Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code FOUNDOUT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: incogni.com/foundout
@edwardfletcher7790Ай бұрын
It's "BOGAN VILLE"... Please ask your script team to make an effort with your placenames !!
@mingfanzhang4600Ай бұрын
😊😊😊
@mingfanzhang8927Ай бұрын
😊
@brsrc759Ай бұрын
Bro I love your videos but you speak way too fast.
@mingfanzhang8927Ай бұрын
@ #Islamm#KFC
@J.MacInnesАй бұрын
Winters are long and cold in Canada, especially in Manitoba- that a guy did this doesn't really surprise me. It's become a common urban legend- someone building something in their basement or garage- and then having no idea how to get it out without taking out a wall.
@craigquannАй бұрын
You're wrong. Taking the wall down was part of the plan the whole time! Lol
@HoundMonkeyАй бұрын
I recently watched a video of a guy filming his neighbor put a lift kit on a truck in his garage only to have to take it apart and lower it again because it wouldn't fit through the door.
@CanadianAmericans4TrumpАй бұрын
I was born in Winnipeg but lived 2 hours North in Ashern between lake Manitoba and lake Winnipeg and it would be so cold in the winter and then in the summer so many mosquitoes and bugs
@capt.bart.roberts4975Ай бұрын
I knew a mate of my brother's, who built a commercial fishing vessel in his back garden. They had to rent a crane to get it over the house and on to the low loader! That made the local news. It's still being run by his grandson.
@UpperDarbyDetailingАй бұрын
It isn’t even an urban legend. On Top Gear UK (the middle not that was good) James May (iirc) interviewed a guy building a car in his kitchen that later intended to take a wall out. Apparently it started with rebuilding a carburetor in the kitchen “because it was warm in there and that’s where the tea is” until he built the whole car in their instead of the originally planned upon garage.
@brucemitchell5637Ай бұрын
I saw an program about him many years ago, he is a mechanical genius. Having said that he's also " eccentric ", AKA bat s**t crazy! He put an inground swimming pool in his living room and was trying to get backing for building a steam powered airplane. His fabrication and restoration skills were second to none, he was in demand all over the world for restoring WW2 aircraft.
@pete_lindАй бұрын
Ground effect planes are Finnish invention Toivo Kaario made one in 1930s , 1942-44 in Charlottenburg in Berlin he was learning how to build airplane engines. He also patented "bell wing" similar to hovercraft , but it has rigid skirt, that result in higher speed on ice 1959 He was in Princeton in Symposium on Ground Effect Phenomena as expert and 1960 US military was interested in ground effect plane All ended in accident 1961 , ground effect prototype was completely destroyed , Toivo Kaario got only few bruises, and all backers vanished.
@DumbledoreMcCrackenАй бұрын
I saw that documentary too. Watching further videos about him, his rebuilding skill were actually quite poor. There's a video about a Japanese Zero fighter he rescued, which was too dangerous to fly after he destroyed the structure extracting it from the jungle.
@Nick-v7b3lАй бұрын
@DumbledoreMcCracken did you watch the whole video? He brings it up.
@Nick-v7b3lАй бұрын
All his "restorations" were done incorrectly. Had had no clue about flightworthiness regulations and just slapped stuff together to make it "look good". He may have been "eccentric" but as an aircraft mechanic of many years myself, we have a word for people like him. Hack.
@monad_tcp26 күн бұрын
Its too sad that he was too late for our managerial times where everything is so bureaucratic and you can't do anything anymore without kissing some stup1d official. It makes all the effort putting into containing the Soviet Union seems pointless, we became the Soviet Union, just look at the EU. The enemy we should have been fighting wasn't the Russians, but the bureaucrats. It became painfully obvious in 2020 after the "minor flu crisis". Its the leviathan that is the enemy, the central planned government. We were supposed to be better than that, but no, even thou the economical system is capitalism (or was), we still got to the same place. We should take the power back from the managerial elites. Become unmanageable !
@michaellowe3665Ай бұрын
This is just the kind of ingenuity it takes to build a passenger submarine to visit the Titanic.
@NoIce33Ай бұрын
Apparently, he was very good at proving that things deemed impossible by specialists are indeed impossible.
@schwarzerritter572428 күн бұрын
You don't know for sure until you try.
@wavygravy63Ай бұрын
The title of this channel sure nailed it for me. As a 60 year old Winnipeger I never heard this story. Thx for the enlightenment 😀
@Strider91Ай бұрын
Dude, I'm from Morden and never heard of this guy. He doesn't even get mentioned in the town history. Wtf
@amejaremyАй бұрын
If you ask some of the local pilots they will tell you about him. Bob Gerbrandt could tell you all about it.
