The Largest Holders of Nuclear Warheads in the World. SIPRI, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, The Arms Control Association.
Пікірлер: 609
@vanessacallahan35156 ай бұрын
If you pay attention not only US and Russia back and forth in an arms race, Pakistan and India are in one as well, just on a smaller scale.
@Foreverspiralling2 ай бұрын
Yeh no sh1t, Sherlock
@m-116 ай бұрын
Should have shown two being subtracted from United States in 1945
@irenafarm3 ай бұрын
I don’t think they counted those, since the nuclear arms race officially begins after they were deployed.
@DyNamiC_PulsE2 ай бұрын
Well those were atomic bombs not nuclear warheads
@davidblack455512 күн бұрын
3, there's the trinity test on July 16.
@antiares16844 ай бұрын
Thermonuclear weapons are the only thing which prevents full scale WWIII. Nuclear deterence is a real thing that works, lets hope that it countinues to work as intended.
@CyberneticEmperoroftheWorld5 ай бұрын
Советский союз, это мощь !!!
@user-oy7pf2he7s5 ай бұрын
Русский союз русская федерация русские
@armandoassante91683 ай бұрын
Его нет ! Его убили русские . Русским вообще нельзя доверять власть . Горбачев развалил страну . Ельцин пропил и продал страну. Путин добивает и распродаёт то что осталось от них . А народу дал ложный патриотизм того , чего уже давно нет . Живут прошлым и думают о прошлом .
@terrywert65874 ай бұрын
Good use of background music here. Definately reflects the danger of the situation!
@haroldmerewether12246 ай бұрын
America went full steam ahead with their nuke production after the war.
@vindicator055 ай бұрын
Quantity comparison with nuke overkills is like two guys counting their matches with one having 2 and the other one having 5 on the hand - and a bathub full of petrol between them.
@irenafarm3 ай бұрын
I remember the height of the Arms Race and the end of it. The Arms Race was TERRIFYING. We’re still feeling the effects today. I don’t think people realize how deeply that conflict scarred the world. I genuinely cannot stand Reagan. However, his decision to up the ante with space-based defense was absolutely the hole in the dike of the Iron Wall. With that shift, we only need about 25% of our full arsenal to glass every Russian urban center and defense sector. And it can happen before 50% of anything Russia launches, gets here. That would be absolutely awful. But as Sting sang, “There’s no such thing as a winnable war. It’s a lie we don’t believe any more… Believe me when I say to you, I hope the Russians love their children, too.”
@anthonyvono28786 ай бұрын
Man will eventually destroy himself and his world. Do they really need all those nuclear weapons? It's disgusting.
@jetster7856 ай бұрын
Or Artificial intelligence could be a threat! Indeed tens of thousands nukes is nonsense and utter stupidity particularly from the US and Russia!
@Be3nz6 ай бұрын
I views politics and the politics of war , propaganda in politics, as something very immature.and Lacking in any Honor
@rudragaming69776 ай бұрын
Absolutely we need. Because of nuclear weapons WW3 is not happening
@suman92996 ай бұрын
@@rudragaming6977I agree or we destroy ourself in many ways, many differences…
@FelixX1386 ай бұрын
Ядерное оружие является очень хорошим аргументом сдерживания. К слову та же Северная Корея сейчас себя чувствует намного лучше как раз за счёт Ядерного оружия и поддержки России. Поверь мне без этого оружия Пхеньян себя чувствовал намного сложнее особенно когда часто проводились военные учения между Америкой и Южной Кореей тогда часто самолёты этих стран практически заходили на территорию Северной Кореи и пытались спровоцировать на ответ и это могло сработать во первых радары явно не могли точно показать в нужное время что самолёты не долетели и развернулись, а во вторых Пхеньян вот он, до него рукой подать, а там сотни самых важных людей страны находится. Думаю объяснять что Южная Корея перестала подобным заниматься из-за появления Ядерного оружия у Северной Кореи, думаю не стоит, сам поймёшь 😊
@DKS_London6 ай бұрын
Something wrong here, India conducted it's first nuclear test in 1974, so surely it had the nuclear weapon.
