The 2024 Chevrolet Traverse Z71 Is A Spacious & Capable 3-Row Family SUV With Truck Vibes

[@eddieherron7335]

Just bought one and we love it.

[@KhrissyDaDon]

I remember when a young Sofyan did a review on the second generation Traverse, can’t believe how time is flying 😭!!

[@jhr5280]

agreed

[@cassjr17]

You and Ratis Rides are the only ones i listen to when it comes to reviews

[@Leebs]

The first company that puts minivan sliding doors on a giant suv like this will sell 10 million

[@dennwilliams3342]

Uh, it’s called a carnival 🤷🏾‍♂️🤣

[@Dankcatvacs]

@@dennwilliams3342 forgot

[@chibbyylol]

Toyota Century SUV lol

[@crvilca1]

Literally just told my wife that lol. Anything to avoid the minivan stigma

[@KNRS927]

@@crvilca1I’ve never understood why the minivan stigma even exists. At this rate, is there gonna be a 3 row SUV stigma because they’re basically becoming that “soccer parent” car even though they’re worse in every way compared to a minivan. This traverse is basically a minivan without the sliding doors, and even then it isn’t as practical as the well isn’t as deep, and seats don’t fold into it.

[@thegraggs]

So the 2023 Traverse with a V6 and AWD got 25 mpg on the highway vs this turbo 4 getting 24. The V6 ran 0-60 in 6.8 vs this turbo 4 doing 7.45. And the V6 won’t have turbo related problems. No thanks GM!

[@KNRS927]

You can thank emissions standards. That’s why automakers are downsizing engines, not for fuel economy.

[@thegraggs]

@@KNRS927 but pushing the 4 cylinder to perform similarly will just increase the emissions

[@KNRS927]

@@thegraggs it doesn’t.

[@Michael-li3id]

don't forget the turbo 4 needs premium fuel!

[@thegraggs]

@@Michael-li3id exactly. It’s a definite no on this GM.

[@NativeDay05]

We custom ordered our Z71 Traverse and we got a call from GM a couple of weeks ago that the manufacturer of the panoramic sunroof didn't meet the order demands and under produced so they are no longer available on the 2024. They will have it available on the 2025 but that will also be a long wait to get those produced as well as they are behind on production. We were really bummed as we wanted the sunroof but it's not a necessity that we needed but again really frustrated that we could not get that option added to our Traverse.

[@polarsled417]

Just search for one with what you want. I found many with the panoramic sunroof.

[@NativeDay05]

@@polarsled417 Its a complicated story but we got our car for MSRP and tax free through our local dealership so I can't really get any better deal anywhere else.

[@Billn1971]

When the panoramic roof starts leaking, it is very expensive to fix or replace. ( expect $2500. or more ) If you keep a vehicle for a few yrs... you are better off without the panoramic roof. Or find a model with a standard size moonroof. When those seals fade it's cheap to replace. Less than $100.

[@dailycruise8550]

The headrests not folding down is a common problem with these right now. Almost everyone is having the issue and the fix is on backorder through GM.

[@lucasokeefe7935]

"A 1mpg improvement over the old V6" but way more expensive, will last half as long and sell ALL of your driving and personal data to literally anyone who offers for the rest of eternity.

[@RemX405]

Car is as heavy, if not heavier than the old one, so of course moving that much mass takes the same amount of energy, hence similar MPG. By the way, downsizing is mostly for emissions, not for better MPG. People tend to confuse the two. Turbo engines have a more "complete/efficient/clean" combustion, which leads to less emissions.

[@truraza]

@@RemX405 And many moving parts...

[@DeadAir21]

The change to the turbo engine wasn’t for fuel efficiency, but for better emissions.

[@midengineZ06]

That 3.6L V6 is known by mechanics as a bread maker. It's a matter of when it's going to break. Hopefully this engine will better

[@mattspeer01]

@@midengineZ06 This is GM we are talking about, they don't build anything "better" or more reliable, just unreliable junk decade after decade.

