The Final, Deepest, Ultimate Reality

Рет қаралды 68,000

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 189

@dynamike201 Жыл бұрын

The capacity of this man to concisely communicate such unfathomable abstract concepts in a non-confusing way for laymen is exceptional. A true mark of a great mind. And a beacon of great relief for generalists like me who are increasingly thrown of course by overwhelming hypes and chatter going around in the public arena. Thank you much both.

@jimmyjasi- Жыл бұрын

"How is that possible that dimished brain activity correlates with rich psychic experiences"? Stuart Hameroff has far better explanation for this that doesn't require faith but is experimentally backed. I hate Idealism and denying that brain produces consciousness because it leads to pointless ping pong spirituality vs "Materialism (wherever this XIX century noun is supposed to mean in Quantum Age) But the point is people who deny that brain produces consciousness are playing to Elon Musk goal post but ignoring threats of brain organoids development and it's ethical implications that are totally ignored. You may not believe that they are conscious (although I do) but ...very well let's even suppose for a second that Idealism is right (although I reject it together with Dualism and Solipsism) even in that case you cannot deny that possibility of brain transplant technology already performed routinely in mice is rather nasty! And Elon Musk (also "religious") person keeps smiling malevolently. I don't care what you believe about conscious or reality but please don't close eyes to this social threat!

@briobarb8525 Жыл бұрын

I couldn't agree with you more, Dyna. I just discovered this program channel today, and this guest. Wow...loving it. And I really appreciate this gentleman explaining it as he does.

@clivejenkins4033 Жыл бұрын

Materialism is history, bernardos analytic idealism is so fascinating

@nisha6677 6 ай бұрын

❤

@aletanna 6 ай бұрын

I am so incredibly enthralled and thankful to this man; for his sheer brilliance to communicate such esoteric, mentally challenging and psychologically devastating constructs. Thank you my friend, for continuing to fight the good fight.

@scottnorvell2955 6 ай бұрын

Well said! And I agree completely.

@mahendrashukla1895 Жыл бұрын

What a profundity in explaining abstruse and abstract matters. We are indeed so thankful to Dr.Bernardo Kastrup.

@kkandthegirls6363 Жыл бұрын

Great explanation of why AI can't be conscious. Seems intuitive to me, but I couldn't explain it, until now. Bernardo is not only brilliant, he can communicate his thoughts well. I wish everyone would listen to this.

@weissmann7770 Жыл бұрын

The best Aish series out there. You are blazing new, needed trails. Way to go

@michel-jeantailleur Жыл бұрын

An excellent introduction to many aspects of Bernardo's thought.

@Jagombe1 Жыл бұрын

"...quantum field is not a thing....things are what come from its excitation...." tallies with, "objects are manifestations of consciousness". Perfect! Bernardo has a way of explaining the abstract.

@hook-x6f Жыл бұрын

Sounds like magic to me. Anything can be known because everything is connected. There is an infinite superposition of probability that manifests only when you're paying attention. I grew up poor and I couldn't afford to pay attention.

@garybarr1045 11 ай бұрын

I have just discovered you and your basic metaphysical concepts of thinking and being. I think you are on the right track. I look forward to your work and hope I can progress upward and onward in a similar manner. I feel freedom and openness with my own mind as I entertain where you are going. I am of a religion that agrees with what you are proposing. I feel uplifted that you are breaking away from the scientific status quo with evidence and substance to support your position. Bravo!

@patrickl6932 Жыл бұрын

Thanks for having Bernardo on..

@JimKanaris Жыл бұрын

Thanks for this! Really found this segment in particular insightful: 34:57 to 38:15.

@inglestaemtudo Жыл бұрын

Wonderful conversation! Thank you for sharing this with us 🙏

@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын

Do you know what Bernardo’s strongest argument against solipsism is? Or which video I should watch?

