🇰🇷 The History of Korea: Every Year

[@jamesdakrn]

19:19 I just got chills when the Korean Anthem started playing, especially considering that the Provisional Government of Korea was founded in 1919

[@ruxyam1]

I love that you even changed the land and ocean borders, the details are amazing

[@tutorialesminecraft8930]

This man really inspires me to do more history!! I really like ur videos. A lot of awesome information in just a 20 minute video!

[@DRsolochu]

서해 5도도 그렇고 굉장히 디테일하네요. 한국-외국간에 이견이 있는 부분은 가급적 객관적 시선으로 해주신 부분도 더욱 맘에 듭니다.

[@지해나-s4d]

디테일 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[@jaeyeonkim7656]

심지어 강화도 간척되는 것도 나옴 ㄷㄷ

[@regiecadiang2182]

@@지해나-s4d 지해나 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[@지해나-s4d]

@@regiecadiang2182 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[@ill-young]

Sea of japan 왜 아무도 지적안함

[@새우탕-f3p]

반란으로 인해 강등되어 도의 명칭이 바뀌는 부분이나 관찰사 소재지가 바뀌는 디테일까지 반영하신게 정말 대단합니다. 항상 재미있게 보고있습니다. 감사합니다.

[@지해나-s4d]

여기도 디테일 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[@seoul_9584]

To people who don't know about Chinese tributary system. The Chinese tributary system was a symbolic Confucian world order, with its basis in trade and philosophical relations between foreign states and various Chinese dynasties. This wasn't ruling system. This was a way of establishing formal diplomatic relations between Various Chinese dynasties and East Asian countries in the old days. Every countries in East Asia had hierarchical relationship each other. Every countries in East Asia had senior-junior, king-servant, big brother-little brother, teacher-student relationship. Traditionally, East asian diplomatic system was hierarchical. And the relationship were nominal. It was just establishing diplomatic relationship. East Asia's traditional diplomatic system should not be distorted as the Chinese rule.

[@yyyymmddhhmm]

Because China was the shit back in the days. Unlike what China has become right now, there was a sense of 'give and take' amongst the ancient, medieval Chinese empires. The reason why Koreans, especially from the Joseon era, were crazy about sending tribute (to Ming) was because the 'take' part was much more in quality and quantity than the 'give' part. This is why Koreans insisted on sending tribute four times a year when the Chinese initially had them do so once. Meanwhile, the Ryukuans and Japanese didn't get much incentives from Ming China in terms of trade. It would be a pardon to compare the tributary system to modern day China's expansionist, fuxxed up One Road policies that leaves every single state involved bankrupt.

[@shinsenshogun900]

@@yyyymmddhhmm Dunno what made the Ryukyu not emulate the Joseon Koreans, but the feudal Japanese just keep embroiling themselves into civil wars, nationwide and provincewide. Not even bustling cities would get some rest when samurai would brawl amidst marketplaces and that wokou pirates linger along pirate havens all over the Japanese shorelines. This was a low point in Chinese-Japanese trade histories when the Ashikaga shoguns cannot have the power to prevent trade losses due to feuding warrior elites. Turns out that modern day Silk and Belt Roads are just one way trips into unreliable, unwanted disasters

[@Dou_Y]

@@yyyymmddhhmm lmao kid your logic is from which universe, the ancient "giving away money" policy is bad, so the modern "making other states bankrupt" bad. lmaoooooooooooo

[@yyyymmddhhmm]

@@Dou_Y Sup, Jinping Junior.

[@zjelukjsxhr]

only worked during Ming dynasty. Joseon paid because Qing won the war

[@tsicsafjapan9371]

I'm looking forward to making a Japanese translation of your great video!!! * I will translate the English explanation in this video. * If there is a difference of the name between Korean and Japanese, I will translate like this: 東海(日本海) * I'm not a person who has learned the history of Korea well, so there may be misunderstandings. Please teach me about them if you find.

[@Rickyrab]

Nice! 👍🏼

[@사람-u9p7o]

Oh, it's really perfect. Thank you for the great video.

[@alexandercellante7553]

Hugs to South Korea from the USA! 🇺🇸❤️🇰🇷 I do a Korean martial arts sport and enjoyed watching a Korean do a ballet!! ^_^

[@NETHERITE_STAIRS_PHOTOCRAFT]

0:05 구석기 시대 C.30,000 BCE-C.8000 BCE 0:18 빗살무늬토기 C.8000 BCE-C.1300 BCE 1:18 민무늬토기 시대 C.1300 BCE-C.400 BCE 2:34 고조선 왕국 C.400 BCE-108 BCE 4:23 마한, 변한, 진한 108 BCE- 4:54 고구려 왕국 37 BCE-670 5:22 진한 108 BCE-30 6:56 마한 108 BCE-246 6:56 백제 왕국 246-663 10:04 통일신라 688-936 10:12 대발해국 699-997 11:40 고려 왕국 902-1392 14:20 몽골제국령 고려국 1270-1355 15:14 조선국 1393-1881 18:46 대조선국 1882-1896 18:52 대한제국 1897-1910 18:57 일본령 조선 (초선) 1910-1945 19:13 대한인민공화국 1945 19:13 대한민국 1946-2023

[@CARL_093]

the best thanks bro

[@thewarriorfrog]

I seriously don't understand what is the purpose of the spammer of the altaic hypothesis in the comments, it must be some kind of personality disorder.

