites me so much for the future .. gained a new fan 💯
@StrongBlaze1012 ай бұрын
Thank you for letting him do the visual presentation. This is the first time i seen it done. As a person who was on the fence about him, im definitely a believer now. I would love to hear other scientists review his presentation.
@raycar11652 ай бұрын
I’m so far behind … I didn’t even realize this or the formscapes interviews were up. Much ❤ Love 🌏🌎🌍☯️⚡️ Terra 🌞 Pax
@TheWillmo653 ай бұрын
It won't take a thousand years, Shilo.. You have already had many guests on your podcast who are moving in the direction Mr Howard and his predecessorr, Dr Russell. / The male/female description in the lynchpin talk is very "I Ching" / This is a good discussion. Thanks to both of you and Mr Howard.
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
except the very notion of "the academy" instead of academia, the notion that teams invent things .. when solitary (many un-married, have time) tinkerers have done ALL of that part .. never Faraday et al, never Franklin, et al .. Shilo promotes anti-science by these, obviously progressive woke bs reset narratives, as if .. meanwhile Da Vinci taught more physics than Newton ever stole and made look like his own. Howard claims utter nonsense, often. Ninety Patents, if you include Trademarks and Copyrights == zero patents; trademarks for logos, product and brand names; copyrights on scripts, manuscripts, website content, and so on .. apparently nobody told him about the monetization of Industrial Designs .. (why your tail-light lens "costs" 245.45 +tx in USD) .. toys and trinkets, no products since 14 years is a clue
@jamest1682 ай бұрын
Loved the discussion. Have to listen again with full attention. But I think Terrence is on to something.
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
BTW I think having Don hoffman, Terrence and Ibrahim Karim discuss their geometric theories of Time-space and beyond , would reveal a lot because as far as I remember Ibrahim Karim explained how a vortex is somehow a fundamental shape in biogeometry.
@Jamesrwatsonx3 ай бұрын
Don Hoffman is delusional. Half of his views are rather delusional I mean.
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
making up new words for something ancient, to make it "sciency" is a tell, is a sign, is werdzalad .. meanwhile vortex or torus ? he doesn't specify, only muddify and mystify or sumply doesn't know, and you don't know because he never says .. but these things can be known ...
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
@@williiayummjay regarding “torus or vortex?”, doesn’t really matter. Check out toroidal vortices or vortex rings and their instabilities.
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
@@Jamesrwatsonx find more advanced devaluation techniques, gaslighting is too basic for us. Always consider the audience.
@Jamesrwatsonx3 ай бұрын
@ShH-3119 Haha, sure. I wouldn't bother. The majority of you smart guys don't have as much gas as you'd like to think. Besides, if I tilted your perspective just a teeny bit, It'd change your whole outlook on his whole 'headset' thesis, trust me.
@gabemasson3 ай бұрын
That was fucking great. You guys. Seriously. Thank you so much for this show!
@MarkoTManninen3 ай бұрын
Wow. Terrence Howard here and Weinsteinses at the channel of Prof. Dave. Will be a long night to replay both few times.
@curiousfella40763 ай бұрын
That title though re Prof Dave what in the world. Hope it's not just telescoping and guilt by association. edit: From an AI summary: "Bret Weinstein's controversial claims regarding medical science, specifically his belief that all drug testing is invalid due to lab mice having longer telomeres than wild mice. The video points out that this idea is irrelevant since drugs undergo clinical trials on human subjects before reaching the market. " Not off to a good start. Bret's argument is that regeneration is enhanced and cancer fighting is diminished in those rats. Not actually about telomeres. And so are drugs tested for their long term effects in terms of elevating cell damage and e.g. heart damage risk with that? I have my doubts. Anyway cheers.
@DemystifySci_Podcast3 ай бұрын
I'm afraid the day is coming when we too will face the Himmler of sci-tube
@MarkoTManninen3 ай бұрын
@@DemystifySci_Podcast Well, props for your courage and keeping open discussion going on.