[@karley1548]

Just bought an LT. Put on 500 miles. Love it in every way.

[@davis6123]

High Country is coming next year. I suspect they’re hoping buyers who want a more premium feel will go to the Acadia/Enclave

[@justindelguerico4674]

Can still get a v6 in the Honda Pilot

[@canadabear72]

The Korean twins as well. Not many V6's left. :(

[@justindelguerico4674]

@@canadabear72 Ford Explorer if you go for the upper trims still offer a v6

[@dennwilliams3342]

@@justindelguerico4674I didn’t know that. They love that 2.3 ecoboost

[@dennwilliams3342]

But the pilot is the only SUV with under 290 hp that offers V6

[@phantom0456]

@@justindelguerico4674yes, but it’s twin turbo, not naturally aspirated.

[@Unknownevanuser]

Remember when 4 cylinders were base engines?

[@joshualewis2367]

Yea I remember that and was really only on inexpensive cars

[@G-Rated]

Back when they were making 200 hp, but you conveniently left that part out *of course.*

[@naywahn]

Pepperidge Farm remembers...

[@dustinm8800]

I think it's our government putting themselves in EVERYTHING we go. Hate it

[@Jenna_]

Remember when it required a 5.0+ V8 to produce this much power, less torque, is always going to be less efficient, more expensive to own, and a lot worse for people and the environment?

[@JogBird]

cool but not $55k cool

[@VaunShiz]

Yea it's gonna be part of the rental car fleet , I had a 2023 as a rental ... 55k for a tarted up rental is a no go

[@VaunShiz]

Had a 2023 as a rental for 2 weeks , very good car, losing the reliable 3.6L to a 4cyl turbo for basically the same mpg is dumb

[@sprague49]

Dumb yes, but blame Washington, not Detroit. The 3.6L is a 20 year old proven design but ever tightening government regulations stamp a sell by date on engines. Bureaucrats don't care about reliability, BTW.

[@andersonrodriguez8258]

Emission I guess the 4 cylinder “polute” less

[@tescoshortage]

Whenever you search “3.6L GM V6” on KZbin, the top search recommendation is “3.6L GM V6 timing chain replacement”. That should tell you that these were _not_ reliable engines. Not that this new engine is going to be any less shitty, but it’s insane for people to be turning around on that paperweight of a motor. And before someone goes “well, I have a traverse 3.6 with 200k and it runs just fine!” I know. I drove a Malibu with that engine and 250k miles in driving school. Even the shittiest engines can’t avoid survivorship bias.

[@J-W.-]

I guess have to add in overall drivability. Most people buying these don’t want to be flooring an engine to get power. I agree it’s sad we lost V6 but GM gonna do what they gotta do.

[@KNRS927]

Automakers are going to 4 cylinders for emissions, not fuel economy. Also, those V6 engines were notorious for timing chain failures between 50-100k, and other issues too. Just because it’s a “big V6” doesn’t mean it’s bulletproof and reliable. Not all naturally aspirated engines are created equal.

[@ty-mn6ij]

That color is damn gorgeous! I mean, WOW

[@KNRS927]

GM has been on a roll in terms of interior and exterior looks. I’ve never trusted GM reliability in general on anything that isn’t a truck though, so I’d probably pass. However, GM is making nicer interiors and better looking cars, so I’ll give them props. I’d love to see a comments section where an SUV gets redesigned, its downsizing to 4 cylinder, and folks aren’t just complaining in comments all day as if the sales are gonna be affected . And sales are what matter EOD for a carmaker.

