The 2018 Omega Railmaster Wristwatch: A Quick Shabazz Review

[@citrusforce]

I LOVE the fact that it doesn't have a date on it.

[@VampireParrot]

I wear exactly that watch in a railway signal box - and I often need to be able to glance at my watch for maybe half a second and know the time. The readability of the Railmaster is superb; as good as any other watch and better than 95 % of all watches. I haven't yet had a problem reading the time at a glance, so I really don't understand your concerns about readability, certainly in a real-world situation. It's an excellent design. So for my job, signalling trains in a signal box which has equipment from the early to mid 1900s - it's pretty near perfect 🙂

[@eagle112800]

I love that there is no date on this thing.

[@zunedog31]

I looked this up just yesterday and was annoyed by the lack of videos on this watch. I think it's a real sleeper. Thanks for the vid.

[@josefw9253]

This watch is gorgeous! The minute I can afford this I'm buying it.

[@DrFrankLondon]

Love the Old Radium Superluminova Omega is using. Great looking watch...

[@RondelayAOK]

This is the one luxury watch I'd consider buying. Looks superb!

[@tantu2395]

This is a watch that suits everyday wearing , casual or formal, with that no day, and date, or GMT display means it's a perfect man's jewelry seen as a bracelet that telling time.

[@jimboutilier7552]

I share your peeve about quick adjust clasps. They can add a bit of cost and bulk, but are so worth it to most folks that have experienced one. It's particularly puzzling when manufacturers have it on a few models but not many models in a given price range. As good as some Omega bracelets are without a quick adjust, they would be that much better with one.

[@NickShabazz]

One other note which I forgot to mention in the video: The Seamaster Professional 300 is actually cheaper than this guy, at $4400. Given, they're very different watches, but still, Omega, what the heck?

[@markalexander774]

Mechanical > Quartz. The difference between an Omega Quartz movement and a cheap, Chinese made Quartz movement is not all that much in terms of what it is. Whereas Omega mechanical movements are a lot more special in terms of craftsmanship and design than a cheap Seagull or Miyota movement.

[@tomjsmith000]

Both watches are mechanical.

[@markalexander774]

No, they are not. Look at 0:55 when he pulls the Seamaster Professional 300 out: The seconds hand does not move that slow on any mechanical watch, that is a quartz watch tick. The Planet Ocean that he has is mechanical, but that is not what he mentioned in the comment and nor is it cheaper than the Railmaster.

[@tomjsmith000]

markalexander774 the railmaster literally says co-axial on the dial. That’s an automatic movement.

[@markalexander774]

At no point in any comment that I have ever written did I say nor imply that the Railmaster was Quartz, if you had bothered to actually read my comments you would have clearly seen that I was referring to the Seamaster Professional as the Quartz one. I don't even know why I'm writing this because you clearly will either not read this and/or won't understand it given your limited mental capacity.

[@dutzumiho9449]

Nick you’re crushing it with the watch reviews. Keep’em coming!

[@smeefbeef367]

“A Quick Shabazz Review” *Is 20 minutes*

[@NickShabazz]

#NotAConciseMan

[@WidleyWesident]

Quick? 20 minutes? Only took me 2 minutes to decide to buy one. Nice watch, lots of sharp edges, became more accurate after about 18 months. Wears just as easily as my Milgauss. If there was a next time I’d buy the 39mm limited edition.

[@mannycalavera2335]

Edit: Went to the AD.... thought more about the movement and the way the watch looks.... planning to buy one now lol. Did not expect it. This watch wasn't very well received but in person it is something distinct and strangely captivating. My personal association of the watch is vacation, fall, adventure. I don't know... I love it.....

[@0rcface]

The color of the dial, along with the brushing sort of looks like wood grain. Nice.

[@paulx7620]

That loom is very surprising bright and I thought it would be yellowish but it's that nice green. Thanks Nick.

[@sinjon]

The indices are actually a plate behind the dial. I believe it’s called a gilt-relief dial

[@neilwade9870]

Nice watch and nicely reviewed. Love the way you keep referring to this little guy. 👍

[@xDarkPrototypex]

This review was done MASTERfully. It was of the RAILs.