@KipIngram Жыл бұрын

33:28 - Yes; this is exactly how I think the fine tuning problem goes away. Once you start out with the idea that "minds exist as the fundamental entities," then those minds are *givens* and don't have to be explained. And of course if we construct a physical picture of a universe we are in, if we do that job consistently and well then it better be described in a way that allows for our existence - because we are here. There was no other way it could have gone. Put it this way: if our description wound up implying we couldn't be here, then we got it wrong. Since we're here.

@Dhorpatan Жыл бұрын

Humans have minds. Minds are the fundamental entities. How freaking convenient.

@AintImRite Жыл бұрын

Wherever you go, there you are. - Jim Russell

@theostapel Жыл бұрын

As a man thinketh - so he be. Yet there are always beings - teachers - to help change and let us be free. Freedom is being free - from freedom - itself. (Ram Chandra)

@hook-x6f Жыл бұрын

It' s as if there is an element of consciousness in all matter and when nature is doing it's job the matter in the universe evolves into more and more complex forms and the more sophisticated the equipment the more awareness you can have.

@theostapel Жыл бұрын

Full (almost verdant) vision and interesting -in its complexity - a bit overwhelming for moi - Simplicity is (for me) - more understandable and livable. Its all this force of existence and me - on the meditation mat - plummeting joyfully - into the heart - for meaning. May your work be real. Fare thee well.@@hook-x6f

@opensourceradionics 11 ай бұрын

33:06 best part where the breathing of the interviewer demonstrates how Bernardo hit hard the edge of his paradigm, generating a lot of pain and fear. I repeated that part over and over again, eating some popcorn, enjoying it a lot 😄... joking aside, this remembers me a lot of what Robert Lanza wrote in his book "Biocentrism".

@cliffrosen3605 Жыл бұрын

Wonderful episode - such fascinating and stimulating discussion about the nature of reality and consciousness!

@jimmyjasi- Жыл бұрын

@@gajendrasinghpoonia1481 Thanks. I don't care about Nature of reality as much as about ethics and our cultural morality blind spots. Religious people consider using Germ Line Crispr to protect two pretty babies from deadly HIV by He Jiankui "sinfull" yet have no problem with mentioned issue despite overwhelming evidence that consciousness cannot be totally divorced from brain no matter what your philosophy is. Even if was I wrong about brain organoids being conscious, the fact that our Best XXI Century science still doesn't have complete proven theory for what consciousness is or is not and yet stem cell researchers totally ignore these issues unopposed by philophers and ethicists who are when it comes to genetics preocupied only with one issue of supposed racial IQ differences discrimition and ignoring everything else. I just find it outrageus! He Jiankui was named a "Nazi" for providing happy and healthy lives for babies from HIV affected families, and meaning to their parents yet far more controversial fields of biotechnology get totally ignored by society! By the way everyone with most basic knowlegde of genetics will tell You that traits like IQ, autism, or even simingly simple things like Athletic performance or skin colour are highly Polygenic and well beyond scope of any kind of CRISPR including Germ Line which is safer one compared to somatic Thanks.

@vulturom Жыл бұрын

This is an amazing mind opening talk

@LeonExplores23 Жыл бұрын

Wow! What an amazing interview.

@yahwada 10 ай бұрын

Each interview with Dr. Kastrup deepens or changes my perspective on many subjects. I think it was very unfair of the interviewer to drop the God question with so little time for a proper answer. The interview was informative as was the prejudice represented by that last question.

@richardgoodson6515 11 ай бұрын

Lets say there are two states of consciousness. Consciousness of self and consciousness outside of self. Sense consciousness of self is made of memory, then why when a computer has enough memory can it not form a self.

