The Difference between Heirloom, Hybrid & GMO Seeds and Plants

[@Steamer173]

Thank you for clearly and succinctly explaining GMOs without lauding or demonizing them.

[@Marina_DU]

Is good that you explained GMOs exactly as what they are and not as an inherently bad thing 😊

[@alvingalang5106]

Not knowing whether it’s bad doesn’t mean it’s bad. But neither we know it’s good.

[@Diseaseisreversible]

@@alvingalang5106it’s good. GMO will save the planet one day.

[@elandthirkhaoth4718]

​@@alvingalang5106after 30+ years of studies, id say we DO know the answer to that. Just most people refuse to read.

[@elsancho-mx7om]

​@@alvingalang5106i bet your IQ is in the single digits.

[@dacenmclean7901]

@@alvingalang5106did you have a stroke while writing this?

[@robertruiz98]

I remember when Monsanto was trying to sue other Farmers from having their crops pollinated by their plants from the wind. Anything corporate is just evil

[@moromir0]

Gotta say brother. Your content is amazing. 10/10 no bullshit

[@earthnailsandtails]

Appreciate that!!

[@verify6329]

I mean really all domesticated plants are GMOs, we just did it the long and hard way

[@RandHKIS]

Yup! If humans have selected for traits that they prefer over generations and generations, they have been modified from the wild type plants. This means that human intervention has modified their genomes through selection, and they are therefore genetically modified

[@need2connect]

Hybrid seeds are produced by cross-breeding of two varieties through artificial mating, while genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are created by genetic engineering, altering the genetic material of an organism.3 GMOs can be any plant, animal, or microorganism that has been genetically altered using molecular genetics techniques such as gene cloning and protein engineering.4 Hybrid seeds have been around for decades, but people still debate whether they're better than GMO seeds or vice versa.2 GMO seeds are far more unnatural and likely to cause harm to both the environment and human health.1 GMO crops have caused allergies, tumors, reproductive disorders in lab animals, livestock, and possibly humans, as well as the destruction of beneficial soil organisms and good soil structure that make it possible to grow food.

[@knottybynaturetreeca]

That's why it's called hybridization and not natural selection or GMO. This video clearly just explained that difference!

[@gregor2436]

​@@need2connect​this text is so full of misinformation oO. 1.: There is no correlation between eating gmo and cancer, both in lab and outside. 2.: GMO are not more dangerous regarding allergies. It depends solely on the amount of new proteins you encounter. There might be one or a small couple in gmo. If you use another breeding line or an exotic species, there are thousands. 3.: Almost all people are eating gmo on a regular basis. And I don't refer to hybrids, which are of course no GMOs. Have a look on mutagenesis ;). Using radioactive material to increase gene modification was pretty common. Today chemicals are used. There thousands of genes are modified in a totally unpredictable manner. And, if you are noodles e.g., I'm sure you ate something of it. 4.: Depending on the technology - it is literally impossible to find differences between breeding and e.g. crispr cas gmo. You only can make the process faster and more precise.

[@boogerman908]

​@@need2connectdogs are gmos

[@tylerthetourist4548]

Now here’s the fun part for video 2. Seed save all 3 and replant. Tell us what you get.. there’s a reason why homestead / off grid only use heirloom

[@earthnailsandtails]

That is fun I like it 👌🏼

[@conorknoxy]

They're all genetically different from their original plant, so through selective breeding/planting/pollination they're all genetically modified

[@srproductions8798]

True ..but with that being said...then there isnt an "original plant: to begin with

[@conorknoxy]

@@srproductions8798 there is the original plant. Iike the source plant of strawberries. It existed and we bred it until it was genetically different

[@srproductions8798]

@@conorknoxy nope...there is no "original" because that so called"original" was cross pollinated naturally over a series of years...essentially cross breeding it

[@conorknoxy]

@@srproductions8798 yes, but we're talking about human intervention. Catch up

[@iseemtobeaverb8249]

This is a solid explanation of how the term GMO is used *contemporarily*. But by the video’s own description, hybrids are genetically modified. My point is that GMO, in the sense of direct DNA manipulation in a lab, may be relatively new, but humans have been modifying the genetics of plants for millennia. So people who assert that hybrid tomatoes are genetically modified are not incorrect.

[@That_one_introvert.]

