The Largest Aircraft Ever Built In The World

The Largest Aircraft Ever Built In The World.
The time of unusual and legendary aircraft is running out irrevocably. The reason is computer simulation. Today developers know in advance whether the plane will fly or not.
In this video we will recall the days of pure engineering, when airplanes were created because of beautiful ideas and courage, or as a result of the insight of aircraft designers.
We present you the real Don Quixotes of the world aircraft industry - 10 largest aircraft in the world with the most interesting destiny.
#largest #planes #Biggest #Built
For copyright matters please contact us at:
[e-mail]

[@JohnJohn-yl4ko]

you know its Clickbait when you see the Arsenal Bird from Ace Combat 7

[@craigjohnson9791]

Why do you bait us with the flying wing to start the text then don’t show it

[@blobman1238]

Lmaoo yeah

[@stephenmeier4658]

People that do this should be banned

[@SGTPaul-0891]

Yep. I identified it immediately. 🤣

[@razgrizxlraviation9975]

I'm just here to see what kind of "awesome content" they will give us using Arsenal Bird as the thumbnail.

[@larrysorenson4789]

My dad, Colonel Richard H. Sorenson was a 17 year old first lieutenant and B-17 pilot. He led 57 missions and never lost a crewman. On a noteworthy sorte over Germany the plane was heavily damaged by flack after releasing the bombs. He fought the dying plane for 2-1/2 hours before landing at their base in Foggia Italy. No one could believe that the bomber had made it back. Half a wing, one engine and the upper tail were missing. The fuselage had a large percentage of it’s aluminum skin blown off. On the ground, the middle of the plane was resting on the ground and showed the effects of scraping on the ground in spite of the fact that the landing gesr was intact and was in the down position. He received a “Certificate of Valor for fighting to keep it in the air and bringing the crew back. These men were giants. After the war was over, dad found himself at a base near Miami, Florida. An officer asked him to go to the motor pool and get him a jeep. He respectfully declined the order. The officer asked him why and he replied: “I have never driven a car. I don’t know how to drive.” I miss him terribly.

[@GaryRowlands]

Thanks for his service.

[@electrichellion5946]

That’s unheard of today and even then not common, a young man of 17 years being a first Lieutenant and a pilot of multi engined aircraft. Looking back at my teen years there wasn’t a kid I knew that wouldn’t be trusted to operate or fly large commercial/military vehicles. Fast forward forty years and the maturity level of 2023 young adults is almost nonexistent and I might be able to trust one early to mid teenage kid to even operate a vehicle safely with adult supervision.

[@joseveintegenario-nisu1928]

@@electrichellion5946 From the Aviation achievements records, managing to land a heavily damaged airplane is a wonderful event. But you better consider every wasp action in Europe during WW I and WW II were to regret, to beg pardon, mercy, they built the strength of ussr, based in a genocide ideology, marxism-leninism, which killed, counting just those starving, around 100 million people. Yankee, stay at home! We don't need you, Mit brennender Sorge, non abbiamo bisogno. Blessings +

[@flywheel9759]

If the B-36 is not included in a list of the world's largest a/c the list is pretty bogus. Also, where is the Spruce Goose?

[@SkullHunter-fe7bf]

Where's the b-29

[@SlawcioD]

where is an-124? Where is Lockheed C-5 Galaxy? A-380? c-17 globemaster? Airbus A300-600ST Beluga? and so on...

[@kadenthompson6106]

YA

[@phantomechelon3628]

@@SlawcioD Coming in "The Largest Aircraft Ever Built 2" presumably?