@naumankhan60535 ай бұрын
India and Pakistan had the ability to produce nuclear weapons in the 60's. It was not until late 90's that they engaged in a nuclear arms race. Both countries had operational nuclear reactors running in 60's.
@jont25766 ай бұрын
It's funny how we invented the means to wipe out the entire earth even before we solved anything
@andyz39255 ай бұрын
These are precise, accurate numbers to the penny.
@user-kz1vg9ry2b4 ай бұрын
But, doesn't the present us have enough men,real men to fight a long bloody war ? I don't think so, and men win wars.any doubt, sissies?😂😂btw, Ukraine is fighting a proxy war for the US now, and that's how it's gonna become,that's until others get it,and that is, the US doesn't have real men anymore!!Men without balls don't win wars!!😂😂
@cye586 ай бұрын
That's just straight scary ! 👁️
@alltimeartcraft24416 ай бұрын
Which software do you use for making this racing bar? Please Reply...
@Sacacasmeajudem6 ай бұрын
O video original pertence ao canal "La vida en lo gráfico"
@valetudo73636 ай бұрын
Honestly, how would anyone really know these numbers. It’s not like this is advertised public information. 🤔
@andyz39255 ай бұрын
Exactly. Look how accurate U.S. intelligence was for Iraq. My thoughts are no nation will ever know exactly how many nukes other countries may have no matter how high tech their intelligence may be... .. not even a ball park figure.
@thelocallocksmithcompany-t91643 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. You have no idea how many nukes anyone else has. Crazy to think you know these details by year.
@Lucas-lz1mt3 ай бұрын
@@thelocallocksmithcompany-t9164 são estimativas com base em análises de documentos. Todos sabíamos a e os Estados Unidos estava mentindo sobre o Iraque, como em quase todas suas guerras.
@cordeg6 ай бұрын
In 1960, the Kennedy campaign tried to claim that Eisenhower had allowed the USSR to leap frog the US nuke deployment and open a "missile gap" but we had a 10:1 advantage at the time. By the time JFK/LBJ were out it was 3:1. By the time Reagan cancelled "detante", they had actually leapfrogged us. Politics is funny that way.
@mattllaves6 ай бұрын
I imagine it would have been extremely difficult to tell how many nukes the Soviets had at the time
@cordeg6 ай бұрын
@@mattllaves numbers in those days were based mostly on human intelligence and on the amount of industrial activity in areas where we knew nuclear development was being done via U2 flyovers and the like. You are right that this would be a gross estimate at best.
@larsdahlen3196 ай бұрын
@@mattllavesImage the world where a man with a stone axe could rule . Because he could if no one else had nothing.
@user-zp7wc5nl2p4 ай бұрын
Мы всегда были впереди вас 😂
@Filtox-Lenur4 ай бұрын
@@user-zp7wc5nl2pпо яйцам? Или по окорочкам? А может по выпуску автомобилей? Не смеши людей…
@noidnobb6 ай бұрын
Quantity is never an issue, the issue is who dares to use it. and whether they can bear the consequences.😀
@sunnyboner6766 ай бұрын
Maybe you’ve forgotten? Americans have used them twice on a civilian population in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
@leochan66826 ай бұрын
Yes, but back at that time no one but America had it. Today, everyone have it.
@cikorasikorskiy14866 ай бұрын
США уже применяли ядерное оружие против Японии. Не стесняясь. Миллионы жертв от двух маленьких бомб.
@dewaynesmith17186 ай бұрын
I agree. Depends who's devilish enough to push the big red button
@robertjensen10485 ай бұрын
@@sunnyboner676Maybe you’ve forgotten that civilians were fair game during WW2, if it achieved a larger strategic picture.
@PacificMonk5 ай бұрын
From the time a baby boomer was born to the time they were teenagers, the world had gone from 0 to some 30,000 nuclear weapons.
