The Camcorder of the Future? | Canon XF705 - First Look

[@momchilminkov5722]

In the TV station I work, we have (for field production) 2 or 3 bigger, on-shoulder cameras and at least 8 of these hand-held camcorders. People who compare DSLRs or digital Cine cameras with camcorders are comparing apples to oranges. This type of camera is perfect if you want something that shoots only video, produces quick delivery footage and is all-in-one package. No, there is no time to change your lens if you are shooting a march of protesters in the street and something happens 100 yards away. You need to zoom there in 1 second, not open your bag to look for "the telephoto lens". And there is no time to screw-in your ND filter if you are chasing a person, who is avoiding you and suddenly exits from indoors to bright daylight. You need to have that filter on a 1-click button. So, in short, these cameras look like that and perform like that because they are best for a specific type of work. Because the average consumer is not buying them, they are not featured in the thousands reviews of DSLRs, mirrorless or cinema cameras and lenses. But the professionals who use them, need exactly that. And about this particular camera - the only problem I see with it is the high price. Having said that - the camcorders we use are one of the older Sony models, I believe AX1. Each of them have recorded thousand of hours of video and hundreds of reports. We still use them every day. Believe me, in the long run - the price is justified.

[@brandonse167]

That's very true. I remember working with someone who came from the camcorder world and I had to explain to him what a par-focal lens means because he kept getting pissed that he couldn't zoom in to focus! I'm talking about DSLR shooting. This thing is designed to send someone out to do live coverage of an event . . . or lets say even a concert and then have it OUT as fast as possible. The$ 7,000 price tag still seems like a lot. But the truth is, even if your doing more high end commercial stuff. With that camera you could out shoot just about anyone. Still, makes me wonder if it's worth it to buy a Canon cinema camera with auto focus and throw a TV lens on it.

[@megamattzero7348]

You must be at a fancy TV station that can upgrade instantly. The local TV station I work at we still use Sony EXR1 for most of our MMJs. We only have 2x Sony PXW 400 XDCAMs for special projects. I don't get to see a 4K or a h265 anytime soon.

[@josephjohn3560]

One acronym defines the purpose of this type of camera...ENG. I 100% agreed with what you are stating here. The main difference between the cinematic approach and the ENG field work is based on time and opportunity.

[@atomka2433]

You can do the exact same thing with a full frame DSLR with a 24-105 on your shoulder, the quality will be the same (sometimes better) but for 3 times cheaper. Those products are aimed for pros' that's why they don't give a **** about the quality/price ratio.

[@momchilminkov5722]

@@atomka2433 Try shooting something that is 100 yards away with a 105mm lens. The new Sony Z190 offers 29 to 720 mm in FF equivalent. This Canon goes shorter, because of the bigger chip and smaller crop factor, but still goes tot about 400 on the long end. And that is what a broadcast TV cameraman needs, it's not a whim. 105 would be impossible. Then try to attach two XLR microphones to a DSLR. Or to shoot inside and outside in quick succession without putting on/off a ND filter. As I said before - these camcorders pack exactly these features, because they are needed for a specific type of work. It's ridiculous to think one can do the same with a DSLR.

[@DeWayneDrumgole]

Love my 305 that I rented a 705 and I loved it. Just purchased mine and I can't wait to get it. To each their own, I make mine work for me and it pays for itself.

[@hitchjack]

2:04 - That jump cut stole your glasses... call the police!

[@AlBergstein]