[@markfurney3670]

Well people are saying because the Spruce Goose didn't fly it doesn't make it an aircraft but it did hover off the ground in the water

[@Fightre_Flighte]

As a channel that's supposed to be about aviation, you'd think the video titled "biggest aircraft in the world" would have the biggest aircraft in the world. But the list jumps EVERYWHERE. Going from downright MASSIVE with the first one (the name slips me) to the B-17?!? I'm pretty sure the B-52 threatened the size of it, but still was smaller. Then not even CHALLENGING the size until talking about Myria. Brings up a C-130 which is downright PILFY for a list about large aircraft, when they could be talking about the spruce goose, the C-17 globemaster, the 747 (especially if my suspicion about this being important aircraft), the A-380, and a solid number of others. TL;DR, I want my twelve minutes back. And NO, I'm not subscribing. I know this comment helps the algorithm, but this video tells me an important thing. This. Is not. A channel. For aviation fans. Maybe do some better research next time.

[@SamtheIrishexan]

It counts down to #1. I enjoyed it

[@SamtheIrishexan]

Maybe you should start your own channel

[@tanziks7301]

Honestly this video just wasted my time

[@Fightre_Flighte]

@@SamtheIrishexan Maybe I should.

[@Fightre_Flighte]

@@tanziks7301 Someone gets it. Thanks for relishing in agony with me.

[@pauldavis9387]

There are far too many errors in this list. I don’t even know where to start, but the C-130? Please give me a break. I worked on them. They are a medium sized plane at best.

[@EllAntares]

with 20,200 kg payload. THose seem to be lined up by ability to carry and reach out.

[@stevelindstedt8858]

Much of the graphics and narration on the Kalenin K=7 is bullshit.

[@Joesmith-fu4ps]

@@stevelindstedt8858 Who cares. This is entertainment for people like you who have nothing better to do.

[@johncunningham4820]

The B-52 and the C-130 are still both in service at well over 50 years , because no-one has built ANYTHING BETTER at their Job , so far .

[@stevelindstedt8858]

@@Joesmith-fu4ps I like accuracy in history . . . you just swallow whatever bile is just "made up" by idiot KZbinrs, and then you nurse hostility toward those who set the record straight.

[@daveharbour5418]

The B17 makes this list but the Lancaster is left out, now i know this a joke right.

[@PlayingWithFireOutdoors]

No starlifter, no globemaster.

[@chainedlightning]

No Galaxy.

[@acb9896]

A single copy. What exactly is a 'single copy'? So there's 2 ? Whoever translates these needs to have a American English editor.

[@henridegraaf2054]

@Rob Flh why ? The rest of the world uses metrics. Get used to it.

[@theiridiumgamer5225]

@Rob Flh No, no they don't.

[@justicar5]

@Rob Flh they need to use actual English and proper units, not American crap :p

[@aspiceronni4462]

To me a single copy built means 1 unit built, "copied" from the blueprints. But idk. I only made it through 2 years of engineering 18 years ago.

[@sternencolonel7328]

A plane so large that even the wings got their own wings ;)

[@davidentrot5644]

Most of these aren’t “large” planes.

[@lymansn]

No Howard Hughes H-4 Spruce Goose? 320 foot wingspan, 219 feet in length. It was the biggest Airplane for 70 years until the Northrop Grumman Stratolaunch Roc (2019). It is currently the largest airplane with a wingspan of 385 feet and a length of 238 feet. Neither of these Behemoths were mentioned.

[@justinhobart8747]

I was about to make the same comment I couldn't believe it as well no Spruce Goose... Wow

[@leosypher9993]

the video lacks many things, but most importantly it lacks basic research and a good general knowledge of the topic to start with.

[@survivortechharold6575]

people don't know shit about anything before yesterday, only think they do.

[@alaminnxt6281]

Bravo well done and I'm so glad today

[@ashfaq1999]

Classic Aircraft

[@pierrelaliberte3964]

My Father was a flight engineer on the C-130 Hercules during the Korean conflict and also the Vietnam War. He loved this aircraft and now he's 88 years old and has fond memories of it.

[@alpacas9]

Lets see, Korean war 1949-1953. First flight C130, 1954 . Please explain?

[@burtbacarach5034]

@@alpacas9 Time warp bro,time warp.

