Another thing I love about Baldwin is that Matthias Baldwin was also an abolitionist. He was an outspoken supporter for the abolition of slavery in the United States, a position that was used against him and his firm by competitors eager to sell locomotives to railroads based in the slaveholding South. In 1835, he donated money to establish a school for African-American children in Philadelphia and continued to pay the teachers' salaries out of his own pocket for years thereafter. Baldwin was a member of the 1837 Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention and emerged as a defender of voting rights for the state's black male citizens.
@0fficialdregs Жыл бұрын
hell yeah!!!!
@the101stdalmatian8 Жыл бұрын
His statue was also defaced during the 2020 riots.
@vincentberkan605 Жыл бұрын
@@the101stdalmatian8 I know. Someone didn't do their research.
@user-gu7yo5yn9g Жыл бұрын
@@the101stdalmatian8 shows where the real racism is. They see an old white guy and immediately assume racist slave owner bs.
@jpoppinga8417 Жыл бұрын
@vincentberkan605 They want to destroy. They really don't care who the statue is, or their history. It just a statue for them to deface.
@Nightmare_52 Жыл бұрын
i was really happy with how they handled things, no corruption, paying their workers properly, pioneering technology, until they stopped looking to the future
@danbernstein4694 Жыл бұрын
My father was the industrial real estate broker who handled the sale of the Eddystone plant to Vertol, now Boeing Vertol. When the deal was done, he had to figure out what to with the life size statue of Matthais Baldwin. My mother refused to let him put it in our back garden. I think it was donated to county historical society.
@presbyterosBassI Жыл бұрын
Is it the one on the north side of Philadelphia City Hall?
@OldsVistaCruiser Жыл бұрын
Or is it the one in the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania in Strasburg?
@danbernstein4694 Жыл бұрын
@@OldsVistaCruiser its not the one at City Hall. But since it is not now in the Delco Historical Society, it may very well be in Strasburg. I will take a look there sometime. Thanks
@OldsVistaCruiser Жыл бұрын
@danbernstein4694 - The one in Strasburg is at the northeast corner of the train hall and is slightly larger than life-size.
@danbernstein4694 Жыл бұрын
@@OldsVistaCruiser that sounds like the one that was at the plant!
@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014 Жыл бұрын
There were only few railroads that ordered more steam locomotives from ALCO than Baldwin, like Union Pacific and New York Central. Just shows how dominant Baldwin was in the golden age of steam
@michigandon Жыл бұрын
Pick up any paperback Western novel, and all they talk about is Baldwin locomotives any time there's a train scene.
@dodge-ut6ti Жыл бұрын
The Rutland bought from Alco.
@trainsbyben Жыл бұрын
Can't add much to the content except that it was informative and interesting. The steamers were all but gone by the time I arrived in 1956. Rode my first train in the 1st grade with my class on a 20 or so mile trip to a little town north of our town and rode a school bus on the newly constructed Interstate 75 back to our school. It is still a fond memory, and now I video trains for you tube. Still love trains! Come to a look.
@Transit_Biker Жыл бұрын
As someone who lives in an area where Budd and Baldwin both had their main presence, the stories of their downfall is always so frustrating.
@Tommy2tone762 Жыл бұрын
Funny I feel the same living in the Detroit area. The Big 3 Legacy can't make a dime on electrics and are like Baldwin being so far behind. It's funny but it's not because all of us will pay the price. What if they just can never catch up?
@mityace Жыл бұрын
SMS in New Jersey is famous for continuing to run Baldwin diesels. Growth and the normal issues of running museum pieces forced SMS to pick up some used EMDs as well.
@michigandon Жыл бұрын
They had the two former Copper Range DS-4-4-1000s at one point. Not sure if they still do or not.
@brianferus9292 Жыл бұрын
My father started to work at the Eddystone plant before the war. He tried to enlist after Pearl Harbour and when he told them where he worked they told him to go back to work. Told me the made quite a lot of engines for Russia.
@xXx_ToxicPea_xXx Жыл бұрын
I noticed that much of the footage depicting the manufacture of steam locomotives comes from a 1935 documentary titled “No. 6237 a Study in Steel” by the LMS. It’s a great documentary worth watching.
