The Legal Void in Which AI Weapons Operate

  Рет қаралды 7,246

Centre for International Governance Innovation

Centre for International Governance Innovation

Күн бұрын

Proponents of autonomous weapons will highlight the precision of these machines to hit their target, avoiding unintended casualties and limiting impacts on civilians. But precise tools wielded in imprecise ways can be very harmful. When states consider deploying modern autonomous systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI), they must consider the legal and ethical concerns in addition to the technical specifications of the tool.
In this video, Branka Marijan, senior researcher at Project Ploughshares, discusses the legal concerns of using automated AI weapons and the role that human judgment plays in determining if a target is legitimate and if the attack falls within international rules of engagement.
“At the moment, no one can be held accountable for actions carried out by an autonomous system,” explains Marijan. The international community must set out clear rules of use before these autonomous systems are so ubiquitous that their use runs rampant, causing unnecessary harm and civilian casualties because guardrails weren’t in place.
Read the essay here: www.cigionline.org/articles/a...

Пікірлер: 2
@cemkeskin5320
@cemkeskin5320 Жыл бұрын
Good job ☝️
@131kimber
@131kimber Жыл бұрын
In regards to the statement “At the moment, no one can be held accountable for actions carried out by an autonomous system,” by Ms. Branka Marijan... I would disagree. Computers, including AI Supercomputers are PROGRAMMED by Real People and DO EXACTLY as they are programmed to do. There isn't any ambiguity involved. Its Military precision. Therefore its more akin to a person/Organization/Entity using the AI as a Weapon deliberately just as a shooter uses a gun. Just because AI Supercomputers have all the latest software and technological abilities that can analyze a situation, even make recommendations, it still has to have REAL PEOPLE approval before it can execute its deployment planner. I would go so far as to say... using Computerized Weapon Systems actually means those Hard Drives Have Evidence of serious crimes, home sponsored terrorism and treason. Who they are, What they did and How they Did it. And that YES people can be held accountable for how they've abused and misused it.
Regulating Autonomy in Weapons Systems
2:10
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Smart Contracts Explained
4:47
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 3,6 М.
OMG 😨 Era o tênis dela 🤬
00:19
Polar em português
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Did you find it?! 🤔✨✍️ #funnyart
00:11
Artistomg
Рет қаралды 116 МЛН
SHE WANTED CHIPS, BUT SHE GOT CARROTS 🤣🥕
00:19
OKUNJATA
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Waterloo Security Dialogue
3:09
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 5 М.
Clearing The Fog: The Grey Zones of Space Governance
3:02
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 119
The Global Economic Scenarios Program
4:04
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 24 М.
Every Kind of Bridge Explained in 15 Minutes
17:36
Practical Engineering
Рет қаралды 417 М.
Can a Boat Float In Supercritical Fluid?
9:13
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 131 М.
Surveillance Capitalism
1:33:21
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 649
The Strategic Military Importance of the Space Domain
3:43
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 24 М.
What Is Technology-Facilitated Violence?
6:28
Centre for International Governance Innovation
Рет қаралды 23 М.
AGI: solved already?
22:11
John Koetsier
Рет қаралды 18 М.
OMG 😨 Era o tênis dela 🤬
00:19
Polar em português
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН