The Best AI Image Upscaler Just Leveled Up 16x!

Today we're taking a deep dive into the latest update from Magnific.AI, a remarkable AI Image Upscaler which has the unique feature of adding an additional spark of creativity to your image.
In the latest update, Magnific now allows to 16x your image, but there is a limitation that we'll go over in the video. I'm taking a deep dive into all the controls and providing lot of creative examples with how you can use this remarkable AI tool.
Additionally, we'll be taking a look at some AI Art Controversy that recently surfaced regarding the Card game "Magic The Gathering" and some AI generated assets.
I'll also be taking a look at some emerging Holodeck (for real!) technology coming from Meta, and a few announcements from CES 2024.
Finally, we'll round out with some insider tips on creating Consistent AI Characters in Scenario, which I covered in the last video!
LINKS
Magnific: magnific.ai/
Scenario: app.scenario.com/?ref=theoret...
👉 Stay Connected:
Twitter: / theomediaai
Join the Discord: / discord
🙏 Support the Channel:If you'd like, please join the Patreon Here: patreon.com/TheoreticallyMedia
Like, Comment, and Subscribe if you enjoyed the video.
Hit the bell icon to stay updated on our latest uploads.
📺 Watch Next:
This New AI Tool Does Consistent Characters (For Real)
• This New AI Tool Does ...
00:00 - Intro
0:37 - 🖼️ Magnific.AI has released an update that allows for up to 16x upscales or up to 10,000x 10,000 pixels for images, providing impressive upscaling capabilities.
02:05 🧭 UI Walkthrough
5:20 Creative use case for Upscale
5:52 - Limitation of Magnific, and one of the big downsides.
08:26 🃏 Wizards of the Coast, owners of Magic: The Gathering, initially denied using AI-generated assets, but later attributed the incident to a vendor. The incident highlighted the challenges of enforcing anti-AI art policies.
10:37 🌟 Meta has released audio-to-photo-real embodiments, turning audio into photorealistic animated character avatars. Additionally, CES features the Holo box for generating holograms of individuals.
12:22 🤖 Scenario offers tips for creating consistent AI characters, such as avoiding white backgrounds in bounding boxes, painting over template characters, and using image references for better results.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Previous Video on Scenario: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJCpiXZmntZkic0

[@_gr1nchh]

$40 a month for an upscaler with limited uses is a lot as most people who do AI art just do it casually. I would like to try it but I can't spend $40 to try it. Wish they had a trial.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I think they’re aiming for Enterprise level users, and if they can manage to bag a few of those, hopefully that can translate into lowering their pricing tier for individuals, or at least start up with free trials.

[@lun321]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Better alternatives will pop up before then.

[@szbkos19140728]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Strange logic. The number of possible Enterprise level customers vs ordinary people who would be interested in AI upscaling is like 1 to 1000. They will never make any decent money from business users for only 40 bucks, on the other hand 40 bucks just for 200+100 image upscaling for regular people is simple too much. When I sit down to experiment with image creation I generate this amount of picture in like 90 minutes, which means I would exhaust the monthly quota in like 2-3 days max.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

@@szbkos19140728 yeah, that’s a good point. And once again illustrates why I’m bad at business. Haha

[@MarkGarrett]

@@szbkos19140728 What other platforms have done is use watermarks. That way you can really kick the tires over as much time as you need to see if it is a good fit. I've also complained about the subscription price. Most of the competitors offer either a one time fee, i.e. Topaz ($199) or a much cheaper monthly rate, i.e. PhotoDirector 365 (~$4/mo. or $99 lifetime)

[@Apuat]

Tim. $40 a month? On top of paying for Chat Gpt, Midjourney, Adobe Creative Suite, Gen 2, etc... It's an expense which is it's just plain unrealistic unless you're a studio. I'm REALLY hope someone comes out with an affordable Magnific killer soon.

[@astralislux305]

Price plan is insane

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Can't argue that it's fairly painful-- but the results are in a class of their own. I don't know of any other upscaler that is doing with Magnific does. But yeah...ouch, wallet.

