I was one of those people who kept asking you for a definition of the demiurge, thanks for making this video
@mccabessupplementsandgym39132 жыл бұрын
@♜WhatsapMe +⓵⓷⓷⓻⓷⓽⓼⓼⓪⓽⓸ let's not 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
It's literally Santa Claus, but for grown ups. Es Papa Noel, pero para adultos.
@MonstersSeeMeToo2 жыл бұрын
I was a physics major and a philosophy minor and I definitely agree with what you said. There is zero respect paid to precartesian geometry, and I think it would be helpful in understanding advanced concepts in physics. I never got around to reading the Republic but I’ll do that now.
@AdilJustinTheriault2 жыл бұрын
Ken recommended a book last year that I think is a good starting point: The Theology of Arithmetic. Translated by Robin Waterfield. I am actually just making my way through it these days.
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
VIcente, deberías leer La República al menos 1 vez al año, y contrastarla con cada cosa que pasa en la realidad. Entenderas el mundo.
@absoluteflowstate69322 жыл бұрын
I do feel dumb sometimes when I watch your vids but I figure I'll just watch more of your videos and catch on, what I can comprehend so far has taught me things that open up wisdom that I consider priceless. Thank you ken.
@jb65462 жыл бұрын
I've done the same for a while now. Over time, you pick up some things.
@Paul_Marek2 жыл бұрын
While Ken’s vids certainly do offer massive educational value, they are also somewhat egoically _designed_ to make you feel dumb.
@jb65462 жыл бұрын
@@Paul_Marek yea,I've had an instinct on that. It could be just the ego at work or just how he views wisdom and how it must be earned. Or both I guess
@nighthawkviper67912 жыл бұрын
You're not going to understand the Secret Teachings of All Ages and Ancient Mysteries by listening to Ken's Exoteric explanations. You must yourself go on the journey of self-illumination to reach that capstone. Seeking the occult, or hidden, knowledge will be a reward in and of itself.
@Paul_Marek2 жыл бұрын
@@jb6546 ya, sometimes you need to embrace the egoism of another. While it has negative social value it’s positive value is that it _sometimes_ creates individuals who greatly excel at certain things. I usually try to find the 30 seconds of educational value in the 20 minutes of egoic dumping. “Pay attention to the message, not the messenger” kinda thing.
@corticallarvae2 жыл бұрын
Ken your such a wonderful example of mankind. You’ve become more concise and exact with experience.
@misternordberg36752 жыл бұрын
I would love to see Ken go on a rant against psychology. Would be epic.
@discountmike88562 жыл бұрын
Lol. He's so snarky.
@christophermackle34192 жыл бұрын
Ohh, yea we are following the works of Freud with textbook accuracy. He was a high level Satanist who invented the entity called the "ego" and look what good it did. Never mind the propaganda playbook
@krissykatportal2 жыл бұрын
Psychology in what way? Like people with mental disorders?
@unclesham55072 жыл бұрын
@@krissykatportal no... the retards at the desks. those are the real nuts.
@trains20572 жыл бұрын
So many comments missing from the reply section
@denzali2 жыл бұрын
Not waves in the water but “Of the water” principle and attribute. That bit was the unlock for this video. 👌🏻
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
Space, the final frontier 😎
@NotAnnaJones2 жыл бұрын
Electricity in the womb of magnetism?
@denzali2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 meant for me? I’ll go check this out anyway. 👌🏻
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Now try to wrap your head around rarifaction and compression, constructive interference and destructive interference.....ect 🤔 Waves of,due to, by what. The deeper down the rabbit hole you go the more it all comes together.
@spaceantelope14 ай бұрын
@@NotAnnaJonesthe womb of magnetism may be space. Electricity is the product of magnetism and dielectricity,, according to Ken anyway.
@hughthenasia55722 жыл бұрын
couldn't help but copy and paste the trasncript for this one, your ability to elucidate on these concepts is astounding
@DozenDeuce2 жыл бұрын
The first two numbers of the Fibonacci sequence are the binary 0 and1. Out of nothing 0, something 1. That is how you find two 1’s 0+1=1, only then can 1+1=2. 0 is the first number, not 1. If you doubt that, simply add 1 and subtract 1 from 0, and you see the truth. 0 is the first minute on the clock, the first hour of the day, the first year of your life, the conjunction of the XYZ coordinate. Think about the numbers 100-199 then change the beginning 1 on all of them to a 0 and you see 000-099 are the first 100 numbers. When 0 is added back in as the first number you can then have a perfect sequence of 0-9 over and over to infinity. Then once 0 is accepted as the first number, one can see that a -0 is possible for advanced mathematics as it is the beginning of counter-space, the mirror dimension, the æther.