@DemystifySci_Podcast3 ай бұрын
@@MarkoTManninen who was it that said 'no publicity is bad publicity?' I say bring it
@sadface74573 ай бұрын
@MarkoTManninen "Prof" dav has a very superficial understanding of science.
@CATOSHISYNDICATАй бұрын
I like the way you talk with your eyes closed. I have to do that as well in order to remain concise and focused
@KaliFissure3 ай бұрын
Space is a dielectric super fluid. Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. Compactification creates limits. A maxima , event horizon, and a minima, Lambda. This gradient is gravity. Because geometric flows are real. Compactification also forces conservation because it's a closed system. Closed in time. Limit theorem also dictates that the closure is at the limits. The limits connect. In at event horizon Out in deep void. This is the flow of the universe. Each neutron which contacts an event horizon Takes EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space The free neutron decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup, Dark matter. The decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of amorphous hydrogen gas is a volume increase of around 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy. In time this amorphous hydrogen stabilizes and coalesces and falls towards an event horizon. Loop. Neutron decay cosmology. 🖖
@hollaadieewaldfeee3 ай бұрын
Space comes from spacings. Concept only. Not fluid. Time = tacts/ spacings. Concept. Planck created "quantity", Einstein did not understand concepts: he turned concept qunatum, quantity, into things: quanta. Nonsens;-)
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
space is a shadow. it does not exist. space is a woowoo. :D
@nuestra_victoria3 ай бұрын
I think you’re on to something. Spacetime is the force free gravitational potential field of the universe. Its the background gravitational humm that permeates all of existence. Spacetimes origin comes from mass. This makes sense because mass is space and it affects time. Spacetime has no meaning without mass. Spacetime existing independent of mass can only occur in books.
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
@@nuestra_victoria fields are illusion, mathematical bshttery. space is a shadow. space is illusionary. it does not exists. waves do not exists. they are a shaddow representations of a process
@rubstroll1Ай бұрын
Jee , I won’t need the first course, I am full up with the 🥗 salad!…
@matthewhoch785222 күн бұрын
I met Terrance Howard and now we have become close friends. He frequently Flys his drones to my house sorry about all the new jersey issues
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
1:24:56 This entire calculator demonstration is merely a parlor trick. Terrence does not understand how floating-point arithmetic works in computation. The precision of the calculation depends on the number of bits allocated by the operating system or programming language to represent the base, the mantissa, and the exponent parts of floating-point representations of real number values in digital computational systems - simply put, calculators will ALWAYS have round-off error, due to the nature of floating-point representations, regardless of how many bits are allocated. Hence, why he is so mystified by how calculators do math. Every time he pulls his phone out to perform these parlor tricks, he is relying on the calculator's approximations and levels of precision with regard to floating-point values... more generally, he lacks an understanding of how we represent quantity using decimal digits, which are converted from binary digits (bits) in the calculator's operating system. Source:: I have a degree in Mathematics, a minor in Computer Science, and I have been a teacher of both mathematics and computer science for over a decade. I routinely cover topics like this (floating-point arithmetic and binary/decimal representations of quantity) with 15-16 year olds in my Introductory Computer Science course. Terrence Howard is incorrect in nearly all of his assertions, and he does not understand how numerical representation works, either digitally or in an analog sense. The square root of 2 demonstration as a "loop" is easily proven to be trivial using middle-school mathematical techniques of applying rules of exponents and simplifying expressions. Terrence Howard is a charlatan of the highest order. He has no idea what he is talking about.
@gianni_schicchi3 ай бұрын
Yes, it’s a floating point issue. You can use different data structures to remove that. such as storing it as a fraction in memory but that’s not how calculators choose to work. A more advanced calculator like a physics and graphing or accounting calculator most likely handles numbers in this manner.
