“The Human Race vs Races of Humans: Facts and Fantasies about Genes and Evolution”

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

I am from Southern Africa but Kenya has always produced good intellectuals and philosophical minds- Big up!

[@straighttalking2090]

Maybe by African standards but not top world intellectuality; the Galileos, Einsteins and Newtons.

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

@@straighttalking2090 actually i wasnt saying anything about the world, i was simply talking about Kenyan intellectuals Im not sure why you feel such a need to put down African intellectualls anyway Is that what you are about You are one of those us and them people who love division and darkness i see Keep that darkness and evil heart to yourself and leave the rest of us alone please

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

@@straighttalking2090 you are clearly in the grips of the evil one He is using you but nonetheless none of us is beyond redemption. This coming Sunday consider taking a walk down to your nearest church, and going up and kneeling at the alter and asking for the pastor to lay hands on you and pray for your heart and soul, Sincerely you will find you will be freed!

[@straighttalking2090]

@@elainerekopantswe2933 Ah, so you were just talking about African intellectuals? Why didn't you say so. In this woke age of fake black history I feel obliged to chivy at every instance of untruth.

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

@@straighttalking2090 as I said what you need is divine intervention. I was not talking about African intellectuals I wasn't comparing any intellectuals based on race That is your issue nd you are the one who is obsessed with race and bringing other races down so don't make it mine. Make that visit to church this coming Sunday you need some quality time with your pastor

[@JD-bk4zi]

"If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." Great way to end the lecture.

[@AfroPick82]

It's just interesting how we have this whole Recessive & Dominant genes dynamic. While ppl overlook the basic fact that its bc the Recessive genes came out of the Dominant genes.

[@CrowdPleeza]

At 11:42 There are only more Black men in prison than in college if you're counting all Black men in prison regardless of their age. The majority of Black men of college age(18-23)are not in prison.

[@zoeslime2872]

College has no age limit so therefore this comment is irrelevant sorry

[@classiql]

Thank Ghod for this brother telling humanity story from our point of view. Ghod keep him and bless him

[@shivangityagi1560]

Lmao i just tried to correct some people on this term but instead of praising they called me racist.

[@vagrant-techart8278]

This is Amurica :v

[@bt9803]

Most people are too brainwashed and self centered to think critically or without bias. That was by design to turn everyone against the true enemy of the self proclaimed “chosen ones” who want to enslave us all.... again. They’ve orchestrated MANY great resets, population genocides, erased / rewrote history destroying many cultures, languages and people. Take a peoples history & culture and they are easier to control. Sneaky devils. Everything is backwards. We’re in the upside down.

[@0-Templar-0]

@@bt9803 Hello, based department?

[@phumlanimbabela-thesocialc3285]

Great lecture. I really enjoyed it.

[@stevoelchulo8258]

I honor the knowledge but it seem like he was scared to say the truth man spit that shit like twista

[@rileystevens8188]

Horrifying lack of understanding in this comment section. Skin color does not determine genetic heritage, despite our categorization of "races" based on skin color. That is this man's entire argument. People are grouped by race FIRST, and that's the problem. Two people with black skin can be demostrably shown to have less shared genetics than a black person and a white person or any other "race". They're not a race, or group or really share any physical commonality beyond skin tone and skin tone does not determine shared genetics. They look the same. LOOK the same.

[@c4call]

Race is not based solely or even predominantly on skin color. People who think race or racism is "only skin deep" know nothing of history or biology. Different ethnic groups and different races literally have different bone densities, skull structures, forearm and shin length, toe and finger length, body mass indexes, proclivities toward diseases, etc. Hell, even skin color itself isn't just some incidental genetic drift... Lighter skin tone literally became 100% dominant in landmasses furthest from the equator, like Europe, because that lower level of melanin, AND OTHER DIFFERENCES IN SKIN COMPOSITION, permit for a much more efficient utilization of sunlight for the production of vitamin D and Testosterone. People with very dark skin living in northern climates literally have to take pills to avoid serious illnesses caused by the lack of sunlight hitting their skin.......

[@rileystevens8188]

@@c4call Race is entirely based on skin color or eye shape. All across the world, people have historically been segregated based on appearance. Apartheid and the southern United States did not differentiate between black africans or black Aborigines. If you were black, or even brown, you lived and worked in segregated areas. There were no laws about ancestry or biology. The distinction was between whites and non-whites.