@avatharbehemoth2 жыл бұрын
19:52 nah dewd. you may not have realized. but everytime you say something concrete (as culmination from the leadup) you a) mumble and b) say things really fast. which gives me the impression some part of you does want to be uberintelligent/have the admiration. just food for thought.
@askyourselfwhatdoyoureally35422 жыл бұрын
In regards to the magnet you used to stay away? Can it also help you sleep??
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
no, it doesnt do that
@ybl83772 жыл бұрын
Question: How does Mass (2) manifest before Magnitude (3)? Shouldn't the sequence be The One (1); the Aether (1) as the attribute of The One; then Magnitude (2) being a component or effect of the Aether dielectric manifest; and subsequently, at a certain intensity level beyond Gamma the dielectric condenses to Matter/Mass (3)? In other words, sequentially, Aether dielectric manifest yields phenomenal space (magnitude) and time before it actually yields matter/mass? So before Matter manifests, the measurements of space (magnitude) and time would pertain to the manifestation of dielectric vortices only?
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
A black hole is a mass with no magnitude.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 The dielectric has overthrown magnetisms ability to keep it in the visible universe. Yes. Conventionally called a black hole, better coined a dielectric overthrow phenomenon.
@ybl83772 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Thank you for your comment. I "imagined" The One to be more distanced and simply mirrored by the Ether. I put the question to Ken yesterday on live podcast who, if I understood his response, did not dispute the assertion that the Ether is The One as postulated by Monism. It's logical if one understands that the Ether is pure potential and by its dielectric manifest gives place to the whole of the phenomenal. So thanks again as this adds much clarity.😀
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Gravity is incoherent dielectric acceleration, non point source mutual mass acceleration. A magnet( an electrified dielectric object) is defined by point source dielectric acceleration and multiplicative not merely additive. Everything is pressure mediation.
@noelmckinney95592 жыл бұрын
What then is the difference between ontos and esse?
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
one is a composite of this world, the other is spirit and NOT of this world.
@noelmckinney95592 жыл бұрын
@@KenTheoriaApophasis So bob, sue, larry vs signal? That's not really what I want to say. I read the Periphyseon but it gives 8 different ways to look at being, and like most philosophy it negates itself in circles. It even gives being to shadow in one definition. Is the signal a universal substance? A unified field? Words seem to suck at this point...
@rttichnor2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
thank you so very much!
@Derbauer2 жыл бұрын
It's quite fascinating reading about the "Hypostasis of the Archons" In the Nag Hammadi.
@ricochet28802 жыл бұрын
That book is mind blowing in its concepts.
@ricochet28802 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Keep your opinions to yourself. If he found things enlightening in that book there is nothing wrong with that. That book you mention, "The Unknown God", at best gives a common sense approach to reality but is basic . The hypostasis of the Archons is way more deep and written in code. I don't see how you could view it as religious when your little notebook can be viewed as fantasy or a concept that you have adopted in your mind to help ease your fear of not understanding reality, a comfortable thought program you made for yourself. Go read the Black Sun by Stanton Marlan and gain some humility.
@witty4372 жыл бұрын
I love you bro. Not actually where we fully agree. But imlove hearing your take. Always. Bar none. You are genuine. Egg heads hooray!
@larryleger16582 жыл бұрын
So, the 'history' books tell us that the Gnostics deified the 1 & 1 or do you think it was misinterpreted?
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
The 1 & 1 is just an explanation, not the source of truth. We count because we have fingers.
@larryleger16582 жыл бұрын
@@inesvalenzuela4958 LOL! I'm aware that it's an analogy. 1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9 etc. But that didn't answer my question; was it DEIFIED? Or just a bad translation. BTW, thank you for the response(effort & time).
@EeAh9632 жыл бұрын
“Space; The Womb of Magnetism” You take on this topic, Ken, with such a balanced energy of logic and magic. I appreciate the language🤍🖖🏼
@Selderij2 жыл бұрын
What is this "no thing" in comparison to "nothing", and where can I read more about that viewpoint?
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Dierdre carbines book called The Unknown God hits the point home time and time again untill it's permanently stuck in your mind.
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
This presupposes that our universe and our existence is ‘all’ there is. To understand where the christian gnostics were coming from one would have to consider the possibility that this place is not all there is and that this place is a horror show from the perspective of what the gnostics called the pleroma. This is delineated in the Fall Of Sophia myths. So there is a long standing argument over whether this material universe is all that is or whether there are other dimensional realities. The second point of contention along these lines is the relationship between humans and the demiurge as viewed by christian gnostics. We view this as a toxic and abusive relationship. We also see the misery of humanity as evidence for flawed design. I do agree though that the demiurge was not viewed as negative in any other schools other than the christian gnostic ones, and there is disagreement even within the christian schools.