@donovanetienne36113 ай бұрын
Biggest problem with the opposing arguments here is he claiming everything youve been taught is wrong and you’re saying he is wrong using the knowledge youve been taught so only thing is happening is a circle of arguments where nobody is really proved wrong or right everyone just claims they are right the other is wrong and nobody is disproving this stuff with experiments like science should be from the beginning we’ve been taught to form a hypothesis and try to disprove thats the bases of science but nobody is trying his models or even experimenting using his theories to try and disprove them they just say its waste of time because it goes against what we’ve known about everything for as long as we have been writing things down
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
precision without accuracy is the mathemagicians' folly, and the grifters' tool.
@jamescarver58763 ай бұрын
@@donovanetienne3611No, you’re under the impression that everything ever taught in class is taken at face value without question. But education is not the same as indoctrination. Educators don’t just say things in class. Things are explained and observed. In science classes, students run their own experiments and come to their own conclusions. This mindset that we’re being indoctrinated in schools is baseless.
@jamescarver58763 ай бұрын
It’s funny because here Terrence pretty much explains that the square root of 2 is 1.414…
@gideonappleseed96323 ай бұрын
Yo been waiting for more terence
@OneRudeBoy3 ай бұрын
Why does Anastasia and Shilo seem to understand Terrence Howard, but nobody else does? Personally, I can’t grasp anything Terrence is saying, however, I have an excellent bs meter and it tells me what he is demonstrating has value.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
Sadly, it may be that they're as dumb as him, whereas others aren't. If I give you one apple, one time, how many apples do you have? 1 apple, 1 time.. 1*1 is....
@Ian-p6w2p3 ай бұрын
Clearly your bs meter needs work all he Terrence does is spew word salad and fail elementary school math
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
They seem to because it's a talk show .. alienate the guest, within arm's length no less ? you think Shilo ever got punched in the mouth ? Anastasia probably did, maybe a few times .. because she can dish it out but fails to, because equanamity is a mindet that people within reach of nutters (and high-strung horses) adopt, and he's looking for a unversity to fund + they're looking for funder fodder. do the math
@OneRudeBoy3 ай бұрын
@@Ian-p6w2p CLEARLY Anastasia and Shilo are understanding him. Means you don’t respect them either.
@piscator_M1-173 ай бұрын
Because what he is saying makes perfect scenes.
@andrewanderson1613 ай бұрын
This was just awesome ❤ he doesn't have to be 💯 correct...but it's a breath of fresh air 👍🏼
@vicvic20813 ай бұрын
God bless you guys
@onwardatlast7 күн бұрын
We are co-creators of our reality by directing our energy intentionally through the exercise of our discretion in each now moment. It is called co-creation because what happens is a function of how each actor shows up in each now moment. Seeing reality from the lens of how things actually happen reveals the need for alignment. An idea will be actualized when a critical mass of actors is ready to receive it. This long-form discussion is very important. Thank you...
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
Is it just me or has anyone else noticed the similarity between Terrence geometric theory of everything and Don Hoffman’s dynamic geometric theory of consciousness?! I think it would be great to have them both and see how these two theories may converge. BTW do I need to mention that from these two theories, I personally and for the Nth time come to this conclusion that consciousness is fundemental and actively participates in creating forms in time-space. The third key note that I derived from this great episode was that maybe the fundemental “form” or “constitution block” of time-space is sth similar to a vortex.
@stoneneils3 ай бұрын
I don't want debate..i want demonstration. If their physics can't do anything new I'm already bored.
