The End Of All "Handgun Rosters" In The U.S.

A new Federal lawsuit has now been filed that would end all "rosters" across the United States. While it does not directly contest the rosters themselves, a side effect of a legal victory would nullify their existence.
Don't risk your freedom and livelihood! Join AOR today.
Check out Attorneys on Retainer for yourself, and use code CJTV during sign up to save 50 your individual signup fee. tribelink.co/C...
Social Media
INSTAGRAM - / thedailyshooter76
Check out my Merch, Shirts, Mugs and More!
teespring.com/...
NOTICE: I am "NOT" a lawyer, and this should not be considered legal advice. These are my opinions.
(DISCLAIMER: This post may contain paid advertisements or affiliate links. What is an affiliate link? It means that if you click on one of the product links, Copper Jacket TV will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support the channel and allows awesome future content. Thank you for the support!
Disclaimer: These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately.

[@niveknospmoht8743]

Even if they pass a law getting rid of rosters doesn't mean they're going to delete them or follow the law. California is famous for not following constitutional law

[@dtran22]

But if this allows for Californians to purchase oos, we’d be able to travel to another state to buy.

[@theap0killyp1k2]

New York has had a long history of ignoring the supremacy clause, even going as far as harassing and attempting to arrest federal agents for state crimes like magazine restrictions.

[@ricksterffr5155]

CA will simply pass a new law requiring residents to purchase inside state lines. Then the lawsuit will start all over again (for us Californians)

[@thump3r]

You can still private purchase guns from someone not in the state. but have them shipped to a ffl to actually do it. You can also do this gifted.

[@TheDidjidude]

@@dtran22 You would still have to tell the Commies you brought it into the state. Just like anyone moving into this god forsaken state has to declare all the firearms they bring with them.

[@thomast6741]

A new lawsuit? So only 30 more years until it gets decided

[@tacd962]

🤦🏽‍♂️ Yup

[@fredsmith9788]

You are obviously an optimist.

[@UserUser14880]

*40

[@Ramces00]

2 weeks…

[@FK-AIPAC]

Until it gets denied 😂

[@wendysbaconator1175]

Give me an update in like 37 years when it gets to the first step of the court process. Lol

[@jtown998]

You hope it's that fast.

[@AustinNeal]

he will give you 100 updates about the same thing over and over with nothing new dont worry

[@m4rvinmartian]

You are thinking of old admins. That's not going to happen in this one.

[@wendysbaconator1175]

@ Trump ain’t got nothing to do with this lol

[@helloneighbor11]

Then 9th circuit reverses it

[@sourdoughisdelicious2055]

Shall Not Be Infringed should never be up for Interpretation.

[@aquariumdude7829]

Well, it is. Human beings are thinking creatures, and it's impossible to stop them from all having their own opinions.

[@DeltaLimaActual-t2o]

@@aquariumdude7829 Wrong Most people are NOT thinkers at all. A couple of quotes for you: "Thinking is difficult, that’s why most people judge." - Carl Jung; “The problem isn't that Johnny can't read. The problem isn't even that Johnny can't think. The problem is that Johnny doesn't know what thinking is; he confuses it with feeling.” --Thomas Sowell

[@Firedrake1313]

​@@aquariumdude7829 No, it isn't. It's very clear. If you don't like it fine, don't own a gun. But that doesn't give you the right to keep me from doing so. The highest law of the land, that this country was founded upon says the people have the right to keep and bear arms. Period. No details, restrictions, exceptions etc. All Arms. All types.

[@steveb796]

Can’t carry into a trump rally or the Supreme Court. 2A can be infringed.

[@user-im6fy4qp6m]

thanks for that impotent declaration, im sure the tyrants are totally regretting their activities now.

[@jaypiazza690]

I live in California and get happy every time I see this type of update. We need to start seeing results.

[@TheCharlesAtoz]

So do I, but Cali has a way of putting a stop to this stuff. They make it murky.

[@johnkostick2041]

I gave up.

[@Tricolor40004]

Welp man just plan to move out in 5 years like I am haha

[@jayfrom805]

I'm in Cali too and I want an FN-509 Tactical so bad. 😥

[@Tricolor40004]

@ I want a shadow systems but my gosh the inflated price here is crazy

[@darrendavis4731]

We must turn CA "red" republican first.

