I gave up understanding the film about 30 minutes in, and just loved the acting of all the characters. Loved all the Martha Vickers scenes.
@rocistone6570 Жыл бұрын
Martha Vickers part got cut down to make room for more Betty. Martha was NOT happy about it at all.
@duncanrichardson2167 Жыл бұрын
Hardly surprising, even Raymond Chandler the author of the novel on which the film was based, did not understand the plot of the film.
@ericw32297 ай бұрын
@duncanrichardson2167 Not surprising since the movie left out so many key elements of the plot
@rwarren582 ай бұрын
Okay! I wasn’t wrong in thinking it would be another’to have and have not’.
@a11oge2 күн бұрын
@@duncanrichardson2167 I was going to say that.
@carsondelacroix89422 ай бұрын
Just saw this again in a theatre. I realized something. It is supposed to be confusing. Like real life. Everything is complicate. There are always loose ends. One of the greatest movies ever made. Boggies best by far.
@sclogse1Ай бұрын
Check out The Good Thief with Nick Nolte and The Coca Cola Kid with Eric Roberts.
@michaelersing415810 ай бұрын
I had a DVD of the first version, which I prefer. More of Faulkner’s (the screenwriter!) strange conversational poetry. Fast talking. Still, just as in the book- it is never revealed who offed the Owen character, who was in love with Vickers’ character whose performance is genuinely surreal - amazing.
@michaelcarlson75753 ай бұрын
Owen is killed by Joe Brody to get the blackmail film of Carmen
@MarceloCarmello-y8s2 ай бұрын
Thank you seth wolf for the sequence! Very clarifying. A pity KZbin trimmed it down to 9 minutes.
@robertgallagher52854 ай бұрын
In the novel Marlowe was more no nonsense in the second bookstore scene he just left after he got the description of Geigar in the movie he stayed and had some whiskey with the beautiful 😍 clerk good screenplay adding some romance like they wanted in the movies!!!!!
@a11oge2 күн бұрын
Quote from WIKI "Midway through filming, Hawks and the cast realized that they did not know whether the chauffeur Owen Taylor had killed himself or was murdered. A cable was sent to Chandler, who told his friend Jamie Hamilton in a March 21, 1949 letter: "They sent me a wire ... asking me, and dammit I didn't know either".
@TerryUniGeezerPetersonАй бұрын
The guy behind the desk is the guy who shot Little Caesar at the end of the 1930 classic.
@artgonzalez8822 Жыл бұрын
They just don't make them like that no more
@stevenlord77933 ай бұрын
It's a very simple plot: Carmen kills Regan (backstory) Owen kills Geiger Brody kills Owen Carol kills Brody Canino kills Jones Marlow kills Canino Mar's boys kill Mars (Only 7 killers, what's the problem?)
@stevenlord77933 ай бұрын
Mars' boys (that should have read)
@mashk3 ай бұрын
Does Brody kill Owen? It’s a bit ambiguous. Brody definitely knocks out Owen and steals Carmen’s photos. But it’s never clarified whether Owen commits suicide by driving his car into the sea or whether Brody does it. Brody always seemed to be in way over his head and not ruthless enough for the latter. Would Agnes be able to push around a killer?
@davidcbr0wn Жыл бұрын
Can tell this never got into the movie because there is no Max Steiner music.
@rocistone6570 Жыл бұрын
The re-shoots to accent Betty and Bogie work a lot better. As to this boring slideshow, most of this information is in the better version of the movie we know today. Overall, this footage has a bad case of "Tell don't show" which is both boring and fatal to most stories, but uniquely fatal to who-done-its. This is slow, and ponderous in spots. That other cop in the DA's office (Cronyeger) is strictly out of central casting. Bernie didn't need a pigeon that badly. Cronyeger came across like a buzzard. Howard Hawks made a good call. More Betty, fewer rooms full of guys yaking it up to tell us a story we never see. Thanks for letting people see why the second version was and still is so much better.
@jimgallagher2979 Жыл бұрын
Interesting that Hawks himself fell in love with Bacall. She was just a kid but grew up fast with the crowd she was running with.
@eFMe-fk1xh4 ай бұрын
Yes, the cut version was better, Hawks knew how the tell a dry and entertaining story better than anyone. Characters and fun above all. It was typical of the classic Hollywood but especially Hawks: he didn't care if the movie missed something, the only question he asked is "Is it entertaining?", because at the end of the movie that's what counts in a viewer's mind. And after all these decades we are still here celebrating this movie exactly as Hawks wanted: "The plot was confusing... but it was perfectly noir and incredibly fun!".
@us-Bahn3 ай бұрын
More or less the whole movie is told. You rarely see anything happen.
@a11oge2 күн бұрын
To quote WIKI "Film critic Roger Ebert, who described the movie as being about the "process of a criminal investigation, not its results", preferred the 1946 version and said. ' The new scenes [of the 1946 version] add a charge to the film that was missing in the 1945 version; this is a case where "studio interference" was exactly the right thing. The only reason to see the earlier version is to go behind the scenes, to learn how the tone and impact of a movie can be altered with just a few scenes... As for the 1946 version that we have been watching all of these years, it is one of the great films noir, a black-and-white symphony that exactly reproduces Chandler's ability, on the page, to find a tone of voice that keeps its distance, and yet is wry and humorous and cares."