[@Natethegreat200c]

Well I wish I could see a comment section where people don’t complain about “bad reliability “ or “not trusting a GM car”. It’s annoying and you don’t have a reason to not trust it. Just a Toyota apologist

[@KNRS927]

@@Natethegreat200c I mean there’s a reason Toyota, Honda, Subaru and Japanese automakers top reliability studies every year, especially from outlets like Consumer Reports. Meanwhile, GM brands usually are at the bottom half of those lists. The moment I see a reliability list from an outlet like CR and it has Chevy/GMC/Cadillac in the top 5-10 and for multiple years in a row, let me know. Also I won’t forget the time when they gave me a Chevy equinox as a rental for a week. I absolute loathed that car.

[@rickstraws92]

@@KNRS927 EXACTLY

[@BCdgz]

Nothing beats a naturally aspirated V6 in durability, reliability, low maintenance and smoothness. And I'm skeptical about the durability of turbo engines in the long run The auto industry is going the wrong way

[@bryanharris2319]

Blame the epa

[@jcollins1305]

Unelected bureaucrats

[@polarsled417]

This V6 was not reliable, that was part of the problem.

[@lmalmeida]

Just bought one 2024 Chevrolet Traverse 2 weeks ago. It is a nice car but Lane Assist does not work. Media Center does no allow you to select music while driving or search music by Folder. Overall I regreat that I do not bough a VW Atlas which has more technology and space.

[@111danish111]

A high country is in the works.

[@ksolius1906]

still not V6 though

[@rcDoom]

Low country, High price

[@polarsled417]

@@rcDoom I'd rather pay 55k for this than 85k for the Tahoe

[@pouyamohammadi8133]

I like the fact there were more information at the end about the car.

[@josephs1701]

I think Soyfan really likes the word “vibes”

[@HoosierPete69.]

The engine gives me flashbacks of the quad 4 engine that was new in the Pontiac lineup. GM used Pontiac as the guinea pig like they are with this engine in the traverse.

[@anothey93]

That paint, exterior styling, and infotainment/cluster setup is all excellent! A higher powered engine option would be awesome to see..maybe one day they'll make a quicker one.

[@aryehrosenthal2138]

The wiper switch reminds me of the old Chevy vehicles from the 2000's which is on the left instead of on the right.

[@sanktheboat]

They need to make a real Blazer based on the Colorado / Canyon to compete with Jeeps, Broncos, and 4Runners.

[@Natethegreat200c]

4 runner can’t compete with Jeep. The 4 runner has an independent front suspension along with the ford. They compete with each other but not the Jeep.

[@Ara198826]

so made it 4 cylinder added a turbo charger (way less reliable ) about the same speed for 1 mpg improvement if you are not too heavy on the throttle ?

[@VaunShiz]

Yea turbo 4s are less efficient when on throttle especially in he wy cars like this ... That 1 mph is only gonna be seen on level ground and doing the speed limit

[@JAStewart2]

7:30. Known issue. The head restraints are getting stuck in the UP position.

[@IOSALive]

Redline Reviews, awesome content bro

[@mikeburton8426]

that accent in the rear quarter window is straight out of the Kia! Maybe that will become the new default replacing the over used attempts at floating roof design

[@SonyaGayle]

kislux versace bag is so cute

[@ChrisINRL]

13:12 was that gesture control???

[@jstnnn1]

the screens are becoming a bit excessive. the actual carplay probably doesn’t even take up more than 15”. just something else to worry about in the future.

[@esaireyna899]

The exterior color looks like the paint they use for a Paul Reed Smith guitar tbh

[@Dillingham-]

Also looks like lingerie. I guess that's not terrible 😄

[@JazzyChef]

I love this color.

[@skylermchale6462]

I will say it looks a lot like a Durango that’s been out for yearssss but it does look really good

[@Bigern2998]

I like it. I can't believe I am saying that.......never been a chevy guy....

[@charlesyoung9980]

The only one more spacious and capable than the 2024 Chevrolet Traverse Z71 is Sofyan!!

