Hi friends! You can find the worksheet discussed in this video at this link here: drive.google.com/drive/u/2/folders/1AKTYC6GcpsI7ZnKQEWGIjk2-g6P_R5hR Also, please check out my original video explaining the basics of entropy here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5iTmaibhN6id9k Thanks as always for your support :)
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hi parth what textbook did you use in your undergrad and grad for general relativity
@adventuresoflife4863 жыл бұрын
Is there no formula to find microstates???
@sunithasomalingam26684 жыл бұрын
Hello, First time visited this channel. I'm a High school student... Loved this channel... From India.. ❤️😍😍
@saptarshimondal73244 жыл бұрын
I'm very thankful to you Parth... Nowadays, I am going through classical thermodynamics...so this will help me a lot🙏💫💓
@shristithakur51073 жыл бұрын
Your videos help us visualise topics (which is rare and maths we can handle ourselves). Please more videos on thermodynamics
@anjana80024 жыл бұрын
You never fail to impress me.
@tahashariff224 жыл бұрын
Very clearly explained 👌. Hats off to u man🤟
@szymondudzinski6661 Жыл бұрын
This is a nice exercise in combinatorics, which is great because even as a math lover, I suck at combinatorics lol
@anant_singh4 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation as always, btw waiting for your video on Double-slit experiment.
@ramanunnikrishnan73544 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I expected a reply for that particular problem and instead got a video explaining it.
@samferrer Жыл бұрын
I enjoy your videos very much. Can you recommend literature about mathematics and physics? Specially subjects about thermodynamics, statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics.
@saptarshimondal73244 жыл бұрын
Please make a series of video regarding grad,div,curl(physical interpretation)...🙏🙏💫💓
@doinggood35644 жыл бұрын
physics videos by eugene khutoryansky..... You can refer this one
@sarniva4 жыл бұрын
Saptarshi Mondal where are u from?
@saptarshimondal73244 жыл бұрын
@@sarniva I'm from West Bengal
@sarniva4 жыл бұрын
@@saptarshimondal7324 Jnv?
@saptarshimondal73244 жыл бұрын
@@sarniva No brother... where r u from??
@ashrafmuhammad255 Жыл бұрын
Sir, its application is not explained, however, hats off to you. you are brilliant.
@AndrewDotsonvideos4 жыл бұрын
maxwells demon video wen?
@ParthGChannel4 жыл бұрын
The time is almost upon us :D
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hi andrew
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hey guys andrew and parth please tell me what books you guys used in undergrad and grad for general relativity
@djt6fan2 жыл бұрын
How to interpret the thermodynamical formula of entropy? What is its origin (how did Clausius come up with it)? How can we draw the conclusion of disorderliness from this formula?
@otakarbeinhauer3 жыл бұрын
The title of this video is not really representative of this video's content, but i really like your clarity when explaining intermediate topics.
@doinggood35644 жыл бұрын
Still can't wait for your video on NAVIER STOKE'S EQUATION
@AT-pr8ur4 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about Fusion and fission ? Explaining these two things using Conservation of energy. I have read about ITER project , a fusion reactor that would have a gain factor of 10. 50 MW input energy and 500MW output energy.
@zetacrucis6813 жыл бұрын
This vid needs a follow-up on indistinguishable particles.
@enderdelphiki41074 жыл бұрын
Is there some type of formula that we could use so that we dont have to find all the microstates by brute force?
@shivam51053 жыл бұрын
For the last 12 Microstates in the q in the document, you can use the formula 4C2(4 choose 2), wherein you choose 2 particles out of the 4 to arrange in the 2 other choices for microstates, and the arranging is done in 2! (2 factorial) = 2 ways, which gives a total of 12 ways (4C2 x 2)
@shivam51053 жыл бұрын
Similarly, for the first 4 microstates, you choose one particles (4C1) and arrange it in the choices for microstates which is only one in this case, 4E (1! = 1) thus the number of microstates are 4C1x 1! = 4, similarly for the next 4
@lakshthaker63794 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on Copenhagen interpretation or Pauli exclusion principle please .. Humble request
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Ya pauli exclusion principle is mind blowing
@xiaoshen1944 жыл бұрын
Do you use Halliday Resnick? Or which book do you use?