So this is the first review I've seen so far on the 705. Having used a 305 for many years (since 2011), along with 5Ds, Panny GH4/5, Canon C100, etc. It's always funny how people want to compare a camcorder with a digital cine. They are two different tools. Both have their place. I loved the xf305 for many reasons, and hated for some as well. Ergonomically this new XF705 should be superb. The XF305 also had some of the best HD color palette I've ever used. For shooting stage presentations under stage lighting it is still the best looking footage I've ever shot. When I got hired to do a 3 camera stage shoot two years ago I hired a shooter with an XF305 and rented a third. The smooth crawl needed by a fixed lens for stage work is a must, and *no* DSLR can do it. I've tried. Trying to change batteries or even cards on a long stage shoot with a DLSR is a joke. It's trivial with this form factor. Yep, it's expensive, but I've spent about $7k kitting out a 5D, or a GH5 to do the same damn thing this does. Go buy yourself a 300MM or longer Canon or Panny lens and a couple of quality primes. So what you didn't cover that you could have covered is typical run and gun situations. You are shooting indoors for this review! Do a head and shoulders short and show us it's DOF in a typical office shooting environment! Light a three point lighting interview and let's see what the 1" sensor can do? What about low light? Couldn't you have stopped off at a pub on the way home from a field shoot and shot something to show that it can finally handle low light without jacking the ISO to 5K or carrying lights? And did they keep the most useful dam thing the XF305 had, which was a (polar) vector scope? It was the easiest way to get a neutral color balance. I have one on my GH5 but it can't be set while shooting. You don't know what you are missing until you work with one. I shot a lot of documentary stuff with my XF305, it didn't look as good or perform as well in low light as my C100 or 5D, but maybe this xf705 can come closer? And please, no comparisons with the XF200 etc. the XF200 and others are just a joke. They are not serious tools. Been there, tried them. You need the three ring setups on the xf305 or 705 to really work fast. I've rented some of these 'lessor' models and they really suck. Something is given up. About all I got out of them was infared mode for one specialty commercial. The XF705 appears to be made for pros but sadly is years late. Usual Canon problem. Will have to rent one soon, and will certainly rent it for stage work. It will find it's home in the rental pools but is a specialty tool. Thanks for your work on the review.

[@stephenbrouillette4541]

Last year I transitioned away from a UX-90 to a GH5. Parts of me really miss the camcorder form factor, especially for stage shoots. I'm probably (at the moment) where you were a while back realizing that DSLRs don't do stage shoots very well. Agreed all-round, they're job-specific tools.

[@nicholasolivas317]

@@beingyourself6813 you can use DSLR'S but depends on the documentary you are filming and the environments you will be in.

[@annekedebruyn7797]

People who shoot corporate (lets face it, that's 90% of the people here bitching) don't understand the toughness of these type of camcorders. Not to ditch on them, it's a honest job but your camera, at most, will probably encounter very light rain with some heat or a bit cold. Maybe freezing. Oh no, the camera froze due to heat. Lets wait a minute to let it cool down. Yeah that's something I can't do. These camcorders are tough, very stable and very easy to use near blind in the field with high quality optics. These are the the kind of cameras that will go into the jungle a few days after having been used in the arctic or in war while going live for a political event after that. Versatile and a camera you can trust in every situation, that's the exact market they are going for and that doesn't come cheap. People these days are just seeing the image and the spec sheet and forget literally everything else.

[@nicholasolivas317]

@@annekedebruyn7797 damn straight. 🤘

[@frigbychilwether]

One advantage of shooting in the UK in November with grey skies is everything looks like it's Log so easy to grade !

[@ProAVTV]

Just in November? The UK log look is almost permanent in the winter! Dan

[@MyNoctis]

​@@ProAVTV lucky you Here in Algerie it's always sunny :(

[@jonathonfrum8084]

Hats off for having the only decent footage from this camera on all of youtube. I can't understand why no one is posting anything. Makes me want to buy or rent the damn thing just to find out what the footage looks like.

[@randyburleson]

Could you compare the Canon XF705 and the Panasonic AG-CX350?

[@infotainmentonline]

How to import the footage from XF 709 in FCPX, Resolve or Adobe Premiere ?. Non of these editing applications support this MXF- HEVC/ H.265, recording format even with latest updates..

[@AlexMcBurney_ASU]

This a fabulous camera. I have 40 of them for my university students to use and have had no issues. Durable, versatile and straight forward to use.

[@anonymissed3611]

Autofocus good in both 4k and 1080? Smooth zoom with a remote control?

[@Nordbiene]

Great video. Best regards from Germany. Kai the bee filmer 🤤

[@dispatchnews]

So glad to see this review. Thank you guys for doing one so quickly. Answered a lot of questions for me on the visual side.

[@ProAVTV]

No problem! Glad it was useful, thanks for watching Carl

[@RSafay]

It is interesting that when the Canon XF305 came out in 2010 it cost $7,000.00 US! Go back and read some of the comments written about the 305 when it first came out and you will read the same complaints about the 305 then as you read about the 705 now. Cost to much, not professional, no one will buy it, not as good as...blah blah blah. If you don't like it don't buy it. I have been using the 300 since 2012 and still love it. I have taken it to many places including Alaska, The Pantanal, three trips to Africa and just recently the Atacama desert in Chile and Patagonia. It has NEVER failed me and NEVER lost a clip!! Bob

[@nicholasolivas317]

Are you refferring to the Canon Cinema Camera C300?