[@DeltaLimaActual-t2o]

I hope you are Rip Van Winkle because it will be a century before that happens.

[@Way2Evl]

Did you not see the color of the state during the last election and do you not think that after the wild fires people see what the left is doing to the state? You are more than likely correct, but people's eyes are opening ​@@DeltaLimaActual-t2o

[@jessesegarra]

@@DeltaLimaActual-t2o i live here in california and you would be surprised how many are waking up here, just look at the voting map of california and compare it to 2020 and you'll see

[@concerned1313]

I have a house in one part of the state and I work in another part and keep an apartment. Generally the coasts, SF and LA are blue and the rest of the state is bright red!

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@darrendavis4731 Dude, you have a better chance of building your own spaceship in your garage and flying to another solar system! 🚀 😊

[@bryan565656]

I just did an out of state. Had to pay for the gun, my county tax and a credit card fee. Then when it hit the dealer I had to pay the 11% tax on everything I just paid plus the firearm safety certificate I had to get. They taxed everything @ 11%. Even the tax 🤬taxing, taxes 🖕🏻

[@weduhpeople8504]

Yeah that 11% extra tax is bs and needs to be removed asap!

[@THall-vi8cp]

So you paid an out-of-state retailer but it was counted toward your local FFL's gross receipts?

[@LKN4WAR]

That fkn sucks

[@d.c.1537]

In San Bernardino County in California it adds up to 18.75% tax on a firearm or ammunition purchased out of state. The FFL charges $55. to receive a firearm + $35. for paperwork/background check. A $500. gun ends up costing $683.75.

[@bryan565656]

@@THall-vi8cp yup

[@GoingBrokeHockey]

Hate the roster. It defies the text and tradition of the 2nd Amendment. For the government to tell me which guns I can have is absurd!

[@TheThinker434]

The roster is a sliding scale handgun ban. Or, it’s a ban unless it satisfies the requirements, no matter how ridiculous it is.

[@user-im6fy4qp6m]

wahh wahhhh wahhh my rights! *goes back to watching football after posting his impotent comments on a jewish platform

[@billclancy4913]

California has it's own two step approach. 1) Newsom thinks of it. 2) Bonta implements it.

[@stevendavis6601]

Thanks!

[@charleshetrick3152]

Until trumps DOJ is suing Washington state to get us our rights back I done caring. I’m glad t man is getting everything else done but waiting on scotus is a nightmare

[@UncleMilty]

👍

[@ShredGarage]

Trump isn’t pro 2A and his new head of the DOJ isnt either.

[@tommynobaka]

If only I could dream. At this point, you might be better off building a jig and home brewing

[@LKN4WAR]

The Trump DOJ in affect has unlimited funding and should set up law suits across this nation. Over and over work these states

[@larryhand7219]

Good luck with your lawsuit. 30 years from now it might be settled. Justice delayed is justice denied.

[@raymondtorres7684]

Safety handgun roster equals back door ban. Unconstitutional.

[@DesertBurst92]

I only buy off roster consignment handguns now. I refuse to buy a "Gavin Newsom Gun."

[@gwapdude66]

What's that, an AR-15 with a dildo attachment?

[@SportsKingReacts]

Can you get a off the roster handgun on consignment? And if so how would that work if it’s not a parent?

[@anthonysilva4410]

​@SportsKingReacts it works like private party transfer. We can have off roster firearms. We just can't buy them new.

[@cuztm1500]

sounds expensive

[@larryhopper7011]

There was no federal roster ban in 1791 when the 2nd Amendment was ratified.

[@DeltaLimaActual-t2o]

That means nothing unless the Black-robed SCOTUS Cowards defend Bruen and they are afraid to do so.

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@larryhopper7011 Well, I'm afraid times have changed.

[@Rahim556]

​@aquariumdude7829 but our inalienable rights haven't.

[@chethaynes5802]

Great Report. Thank You. CJTV

[@thecitizen549]

Please let the roster dissappear, if make life so much more interesting and work more enjoyable. It'd be nice to tell customers " yeah man I can get you that handgun " and not " I'm sorry, but that handgun is not on the ca handgun roster and you can't get it if you're not law enforcement "

[@aquariumdude7829]

It won't.

[@rodrigopereira3449]

California will never allow for the US CONSTITUTION to be as it is written

[@Firedrake1313]

Then maybe california should leave the union.

