The history of all Chinese, Tungusic, Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, Turkic, Vietnamese and European states within the boundaries of political and cultural East Asia.
Пікірлер: 2 300
@OllieBye7 жыл бұрын
I don't know why I haven't seen this until now, I can't put into words how useful this is.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I was able to help!
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
@OllieBye7 жыл бұрын
***** That's perfect, thanks for sharing.
@adrianatgaming86407 жыл бұрын
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
@juiweiyang10336 жыл бұрын
Confucius Ideology Video Book kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXvUpYiGqpiqpac
@KorZen107 жыл бұрын
3:39 That goes so perfect with the music xD
@aeoncatlord20777 жыл бұрын
sui China collapse
@user-yu3ei7vq2y7 жыл бұрын
lol
@isaackim58806 жыл бұрын
Agree😂😂
@noihsok80555 жыл бұрын
Weeeeew
@askeraskerov63994 жыл бұрын
@X1GenKaneShiroX5 жыл бұрын
Very useful video and excellently made with some top notch songs in it which attracted me to it.
@based_hun91966 жыл бұрын
Great Video!
@Neverdyingpride3 жыл бұрын
very well made
@nationalistfromcanada34977 жыл бұрын
*Cheerful music plays while Mongol Empire subjugates most of the known world.*
@rete51322 жыл бұрын
more cheerful music after the Ming dynasty recovers china proper, occupies Karakorum and fractures the mongol regimes
@Orgil.2 жыл бұрын
@@rete5132 ming didnt occupy Karkorum
@rete51322 жыл бұрын
@@Orgil. I am pretty sure they did when Emperor ChengZu launched five campaigns into Mongolia circa 1410s, I remember they occupied it twice
@Orgil.2 жыл бұрын
@@rete5132 yeah they sacked Karakorum and Esen Taishi takes revenge in battle of tumu
@rete51322 жыл бұрын
@@Orgil. Do you know anything about betrayals among the components of Ming army? Ive seen reports that indicate the eunuchs who had control of cavalry betrayed the Ming and helped Essen Taishi in anhilating the Ming army
@siabe35574 жыл бұрын
very useful
@tye36307 ай бұрын
Few Noticeable Errors: Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that. Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia. Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
@user-bk8ul4bf8l7 жыл бұрын
이런거 만드는거는 역시 이분이 갑인듯 하다
@user-td2np1sb4n7 жыл бұрын
정말 잘 만든 영상입니다 역사 덕후에게 성지가 될 듯 싶네요
@seer33367 жыл бұрын
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate. Just a little flaw that I found. ( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58) What do you think?
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
@seer33367 жыл бұрын
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
@watermelon5406 жыл бұрын
Such a Great Clip! Thanks for sharing such a nice work with us. Must took a bunch of time making this video.
@user-fd7fx5in6r2 жыл бұрын
이 사람 한국인이에요 ㅋㅋ
@user-ll2jc1wr7y7 жыл бұрын
현대 사학에서 납득할만한편이네요 유튜브에서 만들어진 영상중에선 가장 좋습니다.
@s.k.9267 жыл бұрын
Thanks! You`re very good at eastasia history! (I`m Korean)
@5thousandwon5 жыл бұрын
발해 부흥운동까지 정확히 표현하신 게 대단하네요...ㄷㄷ
@sjpark88603 жыл бұрын
ㅇㅈ ㅋㅋㅋ 정안은 한국인도 잘 모르던데,,
@ronaldonazario8433 жыл бұрын
ㅇㅈ
@1967IlIlIl2 жыл бұрын
발해운동은 요사같은데 나오는걸로암
@user-yl9ff1td2z Жыл бұрын
정안국은 물론이고 소고구려도 있음
@yueyumyum7827 Жыл бұрын
뭐 몇년이면 몰라도 거의 반세기 이상 눌러박힌 나라라서
@dauniniloilo5 жыл бұрын
와우 잘 보겠습니다.. 드래곤님 요즘은 뭐 하시는지요. 오늘 드래곤님 영상들을 접하게 되었는데 다 공부하고 싶어요. 감사합니다.