Exactly

[@kathrynmerrick977]

Well thank you young Sir ❤ By the way fantastic garden 👍 Make Your Happiness 😊 ❤

[@earthnailsandtails]

Thank you! And amen to that 🙏🏼

[@whispercure9770]

That shirt is fire. ❤

[@obedan3990]

Heirlooms mostly in my country…so natural so real and so original♥️

[@thatguy2535]

I'm tired of people thinking gmos are bad. Making a plant use less pesticides, and water to grow a larger crop isnt a bad thing. Half the people in developing countries would be blind if it wasn't for gmo rice having vitamin A. Also the majority of "organic" produce you buy at a grocery store isn't organic just a lable to make it expensive. There isn't too much regulation on what can be called organic.

[@jlseagull2.060]

Agree with big thumb up!

[@Super_Nova739]

Gmos are bad. They create a monopoly first and foremost, forcing people to buy the same seed from a company year after year because they cannot save their own seed. They also harm our health, and since pesticides and herbicides are still used quite heavily (they don't use less, the gmo plants are just resistant to them) they still kill off native vegetation and insects and contaminate waterways. They also do not use fewer of anything else, and they are not feeding the world like companies claimed when they started them. Gmos are also completely unnecessary and extremely unnatural. They have pesticides and herbicides put into their dna, there is no cleaning it off afterwards. They have next to no nutrients because of monocrop farming and tilling. And don't act like fake charity justifies gmos. Rice is heavily contaminated with arsenic. And synthetic nutrients are not absorbed or used the same way in our bodies. They also make places seem poorer and harder off than they are, and do photo ops of "helping" with things people do not want or need. Help people plant native gardens and collect water? Nope, gonna give them non native foods they cannot digest, some medications they do not need, and take some pictures to virtue signal before never doing anything for them again. Build them houses or teach them skills? Nope, build a few for pictures then leave. Teach them about wild medicine and the like? Nope, give them side effect laden meds that further deplete vitamins and minerals, and then synthetic vitamins and minerals that do nothing for them.

[@Marina_DU]

I think he explained GMOs pretty objectively. I agree with you, though. I hate people thinking GMOs are inherently bad: there have been some bad practices like what Monsanto did with glyphosate, but GMOs are a tool that we'll definitely have to use more and more in the future. Fear-mongering will only result in stupid restrictions put by people who don't understand GMOs to please the masses (like what happened with the Golden Rice and Green Peace, and the stupid restrictions in Europe) instead of sensible regulations put by informed people -_-

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

The vitamin A rice failed to yield as much rice in field trials as other varieties. So the reason they're not blind has nothing to do with the experimental Vitamin A rice which they're not growing because of inferior yield. In some places commercial rice is fortified with fake rice grains that are really vitamin pills shaped like rice.

[@bbbean]

... theres actually a lot of regulation on what can be called organic.

[@childofyah-u-ah1370]

Now explain the seed saving process between the three. Only one of those will reproduce like *The Creator* intended.💯

[@MichaelSHartman]

By evolution.

[@comenowletusreason6330]

Yeah. I noticed how he failed to mention that. 🙄

[@earthnailsandtails]

totally deserves its own video@@comenowletusreason6330

[@bradical2723]

Yes I'm also tired of people who clearly have no idea what they're talking about using hybrid and gmo interchangeably

[@onetwocue]

All i could think about is his shirt

[@butterflyj685]

Thank you for clarifying this because I too have gotten tired of the ignorance and misinformation.

[@deevanderheiden]

Thank you!!!! Finally someone who gets it. Yes. Replaced with genetics of a bug or fish or something else. Hybrid is NOT a GMO

[@rainwaterrefugehomestead2267]

There are actually no GMO tomatoes available to the public at all. You can't buy GMO tomatoes from the store or in seed form. They don't exist. Only in labs. So yeah, this misconception drives me nuts!!

[@jlseagull2.060]

Only contract farmers get to grow those gmo’s. They have contracts with labs/companies who own intellectual property rights of certain gmo’s.

[@rainwaterrefugehomestead2267]

@jlseagull2.060 Yes. But there are no GMO tomatoes. You cannot buy a GMO tomato in the store. They don't exist. At least in the US.

[@earthnailsandtails]

Good stuff! This information is for all veggies, tomatoes were just the example

[@JP-wb1oo]

@@rainwaterrefugehomestead2267 Norfolk Plant Sciences has genetically modified purple tomatoes in the US but at a very limited supply. Having just gotten approval last month, the tomatoes will be coming to the wider US market soon. They also plan to release a purple beefsteak and seeds for home gardeners.