[@johnpopoff7950]

No it should not leave it should be forced to comply or it's leadership arrested and thrown in prison.

[@user-im6fy4qp6m]

@@Firedrake1313 no it should be retaken

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@Firedrake1313 It's not going anywhere.

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@johnpopoff7950 That won't happen either.

[@michaelperine2780]

California will simply ban any resident from bringing an off-roster firearm into California. So, a California resident could travel 4 miles across the Nevada border to Cabela's and buy an off-roster gun, but would not be able to take it home.

[@not-fishing4730]

True but they've done that with ammo and guess how that is working.

[@PoliticallyInsensitive]

Unless they're going to set up vehicle checkpoints at the border how are they going to know?

[@air-vacsystemsinc.7770]

The ban you describe is already in place here in California.

[@michaelperine2780]

@@PoliticallyInsensitive It happens all the time. You get in an accident and are injured. You go to the hospital and then to jail. You break up with a girlfriend, she snitches you to the cops. Etc.

[@Kevin-s7s]

You have to be a resident of the state to buy a gun

[@grumpyoldretiredcop8382]

Yeah, one little catch... CA will prohibit "importing" the firearm because CA doesn't think they're a state in the United States. Good luck with that.

[@matthewfortin4335]

Massachusetts has now passed a law to include long guns on a roster! We are fighting Chapter 135 as we speak! Several lawsuits are already filed here!

Good luck! I hope you'll still be with us in 50 years when it makes it to the SCOTUS 😂🤣😁😆 Me, I got sick of CT trampling on my rights and moved to NH.

[@matthewfortin4335]

Believe me I know. I am right behind you. We are leaving in just 24 months. The countdown is on! We are heading to NH. Let's see if we can make NH Red again!

[@JaimeRodriguez-ju9rb]

Freedom!! Let’s go

[@TravisL.Desmadreson]

If it ever does get corrected, the states with the rosters should be made to pay restitution to the citizens who bought during the roster.

[@jager2235]

Rip California gun stores

[@heshmobster]

So sad that CZ is off the roster 😞😞😞😞😞 here in Gay CA

[@shawn57779]

yup! im happy i picked up a PCR compact last year. really sucks!

[@CSGATI]

It is not about the state you live in it is what country we are in.

[@cyrusamaria]

Funny enough in California last year they VERY QUIETLY🤫 decriminalized Billy Clubs and Batons. You can buy them and carry them now, while before it was a Felony.

[@ExTRElMlE]

Man I hope this pass!!! Keep us posted.!

[@administrator7573]

I thought the US Senate had introduced SB1224, the Modern Firearms Safety Act that was designed to accomplish this same end by prohibiting states from requiring loaded chamber indicators, magazine disconnect mechanisms, and microstamping for handgun sales?

[@meritholdingllc123]

I often wondered why I could only buy a gun in my own state (jumping through hoops not withstanding). Thank you.

[@TRUTHBYFACT-hd8rs]

Interesting, but coast to coast Constitutional Carry based on our 2A Right is what needs to happen!

[@IraHayes1775]

Thank you for your updates. I am in California and am looking forward to some movement in the abolishment of these unconstitutional laws.

[@unreal203]

So no news, just more lawsuits in addition to the existing lawsuits that have been going on for decades. Joy.

[@user60521123]

The roster is just an under-handed way of banning all semiautomatic handguns. CA legislators have been on-record admitting it.

[@nicroberts8587]

I'm in California as well as many other people live in California that need help. we need this tyranny out of here.

[@joemarchinski914]

The 28th amendment,. The Right to shop in any state shall not be infringed

[@TheTorlock]

Early 1900s is pretty old. Predates like 4 or 5 states being part of the country soo...to consider the last 100 years unimportant to our legal system for the sake of firearm transfers is pretty crazy

[@davek5027]

Sure. Newsom will just go “Ya got me, Supreme Court! I’m canceling all rosters!” Democrats don’t give a rip about court oulings. The California roster ain’t going anywhere

[@1scooterpilot1]

California history on two levels is always consistent: 1. California ignores Federals laws and SCOTUS. Calif has validated this by passing legislation which ignores Federal law and SCOTUS decisions. 2. If it's in litigation California has the 9th District Court of Appeals in its back pocket. Nothing will happen in Cali....they will ignore the law with IMPUNITY as they always do. Everyone said SNOPES was a shoe for SCOTUS to accept this term. How did that work out for you? "To consider judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy." Thomas Jefferson

[@TRUTHBYFACT-hd8rs]

About time !!!😊❤

[@Joseph-u3t2n]

I don't understand why I have to live in the state to purchase a firearm. It is our constitutional right and the unconstitutional 4473 form is the same in every state so I really don't get this crap. I do believe that the United States Supreme Court needs to just rule that states can not make their own laws, rules or provisions for any of our constitutional rights and stop wasting time by kicking crap down to lower courts. Just make a final ruling that says no state can ever infringe on any constitutional right period.