[@SimonGonzalOS]

Wait...whuuuu

[@6ec6YRFPTcC]

I just read that for 2025, the LS Trim is canceled, and the High Country is returning

[@SimonGonzalOS]

Dang everybody trying to come out with colors like the Lexus Rose Gold! This color looks pretty good on this But these 4 cylinders are a nope. People gotta stop buying them and show these companies they aren't acceptable

[@dtay8913]

It's not about "buying them and show the companies they aren't acceptable" it's about the federal government overstepping it's boundaries and forcing these companies to make more "fuel efficient" options.

[@davis6123]

Even Toyota/Lexus have moved to four cylinders in their three row crossovers. Unfortunately this is the future

[@SimonGonzalOS]

@@davis6123 outside of the hybrid variants, they suck

[@SimonGonzalOS]

@@dtay8913 I'm sure if people quit buying the 4 cylinders the government is gonna cave like how they did with the border. Less money means these companies gonna be looking for bailouts for the governments enforcements.

[@jraheemjefcoat429]

BLAME THE GOVERNMENT!

[@md8744]

Damn. Been waiting for this on your review only.

[@HALWG51]

The Z71 packages are always mid level. Not all the bells and whistles

[@1994jesusdiaz]

Did they discontinue this color? Or did they change the name to Harvest Bronze metallic?

[@HiiImChris]

Hmm I've noticed something this last year. It feels like auto manufacturers are applying one interior to essentially every model. There's not much differentiation between models, it makes a vehicle feel a little less unique and takes away some of the charm of different models. If it helps keep models affordable im all for it, but audi is a huge example, the a6 look exactly like the a7 and a8 interior wise

[@JLC-zg5rd]

Honda is bad about using the same interior and dashboard - hopefully they do not do that on the new Passport and Ridgeline coming out this next year

[@bgmarksu]

The straps needed a bit more tug to fold down the headrests

[@theuniverseconnection]

It’s actually a problem GM is having with the traverse.

[@Maxwell1989]

You forgot to mention automatic parking included in the super cruise package

[@labradachig1976]

Great review! This or the Grand Highlander? Which one feels "smaller" when driving?

[@theredline]

That’s a good question, they feel pretty similar, but the Traverse feels a little bit wider on the road. Grand Highlander feels like you’re piloting a minivan, while the Traverse Z71 feels more like a Tahoe. Both are still easy to drive and feel spacious. We prefer the powertrain refinement in the Toyota though, plus the availability of hybrids make it the fuel economy leader. The Chevy looks better on the outside in our eyes and has a larger infotainment screen though.

[@naveenthemachine]

Traverse by far. It’s roomier better to drive and better in tech and materials and design.

[@goulartaf66]

Not sure why GM just didn't build a proper blazer with a full box frame.

[@lilred1107]

There's no market for that, it isn't 1987.

[@smittysmitty481]

Nice review & nice SUV!

[@guillevit]

Sick color 👍🏼

[@cecekeepingitreal3531]

They need to do something about these transmissions

[@theuniverseconnection]

Test drove it, didn’t like how the engine sounds like it’s coming out of the hood. GM is having lots of problems, including the headrest not folding and preventing the third row to fold.

[@slimtny]

If Chevy dealers actually offered customer service, i wouldn't mind taking a chance on this.

[@JLC-zg5rd]

I will say even though i have had mechanical issues with my 22 Canyon with only 24,000 miles on it - enough problems that i contacted GM cooperate and i will say they actually acted like they cared and were very helpful compared to 14 years when i had Chevy with many issues they didnt seem to care back then

[@dustinm8800]

I'm bummed about losing the v6

[@naveenthemachine]

This looks great. This the telluride palisade are best in class but the Korean twins eek out a slight win

[@obedjimenez4229]

Korean twins “best in class” in what?

[@naveenthemachine]

@@obedjimenez4229 everything. From design to interior to tech to materials to features to space to driving / ride balance. They punch way above their weight for the class

[@TheBjjones]

Nope. The newly released Traverse, Acadia & Enclave are new class leaders based on overall cargo room & standard features plus the Telluride/Palisade doesn't offer any hands free driving technology like GM Super Cruise.