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
And just for fun: it was said there was an in-between place they called the KENOMA....This was where Sophia Achamoth was said to reside while the ongoing process of salvation from the fall carries on. But the salvation of man was made very complicated by the rape of Eve and the instantiation of hybrid archon/human bloodlines on earth because of that abuse. This is the primary clue that connects the idea of demiurge to the Torah.
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Go over to Bobby Collier’s GOOD GOD channel where he proves Marcion was right beyond all reasonable doubt. Yahweh is NOT the father of Christ. See my Judaism Is Egyptian Spirituality posts, too... I’m not a Buddhist I believe Buddhism to be another project of the international money masters. See Astle’s The Babylonian Woe.
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
Ultimately I agree with your last statement but the archon war god of Israel is not the Monad.
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Even the Samkhya school understood that MIND is of the demiurgic template. That spirit (Purisha) is comparable to Kant’s Noumena or ‘thing in itself’...This, in my view, ‘proves’ duality..DVAITA in the east and Christian Gnosticism in the west!
@andrewmarkmusic2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 I like the idea of ‘hyper-duality’...See my recent paper on Samkhya and Christian Gnosticism.
@Coisapreta123 Жыл бұрын
infinte insights mate... infinite...
@jt9990a2 жыл бұрын
I heading to Crete this early spring to work on the house in the village, I love sitting at the top of the mountain with the old timers just injoying the crazy movie we call life.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Consciousness comes from the words con "together" and Scio " to know". You can't have something that has a beginning in time and that is composite and superimpose that on the absolute. Forms, feelings,perceptions,impulses and consciousness, these are not the Self.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
It depends what you mean by ‘self’.They are a manifestation thus they are as real as anything else.Everything that exists is real,there is no greater or lesser real. So I would argue feelings,perceptions,ego etc ARE self and there’s no duality between this and ‘source’ - what some people refer to as ‘true self’.All is one.It’s quite beautiful really.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 I agree the ‘person’ we think we are is a construct of transitory feelings,memories,emotions etc.but it’s also real in that it exists.Everything that manifests is real,everything that’s real exists and everything that exists depends on everything else.Nothing can be removed from existence or added to existence because as you rightly say everything is one. Going back to your original comment I don’t disagree what you say about transient feelings etc not being the self,I’m just expanding on understanding in a wider context by saying although this is true on one level of thinking,on another level it’s also true that these things of shadow ARE ALSO part of who we are as a manifest human being,it’s not to be dismissed or derided but embraced.There is no duality.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
@@redpillnibbler4423 @Red Pill Nibbler a mirage is still a real mirage yes but the only refuge is the soul, wisdom and the soul are one in the same, objective negation leads to subjective synthesis. Forms feeling perceptions impulses consciousness these are not the Self the Soul. Pure gold is always pure but must be extracted from the host rock.Anything with a beginning in time has and end in time . Nothing comes from nothing but this is not to be confused with not a thing. That which is beyond the Cartesian universe in an ineffable way could not be found objectively.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Language and definitions are the finger pointing at the moon.The finger pointing at the moon isn’t the moon.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Firstly something cannot pop into existence or suddenly cease to exist,there is transmutation. Secondly Nothing can exist in isolation - nothing can have a beginning or an end,nothing can be measured or divided.The mind conceptualises such things as a means to explain what can’t be explained or for practical purposes in our corporeal existence. Everything depends on everything else,nothing can be removed or added,everything IS everything else.
@weinerdog1372 жыл бұрын
Worthwhile. As usual.
@oblivianation97592 жыл бұрын
KZbin is frustrating me lately. It will say 5 comments but only let's you see 2 of them. Is anyone else having this problem? It seems like censorship is going off the rails.
@shawnlinnehan73492 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking it's the spam weeded out. Hit me up on what's app.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
Exactly that happens to me all the time,it’s a recent thing. I wonder how many of my replies are blocked for others to read? I don’t think KZbin likes us very much 🥲
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 It’s not,my connection is very good,it’s to do with KZbin.
@oblivianation97592 жыл бұрын
@@redpillnibbler4423 they don't like the truth very much especially when it differs from the narrative.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@oblivianation9759 KZbin is awful really for freedom of speech but there are still some good channels.