[@Jjsaba2008]

Lawsuit , lawsuit, lawsuit , never any results it’s frustrating

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@Jjsaba2008 Not true! A bunch of lawyers got rich! 😆

[@corona_beforecorona]

That would be amazing. The extra CA tax is ridiculous.

[@Doc.Holiday]

Get out of California… strike! Let the state wallow in ignorance!

[@CLARKaka]

Trump save U.S now

[@M447DT]

He won't, he doesn't give a crap about our second amendment rights

[@weduhpeople8504]

@@M447DTThen why did he get rid of the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention recently?

[@M447DT]

@@weduhpeople8504 I must have missed it. What's that?

[@GluteusMaximus808]

@@M447DTgoogle is your friend.

[@darkwarrior_pops]

@@weduhpeople8504what the hell is that?

[@rongrindstaff3027]

That is how it SHOULD BE, NICS IS THE SAME IN ALL STATES, NEVER COULD UNDERSTAND THIS UNCONDITIONAL LAW .

[@ronwise1745]

Unfortunately, I live in MD and we have a roster and a 1 week wait on handgun purchases. The state police do the background check for handguns, not the FFL. They look deeper into the background, like checking to see if the pistol is reported stolen and checking if you have a medical marijuana card.

[@Steamrunner]

WA uses the WSP for background checks and a 10 business day wait, plus a permission slip.

[@ronwise1745]

@@Steamrunneryea MD also requires you to purchase a special license before you can purchase a pistol and it requires a training class along with shooting

[@davidhawkins847]

Unfortunately, you're wrong regarding HOW states implement background checks. There are several states that do their OWN background checks, that includes checking NICS but is more comprehensive. I don't see this going through without some major issues that are likely to make it fail. This MIGHT get applied regarding handguns in those states that use NICS only though.

[@TheologyJ]

So nothing changes right 🥱

[@aquariumdude7829]

Basically.

[@davidbladen5667]

You can thank kumala harris for the handgun roster in kalifornia. She ok'd microstamping of handguns even though it didn't exist🤪🤪🤪🤪

[@kevos823]

It might help take down the state rosters, and state import laws but that will still take lawsuits and time but all the help we can get the better

[@ssparrrkyy]

If states can defy Federal laws, maybe Federal government should have conditional rules wrt to Federal funding.

[@johnbasler4119]

California doesn’t follow the constitution now because they choose not to. What would change?

[@661fish4]

There is no hope in California. It will never happen.

[@suggashayne7505]

Seems like 10 years ago there were videos titled, “END OF THE CALIFORNIA ROSTER” or “10 DAY WAITING PERIOD OVERTURNED!” I’m still in ca and have spent two months trying to buy a gun thanks to “undermined delays”. I’ve never heard of these before it happened to me for the first time but things are not getting better any time soon.

[@larelare1]

You might consider getting a UPIN in order to identify better and not get undetermined status.

[@bigc2092]

I’ll bet you every dollar I have that California will not comply 1 bit

[@doc8579]

Just one of the changes that must be made. Places like NJ also need to have mag bans overturned and huge costs for carry rights. $400 for a two year carry license. $20” to the local/state government and $200 for education/qualification. We The People shouldn’t have to pay this much for a so called right.

[@not-fishing4730]

Well California says 'here hold my designer beer'. My costs have been $1,000 per year for the last ten years here in California for a CCW (renewed every other year). My Utah non-resident CCW (useful in more states) is $75 every FIVE years.

[@e7cortez]

The way the court system works today between 12 to 15 years down the road before the rectify this issue

[@concerned1313]

The only problem with going "national" verses each state is that if you lose a right, it is for the whole country, not just one state...