[@夜行者-s2x]

The original Turkic people are East Asian. Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup Studies show: east asia people are C, N, O+（DQ）. Among them，the original turkic people N are very similar to O (chinese，korean，japanese), they came from the same gene haplogroup NO but absolutely different from J（J1+J2/Turkey） Type of east Mediterranean people. J1 is Arabic haplogroup J2 is Native Anatolian haplogroup,from hittite， Canaanites E1B is ancient greek,albanian and sub-saharan African haplogroup G-M201 is most commonly found in Georgia; it is found at even higher levels among many other regional and minority populations, such as the Ossetians, Turkish →60%-70%JGER1b，the Near/Middle East and southern Europe R1a+Q→Central Asian/Paleo-Siberians CNO→Proto-Altaic/Neo-Siberians Turks from Anatolia (the Turkish Republic) are not related to any of those people. A very small minority of people in Turkey carry genetic markers that are also found in Mongolia, Korean，Janpanese and elsewhere in Central Asia. This has to do with the fact that the Turkic invasion of Anatolia in the Middle Ages was mostly a cultural and religious one. Byzantines changed their language from Greek, Armenian or Assyrian to Turkic and their religion from Christianity to Islam.

[@夜行者-s2x]

The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria (northeastern China). They were partially agriculturalists but adopted a nomadic life. Than they started their journey to the West. (The Turkic migration). During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans/R1a). All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea（hg K2a/NO+C2）. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians K2b/Q+R1a Most Siberian have the N haplogroup. The people of this haplogroup came from the territory of modern China， Haplogroup NO split to haplogroup N and haplogroup O in south China . . Haplogroup N is dominant among East Siberians .. Its closest relative is haplogroup O which is the most common male haplogroup in East Asia and Southeast Asia It’s the haplogroup N that gives Siberia Sakha the East Asian looks. So it is not surprising some Yakut look Asian ‘East Asian DNA’ includes haplogroups CNO+DQ . These are the same haplogroups shared with Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Mongols, Tungusic etc. The first Turks (around 500 ce) were a mix of NOC just like the Han. Many either integrated into Chinese society or moved further west into Central Asia and eventually the Middle East JGE and East Europe R1aR1bI， Turkish males on average carry Haplogroup J2 as their main Y-DNA. This is the indigenous Haplogroup of the Middle East where it originated. Turks are closely related to the people of the Levant, Iranians, Caucasus people and Southern Europeans. That's why most modern Turks don’t look like Asians The ancient Turkic people are Mongoloid. They are from a region between northern China and Manchuria. The Xinglongwa culture is often regarded as the original homeland of the proto-Turks. Genetical, linguistical and cultural evidence strongly support a northern Mongoloid origin for Turks, close to the homeland of Mongolians and Tungusic peoples. The Tatars are a Turkic people, belonging to the Kipchak branchs. Modern Tatars have mixed with Slavic groups (Russians) but also with Iranian groups. Thus most Tatars have N and R1a The ancestors of the Hungarians were also a mixture of East Slavs/old european(Ydna R1a I2) and Ural-Altaic/Siberian(Ydna N-M231) The N hg has appeared various times in Eurasian history: Xinglongwa culture> major Y-DNA: N The ancient Finn-Uralians perhaps may represent the first wave of migrants from the east long ago (maybe 5-12kya). The Finnish-Uralic are the result of the mixture of I (old populations of Europe) and N (Uralic)

[@thewarriorfrog]

@@夜行者-s2x baseless claims without any single solid academic evidence

[@thewarriorfrog]

@@夜行者-s2x hmmm While Afro-Asiatic peoples usually carry E and it is known that J2 is of central Asian origin and even among Timur's descendants, it shows how ignorant you are to call J1 Arab and J2 Canaanite😅(the funny part is that the Canaanites must also be E since they are also part of Afro-Asiatic peoples)😂

[@thewarriorfrog]

@@夜行者-s2x Did the Greeks, Albanians and Sub Saharans have a common ancestor?😂😂😂 Hmmm Niger-Congo, Nilo-Saharan and Indo-European languages ​​have a common origin so 😅😅😅😅 I've never come across so much pseudo science in my life you make me laugh so much

[@perseusofmacedon6918]

Nice video! I would like to see a complete video of Greece from ancient times to modern

[@user-tw5wx9uw9b]

이 분 ㄹㅇ 디테일이 오지는게 1964년 조중변계조약으로 천지 절반 먹은것까지 표현함ㄷㄷ 진짜 디테일의 극치입니다👍

[@alexanderzarikov9916]

Very interesting video! Can you make history of Jeju Island please 🇰🇷

[@PlushPineapple]

You're right that would be a very interesting video

[@corea359]

헤아리지 못 할 만큼 얼마나 많은 손길이 갔을런지!

[@TheDragonHistorian]

거의 10년전 중학생 시절에 corea359님의 한국사 역사지도 영상을 보고 언젠가 나도 이런 영상을 만들어보겠다고 생각했는데, 이렇게 봐주셔서 정말 영광입니다.

[@kutwor5506]

That's as always a true masterpiece! So many details, you really love your country!

[@Minato_Akiyama03]

I approve! Let's go watch the Unified Korea back to its old glory Joseon in the future!