@mibrahim42454 жыл бұрын
For those who're asking about the reason of using the natural logarithm in the equation, I'm not so sure, but sometimes in engineering we use the logarithm to scale down certain quantities if they are too large "in this case the microstates" .. for example, in antenna power we use the logarithm to get the 'decibels' instead of the crazy large power quantities in watts.. at the same time it still encodes the same information about the antenna gain..
@rinsim3 жыл бұрын
The reason of using the ln is to get a quantity which is additive (extensive). The total number of microstates of 2 combined systems is the product of the microstates of the individual systems. Taking the ln, you have the sum. So the entropy becomes an extensive property which is nice.
@mibrahim42453 жыл бұрын
@@rinsim hi, Decibels are also added instead of relatively complex math..
@sarniva4 жыл бұрын
Hi partg I don't understand why natural logarithm is used in this formula i go through the Wikipedia link that u gave but still didn't get it well, Can u suggest me a youtube channel or particularly a video where i can understand why natural logarithm are used in physics and chemistry formula. Btw love ur videos , love from India ❤️🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@mibrahim42454 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure, but sometimes in engineering we use the logarithm to scale down certain quantities if they are large "in this case the microstates" .. for example in antenna power we use the logarithm to get the decibels instead of the crazy power quantities in watts.. still encodes the same information about the antenna gain..
@sarniva4 жыл бұрын
@@mibrahim4245thank u 🤗👍 But i understand why logarithm are used. But don't know why natural logarithm are used in most of the case?
@mibrahim42454 жыл бұрын
@@sarniva I've read some answers about that, some of them said its good because of the additive property where you sometimes need to multiply two microstates and by using the logarithm you can just add them which makes life easier, and more other reasons.. BUT there was no reason of why using the natural logarithm instead of the logarithm to the base ten ! in the end, it won't make a difference, e to the what gives an answer or ten to the what gives an answer...
@NEILALEXANDERMADRIGAL4 жыл бұрын
Hello! Any plans of doing the Curls of Maxwell equations? :))
@rinsim3 жыл бұрын
Given the number of particles n and the total level of energy m, the number of microstates is bincoeff(m-1,n-1). So for n=4 and m=7 we have 20 indeed. What's the formula to get the number of macrostates which is 3 in this case (i.e. the permutation doesn't matter)? In other words I want to solve the stars and bars problem with indistinguishable bins.
@ethanlawrence28252 жыл бұрын
I think, and I'm not exactly 100% sure, you divide by n!
@amaralingeshwarakona3 жыл бұрын
Good way of teaching with animation drawing great
@ericgrosch80732 жыл бұрын
This seems to me to be combinatorial mumbo-jumbo, with no connection to delta Q(1/T2 - 1/T1), the concept of entropy from macro-thermodynamics.
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hi parth tell me about the books "you" used for general relativity in undergrad and grad please
@internationalfatherinlaw55854 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, I also need some for basic level I am in 10th class cbse (India). I want to understand quantumn mechanics,General relativity with maths but I do not know all basics so it is very tough and I have not started yet!
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
@@internationalfatherinlaw5585 see theoretical minimum leonard susskind
@abhinavjoshi48734 жыл бұрын
Niket M first thing you’re gonna have to learn is calculus, they start with go through the basics of calc in 11th in cbse, and properly teach it in 12th, so you can get a headstart by doing it now.
@gabisimo_4 жыл бұрын
If it is of any help the books by B. Schutz or S. Carroll are standard for GR, but personally I found Grфn & Hervik pretty useful.
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
@@gabisimo_ thanks
@nvnrmchl4 жыл бұрын
cool, no pun intended
@hamdaniyusuf_dani4 жыл бұрын
Can the energy of a particle be 0?
@playitback-os7mh4 жыл бұрын
Why makes entropy generation energy useless? Isnt it still available?
@aodoemela4 жыл бұрын
Can you make a physics vs engineering video?