[@jraheemjefcoat429]

​@@TheBjjonesWait until the 2026 redesign on both 2026 Palisade and Telluride next year.

[@TheBjjones]

@@jraheemjefcoat429 Looking forward to it.

[@thomasmiller2395]

Great looking vehicle, but really disappointed w the 4 cyl. Makes vehicles this size and weight seem much less substantial, hearing a 4cyl trying to move this mass around.

[@andersonrodriguez8258]

Exactly gonna b overworked

[@JLC-zg5rd]

I like the fact Honda is keeping their reliable and strong running V6

[@willileo2373]

Are you sure 4 Cylinder 2.5L turbo is enough to move such beast?!

[@cfrank925]

It’s pretty fast. I test drove one. Lots of torque. Looking at buying one in a few months.

[@darkismkayla]

For a long time, as the price of Chanel increased, I no longer thought I could afford it. I think I'll be happy that I have the kislux as my travel bag that I don't have to take care of. By the way, I'm sure no one will have a hard time telling the difference. Thanks for the comparison.

[@DiroPhoenixFan]

This color is beautiful❤ unfortunately the third row is not big enough 😔

[@leibstandarte0]

Does the Z71 ride smoother than the RS?

[@williampolinchak]

Does that thing have a brake hold feature?

[@Maxwell1989]

No it doesn't The all new Buick enclave includes it

[@vladrazym9955]

What's the price for the base version?

[@ATRichard]

Nice ride, and nice review. Reminds me of the Sangria color I had on my 2020 Telluride. We have a family member who just bought an LT trim one of these new! But this seems waaay overpriced - by at least $10k… And somewhat underpowered and unrefined for 328 HP and a 2.5T.

[@midengineZ06]

I don't think the AWD automatically activates. The AWD has to be manually pushed in.

[@8VD80Y]

Nice design

[@jessicaherrera5886]

Can you do a review of the RS trim

[@lukeehlen9202]

This or the pilot trailsport?

[@user-qg2tl3jk9z]

$55k for fake leather? Especially when we know this is gonna cost $30k in 2 years? A high-compression turbo 4-cylinder made by GM? Yeah no thanks 😅

[@Mr.McFlyyy]

Torque converter shutter on a brand new car is absolutely wild!! GM quality issues strike again

[@Stressless2023]

He said it's a pre-production car at 27:59 and likely has been driven hard by other journalists on top of that.

[@JLC-zg5rd]

I have a 2022 GMC Canyon and the 8 speed has a shutter from time to time problems starting to be noticed at about 3000 miles - my biggest concern is the rear end rattling and sounding like it is loose - they already replaced the rear passenger side drive shaft due to it having to much play - it still has to much play but they tell me it is in spec. I think GM does not do very well on stack up tolerancing in the manufacturing and design process - this is my first GM in 14 years - i have bought 4 toyotas and 1 Honda they do not have problems like this typically at least non of mine did with over 380,000 combined mileage being put on them (1 toyota i drove 5 years & over 100000 miles and ZERO issues with it)

[@RobertMarkowicz-f9l]

Look up the article about the woman in Florida who's tail light cought on fire in traverse. Gm covered the tail light but would not repair pant job.

[@RobertMarkowicz-f9l]

@@lilred1107 gm sucks

[@lilred1107]

@@RobertMarkowicz-f9l 👍

[@RobertMarkowicz-f9l]

Off road ha ha it can't handle the pot holes in my state

[@byronherndon533]

I might sound a little bit old-school but in these days and time do they still make GM parts from General Motors? I’m guessing or are they making their parts overseas?

[@skurukutoy]

"Assembled in the US with globally sourced materials"

[@lawrence112]

Idk man I drove one in sport mode and it just felt so weak.

[@F510C]

Why is the 3rd row space so tiny for the size of this suv.