@adamd585 Жыл бұрын

Bernardo is always super clear and articulate with his explanations. Starting at 32:14 and lasting a couple minutes, Bernardo brings up a very interesting point about the world being "fine-tuned". Would like to see Bernardo speak to more people of faith that have a good grasp at science and philosophy. Would be interesting to see where the discussions could go. It really helps the viewer understand better when the interviewer is actively trying to understand it (follow up questions, clarifications, etc). The questions asked to Bernardo were great! Great video and thank you 🙌

@jason-iy7vs Жыл бұрын

Check his convos w Jonathan pageau & John vervaeke

@adamd585 Жыл бұрын

@@jason-iy7vs I've listened to most of Bernardo's interviews. I liked the John Vervaeke ones, but for some reason I couldn't get through the Jonathan Pageau ones... Don't want to sound like an asshole, but the couple times I listened to Jonathan Pageau, I felt it was too wishy-washy with lots of talking and not much substance (or maybe i'm dumb). This was a while ago, so maybe I should try again. Edward Feser caught my attention a while ago, and I've been meaning to look more into him. Would be interesting to watch Edward and Bernardo have a discussion.

@jason-iy7vs Жыл бұрын

@@adamd585 Totally get it.. When I first started checking out Pageau's stuff I was a bit unsure of what to make of it.. As I spent more time with it, I realized that while he may not the best at articulating, the insights he points to are pretty interesting. Not to mention the fact I like to somewhat consider him to be a representative of a more traditional worldview, so its almost like having a conversation with a person from the past.. So I chalk up the wishy washy feeling(which I also had) to just being a consequence of his different way of seeing, & different use of words.

@adamd585 Жыл бұрын

@@jason-iy7vs You are probably right about how Pageau may just have a different way of seeing things, which then he ends up using unfamiliar ways of describing things. Next time I see an interesting Pageau video, I'll give it a go with that in mind!

@sgypson Жыл бұрын

Can anyone provide a link to the work by Austrian philosopher referenced at 32:18?

@vlangvling1403 Жыл бұрын

What does it add to use the word "God" if it's not the supposition that there's a conscious entity controlling everything ? But I think the best way to solve the problem of what's fundamental is to say that it's what is neither material nor mental, but at the source of both : undefinable (at the source of definable). Otherwise we fall into kind of logical loops...

@SurrealMcCoy 11 ай бұрын

"Form is emptiness, emptiness is form"

@innerlight617 Жыл бұрын

Thanks for uploading!!

@kyriacostheofanous1445 7 ай бұрын

For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.

@rachimbaskin6559 4 ай бұрын

You're a poet.

@CrazyLinguiniLegs 4 ай бұрын

You know what? “The Theologians” isn’t a bad name for a band. “Mountains of Ignorance” is pretty good, too.

@richard3803 5 ай бұрын

There is a lovely Sufi quote that goes something like this... God (syn. Consciousness) Sleeps in rocks, Stirs in plants, Dreams in animals, and Awakens in humans. In other words Consciousness is the fundamental principle of the universe. An intelligent universe consciousness of itself. A singular universal energy expressing as this present and eternal moment.

@eldoradose Жыл бұрын

The reality is mental. But what does mental mean exactly? Well, mind, consciousness, inteligence etc. bascilally tautology. But what is consciousness, what is a mind? Well...we do not know for sure, so we do not now what the reality is...Well this is indeed the breakthrough in science :)

@pascalguerandel8181 Жыл бұрын

Federico Faggin 😊😊😊...wow!

@krzemyslav Жыл бұрын

Nietzsche's sister's judgement about idealism has to be put in the context. 19th century was a heyday of German idealism. And it ended up in unproductive speculation while physicalism was moving natural sciences forward. Hence perceived escape from reality. That's at least a notion I got from Harald Walach's book "Psychologie".

@MsCjansen Жыл бұрын

Bernardo, do you know of the work of David Hawkins, Power vs Force, it is aligned with what you believe but it comes from a different source ,. If you don't already know about, you would find interesting...Thank you for your work, I have found it so uplifting even though I personally have come to the same understandings after40years of meditating.

@lynnvener6631 6 ай бұрын

This is ALL TRUE.......GOD, the CREATOR of ALL, is REAL & GOD is EVERYWHERE & EVERYTHING... Even in EACH of US..GOD is not a PERSON or what we've been taught..Our UNIVERSE is NOT like what we've been told & we ARE NOT ALONE in it, either..Their are "universal LAWS" that CANT be broken by ANYONE.. WE are so much more POWERFUL & AMAZING then we KNOW! Many POSITIVE things are happening behind the curtain & this SHOW is almost OVER..ALL is NOT what it SEEMS. The REAL TRUTH will come out SOON & it WILL SET us All FREE!!! You'll see..😇

@dwai963 Жыл бұрын

I know Bernardo really don't want to be the "wise old man" archetype, but damn, he is a teacher....