[@marcocastagnetti7086]

It's amazing that people fail to realise why this watch has a flat dial, In the review it stated no applied indesies for the money you will find that applied indesies would ruin the aesthetics of the watch and feel that omega is trying to produce plus it's link to the previous models of years gone buy.

[@MobiuSphere]

Only Nick can do a 20 minute "quick" review. I hate to see how long a full review would take!

[@xDarkPrototypex]

MobiuSphere It would be a 20 hour marathon, discussing the finish and function of every gear seperately, finished off with a full overview of all Omega watches AND the history of the company.

[@ianwoollard2063]

MobiuSphere you have to admit though that Nick talks pretty fast so you’re probably getting 40 minutes worth

[@garyadels1]

I had a good laugh with his description. In the matter of a few seconds, he used the word “custardy” three times and “custard” twice to describe the lume. I think the lume color is perfect, by the way.

[@Ben-yw8be]

Underrated.

[@jigunawa]

Dude love the puns at the end of the review. The first one got me chuckled and the next one got me burst out laughing. I agreed with most of what you said however the major factor when purchasing high-end luxury items (be it watch, clothes or bags) it comes to a matter of heart, not head. The head is screaming “GET A FREAKING GRIP!!! PAINTED DIALS, NO DATE!!!!!! YOU CAN DO BETTER!!!!!” But the heart says “however, its a nifty looking watch... looks great on your wrist...... get it.... get it..... get it..... you know you want it..... get it....”

[@budaflash]

I think it's great value compared to the Rolex milgauss and the IWC Ingeniur. You can find them now for under 4k

[@Keith_the_knife_freak]

NICK.. Do not get me into watches!!!

[@neilwade9870]

I love your style of presentation and also this watch. Just not sure if the black or silver dial is the one for me.

[@Mixali88]

“Just here to tell the time, sir” hahaha. Great review now this is on my list.

[@spyhunter6411]

The railmaster and the Rolex explorer have been catching my eye lately.

[@spyhunter6411]

@@Tony-qb2ed a 9lb 22 inch healthy baby boy instead haha.

[@spyhunter6411]

@@Tony-qb2ed oof, I think if I had to choose right now today, AND price isn't an object, I'd choose the explorer. But that's today. I really like them both.

[@mikec3454]

This watch is not thick lol ... anything under 13mm these days is drooled over. The Railmaster is definitely on my short list of contenders for my next watch, looking to get an Omega back into the watch box. I still have to check one out in the flesh though to be convinced. I really liked the broad arrow hands on my previous Railmaster (ref 2503), still getting used to the baton hands on this one. I'm really like how Omega fully brushed this one, too much polish this day in age in watches. This is a watch for a true watch enthusiast who doesn't care if others notice it.

[@tonyr669]

First of all the indices are recessed not painted. But I have an idea let’s load everything that’s on the aqua terra onto this watch and raise the price $2000 would that make you happy?

[@floridaman727]

About to pick one up before their all gone

[@jimboutilier7552]

Isn't it funny how most of the new vintage inspired pieces share a really inexpensive "flat" dial finish, but the prices are not so vintage. ;-)

[@Leftystrat]

Spring drive in the new model marinemaster coming? Then I’ll be buying one😊

[@pegauracheii]

This is an outstanding review. You have a very realistic insight, as usual. I don't have enough thumbs to put up for this video and your channel.

[@kamlapati]

You praise the dial for it's simplicity, then ding it for the lack of applied anything. As chess players say "your strength is your weakness."

[@dzod9574]

Nick, Have you seen the pics of the new seamaster pro 300. What are your thoughts on the refresh. Trying to decide if I should buy current model or wait for the new one to be available.

[@NickShabazz]

The newer one is bigger and thicker, but a slightly nicer movement. I'm tempted by it, but want to see the waves in person.

[@dzod9574]

I agree. I was all ready to buy the current version then saw the press release on the new one. It does fee a bit busy compared to the outgoing version. I may wait to see it in person as well.

[@ChrisInJersey]

I agree with the better movement but come on, it's 2018 and the "new" movement still beats at 25,500. I personally think the new Basel models are as ugly as sin. I much prefer either the ceramic or old school Brosnan. But hey, buy what you like, wear it in good health and enjoy the heck out of it.