[@workablob]

My stepfather flew one in Vietnam. I have his flight suit.

[@Mbartel500]

Only the 225 should be on this list…the rest aren't even in the top 10…the c-130? Are you serious?

[@obelic71]

no C5, AN-124, 747, sproose goose etc. etc. the C-130 and TU-95 belong in the category long and still in operational service

[@felixfamularo6210]

Walter came back, "Center. We're showing a little closer to 2000."😁😁😁

[@Wargunsfan]

The Spruce Goose was left out. Those measurements would outstrip several of the aircraft on this list.

[@Entity_BlackRed777]

I LOVE the C-130 Hercules, all of them, but mostly the Allison T56 powered ones, because they can also be loud at over 20,000ft high!!!! Also, may even get one with special military permission!! (If that is even possible, that is.)

[@Celtic-Texan]

R.I.P. to the lone Antonov AN-225

[@user-cn3np1qh2p]

Нет слов, просто потрясающе

[@diegootero1686]

Lmao the PhlyDaily meme K7 video

[@someasiankid6214]

i pretty sure the biggest aircraft to fly was the hindenburg

[@micheal49]

At 245 meters overall length, it was certainly the longest.

[@Lycanion0]

I shall take your hindenburg, and raise you one USS Akron.

[@micheal49]

@@Lycanion0 IIRC, the Akron was just a taste smaller than Hindenburg. But the Akron wasn't a passenger liner, so there is that.

[@americannobody27]

I always thought the Spruce Goose was the largest ever built? You know, that insanely huge wooden thing Hugh's built!? Also, if you really planned on talking about bombers, then just say so! This had absolutely nothing to do with the title!

[@henridegraaf2054]

It was the largest seaplane built.

[@hairymoppins9659]

Largest wooden aircraft and wingspan

[@catis2cool455]

Actually, the largest plane ever built was the Antonov AN-225 Mriya. The largest wingspan belongs to the scaled composites stratolaunch.

[@hairymoppins9659]

@@catis2cool455 oh i forgot about the stratolauncher

[@theodorevegh6030]

The B-52 is the "Lion of the Sky." - TAV ♥️🇺🇸🌎👍

[@bottlestopper4353]

How’s that computer designed MAX engine nacelles working for ya.

[@RobertFay]

*- Early in its eventful life, the B-52 was given the affectionate nickname “BUFF,” which some say stands for Big Ugly Fat Fellow. The B-52's stunning longevity is matched or exceeded by its versatility.*

[@pietervaness3229]

BEAUTIFUL boat !

[@frankismydog]

That comentary though 🤣 “When it emerged from the clouds swinging its wings”

[@catjudo1]

I thought of the After Dark flying toasters when he said that. I hate it when videos show my age...

[@chapusa100]

I like your video, my faourite are the Antonov 225 and the Sea going Monster!!

[@Warrentheo]

Cutting in versions from video games that have naval battle cruiser turrets on them is a little much...

[@Thelivewire64]

Unfortunate ending for the AN 225. Hopefully rebuild/replacement will come soon! 😊

[@paulmoran217]

Right on.....I often wonder why the 225 was not moved out of the country; it was, after all, a certain target....the Russian invasion was weeks coming.

[@Zigblat]

The B-36 was the largest mass-produced piston-engined aircraft ever built. It had a wingspan of 70 meters (230 ft.). Extra jet engines were added for take-off and dash capability. It was bigger than the B-52.

[@ivanleterror9158]

6 turning and 4 burning.

[@bongwelt4903]

Awsome

[@proberts34]

First, you included the C-130 in a list of the largest aircraft ever built in the world?!?!? I don't think so. Also, how many prototypes are in that list? They don't count. And lastly, you clickbait us with a thumbnail of the Arsenal Bird from Ace Combat 7? Thumbsdown. Reported.

[@fredtedstedman]

great footage of the LUN.

[@cvbabc]

More like, "A Couple of the Largest Aircraft Ever Built in the World".