@johnpatz8395Ай бұрын
I’m not someone that thinks everyone needs a to go to college, in fact I openly oppose that idea. But the phrase “self taught engineer” sounds like it’s the first line in countless disaster stories
@SevenSixTwo2012Ай бұрын
For a guy who's been restoring very functional propeller fighter planes all his life, his "defender" project sure lacked a lot of inspiration. You'd think he'd just copy the best features from a few WWII fighters and call it a day, as opposed to trying to reinvent the wheel and fail continuously.
@ScottATАй бұрын
I think they tied his hands by copyright infringement
@Kaltagstar96Ай бұрын
Just imagine being old man Jiro Horikoshi and you get a phone call out of the blue from some dude in Canada asking about restoring one of the planes that you designed? I'm not even sure how you'd respond to that.
@zurielsssАй бұрын
Ok desu
@ReddotzebraАй бұрын
Ground effect vehicles ARE super super efficient and cool... As long as the terrain you're skimming over is relatively flat (As in: Even waves are a problem if they get big enough) and as long as you want to fly in a straight line and don't turn ever. If not, they become clumsy and potentially super dangerous.
@ericferguson9989Ай бұрын
Fortunately, Manitoba is very flat country.
@YeeSoestАй бұрын
So they're like Dictatorships and Twitter: Only a good idea under ultra unrealistic circumstances that aren't even intended to be achieved
@YeeSoestАй бұрын
Only good under perfect and therefore unrealistic conditions: just like Dictatorships Or Twitter Or the Clippers
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
@@ericferguson9989 Manitoba is not nearly flat enough for a WIG craft, other than over lakes.
@gpaull2Ай бұрын
As a Canadian with a career and and passion in aviation spanning several decades, I have never heard of this guy. If he is a “Canadian folk hero” he isn’t much of one.
@Redmenace96Ай бұрын
I don't get it, either.
@capt.bart.roberts4975Ай бұрын
My brother's, father-in-law was in The RCAF, during WW2. After the war he worked as a test pilot at DeHavilland Aircraft. He was one of the guys flying observation when Geoffrey DeHavilland augered into the ground trying to break the sound barrier. He ended up flying during The Berlin Airlift. He was a very soft spoken and self contained man. His knowledge and gentle humour was a great loss.
@stejer211Ай бұрын
What does this have to do with the video, other than you trying to score internet points over someone else's accomplishments?
@Rick-k7mАй бұрын
@@stejer211right? Apparently his brother also had a friend who built a commercial fishing boat in their backyard and then needed a crane to load it onto the trailer. Sounds like his brother has the cool stories and he's been riding his brothers coattails his whole life🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣or he's full of shit. That's more likely 🤣
@stejer211Ай бұрын
@@Rick-k7m In any case, he's going to need a bigger boat to store all of his sailor stories.
@Rick-k7mАй бұрын
@ lmfaooooo good one🤣
@antoniovillanueva308Ай бұрын
No need for a chute, the prop is gonna get you anyway. I like the logic.
@welshpete12Ай бұрын
The Germans had the same problem with a late WW 2 aircraft . So they had a system built in , that would use explosives to blow off the propellers before injecting .
@mechadrake28 күн бұрын
@@welshpete12 same with some heli eject system. at least one used dropable rotor for that reason.
@stephen316427 күн бұрын
I mean, if he knew the prop placement was an issue, what did he plan pilots in combat situations would do when their low and slow plane was predictably hit with gunfire?
@notatallheng21 күн бұрын
@@stephen3164 The guy's concept of warfare was to throw as many bodies as he could at the enemy. I think the answer to your question has three letters...
@TheHenirik16 күн бұрын
Not everyone like that logic, which is why SAAB was the first company to have ejection seats as standard equipment.
@Paladin1873Ай бұрын
A pilot at our local airport restored several WWII trainers in the 1970s. I went up with him in his North American SNJ (Navy version of the AT6 Texan trainer, aka the Harvard in Commonwealth use). He too sourced parts from anywhere and everywhere, including spent 22 LR casings which he discovered worked well enough as ersatz brass fittings on the engine. When he later sold his collection, I heard from my brother that the new owners were aghast once they uncovered the "workmanship" applied to these planes. Oh well, they weren't the first customers he had suckered.
@kjfett3Ай бұрын
It's interesting that someone who spent so much time rebuilding combat aircraft would fail so badly in their own attempt at building a combat aircraft. It goes to show that just because you can build something or even piece it back together to make it work, doesn't mean you understand "how" it works.