[@user-im6fy4qp6m]

i agree, we should all have the right to ban handgun sales in every state

[@gemm5050]

Hold your breathe, for 20 years.

[@gomcse]

Right?! We NEVER win.

[@JamesReedy]

I’d goto Nevada just to get around the 11% excise tax. Between transferring to a local FFL plus the excise tax the cost of acquiring new guns has gotten insane.

[@mechanicjamz]

WA passed a bill to where you have to pay to have the privilege of your 2A of 25k per gun

[@blainelee8021]

That has not passed.

[@mechanicjamz]

@blainelee8021 it will since there are no Republicans or anyone willing to fight against it people of WA will comply as always. Eventually they will just turn yellow and give up their guns

[@ArsacioJJulioJr]

Yes, I've been saying this for years. At the end on judgement with the 2A, Bruin is applied or attached . This way in the future it not likely to be overturned.

[@crazydave069]

People from NY and Massachusetts can't buy long guns here in Maine, because of the laws from those states. Over covid lockdowns a friend from NY was staying here, and he had to change his residency to Maine before he could buy the rifle and the shotgun he wanted.

[@chuckconner5317]

As someone who has lived in California and held an FFL License in the 80’s. I could buy guns from suppliers from out of state without a problem. But California changed the laws and when I went to renew my FFL it was not renewed because California changed the laws and I no longer met the requirements they set. Removing the roster would eventually allow Californians to buy the guns no longer on the roster because manufacturers would start shipping guns that were not available because of the roster to California gun stores and distributors! But it no longer matters to me as I am one of many that has decided to leave California.

[@jamulAK]

California will simply say " Yes, you can buy it, BUT you cannot possess it or bring it into California unless its on the roster! In fact we will extend this to any non roster firearms." This will ban anyone moving to California from bringing all of their firearms with them and eliminate person to person transfers.

[@tdo7125]

Many lawsuits, so little results, but I’m hopeful.

[@fruck2896]

Don’t be.

[@ltanthrax8435]

What sucks is if your home state has wait periods. It should be pretty simple to do a background check in any state and just query your home state. Or allow a special exemption for ccw holders.

[@THall-vi8cp]

Then the individual nanny states create state-level bans on importing weapons and require all firearms to be transferred through an FFL within their own borders. The CA legislature would zip that through in a day, maybe two.

[@Arcane_Native]

As a Comifornia resident I can say with certainty that even if this did go through, there is a no "ghost" or "cold" gun law preventing us from having or owning a gun in the state that is not registered to you. Yes, obviously they wouldn't know but trying to stay law abiding would mean that even if you were able buy a gun in a state, if that state did not have a firearms registry that was attached to California no one would know you had the firearm and therefore if you were caught with it in California you would lose your right to bear arms. Obviously, this would be a huge step forward but unfortunately for us in the unfree state it would probably change very little. P.S. We are no longer required to have the micro stamping for our rostered handguns, so we are slowly getting new guns put onto the roster.

[@leroyfisher2138]

California unfortunately will close that loophole if they think that's going to pass.

[@headhuntersixx8164]

Nevadans would hate this law. All their gun stores would be sold out due to Californians. 🤣🤣🤣

[@rufusmacck3712]

Oh come on headhuntersixx, I’m sure you Nevadans would be buying all of our 10 rd magazines and fish tail griped “assault” rifles. You know you want one! Heck you want dozens of them!

[@headhuntersixx8164]

@ you got me wrong buddy. I’m a Californian. I would be one of the buyers of Nevada guns! 🤣🤣🤣

[@rufusmacck3712]

@@headhuntersixx8164 👍 You and me both!

[@bojangles6353]

Out of state purchase and the handgun roster are two different laws. I can go out of state and buy ammo and fireworks. But its illegal to bring them into California. This will be the same thing.

[@donnyhollywood]

Great work

[@TheCharlesAtoz]

Great video as usual.

[@ReversePolarity5]

This is amazing! But it seems too good to be an eventual truth. I think states, like California, would just make a law to criminalize a California resident from bringing a gun purchased elsewhere back into their state.

[@shadowveil478]

I wanted a colt 1911 .45acp and when I went to search for one, oh hey they are banned in Cali, one of the most iconic handguns historically by brand as well, I have an me garand so having a colt would really be nice, I had to settle with a rock island armoury 1911, still a good handgun

[@tomedgar4375]

Proper fees paid or extortion?