[@WolfKeeper32]

I love the dial on this

[@eliakuiper4266]

"if it had a date I'd be asking myself some awkward questions right now" 😆 nice puns too

[@Xanduur]

I was like, "Okay, I watch the video." with ho hum excitement. Then I heard your voice yelled, "Awesome, its Nick!!!"

[@herbalnedtv]

FYI, Nick, they don't have any listed on the website as of 4/3...

[@tonycanniffe2360]

Ever had a look at the Seiko Alpinist Nick?

[@patrickmacleod2415]

I disagree that it is overpriced vs. a Rolex. This watch is more magnetic resistant than a Milgauss, META certified, greater depth rating, and yet with discount available at any Omega AD, it is easily 2K less than an Explorer, and 4K less than a Milgauss. Regarding lack of indices and lack of date- that is by design to be more of a tool watch and more vintage inspired. Clearly this watch is for those who want a simple and reliable tool watch without a lot of flash. If you want polished indices and flash, get an Aqua Terra, or a a modern Explorer or Milgauss. If you want a movement that has not met as stringent of standards as a Master Chronometer or Superlative Chronometer, then pay a little bit less and get a Tudor. Omega's pricing fits nicely between the two, and makes sense. Now if you want to argue that all luxury watches are overpriced, then I won't debate you on that, but Omega and specifically this Railmaster is not overpriced compared to the rest of the market.

[@NickShabazz]

Yes, but look at loss of value. Buy a Rolex explorer, you'll lose a grand max. Buy one of these retail, and poof.

[@patrickmacleod2415]

That's always the argument for Rolex, "But what about resale?" You could say this about any luxury watch that isn't Rolex then. I could understand if the prices were close, but as I mentioned, this Omega is 2 to 4K less than comparative Rolexes, even if you paid full retail for the Omega. As you mentioned in your review, buyers should ask their ADs for a discount. Omega ADs tend to give decent discounts. I have already know two people who sold this very watch and they each lost less than 1K (after buying at discount). But my point was not about resale value, but comparative value in the market place. Omega in general, and this watch specifically, is significantly less expensive than comparative Rolex watches, so it really doesn't make sense to cite the cost compared to Rolex as a negative. And I'm talking about "comparative" watches were Omega actually has the technical advantage- better water resistance, better magnetic resistance, more stringent METAS chronometer testing. By the way, my Railmaster is +1 second after two weeks.

[@NickShabazz]

Absolutely, it's a relative value. But it's still relatively overpriced. I feel like what they're delivering shouldn't be as expensive as it is :)

[@MadsGormLarsen]

Hi Nick - what is your wrist size?

[@eljayr4669]

This watch was on my shortlist until I saw a blue dial Rolex Oyster Perpetual for just a few bucks more. I bought the Rolex. A fabulous watch that gives me one second a day.

[@louismeluso8633]

Love the looks of the new RM but agree, should have applied markers, logo, something!

[@jimboutilier7552]

Great review as always. You did not mention it, but did you get a feel for the watches timing over you review period? Even knowing there was no perceptible loss or gain over the few days you've had it could be helpful.

[@NickShabazz]

During the 24 hours or so, it was running +3, but I don't know what it'd be like on the wrist.

[@jimboutilier7552]

I understand that the factory accuracy rating is calculated by periods of time in 5 or 6 positions and averaged, and that one user of a watch can experience a fairly significant deviation from the testing or even another user. But even the type of observation you just provide is quite useful to gauge how close to the spec might be likely in a given unit. I've purchased luxury watches that were definitely not in spec and it's always interesting to see the experiences of others.

[@ianwoollard2063]

It’s a good quality watch and I’m a big fan of the Planet Ocean. What I’m not crazy about is the industrial vintage design. The brushed dial doesn’t do anything for me and the colour of the stainless steel is very dull looking. As good as it is quality wise I find it unexciting style wise. Good review Nick but I love your Planet Ocean too much to pop for a Railmaster

[@atifch84]

Anyone know if this Railmaster bracelet will fit a regular Speedmaster Pro?

[@JogBird]

omega movements are way too thick

[@ViceCommando]

Check out the dress watches. Like DeVille Prestige.