[@elsancho-mx7om]

​@@rainwaterrefugehomestead2267 you're wrong, they do exist. There was the flavr savr- discontinued because of low sales, and a purple Japanese tomato that was approved for sale here last year and should hit shelves this year. There are also multiple other strains being worked on here in the states.....

[@mangohogplumsummertime7191]

Great info, because most ppl aren't sure of what these mean, I myself for one. Thanks much!

[@earthnailsandtails]

No problem!

[@archibaldt.6]

...I'm pretty sure hybridization is a form of genetic modification, albeit through natural processes. So yeah, 'hybrid' probably is a GMO.

[@earthnailsandtails]

I’ll give you that, indeed through a natural process which is what separates it

[@zakzag]

No, they are not GMOs. Even if you think they are

[@archibaldt.6]

"A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an animal, plant, or microbe whose DNA has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. For thousands of years, humans have used breeding methods to modify organisms." -NatGeo Genetic Modification = GMO (Genetically Modified Organism). Hybrid means genetic modification/tampering. Hybrid, therefore, always means GMO. GMOs are everywhere and aren't inherently evil or harmful. We're just using more advanced techniques these days to cultivate crops with desirable traits. Next time just do a little research.@@zakzag

[@zedmeinhardt3404]

​@@zakzagThey are GMOs even if you think they aren't

[@zakzag]

@@zedmeinhardt3404 event though during hybridization causes genetic modification, still not GMO as GMO has a definition, and hybridization does not match with it. easy it is.

[@brianrice1613]

There are also no GMO tomatoes on the market

[@paulbroussard8835]

So true spread the word

[@jannafolsom1069]

People do this with garden plants too. For example The Heavy Hitter okra. It's a Clemson spinless okra. A man saved seeds from the biggest producers over the years to create his heirloom.

[@sarahjena1851]

GMO is also designed to work with pesticides, ie Roundup.

[@EpicManaphyDude]

from what i’ve understood selective breeding is technically genetic manipulation in a way. but I really appreciate the way you frame gmos

[@johnd7108]

Heirloom tomato plants are actually hybrids that have not been crossed with other hybrids for multiple generations. If you open pollinate them you get an unknown hybrid. After multiple generations of open pollination you'll probably end up with a cherry tomato as it approaches a wild type plant

[@phild8095]

I've been preaching this for years. I am a hybrid, Irish and Italian.

[@NorwayVestfold]

Thank you !

[@devoncottone1553]

That backround plant has SO many tomatoes!!! Im jelous...great job!!!❤

[@earthnailsandtails]

thanks for noticing!

[@neoanderson4840]

Thanks ... useful information 😊🤗🤗🤗

[@rockkhound943]

Great info . Nice editing

[@marysullivan3881]

Gregor Mendal in the 1800's performed experiments with pea plants by cross pollinating plants to increase characteristics he was trying to achieve. It takes longer to achieve the desired plant descendant. It can be achieved in a totally organic method. Obviously these experiments occured before genetic slicing. This this lends further facts to support your argument.😊

[@julietteoscaralphanovember2223]

🤣🤣 I like your t-shirt, it's funny!!

[@henryjubeda7617]

No, GMOs are genetically modified through e coli bacteria to have traits of entirely unrelated plant families. For example, Monsanto made various crops extremely resistant to roundup. Weeds related to these crops are now also resistant due to cross pollination.

[@TheSoilandGreen]

Niacin was added to food genetically modified to make it better for us. I’m not sure if that was in the 50s or 40s but almost every food we eat nowadays has niacin in it.

[@raerohan4241]

That's not actually from genetic modification. What you're talking about is called food fortification. It's basically adding vitamins to food, often staple foods, to combat deficiencies in your population. It doesn't work for some foods, like rice, which is why golden rice was so revolutionary. But it's a good practice as well. Not the same as GMO though.

[@olesya34]

It was an article where they explained about taking genetic material from cockroaches , rats and crossing it with genetic material of vegetables .

[@raerohan4241]

What genes, what vegetables? If the article didn't provide specific information, and if that information wasn't correct, then you got fooled by either a fake article or satire.

[@viridian4573]

Modern open pollinated varieties and heirlooms are both produced by open pollination, but only vintage varieties can be called heirloom. Heirloom literally means something passed down from previous generations.