@marrty7772 жыл бұрын
Is it another valid way of explaining the demiurge that may be more accessible to some that it is an out-picturing in consciousness (i.e., projection) as a result of realizing manifestation but misattributing it to something other than the absolute self? Or potentially intentionally projecting it as a means of working with manifestation itself (i.e., magic) in a convenient personality form? I suspect the gnostics understood this.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Everything is principal and attribute.
@marrty7772 жыл бұрын
Yes, then the principle is vibration and the attribute is any and all phenomena. People just tend to fixate on certain phenomena.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
@@marrty777 the absolute is ineffable. Objective negation to arrive at subjective synthesis is the only way.
@marrty7772 жыл бұрын
@@hughjones4430 I think we're just not speaking the same language. No worries.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 @Bob & Ann Nikola Tesla said If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." Ken wheeler did a video on this. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hnzEhoiclNpnopY The absolute dwells in an inaccessible light, the divine darkness. Everything is principal and attribute. Light and illumination, 1 and 1, everything is One. The release of energy leads to a vibration in the medium, so vibration would be the release of energy not energy itself which has no Cartesian coordinate, vibration would be the loss of inertia ie magnetism and Magnetism is merely the dielectric field. Everything is ultimately one. The absolute is not a tunable signal with composites, vibration is akin to the amplitude of an electromagnetic circuit. Dielectricity and magnetisms being the conjugate geometry of the entire universe the hyperboloid and the torus are together one but the center of which has no magnetism and all that magnetism is is the dielectric field. A center which is everywhere with its circumference no where. Light is a tranverse electromagnetic circuit with longitudinal pulse perturbations of the ether but no one sees light they see illumination. All matter is high energy light. Light is the historesis of the ether as against itself. The ether is pure unmanifest energy with no Cartesian coordinate as seen at the dielectric inertial plane of a magnet but not located there, it is incommensurate you can split a magnet 1 million times and find a new plane of inertia. This is getting a bit much though I recommend reading uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism by Ken Wheeler for an in-depth and complete explanation of magnetism and grand unified theory.
@RUMP3LST1LT5K1N2 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this!!!
@experiencemystique49822 жыл бұрын
Wave? Is it catalogue as thing?
@TruthHealsUs2 жыл бұрын
10:52 shoutout to all the 120 year olds in our community. We ❤️ you.
@youGooglin2 жыл бұрын
Amazing. I'm having a little trouble wrapping my head around waves of water. Why aren't they waves of energy traveling through water? Considering the energy Travels great Distances, one side of an ocean to the other at hundreds of miles an hour, & the water it appears to me it moves through only makez small circles? a
@bethanybromley97102 жыл бұрын
Tarot - The Empress - Demiurge
@lex_amaru_thesun2 жыл бұрын
This is what I've been waiting for
@mariusalexandru35082 жыл бұрын
Hi Ken, you've said several times that you don't think much of the so-callled new age movement, I'm curious as to your opinion on "supernatural" phenomena, whether they be described as magic, miracles, siddhis, parapsychology etc. Do you give any credence to them? If so, what would account for a person exhibiting such things?
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Supernatural is only supernatural because it is outside the scope of comprehension of the average person. Like a fish out of water walking on dry land, dry land still being natural itself but nothing is known except through the modality of the knower. This being said people do not have spiritual experiences, spiritual beings have embodied experiences.
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
If you believe you are your soul, then you are a "supernatural" phenomena. Supernatural simply means that which science has not (yet) found the way to measure or detect, or explain. Magnetism is literally "magic" for science, as it cannot explain it.
@donaldcleckner91262 жыл бұрын
Quelling the aether. Since everything that exists is, because the aether is perturbed. Is it possible to quell an area of space and when you do it, all matter and energy ceases to exist?
@lukiepoole92542 жыл бұрын
No. Instead the matter degrades into light and that light degrades into heat and then it ceases.
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
@@lukiepoole9254 Like you know
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
Everything is because of God. The aether is canvas not the Artist.
@EeAh9632 жыл бұрын
…And Thanos snapped his fingers.
@lukiepoole92542 жыл бұрын
@@pm2819 Can you prove "God"/Architect exist and not just a figment of imagination? Aether is proven, God/Creator/Architect haven't.
@krissykatportal2 жыл бұрын
Ooooo the demiurge 👀 I just clicked on the video. I’ll get my popcorn. Edit: I’m 2:13 in and already it’s over my head😭 but I’ll listen anyway😘
@MrJcbird2 жыл бұрын
I come to Ken’s videos to feel dumb.
@krissykatportal2 жыл бұрын
@@MrJcbird yeah I wish I was super smart like Ken
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@MrJcbird Real stupidity is not realising you’re stupid,which means you’re not stupid.