[@catis2cool455]

More like, “a few pretty large aircraft”

[@audimanuk]

The specs on ' Blackjack' are pretty impressive !

[@skhochay]

we did flying supersonic over Artica and we pushed this plane over mach 2.6+ I was thinking it was able to go more ...

[@johnnycole7990]

C-130 was my favorite plane to jump from back in my Army Days.... "64 troopers on one-way trip"

[@yb5515]

C5 Galaxy belongs on this list.

[@eugeneminton2613]

the reason why it has been extended for the b52 at least in part is due to a recent upgrade in more efficient engines. that will extend its range and endurance even further.

[@Fightre_Flighte]

That hasn't been approved yet- But they always have all the space they'll ever need for fresh electronics packages - given that it was designed for computers that practically needed a small bedroom size area. But it still does its job, and does it well. *We haven't needed a better B-52. They figured it all out with a slide rule and paper calculations.* New engines would be for cost reduction.

[@FlexibleToast]

The reason it got extended is because how cheap it is to operate. It also continues to have higher combat readiness than the B-1b.

[@louprentz8554]

THE C-130 IS THE BEST UTILITY AITCRAFT I EVER FLEW.

[@jayzcz4742]

Great use of Phlydaily’s video on the k-7 :D

[@wavvymilkdud9656]

should’ve credited PhlyDaily for the K-7

[@hurricaneshard9465]

Ye

[@markpatterson4917]

Liked the video 2 glaring miss outs were the spruce goose and the Bristol Brabazan

[@dailyaviation1828]

Yes you are right, but I don't want to make the video longer so it won't be boring. Thanks for your comment.

[@andrewbranch4918]

Too true friend. The brabazon was a monster and a person could stand upright in the wing of goose. I'd love to see both aircraft still flying. The feat of engineering in both cases is staggering

[@beachboy0505]

You have missed the important ground breaking aircraft The Vulcan, Harrrier and the Concorde

[@danielbetts4861]

True, but they were not that big…

[@beachboy0505]

@@danielbetts4861 respect

[@woundeddove]

I ❤️love, ❤️love, ❤️love...the B-52...She will always be my #1 choice...Hey 72 years old....I am 63.

[@tracynation2820]

Excellent. 💙 T.E.N.

[@Alex-sl4jt]

Love how you say BUFF so casually

[@kenkahre9262]

The original weak spot on the B-17 was not the plexiglass nose - it was the tail. The first tail structure was so fragile that it proved unable to stand up to severe weather. After a few crashes, it was redesigned, and that's how it wound up getting that beefier stabilizer.

[@proggravezilla4175]

The weak-spot of this video is counting everything in metric. I swear!, describe American airplanes w/ English-measurements & tack on European-sap numbers as extras. Who the hell knows what 40.05meters is? I have to stop everything, stop listening, & go calculate. I HATE that!

[@randyedwards3244]

@@proggravezilla4175 Not that this helps but as a 65 year old Canadian, I grew up during our countries conversion to metric. Still, I try converting to the Imperial system of feet and inches.

[@m.i.andersen8167]

@@proggravezilla4175 "Who the hell knows what 40.05meters is.." Only more than 7.5 billion people. And of course math can be difficult - But an easy rule to remember: 3.33 feet on a meter which means that 14 meters is approximately 46 feet.

[@oculusangelicus8978]

The ANtonov 225 comes to my hometown in Canada on a regular basis, that this is Gigantic it's every bit a big a a 747-800 but the fuselage is larger around and it carries more, and the engines are stupid loud!

[@SkullHunter-fe7bf]

You're from canada

[@Romans--bo7br]

Oculus Angelicus....... The AN 225, has Not been to your "hometown" (wherever That is)... in quite a while. It was pretty well destroyed in its hanger.. over a year ago, now.. during a missile strike.