[@CLance-mo7bo]

EXCELLENT INFORMATION,!!! NOW SHARE SOME OF THOSE MATOES😊

[@lbthingsstuffmore9513]

People and their comments are just smart enough to be stupid. Good on you for giving a biology lesson. P.s. I'm an heirloom gal myself, but my cherry tomatoes do what they want.😂. 🖖👍

[@paulbarthol8372]

An heirloom is bred in isolation from other varieties. If you grow it near another variety; voila, you have a random hybrid.

[@toanly7746]

when you keep breeding two parent plants to get the hybrid with the genetic characteristics you want is not gmo because gmo is more effective at getting the genetics desired.

[@raerohan4241]

It is still GMO. The acronym "GMO" is a purely legal term. In reality, humans have been modifying stuff for millennia through selective breeding, which is a form of genetic modification. We wouldn't have things like dogs, corn, and most brassicas without it. And all of our produce would look more like wild fruits and veg. Tiny, with huge seeds, and more sour or bitter.

[@ISoloYouRelax]

Same thing. One is done via selective breeding the other is in a lab. Both with the same intended outcomes from the sound of it.

[@rustyshackleford9888]

The misunderstanding is that "gmo" can refer to any organism that is the result of genetic modification, which can be through gene editing techniques like you mentioned or simply by artificial selection via human agriculture. By this definition, most food crops we eat today are "genetically modified" since we have artificially selected for certain genetic variants expressing desirable traits over many generation, and they no longer reflect their "natural" counterparts that you would find in the wild (and in fact many COULDN'T survive in the wild without human management anyway).

[@need2connect]

You watched this video and still got it wrong. GMO are spliced with foreign DNA in a lab. Your definition of GMO is very much outdated.

[@rustyshackleford9888]

@@need2connect that is one way to genetically modify an organism. Another is to artifically select for specific desirable traits over many generations. You are still modifying the genetics of a population of organisms by artificially increasing the frequency of those traits beyond what would be naturally selected for without human intervention. Both are ways of genetic modification. Yes, creating transgenic organisms is different from artificial selection. But the point of including both under the same definition is to challenge the idea that artificially selected crops are "more natural" than transgenic crops. Both are unnatural and are genetically modified, but that also isn't necessarily a bad thing. E.g., corn as we know it today could not survive on its own in the wild without human assisstance and is a mutated abomination of its wild counterpart, teosinte. But artificially selected corn is not inherently a bad thing, and neither are transgenic crops (in contrast to what anti-GMO people would have you believe).

[@michaellauck6062]

Hybrids can be GMOs. If you specifically cross two plants to get specific traits then yes it's a GMO. But there's nothing bad about that. You can do it carefully in a lab modifying only the DNA you want or you can just breed things till you stumble on the modifications you want. It's like farming with just a hoe or farming with a tractor and modern tools. That's the only difference.

[@cloudjumper7285]

Thanks for the lesson. ❤😊

[@DimiDzi]

some hybrids can reproduce(some with 100% resemblance to first generation) and some are mules

[@_uwu_9992]

Thank u! I was just thinking about how to mix plant breeds together and u mentioning hybrids is definitely a great piece of info.

[@harambe273]

GMOs could end world hunger but we’re too obsessed with arbitrary health myths to really humor that possibility

[@elizabethjansen2684]

Thanks so many get confused. Don't get me started on the different sweetners being confused with artificial ones.

[@Super_Nova739]

Gmos are also lab made, they don't happen in nature like hybrids, and they use dna from completely unrelated things, like adding pesticides or herbicides directly into the plant dna, or splicing jellyfish dna into a plant.

[@Honeey_Badger_DontCare]

Making a hybrid is genetically modifing an organism, just more of a guessing game. You breed 2 or more separate kinds of tomatoes together to get a mix bag of traits. You keep doing this until it generates an acceptable tomatoe with the good qualities of the parent plants. People think that because we are better at it now and can go in to precisely change the traits. That this makes it bad or part of an conspiracy. It's just science and humans are getting better at it. Thats what's got us to this point in time.

[@dancingflower]

Thank-you, thank-you, thank- you 😊

[@candinunya5211]

I wouldn't describe gmo as a gene splicing. It is one that selectively bred for its beneficial characteristics

[@davidtrindle6473]

It’s not modified for “pest fighting.”‘it’s modified for pesticide/herbicide tolerance.