@anand8514 жыл бұрын
LOVE IT .∰∞
@Radostronomy4 жыл бұрын
sir plz make a video on Quantum field theory..
@dnstone11274 жыл бұрын
So what is the natural log of 20 ?
@jatin26364 жыл бұрын
Hey does an electron gain mass when it is excited to higher energy state.
@babayaga5d4204 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing it doesn't
@jatin26364 жыл бұрын
@@babayaga5d420 I think it should since E=mc² when electron return to its ground state the energy is lost as em radiation
@babayaga5d4204 жыл бұрын
@@jatin2636 but doesn't the energy absorbed used to increase the energy state? I mean an exited electron moves farther from the nucleus. Which requires energy. And the em wave is the outcome of a moving electron (in this case jumping down). This is also used in antennas. I might be wrong I'm no physicist. And highschool textbooks don't really teach quantum mechanics that deeply. But atomics bomb use the same equation. Which is scary to think that 2gs of mass can destroy cities.
@jatin26364 жыл бұрын
@@babayaga5d420 👍
@yesnobabu4 жыл бұрын
You can use combinations formula nCr ,to calculate all combination of (n) objects for a different states(r) of samples.4c1,4c2 4c3, 4c4 to explain the total possible combinations.....For every situation .....But calculating every possible situation makes it lengthy.....Is it not ??.....
@ParthGChannel4 жыл бұрын
You're right! But it is important to do the full calculation at least once so you get a good sense of how counting microstates actually works. And then we can use other methods to do it quickly.
@mach25704 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@ParthGChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much :D
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hi parth also tell me how can i study at Oxford for free are there any scholarships like that? please tell me
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
Hi parth please recommend me a book to learn general relativity except sean carrolls and kip thrones and assume that iam a 9th grader
@rajaradi8024 жыл бұрын
@Dirk Knight just curious which university are you studying
@CrLm70ftbl4 жыл бұрын
What's up!
@adventuresoflife4863 жыл бұрын
Is there no formula for finding microstates??????
@gabirov3 жыл бұрын
Yes, you can do it with combinations with repetition, the "balls and walls (or boxes)" problem. But you have to group things correctly, for this case you can't apply the formula directly because in every "box" (or between walls) there's always one or more "balls"; the balls are the energy units, and the lowest energy for a particle (box, or between walls) is 1.
@internationalfatherinlaw55854 жыл бұрын
Are you a full time youtuber?
@muntequa4 жыл бұрын
Maxwell's 4th equation plss
@ordinaryclass85084 жыл бұрын
Parth you are the next einstein.
@radha_tanvi3 жыл бұрын
❤️
@deepakkadam87894 жыл бұрын
In which University your studying? In which country?
@elizabethmeghana96144 жыл бұрын
hi parth , your glasses also participate in the video , it scatters light , scattered light falls on your eyelids , have you observed this !!!
@photonicsauce77294 жыл бұрын
First!
@ParthGChannel4 жыл бұрын
Hi :D
@maxwellsequation48874 жыл бұрын
Once, I was as early that big bang was still happening
@RBSMathletics4 жыл бұрын
e m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y5m7oH-ldraHock
@omniyambot98764 жыл бұрын
as curious idiot highschooler I've learned so much from you, but what? 2 hours and less than a thousand views? sad but people aren't that much interested in these kinds of topics anymore.
@ParthGChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the lovely comment :) Glad you found the video helpful!
@omniyambot98764 жыл бұрын
@@ParthGChannel definitely would always share your channel!
@mohammadrashedkhan4864 жыл бұрын
You are looking weird bro.
@_RIBOT_4 жыл бұрын
Is there an equation we can use that doesn’t require diagraming every possible particle configuration = 7e?
@rinsim3 жыл бұрын
If you have n particles and the total energy is mE, the number of microstates should be the binomial coefficient of m-1 over n-1. In the example with 4 particles and a total energy of 7 you would have 6!/(3!3!) = 20 indeed. I have demonstrated this formula up to n=4 and any m (with of course m >= n). For higher n I think the formula can be demonstrated by induction for any n, although I didn't manage to achieve that.