[@XLA-zg1nn]

XB70 love

[@johncunningham4820]

The Enormous Antonov is simply AWESOME . I saw a Regular size one at an Air-show in Australia , and thought " How the Hell does that even Lift ? " . And the Standard one is actually a fairly SHORT-FIELD Aircraft . Amazing in a JET so big . Short-field is a Turbo-Prop specialty usually .

[@jhettish]

Vladimir Putin's army destroyed it during the opening of his "Special Millitary Operation" when they tried and failed to capture Kiev. Slava Ukrani

[@larrysorenson4789]

It was destroyed some time ago.

[@johncunningham4820]

@@larrysorenson4789 . Yes . The Mriya was destroyed during the Opening Days of the Current War in Ukraine .

[@70supertube]

Years ago a Ukrainian coworker was bragging up the Antonov being so big. I told him it was a big target. He got pissed. I wonder what he'd say today.

[@WhiteWolf65]

They have most of a second An-225 in storage, and the aim of Antonov is to put it together, possibly with upgrades, so she can fly in place of her sacrificed sister aircraft. Slava Ukraini!

[@danielhanawalt4998]

Enjoyed your video. A few other planes might have qualified for it. The C-5 Galaxy is pretty impressive. I wonder if there's a limit to how big a plane can be.

[@joeylawn36111]

Major limiting factors would be their weight and size - too big, and they couldn’t use most runways.

[@Chuck59ish]

Needs to be updated, the An-225 was destroyed by Russian Forces in the first weeks ofthe Russian invasion of the Ukraine. The plans are to build a new An-225 by the Antonov airlines.

[@CaddyJim]

The fingernail was deceiving and they left out a couple large planes

[@SmokeFlame1]

Shame. Not a mention of a single British design. The Avro Lancaster was a marvelous workhorse in WWII and most certainly should have been on the list, particularly when one you included was not really an aircraft. In addition, the K-7 was certainly unusual. But only 1 was built and when it crashed it killed 17 people.

[@David-ow9bc]

Agreed

[@danielsteger8456]

salty brit

[@gregoryfuller1136]

Actually, the B-17 was less than 5ft. longer the the Lanc. The Lancaster also had a larger bomb load capacity, up to the 22,000lb. Grand Slam.

[@petegarnett7731]

I believe the Bristol Brabazon was the biggest at the time it was built. The Saunders Roe Princess was probably the largest ever flying boat. Neither went into service, but nor did many of the ones listed.

[@slacko1971]

@2:55 I gave up watching, considering a third of B17's built were shot down how can you possibly say "almost always returned from a combat mission"?

[@AviatorDT]

because the average survival rate of a b-17 was 11 missions. so because 1/3 were shot down, those planes flew 11 times before being shot down so yes...they almost always returned considering the other 2/3 built werent lost.

[@Nightdare]

@@AviatorDT Slacko thinks these things only did one trip, while the sorties amassed to 10.000's

[@slacko1971]

@@Nightdare No I don't but having seen the memorial with a little model for every plane lost it really brings it home to you. saying the sorties amassed to 10000s only makes you realise just how many were lost if the survival rate was an average of 11 sorties.

[@andyb.1026]

or that a British fighter Bomber carried more bomb load at about twice the speed, with only 2 crew

[@basvanderhoek9293]

No More AN 225, end of an era for this "teenager"

[@workablob]

My late stepfather flew the C-130 'Hurkie Bird' over N. Vietnam. His plane was 'Moonbeam' and the other was 'AlleyCat'. There were two others that flew over S. Vietnam. Troops on the ground would radio them for close air support and they would direct the F4s and others to provide support. Ka-Boom!

[@kevinwynott7755]

The Ekranoplan is called a Wing in Ground Effect,or WiGE.....