[@kimsmith1746]

I have regular size apples (green) growing on my crabapple (red) trees. Cross pollination from my apple trees. I didn't do it. It just happened. Is that GMO?

[@sammer28]

I had a fellow chef argue that selective breeding is technically GMO. I explained as best I could that isn't how any of that works and he kept doubling down.

[@need2connect]

Your co-worker was right

[@sammer28]

@@need2connect no they were not correct. Nor were they a co-worker. Otherwise every single domesticated crop and animal would be a GMO. This is not the case. Are you arguing that native Americans were making GMOs before they even had the wheel? You clearly don't grasp the concept

[@patriciabernard8386]

Get down to the nitty gritty---what's your opinion of the GMOs?

[@earthnailsandtails]

I grow my own food so that should give you an idea haha

[@darylhudson777]

GMO can be good or bad. What I'm wondering is if GMO could possibly mutate with new strains of poisons in an effort to fight off insects but also be harmful to humans.

[@MrAdryan1603]

Gmos are absolutely not an inherently bad thing. Not at all. People need to actually learn this

[@Yahkahey]

Great explanation. Thank you!

[@earthnailsandtails]

Glad it was helpful!

[@heidis3993]

I used to think that “GMO” was something very general, and that whether it was a good thing or a bad one depended on the purpose for which it had been modified. But it seems that plants are being modified for just one purpose, in actuality, and that is pesticide resistance, to allow a field to be doused in Roundup or the like, and still produce tomatoes. I don’t want to be eating pesticides, and I don’t want to cause agricultural workers, and their children, to be exposed to them. Someone else may be happy with the other choice.

[@carleenfuller1370]

NO GMO

[@basspuppy133]

Almost all plants these days are GMOs, they have been for hundreds of years.

[@bubblesmctoker]

Why not? Use some big boy words and explain why not.

[@dinonoobster4460]

Are hybrids artificially pollinated? Or do they pollinate naturally?

[@BV4551Pl]

If fruits & vegetables were humans or some, they woulda been the most messed up birth defect things ever!

[@watata1t]

Well the biggest testies, booties,breasts or penises possible, and it seems like we are striving for that today. 🤣

[@earthnailsandtails]

Only in gardening are birth defects praised 😅

[@josecarmona9403]

Ciertamente ciertifiko. Yu my dawgh

[@757body8]

That’s awesome, thank you

[@sr9253]

Love the shirt! Where did you get it?

[@infiniteadam7352]

I would love some gmo tomatoes, ive never grown any tomatoes that I didn't have to fight for.

[@need2connect]

Hybrid seeds are produced by cross-breeding of two varieties through artificial mating, while genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are created by genetic engineering, altering the genetic material of an organism.3 GMOs can be any plant, animal, or microorganism that has been genetically altered using molecular genetics techniques such as gene cloning and protein engineering.4 Hybrid seeds have been around for decades, but people still debate whether they're better than GMO seeds or vice versa.2 GMO seeds are far more unnatural and likely to cause harm to both the environment and human health.1 GMO crops have caused allergies, tumors, reproductive disorders in lab animals, livestock, and possibly humans, as well as the destruction of beneficial soil organisms and good soil structure that make it possible to grow food.

[@eileen2906]

Thanks for sharing this info. All the very best frm England

[@healthstarter22]

Great explanation. Your wisdom is sought after

[@earthnailsandtails]

Glad it was helpful!

[@craigpedigo9983]

I hate to break it to you, but every cultivated plant for the last 12,000 years is genetically modified. By selecting plants and animals for the desired characteristics their genomes ARE being modified.

[@sknapp19911]

What’s difference between GMO and selective breeding?

[@ATable4You]

Technically speaking almost all crops are, in a way, GMOs. Take Mexico's beloved Corn for example, the Corn that we know today has undergone hundreds of selective breeding process to produce a high yeilding crop. Same with other crops such as rice, barely, wheat etc.

[@NoobCastProductions]

GMOs are not only organisms that have had their DNA spliced or replaced in a lab setting. Simple selective breeding without adding foreign DNA is a form of genetic modification.

[@macmacaguilar1749]

This is the guy that i wanted as my husband ❤

[@pumpkinlife103]

I find it hard to believe something that even though is genetically modified is totally bad. In terms of plants, i never ate a gmo plant and ended up a mutant.