[@rhahnabunaid]

Nick, just wondering, have you ever owned or held a Bvlgari? I've been drooling over the Bvlgari Bvlgari Chronograph lately, but $7000 ....

[@NickShabazz]

They're nicely done, and have some serious horological cred on the higher end, but that's a LOT of money.

[@americanmight5067]

Hey nick, I’m in metro Detroit as well do you know of any decent knife stores in the area? Most of the places I’ve been are just selling kershaws and other cheap stuff. Thanks for all the great content!

[@harvardford8752]

I love this watch so much, much much more than the seamaster and the speed master Though I’d rather get the rail master chronograph Or why not both haha.

[@elv3a424]

It still doesn't beat the speedmaster in my opinion

[@theguardian3431]

That was a very insightful review, sir! Pros, cons, and everything in between. Love your thoughts on the watch.

[@0rcface]

Nick, have you ever considered a Grand Seiko? Knowing your appreciation for both quartz and mechanical movements, I imagine the Spring Drive tech would appeal to you. It really is cool.

[@0rcface]

XD. Okay. I just checked and you have reviewed a Grand Seiko. Silly me.

[@Mister_Phafanapolis]

Breathe. Relax. Slow down. Take a moment, Nick. You're nervous as fuck.

[@jcktimeless9277]

Beautuful watch!

[@cloudcleaver23]

You should review the Seiko equivalent(s) to the Casio Oceanus.

[@miabeatz80]

I get that these reviews can't only have the positives. However to compare this against a Rolex Explorer 1 is a reach. Try getting the explorer at retail. This is a larger watch secondly and with arguably a slightly better movement. There are many great butterfly clasps without fine adjustment look at the Nautilus. When did quick adjust become the standard for a watch costing 5k? IMO some watches just look more proportionate without a date and this is one of them especially as a tool watch. It's hard to argue with all the positives here and the pre owned deals on this are great as well. At 12.7mm thin that's slimmer than the new speedy.

[@jmartin2778]

Omega's answer to the Rolex Explorer. Minus the applied hours, adjustable bracelet, and long-term value retention.

[@mountman5386]

And the option of the Explorer 2 & lume that actually orientates the watch face. The Omega's lume is too symetrical, it would always bug me.

[@jarrodlee1506]

Get the explorer or pre owned explorer 2 40mm.done

[@miabeatz80]

The same can be said and worse about the Pelagos with bigger losses and much cheaper build quality. I understand if you buy watches for value retention but the price of entry negates the argument. Spending double to gain value retention then everyone would drive Lexus SUV instead of Range Rover. Sometimes a watch that flies under the radar is a good thing.

[@amypeterson4615]

The one thing I don't like are the 4 arabics; they seem to be an after thought. Probably would have been best to just leave them off the dial.

[@Oneillw]

Hey Nick I think we’ll ever see your review of the Rolex GMT

[@justinbjork5682]

Just have to say it… you sound like Filbert from Rocko’s Modern Life. It’s hilarious. 😅

[@cctvspystore]

I bought one of the 1st Timex Indiglo watches back in the day

[@ElusiveMasquerade]

The lume looks to me like faded radium

[@vvvhhhhhbb]

Muppet! Blows away the Milgauss. 15k Gauss compared to 1k Gauss. And can actually buy one.

[@shahorology3275]

Great watch.

[@Ragnar215]

His voice is great it sounds old school New York or south Philly

[@buzzufy]

Really beautiful timepiece + :)

[@thijscasco4071]

Nick, were you wearing your Batman mask again?

[@thomash4578]

You're not wearing yours?

[@guyvanburen]

Prefer the matte black and no faux-tina lume of the 2504.52.00

[@jackstein1171]

Nick; I love Omega AND lume . Tritum is still the best None available on my Omega or Rollex .

[@marcdee4427]

I love omega 👍🏻

[@alainl1211]

Just for the record....It will not fly off of your wrist in an MRI...

[@frank.l181]

Omega is a very solid investment . The movement is as good as rolex datejust 41mm but way less money!