[@timooothy1234]

​@@TheoreticallyMedia Krea ai has this kind of Upscaler and it's cheaper plus it has other features

[@ysy69]

Yeah, too expensive

[@lenderzconstable]

So….and the price schedule?

[@jichaelmorgan3796]

$1.33 a day is pretty much nothing for a professional

[@Enu_Vibe]

I don’t care if it’s 50x. There is no way I am going to pay $50-90 per month for a glorified upscaler.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I hear you. And I echo that in the video. I genuinely hope they can reduce the cost as some point soon. On the plus side: I know a lot of others are working on similar tools, so options will likely be arriving soon.

[@Leonardfilming]

I dont mind paying $50 if its unlimited, not even the €99 option is unlimited. I use Topaz but that seems designed for photos not ai generated images.

[@therainman7777]

Professionals who actually need this tool will pay it.

[@beedeeuniko]

@@TheoreticallyMediamonthly subs are what keeps these tools profitable, a “pay per usage” would be fairer but not profitable 😅

[@MarkGarrett]

@@therainman7777 Wanna be professionals that are just getting into the game will not be able to know if this tool is good for them. Personally, I see huge potential for restoring, enhancing and then upscaling old photos, i.e. historical, family, vacation, etc. Some things Magnific does really well. This is not one of them. I spoke with Javi and even he had to agree.

[@AG_before]

I love your videos Tim, but I just, for the life of me, _cannot_ understand Magnific's business model of not even offering a free trial - for 2 days, with limited outputs, with watermarks, that self-destruct in 10 seconds! Sure, the platform has an obvious USP, but I want to try it on _my_ material. I'm financially secure enough to pay for it, but out of principle, I will not. I couldn't even find a support or contact button! KREA it is for me. Magnific could...4X...their number of users. That's upscaling the smart way. Thanks for the video. 👍

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

You are 100% preaching to the choir on this one. I don’t know if it’s a scale issue, but even if it was a matter of only letting x amount of people in per day via a waitlist? I think they’d 10x the sub rate if they did that.

[@lun321]

At the moment, there are only two people who run Magnific. Plus, their tutorials are posted on Twitter instead of the website. Not only that, but if the website were to go down, you wouldn't get your money back. This happened to another AI upscale website with a similar quality to Magnific. I've seen Javi's (one of the owners) tweets, and posts like "I hope the GPU holds up!" are not things I would want to hear if I was a subscriber.

[@DivaAi]

Another great video! Thank you for the entertaining and informative videos, Tim! :D

[@thewebstylist]

Great vid highlight and Def hoping a Magnific competitor comes along and soon, Next Level tech indeed!

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I know a lot of people are gunning for it right now, so I’m sure we’ll see some heirs coming along shortly. Remains to be seen if they can crack that extra spicy that Magnific has, but we’ll see. As of yet, I haven’t seen anything beat Topaz for video, and that was a painful one to finally get around to purchasing!

[@JimsworldSanDiego]

Topaz Photo AI does the same, upscaling that is.

[@_gr1nchh]

@@JimsworldSanDiego It doesn't. Topaz is very low quality, artifact-y and very clearly upscaled with AI. Magnific increases quality to an almost indistinguishable quality.

[@MarkGarrett]

@@_gr1nchh have to disagree. I've played around with numerous programs, and overall, Topaz has done the best job. Not perfect by any stretch, but the best so far. I've been using them to try to restore, enhance and then upscale old photos.