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
@@stoneneilsI see, and I highly recommend you find ways to cope with the boredom because scientists are not there to entertain you. If you don’t like and find it unnecessary to first go through these debates, you always have this alternative option to seek higher states of arousal elsewhere like watching TV. And remember, on your way back to watch TV, if you ever hit a wall, you always have this option to return and take an alternative path to lead u to the point rather than getting stuck behind the wall as NPCs do, and hitting it in a thousand samurai ways, in hope that if they hit the wall with a different point of view, it will disappear even if takes an eternity and the whole cycle-system to annihilate. We are not even a type 1 civilisation yet and we are going to extinct while we are stuck behind the walls. You want demonstrations? Its already in front of you, you just need to adjust the tuning system (if u r equipped with one). And seeing is not comprehending especially at the level of manipulating that u desire. So work on your patience ‘cause there is a long way to go .If you want to manipulate time-space you need to first decode what is beyond it not doing the reverse engineering which is taking an eternity meh…
@ShH-31193 ай бұрын
@@mitchellhayman381 why don’t u go check out cognitive biases?! (Please don’t reply back, it’s rhetorical.)your emphasis on the word “never” which was unnecessary btw, was alarming.
@christopherandrews38623 ай бұрын
I understand his efforts especially on the dimension field. Aether is the lubricant that makes frequencies have higher dynamics in life and spirit.
@georgemichelakis12023 ай бұрын
I mean the Aether is Space-Time. Scientists are just confused by what the word physical actually means. Most of them say that energy is not physical so they have complicated something which can be simple. For me anything that exists is physical otherwise it would exist. If spacetime has effects on physical objects then it is physical, just not in the same way that matter is. It is physical in a more subtle form.
@williiayummjay3 ай бұрын
speaking of physical, point toward the direction of time ..
@justinzeller737Ай бұрын
Everything that "exists" is polarized with its opposite therefore physical existence is also polarized with a nonphysical existence that cannot be seen, measured or experienced on this side of the equation.
@bobann3566Ай бұрын
@@williiayummjay Time has no direction, the loss of Aether moves outward and than returns inward and it is measured by time.
@metrab8901Ай бұрын
i think you 'real' not physical. There are non physical things that are real
@bobann3566Ай бұрын
Ken Wheeler loves to use "burning down the haystack to find the needle" and collecting the bits of gold from the "matrix".
@triviamp41493 ай бұрын
If I had teachers like rhis I would want to stay focus in to learn more but I also feel I'm at a different place in my life so I can grap more to want to knkw more & more Thank you for this😂
@rh0msfer443Ай бұрын
Terrance isn't a teacher, he's a moron, if you want to unlearn basic maths and physics then continue listening, Terrance provides no proof of anything, he continually lies and has no written peer reviewed theory on anything he states as fact. No evidence. He's so stupid he can't even express his theories in math because he's so dumb he doesn't even understand the basics of math, instead he simply talks shite. He's the definition of word salads, he uses words together that make no sense because he doesn't even understand the meaning of half the words he uses. I'm here for the lols, listening to him is priceless.
@ellan7871Ай бұрын
Brilliant conversation! Terrence is mindblowing, just as Walter Russell. Their theories do make so much more sense, than Quantum Physics and nonsense mathmatics. Really great work from you both! Thank you!!!
@Lolleka3 ай бұрын
He must have had a lot of fun 3D printing those fancy blocks. There's enough material for a modern art installation.
@chrismonksellye46083 ай бұрын
He makes them by hand one at a time.
@Welcometotheshow3 ай бұрын
Great conversation
@triviamp41493 ай бұрын
I like to learn more om these topics
@wilbertpierce489013 күн бұрын
Let’s say that the people in a stadium are individual particles. When they synchronize their movement to create a fluid motion that is a wave. Like a line dance. Meaning a wave is particles in motion.