[@jeffs6090]

I'd get the RS only if it had different interior options. The red accents are too tacky for me. I'll wait for the High Country next year that should hopefully have a nice brown leather.

[@user-up1wy3sy8k]

That color is awesome. I remember a similar color was available on the first gen. Tahoe. I hope this stardust metallic is available on the new 25 Tahoe z71. So unique.

[@Michael-li3id]

Needs Phev powertrain to give it 40 MPG.

[@Jonathan-bk3dq]

Okay, if they're going to do turbo 4's, they should offer the 2.7 for an upgrade engine, even though the 2.5 isn't underpowered.

[@fyffitness]

40k tops. Chevrolet and all economy cars need to start at 25k and range out to 40k max if they’re going to put in 4cyl and cvt transmissions. Cars are cheaper to produce now than ever before, corporations are exporting the manufacturing to 3rd world countries, and raising prices on us. Fuck Chevrolet and the rest until they start sharing the discounts.

[@waled121]

If you’re broke, just say you’re broke. Let’s be real… No one is going to share discounts. Also, it’s not CVT.

[@aa-hd3ih]

Gm uses the worst quality parts ever too and they upcharge simply because their cars are on the big side ! My 2013 Malibu was beyond cheap (leather, plastics all felt awful and even worse than the most basic Mitsubishi’s, I kid you not) - GM is the worst automaker also when it comes to their cars’ weight balance and mgmt!

[@lilred1107]

What rock do you live under? A loaded compact sedan can easily inch close to $40k

[@rod7434]

Does GM even have a V6? Why not like BMW and have a 3.0L twin Turbo V6 that gets good mileage…? 4 cylinders in such a family hauler are just weak.

[@obedjimenez4229]

The base 2.3 engine in the Explorer is way faster than this even with less hp and torque

[@JLC-zg5rd]

Fords engines are not good - many are no good mechanic will tell you to stay away from the Ecoboost engines

[@mikeizzo1993]

Off road packages on family vehicles are meant for potholes and bad roads

[@dang1953]

Or driving on the beach?

[@Thisiscrazy2023]

Nice but the word is the transmissions are failing with a few hundred miles on a number of them.

[@jraheemjefcoat429]

Its pitiful that the Honda Pilot has now the smallest infotainment screen in their segment now (7-9in). Wake up, Honda! You've been slipping on features for almost a decade now.

[@gabepena2689]

But it has a proper engine for it's size...

[@jraheemjefcoat429]

@gabepena2689 Yeah, for now. Keep in mind that v6 engines are going away due to government emission regulations. But most people spend time in the interior. Palisade and Telluride have V6 and not rocking a pathetic small infotainment screen. Honda has a 12-inch screen on the new Accord, but not on their flagship Pilot? Make it make sense! They had all the opportunity to upgrade the screen on their 2025 "refresh", but didn't. Honda has fallen behind from the competition, and it shows all throughout the lineup. I'm not a Honda hater. I used to love Honda. But they are being too complacent. Especially with the styling of the AARP special, Honda Accord. It's the most boring looking sedan I have ever seen since the Ford Taurus.

[@gabepena2689]

Well I know Honda just redesigned the V6 to meet emissions for next 10 years. I just think you can't just look at an infotainment as one of the top features, especially if you are long to keep 3 yrs plus. When I bought my previous vehicle three years ago it had the best infotainment out there and now it looks outdated

[@jraheemjefcoat429]

@gabepena2689 I get what you're saying. But my gripe with Honda is not that they are not competitive enough. Again, why does the Accord have a 12 inch screen and the Pilot doesn't? I don't know what age demographics you are in, but the younger Millenials and Gen Zs are very tech forward. There's no "wow" factor with Pilot. Honda is catering more to their loyal mature customers but not doing anything to sway younger families to buy their vehicles. My cousin is a salesman for Honda. He told me that a younger couple, probably in their late 20s and early 30s, didn't purchase the Pilot because they feel that the interior feels a little dated and the screen was too small (7inches) on the base Sport trim. Then, he sold it to a middle-aged couple who just traded in their 2018 Pilot. My thing is Honda had plenty of opportunities to update the screen. But choose not to. A big omission on their part, especially since their is no hybrid option. The next generation, 2026 Palisade and Telluride, will have a hybrid powertain option. Which is now lagging behind the competition. Honda has always been a day late and a dollar short.