[@_gr1nchh]

@@MarkGarrett I've used Topaz as well. It's better than GAN upscalers but it's not good with things like hair and texture. It kind of smudges them together. It's like a higher quality 2.0 from Photoshop. Neither are very good imo. Especially given Topaz's price

[@sidewaysdesign]

For graphic design, crazy upscaling like 16x makes for a great one-two punch for producing vectorized art. Do an AI upscale of a vector-friendly raster image (e.g. a Midjourney-created logo or sticker). AI upscaling intelligently follows lines and curves, producing clean results instead of the over-sharpening fringing with older upscaling methods. Next, take the result and auto-trace in an app like Adobe Illustrator. Typical vector-tracing artifacts - even from Adobe’s archaic auto-trace - virtually disappear due to the enormous increase in resolution. I have tried 4x -> 4x with another upscaler with great results but will certainly give Magnfic a try with 16x in one go. That said, Magnific lacks a PNG download option (unless I'm missing something... and JPEG is precisely the wrong format for crisp graphics.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I still can’t believe that Adobe hasn’t upgraded LiveTrace. Well, maybe they have a bit, to be honest I’m not the strongest at Illustrator- but, still. I was thinking though, at 10kx10k, that basically puts this at large print size. Won’t be long before we’re doing billboard AI images! I’ll give that vector image raster thing a try! That sounds super interesting!

[@sidewaysdesign]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Adobe gave auto-trace a kick in the pants maybe 10 years ago, but it was more of an overhaul with enhanced presets and perhaps multi-threading etc. If there was some sort of rendering change, I couldn't tell. To be fair, no other auto-trace type tools I've seen are noteworthy, either. And on the subject, Adobe’s text-to-vector gen is pretty awful at the moment, but given Adobe’s existential crisis due to AI (after their previous Figma existential crisis), I imagine some updates are on the way.

[@lummi_vfx]

@@TheoreticallyMedia We are already there my friend! Do you remember the "Shot on iPhone" billboard campaign from 2015? Back then iPhone camera was 12MP (approx 4032 pixels by 3024 pixels) and it still looked great! You should try Upscayl for vector image raster upscaling. It's a free software and works amazingly for this!

[@TheFuzzypuddle]

This is incredible compared to other upscalers I'm familiar with. 7:26 I love the "stretch limo" cab.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Haha, I forgot to comment on that in the video, I have legit seen one of those! I mean, granted, that wasn’t intention in the generation, but it does actually exist!

[@micbab-vg2mu]

Thank you for the video - At the beginning I was sceptic about Magnific AI bacause of the price - but after testing it I like it.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

It does do something really unique. I’ll say this: I’ve popped it into 3 videos now, and I never do that!

[@micbab-vg2mu]

Yes the tools is great - I achive similar results in SD but to do Magnific AI quality you need huge computer power - I hope in few months we will have somthing similar twice cheaper:)@@TheoreticallyMedia

[@christopherd.winnan8701]

Do you have a link to that hi res renaissance style mega picture? It would be nice to be able to explore some of the details.

[@lun321]

The Magic: the Gathering part reminded me of a similar case. Bloomsbury and SJM stated they wouldn't commission AI art, even though the former used an AI stock photo for the latter's UK edition.

[@AnnysLopez-fy9sg]

Wow the details are insane! Can't wait to try it on my old family photos.

[@LouisGedo]

5:11 If that is supposed to be a human silhouette in the reflection, that can be kinda awesome. Imagine being able to prompt specifically for certain new things to become part of a high level upscale? That would bring us quite a bit closer to infinite zooming !!!

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I've seen some stuff that is working towards that-- but it is more in the LCM/Turbo mode, so the results are kinda "warpy"-- but, totally agree! And with all things AI, probably only 3 weeks away!

[@LouisGedo]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Hopefully!!

[@JaimeAndresMedia]

Thank you! God knows I know how much effort it takes to make these videos and you do an excellent job at going through the features of these AI tools! Between you and Matt Wolf I can quickly catch up on all the movements and capabilities for artist in AI, very insightful video as always!

[@Paulo-ut1li]

I’ll keep combining TOPAZ and Stable Diffusion upscalers like LSDR and 4KNMD, the quality is pretty close for much lower price.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Totally-- And I do use/love Topaz as well. There are some other workflows, methods, and platforms coming up on the heels of Magnific. If anything, it shows they've proven that people are really interested in this kind a feature!

[@Paulo-ut1li]

@@TheoreticallyMedia if I was Magnify marketing team Ill just change the focus on upscaling to something else like a generative art combo. This way people would be willing to pay an extra if they know it can also generate amazing images from prompts as well. But new upscalers just come up everyday in stable diffusion community.