[@ju-v9f]

Nice video

[@슴리즌]

나라가 고정된 상황에서도 세세한 디테일을 보고 놀랐습니다. 이만한 퀄리티면 그 어디에 내놔도 손색이 없는 수준이네요;

[@guymen1419]

유익하네요!

[@talkjian5281]

4000년 역사가 한 영상에 들어가다니 정말 대단하십니다

[@MROEnglishLessons]

Isn't Joseon a Myth?

[@talkjian5281]

@@MROEnglishLessons joseon is not a myth. It's real history

[@MROEnglishLessons]

@@talkjian5281 Oh, didn't now, thanks. Actually I meant Gojoseon, I mistyped.

[@MROEnglishLessons]

@@user-fd8ev2yv8r Oh right. If you were to say when did Korea Begin. When It was?

[@zjelukjsxhr]

@@MROEnglishLessons depends how you define country. people were there even 10,000BC. usually it has to be historic era. there are Gojoseon in history book in China and oldest relic of Gojoseon was from 2333BC. so it is considered to be around 2000BC to 500BC. no one is sure

[@jinishim1796]

awesome!!!

[@lukep.7529]

hey this is awesome looking and wonderfully researched i love your channel

[@inpsh]

좋은 영상입니다!

[@PRIMITIAE_030]

와.....엄청 디테일하네요 ㄷㄷㄷ

[@trollgey324]

Cool good job 👍

[@user-uf2df6zf5w]

Great Work! Will you da a reboot for China next?

[@TheDragonHistorian]

Thanks! Like I did with Korea this past year, I'm thinking about making some videos about individual dynasties first and then making my way towards a remake of "The History of China."

[@doomh_60]

thank you!

[@baksh1211]

4000년 역사를 한 영상에 담아내시다니 대단하십니다.. 모든 내용을 영어와 한국어로 자막을 해놓는 센스와.. 서해 5도도 표현하시고.. 보통 다른 사람들이 빼놓는 두막루와 같은 국가들도 빼놓지 않고 해주시다니 진짜 대단하십니다. 근데 궁금한 게 있습니다. 1800년 정도에서 인천의 크기가 커지는데 실제로 크기가 커진 건가요? (중국의 역사도 해주시면..큼큼)

[@Stir-fried_udon]

인천의 크기가 커진건 강화도를 간척하여 강화도의 면적이 넓어진 것 입니다.

[@baksh1211]

@@Stir-fried_udon 감사합니다!

[@xXxSkyViperxXx]

so the early history of korea usually also had a northern and southern state until it was united around a millennia ago by Koryo and Choson

[@bkjeong4302]

The hilarious thing is that since Goryeo (originally Taebong before Wang Gun took it over) was a resurrected Goguryeo (and not even for the first or the last time: Balhae was the first, and Balhae would itself resurrect itself as Jeongan and Later Balhae), Goguryeo did actually end up taking over the entire peninsula in the end.

[@Tod_x]

South Korea: Change leader North Korea: Change leader pose

[@soroushnikmehr8390]

very very good. I'm Kurd and I speak Kurdish/Persian/English/Finnish & Korean. I'm from Kurdistan Region, Kermanshah Province of IRAN. I love history of Korea very very much. Thanks for this post❤

[@soroushnikmehr8390]

@jhy6621

[@cloudyfreelancer9909]

이 영상을 만드시느라 얼마나 고생을 하셨을지… 덕분에 전 역사를 더 잘 알게 되었습니다. 공짜로 말이죠. 정말 감사 드립니다.

[@Anwwoo]

981년에 정안국이 부주(Buju)와 부여(Buyeo) 도시들을 점령한 것으로 나오는데, 본 부분은 어느 문헌에서 참고할 수 있을까요?

[@TheDragonHistorian]

발해부흥운동 지도자 연파(燕頗)가 부여부를 점령했다가 올야국 또는 정안국에 귀순한 것을 묘사한 것입니다. 「한편, 발해 유민국가인 정안국(定安國)이 981년 송나라에 보낸 글에 의하면 “부여부가 잠시 거란에 반기를 들었다가 모두 정안국에 들어왔다.”고 하였는데, 여기서 거란에 반기를 들었다는 것은 연파가 거란에 항거한 사실을 의미하며, 모두 정안국에 들어왔다는 것은 연파가 올야성으로 피신한 것을 지칭하는 것으로서, 이 때 정안국의 세력이 오사국에까지 미쳤던 것을 알 수 있다.」 출처: encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0036950

[@Seoul_Korea_]

다 좋은데, 고려시대의 고려왕 + 심양왕에 대한 것도 나왔다면 더 좋았을 것 같네요😊

[@yueyumyum7827]

그러게요 ㅋㅋ

[@피할_수_없으면_즐겨라]

잘보고 가용

[@alexanderjin1628]

Beautiful and fantastically researched video that definitely deserves more views - sorry for the Chinese ultranationalist comments. Can’t wait for the next upload!

[@夜行者-s2x]

這傢伙偷你的歷史，你跟他們說謝謝？你是傻嗎，韓國人的直系祖先O1b2根本就不是來自遼河文明紅山文化，他們不過是要東北的政治權利，萬不得已可以擴大領土，因為南中國離他們真的太遠，那裡才是韓國人真正來源

[@황진석-m3x]

Its okay we are very long time heard about chinese trolling That culture has been around for a long time not joke for real

[@blue-d4g]

Ultranationalists exist everywhere, the Koreans who think we used to rule China and the Japanese who revere the days of empire... I wonder if Europe has these idiots too, East Asia still has a long way to go

[@historyoftheworldpodcast5234]

Amazing work! Thank you!