@irishtank42 Жыл бұрын
Going to break my heart when you reach Lima Loco. They tore down the sheds in the 90s. Thankfully Allen County Museum has dutifully preserved the blue prints for the engines. They are common visit spot for Lionel and other train hoppy companies.
@robertschultz6922 Жыл бұрын
They did???
@vaclavmacgregor2464 Жыл бұрын
Do they have blueprits for 4-8-6s and 2-10-6s?
@irishtank42 Жыл бұрын
@@vaclavmacgregor2464robably, I only briefly saw the archives when I volunteered at the museum during my college days as I worked with cleaning and recording object donations. I do know that there is museum in California that also holds apart of the collection so they may also have the blueprints. What that museum name is unfortunately lost to sand of time in my memory. In the museum stand a Shay locomotive and in the town there is 779 the last steam locomotive to come out of Lima. These are last two largest physical reminders of the towns train history past open to the public.
@CrazyPetez Жыл бұрын
I know Lima built all but the first batch of GS 4-8-4 locomotives for Southern Pacific. Lima was an innovative steam locomotive builder, adding their own features to SP’s original design. While originally intended as fast power for SP’s Daylight and other streamlined trains, they were creditable freight locomotives too.
@-_Spiral_- Жыл бұрын
Baldwin gave me and the rest of Pennsylvania Reading & Northern 425, my favorite steamer. That’s enough to make me happy.
@arailway8809 Жыл бұрын
I have developed into a jake-leg railroad theorist. This is a lovely review of the Baldwin company's history. If we pull back a bit, we see that Baldwin, Alco, and EMC tended to be manufactured in the North. What happened to the railroads in the South? Corinth, Mississippi was captured in 1862. Savannah, Georgia and its rail interests were taken in 1864. The much vaunted transcontinental railroad from Iowa to California was completed in 1869. The Southern route would not be completed until 1881. Sherman bent a lot of rails on the way to Baldwin's success. The South wanted a railroad, but the Civil War got in the way.
@Alex-io5el Жыл бұрын
The fact that several dozen of their locomotives are not only in preservation but still in active service is a testament to Baldwin's build quality. They are honestly the Toyota of railroading.
@davidsellars646 Жыл бұрын
The way I recall hearing it from a locomotive salesman, Baldwin, ALCO, and Lima salesmen all got along, drank each other's whiskey and smoked their cigars. If they didn't get an order, they would get the next one. EMD was cutthroat. The railroads were told that if you want to ship automobiles, you need to do it behind EMD locomotives That is why so many steam locomotives in there prime met the torch. It wasn't that EMD locomotives were all that much better.
@devilsatan2973 Жыл бұрын
Keep in mind that EMD became a part of GM!
@Tom-Lahaye Жыл бұрын
The Baldwin story is so similar to that of the North British Locomotive works, they also were one of the largest locomotive builders, exporting many thousands of steam locomotives over the world, but they also were not successful in building diesel locomotives. One of the license holders of BLH was the Cockerill company in Belgium, they produced some of the diesel engine types from Baldwin but also Hamilton, like the 608A, and used them in locomotives for the Belgium railways but also some export models for Argentina and countries in Africa. The Belgian locomotives classes 51 and 59 powered by the 608A engine fared pretty well being withdrawn completely not earlier than 2001-2004 respectively.
@atomicpunk701 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin also made a lot of other products at Eddystone including ship propellers, hydraulic presses, and water turbines for power generation to name a few. Different company divisions all in the Eddystone plant.
@theenigmaticst7572 Жыл бұрын
A brilliant summary of the rise and fall of BLW - I like this content, Darkness; please keep it up!!!
@harrisonallen651 Жыл бұрын
The biggest railway locomotive factory for its time
@65gtotrips Жыл бұрын
I grew up in Delaware County where the Eddystone plant was located and I distinctly remember those now silent huge manufacturing sheds along Chester Pike. - If I recall correctly, the Baldwin administrative building in Eddystone Delaware County was turned into office space in the 1980’s to 1990’s time frame.
@e-train765 Жыл бұрын
Another grea documentary/video, I will continue to wait patiently for the Lima Locomotive Works video 🚂🚃🚃
@southern207hobbies Жыл бұрын
Please do h.k. porter and possibly davenport also
@J50Fan20 Жыл бұрын
Sounds nice to me
@randyedwards3244 Жыл бұрын
As a Canadian Railfan, I could not help but notice that much of your steam footage came from the National Film Board movie, "End of the Line" It chronicles the end of stram in Canada, showing the "Dead Lines" as they awaited the scrappers torch.