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
heheehehehe!!!!
@johnsondoeboy27722 жыл бұрын
@@KenTheoriaApophasis Greetings. I searched “Coin Mez-embria” and couldn’t find anything.
@Kingswood-qv7srАй бұрын
Illumination= demiurge Light= the one divine ect Light = Rest Illumination = perturbation, inertia, disturbance?
@jackbarlocks34412 жыл бұрын
'LIKING' your video was the logical and sensible response K.
@AlternicityBlogspot2 жыл бұрын
12:59 I'm getting a pdf of Ovid's Tristia, how about you?
@poepflater2 жыл бұрын
I hate when I understand what other people say but don't agree completely. Why does the world or souls exist? What made it? I can't believe in nothing exploding and turning into this. You mentioned spirit. Why accept one invisible thing but deny another?
@ricochet28802 жыл бұрын
Maybe he doesn't believe that a spirit can have a will but not a body? I don't know why he wouldn't think that they're are types of spiritual beings that can manipulate reality through the aether realm. He mentioned the Higgs field and how a wave passes through it to become a particle. A wave is a frequency and a spirit is a frequency from what I can gather as well. Maybe there are things behind the higgs field that manipulate our reality ?
@poepflater2 жыл бұрын
@@ricochet2880 I always find it strange when people allude to one type of invisible spiritual form but deny the source or others.. It's like someone saying he is an atheist but he believes in ghosts. I've had the good fortune in my younger years to play with many entheogens and have seen parts of heaven and hell. So for me, it is reasonably easy to acknowledge the invisible.
@skannerdk72682 жыл бұрын
Arrogance will blind a person, there are many things his eyes have never seen or experienced as to be so certain about how all reality works.
@Bistra49822 жыл бұрын
Hello 👋🏼 Ken, have you considered and viewed the arguments for the flat, non-rotational, stationary Earth?
@JJ-wi2uw2 жыл бұрын
"Time is not a thing" ... If I think about this for too long, my brain will start to hurt.
@JJ-wi2uw2 жыл бұрын
@♜WhatsapMe +⓵⓷⓷⓻⓷⓽⓼⓼⓪⓽⓸ NO!
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
A division/moment of time is a shadow. But does this mean shadows don’t exist?
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Of course shadows arn’t objects,neither are X-rays,pheromones,dreams,emotions,radio signals.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 And all exist as phenomena.Everything is phenomena,yes including solid objects.Everything is one.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 So there are two things?
@Anders012 жыл бұрын
I looked up demiurge on Wikipedia. It sounds like the demiurge is the same as the Word in the Bible! In John 1 it says that the Word has created everything, and a word, of course, is changeless, which also makes it the same as Brahman. Like a platonic form which is a structure that has "design" without the need for a separate designer.
@Anders012 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Ah ok, that makes sense, I heard that Christ represents the Word being manifested. And it fits with for example "Truly I tell you, before Abraham was born, I am." as Jesus said somewhere in the Bible.
@MartinEnderlin2 жыл бұрын
👌🙏🙏🙏👌 So grateful to learn from your wisdom. Have a happy weekend, too ❣️ Hope you take time to enjoy the nature in the woods...
@jimleane75782 жыл бұрын
What you say Ken aligns with what Paul says in Hebrews 11v3 when "Rhema" is understood as vibration. The voice comes from counter space.
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
The voice is the manifestation of thought. First the word resonates in the mind, then it "comes out".
@jimleane75782 жыл бұрын
@@inesvalenzuela4958 beautifully said.
@amycbtron60982 жыл бұрын
😆😂🤣 On your memorial or statue I swear it's gonna have that famous quote of yours on it..."I'm gonna scrub that outta this video." 😂😂😭
@alexkinna95912 жыл бұрын
1,1,2,3,5,... Re: the first two digits. The Principle and the attribute. Perhaps also like the seed and the sprout? Anyways, you are speaking my language, and I get a lot out of your dialogues. Thank you, Ken.
@corticallarvae2 жыл бұрын
People are unfortunately used to being spoken to like children.
@BeArtch2 жыл бұрын
Greeks didn’t come up with it, they just put names and titles on it. Spirituality was around long before Greeks.
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
Greeks are the reason there is still reason.
@BeArtch2 жыл бұрын
@@pm2819 makes no sense.
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
@@BeArtch what does not make sense?
@BeArtch2 жыл бұрын
Greeks are the reason there is still reason, makes no sense.
@pm28192 жыл бұрын
@@BeArtch Sure it does. 😎
@DoctahDizzle2 жыл бұрын
I hope this isn't a stupid question, but if time doesn't exist, then why do we experience it? Is this related to our experience of the "shadow," which is just an absence of something?