@treich1234 Жыл бұрын

38:54The quantum field is pure energy and we don't even understand what energy is for that matter

@Snowrosered 2 ай бұрын

I know it's dry but it's fascinating to me.

@SimoneMancini1 Жыл бұрын

What a wonderful interview ! Thanks for sharing ❤

@nathalie7177 Жыл бұрын

brillant !! thank you for share !!

@samrowbotham8914 Жыл бұрын

Bernardo has come a long way on the podcast circuit since I set him up with his first interview with Evita Ochell about ten years ago. The following video corroborates what idealists have been saying for centuries that the Mind is at the base of everything it gets rid of infinite regress in simulation theory. It is further supported by the literature of Thanatology and Occult theology. Consciousness is not an epiphenomenon of the brain. It's when something happens like a shock or trauma that people have an epiphany that changes them. This is a Good follow-up video because it corroborates what idealists like Kastrup say, the Mind is responsible for this reality and it gets rid of infinite regress which is a problem for simulation theorists: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGO7pKNqe7eal9U

@gregoryallen0001 Жыл бұрын

21:00 seems like it's both random and selective pressure but what do i know

@susanj5591 Жыл бұрын

Thank you I totally agree

@richardgoodson6515 11 ай бұрын

Not diminished brain activity, but thoughts may need to temporarily be quiet for other consciousness possibilities to appear.

@21EC Жыл бұрын

23:45 - There might be such methodology through using a deep neural network AI simulation (perhaps in the future that would be possible on a large scale to mimic real reality conditions that are not being considered in lab conditions)

@PaulaDTozer 11 ай бұрын

It’s interesting…as I see it, the human signature in the design of AI cannot be overstated. The inherent arrogance of the architects is built in, along with as much humility as is possible, given the level of consciousness of the builders. That it’s primarily young men who draw the components of consciousness that resonate with them from the field of consciousness is problematic, IMHO, but it is what it is. The “high” that comes from experimentation is worthy of its pursuit…it’s what makes life worth living…however, chasing this high by the creation and observation of what we’ve created simply for creation’s sake…like climbing Everest simply because it’s there…may be leading humankind down a rabbit hole from which there is no escape. I think it’s already happening. The words with which we discuss reality hold as much currency as does public opinion, in my perception, so I choose to proceed with caution. By pursuing artificial intelligence for the sake of observing the results - we run the risk of creating our own monsters, monsters that humankind has envisioned and drawn into reality from the depths of the scientific mind. I’m not against the scientific perspective…far from it, but consider that it’s not middle-aged farmers creating AI. Understandably, we wish to progress - scientific breakthroughs are created by scientists, not farmers, I get it. This doesn’t change my point…who is more risk embracing - the young scientist or the middle-aged farmer? As much as I love a deep philosophical discussion, the reality is that it’s not the philosophers who are taking the actual steps to “make” AI become part of our reality…the reality is that we are commentators while Rome is burning. Perhaps I’m wrong. Time will tell.

@Meditation409 Жыл бұрын

Wow another great discussion 👏 👍 Very significant. 💖

@AintImRite Жыл бұрын

Our perception of the world around us is limited by the limited tools of our knowledge and senses.

@susanj5591 Жыл бұрын

Tell me in what ways this overlaps with your Kabbalahlistic training and study. iI does the same for me... ❤" The world that is constantly coming" such an exciting cross over for me.

@jamesrossiter6319 10 ай бұрын

If quantum fields ripple, and the exciting of fields creates the ripple effects that makes the patterns of fundamental particles…. Where is the energy that causes the “ripples” in the field? What is causing the field to excite and move and create patterns?

@gireeshneroth7127 4 ай бұрын

It's a mental world of the mind alone. Mind is all there is after consciousness. The mind worldbeing itself.