[@chrisbaker2903]

The B-17 was NOT Boeing's first attempt at a modern heavy Bomber. That title goes to the B-15 which was about 1/2 larger but was not a success because they couldn't get engines powerful enough to carry that load. It was turned into a very long range transport mostly for higher officers who needed to go somewhere far from their permanent location. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_XB-15 Edit: The XB-70 had a very unique feature in the outer 1/3 of the wing folded down in flight for any supersonic flight. That folding portion of the wing was actually bigger than the wing of the B-58 Hustler. It allowed the shockwave that formed in front of the engine nacelle to be captured under the wing and provided enough extra lift that they could fly at those supersonic speeds with a zero angle of attack. That made sustained supersonic flight feasible for such a large aircraft and reduced it's fuel consumption considerably. It was as big as the B-52. Top speed on the B-52, about 600 knots or .95 Mach. Top speed on the B-70, about 2300 knots or as he says Mach 3.05. (Yes I am an aircraft geek.) edit 2: It was the second prototype that was crashed during a publicity stunt. The first prototype is at Wright Pat. edit 3: At 9:16 he talks about the missiles used for the first time off of a bomber and shows the missiles loaded on the wing stanchions of a "Bear". which by the way is NOT weaker than the B-52 in all respects. It has a much longer range and loiter time if needed. Edit 4: No there's not a special model to use on aircraft carriers. They landed and took off a regular C-130 from a carrier as a test to see if it could be done but was determined that it was not practical. He talks about a C-130 swinging it's wings and that is absolute BS deeper than the grand canyon. They are all fixed wing aircraft and do not swing their wings.

[@Thomas-ju2jn]

The battleship cannon turrets on the K-7 made it hard for me to take the rest of this as serious serious.

[@skrrtdotcom9120]

Yeah that was warthunder modded gameplay

[@robertheinkel6225]

Would the recoil damage the airframe?

[@caav56]

And not Arsenal Bird on the thumbnail?

[@walterfechter8080]

Howard Hughes' "Spruce Goose" might have seemed like a joke, but the thing DID fly, even if only for a short distance. It was a big plane!

[@tedthesailor172]

The Mriya's wingspan "is 20 metres wider than Anfield Stadium in Liverpool". Now there's an enlightening little titbit...

[@flippert0]

"Width of Anfield Stadium in Liverpool" is a common measure of lenght in ... Liverpool

[@redbomberr4594]

When I was a kid I saw a B-52 low fly over at Richmond Air Base in a air show. Dad (spent some time in Happy Valley 68-69) said the only thing they ever saw from them was the straight white lines in the sky except for one time when he saw a little bright spark then no more straight white lines

[@workablob]

Mriya flew over my house on final to KIAH less than 10 years ago. I thought I was just seeing things. It is so amazing to see in the sky.

[@joseveintegenario-nisu1928]

The funniest thing I remember in recent Aviation History is the USA taking B-25 'Mitchell Bombers' out of the desert storage, to refurbish it, and use it in the impossible to win Viet-Nam war.

[@edwardfletcher7790]

01:00 "Chrome Molly Denim" LMAO ! So where's the clickbait thumbnail plane ??

[@catphotos9836]

In Ace Combat 7. It's the Arsenal Bird from that game

[@ethericboy]

So the aircraft was actually built in the World? Wow!

[@romad357]

The Antonov 225 was destroyed by the Russians during their attack on Ukraine on 27 Feb 2022.

[@mikethecabbie8476]

The An225 recently visited RAF Brize Norton; in spooling up all six engines for take off, it blew down the perimeter fence and sent spectators backwards across the road!

[@TheWolfsnack]

...and it now has joined the list of aircraft lost to combat.

[@oxbaki5839]

They literally used a War thunder user mission for the k-7

[@mothership-lr6ss]

me seeing the thumbnail daredevil begins to play

[@welshpete12]

To say they didn't know if they would fly is untrue . By 1913 , they know very well what would and what would not fly, but not how well.

[@mewantkrinkov4206]

You know this was click bait because the k7 never existed, also I clicked on this accidentally while looking for random vids to watch your welcome

[@stephengardiner9867]

The title of this is pure "click-bait"! Many of these aircraft were NOT the largest in the world even when they were first built! A lot of inaccuracies in this video. I give this a big "FAIL"!

[@bearchow1929]

Agree, these producers are not experts on large aircraft. I own two books published in the '80's and they missed all the best and included a number tht don't belong. Stupid video.

[@dantesantucci1522]

Nobody gonna mention the ace combat screenshot for the thumbnail? Just me? Ok.

[@spaceace1006]

Amazing how those Aircraft of old were designed with nothing more than drafting tables and mechanical adding machines!!

[@livefully7568]

aircraft is plural! mind blown.

[@MayuriK_it]

Nice video but the preview is a clickbait

[@g0dsf3ar71]

got that phlydaily video playin XD

[@bigmamajuju2254]

the designer of the Lun Ecranoplan actually planned on making it a lot bigger than the one shown in this video.

[@claudelebel49]

I lived in Goose Bay Labrador in the early 60s and we had about 50 B52 is lined up within dight of our backyard. Maybe 50 is a little high but there was a load of them during this cold war era.

[@moxxie7610]

NAH WHERE MY BO B-29 AT?!

[@markfurney3670]

I thought they might show the Spruce Goose that was one of the biggest aircraft ever developed by Howard Hughes

[@andyb.1026]

Mmm except it didn't actually Fly !!!

[@markfurney3670]

@@andyb.1026 it didn't fly but it did hover above the water

[@machia0705]

Computers tell you in advance that an airplane can fly? Don’t let technological arrogance make you think this is entirely true. The 737Max computer simulations looked good on the screen too. Nice presentation but you left out the Howard Hughes giant transport. That held the record as the largest airplane ever constructed for a very long time.

[@dailyaviation1828]

Thanks for your comment.

[@bearchow1929]

737MAX is a perfect example of computer and simulation FAIL!

[@mike7652]

@@dailyaviation1828 Thanks for your ineptitude.

[@stratcat3216]

These automated robot voices are getting pretty good.. scarey that.

[@DiscothecaImperialis]

Kalinin's K7 was purely an impressive designs with Battleship guns mounted top and buttom.

[@barrywilliams991]

Casing looked like a colander? You mean the skin. The "casing" of an aircraft fuselage is the SKIN.

[@usernamunavailiable]

Flying sausage

[@jorgefernandez281]

I can't stand clock bait thumbnails. Automatic thumbs down from me.

[@voodoo_1_viper]

The thumbnail is giving me good ace combat 7 vibes

[@TheydyGodiva]

Right? Love the Arsenal Bird

[@nolanturner5607]

It is from AC 7.

[@davidadcock8717]

For decades, the Russians have been enamored with gigantic aircraft, like these. "Bigger Is Better - More Impressive, Da Comrade?" WOW! So how many of these big boys do you plan to build? What?!? ONE?!? Dinosaurs...

[@Freedom-yz7dn]

Why did I click this? Have I not learned by now that cool thumbnail = clickbait?

[@qno-oj3py]

I like that you use metric.

[@meepk633]

Where else are you going to build them?

[@bobbygamingscpgta6680]

I want to see b-29 superfortrees

[@spencergee6948]

I think that 'in the world' is superfluous.

[@atichatsai01]

Yep. Reported for misleading thumbnail lol.

[@mariodrechsler2618]

B-52, the most successful airplane in the world - it brought 2.000.000 tons of bombs to Laos

[@chrisbaker2903]

Mostly to North Viet Nam.

[@mariodrechsler2618]

@@chrisbaker2903 Yes, 4,.000.000 tons, and it lost some atomic bombs accidentially - what a heroic bomber

[@mariodrechsler2618]

@@chrisbaker2903 Your´re right: 4.500.000 tons to North Vietnam. Very good for the military-indusrial complex of the US, Eisenhower has warned about.

[@tmfu]

How about a C-5M Super Galaxy, Airbus 380, Boeing 747?