@TheLastOutlaw-KTS2 жыл бұрын
If by the word “experience”you mean why do we age, or organisms decay etc that is not caused by time…that’s just biological/physical processes. Time is a measure made possible by the existence of anything with volume existing in a space. If there were no space then there would be no concept of time…everything would be instant.
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
phenomena beings suffer time, of course, conventionally it does exist, just not ultimately
@harmonic33502 жыл бұрын
What brand of coffee? I need some :D
@Conchobar-Ghabra8 ай бұрын
Found it. Thank you. Looking forward to your take
@Tyrael662 жыл бұрын
What if the holy grail was ac generator? 😀😀😀
@00xanawolf002 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear your meditations on the Buddhist concept/principle of “Anattā”, or “No Self”. (Having a wonderful time... wish I was here! AND The lights are on but nobody’s home!)
@triggerhappy1yearold2 жыл бұрын
i think that when people ask about what happens when you die, they're really asking if you have all your memories and stuff like you do right now after your body dies
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
Some people claim to have memory of past lives.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 Yes.The brain is the radio set in this regard.
@mikehight24492 жыл бұрын
So in the double slit experiment what is ment when they say the wave function collapses. Waves of what?
@douglasalfseike38672 жыл бұрын
Being of German descent, we have a problem with overly complicating a solution to a simple problem at times.
@TheLastOutlaw-KTS2 жыл бұрын
been waiting on this one…🔥
@bakcompat2 жыл бұрын
Came to watch a video on The Demiurge. Instead, got 20 minutes of rambling on a multitude of topics that are already seen in your other videos.
@TheLastOutlaw-KTS2 жыл бұрын
So demiurge refers to the process in between spirit and the resulting manifestation of matter. And not a literal sentient, spiritual artificer…
@johngarvin88882 жыл бұрын
Witchcraft
@stevemalecki74312 жыл бұрын
Is not the Sun ☀️ light? And you can see it 🤷🏻♂️
@benreece76402 жыл бұрын
I liked this video.
@wobblyboost2 жыл бұрын
a generator is a matter creator that builds electrons and puts them on a cable train for your engine ... or; a generator manifests the existing field i know which one makes more sense to me
@harmonic33502 жыл бұрын
The radio dies. The signal always remains and manifests more radios for its muse.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
Would there be a signal if there were never any radios?
@harmonic33502 жыл бұрын
@@redpillnibbler4423 it was like that for a brief moment. The signal got very bored and started some drama one can view a creator by their works.
@HODL-Diamond-Hands2 жыл бұрын
since you asked, do a vid on Purgatory. i don't think i have seen one. thank you!
@HODL-Diamond-Hands2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 not what religion says about it, the true meaning of it.
@defcrossbones2 жыл бұрын
So what’s the deal with the tidal locked moon and this heart we live on???
@defcrossbones2 жыл бұрын
@@bobann3566 we are on the Sun. We are on the Lady that shines White Light. This female dragon’s heart/Brain is coupled with the male dragon that you see in the sky. It’s the Set and Seti ie Adam and Eve. The Earth above and heart of fire known as Tartarus that Prometheus delivered.
@frankfoti2 жыл бұрын
Δημιουργεις φιλοσιφικη συζητηση
@denzali2 жыл бұрын
We are meat shadows, flesh projections.
@KJIgnacio2 жыл бұрын
Would you ever do a video on what you know about the sun? The source of it, the illumination, its magnetism, and life giving qualities. Lol idk you tell me Ken. Lol if you want to.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
The atmosphere blocking out harmful radiation , the earth being at the golden ratio from the sun , the light in the visible spectrum being at the golden ratio on the entire spectrum, water being the atenna for life and having a perfect Golden triangle geometry on and on and on. Yes he does have videos such as this, check em out they are great. Light, illumination, principal and attribute.
@ArabRocky2 жыл бұрын
When u said "not a thing" I was like 🤔
@philaofishx48762 жыл бұрын
This is fantastic and actually very much needed.
@joeylamp_holder20132 жыл бұрын
Wow. Much appreciated
@NotAnnaJones2 жыл бұрын
So is the aether really light? Everything is light? Everything is electricity? And space is the womb of magnetism?
@aquariusrising1442 жыл бұрын
[NAJ]: So is the aether really light? [AR]: Yes. [NAT]: Everything is light? [AR]: Yes. [NAT]: Everything is electricity? [AR]: Electromagnetism, Yes. [NAT]: And space is the womb of magnetism? [AR]: From a Philosophical POV, Yes.
