Sat in an sr22 recently. I would compare it to a Mercedes CLS 4 door coupe. It’s damn nice inside.
@melgelderman2 жыл бұрын
Do you know what year it was?
@kevinbarry712 жыл бұрын
Wait, over 8000 of the SR22s, and in combination with the earlier model, 7600? That doesn't make any sense
@patthepilot2 жыл бұрын
I started my training in this Plane, what a machine! Too much for me to be honest... transitioned to the piper warrior until I get my PPL. Anyways, great video!
@clarencehopkins78322 жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff bro
@karrpilot70922 жыл бұрын
I have yet to see one available for rental. But if one does become available, I am sure it will be for well over $200.00 an hour...
@matthew14642 жыл бұрын
Thx for ur vids (:
@ditto19582 жыл бұрын
Cessna should not have tried to do a low wing competitor. They should have made a modern (composite) high wing plane. I like the performance of a Cirrus, but I prefer high wing planes. Cessna still makes and sells 172 and 182 planes. Piper doesn’t make Cherokees any more.
@mikecournoyer2 жыл бұрын
Cessna tried. It was the Cessna 400 (Ttx) but they stopped making it in 2018 because of low sales.
@jsteiger22282 жыл бұрын
Sports car analogy? Sure, but without retractable gear and a manually controllable propeller, it's more of a "GT car with an automatic transmission" than an enthusiast's car.
@TheReadBaron912 жыл бұрын
Both of those were done by design, keep it simpler, mechanically and operationally
@jsteiger22282 жыл бұрын
@@TheReadBaron91 It'd be weird if it wasn't
@TheReadBaron912 жыл бұрын
@@jsteiger2228 I guess I meant more on purpose than by design. Not like they were forced to do it that way
@kevinbarry712 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as a Lamborghini style door. You probably mean to say, gullwing
@hugoglenn97412 жыл бұрын
There is such a thing a Lamborghini style door and a gull wing style door hinges from the top (as in the Mercedes 300sl) from 50s and early 60s
@carbuyer39592 жыл бұрын
I stopped watching after he said "well-equipted".
@wagnertenor2 жыл бұрын
WHAT????
@DonStegall2 жыл бұрын
Glad I'm not the only person that heard that. Kinda like orientated ... Although there is no real difference in meaning or function between the two words, there is clearly a better choice, and that is oriented. Oriented is a more straightforward, clear word form, and Garner's Modern American Usage calls orientated a needless variant.
@jononioo28572 жыл бұрын
Hahahah.... I'm dead. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@snotnosewilly992 жыл бұрын
Too much plane for many pilots?????? There have been a large number of crashes in the SR-22s. Most due to pilot error.
@hugoglenn97412 жыл бұрын
Substantive Reduced brake wear from taxing, really? At 10-20 mph. You know Kinetic energy is 1/2Mass X Velocity squared. So what your saying is landing at 80-100 mph squared is a small number compared to 10-20 mph taxiing squared. Must be millennial math.
@kevinbarry712 жыл бұрын
In my opinion diamond makes better aircraft. Much more modern engines, with single lever Power control, and of course they are retractables. And you can have single or twin engines.
@WoodDuckProductions2 жыл бұрын
I’ll say it…the Cirrus honeycomb seats are rather uncomfortable after 2 hours of flying..172 seats are much more comfortable
@johnhagen312 жыл бұрын
Equipted? Cessana? This is so bad it's embarassing
@cyrouskhavari9692 жыл бұрын
Dont you think, its little bit of exsaduration, calling it the Meecedes of the sky?? 😂🤣 far from it. If anything that is even being close to Mercedes of the sky, is the Beech A36, in my humble opinion! I would never pay that kind of money for a SR 22. sorry !