@crazyboris73927 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Amazing work as always! However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems. One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea. As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
@KoreanSentry7 жыл бұрын
Fyi, Japan wasn't united country at the time.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
+KoreanSentry Neither was any of the steppe countries. I couldn't possibly map out every individual daimyo.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
Karakuni Nara 류쿠 왕국이 류쿠 열도를 통일하기 전에 오키나와에도 삼국시대가 있었다고 하네요.
@kahungkagan2 жыл бұрын
Can you please do an updated video on this? I’m so curious to see how each language family displaced the other
@galacticpenguintv67527 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@pascha1207 жыл бұрын
Fantastic work! Any chance you'll do a map like this for South East Asia?
@sigong00007 жыл бұрын
그래도 정확하시다
@batukaganbat60937 жыл бұрын
great video. thank you very much from Mongol
@NordeGrasen345 жыл бұрын
Batuka Ganbat One of my favorite empires is Mongolian
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
@zedz43972 жыл бұрын
Do you mean Inner Mongolians?
@OrionAltHist7 жыл бұрын
Lol the same thing happens to me. I always save my videos in 1080p and after they're uploaded to KZbin, I can only view them in 720p.
@gg-ns8ig5 жыл бұрын
스타일이 많이 달라지셨네여. 년도 넘어가는게 빨라짐
@user-eg2vt8vv4m4 жыл бұрын
이 영상에서 첫번째로 나온 음악의 제목이 뭐죠?
@user-np4cd4ph1z2 жыл бұрын
4:42 is the traditional korean rhythm:)
@tib77922 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you put Tibet in the map? I think that Tibet is closer to East asia rather than any other region. However nice video!
@NIDELLANEUM2 жыл бұрын
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@tib77922 жыл бұрын
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
@historicalmapanimator61067 жыл бұрын
I just found your chain , very good content and great video !!
@JcDizon3 жыл бұрын
Where did you get the music for your videos from? They're pretty catchy
@user-fd7fx5in6r2 жыл бұрын
Maplestory bgm
@Roo-vy2cI9 күн бұрын
Shanghai waitan!
@user-td2np1sb4n7 жыл бұрын
great !! Love from Korea
@kierahicks93142 жыл бұрын
good job
@papazataklaattiranimam2 жыл бұрын
Not really
@user-du7df3xl3b7 жыл бұрын
훌륭하다..! 세심한것까지 표현을했다.!
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :) I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then KZbin butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video. EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took KZbin really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless! EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
@egemensahin14897 жыл бұрын
xianghou bc 1000 or 500 born in .
@egemensahin14897 жыл бұрын
Mongol = Turk We are Altaic people . Ok You make mongol and Turk but you forgive alot Turkic dynsty and country
@major35697 жыл бұрын
sorry,I have opinion of you.You're a typical Korean,it's complete ignorance for West of ancient China(central Asia)and the Tibetan Empire(Stress).
@egemensahin14897 жыл бұрын
ı now.
@egemensahin14897 жыл бұрын
:D
@c2e1a984 жыл бұрын
이게 레전드지
@user-lj8tn5mu5y2 жыл бұрын
첫번째랑 두번째곡 메이플 무슨 브금이죠? 아무리 생각해도 기억이 안나네ㅠ
@Justt4366 жыл бұрын
4:26 lol the music! "aaaaaaaand China is broken again!"
@user-yj1zy2bz8nАй бұрын
没办法,社会矛盾积累需要突破口,除非能不断殖民其他地区,不然任何古代帝国都会分裂。
@corea3597 жыл бұрын
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
일단 1882년의 조약에서는 조선이 청의 속국이라고 표기되었고, 문서상에서만 그런 게 아니라 실실적으로도 위안스카이가 조선 정부에 들어오는 등 간섭이 심했기 때문에 1880년대 만이라도 그렇게 표기한 것입니다.
@corea3597 жыл бұрын
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
corea359 이 영상에서 조선이 청의 영토로 표기 된 건 아닙니다. 다만 독자적인 외교권이 있었다는 점은 미처 생각하지 못했네요.