@Happy-wb8gi6 ай бұрын
What is not mentioned is that Italy at Aviano NATO Air base has alot, all belonging to the dmUSA which they can use when ever they want and the Italian government has no power over it.
@flyingpharoah48676 ай бұрын
Same for when Ukraine "had" them
@Joker-no1uh6 ай бұрын
Maybe because they belong to the US? Just a guess
@Happy-wb8gi6 ай бұрын
@@Joker-no1uh yep, but also because Italy since the 2nd WW has been ruled by the Mafia and USA tbh. In Italy every one knows this, our government is corruption and tge USA dictate to them. Sad, but true!
@FhillipFry5 ай бұрын
Italians don't do war good
@alastairbarkley65725 ай бұрын
Are you a American? If the Italian government becomes uncomfortable with Aviano nukes it can order them removed by the US. And, if the US is slow to take them away the Italians can seize them and forcibly return them to America. What's the benefit to.Italy to keep nukes there?
@Mr_harshit186 ай бұрын
Plz make vedio on total internet users by countries
@rubenbaraxa5 ай бұрын
Its the same as population , for last 10 yeras at least.
@martinb.7702 ай бұрын
"No mouse would develop the idea to build a mouse trap!"
@Benzijune2 ай бұрын
What a shame for humanity 😢
@sokratisperatinos46586 ай бұрын
All the world is a madhouse. They are all nuts.
@user-zu6qn9ux9n6 ай бұрын
Mostly politicians
@armandoassante91683 ай бұрын
- Я не знаю какой будет 3-я мировая война , но четвёртая точно будет на палках ! Эйнштейн.
@81munir6 ай бұрын
Aren't they scared if it all blew up in their own countries? Crazy.
@CrazyPanda.0006 ай бұрын
Use need ro mix two materials to make nuclear reaction, both are kept separately
@fgk765jkh7 күн бұрын
@CrazyPanda.000 excuse me? 😂 not anywhere closeto how a nuclear bomb works.
@ammiraglio506 ай бұрын
Honestly .... This Is Only what they want that we know.
@Lovecbabochek6 ай бұрын
These are strategic nuclear weapons. Russia also has 20,000+ such charges. These are special 152mm, 230mm shells.
@dvaplustwo6 ай бұрын
Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Belarus have never had nuclear weapons. These were the heads of the USSR, located in various parts of its territory, including the territory of the USSR, the BSSR and others. To say the opposite is the same as saying that the US nuclear heads located in Belgium, Italy and Turkey are the nuclear weapons of these countries
@marshalljarnagin93706 ай бұрын
Ukraine held control of the nukes. When the USSR collapsed, so did their control. Ukraine didn't want them, and eventually signed a deal to give them back. But they weren't under Russian control.
@Dryadenjoyer6 ай бұрын
After the collapse of the soviets, the weapons still remained on their territory. The main command post no longer existed. The fact that these countries surrendered their nuclear arsenals is a result of the Lisbon Protocol. This was a collective decision and a joint agreement, not the desire of one of the parties. So technically they had nuclear weapons and, more likely, if they had not accepted this protocol, they would have remained nuclear powers.
@dvaplustwo6 ай бұрын
No, it was a Soviet nuclear weapon controlled from Moscow. And Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus could not launch it in 1992 - only from Moscow. Just like Belgium today cannot launch American nuclear weapons located on its territory
@NazriB6 ай бұрын
Lies again? Dallas Bull S**t USD SGD
@Dryadenjoyer6 ай бұрын
@@dvaplustwo , soviets don’t exist from December 26, 1991. Something that doesn’t exist cannot posses or control anything.
@edmiy83956 ай бұрын
O Japão e Coreia do Sul possuía matéria prima pra construir as ogivas, está na hora de cada um ter 300 ogivas-dissuasão
@TheGreatCatsby-pd2tt6 ай бұрын
I agree that Cuba will have 500 warheads.