[@ElselchoGaming]

@@rileystevens8188 What about skull measurements, overall height differences, IQ differences. Those are deeper than the skin.

[@hozerberto4886]

@Sephiroth Hojo how about the best 100m sprinters on the world being west African descendants and all world strongest man winner being north European descendants

[@ElselchoGaming]

@Sephiroth Hojo Yes and I'm sure that scientists deemed Gender Dysphoria as no longer a mental illness because of some ground breaking study and not because of the overwhelming social pressure... gee whiz.

[@marvinratchford7913]

Darwin changed EVERYTHING! Since then true understanding of life itself.

[@stealthsadhu306]

Point 1- He repeatedly says Rushton claims you can predict individual characteristics solely from one's race. Rushton in fact and throughout his work stresses the opposite- that these genetic qualities are normally distributed (bell curve) throughout populations, and should never be used to assume anything about any individual. Are we supposed to believe he doesn't know that? Point 2- See how blithely he dismisses the point about the ease of fact-checking the startling twins statistic (32:14). If we started to do that, these bogus racialized claims would never end! No need to establish the truth in any of these matters, because see how these "truths" have been twisted in the past. Such is how ideology corrupts critical thinking. I urge readers to check how Rushton's work is sourced and decide for yourselves. That is, if the veracity of that chart even matters. I think it does.

[@NanakiRowan]

Rushton's "work" has been dumped on by the academic community after analysis revealed that his methodology was flawed, unethical, dishonest, and based on an agenda. No researcher or intelligent person would take his pseudoscience seriously.

[@oldspammer]

15:45 Random sampling is still done against the general population and does NOT rule out what the woman had asked. The woman asked an intelligent, well-thought-out question with scenarios, but was answered with implicit Marxism racist dogma from the lecturing professor. Search engine politics matter. When you search using a non-woke search engine, you get closer to the truth than when it is framed by Wokeness. This professor says some ridiculous stuff in regard to this "random sampling." As such I begin questioning his motives for everything that he is reporting if he does not even realize basic things about sample space theory.

[@danthemansmith6095]

Isn’t there a different haplo group out of Asia? There are so-called black peoples who originated in Asia and not Africa.

[@noidols00]

Afro Asiatics Phoenician I believe the Root defention of Shemtic are Derived from those people thus also proving Jews were Black

[@kudjoeadkins-battle2502]

No they just live in Asia. Like everyone else they come from Africa as well.

[@amberthomas6683]

THANK YOU I WAS RIGHT

[@marvinratchford7913]

@32:34 you can refute the data one at a time, endlessly, but it is not necessary to do that. The fundamentals are: variation is real, there are no ideals.

[@anthonynichols8702]

Keep social engineering discrimination racism poor opportunity etc... Let a panel of black folks write the questions Then read the results

[@straighttalking2090]

So _we_ have to *"let''* black folks do stuff? Are you implying they don't have the volition to do things for themselves?

[@JD-bk4zi]

Doesn't the criminality and incarceration rates have more to do with Social economic situation rather than skin color? Of a person with money get caught smoking weed he will have the money for bail and therefore not go to jail. For someone with little to no money, he doesn't have enough to pay the bail. The black community had a terrible history here in the U.S with consequences that they are still victims of, and the system is not there to help them but to make them dependent on the system itself.

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

The social economic situation is unrelated to skin colour or race?

[@JD-bk4zi]

@@elainerekopantswe2933 crazy, right ?

[@elainerekopantswe2933]

@@JD-bk4zi that was a question You are saying one is unrelated to the other...?

[@fondoftheduh]

It's the rap music culture misleading the youth.

[@dramese]

Or the person will not be caught at all because they are not perceived as such. I’ve been bless to be friends so many friends people from different walk of life, I myself come from a very poor background, although no one can hardly tell this and I don’t talk about my background if I had to to, I always lies about my family background, and since by the look I do look I appears like I’m from a well to do background. This allows me to blend with upper class groups very easily. I can assure you people from the upperclass or rich do a lot more drug than poor people, I’m talking about (white peoples).

[@calmryze]

Quite a long video, but It's really good, congrats!