[@korea2114]

좋은영상 감사합니다

[@금금-w3j]

오 아주 재밌게 봤습니다

[@지지파월]

우리는 현상에 머물지말고 큰꿈을 꿔야겠다

[@진도리-p9w]

진짜 잘 만들었네요. 감사합니다.

[@江山如画-u8m]

还挺有意思的，博主辛苦了👍🏻

[@Korean_JUN]

7:26 혹시 노래가 뭔지 알 수 있을까요

[@xzxzxzxz9892]

도라지 타령이라고 왼쪽아래 제목 나오네

[@Korean_JUN]

@@xzxzxzxz9892 감사합니다

[@rkfjfjdnxnzjajk]

발해때 고구려 지배층도 상당수 있었고 고구려 유민들도 많았던거로 아는데

[@vincentbj84]

great vidéo, great job, from france

[@tuongtang8974]

Korean history is fascinating. Share some bit similar to Vietnam history

[@hydradiscord1234]

Kênh này làm r

[@불루재이]

We would be great friend today if it wasn't for the 20th century

[@COVID-china]

맞아

[@triballianmapper]

13:31 Link of the song?

[@TheDragonHistorian]

gongu.copyright.or.kr/gongu/wrt/wrt/view.do?wrtSn=13300012&menuNo=200020

[@triballianmapper]

@@TheDragonHistorian Thanks a lot

[@레몬밤자몽]

행정구역 경계가 살짝 아쉬운 점 빼고는 완벽한 영상

[@seoul_9584]

영상 기대하고 있겠습니다!!!

[@abcdmefgh2843]

I love your format! It really makes me want to do sth similar for my country.

[@kral16643]

I like your style

[@useerenas]

처음에 나온 브금 산도깨비네요 ㅋㅋㅋ

[@xmfhx6929]

You should give your sources. Like what historical atlases did you use. Etc.

[@BrakeCoach]

역사룡님 안녕하세요, 동영상 잘 봤습니다. 고려시대까지 한반도 해안선이 살짝 더 안쪽으로 들어가 있는 형태로 나오는데 혹시 그거에 대한 자료는 어디서 찾으셨나요? 아무리 찾아봐도 커뮤니티나 카페글이나 나무위키에 출처없이 인용만 되어있는거만 나와서 원본 자료는 어디서 나왔는지 한번 궁금합니다. 역사룡님이 반영하셨으면 어디서 정확한 자료를 찾으신것 같아서 한번 물어봐요.

[@TheDragonHistorian]

비교적 자료가 많은 그 당시 중국 해안선을 보면 큰 강에서의 퇴적물이 쌓이기 전이라 지금보다 해수면이 5-10m정도 높았다는 것을 확인할 수 있습니다. 안타깝게도 BrakeCoach님이 말씀하신 대로 한반도 해안선에 대한 자료는 별로 없어서, 사실 그냥 중국쪽 자료를 참고해 개인적으로 추측한 것에 가깝습니다 (floodmap.net이라는 사이트를 이용해 원하는 해수면을 입력하여 지도를 바꿔볼 수 있습니다). 또한 과거 김해만처럼 확실한 정보가 있는 경우나 강화도처럼 간척 기록이 있는 곳은 그 기록을 따랐습니다.

[@BrakeCoach]

@@TheDragonHistorian 아하 알겠습니다. 제가 지금 원삼국시대 지도를 제작하고 있는데 해안선 자료를 뭐를 써야할지 몰라서 물어봤습니다. 답변 감사합니다!

[@kinkin7194]

so weird, Jin Dynasty (Jurchen), Song (Chinese), Ming (Chinese), Qing (Jurchen) disappeared, but Han, Tang, Liao and Yuen were shown in this video. Why?

[@HistoryGark]

Han : Destroys Gojoseon. Tang : Destroys Baekje and Goguryeo Liao : Destroys Balhae and war with goryeo Yuan : Made Goryeo a vassal state. Jurchens : It is incorporated into this Song : War with yuan Ming : A country where King Sejong's 4 armies and 6 bases were originally located in one place. Qing : Manchu War(ByungJa war)

[@kinkin7194]

@@HistoryGark don't understand what you mean

[@HistoryGark]

It means that many foreign dynasties emerged for that reason​@@kinkin7194

[@레몬밤자몽]

It only shows countries that were in war with korean countries

[@muchsoso8468]

@@kinkin7194 song ming qing didnt do much about defining korean territory.