[@RSafay]

​@@nicholasolivas317 Nicholas, I was referring to the Canon XF300. These were the same complaints people expressed when the Canon XF300/305 came out, and that was a very successful, professional camcorder.

[@BrasspineappleProductions]

" Spot on perfect review. Very professionally and coherent " I would consider buying this due to being a big Canon fan.

[@roverjerr3265]

What are u going to stream with a 7k usd cam? Heaven or Hell xD

[@LoudlabsNYC]

Show how it looks handheld or mounted on shoulder. Will one need an external shoulder rig or is that small rubber thing good enough?

[@DD-1971]

This is a camera from 2018, isn't it? How would this camera hold up today, on march 2021 against the competition? Have there been firmware updates that improved functionality ? Is the AF still sufficient? Or is it obsolete because of camera's like the Sony FX3 (with IBIS and perhaps better AF?) ? and the C70? I think many people would appreciate a new purchase decision making comparison in today's light. For example does it have "tap to track focus"? It seems very attractive.

[@itaku]

Feature wise it holds up and I personally like the footage it has a film look to it these newer cams have a digital look to them. Up to your preference I guess lol

[@WilliamOscarRodrigues]

Thanks for a great review. The camera you are shooting the video on is much sharper than the one you are reviewing.

[@RaymondToms]

Always love your reviews, clear, to the point and discuss issues beyond the spec sheet. One small detail that you picked on is not an issue with me. That extra record button on the left. Button real estate is scarce enough, so I would not add the button. Particularly as I have for many years, used a LANC controller on the tripod arm. Gives me on/off and beautiful slow zoom control, while leaving my left hand free to manually focus or do a crash zoom.

[@SewTubular]

So a camera with similar features to the JVC HC500 for twice the price. Let's see the HC500 has a longer zoom range, records 4K 50p/60p 10-bit 4:2:2 internal in ProRes LT format, can record to dual SD cards or an internal m.2 SSD drive, has HDR and LOG profiles, 12 stops of dynamic range like the GH5 does, but costs half as much as the X705. Tough choice here...

[@absolutemotionvideoNY]

I'm a canon guy (never been a fan of the image quality/color out of JVC cameras), but will certainly be looking into the HC500 to compare.

[@SewTubular]

@@absolutemotionvideoNY I was a big Canon fan up until 2012 when I switched completely over to Panasonic. The only issue I had in the past with JVC cameras was their dynamic range, but it looks like the HC500 won't have any issues with DR. Shooting 4K 10-bit 4:2:2 is a huge upgrade in image quality over 8-bit 4:2:0, so I'm not too concerned about color, and at HALF the price of the XF705 it would be very hard to justify buying the Canon camera. And then there is the m.2 internal SSD drive, where you can buy 1TB for $135 US and these drives capture at 2 times the speed of the best SD cards. ( SanDisk Extreme Pro 128GB SDXC 300MB/s UHS-II U3 memory cards cost $210 US, so you would have to spend $1680 US to equal the storage space of ONE 1TB $135 US m.2 SSD drive that writes at 530MB/s )

[@ProAVTV]

I am really looking forward to using the JVC HC500, you get a lot of features for the money. They are still very much in preproduction phase at the moment but as soon as they have a model which they are happy is of final quality I will definitely be taking a look. Carl

[@illdaddyrod]

How does this compare to the new Sony Z280? They are in the same price range. Is this a fair comparison? The low light of the Sony is phenomenal. Would love to see some low light footage from the Canon, especially indoors. Any chance for a head to head comparison video? Thanks.

[@SewTubular]

@@illdaddyrod It would be interesting to see a head to head comparison of the XF705, Z280, and the HC500. Shooting both indoors and outdoors, and especially with high contrast lighting.

[@MarshallCant]

I agree with @Ryan Eskalis. I'd love to see an updated review of the XF705. I am torn between the C200 (yes, in 2020) and this unit. Would love to hear what you guys think.

[@GenieLampStudios]

The XF705 looks impressive but the extra optical zoom in the JVC HC500 for 20 x is more helpful. Why did Canon not improve the zoom range on the XF705?

[@KeithsTVHD1]

Jvc is coming out with a new cam in January 18 that can record directly to SSD drive.

[@ask-televisionmartingremme9253]

I am filming with the 705 but your pics are all a bit light!