@jonfromstearns3 ай бұрын
My hometown short line, the Kentucky & Tennessee, was a Baldwin customer. Their most famous Baldwin locomotive was K&T12, now back in service as Southern 4501.
@kristoffermangila Жыл бұрын
"Steam would last until 1980..." Sam Vauclain clearly underestimated EMD and the financial strength of GM. You know what happened next....
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын
He wasn’t completely wrong. Steam lasted in freight service until the 1980s on two short lines/industrial railroads in Illinois, as well as past 1990 in India, Pakistan, and South Africa, and into the 2010s in Mainland China and the former Yugoslav Republics (mostly Bosnia and Kosovo) as well as on some sugar cane tramways in Indonesia.
@fanofeverything30465 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnGeorgeBauerBuisHe was referring specifically to America 🇺🇸
@vijayanchomatil8413 Жыл бұрын
Loved this video, the steam to diesel transition is an important topic of history.
@yeoldeseawitch Жыл бұрын
Baldwin is to the Ford motor company like ALCo is to General Motors
@definitelynotakgbagent6612 Жыл бұрын
Well… I would not say that cause EMD
@yeoldeseawitch Жыл бұрын
@@definitelynotakgbagent6612 no because ALCo was started by several companies merging together, sort of like GM
@ukaszwalczak1154 Жыл бұрын
Not true, Ford still exists. Baldwin got a fat L.
@yeoldeseawitch Жыл бұрын
@@ukaszwalczak1154 again, how they were founded is key. not if they exist or not.
@AmbianEagleheart Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: The former Colony of New South Wales in Australia (Australia wasn't created until 1901) once had a Royal Commission over Baldwin engines (one small part of which revolved around possible politically interference in local politics). Pretty similar to the controversy over Huawei... Edit: plz read the reply.
@AmbianEagleheart Жыл бұрын
Baldwin was exonerated. And then the New South Wales Government Railways brings out the P Class ten-wheelers and the Standard Goods (2 - 8 - 0's), whose front ends seemed awfully similar to Baldwin . I'm sure it was purely a co-incedence 😉 (The last engines the NSWGR bought off Baldwin were the D-59 class Mike's in 1952. Baldwin had closed it's tender shop by then and got Lima to make their bob-tail tenders Back in 2018 at the Goulburn Streamliner festival some yanks were standing on a rusted D-59 tender. I went straight up to 2 guys and said "Hey mate be careful on that tender, it was made by the blokes that made your GS-4's" There eyes went as big as saucer's and they both jumped down and started taking pictures, completely forgetting about the Victorian Railways B Class on the turntable. Best memory that day was the weather 38 F and snow flurries. Watching people from overseas complaining about the cold and snow still warms my heart)
@TheGs4_4449 Жыл бұрын
I really like Baldwin. I wish that they were still around. :(
@Voucher76511 ай бұрын
Same bud, They built B&O no 5300 and that Jersey Central Pacific 833
@Straswa3 ай бұрын
Great work Darkness. A shame Baldwin fell short in the diesel era.
Former Santa Fe #3415 Baldwin 4-6-2 Pacific built in 1919 is fully restored and operating on the Abilene & Smoky Valley Railroad at Abilene Kansas. I’m long retired now but as General Manager I was involved in some of the early restoration before Y2K.
@josephpadula2283 Жыл бұрын
In college we had a BLH diesel running our Emergency generator on the ex USNS Barrett (T-AP-196) that was our training ship. It was build around 1950. Parts were impossible to get. Ship ran to 1990.
@philipdove6987 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin were also a big player in Steam locomotive exports. Baldwin engines were made in standard gauge and 60cm gauge for the British and French in the first world war, as did Alco.
@RailPreserver2K Жыл бұрын
To be fair the guy wasn't technically wrong because there was one place in America still using steam in 1980, North Western Steel and Wire but that along with the Crab Orchard and Egyptian the only two Oddities running steam in the 1980s and that quickly ended after about six years
@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014 Жыл бұрын
Now do EMD’s downfall from number to its current status(even though it’s still around, just under a different owner).