[@evh4611]

No micro adjustment on the clasp sucks balls

[@ck23j]

Awesome review

[@edrader104]

great looking watch but not a fan of "aged" lume and price is rolexish. got my in-house pelagos for $3350 from authorized dealer.

[@ricktemmen6272]

Great video with some nice puns at the end lol ...

[@DannyTurk]

I thought this guy was about to say just get the railmasta, and foget abou it. Batabing bataboom.

[@MrBacchus18]

Lot's of Omega love

[@AlfredoRGuillen]

One is paying a very high price for the co-axial technology...great invetion but should be less expensive now as it has been arround for a while. Now, I love Omegas but the Planet Ocean or any of the Seamasters look way much better as high end watches......this watch honestly is stuck in the middle....it is definitively not targeting the jewlery market but has an extremely high price....it looks cheap and brushed watches are way much difficult to restore to its original looks when scratches appear as jewlers need to use the exact brush to restore damage othewise patched brushed sections are noticeable....anyway, very good review!

[@patrickmacleod2415]

It's not difficult for restore brushing at all for anyone who knows that they are doing. It's not just coaxial that you are paying for, but completely anti-magnetic and META certification for accuracy and durability. Mine is +1 seconds after two weeks and it is more magnetic resistant than a Milgaus.

[@ardbeg9143]

Patrick MacLeod but the new Seamaster professional has all those things and it's cheap

[@ardbeg9143]

Less expensive*

[@PalmuserSavage]

Splendid! I never like watches with date on it.

[@67tagada]

Bien meilleure qu'une Explorer techniquement, mais surtout moins chère !

[@Rhunzzz]

Ye Gods, the puns were a trainwreck

[@mo_viking7075]

That ones gonna get left at the station alot.

[@mikaxms]

Ah, Michigan. I recognize the accent from maffia movies XD

[@mauiharward4748]

I’m NOT GETTING INTO WATCHED! you’re a watch demon for trying. Shame on you Nick Shabazz.

[@pitiedvod]

Gets told this a quick look... 20 minutes later.

[@yehoshuacirt8645]

From what I've read, Omega doesn't claim anymore longer servicing intervals with the coaxial, and others say that it doesn't matter as far as increased accuracy is concerned. No tangible advantage. So people talk of Omega's innovation in incorporating the movement. Why would I want a coaxia, then? It's a gimmick, no?

[@coconutmango9519]

It was a hook and bait in the beginning to make people buy their watch. Now they want to make money off regular service.

[@hwarangi77]

Dad jokes for the win!

[@dr.killjoy29]

I need a ball Watch review

[@T3L3cast3r]

Your reviews are really worth the watch! (see what I did there....)

[@bolajishobaloju7302]

2 years poster someone has seen what you did 🤣🤣🤣

[@MetalsForBrunch]

Not a fan of faux patina hands. Watch is okay.

[@markalexander774]

I don't like the completely flat dial, it's off putting and seems kind of cheap for a very expensive watch, it just doesn't look nice, which is a shame because the overall design concept is definitely good. It's also way too expensive for what it is. I do like that it doesn't have a hideous date feature like so many watches today do: My two biggest pet peeves for watch dials are date features that cut a hole in the dial (ones that use hands are perfectly fine) and when numbers are cutoff (usually by chronograph subdials), either put the entire goddamn number or don't put any of it, I don't want to see half of a six.

[@abdelrauf1408]

Why do you sound like a gangster from 50’s? 🤣

[@johneli495]

Because he's a vintage inspired sort of person

[@abdelrauf1408]

@Mira culix LOL 🤣

[@kerryrwac]

Why is a date window so important to you ?

[@NickShabazz]

Because I don't know the date without it.

[@thomash4578]

@@kerryrwacthe date not the day of the week

[@JohnSmith-so6to]

I like having the day and date, but I like the symmetrical look of watches that don’t have it.

[@giangvu7902]

Hahaha your reviews are funny. Love it! Yeah Omega is asking slot of money for this watch.

[@WuBloodKin09]

Great review, but the watch looks cheap asf...I’ll pass!

[@MrJintensive]

I'd buy that for a dollar.

[@tomasinacovell4293]

Now only if they'd had called it the "Ranchero", used regular white lume, and made it 38mm as a sapphire sandwich. I would have to kill for it then.