[@simongentry]

Carl - comparing with z280?

[@dangruner5926]

Absolutely love the 705 which I purchased from you guys back in June. Future proof and perfect for the kind of work my business is involved with - event recording, live streaming and corporate. Can see myself getting another 705 any time now. Also own a couple of XF 400's and ME200S-SH :)

[@anonymissed3611]

Do you find the zoom smoothness similar to xf400? Autofocus good? Do you use a remote zoom controller?

[@norfilmshetland]

Nice, detailed run through. Thanks!

[@ProAVTV]

Glad it was of use! Dan

[@rodneymcgiveron]

At least you know you can film black holes with it ..Proven by filming in England especially in winter .Great camera ...great review .

[@igorpanchenko3512]

woaw. This shot from 2:42 looks like jungle panorama from stratosphere. Btw, very solid camera to work with

[@fergus.hammond]

You mentioned that you transcoded H.265 to ProRes. What application did you use for that?

[@MartyJM01]

Hey guys. Quick question. Just received a new XF705 but not able to use the footage due to FCP & Prem not being able to handle the files as yet. How did you process the video files to produce this video? Thanks. Marty

[@ProAVTV]

We used resolve to convert the H.265 footage to prores Carl

[@ProjectOverseer]

Though I'm using an FS7/FS7 II most of the time, I often use the old Canon XF305. Within its range it offers great HD for ENG work. I like this new Canon as a run & gun easy to use camera - with 4K and C-Log3 ... WOW! I love my Sony FS7 but its not really an easy (light) setup. I'm always dragging a ton of kit to shoots, this camera just makes it easy for certain kinds of content, and capable in most areas if needs be. I will look into this new XF with interest. Negatives ... The price maybe as competition is pretty hot atm.

[@daltonrandall4348]

I find it interesting that live camera shooters have any interest in C-log. Agree the 305 is a fantastic piece of kit!

[@ProAVTV]

I think this is one of the best options around right now for "run and gun easy to use cameras" like you say. The Z280 is its main competition really, and that is only a few hundred pounds less. I'll be comparing both at some point soon. Carl

[@daltonrandall4348]

@@ProAVTV Very interesting - in the USA, the difference between the Sony and the Canon is only $49 (which is basically nothing when compared to the overall price of the two cameras).

[@ProAVTV]

@@daltonrandall4348 Interesting. Both use fairly pricey batteries, but the Z280 uses SxS cards which are much more than SD cards Carl

[@javierpuchetovich3307]

why not the Sony PXW-Z280 ?? maybe is a better camera than canon.

[@stormspotterdavidS]

I told My dad to get two of the Canon XF705 Professional Camcorder because at University of Wisconsin- Whitewater technology surplus sale for 5 dollars for my 20th birthday.

[@tjdalyvideo]

Excellent review thank you! Can't wait to hear what you think about the Panasonic CX350 and compare / contrast with this Canon gear. Looks like a very similar set of features. So exciting to have options like this! Thanks again, TJ

[@ProAVTV]

Had a brief play with a CX350 and it looks great so far. Will definitely be doing a video on it once there is a preproduction model which is suitable Carl

[@ailtvonline3121]

Thank you for your detailed review of the Canon XF705 what I would really like to see is short documentary or short film shot on this camera

[@MrJacobCastro]

Can't agree more with all the comments about comparing mirror-less cameras with camcorders, I really honestly think people forget or are unaware that camcorders are responsible for most of what they see on TV. Also, I'd rather have an all in one camcorder then be limited to the lens I can afford; that not always has the most flexibility and all the accessories I'd have to buy just for simple features like professional audio inputs and ND filters. Camcorders just make sense. But you don't see them as often on KZbin because so many people are obsessed with mirror-less cameras, of which I have no idea why. They're expensive, cumbersome, lack so many professional features and become outdated really fast. While a lot of TV production and news stations use the same camcorders for upwards of five years or more before buying a new one. In regards to the XF705, I think its VERY overpriced and the video quality just does not justify that high price tag. I've been looking at the JVC-GYHC500 and I'm probably going to buy it when it's finally released. Its cheaper but doesn't seem to lack any features or quality. A much better deal in my opinion. My first choice however was the Panasonic S1H, but after putting together all the things I was going to need just to use it(which totaled $6,000)The JVC camcorder just made a lot more sense. Its $3,500 and only needs a SSD and the caddy to use it with the camera. All together I'm looking at $4,500. I think camcorders need more attention on KZbin, thanks ProAVTV for doing this review. We need more of this. Hopefully you guys can do a review about the JVC camera, I'd love to see that!