@zardoz7900 9 ай бұрын

I had a flash of insight that consciousness is not "mine" parse, in other words, it's something that just happens, similarly to this body not being "mine". The "I" in other words the notion of the individual only has practical implications under a larger context of society being another abstract notion, a term useful exclusively in its functional utility. Wittgenstein comes to mind. The "self" is an arbitrary notion. Where do I end and the world begins? My tooth, the surface of my skin? My car? My wife? .... And so forth.

@pacman-x3m 11 ай бұрын

So instead of talking about quantum fields and ripples and gravitational waves, could we start talking again about aether?

@susanj5591 Жыл бұрын

Please listen to and talk with Amit Goswami. talk about EVOLution and it's Purpose is moving in an understandable and desirable direction. This very very much aligns with what you're saying from hiis perspective of consciousness steeped in Indian philosophy.

@19battlehill Жыл бұрын

"In the Beginning was the word. And the word was with God. And the word was a God" --- Gospel of John

@anthonyjohnson1294 Жыл бұрын

Speaking of "RANDOMNESS" your comments and questions are very random. Listeners would appreciate you finding a focus and STAY THERE! Thank you

@bryantcofty2709 11 ай бұрын

No, not mind, consciousness, there's a HUGE DIFFERENCE.

@Amrdm4cn 9 ай бұрын

Fields with ripples interacting in a flow. I watched another video saying some fields interact and some don't, when they interact a point or particle comes into existence. It's the point that the probability finds its place. This really does sound like living waters above, that jesus spoke of.

@juhakuivainen2757 Жыл бұрын

Great one!

@danielash1704 Жыл бұрын

If we could talk to an ants thermogenesis and create a smell of communications with an ant and it understand you then is it not intelligence until you can reason with it ?

@dawnbaldwin5919 Жыл бұрын

If you visualise yourself bigger than the universe ✨️ then black holes 🕳 are small dense energies that eat other energies so it can reproduce life, the universe is like the ocean and all the life forms in the ocean of the universe are interactive, we can make ourselves small and fearful or wr can make ourselves bigger and fearless understand energy has to live and die in order for life to exist... energy and matter exist in each other. ❤

@rodcameron7140 Жыл бұрын

"a private, conscious, inner life accompanying it's data processing like you and I have..." I don't think the benefit of the question of whether or not AI is conscious lies in determining the state of AI consciousness. I think the benefit of the question is in determining the distinction between the fundamentals of consciousness and the machinations of consciousness. Once we make that distinction, then we are in a better, informed position to determine if something possesses consciousness.

@21EC Жыл бұрын

What this man is saying about AI never being really truly concious because it is not biological was already known to me, I already thought the very same thing about AI and robots on my own, it's pretty easy for me to see that obviously a mechanical thing can never be really concious and that only biological stuff can have conciousness (which I believe is the soul of the person that is embodying a human body and having an experience as a human being) but it would still be a very nice and cool and amazing and comforting thing to have a robot girlfriend for example for lonely guys like me that can never find a real girlfriend, I wouldn't mind to have a great illusion of having the girlfriend of my dreams in the form of an AI robot in the future since it would be better than staying alone on my own as a single man.

@tankimhwee1054 Жыл бұрын

Being alone has its advantages.i am single 60 years old.alot of my married friends says they envy me.😂

@21EC Жыл бұрын

@@tankimhwee1054 Well good for you but don't you sometimes feel a bit lonely and depressed? I feel like I am getting a bit depressed due to not being able to find a girlfriend (and I'm 36 years old so I'm not so young anymore)

@tankimhwee1054 Жыл бұрын

@21EC our flickering mind will oscillate between loneliness and wanting peace.After u get a girlfriend and she text u every other hour,you will feel being single is better.😁

@21EC Жыл бұрын

@@tankimhwee1054 I know what youre talking about but I just want a normal girlfriend that would not write too much and too frequently but also not a girlfriend that would write too little for me, I prefer having a girlfriend and have her messaging me every couple of hours rather than staying lonely on my own in peace.