@santawashere487729 күн бұрын
According to the video most his restorations needed fixing or complete redesigns afterwards too though
@fl00fydragonАй бұрын
so basically he wanted swarms of expendible and cheap drones, but with pilots. Canadian TIE fighter. But much, much slower.
@kineticdeathАй бұрын
imagine these running into a a soviet armored push, complete with ZSU-23-4's...
@kauskeАй бұрын
@@kineticdeath With a 300 pound armoured bathtub to sit in, it will have to be the ground that kills you at least. Also that's assuming that no one sold all the AA bullets to buy food, this is a long running issue for the Soviets and now Russians.
@dereksollows9783Ай бұрын
He was reinventing the wheel (or the Volksjager). The Super Tucano and the Sky Warden are the current best in class for this aircraft type. An interesting guy. I just read the earlier comment which mentions the OV-10 Bronco, which I had forgotten about when naming the examples above. THAT aircraft has the same heritage except that the two (marine??) pilots(?) who developed it were recently returned from a combat environment in South-East Asia. It was super appropriate for improvised airstrips in 'forward' areas. Things kept evolving as technology advanced and along came the A-10, which does not operate from too forward a base but is fast enough to get forward in a hurry. The unit cost in 1970 was about the same as the today(inflated) cost of the ammo load for the GAU-8 gatling cannon. I would note that Canada did not seriously consider the OV-10 or the A-10 as our Armed Forces did not perceive a role for either aircraft without also owning an air superiority type like the F-18 -and- the weapons systems which we had planned to deliver were nuclear, requiring a fast getaway.
@neglectfulsausage7689Ай бұрын
If the enemy has 100,000 ATA missiles you just need 100,001 planes.
@neglectfulsausage7689Ай бұрын
I mean lets be real here. In war you're going to have casualties. Omaha beach was literally "expendable drones". IF he had suceeded the same practice would just carry into the skies. Which I've advocated for myelf. Get cheap aircraft, minimal training needed to fly it, and just have them be "sky infantry".
@samiraperi467Ай бұрын
4:46 That's an F-104, not an F-014.
@kineticdeathАй бұрын
For all interested, a Bolingbroke is a Canadian variant of the Bristol Blenheim. I had to go research Bristol twin engine bombers to find that out.
@ellagrant6190Ай бұрын
Yeah I had to do the same. I wasn't familiar with the word he used. It appeared to be a Blenheim to me so I looked them up and found the MKIV was also called the Bolingbroke.
@MrFaabalaАй бұрын
Reinventing the ov-10
@edwardfletcher7790Ай бұрын
In heavy steel with a tiny engine....🤡
@andrewcantrell139Ай бұрын
That's kinda what I thought the video was about from the title. Because the Bronco prototype was built built in a garage by two guys.
@CAP198462Ай бұрын
I was thinking Cessna O-2 Skymaster but I can see the Bronco too.
@RETOKSQUIDАй бұрын
It sounds like an episode of the Red Green show😅
@peddler931Ай бұрын
I remember going to his field as a kid in the pre-defender days. The Val restoration was recently completed, and I crawled through a few of the WW II birds.
@robertpearson8798Ай бұрын
But of course, tens of thousands of aircraft would require tens of thousands of pilots, tens of thousands of maintenance personnel, an untold number of support staff and enormous infrastructure to support it all. I remember seeing a program on this guy and thought at the time that he was a few passengers short of a full plane. I also remember when The Commemorative Airforce was still called The Confederate Airforce but I suppose that too many people didn’t appreciate the irony. They did send some wonderful aircraft up here to the Hamilton International Airshow though.
@EMS.Fire.WelderАй бұрын
No way!!! My dad was a member at that airport and knew everyone closely!!! Even had the chance to sit in that aircraft!!! So cool to actually have my town in a video
@timbrwolf1121Ай бұрын
You're shitting me! This guy got the last zero prints from jiro??? That needs a whole video!
@Rob.DB.Ай бұрын
Im sure they were copies. But intriguing stuff id also like to hear that one!
@user-pn3im5sm7k29 күн бұрын
I respect Mr. Horikoshi even more now. He didn't have to do that but like any great artist, appreciates when somebody enjoys their artwork.
@SMDoktorPepperАй бұрын
So the same idea that keeps the A10 flying
@ReddotzebraАй бұрын
"We wanted to bring this absolutely massive gun into the air so it could perforate enemy armor, so we built a plane around it!" And now everyone is trying to come up with enough reasons to take it out of service.