[@ozark8043]

There are absolutely differences between the races, and none of us should be denied our literal identity. One issue I have is the constant claim of active oppression by one group against another using cherry picked data without acknowledging culture, one of the greatest predictive factors.

[@skp8748]

How many races are there then?

[@ernestmwape]

Seriously? I saw some octagerian almost having an heart attack during during Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Mrs Kenji Brown in 2022. Is that a gud indicator who is likely to commit mass murder?

[@melvie2566]

The different races evolved outside of Africa and that is why Africans are still evolving

[@skp8748]

🤣🤣

[@kudjoeadkins-battle2502]

Evolving into what?

[@kudjoeadkins-battle2502]

Africans would be the most evolved if such a thing is a thing.

[@christopherrobinson9690]

The type of people attracted to leadership these days are the nasty ones. Well that’s what it seems. I’m sure all start with the best intentions but get caught up in the political mess that is the problem in the first place and they lose their vision for the little person. The system makes it hard to make changes and when you do it cost you everything!!

[@hakeenshabazz6664]

This brotha was very sharp I really enjoyed the lecture.

[@awesomepumashoes]

Is he your “brotha” because he is black?

[@hakeenshabazz6664]

@@awesomepumashoes what a dumb ass question

[@godrikvoorhees]

@@hakeenshabazz6664 can I be your "brotha" Too?

Love the manner in which you promptly addressed the stupid questions. On point.

[@stevencorrea6946]

@@hakeenshabazz6664 well I thought the African and African-American was the same I'm learning very different the people you call Native American. Are actually Asian people I'm constantly learning. Frog and the toad can look very similar are they the same species?

[@gaylecheung3087]

No, I was talking about humans he was talk about animals creatures is a type of evolution

[@santoud]

The Doc says that there is variety in nature, than he says that the variety in humans is explained by human constructs (afirmation) ... so is there or not any natural variety between humans or is it all just our imagination? If theory of evolution is right than there is genetic and phenotypical variety amongst humans, no? If the theory of evolution doesn’t apply to humans than we are the exception. I understand that ideas on race are constructed by humans, but saying that there is no amount of variety in human biology that explains some of the differences seems to be absurd, it dismisses the theory of evolution as beeing false … Another problem: the examples that you showed are USA examples, thus a majority “white” country. That we observe that people prefer those that look alike is just an in-group bias that we see in all countries in the world. Chinese people have Chinese beauty standard, as do Japanese with Japanese standard and Nigerian people with Nigerian beauty standard. This only demonstrates that there is an in-group preferablity and bias that we already knew existed in all humans. It was not so interesting, a bit disappointed that the arguments of Doctor Nengo were not so well researched, too much confirmation bias perhaps.

[@RBEmpathy]

I don't think he was saying variation doesn't exist at all. I think he point was that, genetically, we can't really justify the use of the term 'race'. Also, what 'differences' are you talking about? Are you one of those race realists who assert that IQ test gaps and physical performance gaps and crime statistics all arise from genetic variance? Because that's absurd.

[@santoud]

@@RBEmpathy Well I hope I am wrong. I'm just suspicious because American anthropology is moste of time very ideologically oriented and as he seems to discard proof for differences in human population, it was pointing to me to some kind of ideological bias. Let alone the confirmation bias on the data for black arrestation in the USA without using other data that can explain better, like criminality rate in the black community, a multivariable analysis would certainly be more nuance than juste a binary one and would show different interactions with different corolations. Well known data withholding that contradicts his thesis or give more nuance to the problem doesn't help his case. Americans still invening stupid stuff in the field of anthropology, what is race realist now ? I only care about data and proof, the scientific method is my mantra. If the data goes against my belief system, than I should change my belief system. But with new data and more research we can see that evolution applys to humans too, and even though we have complex social interaction (culture, tradition, ideology, etc) that doesn't make us less animals on the contrary. There's clearly human variations, there is no denying it. Does it count for some differences that we observe, absolutely ! How much ? We don't know ... more research is needed. What we don't need is ideology stopping our researchers doing their job because of wrong think. Anthropology will always be a hot topic, because it sees humans as animals and nothing more. People think that they are special and that natural deterministic laws don't apply on them. Well science says they do ... even today my ego is fighting this truth, and it realy pains me to say it.