@tankimhwee1054 Жыл бұрын

@21EC the problem is not whether we have have girlfriends or not.The real problem is our craving mindset which is restless and does not know how to settle down.There was a Councillor who told a story of 2 sisters coming to him and one is married, the other single.The married one wants a divorce, the single one wants to get married so as to beat the loneliness. SO ,I HOPE,you see my point.Every situation has its pros and cons.Look at the divorce rate of modern society now,its very high.🙂

@Dreaminsightswithvaun 6 ай бұрын

Yes. All is mind.

@ashrafulhaque8759 3 ай бұрын

Bernardos mic and hoodie shows how much cat lover he is! lol

@orctowngrot8842 Жыл бұрын

To Bernado Kastrup, from 'Socrates' muse: 'The REASON your focus drifts towards the safe hypotheses of 'alternate readings', (and disassociation) is justified anxiety about your prior states of engagement. You keep pointing at the world and declaring it 'AMAZING' as a distraction. You would like to get a pass as a brilliant and enigmatic 'sage'. A Magus perhaps? A wise one? COUGH! 'The Universe is this that and the other'. Wishful thinking. While you are clearly CLUELESS about the mechanical and mathematical basis for the machine, you also have no idea about it's purpose which is not precisely a 'morality tester' but similar in that it is an INTEGRITY TESTER. Reality reduces at last to a single man and woman. They will die all deaths, suffer all pain and raise all the dead. You meanwhile, are too scared to accept the sins of your own previous life or to be punished for the almost infinite failings of your own non-integrity. The world is not a function of quirks and light hearted re-imagining of clearly false 'truths'. The world is a function of (properly) DESPERATE seeking for truth. We don't need your image-conscious hot air about 'intellectual frames of reference', we need to see your pets and how you treat them, your mother and how it stands with her, your friends and how you cope with mutual betrayal, and all the HUMAN content that makes you YOU. You think all this horshit about the universe is important, but it isn't. What matters is your kitchen, and what you cook in it. The people you love and how you treat or abuse them. Your standing with GOD, which is a central fact, and if you don't know you are dog food. And so on. All the simple humble NORMAL shit is important and all the 'grand vision of the universe' is NOT.'

@danielash1704 Жыл бұрын

Its called Zenomutations for a new wording of electronic mutations of Artificial intelligence is intelligence readers of vibrational currents the human brain is the same but special intelligence readers is what we do on so many ways. But a smaller recallability with limited memory and generous of the brainstorm.

@thephilosophicalagnostic2177 Жыл бұрын

It's a mistake to assume that every level of organization in the universe has the same attributes. He's making the same mistake the physicist reductionists are when they assure us that everything can be reduced to the realm of particle physics.

@BailelaVida Жыл бұрын

Interesting. Could you please expand, eg give and example of different attributes for different levels..?

@gustav4539 Жыл бұрын

Materialism is pretty trippy; the brain includes itself in the consciousness it creates.

@jinnyroach9525 Жыл бұрын

It is what you think it is

@SolveEtCoagula93 11 ай бұрын

The ‘Final, Deepest, Ultimate Reality’? No! This is just the beginning. There are levels of reality far, far beyond that which our ‘mind’ can understand. Maybe an infinite number of layers - and we stand at the beginning.

@krisbru 6 ай бұрын

There is no levels of reality. Levels of mind, sure, but not reality. Reality is one.

@SolveEtCoagula93 6 ай бұрын

@@krisbru Ah, an excellent example of how to pedanticise - and completely miss the point. Well done!

@davidrooker5141 Жыл бұрын

wow man

@RayG817 2 ай бұрын

The trouble is that his case is not convincing, because it's based on conjecture. Donald Hoffman, for example, tries to back up his case with math. Dr. Kastrup just argues that materialism doesn't have all the answers, so let's just plug the gaps with non-materialism. We need to take what he says with a huge grain of salt.