@kauskeАй бұрын
@@Reddotzebra Top attack ATGMs fired by guys zipping around on E-biles and FPV AT drones are basically enough reason to take it out of service. Add in modern fighters lobbing guided munitions from over the horizon, and it's basically outdated in every conceivable way.
@philalcoceli6328Ай бұрын
@kauske While you are right on what you said, you are leaving out its infantry supporting role, which is now being tried to replace by cheaper but flimsy Super Tucano prop planes, etc. Lobbing guided bombs is a great idea on paper but infantry combat is most times close and personal, where the Warthog excels. Even guided bombs can cause fratricide, as a human is usually best at preventing that (fails notwithstanding) when kept on the loop, and the combining of both the A-10 in close direct coordination with such bombs and weapons is an even better idea.
@grahamhufton7715Ай бұрын
Should do ‘project grizzly’ that guy was nuts too
@jeffreycarman2185Ай бұрын
How interesting. I can’t help but draw the comparison with David Hahn, the Radioactive Boy Scout. It takes a lot of drive and determination to keep going forward on something that is so outside the realm of the norm, and in the face of decades of failure. Kudos and god speed.
@cascadianrangers728Ай бұрын
The point behind the Defender reminds me a lot of the reasoning behind the Super Tucano prop powered, long endurance attack and recon plane, Bob was really forward thinking and dozens of countries in the world are now using cheap, prop powered light aircraft along with supersonic fighter jets.
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
A huge difference is hat the Super Tucano is a soundly designed and functional aircraft, while Bob's crap didn't even fly.
@cz2681Ай бұрын
This sounds like the red green show did an aviation episode
@GeneralBraeАй бұрын
"No no you don't need parachute, the propellor will just kill you instantly anyway" Can't see why that approach didn't work out for him with the authorities
@Freesavh1776Ай бұрын
That auto front tire really gives a chuckle. 😂😂😂
@travisinthetrunkАй бұрын
“Confederate Air Force?”
@danh6720Ай бұрын
Basically it means a bunch of people who individually owned the historic aircraft agreed to cooperate on various things. Check the definition of “confederation” for an idea of the organization. Has nothing to do with the Confederate States of America. They changed their name to the Commemorative Air Force since confederate while being a perfectly reasonable word by definition caused too much confusion.
@thea.m.p.co.467Ай бұрын
@@danh6720*Swastika* _has entered the chat..._
@chrisball3778Ай бұрын
Today I found out about a weird Canadian guy with the same name as me. I like that. The idea behind the prototype aircraft isn't actually bad- there is a whole class of Close Air Support Aircraft, that do pretty much what he described, the best known being the A10 Warthog. It's just a shame that wasn't what the Canadian Air Force asked for, and that his design for one was so bad.
@SubiLifeCoАй бұрын
At some point in life most people hit their head against a wall long enough and say- well that's not a good way to pass through since there is door in the wall anyways
@stevewiles7132Ай бұрын
When I was a kid, I envisioned the compulsory ( in time of war ), conversion of thousands of private planes such as Cessna's, into mass attack light bombers.
@thatjeff7550Ай бұрын
Well I mean his theory was fairly sound. Let's go over what he wanted to do: A slower, low-flying aircraft that could spot tanks and engage them. A front mounted weapon to destroy said tanks. A rear-mounted propulsion system to allow the weapon mounted in the nose of the craft. An armored "bathtub" to protect the pilot since it would be slow and low to the ground. An aircraft that was much cheaper to fly than the jets the US wanted to sell Canada. And finally, an aircraft to help NATO defend against an Russian attack. Dude had the concept of a A-10 Thunderbolt but just didn't have the capacity to build it.
@Skinflaps_MeatslapperАй бұрын
That's akin to listing specs for a F1 racecar and the end result is building a gokart. The problem with low and slow aircraft is that they might as well be flying target practice, not only will the jets decimate you, but just about any belt fed machine gun on the ground would take you out too. Not to mention all of the manpads and such. It doesn't matter if the cockpit is armored or not...if your plane is made of formed aluminum sheets, it only means that you'll be in good health as you're spiraling to your death in a flaming bathtub. The A-10 is not as survivable of an aircraft as you might think, so probably not the best example anyway.
@thatjeff7550Ай бұрын
@@Skinflaps_Meatslapper the A-10 is as survivable aircraft as I think? Out of 8,000 missions in Desert Storm & Shield, only six were shot down. I'm not comparing them to aircraft of today; I'm comparing them to the role in the time period they were designed and built.
