The Corporate State: The History Of Corporatism (Part 2)

[@plolsteg7705]

In the netherlands, the “polder model” is basically a form of natural corporatism. The fact that the country is under constant threat of sinking makes it necessary for all social and economic classes to work together. As a result, Dutch corporatism is much more of a philosopy than an economic model.

[@DarthDread-oh2ne]

Hello, Lavader. I just got done watching A two-hour long video on Wilhelm II of Germany.

[@majidaljaburi7870]

What are your thoughts on Wilhelm ii now after watching the video?

[@DarthDread-oh2ne]

@@majidaljaburi7870 My thoughts haven't changed A bit. I think the former Kaiser was dealt.

[@Falkenlp3]

@@DarthDread-oh2nedealt?

[@avo.avocado]

Glad you’re making videos on corporatism that are easy to understand. I haven’t decided to be a corporatist but im researching it. Also love the b roll footage of Atlanta in the intro, so many beautiful sky scrapers, Love and respect from Georgia ❤

[@maxzation]

16:00 Isnt Rerum Novarum considered Distributist?

[@mikkelbjerring2914]

Yes, but this doesn't exclude it from being Corporatist as well.

[@robertortiz-wilson1588]

​@mikkelbjerring2914 yes!

[@robertortiz-wilson1588]

These two videos are so underrated! Thank you for making them!

[@DjDeadpig]

My home country of England 100% needs corporatism right now.

[@williamjohansson8105]

Nordic corporatism is to capitalist. When the power of the capitalists is opposed even the slightest they bribe politicians, initiate mass privetization etc. State syndicalism or a form of socialism based on the organic state is the only way forward if the european race and working class is to even survive the century

[@ascalonian]

Hello? The corporation of the city of London?

[@Jesserocks1975]

Well, you would have had it had you elected Sir Oswald Mosley.

[@DjDeadpig]

@@Jesserocks1975 Mosley would’ve ruined us and become a bitch for the axis. The same way I wouldn’t vote a commie in, I wouldn’t vote a simp in.

[@Heinrich-k1u]

@@Jesserocks1975with Mosley we might have had racial discrimination, so nooo… I want a patriotic corporatism, but that doesn’t yapp about „blood and honor“ and shit like that

[@Heinrich-k1u]

When part 3

[@Ditmike2235]

Thankful for this video

[@Coolbeansoooo83799]

Based. We will restore Corporatism as the global economy of the world, we will be righteous and prosperous!!!

[@alessandroboccalatte8120]

You forgot the first comparison in history of politics to the human body, Agrippa Menenius Lanatus in the early republic, he went to the plebeians who were refusing to fight for the state. He compared the state to the body, and so convinced them to fight

[@grecko8762]

JD Vance may be somewhat Corportist when judging his past interviews etc

[@yaujj65]

Like music, corporatism is everywhere.

[@RighteeTighty]

To Lavader This maybe adding to much to your plate, but can you talk about Alexander Hamilton / Henry Clay / Friedrich List / Lincoln / Prez Mckinley, the American (National) System & their parallel to Corporatism

[@martysmaps7411]

Honestly I think corporatism could use a different name just on account of it makes people think of uber-capitalism. Corporation might be a word which adequately described corporatism 80-140 years ago, but now people just have a different connotation for the word corporate. The first word that comes to my mind that has a modern definition better than corporate would be synergy. So I think corporatism could attract more people if it was called synergism. What do other people think would be a good replacement word if one is needed?

[@hofnarrtheclown]

If the Inherent Meaning of Corporatism's grasply Understood, any Change isn't Needed in the Long-Term.

[@martysmaps7411]

@hofnarrtheclown corporatism can't even be concerned about the long-term until it can at least off the ground again, and it would benefit in the short term with a name change to fit modern culture without hurting the long term

[@MahmudHasan-me]

​​@@martysmaps7411I think co-operatism could be a good name. But how do we saction it by use?

[@hofnarrtheclown]

​@@martysmaps7411We can't just Change a Millennium Organicism just for Wider Recognition.

[@AmericanImperium1776]

Long live Catholic Corporatism! Great video. Peace ✌🏻 After the series, can you do a video on Tsar Nicholas II? P.S. I thought National Syndicalism was very similar/the same as Corporatism.

[@berk3857]

You should see Eugene Golob's book -The "ISMS"-. It has the biggest chapter for corporatism and middle-way. Also you should look at Carl Landauer's book. Another source for corporate law theory comes from Leon Duguit who claims occupational representational order in terms of constitutional law theory of corporatism.

[@Coolbeansoooo83799]

Which book specifically are you referring to for Carl and Leon that speak on Corporatism? Thanks!