[@EytschPi42]

Nice job, thanks!

[@DanielSRosehill]

Great review - thank you!

[@simonreeve6773]

Great and thorough review Carl. Thank you.

[@PeterFritzWalter]

As you encourage questions, how about footage quality compared to the Canon XA11? I know the question sounds almost ridiculous given the totally different market segment of these two camcorders. Let me tell you that I had the same kind of question regarding photography, and I went for the Canon 5D after various consumer cameras. I never regretted the choice, had first the Mark II, then upgraded to the Mark IV. But my problem is with video. I find it really counter-intuitive to shoot video with an SLR, to a point it gets me off any inspiration for a good video. That is why I am looking at a dedicated video cam again. Thank you!

[@cinemajim]

Thanks for a great first look! How's the IS on that lens? I love the IS on the XF400. How does this compare?

[@favournjoku3024]

I have a question about this camera. Is it really good in low-light situations? And how is the zoom on it? Is this a good option for venues like a church? Or is there a better camcorder in 2024 for church use?

[@avarmadillo]

Nice presentation, Carl--as always. A simple question or two. How easy might the LCD be to see in bright sun? Has a hood been provided for that as an accessory. Next, how bearable is the EVF to use? My experience is they aren't all that good on camcorders. How well would it do in low light with only a super 16 sensor? Which leads me to the next logical question: dynamic range?

[@rustichunterproductions2660]

Great coverage on your thoughts as usual. Any news or rumours on the replacement for the XF200 .... XF500 possibly?

[@annekedebruyn7797]

It's funny to see people claiming Canon is out of touch and than compare or even recommend an FS7 or URSA mini. This camera is clearly not for you/your work and yes it's priced very well. I wouldn't even dare to bring a HC500 to Afghanistan or other rough areas. The 305 has been a literal battle proven camera and I am sure that this camera for as far as I got to test it will too. As for 1 inch sensor debate, the average ENG setup is worth double that of an Arri Alexa. Gonna complain about that as well?

[@Rivenworld]

Love the 305, currently have the XF200 which is great for field work and I like the fact it uses 2 x CF cards AND records at the same time in MP4 to an SD card, that is pretty awesome, love the look of this... Now, where's the money...

[@Elmercuaton]

What i notice is the built in LCD monitor is small for that size body and i prepared to see SQD not sd card. the price is reasonable the quality of the video is good but if you try to look at it there is something soft area, anyway over all is good video cam.

[@absolutemotionvideoNY]

How does image quality and low light sensitivity compare to the XF400? Is it improved or the same (I'm guessing it's the same sensor).

[@andrewn1951]

What's the clicking on the audio at around 13:24...and again later? Artifact, or internal?

[@imdmilo]

Had a chance to play with this at Camerimage recently, Lovely piece of kit with some truly solid dual pixel autofocus like the other cameras from Canon, ergonomics felt well balanced too. Just wish I could afford it now...

[@ProAVTV]

I really enjoyed shooting with it. One of the best fixed lens camcorders on the market at the moment in my opinion Carl

[@imdmilo]

We were using it on the convention floor and were super impressed with how fast it focused in on people and how generally stable it felt in the hand with the IS on, sure it will become a workhorse in corporate/short docs

[@randyburleson]

With the Ethernet connection , is it NDI compatible?

[@iacovos]

I hope they implement this codec on the C200.

[@daltonrandall4348]

Canon have said they will not in the C200, but to expect it in future models they release.

[@ProAVTV]

I believe it needs a H.265 encoder built into the cameras hardware, I may be wrong? If that is the case then it wont come to any existing cameras Carl

[@iacovos]

@@ProAVTV Ok, thanks Carl.

[@KevinMullarkey]

Can it record 4K @50fps in all the HDR modes internally?

[@alex26i]

Canon I stuck with you for years....years.. too many old people making choices for your company. 4K. WOW canon finds out years later what it means. Too late, really who is in charge there..

[@activatehalo7763]

IKR. They are years late to the party. 'Hey guys, we got 4K! Amazing right?!'

[@jonnymelker1540]

Hello, is there after half a year, finally, a way to process Mac OSX this fabled new H.265 HEVC codec from Canon? Is not very customer friendly from Canon .....