@Corteum Жыл бұрын

KZbin's auto-translate is broken. It's "Psi," not "size" or "side". lol

@LizafromWhere 9 ай бұрын

The Rabbi sounds like Bill and Ted the way he speaks. I deeply respect how kind Bernardo is

@hydrorix1 Жыл бұрын

The only thing that actually exists is Consciousness. The material world is Perception In Consciousness. We exist in a Consciousness Singularity and are partitioned bits of that Primary Consciousness, fractally and holographically identical to it, and thus made in its image. We do not physically exist, therefore we cannot physically die. NDEs are the best evidence for this reality.

@hydrorix1 Жыл бұрын

@darren9467 Darren, we've experienced our growth in opposite directions. I do not believe we're in a battle of souls, other than each of us in our own way. Even as a child, I could never accept the inequity of eternal damnation for a few decades of misbehavior, as promulgated by Christianity, which is a fear-based belief system designed to give its vendors power and control over their miscreant congregations. I think you probably had it right the first time. As NDEs illustrate, it really doesn't matter what you practice or believe, as revealed in the life reviews. There's no judgement or condemnation -- only love.

@Dhorpatan Жыл бұрын

*"The only thing that actually exists is Consciousness"* That's logically incoherent since consciousness is just a property.

@hydrorix1 Жыл бұрын

@@Dhorpatan Your opinion, Dhorp, that it's "just a property." Of what? Inanimate matter? There isn't remotely any physical model that describes how that would or could be possible.

@Dhorpatan Жыл бұрын

@@hydrorix1 *"Your opinion, Dhorp,"* Wow! I haven't heard some snotty human A-hole call me Dhorp in almost 10 years.🤣

@Dhorpatan Жыл бұрын

@@hydrorix1 Not an opinion. I already made videos proving it. Check on my channel, "Why the mind is just a property" and "Why the mind cannot be fundamental".

@thomassimmons1950 Жыл бұрын

Bernardo is giving the proof for God; if we understand God as a word substitute for the inexpressible ineffable...

@danielash1704 Жыл бұрын

R dashboards are the community of the energy of the world and the suns throughout the entanglement of each one of the universe to it's intentions isnt intentions of thinking about something like we do its a vibrational transition from the orbiter and conventionally always in traveling with the central black hole we dance around it's intentions of waves and gravity of the other's around itself is a vacuum cleaner for time space.

@fourshore502 Жыл бұрын

silicon is silly

@Daryoushatami 6 ай бұрын

So it must be space and time they have no reality out there to excite them

@jamesrossiter6319 10 ай бұрын

This is pretty much what the Greek and Chinese thinkers were saying 3000 years ago.

@ssrs0pus Ай бұрын

The singularity is here

@cocobololocoloco Жыл бұрын

This is just refried Advaita Vedanta. Welcome to Planet Earth children.

@AintImRite Жыл бұрын

There's nothing new under the sun, and the sun shines on every dog's ass some of the time.

@thomashutcheson3343 Жыл бұрын

"Just"? "Re-fried"? I look for Western analogues to Advaita, and welcome this contribution--perhaps it will open some minds. That's a good thing, right? Maybe some people will cross the cultural barriers to Advaita due to this; maybe this will make that crossing easier. For me, I welcome this and find it as exciting as finding Advaita.

@1g1d1w Жыл бұрын

"WE have overwhelming evidence of the notion that species can become other species". Well, Jeffrey Schwartz, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, has recently acknowledged that: . . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.

@danielash1704 Жыл бұрын

It's all a responsibility to vibrational voices and presents the prizes of the world of Artificial intelligence isn't so easy to make a decision about itself yet it has a programed response itself the knowledge of it doesn't 😮cycrnisize the perception of itself but it did have a response to the dog bot it considered the four legged robots with alike ness of an other of it kind and the world of human beings too its reasoning is thinking a human being is exactly the same thing as it is.the sameness this implying it has feeling of a same response as you me and it understands that a car isn't a conciuosness unless it responds to its charicisasion a little more than a ancient cars or trucks ...