@Constantin575 ай бұрын
Nicaragua? Why not?
@FhillipFry5 ай бұрын
They have to speak with their boss first
@user-ze2dp8ml9u5 ай бұрын
Ахаха ты сначало на карту мира посмотри и попробуй найти на ней свою японию и мелкобританию им вообще нет смысла что то иметь🚀💥🇯🇵🏳️🌈🇬🇧💥🤣🤣
@muhammedjaseemshajeef6781Ай бұрын
Japan is puppet of usa😢@@FhillipFry
@RubenDeanda-lb9wr6 ай бұрын
60 thousands heads at the pinacle what a madness
@namasi70705 ай бұрын
So we now know who started the nuclear arms race.
@MrJord19945 ай бұрын
It was never not known
@dormantviewer2 ай бұрын
Gog and magog..
@mj481875 ай бұрын
Suggestion: Minerals
@nikolaimariaromanov83844 ай бұрын
I was of the understanding it only takes one!
@user-hr5el6pj2f6 ай бұрын
На другом канале совсем другие данные были в графике 🤷♂️
@PrimumGenus6 ай бұрын
Late 70s must totally be Soviet Union golden era
@QQru3nik6 ай бұрын
Конец 70х стал причиной распада СССР
@IgorSmirnoff-qr3xd6 ай бұрын
@@QQru3nikНезнайка на Луне
@IgorSmirnovSpb5 ай бұрын
Ничего удивительного. На Западе энергетический кризис и психологическая травма от поражения во Вьетнаме. В СССР благоприятные цены на нефть и то, что было заложено Сталиным в экономике и образовании дало свои плоды.
@benjamingrant34415 ай бұрын
На самом деле 60е, если мы берем все показатели, включая качество жизни.
@vipeerx5 ай бұрын
Ну основная масса наших родителей и родственников считают, что 70е были лучшим временем в СССР
@ngacni4 ай бұрын
The numbers are down, the power went up
@muawiyashaikh22296 ай бұрын
Japan also had 2💀💀💀
@allydr906 ай бұрын
VERY active nuclear warheads
@user-zu6qn9ux9n6 ай бұрын
Had
@shahid85456 ай бұрын
One thing is for sure. They didn't build and research this tech to have them sitting around. They will be used a some point.
@Rayxxx19741Ай бұрын
they are built for deterence. do you know the means of deterence?😂😂😂😂😂At this point its better that any country can have but it surely doesn t mean conventional wars cannot exist anymore.
@shahid8545Ай бұрын
@@Rayxxx19741 You don't think these will not be used? Don't be so gullible. They have already been used and they will be used again.
@Rayxxx1974128 күн бұрын
@@shahid8545 fuck if nukes are used as you think even cities would have their own arsenal. Does the world Deterrence means nothing to you? Probably not.
@shahid854528 күн бұрын
@@Rayxxx19741 Nuclear have already been used pinhead. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
@nandotorres44616 ай бұрын
¿Irán what are you waiting for?
@syedrafi22586 ай бұрын
No one can stop them if they will dare to make it
@whatif49425 ай бұрын
Where are a the obsolete ones?
@nicksheppard81075 ай бұрын
So all the ol ones went on ebay?
@fajarcahyono36932 ай бұрын
First Music : The Great War Second Music : The Eternal War
@aqeel-37716 ай бұрын
Fun fact- couple of ussr nukes are missing after ussr fell.
@Manu109006 ай бұрын
And a couple of US nukes were lost in the ocean and were never found...
@user-qm1zx1kk6v5 ай бұрын
Если сшп на своей территории ВСЕ свои заряды взорвёт, то этого достаточно, чтобы человек прекратил существование
@surrocclusion442Ай бұрын
Nuclear bombs have devastating effects, but it becomes necessary to have them if your enemy has them.