[@MarkGarrett]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Yeah, for enhancing and upscaling old photos, Topaz seems to be the best right now. Would love other suggestions.

[@AllanGildea]

Excellent as always. Thank you.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Thank you for watching! Means a ton!

[@Chev1220]

Magnific is great but so expensive. Literally costs as much as 4 generators combined, per month.

[@StuStobbs]

awesome update on magnifc thanks. i use it all the time and love it. do you find that using an un-upscaled midjourney image works better than an up-scaled one? i am not sure - i find that sometimes it works better either way?

[@lun321]

Lol, who designed you?

[@StuStobbs]

er...not sure if it's "designed" but my mum and dad?@@lun321

[@Scott-Zakarin]

The Magnific upcaler update is a game changer. I know what I'm doing tomorro. 🙂

[@BabylonBaller]

Just wanted to say, I Appreciate your updates bud. Magnific is amazing, but yes.. they need to come wayyyy down in price to be competitive

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Oh, I'm right with you. I'll say a good first step might be to offer 10 free upscales before hitting the paywall. At least give some folks a shot a trying it out with their own images (obviously to get them hooked) and then reel them in. Also, I do think there are some upstarts gunning for them as we speak. There is a reason I said at the top of this video: My favorite Upscaler (right now)-- that could change by next week.

[@BabylonBaller]

@@TheoreticallyMedia yup. I tested out Krea ai the other day. It was quite impressive to be honest, especially because it was free to upscale up to 2000 pixels. The only reason why I'm not using them normally is because I can do much better with stable diffusion directly on one of my servers, however, it was convenient to not have to tie up my own machines as it only took a few seconds to upscale on that service

[@tommullinerart]

It would be interesting to see what happens to the NYC street scene when you ask it to upscale sections of it at a time, then restitch them back together.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Ooooooh, that IS a cool idea! Might have to give that one a shot!

[@harrygoldhagen2732]

Another good one, Tim! I wonder how Magnific would do head to head with Topaz?

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I think (and I have to check) that Magnific beats it in terms of upscale size, but is more likely to add weird glitches and artifacts. So, Topaz: “smaller” (still huge!) and more stable. Magnific, bigger but inconsistent. That said, the inconsistency is Magnific’s strength. As Topaz doesn’t have anything like a creativity slider. Oh, and I do use Topaz all the time! It is great as well!

[@christopherd.winnan8701]

Are there any standard benchmarks for upscalers, like there are for LLMs?

[@90sbabybuddha]

I have zero issues with the price because I’m using it for profit. One of my items will pay for 3 months of use. I love it.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I do wonder how many people are quietly sub'd, verses a very vocal number of people who are opposed to the pricing. I always try to stay cognizant of sub prices, but I have learned over the years that what I consider reasonable or unreasonable, can vary quite a bit for someone else. My $20 bottle of wine is someone else's $200. (I'm too old to buy $6 wine. That just gives me a headache anymore!)

[@morpheus2573]

6:00 Looking forward to Ken Burns Italian Renaissance inspired re-make of Hitchcock's "The Apparent."

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Not gonna lie, I had this whole other thing where I wanted to grab those small sections and animate them in Gen-2, then reassemble the whole thing in After Effects. But, that’s also like 35 hours of work right there!

[@morpheus2573]

@@TheoreticallyMedia It's certainly begging for someone with uber time on their hands to go Cecil B. DeMille on its @$$.

[@MrRobertC]

The results I saw here motivated me to check them out. I have a specific use case I’d like to try and I’d be happy to pay if it works. Zero opportunity to demo even 1 image unless I subscribe for 40 a month. NO LIVE SUPPORT. NO TWITTER RESPONSE TO A FRIENDLY QUESTION. Seems like two guys in a basement which fine but I feel like I’m being duped. THIS IS A PUNT. TOPAZ has a decent AI upscaler - pay once for a lifetime license, and it’s regularly updated and improving all the time. Yeah I’m done ranting.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

All valid points. And you are in the nose with the two guys part. I’m not sure about the basement, but again: all totally valid and I’ve heard echoed from others. Hoping this year will bring some support/PR and free trial periods to the platform. I honestly think it is very good, but your points still stand.