@markdebruyn1212 Жыл бұрын
But EMD is still around
@jonathanng2390 Жыл бұрын
@@markdebruyn1212 true. However, EMD went from being the leader in locomotive production to a very distant second. After the poorly received SD50 in the'80s, they lost market share to GE. GE now has 70% of the market for north American locomotive production.
@markdebruyn1212 Жыл бұрын
@@jonathanng2390 I also thinks he is gonna only do companies that are no more
@tracylemme1375 Жыл бұрын
EMD is sill here, but it is no longer part of GM. It is a part of Progressive Rail, which is owned by Caterpillar.
@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014 Жыл бұрын
@@markdebruyn1212 Obviously I knew that the moment I posted it, but just because I didn’t add any further description doesn’t mean it was necessary nor that I don’t know it.
@dennisyoung4631 Жыл бұрын
Awesome Foundry Action at… 3:30 and after
@WAL_DC-6B5 ай бұрын
Indeed, but also notice the lack of personal safety gear such as eye goggles, hard hats and gloves.
@ypaulbrown Жыл бұрын
you have incorporated some great production video.....well done video in this old timers opinion, cheers, Paul in Florida
@bentimberprod3 ай бұрын
The reason i got into baldwin, was because of the USRA mikados that they helped make. Theres just something about the mikados, not to big, but not smaller than the baldwin 2-8-0s and 2-6-0s etc… luv you channel by da way❤
@danielmkubacki Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I learned so much from this video about The Baldwin Locomotive Works. Nice Video Sir.
@derekthelehighvalleyfoamer4427 Жыл бұрын
So Baldwin was the American equivalent of general British steam manufacturers of the 50’s and 60’s, when it came to diesels.
@nicholaskelly1958 Жыл бұрын
Probably the oddest locomotive Baldwin built was a curious 0-2-0ST steam monorail locomotive for the Bradford & Foster Brook Railway in Pennsylvania. They also built the first successful compressed air locomotives in America. The first such locomotive being a streetcar engine in 1874. The first industrial compressed air locomotive was built in 1877. Named 'UNIQUE'' it was built for the Plymouth Cordage Co of Plymouth, Massachusetts. Today it preserved along with another Baldwin compressed air locomotive also ex Plymouth Cordage in The Plymouth Cordage Museum. Between 1874 and 1923 Baldwin built eighty compressed air locomotives mainly for mining. However it was decided to concentrate on electric/battery electric locomotives for the mining industry using Westinghouse equipment. Probably the most extraordinary locomotives they ever built were the three gigantic steam turbine-electric locomotives for the C&0 RR These huge locomotives no's 500,501 & 502 proved unsuccessful. However a fourth steam turbine-electric locomotive was built for the Norfolk & Western no 2300 known as "Jawn Henry" whilst it was more successful than the C&O locomotives it was over complicated and was withdrawn in 1958. When it comes to Gasoline/Petrol and Diesel locomotives it should not be forgotten that Baldwin built vast numbers of such machines mainly under the Whitcombe brand. Personally my favourite American Diesel locomotive is without doubt the Baldwin RF-16/RF-615E "Sharknose"!
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын
The C&O units had a throttle with at least 11 notches, and were one of the early uses of the phrase ‘up to eleven’.