@msmmoa89352 жыл бұрын
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@tammy22342 жыл бұрын
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
@yurialbertofloressalas52944 жыл бұрын
6:18 Azuchi-momoyama
@pastthink2 жыл бұрын
Can you tell me where you get your information for your research?
@user-sw2df4fu6i7 жыл бұрын
이 프로그램 이름이 뭐예요?? 한번 해보고 싶게 생김 ㅎㅎ
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
지도는 Photoshop Elements 8.0으로 그렸고 영상은 Premiere Pro CC로 제작했습니다.
@dsong20063 жыл бұрын
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
@daltonmiller5590 Жыл бұрын
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them. With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
Turkic has always been a predominantly spoken language, used at the courts of the local rulers, in the army, by rural or nomadic populations, and as a lingua franca among the multiethnic tribal confederations. It was even the language of communication in the Mongol army. Turkic has also been a supra-regional language of communication among smaller communities of speakers of minority languages and a means of communication among people of different ethnic backgrounds in certain social and professional groups, e.g. the Bāzārī class in Teheran.
@born_this_way Жыл бұрын
Proto-Türkçe'nin konuşulduğu en erken tarih ne zaman olabilir? Çoğu kaynak MÖ 500 dese de inandırıcı gelmiyor
@Sadoyasturadoglu Жыл бұрын
@@born_this_way Özellikle Proto-Moğolca ve Proto-Slavcadan daha yaşlı olduğu bariz.
@Sadoyasturadoglu Жыл бұрын
@@born_this_way Dallanıp budaklanması Oğur dili ile ayrılma falan düşünülürse mö 500 çok geç bir tarih.
@born_this_way Жыл бұрын
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Proto-Moğolca çok yeni zaten bildiğüm kadarıyla Cengiz Han döneminde konuşuluyordu. Ayrıca haklısın bu kadar geç olmamalı
@user-yj1zy2bz8nАй бұрын
突厥只是东方的失败者罢了,被唐朝击败驱逐到亚洲西部的失败游牧民族,
@yebai37095 жыл бұрын
some mistake: 1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ,it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ,after Yue annex Wu,they had too many land ,so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE. 2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang , Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique,but they haven't appear in the time.
@matthewmann89696 жыл бұрын
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
@rete51322 жыл бұрын
China (China proper, Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan)
@user-hn4qr8ty6f Жыл бұрын
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China. Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people. After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate. After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@dky7090 Жыл бұрын
@山田次郎:琉球独立
@yidminselaks Жыл бұрын
@@user-hn4qr8ty6f Taiwan refers to itself as the republic of China. I think it should be considered "China".
@user-hn4qr8ty6f Жыл бұрын
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China. Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
@pozk-tf6ey5 жыл бұрын
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people. Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times. Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
@user-bk7ew3tz8o5 жыл бұрын
Thank you my brothers. We will never forget our Yakut and siberian brothers in the north.
@ohfuck69585 жыл бұрын
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
@peterpark84864 жыл бұрын
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
@ilove63013 жыл бұрын
잘 만들었군요.. 아시아 역사... 한중일... 흥망성쇠를...전체적으로 볼 수 있어서...
Dai Viet opened its territory deep south into the DNA country
@szqecs6 жыл бұрын
Please do one for Europe and the Middle East.
@Haruuuu875 жыл бұрын
Lol shanghai bgm from maplestory? :D
@gonkong56384 жыл бұрын
Lmao we all like maplestory.
@nem91927 жыл бұрын
거의 팩트만 써서 만들었구만, 중국인이 만들었으면 Koreanic 부분에 고구려가 있 수가 없다, 환빠는 쉿!
@D-day_75 жыл бұрын
Nemo Kim 걍 팩트임 원나라시대도 짧지만 잘 표기했고
@fanoffukase46394 жыл бұрын
근데 저기서 요동이 진나라 영토로 표기되어 있는데 진시황이 요동에 비석을 세우라고 세운게 오늘 중국의 난하강이라고 요하강보다 더 서쪽에 있는 지역이래요 그렇기 때문에 진나라가 요동 땅을 차지했다는 근거는 없어요
@gjgsm173 жыл бұрын
Bgm을 들어보셈... 메이플스토리임...