[@avarmadillo]

Get Editready and transcode to Pro Res. Transcode is relatively quick, files look great and are easy to edit.

[@CaravanMovies]

35mm equivalent means this is not a full frame camera sir or what does it mean plz sir ?

[@TheSingingCelebrant]

forgive what may be stupid questions. Is it possible to use this to do a 'Live Feed' - Not as in to Social Media but live as in film the performer on stage and relay that to a Big Background screen. Think concert venues etc? If it is possible, how please and what cables would be required? Thank you in advance.

[@MrZedfour]

Hi Carl, I have a question that no one else has asked ( that i can see ) but what is the clicking sound between 2:10 and 2:52 please?

[@alevi9340]

Looks like the cap of the camera shake it for the wind that noise, same one make my camera when i`m not hold it apart...i think so

[@ppiddy9862]

Nice review, thanks and love the camcorder. Certainly look forward to your Sony PXW Z190 review and this camcorder compared to the Sony PXW Z280. This may be worth breaking the bank over!

[@oren.kirschenbaum]

too bad you didn't show any footage from indoors in low light situation. this cam has a small sensor and it would have been very interesting to see how it performs.

[@gmark45yahoo]

How good is this camcorder in low light. What is the f-stop of the fix lens?

[@alfredrobertsonjr7317]

Is this a good camera to use for mobile units? like for a van/truck? and is it weather resistent?

[@EdTrainerTv]

Hello, congratulations for the channel, it is a place of reference. I raise a question: if you could choose, for a KZbin channel, to buy a video camera, which one would you choose between the Canon c 200 and the Canon XF705. Taking into account the image quality, functions, handling and similar prices. Thank you for your proposals.

[@alevi9340]

If i'd make video for you tube i wuold do it with a phone and a gimball that's all you need...

[@EdTrainerTv]

Alevi thanks for the suggestion 👍

[@ТарасГалишко-х9ц]

What do you think, which better - sony z190 or canon xf705?

[@scottlarson8090]

Premiere opens H265 if you're on High Sierra or above

[@miss-sagittarius]

I’m just looking at how amazing the quality is, like a movie or music video. Would anyone recommend for my dance covers?

[@Nelson1000Sonrisas]

I am hesitating buying a canon camcorder again, because I bought a canon vixia hf s21 8 years ago I paid 1,300 and when I went to a parade in Manhattan 2018 I recorded for 4 hours, when I get home and I turned on my camcorder I saw a purple horizontal lines on the lcd I visited canon's website they say: "Please be advised that repair service is no longer available for this product". I feel disappointed.

[@mcddetectrespect.7467]

Thanks for the great reviews, do you know if canon are still producing the xf 400 series as it’s not on there web site anymore, a few other sites have also taken it down. Thanks.

[@HEALINGTHEWOUNDS]

As there is still no Canon H265 support for Adobe Premiere CC, I've had to purchase a Ninja 5 to get 4K footage. Can you please update a video of the XF705 using the Ninja 5 (tutorial) until the H265 is at last been updated by Adobe, we, and future users of the XF705, buyers need support to use the XF705.

[@kevinhelmer2312]

As always you and your team are very timely and informative. It's nice to see Canon leaning into the future on some specs with their video products. Canon can make solid products, but I stopped buying them because I fall into the hobbyist/pro-consumer category Thanks for the video! - CHEERS from NJ

[@amanieux]

how does a pro 1" camcorder such as this compares with a a7III (image quality only ) ?

[@formattester6]

Canon XF705 vs new Panasonic AG CX 350? opinions? im thinking about the CX350 escpecially as its almost 1/2 the price of this camera.

[@peterkelley7254]

I do have a question: size-wise, do you see canon coming in with a smaller version of this camera, to perhaps "next gen" the XF200/205 in the way that this did to the 305? I've been shooting with the 205 for a few years, and I've got specific needs, and it's almost perfect for me in a number of ways, size being the main one. I do 90% handheld, and I need the "mid-sized" body of the 200-205. My main complaints are its very small sensor (leading to sub-par low light performance) and the lack of a manual HD filter. And the XF400/405 seemed so plug-n-play, consumer oriented that it was a huge disappointment (that horrific eyepiece seems to have been added only begrudgingly). Thanks!

[@DaniloDelTufo]

Hi Carl, nice review! I'd like to know if in HD at 120fps the autofocus works (c200 doesn't), and what do you think about the image quality comparing to C200? From the images looks very similar, I own a C200 and it's not a run and gun camera, you know. How is comfortable using the camera with just one hand? Thanks!