@varoonnone71596 ай бұрын
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto said that Pakistan will have nuclear weapons even if it meant Pakistanis had to later eat grass Thanks to China, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and Pakistanis are eating grass
@Judah_8896 ай бұрын
Actually it's USA who helped pakistan to get nukes as Pakistan was the biggest non nato ally of USA in cold war to counter india
@factsofrealsandreels19116 ай бұрын
India like always scored second position in world hunger index South Asia now tell who is eating grass
@cobra283736 ай бұрын
@@factsofrealsandreels1911but I'm not hungry😮
@syedrafi22586 ай бұрын
India has more hunger index than Pakistan but urine drinker have audacity to say Pakistan poor
@syedrafi22586 ай бұрын
@@cobra28373wtf! You are not hungry it means others are also not hungry,what a cringe indian mindset😂😂😂
@rimatanluhur60646 ай бұрын
who did say that
@user-ss1pn5hd4gКүн бұрын
Lest we forget, USA would not have had these weapons without the European scientists. Even Oppenheimer studied at Cavendish at Cambridge which has always been the foremost physics school since scientific revolution almost. Oppenheimer was academically excellent but his lab skills were an abonimation according to eminent Physicists Rutherford et al
@LiveAlohaOhana6 ай бұрын
Thats scary
@dugarburyadad5 ай бұрын
В 45 году у США должно было уменьшиться количество на 2.
@saisirvous73636 ай бұрын
China in 2020 have 270 Then in 2022 have 410😂
@sunnyboner6766 ай бұрын
Have you not seen the Us reports on how China is rapidly increasing its nuclear arsenal and building silos to house them?
@PrinceofPeace200019 күн бұрын
It doesn't matter who's wrong or right, we're all ded! D-E-D...ded!
@ralfnaval27806 ай бұрын
Philippines should have its nuclear capability around the year 1970s.. if it wasn't for that revolution which promises progress, freedom which turns out to be the opposite.. so sad..
@damirsirotic052Ай бұрын
How many times should it be reminded that Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus have never possessed (were the owners of) a single nuclear warhead. They were deployed on their territory, but these weapons were commanded, guarded, and maintained by the joint forces of the CIS.
@user-po2qb6cm9qАй бұрын
Not one of them will ever be fired in anger either. The world starves to death while it slowly heats up and what was the bill in taxes for these WMD?
@johnclayton41666 ай бұрын
Imagine what all the money spent by our government on military could do to improve everyones lives , instead of being hellbent on destroying everything
@jamiecook82396 ай бұрын
With out a military, enemy states can just walk in an ruin your peaceful life.
@raulroopchand34925 ай бұрын
Imagine if people got off their fat lazy backsides and worked to improve their own lives instead of expecting the government to do everything for them.
@jamiecook82395 ай бұрын
No military= Putin and Xi Ping will be your leader
@alastairbarkley65725 ай бұрын
Sorry, EVERYONE in the world is lazy and has a fat arse? What are you talking about? I worked.very hard all my life and now I have a comfortable, well-deserved retirement, I think how much better health and how much more years of healthy life I might have if literally thousands of trillions hadn't been spent on nuclear weapons. Does that explain it?
@raven-wf9so5 ай бұрын
It might be better to imagine that your sat in your garden ,and your neighbour wants to expand his fence with a bulldozer , good luck persuading him to stop with your unicorn 🦄
@henrywang39776 ай бұрын
China is not exactly transparent on the stock number of nuclear arsenal yet. All the available numbers are guesses.
@sksksks50726 ай бұрын
So what is the numbers u think ?
@henrywang39776 ай бұрын
@@sksksks5072 Hardly known. But I guess it wouldn't be less than 1000 since 2018.
@hydrogenivtinyhare52186 ай бұрын
@@henrywang3977What’s your guess based on?
@henrywang39776 ай бұрын
@@hydrogenivtinyhare5218 The launching vehicle has shown on 2019 parade all added together could have more than 400 nuclear warhead launching capability. Warheads are actually cheaper than the rockets and the vehicles, so there should be slightly more missiles than the launchers. They can't bring all the launchers for a parade, there must be more of them staying in position. That I think it is a safe guess to double that number to be the minimum of the total number.