@nicholaskelly1958 Жыл бұрын
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Thank you for that. Whilst there is a very good book on "Jawn Henry" I have never seen a book devoted to the three C&O locomotives. Whilst I do have a book on the rolling stock that was designed for the 'Chessie' service (Washington DC to Cincinnati) I have never seen anything on the locomotives themselves. Apart from the strange La France rotary engines that General Roy Stone used in his monorail vehicles (The railcar demonstrated at the 1876 Centennial Exhibition and locomotive no 1 on the Bradford & Foster Brook Railway) There were only seven steam turbine locomotives built in the USA Six of which were Turbo-Electric machines. 1&2) The pair of General Electric locomotives that were used for a time on the Union Pacific after 1938 and later on the Great Northern before being returned to GE c.1943 and later dismantled. I did hear that one of the boilers rated to 100bar may still exist (They were the highest pressure boilers ever used on a steam locomotive. The only steam locomotives that operated at higher pressures were the fireless locomotives built to the designs of Dr Paul Roman Gilli in Austria and Germany. In some cases, the reservoir pressure was as high as 120bar with a solitary loco capable of being charged to 130bar. However, in these cases, the steam was drawn off a stationary source of high pressure steam and reduced to 17 bar or less prior to its use) In the case of 20th century European high pressure compressed air mining locomotives, the primary charge could be as high as 200 to 235bar! Again the air would be reduced to 40bar or less before it was used) 3,4&5) The three C&O locomotives nos 500,501& 502. 6) The N&W "Jawn Henry" The only other steam turbine locomotive was Pennsylvania Rail Road no 6200 The 6-8-6 direct drive (via gears) This locomotive was based on the LMSR Pacific no 202 designed by Sir William Stanier. Later being renumbered by British Railways as no 6202. Due to problems with her turbines She was rebuilt in 1951 into a conventional steam locomotive. Named 'Princess Anne'. In her rebuilt form she had a tragically short life. As on 8th October 1952 whilst being run in and was working a morning London to Liverpool service with 'The Windward Isles' Having reached the London suburbs and by now travelling at high speed the train ploughed into the wreckage caused by 'City of Glasgow' running at least two red signals and hitting a stationary commuter train in Harrow & Wealdstone Station By far the worst railway accident in England with 112 people killed.
@ljones1212 ай бұрын
There's actually a Whitcomb built locomotive preserved in North East, Pennsylvania at the Lakeshore Railway Museum.
@josephpadula2283 Жыл бұрын
For the record both Alco and Fairbanks Morse diesel engines are still in service in the US on tugs and ships and parts are easy to get. You can even buy a whole engine 251 Alco or 38 Fairbanks if you need to as they are still listed. My last ship now scrapped had Alco 251diesels, but Australia still runs sister ships coast guard cutters have alcos too still.
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын
That is part of how Fairbanks-Morse are still in business, up in Wisconsin!
@bwan13 Жыл бұрын
13:59-14:07 Regarding the original CN 9000 & 9001. One of them actually had a fairly long life. Both were equipped with a Beardmore diesel engine. 9001 was retired in 1939 and scrapped in 1946. 9000, on the other hand, was reactivated in 1942 and re-engined with a 16 cylinder 567A and equipped with armored plate for an armored train that was to operate along the BC coast. Following the end of the armored Train operation in 1943, it was transferred to Montreal. By 1945, the armor plating was removed, and it was used in passenger service until 1946, when it was retired again and scrapped. Both numbers got reused for EMD F3s in 1948.
@kenthansen3278 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin supplied the US Army with knock-down locomotives in the first WW, that when unloaded in French ports, any part could be used to assemble a locomotive. As far as I am aware, the first example or truly "Mass-Manufactured", interchangeable components of a complex mechanism.
@andrewallen9993 Жыл бұрын
Nope! Cadillac won the Dewar trophy much earlier back when the vehicle truly was the "standard of the world".
@HoosierDaddy_ Жыл бұрын
They all had their day. It seems like EMD is the only one that didn't screw up the diesel age.
@kristoffermangila Жыл бұрын
Its because EMD defined the diesel age!
@drosera88 Жыл бұрын
Alco: Diesel is the future EMD: Diesel is the future Baldwin: LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU LALALALA
@dennisyoung4631 Жыл бұрын
“Not enough soot,” said Baldwin. “Hold my Distillate,” said Alco.
@jar407 Жыл бұрын
i am from philly and drove as delivery down town i cannot believe that the baldwin was smack in the center of town across from the city hall. the city wanted a new city hall but it was built with enormous blocks i thing garnet so they found it would cost more to just tear down the city hall so it was cheaper to build auxiliary building on the Baldwin plot since they moved out
@charlielaudico3523 Жыл бұрын
In the 1980s i did work piecework in a company in Western New York ! You woked at your own pace depending on how much you wanted to make!
@mrsrmp Жыл бұрын
Thank you Darkness! A great vídeo about my favorite locomotive builder
@JDsHouseofHobbies Жыл бұрын
One advantage that EMD had over the other locomotive companies is the access to GM's Styling and Marketing departments. I believe some of the first paint schemes GM put on it's new diesels were done by some of the same people designing GMs cars.