@rocistone6570Күн бұрын
@@a11oge I'm shaky on the "Not the results" part. Enough happens to enough bad people that they may not face a judge but get what's coming to them. And enough people on the other side get enough help and rewards along the way to make it all worthwhile. Carmen goes to a head shrinker, which is the best outcome she could hope for given what she has done. The old General gets what he wants: more stability in his family, but at a price. Jones' death is avenged. What Our two stars get-- I'll leave that to your imagination. There really is enough of an ending there if you can pick up the threads, The problem with most "Who-duunit pictures is that people want to get spoonfed an ending, That comes from the detectives of literature, Sherlock Holmes and Charlie Chan (Not a knock by any means) But in the "Noir" (Real) world, things are seldom as clean as all that. Justice as an ending sometimes has a murky side.
@NancyFreire-dv4pi2 ай бұрын
Pork chops and apple sauce 😊
@sammajor2075Ай бұрын
😂
@mercedyzmarieguion292 Жыл бұрын
Mr. Wilde police commissioner is the lieutenant who chased Edward G. Robinson in "Little Caesar ". He was good in LC.
@stevekaczynski37935 сағат бұрын
While it's interesting, I can see why they ditched most of this and re-arranged the last bit. Bacall wearing a veil seemed a bit odd, though perhaps it was meant as a sort of semi-disguise when entering the office of a private investigator.
@sammajor2075Ай бұрын
Get yourself a friend like Bernie Ohls. The O.G. Ride or Die.
@stormyone6 ай бұрын
Bogie drinks Brandy with Bacall but drinks rye with Malone?
@LoranHarding5 ай бұрын
She invites him for brandy. He says he likes brandy. She says she has lots of it. Man, that is clever dialog. They didn't mean brandy, but it sounded close.
@LoranHarding3 ай бұрын
@@ericrobson4291 WTF?--LH
@michaelcarlson75753 ай бұрын
Brandy is classier than rye. I thought it was funny Marlowe would walk around with a glass half pint of rye in his pocket.
@stormyone3 ай бұрын
Marlowe says “pretty good rye”. Better than standard rye? Anyway, Marlowe must have been a Boyscout - “Be prepared”. No better example.
@terenzo508 ай бұрын
This was the original which was cut (the DA scene) and reshot (Bacall visits Marlowe). My personal preference is to keep the DA scene as is, but use the reshot scene with Bacall where they meet at a bar and have a drink -- even though there's a glaring error of continuity in it.
@stevekaczynski37935 сағат бұрын
Shorthand work going to waste... Not sure if it was Gregg or Pitman...
@antonyadshead96510 ай бұрын
IIRC the thing that really changed it from the book was the change to the Bacall character that reduced her to a love interest and not the antagonist she was in the book.
@ericw32297 ай бұрын
The scene should have been left in
@sclogse1Ай бұрын
Who ever came up with a face net especially for young gals?
@notleonard Жыл бұрын
Well the film cuts the fact that Geiger was gay and that his relationship explains the plot of the first half of the book/film. In the film someone says, "but what was his motive!?" and marlowe says something like, "check his gun, the bullets match! you don't need a motive." Marlowe drops a couple of nasty homophobic f-bombs in the book as he explains it. Hardly "sexy." But it is built into the structure of the story. Take the homosexuality out and the plot doesn't make any sense.
@odysseusprodromou3260 Жыл бұрын
The 'plot' is Sternwood hires Marlowe to put an end to Geiger's attempt to blackmail him. The homosexuality is incidental but part of the narrative, a labyrinthine narrative that uncovers murder, corruption, the racketeering involving pornography & gambling & narcotics, nymphomania, alcoholism and murder...in short, a film noir narrative...
@katharineofarrogant7805 Жыл бұрын
That is so helpful. Mustve watched this 100 times but hadnt read the book !Thank you!
@notleonard Жыл бұрын
@@katharineofarrogant7805 definitely worth reading, I love his stuff and also the work of Jim Thompson....really anything in that genre
@katharineofarrogant7805 Жыл бұрын
@Josh Platt I shall read it and check out your other recommendation. Thanks!
@michaelcarlson75753 ай бұрын
It's pretty obvious. "Carol" kills Brody for revenge thinking Joe killed Geiger.
@billthestinker Жыл бұрын
Marlowe is bisexual
@Retroscoop Жыл бұрын
Some nicknames are really spot on
@crivket1233 Жыл бұрын
You keep wishing !!!!
@philash100010 ай бұрын
Nah a Sigma male ...who knows the dames are flawed ...who eventually crave Marlowe's invitation to the path of righteousness....but cannot meet his exacting demands and standards ....and so his search goes on ......personally I d go back to the book store....for Dorothy ❤
@JarJarBinks4ever9 ай бұрын
Read The Big Sleep and think again
@plasticweapon6 ай бұрын
well, you're not bisexual bill. you're gay.
@shauny22853 ай бұрын
I wonder if they still teach shorthand? Cheers!
@stevekaczynski37935 сағат бұрын
I learned a different type (Teeline) years ago and have resumed practising it since it got rusty.