[@rkfjfjdnxnzjajk]

또 임진왜란 당시에 일본군은 세계에서 강력한 군대들 중 하나였고 전근대에 유래가 없는 27만병력을 통한 해상 원정이었는데 그걸 막아낸게 조선임 또 조선은 여진을 우습게 본 적이 없음 그러니까 주기적으로 예방전쟁으로 여진족들을 대대적으로 토벌했지

[@aleksandarvil5718]

Korea post -1945 : **Divided into Two States* Its Three Kingdoms and tribal confederations : *_“ArE wE a jOkE tO yoU ?!??”_*

[@Bimillian]

다음에 또 진짜 최종판(?)을 내신다면 다음 부분도 반영 검토 부탁 드립니다. 1. 조선은 갑오개혁 후 고종의 칭호가 잠시 '대조선국 대군주'(호칭은 주상 전하에서 대군주 폐하로 변경)로 바뀝니다. 한자문화권에서 '왕'이 주로 제후의 칭호로 인식되었다 보니, 그걸 탈피해서 서양의 king과 같은 독립 군주임을 강조하기 위해 대군주라는 별도 칭호를 고안해 냈다가(조선의 외교 문서에서 서양 국가의 king도 대군주로 일괄 번역함) 나중에 대한제국 황제가 되면서 폐지됩니다. 이 부분이 영상에 반영이 안 돼 있어서 만약 개정판을 만드신다면 반영 요청 드립니다. 2. 세종 당시 ㅐㅔㅚㅟㅢㆎ는 전부 하강 이중모음이어서 앞의 모음(ㅏㅓㅗㅜㅡㆍ)이 음절 핵이 되고 ㅣ가 반모음(semivowel)으로 딸린 음소가 됩니다. 따라서 당시의 '귁'은 'gwik'(ㅜ가 반모음 + ㅣ가 음절 핵)보다는 굳이 따지자면 'gooyk'(ㅜ가 음절 핵 + ㅣ가 반모음) 정도에 더 가까운 발음입니다. 이 부분도 영상 수정 시 반영 검토 부탁 드립니다.

[@jamesdakrn]

19:19 딱 상해 임시정부가 세워진 해에 들어오는 애국가 타이밍 미쳤다

[@주환-p6h]

타임라인도1919

[@HistoryGark]

영상에서 당나라의 영토중 Xi people은 한국어로 서인(西人?)이라고 표기 하나요?

[@TheDragonHistorian]

해족(奚族)입니다. 본래 고막해(庫莫奚)였는데 당나라 기록에서부턴 그냥 해라고만 나옵니다.

[@HistoryGark]

@@TheDragonHistorian 감사합니다

[@Seogok]

거의 이정도면 대학교 역사 세미나 수준이노..

[@howtobasichtb]

🇰🇷 지도로 배우는 한국의 미래 역사도 만들어주세요 (2024~3024년으로요)

[@matthewmann8969]

One long charted lister

[@se6369]

Can you disable the logo us mobile users get in the corner with the KZbin app? It's blocking the text, and the subtitles are blocking the map...

[@Labazan729]

The Joseon state existed for 500 years, it is one of the longest-ruling states in history, and all these years this state owned the entire Korean Peninsula and at the same time its borders practically did not change

[@Wandrative]

It was the second shortest ruling state out of all the proper central-government states that existed in Korea. Silla and Gojoseon lasted some 1000 years, Goguryeo and Beakje lasted some 700 years, Goryeo for some 500. So what is encouraging you to say that Joseon was the longest ruling?

[@부여볼]

(남옥저와 임둔 지방에 있었던)동예는 임둔군이 철폐된 서기전 82년에 자립한 것으로 알고 있는데 영상에서는 서기후에 자취를 들어내네요. 그 이유를 알 수 있을까요.

[@TheDragonHistorian]

임둔군은 서기전 82년에 철폐되었지만 완전히 철수한 것이 아니라 '동부도위'라고 해서 낙랑군에 편입되었습니다. 옛 임둔군 속현들이 완전히 폐지되어 옥저, 동예 등에 넘어간 것은 서기 30년 왕조(王調)의 반란이 광무제에 의해 진압된 이후입니다.

[@yujiang6004]

Great and excellent video!👏❤ Would you like to remake the video about Chinese history in this way, just like some ties between Korea and other countries shown in this video? I expect a new version of Chinese history with close relationship between China and neighbouring ancient and modern states. You can try to produce this if you have free time, thank you very much! 😊

[@TheDragonHistorian]

Thanks! I am planning to do a remake of the China video within the next year, but it'll be split into at least 3 parts.

[@yujiang6004]

@@TheDragonHistorian Thx for your reply, I'm looking forward to this masterpiece! Happy Korean national foundation day!

[@yyyymmddhhmm]

@@yujiang6004 That would be pretty cool. The Influx of Chinese immigrants into the Korean states has long been a thing noted in historical texts. Beginning with Qin (秦) and Han (漢) refugees fleeing to Jinhan (辰韓), Northern Yan (北燕) refugees emigrating to Goguryeo during King Jangsu's conquests, and hundreds of thousands of Ming (明) elites and soldiers settling in Joseon Korea (朝鮮) of whom their Korean descendants make up a considerable portion up to the time. Meanwhile, Koreans from Goguryeo and Baekje, and especially Silla (who actually build the first Korea Towns known as Sillabang everywhere on the shorelines of Tang), settled in China too. It would be cool to see these events noted throughout.

[@yujiang6004]

@@yyyymmddhhmm I never learn about these historical knowledge before you tell me. Thx for your addition.

[@yyyymmddhhmm]

@@yujiang6004 Being Korean myself, I'm also an advocate of your idea where I can see cultural, historical exchanges and ties between neighbouring states. As far as I know, Koreans like me would have something called the Jokbo, the family book, where we can track our ancestors both maternal and paternal. My ancestors mainly come from Goguryeo and Silla, but I've also happened to find that some of my ancestors from the female line were Chinese emigreés from the Song and Ming Dynasty.