[@Kazuya720]

I am totaly amazed what us already possible!

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Every day it gets more incredible!

[@Kazuya720]

@@TheoreticallyMedia I guess you realised this as a great chance. I missed years ago the chance I had to become successful. Wish you all the best.

[@KipRode]

Could you try Magnific on scanned film photos. I am currently scanning family photos from the 60s 70s and 80s and I would like to know how it does on such photos.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

You can. I’ve seen a few people do it. The thing you’ll want to do is to turn down the creativity and turn up the resemblance, or you’ll get “creative” results. Unless that is something you are looking for. If you’re looking to do a straight upscale/cleanup, I’d suggest looking at Topaz Labs Photo 2. It is a bit costly at $199, but you do own it after that- which, these days is a bit rare!

[@StuffedGamer]

that 16x time Magnific reminds me of the nonsense image enhancement in the CSI tvshow :D (imagine if that would have generated random details tho)

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Enhance!! Now rotate 40 degrees! There is is, the killer’s license plate! We got ‘em!! Haha, so stupid

[@nickaww]

ENHANCE

[@brian_larwood]

Is there a AI equivalent that can help with movie film restoration? The project I'm working on, topaz does nothing. I am trying to restore and upscale and generally improve a 8mm movie film

[@gamegeek42]

Can you share the MJ prompt for the cool painting of the cutaway building? We can only see part of the prompt...

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

yup! a painting showing various people inside an elegant building, in the style of pinturicchio, Fantasy iconography, structured chaos, , 8k resolution, terraced cityscapes, carnivalesque, dark navy and bronze --ar 128:65 Fun tip: Play around with the Fantasy keyword and change it to stuff like Sci-Fi or some other genre. It's pretty neat!

[@twilightfilms9436]

Can you please give it a try with an image sequence with actors moving, to see the results? Thanks in advance!

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

It's been tried a few times, but the results come out in that kind of "morphing" and stuttery look. I think they're working on it though.

[@twilightfilms9436]

Similar to Deforum?

[@lenderzconstable]

299 a month? That’s around the price of 3DS Max. Wow. Steep. But if I were a professional raking it in I can see this is what thst plan is for. I’m willing to try anything once. Not the business plan, haha, but when I get ready I’ll try this and hopefully have some fun. This is the time to be trying out all the new models in this 4th Industrial Revolution that we are in. Hopefully I do not need insane gpu and that the installation process is not incredibly sophisticated.

[@spacekitt.n]

they need to level DOWN their price. my god that is insane, what are they thinking

[@johndev2212]

In addition to the great videos, the comments here can be incredibly helpful and thought provoking. 🙂

[@smalltimer4370]

Great to see where things are going - though the service itself is cost prohibitive for all but professional use

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

It’s in a weird spot. You’re totally right, too much for individual experimentation, and fairly unpredictable for the pro level. Still, I think there is something really neat about it.

[@High-Tech-Geek]

Tim, what's your favorite free upscaler?

[@juraganposter]

wait for this available free on stable diffusion

[@MONTY-YTNOM]

Fair play That was impressive, but still out of my price range.

[@miki72869]

there is one problem on this Scenario site, I don't know if I have it or someone else, when registering, you need to send a confirmation from your mailbox, but the script from Scenario does not come to my email, who knows why?

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Maybe check your spam folder? That's weird-- I always get it.

[@lenderzconstable]

I’ve never used an image upscaler. What would a prompt do?

[@evanc1721]

What is the maximum image input size?

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I don't think it has one for input, but it is 10,000x10,000 pixels for output. So, you can bring in any size, you just can't output anything larger than that...which, admittedly, is huge.

[@circelink]

Impressive!

[@evanc1721]

Is there any ai that can take bad 4k blu ray transfers (lord of the rings comes to mind) and make them cinema level video?