[@sibberianno6333]

Great video. I think it'd be interesting if you made a part of the series discussing the difference between corporatism and Keynesian capitalism. Many people (myself included before I started watching the series) think corporatism is just capitalism with a strong state, i.e., Keynesianism; and I think making a video about their difference would help clear a lot of doubts and attract further interest in corporatism as a truly distinct alternative to capitalism.

[@ezrafaulk3076]

Now that I've watched your introductory video on it *&* both parts of your miniseries on it, I'm dead convinced America *desperately* needs corporatism; systemic employee abuse & mass layoffs by CEOs against employees (who're being laid off because of the *CEOs'* stupid decision they're thrusting the consequences of onto *them* instead of accepting it *themselves* )in American capitalism is leading a lot of people to turn to socialism/communism, seeing it as the *only* alternative even though it's arguably even *worse* ; most Americans have never even *heard* of corporatism (& to my utter shame, I was one of them until I watched your videos on it), & those that have have only heard the *misinformation* surrounding it. But after watching your videos, I understand that corporatism is the *middle* ground system that leaves *everyone* happy (as long as it's not *fascist* corporatism), & as an American who's absolutely sick of all this *needless* polarization & strives to find a rational middle ground, I now firmly believe America absolutely *needs* corporatism.

[@MahmudHasan-me]

I Don't know what your party affiliation is. But some are saying that JD vance may have corpotist sympathies from his past interviews.

[@NorwoodingSkullMask]

Bring back the synthesis of the spiritual in every aspect of government and economics!

[@greenmountainbrownie6473]

PLEASE MAKE A COMMUNITY POST ABOUT THE CORPORATISM OF THE IRISH SENATE

[@ascalonian]

The City of London Corporation is a unique local authority that governs the Square Mile, the financial district of London. While it operates within the broader framework of the UK's legal and political system, its structure is distinct. The Corporation has elements of corporatism, with various committees representing different sectors and interests within the business community. However, it also incorporates democratic elements through elected representatives. The Corporation's functions encompass local government responsibilities, maintaining the City's infrastructure, and supporting businesses.

[@GluboiBoi]

Моя жизнь❌ Наши патриотические жизни✅

[@trinity03p]

Rerum Norvam mainly paved the path for Distributism, which it was (Correct me if wrong) supplemented by thinkers like Chesterton and others, The Outline of Sanity is an example.

[@KingJonasHD]

Since Dollfuß was a classical corporatist and thus way more conservative than revolutionary, would you consider him a fascist? His Austria was called austrofascist after all, but I‘m really having my doubts on that. I feel like he’s more of an authoritarian catholic nationalist than a fascist

[@nolancer5974]

Dollfuß and the Fatherland Front were not Fascist. You know where the term "Austrofascist" comes from? It was coined AFTER the Second World War by Social Democrats trying to slander Dollfuß and his party. Dollfuß nor the VF EVER described themselves as Fascist.

[@TuesdaySFD]

Fascism is revolutionary

[@chabeco]

He’s not.

[@daviokamoto2143]

he seems similar to franco... but mussolini was his best buddy so idk.

[@soymargarit2036]

Ojalá tuviéramos canales cómo el tuyo en hablahispana (solo conozco uno que es mas o menos parecido).

[@F.JuanPhan]

Giovanni Gentile would love your videos! 😅

[@floridaman318]

Excellent.

[@jacksonmowell3859]

Lavader do a video on why the American media panders to women so much.

[@DistributistHound]

I would integrate some components of corporatism with Distributism with social credit economics as foundation

[@vicenteromerovega1480]

You are the best ❤️❤️❤️

[@Faustobellissimo]

Corporatism, in the sense of tripartism, has NOTHING to do with Medieval corporations/guilds.

[@dannydanny865]

Interesting history on a niche ideology

[@Hruljina]

Merhaba, kako se muzika koja svira u pozadini zove

[@diegoyanesholtz212]

I do think liberal corporatism is better than the fascist variant. Liberal capitalism is not 100% bad, but if you allow companies to do whatever for profit, you can create social issues.

[@diegoyanesholtz212]

The only place in the 1950s where corporatism was rising was Latin America. They always say that Latin America is anachronic, and is always behind the rest of the world. This is with Peronism in Argentina and Varguism in Brazil.

[@yaujj65]

Does the Austrian Hungarian Empire practice corporatism?

[@horacioelconserjeopina3956]

Mist XVII-XIX monarchies were already mercantilist

[@berk3857]

NSPAD experience is corporatistic. I think you can look at Gerhard Kessler's work and some of corporatist-reactionary parties in late 19th century Austria. Also there is a book named "Austro-Corporatism: Past, Present, Future", it may answer your questions.