[@polluxxxx399]

Hi Dragon Historian! Could you maybe do a video about the Uralic languages?

[@muscularbunny131]

무신정권 최씨 사람들의 공작 후작 작위도 잘 나와 있고, 대왕이 단순히 위대한 왕을 높여 부르는 표현이 아니라 고려와 조선의 정식 군주 명칭이었음도 잘 나와 있네요.

[@소통이먹통되다]

8:15 오른쪽 도표에서 나라 표기를 실수하신 것 같습니다. 장수왕이나 연개소문 등은 다 고구려의 왕들인데 나라의 이름이 고려로 바뀌었네요..

[@이리가수미]

5세기부터 고구려의 정식 국호는 고려입니다.

[@Antitititi316]

이건 한국사 시간에 배우지 않아서 문제야 진짜..

[@muchsoso8468]

고구려 시대에 이미 다 고려라고 불렀어요. 그시절 중국 역사책에도 다 고려라고 적지 고구려 이름은 이미 그때부터 옛날 이름. 주몽의 고구려도 고려, 발해도 고려, 궁예의 후고구려도 고려, 왕건의 고려도 고려임. 우리나라 역사는 조선-고려-남북국(고려/신라)-고려-조선임.

[@한준-h6y]

단군오신날은 역사룡과 함께

[@greatjoseon]

18:38 Does anyone have the link to the song here?

[@gpt_rule_the_world]

"그리움" by 심연주(Simyounjoo)

[@gpt_rule_the_world]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nIGmo3WMbtCXiqssi=H8Rf1F4sCMomPuWc

[@nini_ui]

고구려랑 발해!!🇰🇷

[@diyarharki4877]

Why is the old city of Yudong not in Korea now?

[@ChinaJapanLover]

Because korea likes to steal

[@seoul_9584]

혹시 조선이 1882년부터 1894년까지 청나라로부터 직간접적인 간섭을 받았다는거 표현하셨나요? 외국인들이 자꾸 헤깔려하던데. 1882년 이전에는 독립을 누렸고 그 이후 청의 간섭을 받았다는거 분리시켜야 할듯.

[@화이팅-t2q]

병자호란 이후로는 청나라에 개기지 않는 이상 직접적으로 지배하려고 하진 않았지만 류큐가 일본에 합병당하자 위기감을 느끼고 임오군란을 진압한 겸 아예 조선을 직접적으로 지배하고자 조청상민수륙무역장정을 채결시킵니다. 그때부터 원세개가 청국공사로 상주하며 직접적인 간섭을 받아왔고 이는 청일전쟁 때 갑오개혁으로 인해 청나라를 향한 조공을 폐지되며 끊어집니다. After the Manchu invasion of Korea, Qing dynasty let the Koreans be so long as they didn't rise up against the Manchus. However, with the annexation of Ryukyu by the Japanese, Qing felt threatened and forced the Koreans to conclude Qing-Joseon commercial treaty on its way to put down a military revolt in Korea. Ever since then, Qing dynasty deeply meddled in Korean affairs with Yuan Shikai being present in Korea as a diplomat. This ended due to the abolishment of tribute to Qing by Gabo reform during the Qing-Japanese war.

[@화이팅-t2q]

물론 그 이전에도 병자호란때 신하의 예를 행하며 사실상 청의 속국이였죠. 직접적인 간섭만 안받았을 뿐.

[@seoul_9584]

@@화이팅-t2q 옛 동아시아에서는 조공무역이 현대로 치면 국가 간의 공식적으로 공인된 무역이었고, 조공책봉이 중국과 공식적으로 외교관계를 맺는 방식이었습니다. 중국의 조공책봉을 안받은 일본은 현재로 따지면 중국과 미수교국이었고 중국은 일본과의 무역을 금지하여 일본은 중국과 무역하려면 밀무역을 하거나 류큐에서 중개무역으로 하는 방법 밖엔 없었습니다. 그리고 병자호란은 청나라가 조선에게 청나라를 중국으로 인정할 것을 요구하기 위해 침략해서 일어난 전쟁이었습니다. 삼전도의 굴욕은 전쟁 패배에 따른 항복이었지 현대의 개념인 타국의 간섭과 지배를 받는 종속국이 된다는 그런거 아니였습니다.

[@seoul_9584]

@@화이팅-t2q 중국의 조공 시스템은 외국과 여러 중국 왕조 간의 무역과 철학적 관계에 기초한 상징적인 유교 세계 질서였습니다. 지배시스템이 아니라 옛날에 동아시아 국가들 간의 공식적인 외교 관계를 수립하는 방법이었습니다.

[@seoul_9584]

@@화이팅-t2q 현대인의 눈으로 바라보지 말고 그 당시 사람의 눈으로 바라보세요. 주권 개념과 동등한 관계는 19세기 쯤부터 서양의 영향으로 생겨난거고. 동아시아는 그런거와는 달리 국력에 따라 차등대우하는 방식었습니다. 그리고 이런건 굴욕적인게 아니라 그냥 외교방식이니 신하국을 자칭하는건 그냥 동아시아에서 흔히 이루어지던 외교적 시스템이었다 이렇게 보셔야 합니다.

[@asynn269]

근데 국가명을 번역할때 동예를 Eastern Ye로 할거면 고조선도 Old Joseon해야하는거 아닌가용?