@shiruwa46173 жыл бұрын
진짜 환빠들 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@user-qx1cr6ev5m3 жыл бұрын
환빠가 뭐에용??
@Your_Local_Dawg3 жыл бұрын
0:01 I like how the dynasty name have a question mark on it
@riza-2396 Жыл бұрын
It's like Troy, some thing really was there, but people are not sure about if it is really called Troy back then, same with Xia, it could have a different name at, because the Shang after it was also called Yin...
@kisaragiayami6 ай бұрын
@@riza-2396 that's not entirely accurate. Shang was the name of the country, Yin was the name of the people who ruled it. In the case of Xia, the people who ruled the country were called the Xiahous. I'm pretty sure the video owner put the question mark there because there is actually no archaeological evidence that this country even existed.
@riza-23966 ай бұрын
@@kisaragiayami No you are totally wrong, Yin is not the name of the people who ruled it, the people are just Shang people. Yin is the capital city of the later half of Shang dynasty, it is famous because Pangeng's decision of moving the capital city to Yin brought prosperity to Shang. Xiahou is also not the ruler of Xia, the ruler has 2 titles, before Qin Shi Huangdi it was Wang, translated to King, after him it was Huangdi or just Huang or Di, translated to emperor. The rulers of Xia, Shang and Zhou are all Wang, translated to King. Xiahou is a family name, meaning the Hou of Xia, Hou is a kind of nobel in ancient China. The Zhou dynasty had 5 levels of nobles: Gong, Hou, Bo, Zi, Nan. This is different depending on different dynasties. When Zhou defeated Shang, Xia people were settled in Qi(it's qǐ not qí), the ruler of Qǐ changed from Hou to Gong and then to Hou and then to Bo, at the end Qǐ was annexed by Chu, the refugees of Qǐ immigrated to Lu, the Gong of Lu honoured them as Hou of Xia because the ancestors of those people. Which leads to the family name Xiahou. Also those are actually Shi, not Xing, the Xing are the original family names, but when population grows, split branches of families used Shi as their family names because there are too many people from the same families and it's hard to distinguish smaller branches. The Xing of ruler of Xia was Si, one of the eight oldest family names, their Shi was Xiahou, but it is not the same "hou" of Xiahou as the later ones from Qǐ, it's 后hòu not 侯hóu during the Xia dynasty. Xing and Shi only existed differently before Qin Shi Huangdi, after him Xing and Shi are the same meaning, just family names.
@DeadPyro966 жыл бұрын
Great video, but the music doesn't fit at all.
@mariocristianvalentinyun1547 жыл бұрын
근데 좀 이상한게 발해 요동은 당나라가 멸망하고 나서 완전히 먹은걸로 알고있는데요 발해가 생기면서 만주는 대부분 상실한게 당나라지만 요동반도 만큼은 영주라는 이름으로 있었던걸로아는데.
@radicalturkiye-anatolia15327 жыл бұрын
perfect video from Turkey
@cultureofturk7117 жыл бұрын
Altaic Peoples in History of East Asia - Korea, Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Japonic in Altai Family
@timx93337 жыл бұрын
LOL,nobody want to become the 'relative' of stupid turkey
@ohfuck69586 жыл бұрын
Sporting Nature yeah japonic is mixed Austronesian and Northeast asian/Korean.
@inouelenhatduy6 жыл бұрын
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
@stelline116 жыл бұрын
Japanese is also categorized as an isolated group like Korea...Austronesian theory is just a theory
@EgemenSahin5 жыл бұрын
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira . Black Poeples: Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan Aborgines ( Black-White mix) : Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) : Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens . White Peoples: Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
@jeansteriade35987 жыл бұрын
from about 500 C.E. mogher trybes (sumo-mogher) vassals of Koguryo in north = like ong-gur, maghiar - hungar? (sumo = saami?) from Ural mountain?