[@yaujj65]

@@berk3857 Thanks

[@timmyturner327]

The UK was pretty corporatist until Thatcher.

[@valentinkrajzelman4649]

the entirety of europe was, then neo liberals and social democrats, decided to literally destroy everything good, prosperous, rich and beautiful in europe

[@bobbyokeefe4285]

With Paul,it's actually the end of Corporatism ie-Hierarchy,there's a reason why Spengler was quoted as saying,"Christian theology is the grandmother of Bolshevism",it's the push for egalitarianism,this is even confirmed in the lifestyle of the 1st generation of Christians who lived as celibate groups in communes,sharing everything(that sounds more like Communism to me),a far cry from what the church would later on become as an institution(and this btw would later be one of Luther's main critique of the Church,hence the "Sola Scriptura"advocacy),Paul is speaking from a theological pov not a social one and certainly not from an economic one,remember Christianity is a failed apocalyptic cult,as far as Paul was concerned the world was about to end in the near futur,he's not planning a society for centuries to come(heck,not even years to come)so it's absurd to anachronistically put such concepts in his mouth.

[@Faustobellissimo]

"Classical corporatism"??? I understand that you're desparately trying to make a distinction between how corporatism was defined by the Christian social teaching and how it was applied by the Fascists regimes, but you can't make up new terms as you see fit...

[@thumperhunts6250]

What's the difference with monarchy?

[@agellidmalik]

A monarchy is a political structure, whereas corporatism is an economic structure. This, of course, means that they can be combined.

[@ChristianCollins-ux1zr]

I’m a capitalist supporter and always will be, but I’m willing to admit that corporatism is very appealing and maybe some elements of it can be used to prevent capitalism from growing out of control. However I have to say that corporatism’s association with Hegel is bad since Hegel essentially laid the foundation for the formation of not only Marxism, but also fascism and national socialism, through his pro contradiction anti-logical philosophy.

[@Kuudere-Kun]

How can you exclude Engelbert Dollfuss from your definition of Fascism, he self identified as Fascist and was backed by Mussolini?

[@nolancer5974]

Where did he say he was Fascist?

[@AmericanImperium1776]

Dollfuss called his system was a Catholic System and he even brought Mises into his government, although Mises was kicked out eventually.

[@eddy-knox]

I support all English speakers changing the way we pronounce 'gentiles' It sounds way zestier lavaders way 🌯

[@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723]

12:43....ughmmm......not really, correction there buddy,

[@TheXXDude]

let me tell you about something corporatism isnt the only Alternative to capitalist and socialism cuz if you ever heard of syndicates they literally operate the same way and method and then you have my political theory and practices called unionism where it abolish a 1 man system and builds a system of a round table of economic and government structure of 8 spaces which are sittings of 5 for 1 government and law making 2 military and law enforcement 3 business and economics 4 political figures 5 building civilization 6 land and avoculture 7 building economic and enterprises and government law enforcement or military and trade unions then finally 8 public education with all this a government of hierarchy of wealth and power is simply no more as thier wouldn't be a class of power nor wealth as everyone are expected the same for what thier specialty caters for thier need in the society and system that thierself can provide with whatever thier specialty of work is now how to get voted or the requirements to get elected in whatever sit you are running for you must make a paper documentation of a 5 year plan u are planning to bring to the nation and state and if thier was a case of you lets say not doing what you are promised of doing then you are kicked from the sit of what you been elected for now for the security of the nation we protect any belief in culture rather its sexually or religious or even gender identity as all are people and any form of people within the government is worthy of thier protection in rights now for business side of things fairly priced consumer goods big business and enterprises places to work to earn income and free employment union enterprises that share the wealth and opportunities to the lower income enterprises so they have the same privileges as the big business in opportunities and deals with other companies all this forms a fair place of practice thats strong but not authoritarian and most importantly a system that builds a machine that the masses and candidates of the round table can control through feedback and opinions from the you the individuals and the other thing is it holds wealthy businesses accountable for any wage cuts towards works by making them sit with the employees and make a deal with them to compensate the sudden wage cutting. Also if you wanna make a video covering what i said here you can

[@colinmcewen9530]

its basicaly fuedlism in a mordern setting

[@TheWayoftheSith]

Western civilisation is Faustian. Rome and ancient Greece are not Faustian. Neither is the Bible. Oswald Spengler talks about this. They are a different Pole than the west. Faustian means the quest for knowledge and greater meaning. Those civilisations where more concerned with status, order, auctoritas and power.