Get my derivative notes on my Patron 👉 www.patreon.com/posts/calc-1-table-98759206
@Gezraf9 ай бұрын
great. now we have to remember it backwards for integration 😭🙏
@kabir_dot_exe9 ай бұрын
Life will give you much harder problems than that. Get used to it, it is a meaningful struggle
@riader9 ай бұрын
@@kabir_dot_exe spoken
@Why_did_YouTube_add_handles9 ай бұрын
@@longlivedemocracy10123 surprisingly good advice
@0llie9 ай бұрын
bro, if you remember it one way, you have it both ways 😂
@wes96279 ай бұрын
Think retromingent and you'll be OK.
@wes96279 ай бұрын
I'm impressed that bprp can flip two or three color markers with hand while holding a microphone with the other hand and not make a mistake while rattling off 16 minutes worth of complicated derivatives.
@bprpcalculusbasics9 ай бұрын
Lol thanks
@justsaadunoyeah12349 ай бұрын
This is a really informative video! I am one of your biggest fans, and I am really happy about this video. Now I won't have to go to 200 billion Google websites just to get some obscure formula I don't remember. Thank you so much!!!
@bprpcalculusbasics8 ай бұрын
Glad to hear! Thank you very much!
@danielkovacs68099 ай бұрын
This is good. Now prove all of them by definition. :)
@jopetdevera9 ай бұрын
Actually having to evaluate the limit of sin x/x as x -> 0 aka The Limit.. 💀
@thexoxob94483 ай бұрын
the reason the abs value is there on derivatives of inverse sec and csc is because the square root is "multivalued". For negative x, the square root would have been negative, which accounts for the abs value
@mahdikissoum29139 ай бұрын
Now, for the same usual function, done for integrals !
@timeless_escapades3 ай бұрын
thank you for this video!! it's exactly what i needed
@cdkw82549 ай бұрын
I have a exam in a week, this will surely help!
@ARS-fi5dpАй бұрын
Thank you 🌷
@aquss339 ай бұрын
Dayum, finally a video like this! Thanks, everything in one place and nicely explained!
@dinofunplay13809 ай бұрын
This is super useful!
@HeyKevinYT9 ай бұрын
The way I was first taught to remember the Quotient Rule, and I still use it today, is to recite the phrase "low d-high minus high d-low over low-squared" lol
@DarkNight7689 ай бұрын
Very good video can you make a video on how find A ,B and C in partial fractions thank you ❤
@General12th9 ай бұрын
One d-two plus two d-one. Low d-high minus high d-low. Square the bottom and away we go.
@juanavelinobobadillabravo9 ай бұрын
Touche, elemental mi querido Watson.
@hafizusamabhutta3 ай бұрын
Hyperbolic trick functions?
@kavinesh_the_legend9 ай бұрын
Can do a video like this for integration, please
@teaformulamaths9 ай бұрын
Aren't they all in the text book? :D
@kavinesh_the_legend9 ай бұрын
I have a question in the differentiation of x^x why can't we write it as follow: =(x.x^x-1) =x²^x-1 =x^2x-2
@BraedenHill5369 ай бұрын
First of all, x * x^x-1 = x^x not x^2^x-1 Secondly, when the power is a function the power rule cannot be used
@bprpcalculusbasics9 ай бұрын
Here February 17, 2024 kzbin.info/www/bejne/aF7Cgn58Z9yoesU
@EyeSooGuy9 ай бұрын
Hey Steve. Explain antiderivatives to us! 😊
@bprpcalculusbasics9 ай бұрын
Maybe watch this video backwards?
@EyeSooGuy9 ай бұрын
@@bprpcalculusbasics ah, that’s right.
@EyeSooGuy9 ай бұрын
@@bprpcalculusbasics also, since I’m in Info Tech, I had to learn computer science and the bases of math (binary, octal, decimal, hexadecimal, base32, base64 and base85). What I’m curious to know is, can all of the bases apply to arithmetic, algebra, trig/geo, calculus, and finally to the top, analysis?
@unni62939 ай бұрын
Hi, can you say if there is a way to know if a number is prime or not using calculus, it would be great if there exists a method like that, please say if there are alternative methods also other than calculus
@teaformulamaths9 ай бұрын
Curious - what is your definition of a prime number?
@carultch8 ай бұрын
Whether or not a number is prime, has nothing to do with calculus. It's a question for number theory. The way to determine whether or not a number is prime, is to test it for divisibility of all possible prime factors, up to its square root. Once you rule out all prime factors, you prove the number is prime. If you were writing a computer code to do this, keeping track of all the prime numbers is probably a difficult way to do it, so a likely strategy you'd take is to test the candidates for prime numbers. You'd first test the 1-digit cases, like 2, 3, 5, and 7. Once you get to 2-digit numbers, you only need to test numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, and 9. After 20, you can also rule out candidates with digits that add up to a multiple of 3 (a test for divisibility by 3), and candidates with an alternating digit sum of zero (or a multiple of 11), a test for divisibility by 11.
@unni62938 ай бұрын
@@teaformulamaths , so my definition for a prime number is that it is a number that is only divisible by 1 and the number itself
@unni62938 ай бұрын
@@teaformulamaths hi!, thanks for responding, prime numbers have nothing to do with calculus I know but I have seen great maths and physics geniuses use calculus to solve problems and find things where you would never imagine calculus would be used, so I was curious if those people or anyone had found a way to prove if a number is prime or not using calculus. And the method you talked about is the obvious way but the slowest and the most dreadful way.
@teaformulamaths8 ай бұрын
@@unni6293 This is the standard definition, it's simple really. However prime numbers are not yet fully defined. By using calculus, we would need to relate the numbers to a geometrical pattern or a function. I have seen this defined in a different base, if you're interested?
@ThePeterDislikeShow9 ай бұрын
I hate how sin^2 means sine squared while sin^-1 means inverse sine. So inconsistent!
@teaformulamaths9 ай бұрын
I blame calculator companies
@ThePeterDislikeShow9 ай бұрын
@@teaformulamaths why?
@teaformulamaths9 ай бұрын
@@ThePeterDislikeShow Because they perpetuate the notation on the calculator 😄 I don't know where it began but it's confusing
@teaformulamaths9 ай бұрын
@@ThePeterDislikeShow Just a little inside joke 😄🙏
@carultch8 ай бұрын
@@teaformulamaths The superscript "-1" to indicate inverse function, has been a mature concept before calculators were invented. Sure, calculator manufacturers adopted the notation, over much clearer notations like "arc-", "a-", and "anti-", and probably popularized it more than it was used in the days of purely handwritten math. It's unfortunate that we have three inconsistent applications of superscript to concern ourselves with in function notation (exponentiation, derivative level, and iteration level), but that's why we need to define our terms in words as well, to communicate with others. And become familiar with context A superscript "-1" meaning inverse, means an iteration of the function to the negative first degree.
@pchevasath9 ай бұрын
So secant is the same as the derivative of arcsin?
@Lexxaro9 ай бұрын
No, secant and arcsine don't have much to do with eachother. sec(x) is just 1/cos(x). Also he calls arcsine sine inverse or sin^-1(x) in this video which is just another name for it, as it is the inverse function of sine: arcsin(sin(x)) = x