@user-nv4zl7od4t7 жыл бұрын
굉장히 잘 만드셨습니다. 한국분이십니까?
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
네 (하지만 일각의 주장에 따르면 한국인으로 위장하고 있는 중국 동북공정 학자이죠)
@user-wl1mh5xu7o7 жыл бұрын
The Dragon Historian ㅋㅋ
@user-nv4zl7od4t3 жыл бұрын
@@harlibedvii 한자음입니다. 유튜브 닉변하다가 그냥 지어본 거에요.
@user-nv4zl7od4t3 жыл бұрын
@@harlibedvii 감사합니다. ㅎㅎ
@classicmapper3647 жыл бұрын
Korea was splitted on Northern and Southern even in ancient times lol.
@g-rexsaurus7947 жыл бұрын
It was not, at least not with the same borders or in a cultural sesne.
@sigong00007 жыл бұрын
do you mean 850ce? balhae and sinra?
@GalBiMan7 жыл бұрын
Alex _ stop using fact!
@user-qe8rl8qu9e7 жыл бұрын
Alex _ and they grew rich and north Korea? Chinese and north korea russians are all poor...
@GavinLiuranium7 жыл бұрын
Probably an oxymoron
@ignegaaaaaaa7 жыл бұрын
You forgot to include the Tibetan Empire. It was a huge player during Tang Dynasty.
@misitan42z3 жыл бұрын
Tang dynasty: *proceeds to almost have it's size*
@user-cl7pm7zm3x3 жыл бұрын
No, Tibet not a part of video like India and other regions, until mongolian khoshuts conquered tibet in 17 century tibet dont participate
@barrows347 жыл бұрын
what sources did you use?
@nguyenhuuloi1996hy6 жыл бұрын
The music at 5:35 is fuckin awesome
@aslankhandemir84593 жыл бұрын
I think Nanzhao and Dali in modern-day Yunnan should also be listed as Sinitic.
this is exactlywhat I learned from my school in korea. other korean people who are complaining must have skipped class
@user-ql5cj2ui5g2 жыл бұрын
@@dou_june0v037 Are you saying that Koreans learn the history of the Tang Dynasty instead of the history of Korea?
@user-ql5cj2ui5g2 жыл бұрын
@@dou_june0v037 I am Korean but I have never learned the history of Tang Dynasty.
@user-ql5cj2ui5g2 жыл бұрын
@@dou_june0v037 But When Korean go to high school, Korean learn East Asian history and world history.
@user-ql5cj2ui5g2 жыл бұрын
@@dou_june0v037 Koreans learn about Korean history at school😊
@neungngyok65813 жыл бұрын
영상 일부분 찍어서 사용해도 괜찮을까요?
@TheDragonHistorian3 жыл бұрын
출처만 밝히신다면 괜찮습니다.
@neungngyok65813 жыл бұрын
@@TheDragonHistorian 감사합니다
@user-wz4hy6lw6q7 жыл бұрын
근데 역사룡님 백두산정계비가 세워진 19세기경부터 간도 조약이 맺어진 1909년 까지 간도가 조선2단계가 되거나 청-조 공동통치지역으로 분류되야도지않나요?
@user-wz4hy6lw6q7 жыл бұрын
그리고 조선 왕국이 세워진건 기원전 8세기경 아닌가요?
@user-fi2vi5xj7f3 жыл бұрын
@@user-wz4hy6lw6q 청동기 문화가 기원전 8세기 발견되는 건 맞지만 고조선이 그 때부터 존속해있었다는 건 근거가 없습니다
@matthewtopping20613 жыл бұрын
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
@p00bix2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Especially seeing as the Ainu people have roots in various peoples around the Sea of Okhotsk, not only the Jomon.
@daltonmiller5590 Жыл бұрын
You're right, but the distinction is still valid. While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences. Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism. So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
@awesomebob99377 жыл бұрын
6:57 name of the song please
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
Awesomebob99 (3) MapleStory - Mu Lung Dojo 4
@ultragamer49605 жыл бұрын
What’s the last song’s name?