[@LifeLedLucid]

interesting video, magnific though has no free plan and the paid option leaves a ton to be desired seeing as how for 39$ (their lowest tier) it only allows 200 images.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I know. The other thing I'd really love for them to implement is a trial period or some test generations. Hopefully it'll happen at some point.

[@crushthedemoniac]

Wanted to try this site after this channel advertised it the first time. This site urges you to sign up. But instead of allowing at least a limited number of trials, after the email confirmation, there was only the page where you were supposed to upgrade your subscription model. It doesn't seem very reputable to me. Not sure what happens if you give them your credit card number.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Yeah, that's a criticism I have with them as well-- I do wish they had a trial period, or allowed for some free generations after signup-- but, the way they're currently running it (BTW, small operation, this is actually just 2 people), they haven't gotten there yet. Hopefully it is added in the future.

[@ATLJB86]

I play MTGA every day! Very competitive at it. A way to keep my brain flowing. TCG stands for trading card game

[@Tyronne_]

crazy image 6:23

[@LuisGrolez]

Time to create some where is Wally

[@lenderzconstable]

10:39 any bias in this model?

[@JimsworldSanDiego]

Please change my mind. I own Topaz Photo AI and would like to compare the results of a 4x upscale of a single photograph - a picture of me standing in front of the Great Pyramid in Egypt. Who has a Magnific account and is open to testing and demonstrating here?

[@TheAmmo4MyArsenal]

I only have access to 2x upscale still. Did I miss something?

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Still? I think I saw them saying you might need to f5? Or maybe clear the cache? I’m seeing a lot of people using it right now

[@TheAmmo4MyArsenal]

@@TheoreticallyMedia yes I’ve been using it this morning and it still only had a 2x option. It says coming soon, but I can always upscale the same image multiple times. I am using it via my mobile phone though. Don’t know if that makes a difference 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@StargateMax]

I can't even try it out, it forces the payment page on me, so I just left it at that. Cool idea though.

[@formattester6]

it completely changes the content.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

In this case, that's actually the selling point. Though, if you turn the creativity slider down, I don't think it changes things.

[@CaptainKokomoGaming]

Such a shame that it coses so much. Even more than most standard image generation platforms. The creator is even offering a "curated list of best prompts" for $99 (usd im assuming). So it just seems he is in it for the money. clearly he has his target audience (Those with disposable income) in mind with his pricing structure, It just leaves it out of reach for the average user which is really confusing.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Yeah. I can’t speak to their pricing plan, but the overwhelming amount of feedback is: lower the price. I don’t know what their margins are, but I think if they could reduce the basic plan to $20 they’d increase the user base by 10x. Of course, there are a lot of scale issues as well- like renting GPUs, so I don’t know if that will balance? It is a shame though, because it is a really good platform.

[@CaptainKokomoGaming]

@@TheoreticallyMedia mate it's awesome to see you trying to interact with nearly all of your comments. I have commented on 2 of your videos recently and you have responded both times. Not many creators do that. It's really good to see.

[@JimmyMarquardsen]

Here's the scam: Those who own the AIs cannot develop them further beyond a critical point where users like us are needed. In order to train and develop them further, it is essential that users use them. The scam consists in getting as many people as necessary to use the AIs for free (without you actually getting much out of it) and getting some individuals (who only get a little more out of it) to pay an absurd amount of money. I'm waiting for it to be cheaper. In the meantime, all those who pay an absurdly high price for it will finance its further development.

[@LouisGedo]

👋

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Good to see you Louis! Hope you're staying warm through this stupid winter storm!

[@bordignonjunior]

amazing but not free.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

super not free, but addressed in the video!

[@PizzaLord]

There is no way to even test this on their website. Just seems to send you to a paywall.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

No demo yet. I know-- I hope they open up the doors a bit soon. I mean, admittedly, Magnific is literally just 2 people...so, I get it.

[@ElectricAlienCat]

I signed up (without paying) and got 50 free credits 😊 I didn't know about this until I went to upscale and saw the credits.

