The Case for an Alternative Cosmology, Jayant V. Narlikar

[@PhysicsNative]

Outstanding talk. The text referenced is difficult to find, and if one wants a job in astrophysics these days, one had better not mention QSSC. However, there are enough problems with SBBC that alternatives are necessary to consider, and the science is not “settled.” That flock of geese Narlikar mentions at the end is a true problem in physics and cosmology.

[@sharadvishwas1671]

Very Nicely ecplained Alternative cosmology subject Sir

[@abdulwakeel4565]

Great to c this legendry old man.

[@PhilosopherRex]

Great talk - good to see that not all cosmologists are geese (in reference to the ending).

[@durgadasdatta7014]

Balloon inside balloon theory was published in year 2002.

[@seekerdroid]

Speedup 1.25 and have a good cosmic treat

[@GregJay]

We live in an Electric universe- Thunderbolts project.His accent isn't that bad, much better than most credit cards customer service phone people.

[@luchisevera1808]

This theory is physically nothing in comparison to EU, at best it shows that a creation process of planets happens in highly dense regions but doesn't even explain why, nor does it predict anything. It also predicts a steady state model but then shows that the universe is still expanding, when in fact matter is expanding, not the boundary of the universe. A lot of fluff, but he did do some work before in regards to citing and analyzing BBT, he just can't make a theory. The EU model on the other hand is entirely consistent and explains all of these scenarios with evidence to boot

[@jimmydunne7399]

His explanation is too difficult to understand. He should use clearer,simpler language.

[@illogicmath]

I agree with you

[@illogicmath]

It's painful. He should have brought a graduate student speaking a better English and let him give the talk