[@laughingachilles]

@@RBEmpathy Then the doc needs to speak to more geneticists because we can determine a great deal about race from genetic samples. Why do you think a persons race is a part of the organ donor criteria? It's because there is more likely to be a match between two people of the same race than two people of different races. We can track different haplogroups to show how humans migrated out of Africa. We can identify hybridization between denosovians, neanderthals and humans and how certain groups possess more contributions from these species than others. As for race realism, I must admit I'm very much on the fence regarding IQ as I have read papers from both sides which seem to contradict one another. What I would say is that the people who simply throw the argument away are often doing so out of an emotional reaction to the idea and not a scientific one. For example you mentioned that physical performance between races isn't based on genes. Well I'm sorry but that demonstrates a gross ignorance of the science. Why do you think nearly all of the Olympic sprinters are black? It's because there is a difference in fast and slow twitch muscle fiber which is genetic and varies between races. Why do you think east Asian people are often unable to tolerate alcohol to the same level as Europeans? It's because of a genetic difference which resulted from adaptation. Why do you think sickle cell disease was almost entirely limited to black people? It's because it is an adaptation against the parasite which causes malaria. Now as we can prove these differences I fail to see why intelligence would be exempt from genetic effects. Again I am not sure which side I land on at this point because of the contradictory studies, but to label the idea as absurd is simply not scientific. I'm a biologist (yes really) and I know many of my colleagues will say one thing in public and another in private in regards to this issue as it will immediately result in accusations of racism and the end of ones career. It's frustrating because science is supposed to be about evidence, but the history of science is studded with examples of emotion preventing good research.

[@RBEmpathy]

@Benedict Arnold lol fair enough. I deal with them a lot, my channel was dedicated to debunking race realism at one point, so I'm pretty polite to them, since being explicit about how I feel about them generally just ends the conversation.

[@RBEmpathy]

@Benedict Arnold thanks my man. Lol I may actually have to finish the videos I've been working on for a while. Hope you enjoy the content.

[@keithrezendes6913]

Why is he rubbing his solar plexus?

[@jackmorman8776]

I miss the old days man fuck

[@Nightek1]

There are obvious differences between races, it's statistical, highlighting differences isn't racist and has a noble purpose, for example decriminalize or increase the severity of sentences in according to the natural tendency of the various races, create custom study plans, etc.

[@theassassin9326]

@walker you do realise that humans came from africa and then migrate to the rest of the world. We black people are the origanal human white people came from black people that is a fact

[@shamtradtam3769]

@Sephiroth Hojo Race is a loose term. Take populations. If we take mitochondria and Y chromosomes, different populations have different mutations in varying percentages

[@straighttalking2090]

@Sephiroth Hojo If there are no races how can they "refute"?

[@straighttalking2090]

@@theassassin9326 So are you saying 'white people' evolved? Didn't 'black people'?

[@psychicspy]

Races do exist, though the lines between then have blurred in modern times. Genes can be traced back to the root ancestral groups. If a person expresses the phenotypes of a certain ancestral group, they are said to be of that race. No race is superior to any other. However environment does impact the different races in different ways. Whites have difficulties living in Africa. Blacks have difficulty living outside of Africa. The United States is a very racially diverse country. The disparity in outcomes that we see are largely the result of gene expression.

[@mts4428]

Now that we learned we are all just variations of humanity and not just our skin color, can we meet our cosmic cousins now. :)

[@ljsmooth69]

That's and to assume that it wouldn't be biased is unlogical why out of how many people were tested in these different ethnic backgrounds to how many other people were tested in a different ethnic background that there's a majority of one ethnic background more than the other being asked it cannot it's not an equal conclusion because it's not equally asked that say if we had 10 white people and three black people it's random but only three black people got asked out of 10 white people how do you think that outcomes going to come or say 30 Chinese to the 10 white people how do you think that outcomes going to come just because it's random doesn't mean it's equal then it doesn't mean it's right that's that's a fallacy of logic to even assume that so I wouldn't suggest this video that's necessarily wrong information but obviously is incorrect logically.

[@TheOasisProject1B8M]

The pride in the Brotha face at 3:39 is beautiful

[@rilluma]

there is one race, human race.

[@straighttalking2090]

@Abdel David Naa. not really - there's millions of them. But I wouldn't call them all idiots, most just confuse the common parlance use of the word race with the scientific one. And it's always worth remembering that fully half of the population are below average inteligence.