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын
Yes, the Santa Fe and Rock Island ‘Warbonnet’ liveries were both designed by GM. Interestingly enough, the classic ‘grey and brown’ Canadian Pacific livery was directly from the Baldwin catalog, which is why the Copper Range in Michigan also used it even though they had no corporate ties to Canadian Pacific!
@jasongoodman3495 Жыл бұрын
My grandparents grew up 15 minutes from where the Eddystone Shop was
@vaclavmacgregor2464 Жыл бұрын
The giant that stumbled..................................... (Read it for info)
@giovanni5063 Жыл бұрын
Never knew about Baldwin until now. The drive wheels on my 1948 Lionel 726 locomotive have the tiniest letters that say "Baldwin discs". I needed 2 magnifying glasses to see that.
@timvala757711 ай бұрын
I think the reason is they made the s-2 turbine then and used the same 8 wheel chassis.The s-2 turbine was a very expensive locomotive to operate Baldwin produced. It was very inefficient using horrendous amounts of water and coal. Only a few were made and didn’t last long. It was said the Lionel corporation produced more of them than the actual company and had a longer life in sales from Lionel! They actually were a great pulling engine in 0 and 027 then.
@pkat Жыл бұрын
- Whitesmith = tinsmith - Piecework isn't necessarily bad, most small Mom & Pop manufacturers operate on piecework. Japan and China are eating our lunch through piecework - I'll agree that Baldwin made some dumb moves with their diesels, but they all did, especially when it came to MU operations. The idea that locomotives could be operated as multiple units was weird and alien to the steam builders because steam locomotives don't work like that and EMC's FT locomotive was built around the concept of MU operations. - Ok, we have MU capability, but why should my ALCO or BLW locomotive MU with an EMD? They didn't want the railroads to buy EMD locomotives so many were intentionally incompatible with other manufacturers, when the realization that this was a bad idea dawned it was way too late. - I think BLW and ALCO were hoping brand loyalty would carry over to diesel sales and were shocked when that dried up very quickly - I also think that EMD and GE snagged up all the engineers that could design a diesel locomotive leaving the steam builders utterly clueless when it came to designing a road switcher.
@JBB4118 Жыл бұрын
Once again nice video but i have to ask....what is that footage at the start? The front end ride down some tracks. I would like to know the story and where this was {and if it's still around}
@rosemarycornwell1528 Жыл бұрын
Looks like at least 75% of the diesel locomotives you show are EMD or Alco. During World War 2 Baldwin and Alco were limited to producing steam locomotives and/or diesel switchers by the War Production Board, whereas EMC/EMD could only produce FT road freight diesels.
@cademan29 Жыл бұрын
I would love to see your take on the Alaska Railroad and all the Railroads that made it.
@brucehain Жыл бұрын
Is that assembly of inside cylinders at 6:50 ? If so that would be a four-cylinder locomotive, right? Pretty amazing.
@franciscodanconia45 Жыл бұрын
Piece rate pay always works when it’s well managed, and never when it’s poorly managed. The two biggest arguments against it are 1. Poorly articulated complaints about management, and 2. Exploitation of workers by unions/racketeers.
@jimfarmer7811 Жыл бұрын
John deere still uses a piece rate system today.
@dannyminxe5807 Жыл бұрын
ALCO got the short end of the stick, Baldwin took the stick and beat themself over the head with it.
@Rocker-1234 Жыл бұрын
not really, if you think about it baldwin were more ahead of thier time. sure they hated diesels but thier electrics were ahead of thier time. so in a way they werent wrong, alot of countries are looking back on diesels like "why did we do that?" now that they have electric to do everything diesels did. its just america that is seemingly hell bent on restricting the advancement of electrics. and australia is proof you can electrify without fucking up the freight routes. some of our largest freight trains with double stacks and double height box cars run through electrified sections/cities without issue. sure they were wrong about companies continuing steam but they werent entirely wrong about diesels being left in the dust or people in general wishing for steam to come back.. seems they were just stuck in the wrong market
@markdebruyn1212 Жыл бұрын
The dutch 1200 series are also designed by Baldwin but built by by Werkspoor (Wich also does not exists anymore)
@VSigma725 Жыл бұрын
I hope someday the last two Baldwin RF-16 "Sharknose" locomotives will move under their own power again. It seems that, aside from an appearance two years ago, they've been kept hidden for forty years?