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
1:23:00 The female host (sorry, I don't know y'all's names) is making total and complete sense here, regarding units of length/area/volume and the change in dimensions. Terrence Howard is mistaken in his rebuttal. His "Action times action equals a reaction" is a total misstatement and misinterpretation of Newton's third law of motion (What the heck does he mean by "Action times an action"?) He also misstates the Associative and Commutative Laws here, as he's done since 2017 at Oxford - he could literally just look them up. In addition, he also calls sqrt(2) ^ 3 = 2 * sqrt(2) a "contradiction" when in fact it has been demonstrated time and time again (very easy to look up on KZbin) to be a completely natural and consistent mathematical fact, with absolutely NO contradiction to speak of. Despite his calculator tricks.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
He doesn't have calculator tricks. He literally just uses a calculator to show basic facts about arithmetic
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@The.Watcher.2024 "Parlor tricks". Card tricks, really. Like saying "I'll guess whatever number you're thinking of!! Start with the year you were born... Then add this, and subtract that, blah blah... your number is 5!" ..."omg wow, how did you KNOW??" Except that Howard relies on the fact that no one will check the back-of-envelope calculation he's demonstrating, since he tries to confuse them other words like "loop", "unnatural", "illogical". Make no mistake: he's not only a charlatan, but very much also a con-man and a scam-artist
@jaydenwilson95223 ай бұрын
@@jamesdelapena5648 You seem mathematically literate! Can you tell me what logic the Church employed to justify -a*-b=ab when a*b=ab ??? shouldn't a*b= -ab to be consistent with the opposite? And why is Zero on the number line? Counting begins at 1. Measurement at 0. So shouldn't the number line start at 1 and the measurement line start at 0?
@ichigokurosaki28383 ай бұрын
Did you watch it all, she wasn't really confident and rightfully so. Her counterpart understood what Terrance means and I think she did too later on.
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
@@jaydenwilson9522 why would 0 not be on the number line when it's a number and it is less than 1 and more than -1???
@timjohnson39133 ай бұрын
@1:32:00 No you don’t need theta. Meters squared is the identifier that you are now working with areas. One dimension was 1 meter; Two dimensions 1x1 is 1 meter squared.
@ichigokurosaki28383 ай бұрын
Did you look into the Who, What, Where, Why and How in regards to the creation of the 1 x 1 special condition?
@jessieadore3 ай бұрын
Oh you know it’s boutta get real when the sleeves come off 40 min in 😭😭
@The.Watcher.20243 ай бұрын
Hilarious
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
It's weird watching him in his wifebeater.... especially since that particular style of shirt describes him perfectly.
@megamond3 ай бұрын
Or when he raises his voice - does he think he's on "The View"?
@ichigokurosaki28383 ай бұрын
@jamesdelapena5648 It's interesting seeing the energy you have towards Terrance Howard. Tell us how you really feel?
@jamesdelapena56483 ай бұрын
@@ichigokurosaki2838 lol, I've been covering Terrence Howard on my YTchannel (this one I'm commenting from) for quite a while now. I'm somewhat of a Terrence Howard biographer, as a hobby.
@matthewhoch785222 күн бұрын
I really do believe that Terrance is a very knowledgeable man and means well and wants great things. Also he is responsible for the new jersey drone situation 😂😂
@greggkroodsma81973 ай бұрын
What excites me is the concept of the word 'foundation' and I put the concept together with the concept of religion, the basis. The foundation is something that can be placed in or on. Maybe you could call it a presented unexpressed blueprint. The 'matrix,' maybe? When speaking of the wave, I think of the direction of the way, the way directive. Corpuscles, bubbles, steam, vapor, etc. Those words are so refreshingly meaningful. The Rock of the Earth had a foundation laid on it. The corpuscle of the Earth was situated in a foundation. Isaiah 48:13 Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together. So, the foundation is a something that can be 'stood up' like a frame. I guess that something was called 'ether.' The foundation is an ether that responds. When the I am of you calls upon the ether to respond, the ether expresses itself together with the surround. (That was an immediate input of information after listening for just 16 minutes.) Now I am speaking of the psychological nature. When Terrence describes harmonic nodes, that could illustrate the seven Chakras down the spine. Oh, so exciting! Electricity and