[@PizzaLord]

@@ElectricAlienCat How do u sign up without paying?

[@ElectricAlienCat]

I just signed up with my gmail account

[@ElectricAlienCat]

I did end up paying for a subscription as those credits dont last long but the results were incredible 😮

[@JimsworldSanDiego]

$39 per month Cool, but not $500 a year cool...

[@chuchuchutrain6735]

at $40USD for 200 images Magnific is a big NO NO!

[@jondoe8o]

Yeah, mattvidpro posted a great alternative… these prices are just insane. How much are they paying for the promotion? I hope it’s worth losing your reputation 😂

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Not sponsored. I genuinely like Magnific. And remember, price points are all over the place, to some $40/mo is basically a cup of coffee.

[@Leukick]

LMAO bro, all it is doing is replacing the entire image with new content. Let's not act like it's adding details and upscaling your original image. It's a cool tool of course, but it's just completely replacing your original picture entirely.

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

I should point out, and I always forget to: if you take the creativity down and the resemblance up, it’ll just upscale your image without any alterations. But at that point, just use a regular upscaler.

[@Leukick]

@@TheoreticallyMedia Makes sense

[@newjx]

Good tool but not free..

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Yup. The total opposite of free, in fact.

[@user-nl3yt6cq3j]

40$ a month and 100$ a month thanks for not dsaying that aa$$$wole

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

But…I did say that.

[@MrRomanrin]

it does not work... YOU HAVE TO PAY so no, thanks no

[@TheoreticallyMedia]

Check my community feed, there is a 24 hour free trial going on right now. You can probably make it in the next few hours (to note: You don't have to use the credits right now, you just claim 120 free credits)

[@Bright123-fp3jl]