[@christopherlee5156]

There is a wrong one = Sea of Japan X

[@blue-d4g]

솔직히 동해를 일본해라 부르는 게 왜 불편한지 모르겠음. 애초에 동해가 동쪽에 있는 나라가 한국밖에 없는데 전 세계한테 그걸 동해라 부르라 하는 건 너무 개소리 아님?

[@whisperer1705]

​@@Nohatedont동해 일본해 둘다 틀렸음 황해처럼 이름 바꿔야됨

[@현이1216]

​@@whisperer1705영국해협은 뭐가 돼요? 그냥 일본해가 맞아요 영국해협은 누가보면 해협의 영해가 모두 영국거라서 이름이 영국해협인것도 아닌데요 국제 명칭은 그냥 제일 많이 쓰는게 맞는겁니다 인도양도 영해가 전부가 인도건가요? 과거의 조선해니 뭐니 현재가 아니면 의미가 없습니다

[@辻薫-n3r]

韓国人ってこんなくだらないこと気にしなくちゃいけないのかー。 安心しろ。君たちには大韓海峡があるじゃないか！

[@유저123-z3p]

선생님 혹시 유목민족 돌궐 몽골등 만들어 주실수있나요?

[@물소추적-j6c]

예전에 만들어두신게 있어요

[@GaryHField]

I hope you can do a similar video with the Philippines. We have so many pre-colonial kingdoms before we were colonized by Spain, hahahahahahaha. There's Ba-i (currently Laguna province), Caboloan ( currently Pangasinan province), Kumintang (currently Batangas province), Kalauit (currently Cavite province), Ma-i (currently Mindoro island), Butuan (currently Northern Mindanao), Saomitoy (currently Ilocos region), Ibalong (currently Bicol Region), Namayan (currently Makati, Mandaluyong, Pasig and Santa Ana, Manila), Madya-as (Panay and Negros), Maguindanao (currently SOCCSKSARGEN), Maynila (currently the Walled City of Intramuros), Puliran Kasumuran (Bulacan), Sulu, Sugbu (currently Cebu), Tondo (Northern NCR), and many other satellite city states. It's quite difficult to map the Philippines before the colonial era because our local kingdoms and polities were never centralized.

[@gaberdo84]

do timor leste next

[@Tamerlane_]

🇲🇳❤️🇰🇷

[@user-rk1ic7rc9x]

Good detail

[@감자-z3s4b]

한반도는 자원도 없고 인구도 부족한 말그대로 아무것도 없는 황무지에 불가했습니다 그곳에 터전을 잡은 조상들 그리고 그땅을 지키기위해 싸워온 조상들과 독립 운동가와 유공자분들의 희생을 잊지 않을겁니다 앞으로도 한반도의 역사는 계속될것이고 지구가 끝나더라도 후손들에게 이 역사를 알려줬으면 좋겠습니다

[@kmondays]

ㄹㅇ 단군 할부지는 왜 하필 여기에.. 게다가 고조선은 그나마 비옥한 아랫쪽 지방도 못 먹었던데ㅋㅋㅋ

[@sungbinee8]

@@kmondays 단군은 요동 금싸라기에 똬리 틀었음 못지키고 반도로 내려온 후손이 문제지 왜 엄한사람 탓함

[@칸의장우산]

@@sungbinee8 이게 맞지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 석유도 나오고 만주 평야도 있어서 식량 자급자족도 가능한 만주에 떡하니 자리 잡아놨는데.. 단군 할배 저승에서 통곡 중 ㅋㅋㅋ

[@sungbinee8]

@@칸의장우산 고구려 시절까지 국경선으로 유지는 해왔는데 신라가 중국에 붙어먹은 바람에

[@칸의장우산]

@@sungbinee8 발해 때까지도 유지했음

[@cambodianpleasuresquad1753]

all east asians came from cambodia A 2021 study by Tagore et al. found that the proto-Austroasiatic speakers split from an Basal East Asian source population, native to Mainland Southeast Asia and Northeast India, which also gave rise to other East Asian-related populations, including Northeast Asians and Indigenous peoples of the Americas. " reference Tagore, Debashree; Aghakhanian, Farhang; Naidu, Rakesh; Phipps, Maude E.; Basu, Analabha (29 March 2021). "Insights into the demographic history of Asia from common ancestry and admixture in the genomic landscape of present-day Austroasiatic speakers". BMC Biology. 19 (1): 61

[@夜行者-s2x]

他們祖先的更像是源自云南-緬甸，大江大河，平原陸地（長江）附近

[@cambodianpleasuresquad1753]

@@夜行者-s2x and who was living in yunan and myanmar at the time? the austroasiatics. the wa people are an austro asiatic people native to yunan and myanmar

[@夜行者-s2x]

@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753 and who was living in yunan and myanmar at the time? 1，Ydna C1b+D1a+M-The first settlers/ aboriginal，Vietnam/Hoabinhian,Andamanese peoples，Melanesians 2，Ydna O1a+O1b+O2-The second group of settlers/Mongoloid Austronesian O1a/Austroasiatic O1b/Sino-Tibetan O2a MtDNA M与安达曼人有关 雲南緬甸人母語叫做漢藏語族-藏緬分支

[@cambodianpleasuresquad1753]

@@夜行者-s2x why does OLD chinese sound like the khmer language? listened to it and it has the same sounds as modern khmer. sounds totally different from modern chinese

[@夜行者-s2x]

@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753 可能高棉人祖先來自南中國，古代柬埔寨南部是海，東邊是海，西邊也是海，他們只能來自北方，不就是中國南方雲南緬甸

[@lilcantabile444]

영산강일대 복속 안 된 것까지 ㄷㄷ

[@somebodysomeone8685]

What's Dumaknu?