[@gabepena2689]

I mean I'll be 100% Honest, it's not competitive enough in the tech department. I'm 32 and I own a 2024 Sport. When I was shopping I test drove Pathfinder, Telluride, Ascent, and Grand Highlander. Looks are subjective, so I won't comment on that, what Honda did very well was cargo space, third row space, storage and drive quality ( pilot is big but feels and handles like a smaller vehicle). That being said the only other one that could match all of that was the Grand Highlander but the turbo in the Highlander just didn't feel as smooth and felt overworked when pushed compared to the Pilot. Was it disappointing that the pilot didn't have a larger infotainment, yes absolutely but car play works well and overall tech is easy to use, and the pilot does everything else so we'll that it didn't mind it. Also as someone who takes long road trips driving at night I don't mind the smaller screen, the large screens can be a huge distraction driving in dark highways.

[@RobertMarkowicz-f9l]

Check out the crash test from the rear. I wouldn't let the dog ride in the third row.

[@yupperdude1]

What makes this 14k more than a telluride?

[@DeadAir21]

What do you mean the Z71 trim is about 3k more than the telluride equivalent SX XPro.

[@VaunShiz]

What ? Lmao there are plenty Telluride for 50k , this is 55 🙈

[@briankay5384]

The shifter is hideous 😂

[@sopheaknorn7041]

hi bro engine gasoline or diesel ⛽❤❤❤❤

[@stromghouls]

with that curb weight, it was never going to be fast. put that engine in the Equinox and watch it fly. this engine belongs in compact suv's

[@jurbina23]

What is the point of electric seats if there is no memory function? You have to upgrade to the top of the line for that feature? Car companies are becoming petty

[@chungqiu9570]

Did you buy it, too? The headrest of the third row seat can not be put, put down will get stuck in the second row seat there, to wait for the recall, every car is like this, the official website says that there is no parts and other notice [laughing cry R]

[@10heads7dragons]

I like it..

[@coryglueckert1665]

it looks so much better than the previous generation. but if they are going to have a 4 cylinder turbo they should've made it a hybrid.

[@futurefunk88eddins96]

Direct injection ,active fuel management , high pressure pumps, more gears. High spool turbos. Belt driven oil pumps. More ways for everything to go wrong. Would not purchase anything made after 2013.

[@Gmoneyluv4u]

The transmissions were horrible hope they improved the knocks 😮

[@andersonrodriguez8258]

Is gm doubt it until they force to do recalls

[@NeoTechOps]

GM uses Google Built In not Android Automotive. Two different things.

[@MoeMoe-nu7vt]

This is the most beautiful SUV on the market BUT it is a Chevy w 4 bangers turbo 🙈🙈🙈🙈

[@dadTan-v7w]

5'1

[@G-Rated]

It’s beautiful. The Traverse team did a damn good job for a segment so crowded. Now here comes the cheap crowd that should be shopping for a Chevrolet Trax complaining about the price of this Traverse Z71 in 1, 2, 3…

[@chrisb9478]

I would buy a Honda Pilot so it’ll last over 100k miles 😁

[@katarinaericka-kristavonbr7000]

I enjoy your videos all the time and I really like the Z71 Stardust color but when I went to the website, it does not allow you to pick Stardust color for the Z71, is the vehicle you’re driving just a oddity or a demo and they’re just not offering that color and a Z71?

[@pfwww12]

GO CHEVY!! NON HYBRID OR EV YET ACHIEVES A 450 MPG RANGE ON FULL TANK???? YALL ARE HATERSSSSSSS LOL