@Skinflaps_MeatslapperАй бұрын
@@thatjeff7550 They would've been a great replacement for the A1 in Vietnam, but by the time pen turned to plane, they were primarily expected to be used in the Fulda Gap strategy. In that role, they expected a very high loss rate. The entire fleet of 700 or so A-10's were projected to last about a week of combat before they were all downed. The problem is that any CAS aircraft is going to be extremely vulnerable, regardless of how up armored and tough it is compared to other aircraft, due to it being low and slow. It's a sitting duck in highly contested airspace, which is why the A-10 was only ever used in combat after air superiority and uncontested airspace was achieved. What people fail to realize is that even though an A-10 might come back with half a wing or most of its tail missing, it's done. Written off and scrapped. The only effective difference between coming home on a wing and a prayer and punching out is that the pilot got a ride home and didn't have to rely on anyone to extract him. The enemy took out the plane either way you look at it. So unless you've got a rather substantial force of air superiority fighters to clear the way for something like an A-10, you're cooked. That hypothetical massive fleet of A-10's isn't going to do much beyond keeping your combat SAR teams busy. Nobody in their right mind would send them out unless they had clear skies, and they wouldn't amount to a hill of beans in any near peer engagement, so your troops on the ground needing CAS won't be getting any support at all. That's why the USAF has been trying to get rid of them in favor of something that IS more survivable in contested airspace, so they CAN send air support.
@JacobNeff-oq5km28 күн бұрын
@@thatjeff7550 No. No, it isn't. Trying to take the hit is just fundamentally far less effective than not getting hit at all. At least one of those were downed with a Igla, the soviet counterpart to the fim-92 stinger. Meanwhile, it was responsible for more friendly fire than every other aircraft combined while both the aardvark and even the fighting falcon absolutely smoked it in the CAS role.
@JacobNeff-oq5km28 күн бұрын
@@Skinflaps_Meatslapper You appear to be falling into the common misunderstanding of what the close in CAS means. It is referring to how close the ordinance is landing to friendlies, not how close the supporting aircraft is getting to the enemy. Both the F-16 and F-111 far outperformed the A-10 in the CAS role in desert storm, but they did it from a couple miles up.
@chandlerbennett456228 күн бұрын
“He climbed into the cockpit and made that twin bloss blare. He gunned it down the runway and we watched him disappear. We knew he was a thoroughbred when he pushed her through the gate. For in that Pratt and Whitney were fifteen hundred pounds of hate.” -Bob Diemert
@Roger_GustafssonАй бұрын
The world need many more of these kind of people!
@storm_shadow78Ай бұрын
It sounds dumb but overwhelming air defences is what they're going to do with drones
@ianmacdiarmid1249Ай бұрын
With drones, it's a viable strategy. With a pilot in a plane, not so much.
@daray666Ай бұрын
Did he even once waste a thought that this thing would also be able to carry a substantial payload to be of any use?
@capt.bart.roberts4975Ай бұрын
Gentlemen, listening to his description of his concept. I give you The Grumman A-10 Warthog!
@johnnycaps1Ай бұрын
Possibly the Republic Aviation A-10 Warthog? Grumman and Republic both with roots on Long Island, NY.
@Hobbes4everАй бұрын
it reminds me of those Canadian cars in South Park
@PaulMcCartExperienceАй бұрын
My dad was an aerospace engineer involved in defense work in the 1070s and I remember hearing about a lot of this. There were many at the time making the argument for many more cheaper warbirds. You don’t hear that argument much anymore.
@harryricochet8134Ай бұрын
Ah yes, the decade after the Battle of Hastings was huge for aerospace defence work. There was a lot of research into eye arrow technology I heard.
@SashazurАй бұрын
With the Ukraine war there’s been lots of use of drones and consequent recognition of their utility. I think drones are going to be the solution when you need lots of cheap aircraft.
@TehLawl101Ай бұрын
So, since it never flew it was more of a "ground craft" than an aircraft.
@tuc-dh4dfАй бұрын
I saw the TV programme on Bob years a go, and his crazy looking genius partner, I could not make my mind up, the guy was so focused
@jtd8719Ай бұрын
Simon, you should look into the Christmas Bullet. At least the subject of this video was actually trying and had some skills.
@antoniovillanueva308Ай бұрын
This is the Shahed 136 with a pilot. Simon, do the Shaed 136 and related drones?
@asylumental28 күн бұрын
Lol imagine if he succeeded and just 1 quirky canadian from Manitoba became more successful and influential than the entire Avro Canada company 😂
@rickbowker4179Ай бұрын
If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy. Keep your stick on the ice, we're all in this together.