[@straighttalking2090]

@Abdel David You misread me - i'm talking of your "one" idiot.

[@straighttalking2090]

@Abdel David Sorry but you have - and I'm not sure who the "him", or "the batch" to whom you refer, is. If you are talking about rilluma's comment at the head of this column then I don't agree with him. Let's just leave it there eh.

[@emmanuelervin5035]

Human is a species not a race.

[@thirsty57]

@@mostro777 Homo sapiens*

[@oliverphippen1957]

The human race is all the people The individual races are how we climbed from the trees the ethnic groups / tribes are how we assembled in the caves based on our PREFERENCES We preferred not to be around stupid people We preferred to be around others that thought like us We preferred to be around people who got up off their ass We preferred people of our own liking We refused people who were not like us ??? and we still do ????

[@tiffanymbussiness]

Dumb ass comment lol

[@oliverphippen1957]

@@tiffanymbussiness if its so dumb then why do all experts agree ?????Its not in question ????

[@straighttalking2090]

You start off on the wrong foot. _We_ are a species. The tag ''human race" is just a phrase used in common parlance and not in scientific nomenclature.

[@oliverphippen1957]

@@straighttalking2090 if that is all you have you should have stayed at home - Apparently you agreed that we all came from the trees and congregated based on PREFERENCES - How is your tail bone ????

[@straighttalking2090]

@@oliverphippen1957 I 'agreed' to what..? Man you need to lay off the hash.

[@robgau2501]

Race is still just a game of semantics. We need to courageously study it. There are races. Race is real. But the important thing is that we are of the same species. We are related. We need to stop being so sensitive and just look at it. We're different but nobody is superior or inferior.

[@thuocquy_vn]

Ok, that's right.

[@ChowMeinWarrior]

Thank you very much!

[@CoolBreezeAnthony]

Shared.

[@luisaugustobonilha8210]

If we analyze the human genome we will see that we are one race, with small differences observed in the different population groups that make up the human species, and that the differences between individuals that are part of the human species/race are , biologically, a result of the most different processes of natural selection that have occurred on these groups throughout the world and times, and of course the cultural aspect - yes, the human is a cultural being - which reinforced these distinctive external (physical) characteristics, attributing to them a value judgment - good/bad, right/wrong, better/worse -. Brains, in this process, develop plasticity and different neurophysiological functions in these individuals, but they continue to be brains of the "homo sapiens" species and of course, it all depends on what you mean by "race".

[@straighttalking2090]

You say 'the human genome' as if there was but one, but every individual human genome is different. You say 'race' where in my vocabulary the word for that of which you speak is 'species'. I think the term race is a good-enough stand alone definition in general biology, just as the word green if fine in a general sub classification of colour, you may then want to sub classify 'green' to emerald etc (if you want to see an interesting link of the two topics in the English lexicon google _sub classify 'green'_ ). The world of DNA is almost infinitely more complex than the wavelengths of the visible spectrum. I think the difference of opinion in our use of 'race' is semantic. You speak in social sciences language - I speak biological. 'Race' is fine for any zoologist until you come to humans and then the word becomes taboo as if we are not subject to evolution. My thoughts are based on a lifelong interest in natural history. The word race is used in all of my field guides for the class birds, reptiles, mammals etc and down into the orders (and below) except for one order.. primates; in a beautiful identification tome I bought recently there was one species not listed in the index.. you may have already got it - humans. If you want to speak the language that speaks to the hard truth don't go with the social sciences.

[@luisaugustobonilha8210]

@@straighttalking2090 Thank you for your opinion, and what you say is just a confirmation of my opinion. The human species works and acts transforming culture into real biological barriers, so there is no way to talk about the concept of races without entering what you call the social sciences. Genome is by definition the genetic profile of a species, and in that sense, the human species - barring small group differences - is a single species. I do not discard the concept of race as a differentiating element of groups of the same species, I just understand that it is necessary to be correct in its interpretation. I do not understand race as a subspecies for the reason stated above, which is genuinely biological. This is so true that You can selected a handful of people in any corner of the world that you will have all the genetic variation of the human species preserved in that group. When it comes to race as a subspecies, there is a great risk of classifying it within social and cultural parameters, and ending up classifying them equally as better, worse, superior or inferior, based on cultural and not genuinely biological experiences, and that is the risk. Race is a useful attribute from a biological point of view to point out physical external differences resulting from selective pressures - yes I believe in evolution - and cultural ones too, because throughout the history of our species we have always wanted to "differentiate" from other groups - the multiplicity of languages ​​is nothing other than the need for "no" to be understood by the other group - and this, in my opinion, is where the danger of "races" and the risk of what you seem to call the "hard biological truth" lie , even more knowing that we can find more similarity in the genetic profile between a human and a chimpanzee than between two chimpanzees.

