The Hyundai Ioniq 6 is One of My FAVORITE EVs

[@KingTechHD]

Great review. I’ve had mine for 90 days and love it. I went w/ SEL AWD 20” rims and still get over 310 miles. Normal mode is perfect. Sport/Custom is FAST. I’m stopped twice a week by people who like it

[@TheNovakReport]

It's distinctive body style will definitely draw attention.

[@BigMaxGames]

Still love my I5 Ultimate with almost 100,000km

[@TheNovakReport]

I will like the Ioniq 5 a lot more just as soon as they add the rear wiper blade as part of the mid-cycle refresh. It's a great vehicle otherwise but winter driving without that wiper blade is a big no no for me.

[@xianshep]

Sigh. If only its trunk weren't so ridiculously small...

[@TheNovakReport]

Granted. Aerodynamics are a big part of this vehicle but so too for some is the ability to store more than a couple bags in the back.

[@xianshep]

@@TheNovakReport Yeah I get that function (trunk) follows form with regard to this vehicle, but apart from the lack of trunk space (a deal-breaker for me), I would just about call this the perfect car.

[@TheNovakReport]

@@xianshep It may not make a difference in your case, but there is also a small frunk area as well to offer a bit of an offset.

[@xianshep]

@@TheNovakReport Thanks. I drove the car and looked at it thoroughly so I know: Anyone who occasionally needs to haul multiple adults and their luggage needs to look elsewhere, unfortunately.

[@TheNovakReport]

@@xianshep sounds like Kia EV9 territory.

[@Drew-vz8fo]

Isn’t this vid 2 years late lol

[@TheNovakReport]

How so? The vehicles is still actively offered. I've done 2 other videos on the Ioniq 6 but this one just offers a more personal perspective.

[@IlIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlIlIlIlIlIIIII]

give the MPG equivalent you manlet apple

[@TheNovakReport]

Had you asked me nicely I might have obliged. But since you didn't, you lanklet lemon, you'll just have to look it up yourself.

[@IlIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlIlIlIlIlIIIII]

@@TheNovakReport you're obviously trying to avoid acknowledging that ICE engines even exist so you avoided making the comparison. This is what the Soviet brainwashed Canadian mind looks like.*EPA-estimated 140 MPGe combined rating, including 153 MPGe city and 127 MPGe highway.*

[@TheNovakReport]

@@IlIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlIlIlIlIlIIIII Wow...you're really reaching here. Let me put it to you this way, and I'll explain it slowly so you can try to understand logic...to understand MPGe or Le/100 KM, you also need to understand that a gallon or litre of gas is given an equivalent energy rating. BUT INSTEAD...you can also note the battery size in kW, understand how much energy an EV requires to travel 100 KM or 100 miles and then see for yourself that an EV that uses LESS energy for a set distance is more efficient. BTW, if you can spend so much time spewing petulant insults at someone because you don't like how they presented information, you ALSO can spend time going to fueleconomy.gov to find all that information yourself. Honestly...

[@Neojhun]

MPGe is not a useful number. It's not a good comparison to ICE vehicles, it's just a very rough guide line which heavily depends on many factors like energy source. Miles per kWh is way more useful when comparing EV efficiency. Before forcing people to just spam stuff, figure out what actually matters first.