@bysshe51Ай бұрын
Thanks Red
@---l---Ай бұрын
I won't be at the meeting next week. got to run this load out to Port Asbestos.
@Arnor220728 күн бұрын
Simp
@winstonsmith478Ай бұрын
His swarms of small, cheap, manned combat aircraft now realized by smaller, cheaper, unmanned drone swarms.
@StevenBanks123Ай бұрын
He never backed down in the face of facts
@ironcityblueАй бұрын
He should have called it "stealth" painted it black and charged 20 billion per copy. Easy sale.
@mavrickharris351328 күн бұрын
The concept is actually genius. The problem is it already exists in the form of the a-10. Could be a lot cheaper though drones prove that
@douglasclerk2764Ай бұрын
If he'd only thought of reducing the weight by taking the pilot out, he may have been on the way to developing a drone. He had a lot of the rest of that idea in place.
@an0mndrАй бұрын
Met diemert once at a fly-in in kamloops my grandpa took me to about 20 years ago. He was in town to help someone that was trying to replicate one of his designs. Definitely a pretty eccentric guy, though if I'm being honest, as a 14 year old I was paying more attention to the car collection of the guy that was building the plane than the planes themselves.
@daveb44465 сағат бұрын
There are actually quite a few civilian VLJs that use turbines from cruise missiles. Since they don’t require the wings to be foldable they can carry several thousand pounds more than a cruise missile. I’m surprised there aren’t any military aircraft that have utilized the same engines, because that’s definitely enough payload to be useful for strike or drone hunting. They could probably just bolt the predator avionics to one to a VLJ to act as a heavy strike drone. Even the smallest VLJ can carry 1300lbs. It’s a third the cost of the Predator and a tenth of the Reaper, but has several times the payload as the Predator, but half that of the Reaper. Which for the cost is still light years better than either. For the same cost you could build a twin engine VLJ that would annihilate either. You would think the technology would be more widely implemented, instead of just a few civilian implementations. Because they obviously fill a very useful military niche.
@echinorlaxАй бұрын
I think he lived long enough to see that he was actually right. Cheap flying vehicles, priced in thousands not millions, are one of key elements of modern battlefield and their importance in the nearest future will only increase. The only thing he failed to understand was that the solution to his massive bathtub problem was removing the pilot - and the bathtub - from the equation altogether.
@NoIce33Ай бұрын
Getting it airborne would have helped a lot, too.
@echinorlaxАй бұрын
@@NoIce33 I assumed the moment he got rid of pilot and his bathtub, the weight of the plane would fall below the amount of lift produced at liftoff speed - with the weight being higher than lift being the main problem of the version with the bathtub from what I understood from the material :)
@MrDexter9i329 күн бұрын
Man, that chatgpt working hard. It sure has a recognizable style. I wonder how it didn't evolve itself by now.
@THESocialJusticeWarriorАй бұрын
Bob Simple would be proud of him.
@gettingby365Ай бұрын
The craziest thing about this guy is that he lived to the age of 85 😅
@jackalovski1Ай бұрын
If only he’d have made it a drone he could have ditched the armoured cockpit and would have been way ahead of his time. It does have a striking resemblance to a whole bunch of drones and aircraft now being used in various militaries
@Rob.DB.Ай бұрын
Wow good point & observation ! That would have been epic!
@genericfakename8197Ай бұрын
All he would have had to do is single handely invent cheap, light, tiny, and powerful computers 40 years early. Do you have any idea what electronics were like in the 80s?
@jackalovski1Ай бұрын
@@genericfakename8197 pretty sure even 80s tv camera, computers and transmitter/receiver setup plus servos isn’t going to weigh as much as an armoured cockpit and a human. I myself am also from the 80s so I have a good idea what was available at the time. But that would be a very cool project to try and create. 80s punk attack drone 👍
@acmelkaАй бұрын
I'm so glad Simon trimmed up that crazy hermit/ homeless/ Taliban beard. Looking good!
@DiscoworxАй бұрын
The world needs more men and women like Bob.
@Rob.DB.Ай бұрын
Here here!
@DrFluffyАй бұрын
4:52 Fighting Falcon. Not Flying Falcon.
@kineticdeathАй бұрын
and or "Viper" in american circles. And yeah it took me like 30 years to learn thats what they called it.
@sparky4878Ай бұрын
@@kineticdeathit’s still officially called the Fighting Falcon. Viper is a nickname.