[@ProAVTV]

I'm afraid I didn't test AF in 120fps, I will next time I get my hands on the camera I think the image will hold up very well against the C200, its probably better than the MP4 side of the camera to be honest. Its to big a camera to use with one hand.. you'd need an XF405 for that. One hand and rest it on your shoulder maybe? Carl

[@DaniloDelTufo]

@@ProAVTV Thanks, I really like the short footage that you've shot, I think it shows a good image between the Mp4 and RAW of the C200, the XF405 footage it's not so convincing to intercut the C200 I think, I'm waiting for more tests. Do you know when the XF705 will be out? Canon says December, I'd like to know more about it, at the beginning of the next month or at the end? Thanks again! Have a nice day! :-)

[@jomh832]

What kind of camera you guys recommend me .since I'm just starting I'm going to used it for church

[@MattGrover]

I was never a fan of the XF305, but the specs on this are certainly interesting and is on the list as a possible upgrade to my current kit. Would be good if you're able to do a run through of the new JVC models as well.

[@ProAVTV]

Definitely will be taking a look at the JVC HC500 when it is ready. Cameras are still preproduction units at the moment that don't record. Carl

[@MattGrover]

@@ProAVTV Cool, will look forward to watching that!

[@bobuk5722]

Hmm, beginning to think I bought the wrong camera! For those worried about the cost that auto focus is worth a small forune. BobUK.

[@ProAVTV]

Remind me which camera you use Bob? Carl

[@bobuk5722]

@@ProAVTV C200 and XF400

[@tdcattech]

I'd prefer the PXW-Z280 over this. Smaller sensor(s) and very expensive media but nicer in many other ways. Just my opinion...I can't afford either so not to worry. :-(

[@robertbrass2292]

some of the reviews coming in on the XW-Z280 that camera are not good, soft edges on wide angle mode, barrel distortion ,1 hr battery life. would like your thoughts, Im between the z280 and this cannon

[@NUCLEARARMAMENT]

The PXW-Z280 is like a UHD version of the FHD PMW-300, which in turn was an improvement over the CineAlta PMW-EX3/EX1. The thing is, none of these camcorders mentioned feature a true global shutter, but instead feature faster-than-average rolling shutters. The fixed lenses on the PXW-Z280 is also not going to deliver you UHD (3840x2160) resolution onto those Exmor R 1/2" CMOS sensors, as in order to do that, your lens would require a resolving power of 266 lp/mm (533 l/mm). Now, do you really think Sony would be able to put a lens like that onto a camcorder under $10,000 like the PXW-Z280?

[@betacam22]

where is the xlr audio input? tks

[@hvxcolors396]

Thank you so much for your very professional reviews. Do you maybe know why Canon never went for prores and ssd's? Canon has over the years pushed all kind of media but I see that in reality a lot of these Atomos recorders are used because it is just so convenient to have footage ready in prores 422. It would be so much more convenient if canon could provide this kind of solution just like JVC did with the GY-HC550. That camera costs half of the xf705 so it cant be because of licence costs.

[@mrinalgayali]

Did you record the test video in HD mode instead of 4K? The 4K resolution doesn't look like as in Sony NX80 on my 4K monitor. Is it possible to record 4K in full sensor readout? The cam looks solid, let's see others review on the 4K performance. I hope Canon didn't mess up like GX10, XF400 etc.

[@ProAVTV]

Canon cameras as a whole are not as sharp as the Sony ones straight out of the box. Sony add sharpening as a default and Canon don't. If you want some sharpening though you can add it in the menus Carl

[@bashmedia]

hi , how to record HLG and PQ in the same time ? thanks

[@josephsardone8971]

Can this camera perform Interval Recording ... recording short clips with audio at 1, to 1.5, to 2 seconds long, at one minute intervals? ... and does this camera record 4K at 60 frames per second? Thanks, and great review!

[@wisher77]

Hey new to camcorders, what kind of mounting mechanism does this use to connect to a tripod? Is it a standard 1/4" mount? Can't seem to find the specs anywhere

[@tm4tare]

Would love to have this camera just wish it wasnt so expensive!

[@ProAVTV]

It is priced for the features it has. This is a full broadcast quality camera. It's only real competition at the moment is the Sony z280 and that is only a few hundred pounds less. Carl

[@MuwexTech]

Does it has internal ND-filter?