>< I believe we are meant to be like Jesus in our hearts and not in our flesh. But be careful of AI, for it knows only things of the flesh such as our fleshly desires and cannot comprehend things of the Spirit such as true love and eternal joy that comes from obeying God's Word [Galatians 5:16-26]. Man is a spirit and has a soul but lives in a body which is flesh. When you go to bed it is the flesh that sleeps, but your spirit never sleeps and that is why you have dreams, unless you have died in peace physically. More so, true love that endures and last is a thing of the heart. When I say 'heart', I mean 'spirit'. But fake love, pretentious love, love with expectations, love for classic reasons, love for material reasons (love because of material needs) and love for selfish reasons those are things of the flesh. In the beginning God said let us make man in our own image, according to our likeness. Take note, God is Spirit and God is Love. As Love He is the source of it. We also know that God is Omnipotent, for He creates out of nothing and He has no beginning and has no end. That means, our love is but a shadow of God's Love. True love looks around to see who is in need of your help, your smile, your possessions, your money, your strength, your quality time. Love forgives and forgets. Love wants for others what it wants for itself. However, true love works in conjunction with other spiritual forces such as patience and faith - in the finished work of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, rather than in what man has done such as science, technology and organizations which won't last forever. To avoid sin and error which leads to the death of your body and your spirit-soul in hell fire (second death), you must make God's Word the standard for your life, not AI. If not, God will let you face AI on your own (with your own strength) and it will cast the truth down to the ground, it will be the cause of so much destruction like never seen before, it will deceive many and take many captive in order to enslave them into worshipping it and abiding in lawlessness. We can only destroy ourselves but with God all things are possible. God knows us better because He is our Creater and He knows our beginning and our end. The prove texts can be found in the book of John 5:31-44, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Daniel 2, Daniel 7-9, Revelation 13-15, Matthew 24-25 and Luke 21. *HOW TO MAKE GOD'S WORD THE STANDARD FOR YOUR LIFE?* You must read your Bible slowly, attentively and repeatedly, having this in mind that Christianity is not a religion but a Love relationship. It is measured by the love you have for God and the love you have for your neighbor. Matthew 5:13 says, "You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men." Our spirits can only be purified while in the body (while on earth) but after death anything unpurified (unclean) cannot enter Heaven Gates. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God [Matthew 5:8]. No one in his right mind can risk or even bare to put anything rotten into his body nor put the rotten thing closer to the those which are not rotten. Sin makes the heart unclean but you can ask God to forgive you, to save your soul, to cleanse you of your sin, to purify your heart by the blood of His Son, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ which He shed here on earth because Isaiah 53:5 says, "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed". Meditation in the Word of God is a visit to God because God is in His Word. We know God through His Word because the Word He speaks represent His heart's desires. Meditation is a thing of the heart, not a thing of the mind. Thinking is lower level while meditation is upper level. You think of your problems, your troubles but inorder to meditate, you must let go of your own will, your own desires, your own ways and let the Word you read prevail over thinking process by thinking of it more and more, until the Word gets into your blood and gains supremacy over you. That is when meditation comes - naturally without forcing yourself, turning the Word over and over in your heart. You can be having a conversation with someone while meditating in your heart - saying 'Thank you, Jesus...' over and over in your heart. But it is hard to meditate when you haven't let go of offence and past hurts. Your pain of the past, leave it for God, don't worry yourself, Jesus is alive, you can face tomorrow, He understands what you are passing through today. Begin to meditate on this prayer day and night (in all that you do), "Lord take more of me and give me more of you. Give me more of your holiness, faithfulness, obedience, self-control, purity, humility, love, goodness, kindness, joy, patience, forgiveness, wisdom, understanding, calmness, perseverance... Make me a channel of shinning light where there is darkness, a channel of pardon where there is injury, a channel of love where there is hatred, a channel of humility where there is pride..." The Word of God becomes a part of us by meditation, not by saying words but spirit prayer (prayer from the heart). Take note, God is Spirit and those who worship Him should do so in spirit and truth. When the Word becomes a part of you, it will by its very nature influence your conduct and behavior. Your bad habits, you will no longer have the urge to do them. You will think differently, dream differently, act differently and talk differently - if something does not qualify for meditation, it does not qualify for conversation. *THE BATTLE BETWEEN LIGHT AND DARKNESS (GOOD AND EVIL)* Heaven is God's throne and the dwelling place for God's angels and the saints. Hell was meant for the devil (satan) and the fallen angels. Those who torture the souls in hell are demons (unclean spirits). Man's spirit is a free moral agent. You can either yield yourself to God or to the devil because God has given us discretion. If one thinks he possesses only his own spirit, he is lying to himself and he is already in the dark. God is light while the devil is darkness. Light (Holy Spirit) and darkness (evil spirit) cannot stay together in a man's body. God is Love (Love is light) and where there is no love is hell, just as where there is no light is darkness. The one you yield yourself to, you will get his reward. The reward of righteousness to man's spirit is life (abundant life) and the reward of sin to man's spirit is death. Sin and satan are one and the same. Whatever sin can cause, satan also can cause. Sin is what gives the devil dominion or power over man's spirit. When God's Word becomes a part of you, sin power over you is broken, you become the righteousness of God through Christ Jesus. Where Jesus is, you are and when He went (to the Father), you went. In the book of John 8:42-47, Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me. Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” My prayer is, "May God bless His Word in the midst of your heart." Glory and honour be to God our Father, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and our Helper the Holy Spirit. Watch and pray!... Thank you for your time and may God bless you as you share this message with others.

[@lun321]

If AI knew only things of the flesh, human hands wouldn't look so terrible.

[@user-oq2bn4wq1y]

Again, the word template rhymes with hem slit not hem slate. This isn't an alternative pronunciation situation, you are pronouncing the word incorrectly.

[@joelface]

The British pronunciation is tem-playt, while the American pronunciation is tem-plet. Either way, it's a silly thing to try to police someone else on.

[@user-oq2bn4wq1y]

​@@joelface Dude isn't British (you can tell by his teeth).

[@joelface]

@@user-oq2bn4wq1y There also isn't just one American accent... people pronounce things based on regional differences. You said there is only one correct way to say it, which is false.

[@user-oq2bn4wq1y]

@@joelface no, it's only correct one way (limey's don't count).