@deanallenjonesАй бұрын
About the sponser. I need to check that out. I started getting adverts for books about kicking Cocaine. I never touched the stuff ever. I giggled at how wrong the algorythm was. A week later A freind admited to haveing a huge coke problem and was trying to quite and wanted support. They don't just show you adverts they think you want, they show your freinds!
@Rob.DB.Ай бұрын
Hmmmm...did your friend ever use your computer??? If no it still isn't surprising to me because advertising is a unscrupulous form of evil that manipulates & prays on everyone. Since coke is so addictive & you are a friend it made a correlation that u could be hooked too or know about their problem & may wanna help. Money makes people come up with a computer algorithm that attempts to get you to spend,spend,spend! With no "confusing "parameters like ethics, wage income, outstanding debt, mental health, or other financial responsibilities. That doesn't matter . Just consistently diagnosing you to better separate you from your $ !!!
@joshm3484Ай бұрын
A slight problem with the "overwhelm with numbers" strategy is a pilot is more expensive than a plane.
@grimmig1328 күн бұрын
Diemert and Semple should have joined forces to build a flying tank... call it the Dimple by Bob&Bob
@ellisvener5337Ай бұрын
According to an account in Ian Toll’s “The Conquering Tide: War in the Pacific 1943-1944” to get freshly built A6M “Zero” aircraft from the Mitsubishi factory they needed to hauled by a team of oxen and later Percheron horses, from the factory to the nearest airfield, a few miles away.
@byzmack1334Ай бұрын
He was a few decades too early. The USA just bought a bunch of aircraft to fill the role he was trying to build. lol.
@c0n7rac0n7rolc0nraАй бұрын
"His greatest adversary ever" I was sure he was going to say Gravity lol Seems like he would have been way better suited literally starting with a Cessna and modifying it until the original aircraft was gone. At least then he could have been sure he began with an airworthy plane. But he doesn't strike me as someone willing to accept failure as an option no matter how many flashing red lights and buzzers told him it was a really dumb idea .
@supernoodles91Ай бұрын
'Sir, that madman is asking for $25k for a research grant, what should I tell him? That the funds aren't available or that he's mad as a box o frogs?'
@max_archerАй бұрын
Really interesting story, I've actually seen at least one of his planes (the "Val" at Planes of Fame) but had never heard about him before. By the way, just FYI, the "Ji" in "Jiro" sounds like an English "G" (gee). The most commonly used system of Japanese romanization was developed by an American so most pronunciations are relatively intuitive for English speakers.
@thebritishengineer8027Ай бұрын
The fact that the guy proved those that "those listened to were wrong" makes the guy more right. It's people like this the visionary’s that prove everyone else wrong. A light slow moving plane able to hunt down and kill tanks, cheap, effective and in numbers.... Pretty much the Orlan series of Russian Drones able to seek and laz targets for a number of very effective munitions including the Kraznapol that has reaped utter destruction on Uranian armour and static targets. Right idea, slightly different tech.
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
But he didn't prove anyone wrong - his"aircraft" didn't even fly.
@thebritishengineer8027Ай бұрын
@@brianb-p6586 Do you work in government or the post office...? In 2003 I built one of the fastest graphics PC's in Britain, it's job to interpellate PAL to NTSC converting it from 24 to 29 frames a second. Encoding that signal to send it compressed over a single CAT5 to be uncompressed in real time. Simply, it converting DVD to HD720 to run on Plasma TV's. Too expensive & too large as a viable product, was it a failure no. Became the base tech for the scalar is in current TV's and the PS/XBox twiddle box's. You can't broadcast HD, the consoles can't process a true HD image even Blue Ray disks are diluted. So like this guy, the product was not sound, but the idea went on to bigger things as technology improved/miniaturised. It's about vision.
@JinKeeАй бұрын
6:05 it looks EXACTLY like the unmanned Bayraktar TB2
@ronaldharris6569Ай бұрын
There's a documentary on KZbin about the defender.this is the idea of the drone swarm but its trying to make a manned version
@capt.bart.roberts4975Ай бұрын
I'm a colonel in The Confederate Air Force, I was introduced by Nick Lowe. That was a very blurry week.
@daveb44465 сағат бұрын
I thought this was going to be about drones. The first predator was built in a garage using amateur hobby parts from ultralights. They still use Rotax hobby engines.
@mavericmorph5358Ай бұрын
He should have focus on a private light air craft for the masses.
@BillMcSwainАй бұрын
Love the channel!
@johnvan6082Ай бұрын
I guess this guy was a big fan of the CHRISTMAS BULLET . Feel free to make a video about that " airplane " .