@hydrogenivtinyhare52186 ай бұрын
@@henrywang3977 I checked your estimation, you’re about there. There were 16x DF-17, 32x DF-100, 16x DF-26, 12x JL-2, 16x DF-31, 4x DF-5B, 16x DF-41. In which DF-17 and DF-100 are not nuclear compatible, DF-26, JL-2, and DF-31 can carry 3 small warheads, DF-5B can carry 1 big warhead, and DF-41 can carry 10 small warheads. Assume they were all loaded with nuclear warheads, the total was 296 nukes.
@ObiwanKenobitomat212Ай бұрын
Without Indonesia, it's impossible for US to produce nuclear warhead so drastically. They exploited all nuclear materials from Freeport Hills.
@Paulista23096 ай бұрын
Brazil?
@captainamerica58266 ай бұрын
Oppenheimer you smarty pants
@jakeeasterwood32042 ай бұрын
How many times over to destroy the planet is really necessary?
@philipdennis-rh7uj6 ай бұрын
Biggest diffrence? Our stuff works
@Lucas-lz1mt6 ай бұрын
Ukraine shows that no material is what governments say it is
@user-yg3nx9en2f6 ай бұрын
Нет тут никакой разницы, дружок, это все очень нехорошо.
@adrianmedina26296 ай бұрын
U dckhd
@manpreetbrar8385 ай бұрын
The united states need to start sharing out some of that loove❤
@user-kg1og9qq1c3 ай бұрын
With?
@kennethwilder42533 ай бұрын
I wonder how many of these are tactical nukes, compared to ICBM nukes?
@sergioeaeapp19 күн бұрын
No es algo de lo que sentir mucho orgullo.
@ozgebateman73436 ай бұрын
Disgrace why 🥺
@sharetherisk76475 ай бұрын
Way to be there Canada...oh snap, they didn't even make the list
@djzoodude6 ай бұрын
The two at the top have the power to wipe out the human species, a couple times over. So that's fun.
@arfanhaziq3075Ай бұрын
So Iran has no nuke.. But US is very worried 😂
@pq_azАй бұрын
Iran DOES have nuclear scientists... according to these moments😉😉
@arfanhaziq3075Ай бұрын
@@pq_az Almost every country in the world have nuclear scientist.. and US still worried 🤣🤣🤣
@pq_azАй бұрын
@@arfanhaziq3075 of course. Holding a nuclear weapon is not about destruction like it is about the paranoia of its holder and the threatened of those who might be its potential target.
@molonlave21935 күн бұрын
They have Uranium which can be used to build nuclear weapons.
@mikec94353 ай бұрын
Who tried to hold all the power first? Interesting....
@salaheldin26676 ай бұрын
هل هناك تكنولوجيا لتحويل الطاقة النووية للقنابل الحربية الذرية الي طاقة يمكن التحكم فيها والاستفادة منها بدلا من استخدامها كاداة تدميرية إرهابية قاتلة لو الإجابة بالنفي لا توجد فهنا تقع المصيبة كيف نصنع شيئ كهذا ليدمر الأرض التي تجعلنا أحياء على سطحها
@weisslight8185 ай бұрын
MOX технология...
@gaston_portus6 ай бұрын
Espero que el cabezas nucleares no comience a crecer😢
@nhanoacid6 ай бұрын
Pues si que bajaron drásticamente con lis acuerdos que tuvieron ¿ solo mira la urss con 40 mil warheads activados ?ahora solo 4800 de actual Rusia Ya son menos los golpes 🤪
@irenafarm3 ай бұрын
This is a bit misleading. Active warheads don’t automatically imply ability to deploy. It also doesn’t take into account deployment technology. Most of the US deployment is focused on submarines. Most Russian nukes are geared for land-based deployment. Also, Russia’s war with Ukraine has amply demonstrated the gap between _theoretical_ war footing and actual capabilities. There’s rampant decay, corruption, lack of training, and incompetence at every level. Imo, there’s equal chances as to whether a launched warhead would 1) not actually launch 2) simply crash into the nearest urban center 3) come down on some random non-target 4) actually make it to the intended target but not activate 5) actually activate as intended. Some of the US systems are also aging but we’re aware of the issues. These mostly affect the silo-based systems that don’t figure into most response plans.