@ID-il2ci4 жыл бұрын
great job
@cudanmang_theog4 жыл бұрын
Northern Laos and Central Laos were Vietnamese territories since 1479
@ohfuck69586 жыл бұрын
anyone can tell me what songs are in 2:25 and 4:28?
@user-od1ub1zx6j4 жыл бұрын
Maplestory molung dojo, maplestory secret floor
@user-hl8vu4ce5t5 жыл бұрын
1번째브금이름이뭔가요?
@alphaundpinsel24312 жыл бұрын
one inacurracy, the chinese dynasties had control over yunnan starting from han
@san98536 жыл бұрын
환빠들과 이 같은 영상을 보는게 싫다 ㅋㅋ 그리고 이게 잘못된게 뭐가있음 니들 역사 헛으로 배움?
@djydytsanstvbj3 жыл бұрын
역사를감성으로배운
@bigdarknose-30005 жыл бұрын
I'm Korean and this video is very good. I dont understand why some people deny this.
@oswaldclara90174 жыл бұрын
muchim golbaengi ancient Tibet empire also belongs to east asia
@user-qd8pl6es8f23 күн бұрын
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
@SemiBoba5 жыл бұрын
I feel many kingdom you showed is not right. Like Yuan and Qing. It is not Sinitic. It is Han Chinese being invaded. Your map feels like it is governed by two ethnicities together which might make people feel Han Chinese are always invaded others.
@dashaae21004 жыл бұрын
Jialun Yang Yes. Yuan is created and ruled by Mongols and Qing is created and ruled by Manchus. But he did it because the rulers have went cery deep into chinese culture
@dcarter60583 жыл бұрын
Well done. Very well done. I am not a professional historian, but I feel you made this from a very fair and objective perspective. I read some complaints and criticitical comments on the way you did. But, please don't be swayed by those nationalists and manipulators from different countries. Just give facts, only facts. A Big hug from abroad for Koreans and people in other Asian countries who are constantly bullied by certain big country!!!
@user-qj3tj3es1o3 ай бұрын
China must not manipulate Korean history.
@user-ef4ku2rh7y2 ай бұрын
是韩国棒子一天天意淫好吧😂
@user-mn6lt6pi7j Жыл бұрын
What all music is called?
@aleksanderolaf89117 жыл бұрын
Nice. But why have you skipped Tibetan and Burmese states?
@TheDragonHistorian7 жыл бұрын
I consider Tibet and Burma to be parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, respectively.
@AHMEDALI-vq4vc5 жыл бұрын
5:17 Genghis has joined the game
@yanyu31215 жыл бұрын
Then seconds later he left the game.
@snowyy.527511 ай бұрын
@@yanyu3121 He was too powerful and had to get nerfed
@goryeosanhorange7 жыл бұрын
명; 이렇게 치면 고려말 조선초까지 두만강 유역을 우리색으로 칠해야 하는거 아닌가요?
@TVBFAN112247 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the song/music?
@Haruuuu875 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/roHXmHyghbakm5Y A BGM from maplestory :D
@nightofnights93885 жыл бұрын
You skipped year 263.
@StarKnyan3 жыл бұрын
참고로 우리나라의 한민족은 예족과 맥족, 그리고 한(韓)족과 여러 소수족이 합쳐진 것입니다(주호와 우산 등). 지도에 나오는 예, 맥 그리고 삼한이 이를 의미합니다.
@user-tw4hu4hx6x2 жыл бұрын
거기에 말갈향도 약간 첨가
@thereasonwhy63132 жыл бұрын
당시 삼한은 지배층이 아닌 피지배층 토착민들이 대부분 고대일본어 혹은 그에 가까운 친척언어를 사용하던 야요이계였을거라는게 서양학계 주류학설이니 일본의 야요이족도 포함시켜야할것같음
@Yourmom-kz7wm2 жыл бұрын
Sdfp
@user-km8rs2yg9l Жыл бұрын
@@thereasonwhy6313 반도일본어설이 주류학설도 아니고 연구단계에 머물러 있는데 아직 검증이 필요한 학설을 넣는 건 아니라고 봄
@diddudrn Жыл бұрын
@@thereasonwhy6313 일본의 야요이 계통 자체가 유전적으로 지금 한국인들과 큰 차이가 없는데 삼한은 피지배 민족이고 야요이는 지배층이다? 뭔 소린지 모르겠네 거기다 주류 학설도 아니고?