@michigandon Жыл бұрын
Larkin isn't getting any younger! I do hope something positive happens to/with them in the future.
@Rocker-1234 Жыл бұрын
baldwin wasnt all that wrong.... the day did come that we looked back on steam and realised how great it was.... but it was just decades after he thought it would happen, and it was the public not the companies who realised it.
@robertgift Жыл бұрын
Interesting! Well done! Thank you.
@Voucher765Ай бұрын
Baldwin gave birth to engines such as Iconic excursion star Reading 2102 and Western Maryland 1309 the last steam engine built by Baldwin right after WWII in 1949
@cudwieser3952 Жыл бұрын
You should do more deep dive, compendium vids for trains and foundaries in the US
@jordandorsett3106 Жыл бұрын
I LOVE BALDWIN LOCOMOTIVE WORKS LOCOS!!!
@Oatmealism Жыл бұрын
I'd like to say that if the US Government didn't push for dieselification and raised the costs for running steam while reducing costs for diesel to artificially make diesel a more attractive option, Steam would have stuck around a lot longer because it was tried, true, and there were some major innovations in steam tech that would have made them better well into the future, there are many diesel locomotives today that cost more than it did to run steam back then (accounting for inflation as well), and don't even offer as much performance or power as steam could. there are only a handful of diesel electrics today that can compare to steam in their hayday.
@bmomjian Жыл бұрын
The "plus" headquarters at 13:12 is still standing in Eddystone, PA.
@bpw1028967 ай бұрын
Kinda interesting watching this when we're seeing this in the automotive industry now, people either refusing to change or panic building things that people either don't want or that just don't work right
@karenhensley8745 Жыл бұрын
I love the video but you should know that George Westinghouse started the company by inventing air brakes for trains
@65gtotrips Жыл бұрын
I wonder if anyone here who knows someone who worked at Baldwin knew my Grandfather ? My grandfather worked at Baldwin I’d say in the 1930’s to 1950’s era. His name was Edward Larkins. I just know he worked for the company as I was too young to converse with him about his employment.
@jthepickle7 Жыл бұрын
To see 1900s technology with an 1800s storyline is interesting, in that the factories, probably looked very similar - which is astounding, in that the Bessemer Process had yet to be invented! One has to ask, WHERE DID ALL THAT STEEL COME FROM? - before the Bessemer Process (1856)
@lisapelletier242 Жыл бұрын
great, can you make one about fairbanks morse?
@connarcomstock161 Жыл бұрын
The M4 you showed was actually a Canadian tank built, ironically, by Chrysler.
@tracylemme1375 Жыл бұрын
Although steam locomotives have a certain magical quality, Diesel is much more efficient in fuel usage, and require much less maintenance. It is no wonder why Diesel won out over steam. EMD has a prime mover that is powerful ,easy to maintain,and fuel efficient. Multiple units could be used together, and a steam engineer’s license was not required. I am very glad that the OLD steam units are being preserved, but I am afraid that their usefulness has come to an end.
@joshuabessire9169 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin disappeared after their car broke down near a mailbox in the middle of nowhere labeled "Alfred E."
@65gtotrips Жыл бұрын
I don’t know anything about his time there, but my Grandfather worked at Baldwin I’d say in the 1920’s to 1950’s ?
@cudwieser3952 Жыл бұрын
Lima is a very prolific company as is Skoda.
@ljones1212 ай бұрын
There is some irony in mentioning Westinghouse, because the Westinghouse descendant is building locomotives again because yes that's right Wabtec. So Westinghouse has now technically made locomotives twice.
@FDNY101202 Жыл бұрын
3:31 amazes me how much our society complains today while we live off the backs of men, giants like this. 😑
@tkraft63 Жыл бұрын
In the 1950s my father took me to the Baldwin works to see the huge atomic cannon they were building for the U.S. Government.
@evanpenny348 Жыл бұрын
You need to acknowledge that most if not all the manufacturing sequences are sourced from documentaries from the LMS railways of Britain.