[@FirstLast-il6ok]

Yes it does.

[@MetaltManiac]

Haych dot two six five. I shiver every time he says ‘H’ (coming from Texas, I’m sure others shiver at me saying y’all)

[@fakingbacksunday5370]

Do you still have the camera? Would love to have/or see walking shots, 24fps shots. I don't believe any of the shots are 24fps. Image quality looks good. I am sure it looks horrible in low light. Pricey!

[@ProAVTV]

We don't i'm afraid. I don't think it will do too bad in low light. I'll test next time I get a chance, we don't still have the camera i'm afraid. Theres only a few demo units in the country and they are very much in demand! Carl

[@モンスターキングドラゴン]

初めまして！XF705のカメラを初めて使用したので見に来ました。とても扱いやすかったです。

[@ericrodriguez4090]

Why is the image so soft? It seems like all the detail is lost. Is this your choice in post?

[@bashmedia]

how can you recored 2 files sdr and hdr hlg at same time ???

[@s.tsybenko]

How does the Canon XF705 differ from the Canon XF405, if you do not take into account the price and weight?

[@ProAVTV]

The Codec, the quality of the lens and the physical controls. Those are the main differences. Carl

[@TheFandangovideoguy]

@@ProAVTV I want to replace my ancient Canon XF300 and XF100 but I don't know if I like the XF400 (not in the same league as the XF300) and the XF705 is too much for me... but I need a camcorder for live events etc -I have a Canon 90D and a C100 mk2 for other more relaxed events...is the picture quality of the XF705 so much better than the XF400? I see a new Canon Xa50 which is similar to the XF400...any good? gosh...so hard to find good camcorders nowadays. I have DSLRs already...thanks

[@Stanlyok]

I'm personally using h.265 codec for 2 years already, and since last year it's fully supported by FCPX and 10bit version edits just fine. 8bit version edits better on newer computers (not necessary powerful, but new).

[@daltonrandall4348]

The Canon XF variant isn't yet supported. They are in talks with Apple to include it, however.

[@Stanlyok]

@@daltonrandall4348 so it's a widely used codec, just a proprietary version? Future-proof?

[@daltonrandall4348]

@@Stanlyok Right, it's in a wrapper of some sort. I won't profess to be an expert on that, I just know it isn't "native" in any NLEs right now except the two that Carl mentioned. That is accurate.

[@ProAVTV]

You might be confusing codec and wrapper. This is a H.265 codec inside a .MXF wrapper The more common kind of H.265 in Go pro's, streaming etc. is in a .MP4 or .MOV wrapper It should be relatively simple for apple, adobe etc. to give support. So hopefully should happen soon. Carl

[@Stanlyok]

@@ProAVTV having access to manufacturers representative will it be possible for you to make a video explaining why do some brands come up with unnecessary proprietary solutions? And if there are any benefits that are really worth it? BMD cameras get so much attention just for the streamlined tech - menus, codecs, interfaces. Why won't others learn from that? Just imagine the success of C200 with BMD menues and codec options.

[@KTHKUHNKK]

Yes very nice review. You covered all areas of this camera. Keith Kuhn

[@streetfoodyummy86]

How much is the price of this camera???

[@BB-tv6mb]

Hi There. Fanstastic review.

[@cobrandit]

FYI the XF705 has begun shipping in the US. Here's my unboxing video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ3PqmmOaZ2dftk

[@exposure9rahulmanephotography]

i want to see event shoot on this camera can u plz make a video for me

[@troyphillips1077]

Thanks for the good videos.

[@ProAVTV]

No problem, thanks for watching Carl

[@nick8925]

Haych.265 is great!

[@artistjoh]

So, I have been using the Panasonic DVX200 for two years now. Very similar features as this Canon and similar price to the JVC HC500 but with the great advantage of a four thirds sensor meaning better low light capabilities and shallower depth of field. So, I have been in Canon’s future of cameras for a couple of years already? Give me a break, canon is producing the past of camcorders, making a press release that suggests that it is somehow ‘new’ and futuristic, putting double the price of the competition on it, and this review lauds it as the next big step? It is nice that Canon is using H265. It is nice that Canon is finally trying to catch up, but at the cutting edge of where camcorders are going it certainly is not. Time to look at other camcorders that are really leading the way rather than listening to the spin from Canon.

[@I-sed-no]

Whoa! You lost me at $7000!