@user-rp6ym1cn9c7 жыл бұрын
메이플 브금 신명나네
@tieudoanh53737 ай бұрын
How to know about king of buyeo in period Qin Dynasty because I only see that king of buyeo in period han dynasty :V
@JYellowPillow6 жыл бұрын
Whats the first song called?
@hexkobold98142 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
@Orgil.2 жыл бұрын
Hunnu(Xiongnu) is mongolian
@hexkobold98142 жыл бұрын
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
@Orgil.2 жыл бұрын
@@hexkobold9814 rouran is mongolian
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@Orgil. Xiongnu were Turkic just like Tiele lol
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
@@Orgil. Xianbei and Rouran are Para-Mongolic not Turkic or Mongolic
@HunsWithGuns7 жыл бұрын
it's like europa universalis 4
@okiedokie567 жыл бұрын
I've just noticed Kara Del is positioned in the wrong place
@farisan995 жыл бұрын
the problem with East Asia is that they have long history of fighting each other since like 2000 years ago. it is so long that their people and their latter successor were very traumatic, indoctrinate by their ancestors to dislike each other. why not take example in europe? name it English, France & Germany. they have long history of fighting and war each other. BUT they putting aside they hate relationship and form an alliances like EU (aside from Brexit). these 3 countries are considered "frenemies"
@ucchau1732 жыл бұрын
Exactly germany and france is friends just happen when germany lose in ww2 and their army(germany) became weak After that and it is how eu is created , if germany army is still strong and have nuke , i don't think their(france and germany) will be friends...
@huyi16809 ай бұрын
It’s not that I don’t want to, but I don’t dare. The strength gap between European countries is not big, so they can form the European Union, and East Asia will become a super China if they form an alliance.
@VoidViper7 жыл бұрын
Oh Maplestory Music. Oh memories.
@user-xm7su2ws6y9 ай бұрын
Balhae is good because it is correctly written as Korean history
@mudshovel2892 жыл бұрын
I learned that Korea has been around much longer than Japan.
@aurumferro Жыл бұрын
Yamato people came from the peninsula after all, modern Japanese are a mixture between Jomon people and Yamato
@park-li-hyeon Жыл бұрын
Of course, it became civilized from the area close to China.
@user-hn4qr8ty6f Жыл бұрын
Korean history dates back to Goryeo. The indigenous people of the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago were the Jomon people, and the Yayoi people who came from southern China and the Jomon people mixed little by little, and the Yamato people were born. The Yamato people (Wajin) of Kyushu lived in the southern part of the Korean peninsula, and the Han people lived in the northern part of the Korean peninsula. However, as the Tungusic tribe called Buyeo invaded the Liaodong Peninsula, the Han people fled to the south and interbred with the Wa people, giving birth to the Korean people. In terms of genetics, Han + Japanese + Tungus = modern Korean DNA. People who fled to Japan after the collapse of Baekje and Goguryeo had the genes of the Han O2 lineage.
@ganggang2537 Жыл бұрын
@@user-hn4qr8ty6f yeah the genetic/historic relationship between Korea and japan is similar to that of Turkey and Greece and I feel like there’s a huge misconception about the two peoples having a common origin. The first people to inhabit the Korean Peninsula were japonic speaking peoples with a similar genetic makeup to modern Japanese people until the proto koreanic speakers arrived from the steppe assimilating with them creating the modern Korean ethnicity. Modern Koreans = Tungus/mongol/Siberian tribes + yayoi agriculturalist. Modern Japanese = Yayoi agriculturalist + Jomon + austronesian tribes. The genetics of both nations cluster greatly from sharing the same agricultural yayoi component due to assimilation but have separate ethno linguistic origins
@maxb.m.52555 жыл бұрын
anyone knows the name of the song in the minute 3:30 ? please