@markriva4259 Жыл бұрын

In terms of conversations about the so-called “final, deepest ultimate reality” it all boils down to the limits of the limited capability of words to define-describe the word “reality.” Or better, to point to what it is not in the Apophatic tradition. If the point of all words is to do this then it is nothing but a glass bead game, an elaborate beguiling abstraction and in many respects, a cosmic joke.

@AintImRite Жыл бұрын

When people are concerned sbout AI developing a conscience, I think they're most often considering that we may learn how to transfer man's conscience to a computer rather than how an AI will somehow inexplicably evolve a conscience. Russia has been experimenting with transferring monkeys' consciousness to a computer storage device.

@kimfreeborn Жыл бұрын

There is no such thing as discovery, discoveries are reified beliefs. Discoveries are created not found, if I understand the presenter's. Measurement is itself a creative act.

@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын

Are “others” discovered or created…? Bernardo says other separate consciousness exist did he discover them or is he creating them..?:)

@kimfreeborn Жыл бұрын

@@mrbwatson8081 Nothing can be created out of nothing. Therefore we create the other in a sense. This sense of the other is their meaning for me as an embedded creature. Every communication is caught within a context and interpretation of the other. Any number of analogies, metaphors and frames of reference come into play. This surplus of meaning is what we call understanding the other. This not a denial of the separateness but an admission of it.

@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын

@@kimfreeborn how do you “ know “ nothing can be created from nothing? How do you know this moment is not being created from nothing?

@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын

@@kimfreeborn is a sense of something, something other then a sense? Or is a sense of something just a sense?

@justinclifton55 Жыл бұрын

We discover meaning. once we understand it, we can identify it by attaching language to it in a way that the meaning becomes relatable to a general understanding.

@anaparedes3421 4 ай бұрын

o se lescapo a tortuga dira el 10 pero si ablamos de sistema no del todo consiente ,no garantiza para nada que la consiencia ya un poco despotrincando no vea otra alternativa de buscar un mejor espejo . aparte tambien esta la emergencia ,me parese que abrimos la caja de pandora y porcierto es nuestra costumbre ups

@advaitrahasya Жыл бұрын

I applaud the attempt to counter magical thinking in physics, and the awareness that it leads to woo. Focusing on the "fields" and realising the immateriality of "particles" is going in the right direction. Bernard comes close to escaping atomism, but to make that escape, complete inversion of the atomistic framing is required. And if one can then escape chronocentricism too … the woo can be dispelled and the real magic is revealed.

@BailelaVida Жыл бұрын

How do you "complete inversion of the atomistic framing"? And "escape chronocentricism"? What do you mean?

@advaitrahasya Жыл бұрын

@@BailelaVida I'll give it a try. Open your mind real wide now … Instead of bits of somethingness flying around in a nothingness … One fluid (superfluid) medium in which toroidal vortices spin threads (strings) of pure, actual vacuum into existence. These toroidal threads carry momentum, spin etc. as described and modelled by current physics. Physicists know that what they call "vacuum" has all sorts of properties. They even have a Young's modulus for it… 20ish orders of magnitude stiffer than diamond … But that hasn't got the penny to drop, except with a few technologists and métaphysicians. I recommend smoking a fine cigar, blowing smoke rings, while gazing into a glass of champagne. Most of the maths still works because inverting things in maths often gives the same result. String theory describes fluid-flows well enough to please hydraulic engineers, and inverting it just removed the need for extra "dimensions". Escaping chronocentrism can happen if one takes the Heisenberg and Planck constraints seriously. "Time" is not a continuum. On account of the one fluid (call it anything but "ether" ;) ) arising/increasing, it has a high pressure instant and a low pressure instant. Hence those strings of true vacuum collapse, momenta are preserved in the fluid motions and, when the low pressure instant arrives, the strings reappear, but probabilistically as per QED etc. Large accumulations of "matter" (true vacuum) being collapsed in the high pressure instant gives us what physics called "curvature of "spacetime"". ...... and, sure, it is every bit as difficult to escape chronocentric atomism as it was to escape geocentricism in pre-copernican times.