Magnetism. Quantum electrodynamics. The picture that forms in my visual cortex that flows in the wave of quantum dynamics is of the left-brain and the right-brain and the myriad fibrous connections between the two. There is no other structured element or thing in the outer world that is made of anything that the brain is. The old-timey fan engines with the tight winding chords of copper wires are a close illustration of a brain performing one task. A fan on a stand is just a person doing one thing. It breaks, you throw it away. That has evolved into the psychology of war. "Marge, the fan 's not workin'." "Is it plugged in?" Hmmm . . . Are you plugged in to the ether? Floride. Oh boy! White teeth! Too much Floride will eat your teeth for dinner. But, breathing too high of a concentration of Oxygen will kill you, see. There is a foundation, a pattern, a matrix. It's like a well-defined surfboard that rides the waves. The waves are created by the harmony of the ether and you, the I am. The point of the interaction between the concepts of left and right, up and down, in and out. Drifting out of the dimension. Let's go with the concepts of Chakras, energy centers, and the brain. People try to 'activate' their Chakras by listening to sounds, the Solfeggio frequencies. That does ergonomically create patterns that correspond to the harmonious interactions of the elements. A tempo, a speed, a vibration. Gravity creates archetypes, language. Gravity is like the force bouncing off the wall.
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
Foundation is not unexpressed blueprint. But.. hm let say - The Principle of Incommensurability - is. Nice paragraph from fractalwoman "Counter-space, Space, Fractal In the beginning was counter-space, and god said “let there be space”. Space and counter-space are incommensurate principles. Counter-space is not space and space is not counter-space. Space is the absence of counter-space and vice versa. Counter-space and space form a conjugate relationship which is responsible for the phenomenon known as fractal. In nature, fractals appear BETWEEN the domains of space and counter-space. Counter-space is what is missing from the language of modern physics. Counter-space is the missing piece of the puzzle. Without the concept of counter-space, unification is impossible."
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
"The picture that forms in my visual cortex that flows in the wave of quantum dynamics is of the left-brain and the right-brain and the myriad fibrous connections between the two." haaa. to protal/window to akash/intuition/whatever literally opens up between brainsides. for a period of time, when under energy torture, i accidentally learned how to go level up, an see how it "visually works". now i have some uncanny connection to other side and truths comes trough sometimes. Usually after i detect BS, then correct data comes through. Its like searching for the book in the library. At least one keyword would be nice ;-) The more bs around the lies, the more easily is also truth is also visible/accessible. I have an erie feeling that language and fake concepts keeps the door to akash looked. You cant search for things that is not there. if you wanna know, lets take it somewhere else, they dont let me talk here in details. Forbidden. Im a forbidden dude. :D
@greggkroodsma81973 ай бұрын
@@v2ike6udik Principle of Incommensurability . . . not apples and oranges, but nothing of one in the other. Like darkness and shining.
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
@@greggkroodsma8197 "Darkness, Light, Colour In the beginning was darkness, and god said “let there be light”. Darkness and light are incommensurate principles. Light is not darkness and darkness is not light. Darkness is the absence of light, and vice versa. Darkness and light form a conjugate relationship resulting in phenomenon we perceive as colour. Every colour of light oscillates at a different frequency. Frequency is BETWEEN darkness and light. Light oscillates BETWEEN space and counter-space." :)
@v2ike6udik3 ай бұрын
@@greggkroodsma8197 "Deterministic, Unpredictable, Chaos In the beginning was deterministic, and god said “let there be unpredictable”. Deterministic and unpredictable are incommensurate principles. Deterministic is not unpredictable and vice versa. Chaos, as in chaos theory, is the conjugate of determinism and unpredictability. In mathematics, chaotic systems are both unpredictable and deterministic. Although the output of a chaotic equation is completely determined by its input parameters, the output value cannot be predicted with any certainty. Chaos is BETWEEN these two incommensurate principles. This is why chaos is closely related to fractal geometry. Fractals appear BETWEEN incommensurate states."