The History Channel's terrible video games...

The History Channel, great at telling history...not so good at making video games.
Chapters:
00:00 - Intro
0:38 - Ice Road Truckers
02:19 - Battle for the Pacific
06:45 - Great Battles of Rome
07:41 - Nation Divided
10:08 - Secret Missions
11:52 - Verdict
If you enjoy this review then feel free to leave a like, comment and subscribe, and check out my playlist "The most awful games" for more reviews.
Music used: "Fury Road" Fast Action 8 Bit Rock by HeatleyBros

[@CrystalFire626]

Oh my god, I laughed so hard when you showed this audio mixing in Battle for Pacific. That shit is hilarious. Great video by the way, really like your channel🤌

[@tosspotytp6341]

They’re like oatmeal, edible but bland

[@impoopnrightnow906]

Your videos are awesome, man. If KZbin didn't hide small creators and only promote idiots who already have millions of subscribers, your channel would definitely get more attention.

[@EarthboundX]

Played the two Civil War games on the Xbox 360 somewhat recently. Pretty much feel the same, they aren't "good" but they aren't totally awful either. Boring 5 out of 10 games. Which is sometimes worse than a game that's just terrible. People are making videos on that Gollum game for a reason after all. Something being that terrible can be more interesting sometimes.

[@GlidersGames]

Get this man more subs!

[@laksirabderrahmane3292]

Funfact there is more history channel games about civil war and ww2 called respectivly : history channel 1940 battle of britain and history channel civil war great battles and history channel civil war battle for alamo independence

[@thesacredlobo]

I'm surprised you didn't bring up "History - Great Empires: Rome" for the DS. Albeit that game is a port of "Legion Gold" a PC game released in 2003 that was an updated version of "Legion" a game that had come out a year prior. So it's iffy combat is based on the PC version where players have very little control of battles beyond giving a few basic orders and positioning troops before the fight begins. Though the DS port does have stability issues that crop up if you upgrade to many towns at the same time as you near your goal of dominating a region. And regardless of which version your looking at it's impossible to go for a full conquest campaign which is pretty annoying in my opinion.

[@isaacclarke3835]

I loved the History Channel Civil War games, grew up with it on the PS2, so I really don't see to many problems, but Battle for the Pacific? I never really liked it.

[@Gruntvc]

Cauldron also made Soldier of Fortune Payback and Jurassic The Hunted. I liked Jurassic The Hunted, it's basically budget Turok 2008. Their History Channel FPS games weren't good. Oh wait, they also made a Secret Service FPS game that's budget Call of Duty lol.

[@UltimateDragonX9999]

You should review Astro boy the video game next for both Wii and DS versions

[@CourtneyB444]

I didn't even know the History Channel had games, I see why now cus they are painfully mediocre. Awesome video btw!

[@ChaseMC215]

Apparently the PS2 port of Battle for the Pacific is better than the main console version. Yeah it"s still garbage, but it is way better. The PS2 port was NOT developed by Cauldren

[@someguyonyoutube3229]

At least they‘re better than most phoenix games..

[@Texasmilitarydepartmentvid9654]

You forgot Patton

[@Fan_Of_Things6876]

Tbh I want to try the first person shooters

[@LouBettino]

What’s a PlayStation mini?

[@AlcatraZZ17]

Battle for the Pacific is on the same engine as Soldier of Fortune Payback

[@dawayneridenour1623]

Hey spice lord here’s a game u can play Kane and lynch dead men

[@RiVer-Parish]

Atleast you got to play a part of history 😂😂.

[@Styinee]

Ehh.. Ice road truckers manga was better

[@kingwokester7324]

DON’T FORGET ME!

[@lukeohenry9422]

DONT FORGET ME!