[@greatjoseon]

Think its a rump state of the Buyeo

[@읍읍-e7g]

정말 가슴이 웅장해진다

[@drswag0076]

Gojoseon is probably the first North Korean state before 1948.

[@muchsoso8468]

it was not particularly n . korean state. Old Joseon was the origin of the most of korea states, including Buyeo, Koguryo in the north and Mahan, Shilla in the south.

[@xncnx-w1v]

Gojoseon is not just North Korea's history

[@seoul_9584]

모르는 사람은 초반에 외세와 한국계 국가 사이 구별이 어려울듯. 마한,변한,진한,가야,진국,옥저 등 소국들이 한국계인지 외세인지

[@OrionAlpha]

지금이야 구분을 하지만 당시에 의미가 있었을까요?

[@blue-d4g]

초반 부분에서 한국계라는 개념이 존재했을까요? 그냥 독립적이었던 여러 나라의 민족이 합쳐지면서 우리 민족이 형성된 것 같네요

[@황진석-m3x]

@@blue-d4g같네요가 아니라 맞아요 세계어디든 한나라에 원래주터 하나의 민족이었던 나라가 있기나 할까요

[@YT_KF-21]

한국 교과서에는 동해라고 적혀있지만 외국 교과서 대부분은 sea of japan이라고 적혀있습니다 저런거 보면 마름이 착잡해지네요..

[@nijigirl]

한국 입장에서나 동해죠 뭐 한국식 표기 강요하는것도 이상함 ㅋㅋㅋ

[@9wyshsiwj]

​@@nijigirl 표기문제는 해외에도 있어서 한국인만 유난인건 아니죠. 근데 저도 별생각 없긴함

[@winniekuma4542]

KR means korea? I was a little excited when I thought it is Kaiserreich

[@chocolate-in-the-moon]

20분 뚝딱

[@곧뜰채널]

삼국시대 이후 급격히 노잼 되는 한국사...

[@IKBODDER_13229]

Videos complete

[@lutho7693]

Love Korea from South Africa 🇿🇦 ❤️ 🇰🇵

[@yutolee-k8s]

Actually, South Korea should be South Korea and North Korea should be North Korea.

[@김동현-d7m]

That is north korea flag

[@호에엥-q4q]

bruh

[@GL-iv4rw]

BASED

[@dirckthedork-knight1201]

So basically in a way the Han invading Korea basically reversed all the social progress the kingdoms had done during that point

[@JENJREQWNJEQ]

推翻😂

[@まうざぁ-j9y]

다 좋습니다만 왜 고조선의 두번째 중심지가 선양 인근인가요? 사기색은등 여러 기록을 보면(사실 기록마다 다르긴 합니다만..) 험독현에 있다했는데 험독현으로 비정 되는 곳은 지금의 잉커우시 인근 아닌가요

[@한준-h6y]

고고학이 먼저입니다

[@hiswieder9398]

교차 검증 확실히 안되는 사료보다 고고학이 더 정확하지

[@persianballofficials-IR]

Please do history of iran

[@UbermanNullist]

In history, Real China has invaded Korea only once. In 108 BCE, the Han Dynasty invaded parts of northern Gojoseon. After that, for 1500 years, We had wars with our cousins Mongol & Jurchen only but no Chinese here. These Wars between nomad brothers are historically very common thing and It was the process used to determine the hierarchy between brothers. The Tang Dynasty was a Mongol nation. The Tang dynasty was founded by the Xianbei people, who were Sino-Mongolia. Their blood was pure Mongols, but they learned Chinese language to rule the Chinese.

[@yujiang6004]

If Tang was Mongolic, Thailand should also be regarded as a Chinese nation and Britain should be German😅

[@yujiang6004]

Also, most of Jurchens have never been nomadic

[@UbermanNullist]

@@yujiang6004 Don't you remember? Emperor Xiaowen implemented a policy of sinicization? This is an official historical fact. They speak Chinese but blood was Mongolian. The Mongols actively implemented the policy of sinicization from Wei to Tang era. However, Mongolians believe that this was the failure of the Tang dynasty. Later, the Yuan, Jin, and Qing dynasties treated Han Chinese as second-class citizens.

[@UbermanNullist]

@@yujiang6004 the Jurchen, to be precise, are a half-nomad tribe. They settled and farmed, but also had a nomad life. They were horsemen who frequently interacted with the Mongols. Their writing system is very similar to the Mongolian script.

[@TheDragonHistorian]

The Xianbei were not Mongols; it's the other way around, if anything. The Mongols originated as a subgroup of the Shiwei, who themselves were a subgroup of the Xianbei. There's also a good chance that the Tuoba spoke a Turkic language. However, their identity was pretty much Chinese by the late Northern Wei dynasty. Also, it's the Manchu alphabet that was based on the Mongolian script. The Jurchen script was based on Chinese characters, via the Khitan script (the Khitans were not Mongols, either).