[@the305hauler]

Booyah 👊🏽 😁 👍🏽 🇺🇸 2A

[@spudmanwp]

Not sure abut other States, but here in CA it is against State law to bring any off-roster handgun in from outside of the State, regardless of the source. Striking down the Federal law on buying a handgun (or any gun) in another State will not affect this.

[@LTYTACCT]

This lawsuit has very little chance of succeeding.

[@DS-gt1ft]

Great. Wake me when SCOTUS rules on it.

[@debbievines9872]

More like dig me up.

[@Nevets1970]

“YOUR state handgun rosters”? Uhhh, I live in Florida. Rosters? We don’t need no stinking Rosters! lol

[@oldmarine312]

best news since Micro-Stamping was tossed out!

[@captaincrunch5878]

I'm hoping Trump will do something about Our 2nd Amendment Rights across all states. I served in the military Honerable DD214 I served the Constitution and my Constitution doesn't serve me, Why ? Why are unconstitutional laws being made and enforced upon we the people ? No matter the state, the Constitution is the law of the land period. Oh except California and, and ,and, When it comes to Rights States shouldn't be treated as separate country's we are the United States not the Separate States.. Trump please fix this problem.

[@tbohn10]

Trump doesnt care about your rights bro. He hates guns as mych as any lib

[@PoliticallyInsensitive]

When you got out the military moved you one last time. YOU chose California. It's not that the Constitution isn't serving you; your state isn't recognizing your basic natural rights. As a matter of fact, you're still obligated to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America."

[@Official.LuCien.Kane.]

Don't keep your hopes up..!!!

[@PJ_Perry]

I swear i mix up you and hegshot .yall look alike 😂

[@pewpewlife8210]

California will appeal it like always same old crap

[@frankm2385]

GN, enemy of the state.

[@renehernandez6905]

@@frankm2385yes sir.GN=grabbin’ nuisance

[@TheCharlesAtoz]

@@frankm2385 Preach it brother.

[@gotsloco1810]

The case was filed in Texas. California can only file an amicus brief. California is not a direct party to the case.

[@pewpewlife8210]

@ same words same cases getting dragged on for months and years

[@9realitycheck9]

Thank you for the content. I'm sorry I am unable to financially afford to support your work. Maybe someday. KUDOS God Bless

[@brendenphillips3013]

stop pulling on my heart strings!!!

[@rayb9053]

Even if this lawsuit is successful, CA will still ban the possession of the firearm purchased in another state once you bring it back into CA ...

[@rhekman]

The best part of this lawsuit is how it cites the Mance decision directly and uses its own findings of fact against the Nonresident Handgun Purchase Ban. So the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2018 that while there was nothing in the text of the Constitution that allowed the ban, and there was no law before the early 1900s showing a tradition of interstate bans, it still found there was a government interest that outweighed citizen's rights. We now have Bruen ruling a "two-step test is one step too far", so the 5th Circuit will have to eat their words. Muah, chef's kiss 🧑‍🍳💋

[@paulash1770]

Sure, it would circumvent the roster, but it does nothing for the registration requirements. I’d still have to register any handgun I buy in order to add it to my California CCW

[@Zay_TheBugGuy619]

Exactly! It’s been a long time coming!

[@aquariumdude7829]

Nothing has changed.

[@Zay_TheBugGuy619]

@ yes I know, but at least it’s a step in the right direction rather than going backwards

[@MW-jj1rn]

This must go through, this would be outstanding!

[@Will-W]

They would simply amend the law to be similar to magazines. "Illegal to import across state lines unless cop/etc."

[@scottscheuerman8714]

This might would work here in Colorado if they happen to pass the assault weapons ban which is nothing but a full semiautomatic gun ban

[@aldomartinez3943]

“The end of all handgun rosters…’in maybe the next term….maybe’”

[@jackwright9102]

Keep on rolling 😊

[@SLAPNTZ_MCCOY]

Don’t do this, don’t give me hope like this

[@johnshaft5613]

Constructive criticism here....your titles for your videos are gradually becoming more and more misleading and "click-baity", very much like a KZbin attorney who runs a channel much like yours whom I will no longer watch because that crap drives me crazy.

[@aquariumdude7829]

@@johnshaft5613 He's got to keep those ad revenues coming at all costs! 😊

[@junicohen7918]

Sure.