[@gabrielalbores846]

It’s all the media that makes GMO look bad. A good portion of foods eaten today are GMO. Corn has come a LONG WAY from the maize that use to be available. We’ve gained access to foods in areas previously unadaptable and feed many more people with even less and less land. I don’t encourage it but it’s not a bad thing. We need it to adapt quickly for human needs

[@mikeymickey9442]

GMO is good specially in farming GMO plants are made to survive against plant fungus, weather and bugs. They grow faster and yield more/bigger. Without GMO in farming industry, there will be a food problem.

[@bubblesmctoker]

GMOs have saved countless lives. GMOs for the win!

[@unravel523]

I bought a "plumtomato", in a groserystore. Well, turned out small (little over sherrytomato size) meely, with a real sturdy thorn/pertruding point at the bottom. Pests can´t take them down. Here it´s been Dry, spidermites taken over, but no effect on this one. But it wasn´t a plumtomato. Guess you have to choose.

[@HercadosP]

Don't expect people that have been systematically fed lies and fearmongered for decades into knowing anything about the thing they are afraid of

[@stephendey5576]

All good except for the definition of open pollinated. Open pollinated means that the genetics are NOT patented and can be used by anyone to create new strains. Same concept as open software. New strains are created by cross pollination to create a Hybrid. After growing hybrids crossing them with themselves they become a "pure strain" after about 4-5 generations. A pure strain (F4 hybrid) is one that grows true to type. Which can then be classified as heirloom. It is something we learn it college botany and basic genetics. Another thing that makes tomato genetics so fun is that they self pollinate. So cross breeding is difficult. Very rewarding but difficult.

[@cw9790]

"Heirloom" is also a brand name that is owned by Monsanto. Know the difference!

[@Eric-gi9kg]

Great explanation Though I do have one beef.. Heirloom isn't always open, and pollination requiring insects for pollination. example.. Blue Lake pole beans are an Heirloom, but do not require an insect for pollination. The same goes for some tomatoes.

[@elsancho-mx7om]

Both blue lake and tomatoes are open pollinated.... wth are you talking about. Open pollinated can include anything in nature not just insects. Tomatoes having a perfect flower are able to polinate themselves with just a little breeze of wind. That is open pollination.

[@Eric-gi9kg]

@elsancho-mx7om My apologies. I stand corrected. I was told years ago the opposite.. hence my statement.

[@ClubOceanBlue22]

Nicely clarified bruh 👍

[@valeniusthekat]

PEW!!!!! enough said 🤣🤣🥰👍

[@anitas5817]

GMO’s themselves are not bad. It’s when the crop is doused with glyphosate that makes them bad, like in commercial corn and soy crops.

[@ivanhorvat8964]

Thank you 🙏 Very Much for that explanation , / for Everyone ! I just didn’t realize hybrid are only crosspolinsted ?!?! 🍁👍🙏👁️✝️

[@johnsheppard4428]

Bro please, they all have this info already and still don't understand

[@billb945]

This message brought to you by MONSANTO.

[@roberthickman2907]

I like the oxheart tomato, which is a purple tomato it is a low acid tomato not completely no acid like the orange tomato.

[@moonorchid9242]

GMO is not inherently bad. The only time it’s bad is when it’s developed to produce crops that farmers have to buy fresh seed for every season because the produce itself doesn’t develop mature seeds on its own

[@raerohan4241]

And that's not an issue inherent to GMOs. That's an issue inherent to corporate capitalism. Companies pull this stuff with everything, not just crops. If it was up to them, even clothing would be a subscription service rather than a one-time purchase 😑

[@sansho00]

So, hybrids over time could become heirlooms?

[@matthewblackwood4704]

Modern hybrids are superior in every way, other than being able to save the seeds.

[@lizabellos4859]

Thank you I have been watching some of your videos and I am very impressed with the information that you have shared.😊 Subscribed and hit bell.

[@earthnailsandtails]

Awesome! Thank you and I’m glad you enjoy the content 😁

[@nageleo7018]

Some are showers, some are growers 😂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

GMOs may have had genes removed or added, not necessarily both.

[@united.humans.organization4968]

Go natural, grow and share. Let's make natural seed banks. Love, peace.

[@austinyou2757]

Corn is GMO and and so are avocados when we first started cultivating these two foods and more they looked drastically different than they do for example corn only had a few edible kernels on and avocados barely had any of meat thats on it today