The Judicial Consequences of Chevron [No. 86]

Did the Chevron decision have immediate consequences? Why is Chevron still controversial today, almost 40 years later? Professor Gary Lawson explains that the Supreme Court did not think they were issuing a groundbreaking precedent but lower courts quickly adapted the Chevron rules of deference to almost all cases involving administrative agencies. Courts now routinely defer to the agencies rather than carefully examining a statute and questioning the agency’s interpretation of it.
Professor Gary Lawson is the Philip S. Beck Professor at Boston University School of Law.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Subscribe to the series’ playlist: • Administrative Law [Co...
#no86 #law #administrativelaw #adminlaw #court #chevron

[@bigchopradio]

Who’s here in 2024?

[@bingeltube]

I am not sure the professor has explained the Chevron decision very well and its consequences

[@amanarun8265]

its the federalist society's channel bruh

[@bingeltube]

@@amanarun8265 It is all history now after the latest U.S. Supreme Court decision as of yesterday!

[@rusk3986]

@@bingeltube by the very same federalist Society judges, who are a part of the organization that made this video

[@josephdestaubin7426]

Chevron was and is an incorrectly decided disasir for freedom and individual rights. If Congress wants to curtail individual rights they need to be crystal clear about that curtailment.

[@jmorris9631]

Now it’s Conservatives’ turn to march through the institutions, suing everything in sight!! EPA, Dept of Edu, OSHA, IRS, and countless other unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats just lost their ability to pull laws out of their butts and then jail you for breaking said ‘laws’.

[@danglucksman4705]

Wonderful, concise summary of “Chevron!”

[@raymarchetta7551]

It was simply the easiest way that required the least amount of work

[@tyson211]

Judges will always look for ways to avoid deciding complicated cases. They don’t do much actual judging these days.

[@rickb06]

​@@tyson211yes, they do judicial activism nowadays, no actual constitutional validation.

[@jimolson9649]

When enforcing mere statutes judges of all courts do not act judicially and thus are not protected by qualified or limited immunity fact.

[@lorenzobeckmann3736]

the placard which says, "What is your job Judge"? --- quite apt. If only rubber stamp for Admin State (those not elected/executive fingeer puppets) then why bother with individual cases. One more case where Congress need write clearer laws. Same "experts" available to either Congress or Executive

[@jimolson9649]

Statutes strip the American people of their sovereign rights for statutes are the color of law not constitutional law and that's a fact.

[@legallycurated1796]

Cost of govt regulation is a major driver behind inflation and caused California cost of living to be untenable

[@jesselemaster512]

Hello from the future, they overturned it today. LOL.

[@zhesu8798]

here