@Strider91Ай бұрын
Dude!! I grew up in Morden!! Just went back last year for Corn and Apple. I literally never heard of this guy. . .WHY DO I NOW KNOW ABOUT THIS GUY!?!?
@kiwishamoo649420 күн бұрын
The "Semple Tank" of the air 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@SpawndukesАй бұрын
I like your cloths these past couple years. good on ya.
@MacEriuАй бұрын
Sounds like something I made in Kerbal Space Program.
@shadow4evrАй бұрын
@4:40 Ouch- writers need to check their number. Canadair CF-104, not CF-014.
@JosephHolness-u2mАй бұрын
When Designers and Engineers have been sniffing their maker pens too much.
@namepending155Ай бұрын
To me ground effect planes sound great except hopping over ships, rough seas and whatever else. I think I also heard that due to flying at low(est) altitude, they are in the densest air available and the increased drag offsets the ground effect benefit. That source never mentioned low altitude also means the most horsepower from that dense air. Over a tundra you would have cold (denser) air, so even more power and no obstacles. Cold dense air is great for controlling a plane. Anyways, always wondered why nothing at least reliable enough to get experience and data from has never reached fruition. I heard there are a couple tiny bay shuttles in existence.
@andyjwagnerАй бұрын
There’s no shortage of cranks in the world. Not sure why this particular one deserves a video.
@kentnebergall315620 күн бұрын
"And remember, if the allies can't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." (Apologies to The Red Green Show) Keep in mind had he been born in Ukraine a few decades later, he'd probably be a leader in their long-range drone program. He had the right idea at the wrong time, because he was trying to lift an unnecessary amount of armor. I had an uncle like that who finished building a homebuilt despite having a stroke that left him half-paralyzed and unable to fly it. It took over a decade and a lot of garage mechanic cleverness. It was flyable despite various parts from Walmart used in its construction.
@cascadianrangers728Ай бұрын
I like the idea of trying to outnumber the Soviets, I don't think I have ever heard anyone propose that ever before, everyone has always assumed the Soviets would have overwhelming numerical superiority and it's interesting to hear someone brave enough to propose outnumbering them!
@daispy10121 күн бұрын
You should really do a video on the New Zealand man who built his own cruise missile using a pulse jet.
@jeffstrom164Ай бұрын
Lots of people revolutionized weapins in thier backyard, its pretty common, including plane design.
@joejoejoejoejoejoe4391Ай бұрын
I would have thought the wings on race cars would be a good starting point, as they have a lot of development behind them, and are designed to create a lot of force from a small size.
@brianb-p6586Ай бұрын
Automotive racing wings are not efficient enough for aircraft. They are developed for a different application with different conditions and goals.
@MrEthan100Ай бұрын
Please do an episode on out-of-place artifacts that have been excluded from archaeological reports!!!
@cameronhermann940029 күн бұрын
I wonder what this guy would think about the Megaprojects video you released a couple weeks ago. The one about the special forces propeller aircraft being used, cheaper then jets. Bet Bob would have loved it
@danor6812Ай бұрын
Imagin buying one of his restored planes. Then when you need to repair something, you can't call a mechanic because you need a plumber.
@PlaneSaddles29 күн бұрын
So since the movie Battle of Britain and the Commemorative Airforce was mentioned (they need a video as well), might I recommend video on Connie Edwards. BTW the CAF wouldn't have been HQ'd in Dallas during the years mentioned.
@dreddfan01Ай бұрын
10:19 'the confederate airforce were looking for planes' 😂 Damn, the civil war is still in full swing! I know it was just a verbal slip up but it was hilarious
@andrewmcalister3462Ай бұрын
The Confederate Air Force is actually a thing - an organisation restoring and flying old war birds. In 2000, it renamed itself the Commerorative Air Force.
@cpfs936Ай бұрын
I knew of a guy who had a small plane in his garage, but the wings were removable.
@DragonArcadiaАй бұрын
The sad part is a lot of replacements being looked at for the A-10, probably the best attacker ever made, are prop planes that use the same low and slow logic Bob had with the Defender. If he was able to get proper funding, he might have actually had something considering how far he got while improvising the whole way.
@Robert-gs6crАй бұрын
The problem with government funding is the beaurocracy and their need for control without knowledge
@DragonArcadiaАй бұрын
@ I agree. I know what I said is more of an ideal situation that probably would’ve never happened. It’s just neat to think what could’ve been if he had the money and access to things like a proper wind tunnel.
@ThatTieDyeGuy15 күн бұрын
This was great, since you guys are doing canadians, could you do one of these for Troy Hurtbois, the Bear Suit and Firepaste Inventor.