@lightninginmyhands48782 жыл бұрын
What’s the truth about the pentagram?
@leytonglover728010 ай бұрын
The demiurge, The urge for i (illumination) M (magnetic) E (electric) D (dielectric) Demiurge.
@helixreggae2 жыл бұрын
Lots of love and regards
@aquariusrising1442 жыл бұрын
Its a Good Thing that THE INTERNET IS FOREVER: Bob & Ann [B&A]: Love is not giving nor is it taking. Love is pure potential, aether. Love is dielectric acceleration. [AR]: Hogwash. Love is not Scientifically Measurable. Dielectric Acceleration is. Therefore, Love Cannot be Dielectric Acceleration (a Scientific Measurement). [B&A]: Put aside your belief, and put aside your knowledge and try to remember Love as Self. [AR]: Folk Wisdom Cliché’. [B&A]: There is no giving, there is no taking, these are of magnetism, matter magnitude, the loss of potential. [AR]: More Pseudo-Scientific Folk Wisdom Cliché’. If there is No Giving or Taking, then Don’t Pay Your Rent/Mortgage, & Tell Me How that Worked Out For You After the Bank Seizes Your Property. Or did You Give it to them? Or did they Take it? According to Your Logic, Neither Happened, as it was just all a Magnetic Phenomenon. [B&A]: Love is like gravity. There is no force. There is no push, there is no pull, there is only acceleration, increasing potential and aether inertia. [AR]: Yet Another Pseudo-Scientific Folk Wisdom Cliché’. Descriptions aren’t Explanations. [B&A]: Taking care of my self (interest) is in harmony with Natural Order. [AR]: Nope. Taking Care of Yourself ‘not at the intentional expense of others’ is in Harmony. [B&A]: There is no such thing as Selflessness. Absurd. [AR]: So, there is Scientific Love, but no Selflessness? Talk about Absurd. & Contradictive. [AR]: Tell Ya What; Go Fight for Your Country, Watch a Man Jump on a Grenade to Save the Lives of His Squad, & then come back & tell His Widow that He did it because He was ‘Selfish.’ [B&A]: Individuals that help out other people are doing so out of their own self interest. [AR]: You Sounds just like the One-Sided Slanted Views of Ayn Rand. The Ole’ “We Do Everything Out of Our Own Selfish Desires” Argument. [B&A]: People that Give do it because it makes them "feel" good. [AR]: Exactly what Ayn Rand Said. Imagine that. [B&A]: That Feel Good part is the self interest/selfish part. You have an error in your thinking about morality love and self interest. I did too. [AR]: The Error is Not Mine, Thank Goodness. [B&A]: I found out I was not my beliefs and that made it real easy to get rid of them. [AR]: A Satanist Couldn’t Have Said it Better. “Do What Thou Wilt.”
@johngarvin88882 жыл бұрын
1) Witchcraft... 2) There is no "space"
@VVizeman2 жыл бұрын
Our biggest fear is death. Our Biggest loss is memory. So few of us remember.. The tragedy of our past has become the prison of our minds
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
Lol, Speak for yourself. I can't stop laughing at the tragedies of my past....
@VVizeman2 жыл бұрын
@@inesvalenzuela4958 Even though I am not talking about our life's past, that is a healthy attitude to have. Keep on loling Ines
@Paul_Marek2 жыл бұрын
Recent images of black holes are NOT the same (resultant) as what we see in a ferrocell. Check out Veritasium’s recent vid “A picture of the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole” on why these images of black holes look the way they do. Note that I’m not saying that a magnet and a black hole are not the same thing, but I am saying that their imagery are not the same thing.
@christophermackle34192 жыл бұрын
Also that "imagery" comes from "official" sources like NASA who wouldn't be the most dependable on honesty in that department. It's basically a picture of a ring magnet as your eyes show you with crude bulging effect in part. NASA haven't built shit all that can take an actual picture of the earth, never mind a black hole in "space". It's all fake. If you can't look up at it with a powerful telescope, it's not there. Images, imagery, imagination. Try and see the cult perimeters and where beliefs start. Unless you can see it, it's a distraction.
@Paul_Marek2 жыл бұрын
@@christophermackle3419 Watch that video I mentioned and see if you still have that conspiratorial perspective. “It’s all fake” is a bit of a copout.
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
wrong, same image, the conjugate geometry of teh universe is the same
@Paul_Marek2 жыл бұрын
@@KenTheoriaApophasis hey dude! If that’s correct, then why is Veritasium’s explanation wrong? I get that black holes and magnets are the same conjugate geometry, but the imaging technique is so vastly different, and a black hole’s “gravity” is so much greater to bend light.