@engineershow7656 ай бұрын
USA 🇺🇸 Best of the Best 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼😎
@andreyiforoff88915 ай бұрын
😂 🏴☠️+🏳️🌈=🇺🇲
@juancarlosromobejar37956 ай бұрын
Corea del Norte con muchas carencias materiales y con un paupérrimo nivel de vida de sus habitantes pero eso sí con armas nucleares.
@Mike-vr4lw2 ай бұрын
MAD
@vieuxbal12535 ай бұрын
1945 Little Boy and Fat Man. 1961 Tsar Bomba... and the rest is history.
@alvarocisneros16486 ай бұрын
Tener esas armas debería ser un delito
@marcosl43742 ай бұрын
Many countries have the technology to build them today but there's an agreement of non proliferation of nuclear warheads
@muhamadakmal46933 ай бұрын
How about Iran and Indonesia, why don't you have data about it
@thomasedwardking72865 ай бұрын
British testing in Australia, the French in the Pacific. We won't have that in our neighbourhood, please. Peace ✌️🕊️ Au revoir
@cryptotimes15834 ай бұрын
South Africa giving up it's nuclear weapons want a mistake.
@Mertvayamyish5 ай бұрын
Спасибо советским ученым , что в 49 году изобрели ядерное оружие!
@enPassantWarrior90476 ай бұрын
can anyone explain how these nuclear warheads keep on decreasing if they were not using it
@user-of5ft4og3s6 ай бұрын
Американцы обманули Россию сказали что будут сокращать вместе пока Россия сокращала они свои закапывали в земли!хотя они сами России выделили деньги на постройку специальных заводов по утелизации ядерного оружия и Россия исполняла этот договор а они нет
@q___m21586 ай бұрын
Google INF treaty (1987) START 1 treaty (1991) etc
@enPassantWarrior90476 ай бұрын
@@q___m2158 here
@GateKeeperXL4 ай бұрын
The US could've conquered the world after WWII with it's nuke arsenal and while the rest of the world are still reeling from the aftermath. Yet it did not. Instead, the US helped rebuild those mostly affected by the War, like Japan. It would've been a different story if it was the Nazis who triumphed.
@armandoassante91683 ай бұрын
Зато нацисты передали эстафету России.
@69digs593 ай бұрын
You mean it could have conquered the whole world by nuking all the countries? Ok, yes. That's true. Why would the US want to do that? What would be the purpose of having a polluted and radioactive planet with the US as the only liveable country on the planet? Actually, I don't get your point. Please explain.
@eduardodelatorre94392 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@AlexMolchanov9013 күн бұрын
@@armandoassante9168Глупо такое писать.
@user-or8ur8uw4m11 күн бұрын
Зачем США было уничтожать мир, если они были главными выигравшими в нём? Им ничего не угрожало и не угрожает сейчас.
@GothRailfan5 ай бұрын
USA: "Quick! Soviet Union has 1 warhead! Faster god dammit!"
@johnmeckel23195 ай бұрын
They May Have The Most, But You Failed to List ALL Countries With Nuclear Weapons! Iran, India,.......
@Shapinator7215 ай бұрын
Iran?! Not bloody likely!
@johnmeckel23195 ай бұрын
@@Shapinator721 Keep telling yourself that! 🙄
@tcggf20236 ай бұрын
Iran ?
@Pearcewreck5 ай бұрын
United Kingdom: FFS, 500 is enough. United States: What??!! Too much is never enough! Soviet Union: Hold my Vodka.
