The Fat Electrician Reviews: Tankers & M1 Abrams Tank Reaction

[@dulmater]

Paper is one thing, let's see how it does in combat!

[@Mikudude1billion]

I'm pretty sure, given context clues from previous vids alone, that "1812" is just the technical code for the job. Like how you have a name, but your social security code or whatever, a bunch of numbers, is also you.

[@Raggmopp-xl7yf]

My brother was a tanker - he's HUGE! He'd graduated HS at 5'7" and went into the army. A couple of years later I picked him up from the airport and when I saw him I barely recognized him! He was 6'2" and RIPPED! Like his bicep was bigger than my thigh ripped. I swear the 1st thing out of my mouth was, "My God! What have they been feeding you?!!" During his visit is when I learned of the term, "Crunchy." I was disturbed! But most military euphemisms are rather dark.

[@anzaca1]

Just gonna point out that until Ukraine, no Challenger 2 was ever lost in combat. One was subjected to multiple RPG hits, but kept going.

[@kyciswrenn6736]

have you done the fat electrician - SWCC video yet that's a good one.

[@dulmater]

Nope! I'll add it to the list!

[@BigGator5]

American Tanks are leaps and bounds better than anyone else's tanks, it's not funny. Now while I understand that those specific tanks are obsolete, I've always been a fan of the old British War World I style of "Wedge" tanks (as I like to call them). I'm talking about no turret and swappable weapon placements. I'm not saying that we SHOULD do that, but it would be fun to design a modern version of that tank. Such a tank, however, would only be a light personal or convoy escort. I also wouldn't mind seeing if the Scorpion Tank from the Halo franchise is possible.

[@brandonmercer499]

Scorpion tank: maybe if the U.S. military ever decides to hire Hacksmith Industry