This series on antennas is the best I've found anywhere, please keep them coming! Really unlocking my understanding of some of these concepts I've only read about before. Thank you!!
@emviso3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I'm glad you like the videos!
@daviddahlgren96037 ай бұрын
Just Perfect , Really !
@joeymusaki2 жыл бұрын
Well, in a short Period of time to give all the necessary information, good Job done!!
@emviso2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@mba2ceo10 ай бұрын
Well done !!! Best explanation
@macmos13 жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@emviso3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@jayjay-gl4fj2 жыл бұрын
Good video!!!
@veronicanoordzee64403 ай бұрын
@ 2:56 With a target-frequency of 5 GHz the wavelength is 0.06 m. Thus, the half-wave dipole antenna is only 3 cm. long. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna#/media/File:Half_%E2%80%93_Wave_Dipole.jpg
@abhishekbhattacharya80222 жыл бұрын
Viva prep done. Thanks ma'am 😁
@emviso2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@JoyForStudies2 жыл бұрын
better than books. thank you
@emviso2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! Thank you for the feedback!
@Shafqat-TV5 ай бұрын
Does the charge concentrate at the ends or uniformly over the polar length?
@mo7annadgamer5485 ай бұрын
I love you
@engaya53293 жыл бұрын
Thanks, can you please explain transmission line model for microstrip antenna
@Frankh772 жыл бұрын
Is there an easy visual explanation of why an antenna being physically too short for a given frequency is iess efficient, but still able to generate a transmission on that frequency? Maybe a sinewave shown on graph and some kind of pushing force behind the wave (until the element ends, but the wave is still created beyond that point?)
@SergeySuper_Silver Жыл бұрын
I have a question: Can we connect the two ends of a dipole antenna with a wire which is set up along the dipoles? Thanks for the lesson!
@badgereclipse Жыл бұрын
Does anyone know how significant the gap in between the two poles is? For example, how big can this gap get before it has a negative consequential impact on the efficency of the antenna, and what those consequences be, as I assume this gap is included as part of the effective antenna length