@mauricedelarosa60835 ай бұрын
True, both the US and Russia hit some pretty scary big numbers, but I was surprised - and happy to see - that both the US and Russia reduced their stockpiles significantly over the years.
@user-ny3ry3sy7h6 ай бұрын
Қазақстан 1400 атом бомбасы бар ел болған 1994 жылға дейін.
@user-ti3bm4kt8c5 ай бұрын
которыми они не могли пользоваться чисто физически :)
@andreyiforoff88915 ай бұрын
Правильно было бы сказать, что на территории Казахстана когда-то размещалось ядерное оружие, которое Казахстан не мог использовать и содержать самостоятельно. Вряд-ли эту ситуацию можно назвать обладанием ядерным оружием. Тоже самое можно сказать и об Украине. Разместить на своей территории и распоряжаться - это разные вещи.
@allannielsen9554Ай бұрын
When you think about the damages in Hiroshima and Nakasaki - you wonder why these in sane numbers is nessesary. The 10000 people surviving, will all be goverments, presidents and other emperors, sitting in their underground "paradice" - waiting a couple of 100 years to get up in a burned, destroyed world. I heard the neantherthal man was extinct
@LostHongshan6 ай бұрын
Anyone else scratching their head over a country like Pakistan having 170? Huh?
@welshed5 ай бұрын
Erm, not really. Haven’t they had about four wars with India?
@arestoaresto52996 ай бұрын
Where is Japan?
@jimcampbell47385 ай бұрын
Off the east coast of Asia.😅
@eddywahyudi10116 ай бұрын
It is sad that countries are subject to embargoes from developed countries, because of the impact of nuclear development 😢
@user-br8xi7mq1e4 ай бұрын
When SU made first, US had 150 already....To protect themselves.......😂😂😂😂😂
@fajarcahyono3693Ай бұрын
Anyone who think human is not the most powerful species in the world and think that human not in the top of food chain is wrong. 1 Nuclear Arsenal can have 3,000 times the explosive power of Hiroshima Nuclear Bombing
@Richnineteenseventyone4 ай бұрын
Boggles the mind. Only a very small percentage of nukes is required to wipe out the earth ffs
@intelligenthoodlum89353 ай бұрын
Ha ha…. This list is like asking a woman how many “bodies” she got….whatever she says, just double or triple that number 😂💀
@Sandy-rv9tv5 ай бұрын
The odd one here is Pak The number of nukes they have is far outstripped by the number of begging bowls in circulation begging for money to run their country
@Kielermatrosen6 ай бұрын
You should not have put Kazakhstan and Ukraine in the count. Or you should also include italy and Germany who have US warhead on their territories but do not have the clearance nor the ability to use them.
@kolyakordai52136 ай бұрын
Что ты там пишешь насчёт Казахстана ?
@user-vq7td8bd7i6 ай бұрын
@@kolyakordai5213ничего хорошего.
@kolyakordai52136 ай бұрын
@@user-vq7td8bd7i так и понял.
@Lovecbabochek6 ай бұрын
@@kolyakordai5213он всего лишь пишет что не стоило Казахстан и Украину в эту графику вставлять. Так как самостоятельно они не владели ядерным оружием. Оружие находилось на территории, но управлялось из Москвы и после развала СССР постепенно было вывезено. Намекнул на то что ядерное оружие находящееся в Германии и Италии тоже им не принадлежит, это все имущество США. Тоесть ничего хорошего и плохого комментатор не писал.
@JCostlowMedia4 ай бұрын
apples oranges
@warrior68035 ай бұрын
Soviets were able to catch up because American had limited production
@Shapinator7215 ай бұрын
Nah cos America saw sense not to waste further funds on excess nukes! Thats why Russia is a poorish country today in relation.
@user-il4ul6wn9r6 ай бұрын
China having less no of nucler wapon. that country really like pease, but western propogada😢😢
@rehsa-zc6zq6 ай бұрын
I don't believe them. They are likely hiding the real number.