@keithammleter3824 Жыл бұрын
It is interesting that Baldwin management thought diesel electric locos would not succeed because of unreliability. The Australian railroad WAGR when it decided to dieselize, decided to buy from the lowest price tenderer - a dodgy British heavy engineering company that had never made a diesel loco before. The said dodgy company chose a submarine diesel engine that did not produce enough power, so they hotted it up by running it at 140 RPM instead of the designed 90 RPM. The result, the X-class, was vibration so bad it ruined bearings and fittings, and had catastrophic faults like broken pistons. Black smoke that glugged up the exhaust system. Its unreliability was so bad the government held a major enquiry as passengers were arriving late for work too often. Never the less, the WAGR found that, despite the very high fault rate, the X-Class was very much cheaper to run than a steam loco, due to:- a) about three times better fuel efficiency - the cost of diesel fuel was way below the cost of coal; b) a steam loco needs about 2 to 4 man-days per day maintenance labour. A diesel needs next to nothing in daily maintenance. c) A crew needs to light up and get steaming a steam loco 3 to 4 hours before it can move. A diesel engine needs only a 10 minute warmup after a cold start. Money counting always wins, so the WAGR just kept buying more X-Class so they could scrap steam. Eventually, over about 10 years, they figured out how to make the X-Class fairly reliable. Something like a dozen or more piston designs were tried until they got one that survived the stresses. Only if you own a coal mine does it make sense to use steam. Most likely not even then. (other than nostalgic excursion trains).
@courtneyhirsh227111 ай бұрын
Myy great great grandfather was Matthew Baird of BLW
@2dogsmowing3 ай бұрын
There's a lot of trades companies around my area that pay piece work.
@the_crystalg71112 ай бұрын
With the RF-16s, it wasn't that they themselves couldn't be used in multiple unit lash-ups, they couldn't be used in multiple unit with other builder's locomotives, so they could be used together, but couldn't be used with EMD or Alco Units. But, they were by comparison, usually stronger pulling locomotives than the other builder's, at least at the beginning, but EMD eventually built stronger engines, and Baldwin continued to build RF-16s in very few numbers
@TheTransporter007 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin still makes pianos! 🎹 (Kidding, I know they are separate, unrelated companies)
@justjestin9749 Жыл бұрын
I wonder if there was any relation other than just the name from Baldwin's partner David Mason to William Mason. William founded the Mason Machine Works in Massachusetts and produced textiles and locomotives also. Most famously the "self-acting mule" and the Mason Bogie Locomotives.
@peteengard9966 Жыл бұрын
The war production board played the biggest part of their downfall. Their diesel switchers were excellent products. The use of air throttles limited the MU capability with other makers. The prohibition of research and technology by the WPB allowed EMC and ALCO to patent a lot of control equipment. Plus the short sightedness of management to try to build a single diesel unit as powerful as a steam locomotive instead of paying patents for MU control. Add to that the failure to partner with a reliable diesel engine manufacturer. With all this , you have failure.
@adamtain7627 Жыл бұрын
Baldwin even built engines 3, 4 and 5 of the Disneyland railroad and all of the engines on the Disney world railroad, even the steam locomotives owned by Disney animator Ward Kimball
@josephpadula2283 Жыл бұрын
Where I work we at a dam we still have 16 Baldwin Lima Hamilton hydro Kaplan style turbines running everyday. They are well over 50 years old. Each is 212,000 HP. Not a typo. I can find No history about this era when they made turbines in York PA. Large parts were made in Japan. The factory still exists owned by Voith I think.
@calvingreene90 Жыл бұрын
It just can't be that hard to add a diesel genset to an electric locamotive.
@TomJosephi Жыл бұрын
Samuel Vauclain's daughter married Franklin Abbott,a Pittsburgh architect.
@OldsVistaCruiser Жыл бұрын
You mentioned the drop in business between 1906 and 1908 at 11:06. You didn't mention the Panic of 1907.
@gchristian76129 ай бұрын
Enjoy the railroad history. How did you come up with "Darkness the Curse"?
@gordieboi2340 Жыл бұрын
14:50 If only... If only...
@michigandon Жыл бұрын
I wish I lived in that alternate universe! Then again, perhaps I should count my blessings that I don't?
@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын
Chicago Great Western 114-A at 17:08!
@campkohler9131 Жыл бұрын
What’s the difference between expected and actually expected?