[@straighttalking2090]

field

[@straighttalking2090]

Ahh. I can hardly accept that the reply I wrote has been reduced to one word! I'll just quickly thank you for your thoughtful reply and say that I'm too tired to write it again now but I'll just do a quick cut and paste of something I think is salient until I can reply properly. This from David Reight - a highly respected leading geneticist on 'race': “I have deep sympathy for the concern that genetic discoveries could be misused to justify racism. But as a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among “races.”” Look forward to finding out more about your perspective, perhaps we can learn something from each other.

[@luisaugustobonilha8210]

@Sephiroth Hojo Genome is not genetic. In a very didactic way species has gene sequencing which is not to be confused with the genetics of the owners of a species. Genome is a kind of guide on how to make or how a species is made and the genetic code is the finished product within the standards and variations predicted by the way of making it.

[@Cityj0hn]

Incredible, he actually still believes in something we call Lewontins fallacy today.

[@JacobMueller]

As noted in the lecture the original study has been repeated using newer technology and newer processes for reading things like mitochondrial DNA. The fact is anyone who talks about the fallacy only talks about the original study and never talks about any of the follow up studies which have more thoroughly proved the point.

[@straighttalking2090]

@@JacobMueller ... and have even more recently been debunked. Lewontin's fallacy is what it says on the can.

[@nikolaiostropolsky8461]

29:19

[@ladidadiblondie]

Race is only a social construct. Every human on the earth relates to another in some way.

[@ladidadiblondie]

@PostHawk no there aren't. There's one human race, sure with variances, but we're not different races that doesn't biologically exist. You cannot tell skin color from DNA.

[@ladidadiblondie]

@PostHawk skin color is just melanin and those variances you speak of make up less than 5% of our total DNA, so it's not a big part of what makes us human. It's just our human DNA expressing itself differently. One solid species.

[@ladidadiblondie]

@PostHawk because of society, not biology. Doesnt change what makes us human so it should not separate us.

[@ladidadiblondie]

@PostHawk and there are several things wrong with what you said. There's been several studies that prove babies don't show biased based on skin color, and that it's taught to have those biases or to be racist.

[@ladidadiblondie]

@PostHawk well I only care for one truth: we're all part of humanity and all equal.

[@kryptachronacybertronian2489]

I dont understand how people dont innately know some of these things, Bless my mother soul, spiritually and biologically and the womderful excellent guiding genetics and presence of our Father and fathers, soulfully, spiritually and biologically. Its sad some the great lengths and methods some people have gone to cover the truth and dumb down the populace. Needless to say some people with a certain seemingly betond repair mindset will never get it. Where im from we were taught at a young age the "pale," as in so called "white man," was never the status quo. Being schooled for a short time in the Caribbean i came back to this land speaking three languages before 7, after so called being diagnosed w ADHD, their ritalin experiements and methodical diagnosisng and poisoning like some have undergone, ive nearly been reduced to a mindless fool. Its crazy how they can snatch one up using a system of legal terrorism simply because you were and always have been aware that we are not equal and likely never will be. They try to make people out to be extremists but fail to look in the mirror truthfully knowing the extreme lengths they go to, to cover up their acts of REAL TERRORISM and degeneracy. Whats sad is some of these would be posers teally have a degenerate mindset and heart and try to replace their void by stealing the substance of another, good thing some of us arent as dumb as we allow them to think. Cold world but Karma is Colder.

[@carlroberts4540]

How.many.D.NA.did.god.created.

[@SageVaughn]

How do you explain IQ differences in different races then?

[@thebalanceofgoddesssgods.1409]

Cultural conditioniong, vaccines, GMO and the person itself.