@christophermackle34192 жыл бұрын
@@Paul_MarekI do mean it really IS all fake. I do not trust any imagery (not pictures mind) of anything in space that is not seen through a telescope. You would be wise to question all images or they form part of a belief system. Sciencism.
@theronimisha2 жыл бұрын
I feel smarter watching your videos Ken. Which means i'll keep watching and studying ofc.
@riza8762 жыл бұрын
You're too smart! Yes really.
@bb-zr1gw2 жыл бұрын
Everything is living and its all about relationships.-George Bush.
@jeffup89562 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about evolution and the force behind why it seems to "want" to survive and how you see it from the point of view of magnetic principles
@bwiane2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Ken is interested in Theology. I mean what's your take on the Kosmic Gods and Fate?
@helixreggae2 жыл бұрын
Have you contacted me need to know as I'm contacted by someone from your channel please confirm
@EnergyTRE2 жыл бұрын
our senses are designed to detect the effect of the disturbance. not the actual disturbance. P.S magic sounds so cheap like a deception or trick. the aether is much greater then any magic.
@redpillnibbler44232 жыл бұрын
A division/moment of time is a shadow. But does this mean shadows don’t exist?
@eternalmonkey216 күн бұрын
wonder and excitement courses through my being the more that this video makes sense
@the_natrix99592 жыл бұрын
I came here for magnetism...now look at me standing in Ken's sensible rantings vortex.
@katbat23792 жыл бұрын
Demi Gods are like the finishers. They did not create the materials, they create with the materials. Hence Demi Gods.
@inesvalenzuela49582 жыл бұрын
You are a demi god.
@katbat23792 жыл бұрын
@@inesvalenzuela4958 :).
@jeffreymortag522 жыл бұрын
APPRECIATE your STRAIGHT talk
@e.powerdc11272 жыл бұрын
Hi Ken can you make a video on Magnetism & Dielectric the working model. Example... What is Dielectric? How does it function? Notes Other than comparing dielectric too Magnetism. We need a different way to understand it.
@hughjones44302 жыл бұрын
Dielectricity is like electrostatics. But this might help. Pressure mediation of the ether as against itself like in a sunflower how the seeds are as tightly packed as possible. The same hypertrochoid pattern as seen under a ferrocell. The superimposition of both the hyperboloid and the torus. It all starts with a 3 dimensional s curve brought about by this spatial counterspatial conjugate geometry which defines the entire universe the magnetic and the dielectric an inseperable holos. Everything is dielectric permitivity and magnetic permeability, the smaller the space the higher the capacitance but really if you want to understand this there is no other way it can be. I recommend watching more of his videos, downloading his word definition list and reading his books.
@choiceindulgence2 жыл бұрын
Phenomenon is a burden of the spirit, Spirit is the burden of phenomenon, But Burden is the spirit of phenomenon.
@alienscientist88932 жыл бұрын
I thought the demiurge was king of the Archons as in the fake farther god, they the Sophianic Celtic pagans believed the earth was the goddess of wisdom. No,, that's what I thought,, comes from the Sethian interpretation of Naghamadi codiese..
@Swamie552 жыл бұрын
Well that was a morning cup of coffee right there,,
@jumpbackon2 жыл бұрын
is the lawnmower man an illusion or a necessary distraction? Thank you Ken for taking the time.
@lorenzoderogel76442 жыл бұрын
I have been watching your videos and I find them very informative. I do not find them to be complicated as that comment said. I, too, have made those types of questions. In grammar school teachers would look at me like “umm, anyway [hard eye roll] lol
@treeLiterАй бұрын
🔥🔥🔥
@stephensnyder38392 жыл бұрын
Hi Ken - Just wanted to let you know you ARE successful at helping people understand (especially magnetism, dielectric and the aether) I may not agree with everything you say concerning God but that’s ok. For me personally the principle / attribute was an ah-ha moment for my Christian beliefs because I view God as the Principle and us as the attribute. Love your work Also, I agree that people always cover Truth with poo… almost always for the purpose of control and power especially when it come to “established“ religions and it’s edited text
@KenTheoriaApophasis2 жыл бұрын
i am?
@stephensnyder38392 жыл бұрын
@@KenTheoriaApophasis No you’re not editing text… Those that controlled the churches / governments especially the papacy
@joseph.micheal.romero2 жыл бұрын
Thank you making everything so simple. Great explanation
@tscale3266 Жыл бұрын
Ken could I send you my baphomet Barbie doll ? 💁♀️🌎👼All I could hear while listening to this was the song material girl by Madonna - all love ❤️🐲