[@fernandovargasmejia740]

@Noble Thomas Environmentsal differences, overtime, result in different races. We've seen this happen time and time again in animals throughout biological history.

[@bigbluebuttonman1137]

IQ as an overall intelligence metric has been rejected by the very guy who created the idea. ...Keep that in mind.

[@nashnn7583]

How do YOU the increase in the overall IQ of the population ? I am open-minded to racial differences between humans, but I couldn't find a clear answer to that yet, but it seems to be the thug culture idk.

[@Seekerofknowledges]

How do you explain surviving in the savanna with no modern weapons ?

[@matthewmann8969]

Human is a species not a race they have there various root races, sub races, sub sub races, and mixed races

[@DaduaMaiga]

race is a social construct not biologically, since all living humans today are pretty much the same and belong to one specie which is Homo Sapiens, the oldest bones in Britain called "Cheddar Man" had dark skinned because humans evolved in Eastern Africa and migrated to different continents, Science estimated the pale skinned didn't evolved into modern humans till around 7000 years ago, When modern humans left Africa they encountered and interbreed with Neanderthals which is why Europeans have average of 2-3% of Neanderthal DNA, Homo Sapiens today are so genetically close to each other, out closet living relatives were chimpanzees because we last shared a common ancestor with chimps 7 million years ago, which lead to other hominids such as Australopithecus Afarensis the famous specimen known as "Lucy" which lived 3.2 million years ago in Eastern Africa and was the ancestors of all living humans today.

[@maxnithingale9783]

@@DaduaMaiga I understood you till the 'lucy' part c'mon...

[@liteney]

@@DaduaMaiga You're telling me that a dark skinned human made it to Britain during the iceage? You're out of your mind, and whatever scientist claimed that is a racist.

[@liteney]

@@DaduaMaiga Humans did not migrate out of Anatolia/Turkey into Europe because of the iceage. There was walls of ice and glaciers covering Europe, humans could not access Europe. Yet you claim that somehow a magical dark skinned human made it to Britain? Not just Europe which was covered in glaciers and walls of permafrost ice, but somehow he made it to Britain, which was under glaciers, mountains of ice. What did this magical dark skinned human do, take a jet to Britain? Insanity... pure insanity...

[@liteney]

@Sephiroth Hojo What's true? That a magical dark skinned human somehow lived under the ice?

[@kryptachronacybertronian2489]

Sometimes whats sadder is our relatives, seniors, ancestors in some cases think this information or presentation will change the nature and the once well hidden mindset and actions of "certain," groups. Ive learned through experience that some information until they realize how deep the structural racism is, can be potentially dangerous unless you are encompassing all the factors and have common sense to assess the real facts. The struggle isnt real, the haters, jealousy and racism is. Thats all. The orchestrated struggle here is just from petty people wanting to cowardly beat up on people they wouldnt dare say to their face even in a weak beat down state that they have a problem with you. If you got to use half your police friends to start ish and then run to the military to try and finish your setup, you are a coward and a true female. Oops i vented again!

[@ddh8624]

I don't even know what this means...what groups and what are they doing?

[@psychicspy]

Compare the environmental differences between the two continents while comparing the single standard difference between the light and dark cognative potential and the answer will be obvious.

[@skp8748]

So Koreans and Irish are the same race?

[@psychicspy]

@skp8748 Depends upon your definition of "Irish" or "Korean". It is possible to have Korean ancestors and yet be considered Irish or vice-versa. People like to refer to "the human race" which doesn't exist. All modern humans are members of the human species and within that species, there exist distinct groups of humans that share common physical traits. Those groups are commonly referred to as races although the group lines have become blurred by the movements and mixing of those populations in modern times.

[@skp8748]

@@psychicspy are Heung min Son and Declan Rice the same race? Simple is the average Korean and the average Irishman of the same race?

[@psychicspy]

@skp8748 Average? That would include people living in Ireland who may have been born Irish, but are genetically closer to people found in Asia. You are not asking the right questions.

[@skp8748]

@@psychicspy loool alright man clearly you don't want to have a good faith discussion

[@cisuris]

I think he’s jealous of the Neanderthal

[@nteemamuzandu7700]

But slim disease (HIV/AIDS) DID come from Africa.

[@burgerrburgerr3393]

No it came from a needle